Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 19 October 2019

(p. 623) References

(p. 623) References

Achmanova, O. S. (1958). ‘Lexical and syntactic collocation in contemporary English’, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 1: 14–21.Find this resource:

Ackema, P. (1995). Syntax below Zero. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Find this resource:

—— (1999). Issues in Morphosyntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Find this resource:

—— and A. Neeleman (2004). Beyond Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Adams, V. (1973). An Introduction to Modern English Word Formation. London: Longman.Find this resource:

—— (2001). Complex Words in English. Harlow: Longman.Find this resource:

Adger, D. (2003). Stress and Phrasal Syntax. GLOW abstract.Find this resource:

Agathopoulou, E. (2003). ‘On functional features in second language acquisition of nominal compounds: Evidence from the Greek—English Interlanguage’, in J. M. Liceras (ed.) Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference. (GASLA 2002). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 1–8.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (1998). ‘Warekena’, in D. C. Derbyshire and G. K. Pullum (eds.) Handbook of Amazonian Languages 4. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 225–439.Find this resource:

—— (2003). A Grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Aitchison, J. (1996). The Seeds of Speech. Language Origin and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2003). Words in the Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Alegre, M. A. and P. Gordon (1996). ‘Red rats eater exposes recursion in children's word formation’, Cognition 60: 65–82.Find this resource:

Alinei, M. (1995). ‘Theoretical aspects of lexical motivation’, Svenska Landsmål och Svenskt Folkliv 118/321: 1–10.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘Principi di teoria motivazionale (iconomia) e di lessicologia motivazionale (iconomastica)’, in L. Mucciante and T. Telmon (eds.) Lessicologia e Lessicografia: Atti del Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia. Roma: Il Calamo, 11–36.Find this resource:

Allan, K. (1977). ‘Classifiers’, Language 53: 285–311.Find this resource:

Allan, R., P. Holmes, and T. LundskÆr-Nielsen (1995). Danish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London and New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Allen, M. R. (1978). ‘Morphological investigations.’ PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Find this resource:

Alpher, B. (2004). ‘Appendix 5.1 Proto-Pama-Nyungan etyma’, in C. Bowern and H. Koch (eds.) Australian Languages: Classification and the Comparative Method. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 387–570.Find this resource:

Anderson, S. R. (1982). ‘Where's morphology?’ Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.Find this resource:

—— (1985). ‘Typological distinctions in word formation’, in S. Timothy (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description 3: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 150–201.Find this resource:

—— (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 624) Andrews, S. (1986). ‘Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects?’ Journal of Memory and Language 25: 726–40.Find this resource:

—— B. Miller, and K. Rayner (2004). ‘Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap’, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16: 285–311.Find this resource:

Angenot-de Lima, G. (2001). ‘Description phonologique, grammaticale et lexicale du Moré, langue amazonienne de Bolivie et du Brésil.’ PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Find this resource:

Anglin, J. M. (1993). ‘Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58: 1–165.Find this resource:

Anichkov, I. E. (1992). ‘Idiomatika i semantika: zametki, predstavlennye A. Meye, 1927’, Voprosy jazykoznanija 41(1): 136–50.Find this resource:

Arnold, I. V. (1966). Lexikologija sovremennogo anglijskogo jazyka. Moscow/Leningrad: Vysšaja Škola.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1994). Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Assink, E. M. H. and D. Sandra (2003). Reading Complex Words: Cross-Language Studies. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.Find this resource:

Augst, Gerhard (1975). ‘Über das Fugenmorphem bei Zusammensetzungen’, in G. Augst (ed.) Untersuchungen zum Morpheminventar der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Narr, 71–155.Find this resource:

Augusta, F. J. de (1903). Gramática Araucana. Valdivia: Imprenta Central, J. Lampert.Find this resource:

Baayen, H. R., T. Dijkstra, and R. Schreuder (1997). ‘Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model’, Journal of Memory and Language 37: 94–117.Find this resource:

—— L. B. Feldman, and R. Schreuder (2006). ‘Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words’, Journal of Memory and Language 55: 290–313.Find this resource:

—— R. Piepenbrock, and H. van Rijn (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-Rom). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Find this resource:

—— and R. Schreuder (2003). Morphological Structure in Language Processing. Berlin: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— R., F. J. Tweedie, and R. Schreuder (2002). ‘The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon’, Brain and Language 81: 55–65.Find this resource:

Bader, F. (1962). La formation des composes nominaux du latin. Paris: Annales Littéraires de lʼUniversité de Besançon.Find this resource:

Bahns, J. (1993). Lexical collocations: A contrastive view. English Language Teacher Journal 47(1): 56–63.Find this resource:

Baker, B. (2006). ‘Compounds, names, and nominal phrases in Australian languages.’ Paper presented at Australian Languages Workshop, Blackwood-by-the-beach, Pearl Beach, NSW.Find this resource:

Baker, M. C. (1988). Incorporation. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1996). The Polysynthesis Parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘External possession in Mohawk’, in D. Payne and I. Barshi (eds.) External Possession. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 293–324.Find this resource:

—— (2003). Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘On zero-agreement and polysynthesis’, in P. Ackema, P. Brandt, M. Schoorlemmer and F. Weerman (eds.) Arguments and Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289–320.Find this resource:

(p. 625) —— R. Aranovich, and L. A. Golluscio (2005). ‘Two types of syntactic noun incorporation’, Language 81: 138–76.Find this resource:

Bally, C. (1950). Linguistique générate et linguistique française, 2nd edn. Berne: Francke.Find this resource:

Bar-Ilan, L. and R. A. Berman (2007). ‘Developing register differentiation: The Latinate-Germanic divide in English’, Linguistics 45(1): 1–36.Find this resource:

Baroni, M., E. Guevara, and V. Pirrelli (2007). ‘Sulla tipologia dei composti N + N in italiano’, in Atti del 4oesimo Congresso della SLI. Rome: Bulzoni.Find this resource:

Barz, I. (2005). ‘Die Wortbildung’, in Duden: Die Grammatik, 7th edn. Mannheim etc.: Dudenverlag, 641–772.Find this resource:

Basbøll, H. (2005). The Phonology of Danish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bassac, C. (2006). ‘A compositional treatment for English compounds’, Research in Language 4: 133–53.Find this resource:

Bat-El, O. (1993). ‘Parasitic metrification in the Modern Hebrew stress system’, The Linguistic Review 10: 189–210.Find this resource:

Bates, E., S. DʼAmico, T. Jacobsen, et al. (2003). ‘Timed picture naming in seven languages’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10: 344–80.Find this resource:

Bauer, B. (2007). ‘Nominal apposition in Indo-European: Development and function.’ Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, University of Joensuu, Finland, 30 August –1 September 2007.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (1978). The Grammar of Nominal Compounding. Odense: Odense University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1980) ‘Deux problèmes au sujet des noms composés comprenant un premier élément verbal en francais moderne’, Le Français moderne 3: 219–24.Find this resource:

