- Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics
- [UNTITLED]
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Status and Definition of Compounding
- Compounding and Idiomatology
- The Classification of Compounds
- Early Generative Approaches
- A Lexical Semantic Approach to Compounding
- Compounding in the Parallel Architecture and Conceptual Semantics
- Compounding in Distributed Morphology
- Why are Compounds a Part of Human Language? A View from Asymmetry Theory
- Compounding and Lexicalism
- Compounding and Construction Morphology
- Compounding from an Onomasiological Perspective
- Compounding in Cognitive Linguistics
- Psycholinguistic Perspectives
- Meaning Predictability of Novel Context-Free Compounds
- Children's Acquisition of Compound Constructions
- Diachronic Perspectives
- Typology of Compounds
- IE, Germanic: English
- IE, Germanic: Dutch
- IE, Germanic: German
- IE, Germanic: Danish
- IE, Romance: French
- IE, Romance: Spanish
- IE, Hellenic: Modern Greek
- IE, Slavonic: Polish
- Sino-Tibetan: Mandarin Chinese
- Afro-Asiatic, Semitic: Hebrew
- Isolate: Japanese
- Uralic, Finno-Ugric: Hungarian
- Athapaskan: Slave
- Iroquoian: Mohawk
- Arawakan: Maipure-Yavitero
- Araucanian: Mapudungun
- Pama-Nyungan: Warlpiri
- References
- Index
Abstract and Keywords
The Chomskyan revolution had an almost immediate impact on the study of compounding, because one of the first works devoted primarily to applying, rather than developing, the theoretical framework addressed the issue of the analysis of compounding quite prominently. This work (Lees 1960) also set the agenda for generative research on compounding for more or less two decades. It is this period that is the focus of the present chapter. Section 4.1 starts by presenting Lees' seminal work, setting out the main points of its analysis as well as its theoretical context and the immediate reactions it provoked. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, research in generative linguistics was determined by the conflict between generative semantics and the Chomskyan response to it. The field of compounding was not exempt. The two opposing viewpoints and their consequences for compounding are discussed in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, respectively. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, a gradual reorientation was observed, resulting in a change of research questions. This process and the legacy of the preceding period are described in Section 4.4.
Keywords: Chomsky, compounding, Lees, generative linguistics, semantics
Pius Ten Hacken is senior lecturer at Swansea University. He is the author of Defining Morphology (Hildesheim: Olms, 1994) and a number of articles in the domains of theoretical and computational morphology. He is also the author of Chomskyan Linguistics and its Competitors (London: Equinox, 2007) and the editor of Terminology, Computing and Translation (Tübingen: Narr, 2006).
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
Please subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.
For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.
- Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics
- [UNTITLED]
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Status and Definition of Compounding
- Compounding and Idiomatology
- The Classification of Compounds
- Early Generative Approaches
- A Lexical Semantic Approach to Compounding
- Compounding in the Parallel Architecture and Conceptual Semantics
- Compounding in Distributed Morphology
- Why are Compounds a Part of Human Language? A View from Asymmetry Theory
- Compounding and Lexicalism
- Compounding and Construction Morphology
- Compounding from an Onomasiological Perspective
- Compounding in Cognitive Linguistics
- Psycholinguistic Perspectives
- Meaning Predictability of Novel Context-Free Compounds
- Children's Acquisition of Compound Constructions
- Diachronic Perspectives
- Typology of Compounds
- IE, Germanic: English
- IE, Germanic: Dutch
- IE, Germanic: German
- IE, Germanic: Danish
- IE, Romance: French
- IE, Romance: Spanish
- IE, Hellenic: Modern Greek
- IE, Slavonic: Polish
- Sino-Tibetan: Mandarin Chinese
- Afro-Asiatic, Semitic: Hebrew
- Isolate: Japanese
- Uralic, Finno-Ugric: Hungarian
- Athapaskan: Slave
- Iroquoian: Mohawk
- Arawakan: Maipure-Yavitero
- Araucanian: Mapudungun
- Pama-Nyungan: Warlpiri
- References
- Index