Abstract and Keywords
This article discusses the settings in which beliefs systematically diverge from reality and identify impacts for bargaining behavior. It is organized around two categories of beliefs: those related to the structure of the negotiation and those germane to people in the negotiation. It also looks at two beliefs about the structure of negotiation: outside options and interests. Biases in these beliefs produce two large and systematic errors, the small pie bias and the fixed pie bias. It then describes the systematic biases that arise in the process of anticipating and learning about a negotiation counterpart. Erroneous beliefs about counterparts might be based on stereotypes, reputations, and general beliefs that negotiators hold about human nature. The small pie bias may possibly exist along with the misperception of personality. It finally offers some ideas and suggestions of where negotiation judgments research might be headed.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.