—— (1983). English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1988). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1998a). ‘Is there a class of neoclassical compounds, and if so is it productive?’ Linguistics 36(3): 403–22.Find this resource:

—— (1998b). ‘When is a sequence of noun + noun a compound in English?’ English Language and Linguistics 2: 65–86.Find this resource:

—— (2001a). Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2001b). ‘Compounding’, in M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, and W. Raible (eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 695–707.Find this resource:

—— (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2008a). ‘Les composés exocentriques de lʼanglais’, in D. Amiot (ed.) La composition dans une perspective typologique. Arras: Artois Presses Université, 35–47.Find this resource:

—— (2008b). ‘Dvandva’, Word Structure 1: 1–20.Find this resource:

—— and A. Renouf (2001). ‘A corpus-based study of compounding in English’, Journal of English Linguistics 29: 101–23.Find this resource:

—— and R. Huddleston (2002). ‘Lexical Word-Formation’, in R. Huddleston and J. K. Pullum (eds.) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1621–722.Find this resource:

Baynes, K. and M. S. Gazzamga (2005). ‘Lateralization of language: Toward a biologically based model of language’, The Linguistic Review 22: 303–26.Find this resource:

Beard, R. (1981). The Indo-European Lexicon: A Full Synchronic Theory. North-Holland Linguistic Series 44. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

(p. 626) —— (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. SUNY Series in Linguistics. State University of New York Press.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Derivation’, in A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.) The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 44–65.Find this resource:

Becker, J. A. (1994). ‘“Sneak-shoes”, “sworders” and “nose-beards”: A case study of lexical innovation’, First Language 14: 195–211.Find this resource:

Becker, T. (1992). ‘Compounding in German’, Rivista di Linguistica 4: 5–36.Find this resource:

—— (1994). ‘Back-formation, cross-formation, and “Bracketing Paradoxes” in Paradigmatic Morphology’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1993. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–26.Find this resource:

Benczes, R. (2006). Creative Compounding in English. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Benmamoun, E. (2000). ‘Agreement asymmetries and the PF interface’, in J. Lecarme, J. Loewenstam, and U. Shlonsky (eds.) Studies in Afroasiatic Grammar 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bentin, S. and L. B. Feldman (1990). ‘The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 42: 693–711.Find this resource:

Benveniste, É. (1966). ‘Formes nouvelles de la composition nominale’, Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 61: 82–95.Find this resource:

Berg, H. van den (2004). ‘Hunzib (North-East Caucasian)’, in G. Booij, Ch. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, and S. Skopeteas (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology 2. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter, 1367–75.Find this resource:

Berman, R. A. (1985). ‘Acquisition of Hebrew’, in D. I. Slobin (ed.) The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisiton 1: Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 255–371.Find this resource:

—— (1986). ‘The acquisition of morphology/syntax: A crosslinguistic perspective’, in P. Fletcher and M. Garman (eds.) Language Acquisition, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 429–47.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘A developmental route: Learning about the form and use of complex nominals’, Linguistics 27: 1057–85.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘Language knowledge and language use: Binomial constructions in Modern Hebrew’, General Linguistics 28: 261–85.Find this resource:

—— (1993a). ‘Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues’, in Y. Levy (ed.) Other Children, Other Languages: Issues in the Theory of Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 189–241.Find this resource:

—— (1993b). ‘Crosslinguistic perspectives on native language acquisition’, in K. Hyltenstam and A. Viberg (eds.) Progression and Regression in Language: Sociocultural, Neuro-psychological, and Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 245–66.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Children's innovative verbs vs nouns: Structured elicitations and spontaneous coinages’, in L. Menn and N. Bernstein-Ratner (eds.) Methods for Studying Language Production. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 69–93.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Children's lexical innovations: Developmental perspectives on Hebrew verb-structure’, in J. Shimron (ed.) Language Processing and Language Acquisition in a Root-Based Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 243–91.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition’, in R. A. Berman (ed.) Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 9–34.Find this resource:

(p. 627) —— and E. V. Clark (1989). ‘Learning to use compounds for contrast’, First Language 9: 247–70.Find this resource:

—— and B. Nir-Sagiv (2004). ‘Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development’, Journal of Child Language 31: 339–80.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox’, Discourse Processes 43(2): 79–120.Find this resource:

—— (in press). ‘Clause-packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study’, in J. Guo, et al. (eds.) Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan L Slobin. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Chapter 11.Find this resource:

—— and D. Ravid (1986). ‘Lexicalization of noun compounds’, Hebrew Linguistics 24: 5–22. [in Hebrew]Find this resource:

—— and Y. Sagi (1981). ‘Children's word-formation and lexical innovations’, Hebrew Computational Linguistics Bulletin 18: 1–62. [in Hebrew]Find this resource:

—— and D. I. Slobin (1994). Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Bertram, R., R. H. Baayen, and R. Schreuder (2000). ‘Effects of family size for complex words’, Journal of Memory and Language 42: 390–405.Find this resource:

Bertram, R. and J. HyÖnÄ (2003). ‘The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds’, Journal of Memory and Language 43(3): 615–34.Find this resource:

Betz, W. (1949). Deutsch und Lateinisch: Die Lehnbildungen der althochdeutschen Benediktinerregel. Bonn: Bouvier.Find this resource:

Bickerton, D. (1990). Language and Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Bierwisch, M. and K. E. Heidolph (eds.) (1970). Progress in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Bilev, R. (1985). ‘Development in Use of Noun Compounds by Hebrew-Speaking Children.’ Tel Aviv University: Unpublished Master's thesis. [in Hebrew]Find this resource:

Billings, L. A. (1998). ‘Morphology and syntax: Delimiting stump compounds in Russian’, in G. Booij, A. Ralli, and S. Scalise (eds.) Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM1) (Mytilene, 19–21 September 1997). Patras: University of Patras, 99–111.Find this resource:

Bisetto, A. (1994). ‘Italian compounds of the “accendigas” type: a case of endocentric formations?’ in P. Bouillon and D. Estival (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Compound Nouns: Multilingual Aspects of Nominal Composition. Ginevra: ISSCO, 77–87.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Note sui composti VN dellʼitaliano’, in P. Benincà, A. Mioni, and L. Vanelli (eds.) Fonologia e morfologia dellʼitaliano e dei dialetti dʼLtalia. Atti del XXXI Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana. Roma: Bulzoni, 503–38.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Sulla nozione di composto sintetico e i composti VN’, in V. Orioles (ed.) Dal ‘paradigma’ alla parola. Riflessioni sul metalinguaggio della linguistica. Roma: Il Calamo, 235–56.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Note su alcuni composti nominali dellʼitaliano’, in A. Bisetto, C. Iacobini, and A. M. Thornton (eds.) Scritti di morfologia in onore di Sergio Scalise in occasione del suo 60° compleanno. Cesena: Caissa Italia, 29–46.Find this resource:

