Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 22 September 2020

Abstract and Keywords

In routine clinical practice, diagnosis and assessment are conducted predominantly using nonstandardized interviews and clinical judgment. This chapter presents an overview of numerous diagnostic errors that result from underuse of structured interviews and other standardized tools. The prevalence of both underdetection and overdetection of mood disorders, as well as the underrecognition of diagnostic comorbidity, is reviewed. Next, problems in the routine assessment of treatment outcome are described. The clinical implications of each of these errors are discussed. A range of standardized self-report and clinician-administered tools to improve diagnostic accuracy are reviewed, and recommendations for integrating measurement-based care into routine clinical settings are given. Finally, the chapter outlines recent advances to utilize feasible and cost-effective Internet-based screening measures to enhance routine standardized outcome assessment.

Keywords: diagnosis, assessment, mood disorders, comorbidity, measurement-based care, Internet-based screening

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.