Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 22 July 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This chapter discusses the need for industrial-organizational (IO) psychology to be more inclusive. Historically, IO psychologists have focused on research topics that are of prime interest to management and have neglected topics that are of interest largely to workers. Topics such as personnel selection and productivity have received much more attention than topics such as unionization and making working lives more meaningful. In addition, IO psychologists have generally preferred quantitative methods instead of qualitative methods; this preference has made it more difficult for IO psychologists to understand phenomena from workers' perspectives. This article discusses the history of these biases and provides a series of suggestions for scholars to incorporate into their professional lives so that they can be more inclusive in their choice of topics, perspectives, and methodologies.

Keywords: history of IO psychology, methodological bias, qualitative methodology, graduate training, labor-management relations

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.