—— and S. Scalise (2005). ‘The classification of compounds’, Lingue e Linguaggio 4(2): 319–32.Find this resource:

Blank, A. (1997a). Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

—— (1997b). ‘Outlines of a cognitive approach to word-formation’, in Proceedings of the 16th Lnternational Congress of Linguists. Oxford: Pergamon, Paper No. 0291.Find this resource:

(p. 628) Blom, C. (2005). Complex Predicates in Dutch. Synchrony and Diachrony. Utrecht: LOT.Find this resource:

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.Find this resource:

Bonami, O. and G. BoyÉ (2003). ‘Supplétion et classes flexionnelles dans la conjugaison du français’, Language 152: 102–26.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Subregular defaults in French conjugation.’ Paper presented at 12th International Morphology Meeting, 2006 May 25–29, Budapest.Find this resource:

—— and F. Kerleroux (2008). ‘Lʼallomorphie radicale et la relation flexion-construction’, in B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux, and M. Plénat (eds.) Aperçus de morphologie du français. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Find this resource:

Bongartz, C. (2002). Noun Combination in Interlanguage. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (1985). ‘Coordination reduction in complex words: A case for prosodic phonology’, in H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.) Advances in Non-Linear Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris, 143–60.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘The relation between inheritance and argument linking: Deverbal nouns in Dutch’, in M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybregts, and M. Trommelen (eds.) Morphology and Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris, 57–74.Find this resource:

—— (1990). ‘The boundary between morphology and syntax: separable complex verbs in Dutch’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1990. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 45–63.Find this resource:

—— (1992). ‘Compounding in Dutch’, Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 37–60.Find this resource:

—— (1995) The Phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

—— (1996). ‘Inherent versus contextual inflection and the Split Morphology Hypothesis’, in G. E. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–16.Find this resource:

—— (2002a). The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2002b). ‘Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch lexicon’, Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 301–27.Find this resource:

—— (2005a). The Grammar of Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2005b). ‘Compounding and derivation: Evidence for Construction Morphology’, in W. U. Dressler et al. (eds.) Morphology and Its Demarcation: Selected Papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 109–32.Find this resource:

—— (2007). The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Jerzy Rubach (1987). ‘Postcyclic vs. postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology’, Linguistic Inquiry 18: 1–44.Find this resource:

—— and A. van Santen (1998). Morfologie. De woordstructuur van het Nederlands. 2egeheel herziene en uitgebreide druk. Amsterdam: AUP.Find this resource:

Borer, H. (1988). ‘On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 45–65.Find this resource:

—— (1996). ‘The Construct in review’, in J. Lecarme, J. Loewenstam, and U. Shlonsky (eds.) Studies in Afroasiatic Grammar. Holland Academic Graphics, 30–61.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Morphology and syntax’, in A. Spencer and A. F. Zwicky (eds.) The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford / Malden, MA: Blackwell, 151–90.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Deconstructing the Construct’, in K. Johnson and I. Roberts (eds.) Beyond Principles and Parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 43–90.Find this resource:

(p. 629) —— (2003). ‘Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon’, in J. Moore and M. Polinsky (eds.), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory. Chicago: CSLI and University of Chicago Press, 31–66.Find this resource:

—— (2005a). Structuring Sense, Vol. I: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2005b). Structuring Sense, Vol. II: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2008). ‘The morphological stratum—some considerations from Hebrew compounds.’ Ms., University of Southern California.Find this resource:

—— (forthcoming). Structuring Sense, Vol. III: Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Borowsky, T. (1990). Topics in the Lexical Phonology of English. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Bosque, I. (1990). Las categorías gramaticales. Relaciones y diferencias. Madrid: Síntesis.Find this resource:

Botha, R. P. (1968). The Function of the Lexicon in Transformational Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— (1980). ‘Word-based morphology and synthetic compounding’, Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, no. 5, University of Stellenbosch.Find this resource:

—— (1981) ‘A base rule theory of Afrikaans synthetic compounding’, in M. Moortgat and T. Hoekstra (eds.) The Scope of Lexical Rules. Dordrecht: Foris, 1–77.Find this resource:

—— (1984). Morphological Mechanisms. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Find this resource:

Botwinik-Rotem, I. and A. Terzi (2008). ‘Greek and Hebrew locative prepositional phrases: A unified Case-driven account’, Lingua 118(3): 399–424.Find this resource:

Bouchard, D. (2002). Adjectives, Number and Interfaces: Why Languages Vary. London: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Bowerman, M. and S. Choi (2001). ‘Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories’, in M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds.) Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 475–511.Find this resource:

Bradley, D. (1980). ‘Lexical representation of derivational relation’, in M. Arnoff and M. L. Kean (eds.) Juncture. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri, 37–55.Find this resource:

Breindl, E. and M. Thurmair (1992). ‘Der Fürstbischof im Hosenrock. Eine Studie zu den nominalen Kopulativkomposita’, Deutsche Sprache 20: 32–61.Find this resource:

Brekle, H. E. (1970). Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der Englischen Nominalkomposition. Munich: Fink.Find this resource:

—— (1976). Generative Satzsemantik im System der englischen Nominal Komposition. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Find this resource:

—— (1986). ‘The production and interpretation of ad hoc nominal compounds in German: A realistic approach’, Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36: 39–52.Find this resource:

—— and D. Kastovsky (1977). ‘Introduction,’ in H. E. Brekle and D. Kastovsky (eds.) Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung. Beiträge zum Wuppertaler Wortbildungskolloquium vom 9.-10. Juli 1975. Anläβlich des 70. Geburtstages von Hans Marchand am 1. Oktober 1977. Wuppertaler Schriftenreihe Linguistik 1. Bonn: Bouvier, 7–19.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. and S. Mchombo (1995). ‘The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 181–254.Find this resource:

Browning, R. (1969). Medieval and Modern Greek. London: Hutchinson.Find this resource:

Brucart, J. M. (1987). La elisión sintáctica en español. Barcelona: Bellaterra.Find this resource:

Brugmann, K. (1889). Grundriβ der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen, Vol. 2.1: Wortbildungslehre (Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre). Strasbourg: Trübner.Find this resource:

(p. 630) —— (1900). ‘Über das Wesen der sogenannten Wortzusammensetzungen. Eine sprachpsychologische Studie’, Berichte über die Verhandlungen der königlichsächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, philologischhistorische Classe 52: 359–401.Find this resource:

Bundgaard, P. F., S. Ostergaard, and F. Stjernfelt (2006). ‘Waterproof fire stations? Conceptual schemata and cognitive operations involved in compound constructions’, Semiotica 8: 363–93.Find this resource:

