Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 18 October 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This article discusses the advantages and inherent challenges of undertaking a quasi-experimental estimation technique for evaluation of a land use policy application. This method of evaluation enables researchers to address selection issues when defensible instrumental variables are not available. Although advantageous with regard a specific policy, the approach suffers from a potential lack of generalizability due to the lack of structure in the model. In short, the prime advantage of the quasi-experimental method may also be its greatest challenge to widespread application and formation of new policy. However, the propensity score method improves substantially on alternative approaches in evaluating land use policies in which endogenous policy selection is of concern. The chapter illustrates the procedure directly and provides a step-by-step application to an existing land use policy in Maryland.

Keywords: propensity score matching, policy evaluation, land use

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.