Abstract and Keywords
Researchers have long been trying to elucidate the nature of the criminal career by focusing on the average path or trajectory of offending over the life course. Some developmental theorists, most notably Terrie E. Moffitt (1993), proposed typologies, suggesting that people have fundamentally different paths and processes over the life course. Based on his theory, Moffitt classified individuals into non-offenders, life-course-persistent offenders and adolescence-limited offenders. Life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited offenders differ by the age of onset and by the time at which they exit from crime. In a 2003 paper, Robert J. Sampson and John H. Laub debunked the notion that there are life-course persisters and concluded that crime declines with age sooner or later for all offender groups. This article examines the evidence surrounding the theory put forward by Sampson and Laub and looks at some of the issues that arise when identifying and explaining life-course-persistent offenders.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.