Burani, C. and A. Caramazza (1987). ‘Representation and processing of derived words’, Language & Cognitive Processes 2: 217–27.Find this resource:

—— D. Salmaso, and A. Caramazza (1984). ‘Morphological structure and lexical access’, Visible Language 18: 342–52.Find this resource:

Burton-Roberts, N. (1997). Analysing Sentences, 2nd edn. Harlow: Longman.Find this resource:

Busa, F. (1997). ‘Compositionality and the semantics of nominals.’ PhD dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, Brandeis University.Find this resource:

Butterworth, B. (1983). ‘Lexical representation’, in B. Butterworth (ed.) Language Production. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 257–94.Find this resource:

Buzássyová, Klára (1974). Sémantická štruktúra slovenských deverbatív. Bratislava: Veda.Find this resource:

Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘Regular morphology and the lexicon’, Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 425–55.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition’, Language 82: 711–34.Find this resource:

Cacciari, C. and P. Tabossi (1988). ‘The comprehension of idioms’, Journal of Memory and Language 27: 668–83.Find this resource:

Cameron-Faulkner, T., E. V. M. Lieven, and M. Tomasello (2003). ‘A construction-based analysis of child-directed speech’, Cognitive Science 27: 843–74.Find this resource:

Campbell, L. (1985). The Pipil Language of El Salvador. Berlin / New York / Amsterdam: Mouton.Find this resource:

Caramazza, A., A. Laudanna, and C. Romani (1988). ‘Lexical access and inflectional morphology’, Cognition 28: 297–332.Find this resource:

—— G. Miceli, M. C. Silveri, and A. Laudanna (1985). ‘Reading mechanisms and the organisation of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dyslexia’, Cognitive Neuropsychology 2: 81–114.Find this resource:

Carlisle, J. F. (2000). ‘Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading’, Reading and Writing 12: 169–90.Find this resource:

Carlson, G. (2003). ‘Interpretive asymmetries in major phrases’, in A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.) Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. 2: Morphology, Phonology, and Acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 301–15.Find this resource:

Carnie, A. (2000). ‘On the definition of X° and XP’, Syntax 3(2): 59–106.Find this resource:

Carr, C. T. (1939). Nominal Compounds in Germanic. London: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2002). An Introduction to English Morphology: Words and their Structure. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Phrases inside compounds: A puzzle for lexicon-free morphology’, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(3): 34–42.Find this resource:

Ceccagno, A. and B. Basciano (2007). ‘Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms’, Morphology 17(2): 207–31.Find this resource:

—— (forthcoming b). ‘Complessità della morfologia del cinese’, Atti dellʼXI convegno AISC, Rome 22–24 February 2007.Find this resource:

(p. 631) —— and S. Scalise (2006). ‘Classification, structure and headedness of Chinese compounds’, Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 233–60.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Composti del cinese: analisi delle strutture e identificazione della testa’, in A. Palermo (ed.) La Cina e Iʼaltro. Naples: Università degli studi di Napoli ‘LʼOrientale’, 503–43.Find this resource:

Chang, C. H. (1998). ‘V-V compounds in Mandarin Chinese: Argument structure and semantics’, in J. Packard (ed.) New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–101.Find this resource:

Chao, Y. R. (1948). Mandarin Primer: An Intensive Course in Spoken Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley / Los Angeles: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Cheng, L. L. (1997). ‘Resultative compounds and lexical relational structures’, Chinese Languages and Linguistics 3: Morphology and Lexicon: 167–97.Find this resource:

—— and Huang, J. C. T. (1994). ‘On the argument structure of resultative compounds’, in M. Y. Chenand and O. L. Tzeng (eds.) In Honour of William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change. Taipei: Pyramid Press, 187–221.Find this resource:

Chi, T. R. (1985). A Lexical Analysis of Verb-Noun Compounds in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: Crane.Find this resource:

Chierchia, G. (2001). ‘A puzzle about indefinites’, in C. Ceccetto, G. Chierchia, and M. T. Guasti (eds.) Semantic Interfaces: Reference, Anaphora and Aspect. Stanford: CSLI.Find this resource:

Childs, T. G. (1995). A Grammar of Kisi. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Den Haag: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1970). ‘Remarks on nominalization’, in R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn, 184–221Find this resource:

. (Reprinted in

N. Chomsky (1972) Studies in Semantics in Generative Grammar. Den Haag: Mouton, 11–61Find this resource:

.)

—— (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

—— (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Find this resource:

—— (1995a). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1995b). ‘Bare Phrase Structure’, in G. Webelhuth (ed.) Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 383–439.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework’, in R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honour of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–59.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Derivation by phase’, in M. Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Three factors in language design’, Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22.Find this resource:

—— and M. Halle (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Find this resource:

Cienki, A. (2007). ‘Frames, idealized cognitive models, and domains’, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 170–87.Find this resource:

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘On Greenberg's Universal 20 and the Semitic DP.’ Handout of a paper presented at the Antisymmetry Conference, Cortona.Find this resource:

(p. 632) Clackson, J. (2002). ‘Composition in Indo-European languages’, Transactions of the Philological Society 100(2): 163–167.Find this resource:

Clahsen, H. and M. Almazan (2001). ‘Compounding and inflection in language impairment: Evidence from Williams Syndrome (and SLI)’, Lingua 111: 729–57.Find this resource:

—— G. Marcus, S. Bartke, and R. Wiese (1996). ‘Compounding and inflections in German child language’, Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 115–42.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. (1981). ‘Lexical innovations: How children learn to create new words’, in W. Deutsch (ed.) The Child's Construction of Language. New York: Academic Press, 299–328.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘Lexical creativity in French-speaking children’, Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 17: 513–30.Find this resource:

—— (1993). The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— and B. J. S. Barron (1988). ‘A thrower button or a button thrower? Children's judgments of grammatical and ungrammatical noun compounds’, Linguistics 26: 3–19.Find this resource:

—— and R. A. Berman (1984). ‘Structure and use in acquisition of word-formation’, Language 60: 542–90.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns’, Journal of Child Language 14: 547–68.Find this resource:

—— and H. H. Clark (1979). ‘When nouns surface as verbs’, Language 4: 767–811.Find this resource:

—— S. A. Gelman, and N. M. Lane (1985). ‘Compound nouns and category structure in young children’, Child Development 56: 84–94.Find this resource:

—— and B. F. Hecht (1982). ‘Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns’, Cognition 12: 1–24.Find this resource:

—— and R. Mulford (1986). ‘Acquiring complex compounds: Affixes and word order in English’, Linguistics 24: 7–29.Find this resource:

Cohen, B. and G. L. Murphy (1984). ‘Models of concepts’, Cognitive Science 8: 27–58.Find this resource:

Collins, C. (2002). ‘Eliminating labels’, in S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.) Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell, 42–64.Find this resource:

