Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 30 May 2020

Abstract and Keywords

The lack of Persian sources, both about the fall of the Achaemenid Empire and Seleucid rule in Iran, is an important issue for the Iranian history of this period. All available records being in Greek and Latin, there is a stark absence of the defeated side's (Persian) perspective. Also, while there exists ample record of Alexander's conquest of Iran, the same is not true for the Selueucid period. Alexander's invasion of the Persian empire was the result of political antagonism between the two empires, in the previous two centuries. Both Darius III and Alexander, borne out of internal turmoil of Persia and Greece, respectively, after a long drawn war, spread out across Asia minor, fought the decisive battle at Gaugamela, which resulted in a total Persian defeat. The destruction of the Persepolis, as a reprimand, etched a gross memory in the Persian psyche, enabling a negative profile of Alexander forever.

Keywords: Seleucid, Alexander, political antagonism, Persepolis, negative profile, Guagamela

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.