Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 18 August 2019

Abstract and Keywords

Significant gaps remain between what we know about development effectiveness and what we want to know. The chapter first tries to understand these persistent knowledge gaps in terms of distorted incentives, inadequate funding of evaluative research, and ethical objections to evaluations. The chapter then discusses how evaluations might become more relevant to the knowledge needs of practitioners and civil society. It is argued that (1) more attention needs to be given to identifying policy-relevant questions (including the case for intervention) and redressing publication biases in reporting the answers obtained; (2) a broader approach should be taken to the problems of internal validity (including heterogeneity, portfolio effects, and spillover effects); (3) the problems of external validity (including scaling up) merit more attention.

Keywords: external validity, heterogeneity, impact evaluation, internal validity

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.