Contreras, H. (1985) ‘Spanish exocentric compounds’, in F. Nuessel (ed.) Current Issues in Hispanic Phonology and Morphology. Bloomington, IN: IULC, 14–26.Find this resource:

Corbett, G. and N. M. Fraser (1993). ‘Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection’, Journal of Linguistics 29: 113–42.Find this resource:

Corbin, D. (1987). Morphologie dérivationelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

—— (1992). ‘Hypothèse sur les frontières de la composition nominale’, Cahiers de grammaire 17: 25–55.Find this resource:

Coseriu, E. (1973). Einführung in die strukturelle Betrachtung des Wortschatzes. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

—— (1977). ‘Inhaltliche Wortbildungslehre (am Beispiel des Typs “coupe-papier”)’, in H. E. Brekle and D. Kastovsky (eds.) Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung. Beiträge zum Wuppertaler Wortbildungskolloquium vom 9.-10. Juli 1975. Anläβlich des 70. Geburtstages von Hans Marchand am 1. Oktober 1977. Wuppertaler Schriftenreihe Linguistik 1. Bonn: Bouvier, 48–61.Find this resource:

Costello, F. J. (1996). ‘Noun-noun conceptual combination. The polysemy of compound phrases’. PhD dissertation, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Ireland.Find this resource:

—— and M. T. Keane (1997). ‘Polysemy in conceptual combination: Testing the constraint theory of combination’, in M. G. Shafto and P. Langley (eds.) Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 137–42.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Efficient creativity: Constraints on conceptual combination’, Cognitive Science 24(2): 299–349.Find this resource:

(p. 633) —— (2001). ‘Testing two theories of conceptual combination: Alignment versus diagnosticity in the comprehension and production of combined concepts’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 27(1): 255–71.Find this resource:

Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Creissels, D. (2004). ‘Bambara’, in P. J. L. Arnaud (ed.) Le nom composé: données sur seize Langages. Lyons: Presses universitaires de Lyon, 21–46.Find this resource:

Croft, W. and A. Cruse (2003). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Crystal, D. (2003). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, fifth edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Culicover, P. W. and R. Jackendoff (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A Linguistic Study of a Modern-day ‘Wild Child’. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

DʼAchille, P. and A. M. Thornton (2003). ‘La flessione del nome dallʼitaliano antico allʼitaliano contemporaneo’, in N. Maraschio and T. Poggi Salani (eds.) Italia linguistica anno Mille—Italia linguistica anno Duemila. Roma: Bulzoni, 211–30.Find this resource:

Dai, X-L. J. (1992). ‘Chinese morphology and its interface with the syntax’. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Find this resource:

Dalalakis, J. and M. Gopnik (1995). ‘Lexical representation of Greek compounds: Evidence from Greek developmentally language impaired individuals’, in D. MacLaughlin and S. M. McEwen (eds.) Proceedings of BUCLD 19: 192–303.Find this resource:

Danon, G. (2001). ‘Syntactic definiteness in the grammar of Modern Hebrew’, Linguistics 39(6): 1071–116.Find this resource:

—— (2008a). ‘Definiteness agreement with PP modifiers’, in S. Armon-Lotem, G. Danon, and S. Rothstein (eds.) Generative Approaches to Hebrew Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (2008b). ‘Definiteness spreading in the Hebrew Construct State’, Lingua 118: 872–906.Find this resource:

Darmesteter, A. (1894). Traité de la formations des mots composé dans la langue française, 2nd edn. Paris: Honoré Champion.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. (1967). ‘The Logical Form of action sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.) The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 105–22.Find this resource:

Davidson, M. (2002). ‘Studies in Southern Wakashan (Nootkan) grammar.’ PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Find this resource:

Davis, A. R. and J-P. Koenig (2000). ‘Linking as constraint on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon’, Language 76: 56–109.Find this resource:

Dayley, J. P. (1989). Tümpisa (Panamint) Shoshone Grammar. Berkeley / Los Angeles / Oxford: University of California Press.Find this resource:

De Jong, N. H., L. B. Feldman, R. Schreuder, M. Pastizzo, and H. R. Baayen (2002). ‘The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects’, Brain and Language 81: 555–67.Find this resource:

—— R. Schreuder, and H. R. Baayen (2000). ‘The morphological family size effect and morphology’, Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 329–65.Find this resource:

del Prado Martin, M. F., A. Deutsch, R. Frost, R. Schreuder, N. H. De Jong, and H. R. Baayen (2005). ‘Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Dutch and Hebrew’, Journal of Memory and Language 53: 496–512.Find this resource:

(p. 634) Demirdache, H. and M. Uribe-Etxebarria (1997). ‘The syntax of temporal relations: A uniform approach to tense and aspect’, in E. Curtis, J. Lyle, and G. Webster (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 145–59.Find this resource:

Den Dikken, M. (1995). Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic, and Causative Constructions. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Derwing, B. L. and R. Skousen (1989). ‘Morphology in the mental lexicon: A new look at analogy’, in G. Booij and J. Van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 2. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 55–71.Find this resource:

Diderichsen, P. (1972). Essentials of Danish Grammar. Copenhagen: Akademisk.Find this resource:

Dietrich, R. (2002). Psycholinguistik. Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler.Find this resource:

Diez, F. C. (1875). Romanische Wortschöpfung. Anhang zur Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen. Bonn.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. J. (1983). The Turkana Language. Dordrecht and Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris.Find this resource:

—— and M. Noske (2004). ‘Turkana (Nilotic)’, in G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, and S. Skopeteas (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology 2. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter, 1507–17.Find this resource:

Dirven, R. and M. Verspoor (1998). Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

DiSciullo, A-M. (1992a). ‘On the properties of Romance and Germanic deverbal compounds’, in E. Fava (ed.) Proceedings of the 17th Meeting of Generative Grammar. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier, 191–210.Find this resource:

—— (1992b). ‘Deverbal compounds and the external argument’, in I. Roca (ed.) Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, 65–78.Find this resource:

—— (1996). ‘Modularity and X°/XP Asymmetry’, Linguistic Analysis 23: 1–23.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘Prefixed-verbs and adjunct identification’, in A. M. DiSciullo (ed.) Projections and Interface Conditions: Essays in Modularity. New York: Oxford University Press, 52–73.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Local Asymmetry’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35: 25–49.Find this resource:

—— (2003a). ‘The asymmetry of morphology’, in P. Boucher (ed.) Many Morphologies. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 1–33.Find this resource:

—— (2003b). ‘Morphological relations in Asymmetry Theory’, in A. M. DiSciullo (ed.) Asymmetry in Grammar, vol. 2: Morphology, Phonology, and Acquisition. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 9–36.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Morphological Phases’, in J. Yoon (ed.) Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective: The 4th GLOW in Asia 2003. The Korean Generative Grammar Circle and Cognitive Science, Seoul National University, 113–37.Find this resource:

