Abstract and Keywords
The two international outcomes most in need of explanation in post–Cold War Asia are the region’s relative stability and economic dynamism. This chapter contrasts the explanations provided by international structure to those provided by foreign policy analysis (FPA). Although less parsimonious than international structural explanations, FPA approaches are capable of addressing the anomalies (such as the absence of power balancing against the hegemon) encountered, but left unresolved, by international structural arguments. The chapter examines four key FPA variables—threat perception, national identity, ideology, and leadership—and shows how they can account for the region’s relative stability and economic dynamism.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.