Abstract and Keywords
Research on hope in organizations is still at an embryonic stage. Few scholars have taken up the challenge put forth by Ludema, Wilmot, and Srivastava (1997) in terms of making use of or furthering their evocative exposition of a vocabulary of hope for organization studies. Instead, there has been a tendency in much hope research to reduce hope to notions of individual goal-attainment. This treatment of hope threatens to confound the phenomenon with self-efficacy and optimism, downplays its relational dimension, neglects the open-ended qualities of experiencing in hope, and fails to see that hope is intimately related to imagination. Resurrecting hope as a key construct in organizational research demands a broadening of its conceptual underpinnings and methodological approaches. We review and contrast traditions of hope research and point to implications for more process-oriented approaches. The interplay between imagination and hope in hydrocarbon exploration is provided as an illustrative case.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.