—— (2005a). Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (2005b). ‘Decomposing compounds’, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistic 2(3): 14–33.Find this resource:

—— (2005c). ‘Affixes at the edge’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics. Special 50th anniversary issue, 83–117.Find this resource:

—— (2007a). ‘On affixal scope and affix-root ordering in Italian’, in S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen, and M. Pinto (eds.) Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 99–114.Find this resource:

—— (2007b). ‘Decomposing compounds.’ Ms. Université du Québec à Montréal.Find this resource:

—— and D. P. Banksira (in press). ‘On wh-words of Ethiopian Semitic languages’, Proceedings of the 35th North American Conference on Afroasiatic Languages (NACAL 35).Find this resource:

—— and S. Fong (2005). ‘Morpho-syntax parsing’, in A. M. DiSciullo (ed.) UG and External Systems: Language, Brain and Computation. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 247–68.Find this resource:

(p. 635) —— and M. Landman (2007). ‘Morphological compositionality’, Revista Letras 42: 1–18.Find this resource:

—— and A. Ralli (1999). ‘Theta-role saturation in Greek compounds’, in A. Alexiadou et al. (eds.) Studies in Greek Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 185–200.Find this resource:

—— and N. Tomioka (2007). ‘Processing the object/adjunct asymmetry in Japanese verb compounds.’ Ms. UQAM.Find this resource:

—— and E. Williams (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (1986). ‘Noun classes and noun classification’, in C. Craig (ed.) Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 105–12.Find this resource:

Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (2003). ‘From DPs to NPs: A bare phrase structure account of genitives’, in M. Coene and Y. DʼHulst (eds.) From NP to DP, vol. 2: The Expression of Possession in Noun Phrases. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 75–120.Find this resource:

Dohmes, P. P. Zwitserlood, and J. BÖlte (2004). ‘The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming’, Brain and Language 90: 203–12.Find this resource:

Dokulil, M. (1962). Tvoření slov v češtině I. Teorie odvozování slov. Prague: Nakladatelství ČAV.Find this resource:

—— (1968). ‘Zur Theorie der Wortbildungslehre’, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig 17: 203–11.Find this resource:

—— (1978). ‘Kotázce prediktability lexikálního významu slovotvorně motivovaného slova’, Slovo a slovesnost 39: 244–51.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘The Prague School's theoretical and methodological contribution to “Wordformation” (Derivology)’, in Obsah—výraz—význam. Miloši Dokulilovi k 85. narozeninám. Prague: FF UK, 179–210.Find this resource:

Donalies, E. (2004). Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich: Kombinatorische Begriffsbildung, vol. 1: Substantivkomposition. Mannheim: Institut für deutsche Sprache.Find this resource:

—— (2005). Die Wortbildung im Deutschen, 2nd edn. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

Downing, P. (1977). ‘On the creation and use of English compound nouns’, Language 53: 810–42.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. R. (1991). ‘Thematic proto-roles and argument selection’, Language 67: 547–619.Find this resource:

Drachman, G. and A. Malikouti-Drachman (1994). ‘Stress and Greek compounding’, Phonologica 1992: 55–64.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. U. (1984). ‘Zur Wertung der InterWxe in einer semiotischen Theorie der natürlichen Morphologie’, Wiener Slavistischer Almanach 13: 35–45.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Towards a natural morphology of compounding’, Linguistics 45: 29–39.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Compound types’, in G. Libben and G. Jarema (eds) The Representation and Processing of Compound Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–44.Find this resource:

—— and M. LadÁnyi (2000). ‘Productivity in word formation (WF): A morphological approach’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47(1–2): 103–44.Find this resource:

—— G. Libben, J. Stark, C. Pons, and G. Jarema (2001). ‘The processing of interfixed German compounds’, Yearbook of Morphology 1999. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 185–220.Find this resource:

Dunabeitia, J. A., M. Perea, and M. Carreiras (2007). ‘The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14(6): 1171–6.Find this resource:

Dunkel, G. E. (1999). ‘On the origins of nominal composition in Indo-European’, in H. Eichner and H. C. Luschützky (with V. Sadovski) (eds.) Compositiones Indogermanicae in memoriam Jochem Schindler. Prague: Enigma, 47–68.Find this resource:

Eijk, Jan P. van (1997). The Lillooet Language: Phonology, Morphology, Syntax. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Find this resource:

(p. 636) Eisenberg, P. (1998). Grundriβ der deutschen Grammatik, vol. 1: Das Wort. Stuttgart / Weimar: Metzler.Find this resource:

Elsen, H. (2005). ‘Deutsche Konfixe’, Deutsche Sprache 33: 133–40.Find this resource:

Emonds, J. (1985). A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Engelhardt, M. (2000). ‘The projection of argument-taking nominals’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(1): 41–88.Find this resource:

Evans, N. (1995). A Grammar of Kayardild: With Historical-Comparative Notes on Tangkic. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Everett, D. L. (1998). ‘Wari (Amazonian)’, in A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds) The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford / Malden, MA: Blackwell, 690–706.Find this resource:

Evers, A. (1975). The Tranformational Cycle in Dutch and German. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Find this resource:

Fabb, N. (1984). ‘Syntactic affixation.’ PhD dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Compounding’, in A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.) Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 66–83.Find this resource:

Faiβ, K. (1981). ‘Compound, pseudo-compound, and syntactic group especially in English’, in P. Kunsmann and O. Kuhn (eds.) Weltsprache Englisch in Forschung und Lehre: Festschrift für Kurt Wächtler. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 132–50.Find this resource:

Fanselow, G. (1981). Zur Syntax und Semantik der Nominalkomposition: ein Versuch praktischer Anwendung der Montague-Grammatik auf die Wortbildung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

—— (1985). ‘What is a possible complex word?’, in J. Toman (ed.) Studies in German Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, 289–318.Find this resource:

Fasold, R. W. A. (1969). ‘Noun compounding in Thai.’ Mimeographed abridged version of 1968 University of Chicago PhD Dissertation.Find this resource:

Fauconnier, G. (1990). ‘Domains and connections’, Cognitive Linguistics 1: 151–74.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Mental spaces’, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 351–76.Find this resource:

—— and M. Turner (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Feldman, L. B. (1991). ‘The contribution of morphology to word recognition’, Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 53: 33–41.Find this resource:

Fernando, C. (1996). Idioms and Idiomaticity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ferris, C. (1993). The Meaning of Syntax: A Study in the Adjectives of English. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Fikkert, P. (2001). ‘Compounds triggering prosodic development’, in J. Weissenborn and B. Höhle (eds.) Approaches to Bootstrapping: Phonological, Lexical, Syntactic and Neurophysiological Aspects of Early Language Acquisition, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 59–86.Find this resource:

Fillenbaum, S. (1971). ‘Psycholinguistics’, Annual Review of Psychology 22: 251–308.Find this resource:

Fillmore, C. (1968). ‘The case for Case’, in E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1–90.Find this resource:

Fiorentino, R. and D. Poeppel (2007). ‘Compound words and structure in the lexicon’, Language and Cognitive Processes 12: 1–48.Find this resource:

Fleischer, W. (1969). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.Find this resource:

—— (1975). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 4th, revised edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

(p. 637) —— (2000). ‘Die Klassifikation von Wortbildungsprozessen’, in G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds.) Morphologie / Morphology. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter, 886–97.Find this resource:

—— and I. Barz (1992). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Flores dʼArcais, G. B. and Saito, H. (1993). ‘Lexical decomposition of complex Kanji characters in Japanese readers’, Psychological Research 55: 52–63.Find this resource:

Foley, W. A. (1991). The Yimas Language of New Guinea. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Foreman, V. (1974). Grammar of Yessan-Mayo. Santa Ana: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Forster, K. I. and J. Hector (2002). ‘Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: The turple eVect’, Memory & Cognition 30: 1106–16.Find this resource:

Fortescue, M. (2004). ‘West Greenlandic (Eskimo)’, in G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, and S. Skopeteas (eds.) Morphologie /Morphology, vol. 2. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter, 1389–99.Find this resource:

Fradin, B. (2003a). Nouvelles approches en morphologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Find this resource:

—— (2003b). ‘Le traitement de la suffixation en -ET’, Langage 152: 51–77.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘On a semantically grounded difference between derivation and compounding’, in W. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. E. Pfeiffer, and F. Rainer (eds.) Morphology and its Demarcations. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 161–82.Find this resource:

Fromkin, V. R. Rodman, P. Collins, and D. Blair (1996). An Introduction to Language, 3rd edn. Sydney: Harcourt Brace.Find this resource:

Frost, R., J. Grainger, and K. Rastle (2005a). ‘Current issues in morphological processing: An introduction’, Language & Cognitive Processes 20: 1–5.Find this resource:

—— T. Kugler, A. Deutsch, and K. I. Forster (2005b). ‘Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 31: 1293–326.Find this resource:

Fuhrhop, N. (1998). Grenzfälle morphologischer Einheiten. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Find this resource:

Fukushima, K. (2005). ‘Lexical V-V compounds in Japanese: Lexicon vs. syntax’, Language 81(3): 568–612.Find this resource:

Furdík, J. (1993). Slovotvorná motivácia a jej jazykové funkcie. Levoča: Modrý Peter.Find this resource:

Gagné, C. L. (2001). ‘Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1: 236–54.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘Lexical and relational influences on the processing of novel compounds’, Brain and Language 81: 723–35.Find this resource:

—— and E. J. Shoben (1997). ‘Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1: 71–87.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘Priming relations in ambiguous noun-noun compounds’, Memory and Cognition 30(4): 637–46.Find this resource:

—— and T. L. Spalding (2004). ‘Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun-noun compounds’, Brain and Language 90: 478–86.Find this resource:

—— (2006a). ‘Relation availability was not confounded with familiarity or plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005)’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 32: 1431–42.Find this resource:

—— (2006b). ‘Using conceptual combination research to better understand novel compound words’, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 3(2): 9–16.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Representing competition among relations during conceptual combination.’ Poster presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Long Beach, CA.Find this resource:

(p. 638) —— (n.d.). ‘Representing competition among relations: An explanation of the CARIN theory of conceptual combination.’Find this resource:

—— and M. C. Gorrie (2005). ‘Sentential context and the interpretation of familiar open-compounds and novel modifier-noun phrases’, Language and Speech 48: 203–21.Find this resource:

Gallmann, P. (1999). ‘Fugenmorpheme als Nicht-Kasus-Suffixe’, Germanistische Linguistik 141(2): 177–90.Find this resource:

Gamkrelidze, T. V. and V. V. Ivanov (1995). Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-language and a Proto-culture. 2 vols. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 80. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Gardner, M. K., E. Z. Rothkopf, R. Lapan, and T. Lafferty (1987). ‘The word frequency effect in lexical decision: Finding a frequency-based component’, Memory & Cognition 15: 24–8.Find this resource:

Geeraerts, D. (2002). ‘The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions’, in R. Dirven and R. Poings (eds.) Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 435–65.Find this resource:

—— and H. Cuyckens (2007). ‘Introducing Cognitive Linguistics’, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–21.Find this resource:

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). ‘Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy’, Journal of Experimental Psychology General 113: 256–81.Find this resource:

Gerrig, R. J. (1989). ‘The time-course of sense creation’, Memory and Cognition 17: 194–207.Find this resource:

Gesenius, W. (1910). Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, ed. E. Kautsch, rev. A. E. Cowley. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Ghomeshi, J., R. Jackendoff, N. Rosen, and K. Russell (2004). ‘Contrastive focus reduplication in English (the salad-salad paper)’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 307–57.Find this resource:

Gianollo, C., C. Guardiano, and G. Longobardi (2008). ‘Three fundamental issues in parametric linguistics’, in T. Biberauer (ed.) The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 109–43.Find this resource:

Giegerich, H. J. (1999). Lexical Strata in English: Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Synonymy blocking and the Elsewhere Condition: Lexical Morphology and the speaker’, Transactions of the Philological Society 99: 65–98.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion’, English Language and Linguistics 8: 1–24.Find this resource:

—— (2005a). ‘Associative adjectives in English and the lexicon—syntax interface’, Journal of Linguistics 41: 571–91.Find this resource:

—— (2005b). ‘Lexicalism and modular overlap in English’, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(2): 43–62.Find this resource:

Gilij, F. S. (1780). Saggio di storia americana; o sia, Storia naturale, civile e sacra deʼ regni, e delle provincie spagnuole di Terra-ferma nellʼAmerica Meridionale, Vol. 1: Della storia geografica, e naturale della provincia dellʼOrinoco. Rome: Luigi Perego.Find this resource:

—— (1781). Saggio di storia americana; o sia, Storia naturale, civile e sacra deʼ regni, e delle provincie spagnuole di Terra-ferma nellʼAmerica Meridionale, Vol. 2: Deʼ costumi degli Orinochesi. Rome: Luigi Perego.Find this resource:

(p. 639) —— (1782). Saggio di storia americana; o sia, Storia naturale, civile e sacra deʼ regni, e delle provincie spagnuole di Terra-ferma nellʼAmerica Meridionale, Vol. 3: Della religione, e delle lingue degli Orinochesi, e di altri Americani. Rome: Luigi Perego.Find this resource:

Giraudo, H. and J. Grainger (2000). ‘Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming’, Language & Cognitive Processes 15: 421–44.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8: 127–31.Find this resource:

Gleason, H. A. (1965). Linguistics and English Grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Find this resource:

Gleitman, L. R. and H. Gleitman (1970). Phrase and Paraphrase: Some Innovative Uses of Language. New York: Norton.Find this resource:

Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The Resilience of Language. New York: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

Golluscio, L. (1997). ‘Notas sobre la incorporatión nominal en mapudungun’, in Actas III Jornadas de Lingüística Aborigen III: 155–67.Find this resource:

González Ñáńez, O. (ed.) (1996). Léxico baniva. Caracas: UNICEF Venezuela.Find this resource:

Gordon, P. (1985). ‘Level-ordering in lexical development’, Cognition 21: 73–93.Find this resource:

Gorog, R. de (1981). ‘The application of onomasiology to synonymy, word formation and etymology’, Word 32: 99–108.Find this resource:

Grace, G. W. (1981). Essay on Language. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.Find this resource:

Granville Hatcher, A. (1960). ‘An introduction to the analysis of English noun compounds’, Word 16: 356–73.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Find this resource:

Grinevald, C. (2000). ‘A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers’, in G. Senft (ed.) Systems of Nominal Classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 50–92.Find this resource:

Gross, G. (1996). Les expressions figées en français. Gap: Ophrys.Find this resource:

Grynberg, H. (2000). Memorbuch. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo W.A.B.Find this resource:

Grzega, J. (2002a). ‘Some thoughts on a cognitive onomasiological approach to word-formation with special reference to English’, Onomasiology Online 3/4.Find this resource:

—— (2002b). ‘Some aspects of modern diachronic onomasiology’, Linguistics 40: 1021–45.Find this resource:

—— (2004). Bezeichnungswandel: Wie, Warum, Wozu? Ein Beitrag zur englischen und allgemeinen Onomasiologie. Heidelberg: Winter.Find this resource:

—— and M. Schöner (2007). English and General Historical Lexicology: Materials for Onomasiology Seminars. Eichstätt: Katholische Universität.Find this resource:

Grzegorczykowa, R. (1979). Zarys słowotwórstwa polskiego: Słowotwórstwo opisowe. Warsaw: PWN.Find this resource:

—— and J. Puzynina (1999). ‘Rzeczownik’, in R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski, and H. Wróbel (eds.) Gramatyka współczesnego jȩzyka polskiego. Morfologia. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 389–468.Find this resource:

Guevara, E. and S. Scalise (2004). ‘V-Compounding in Dutch and Italian’, Cuadernos de Lingüística del Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset XI: 1–29.Find this resource:

Gumnior, H., J. Bolte, and P. Zwitserlood (2006). ‘A chatterbox is a box: Morphology in German word production’, Language & Cognitive Processes 21: 920–44.Find this resource:

Günther, H. (1981). ‘N + N: Untersuchungen zur Produktivität eines deutschen Wortbildungstyps’, in L. Lipka and H. Günther (eds.) Wortbildung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 258–80.Find this resource:

(p. 640) Haas, W. de and M. Trommelen (1993). Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. The Hague: SDU Uitgeverij.Find this resource:

Hacken, P. ten (2007). Chomskyan Linguistics and its Competitors. London: Equinox.Find this resource:

Hale, K. L. (1973). ‘Person marking in Walbiri’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 308–344Find this resource:

—— (1981). ‘Preliminary remarks on the grammar of part-whole relations in Warlpiri’, in J. Hollyman and A. Pawley (eds.) Studies in Pacific Languages and Cultures: In Honour of Bruce Biggs. Auckland: Linguistics Society of New Zealand, 333–44.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Navajo verb structure and noun incorporation’, in A. Carnie, H. Harley, and M. Willie (eds.) Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar: Papers in Honor of Eloise Jelinek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–43.Find this resource:

—— and S. J. Johnson (1967). ‘Lessons in Walbiri I–VII’. Mimeo. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

—— and S. J. Keyser (1993). ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations’, in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 51–109.Find this resource:

—— (2002). Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Halle, M. (1973). ‘Prolegomena to a theory of word formation’, Linguistic Inquiry 4: 3–16.Find this resource:

—— and A. Marantz (1993). ‘Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection’, in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–76.Find this resource:

—— and K. P. Mohanan (1985). ‘Segmental phonology of Modern English’, Linguistic Inquiry 16: 57–116.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. (1983). ‘A composite prototype model of conceptual conjunction.’ Manuscript. The City University London.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions’, Memory & Cognition 15: 55–71.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘Overextension of conjunctive concepts: Evidence for a unitary model of concept typicality and class inclusion’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 12–32.Find this resource:

Hankamer, J. and I. Sag (1976). ‘Deep and surface anaphora’, Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.Find this resource:

Hansen, A. (1967). Moderne Dansk. 3 vols. Copenhagen: Grafisk.Find this resource:

Hansen, B., K. Hansen, A. Neubert, and M. Schentke (1982). Englische Lexikologie: Einführung in Wortbildung und lexikalische Semantik. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.Find this resource:

Hargus, S. (2007). Witsuwitʼen Grammar. Phonetics, Phonology, Morphology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Find this resource:

Harley, H. (2004). ‘Merge, conflation and head movement: The First Sister Principle revisited’, in K. Moulton (ed.) Proceedings of NELS 34. U. Mass Amherst: GSLA, 239–54.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Bare Phrase Structure, acategorial roots, one-replacement and unaccusativity’, in S. Gorbachovand A. Nevins (eds.) Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 11. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Linguistics Department.Find this resource:

—— and R. Noyer (1999). ‘Distributed Morphology’, GLOT International 4(4): 3–9.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon’, in B. Peeters (ed.) The Lexicon/Encyclopaedia Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press, 349–74.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.Find this resource:

Hathout, N., M. Plénat, and L. Tanguy (2003). ‘Enquête sur les dérivés en -able’, Cahiers de Grammaire: 49–90.Find this resource:

(p. 641) Hauser, M. D., D. Barner, and T. O'Donnell (2007). ‘Evolutionary Linguistics: A new look at an old landscape’, Language Learning and Development 3(2): 101–132.Find this resource:

—— N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch (2002). ‘The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’ Science 298: 1569–79.Find this resource:

Havránek, B. and A. Jedlička (1981). Česká mluvnice. Prague: SPN.Find this resource:

Hazout, I. (1991). ‘Action nominalizations and the Lexicalist Hypothesis.’ PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Heath, J. (2005). A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Heim, I. and A. Kratzer (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell, Malden.Find this resource:

Henderson, L. (1985). ‘Toward a psychology of morphemes’, in A. W. Ellis (ed.) Progress in the Psychology of Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 15–72.Find this resource:

Hercus, L. A., F. Hodges, and J. Simpson (2002). The Land is a Map: Placenames of Indigenous Origin in Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics and Pandanus Press.Find this resource:

Heringer, H. J. (1984). ‘Wortbildung: Sinn aus dem Chaos’, Deutsche Sprache 12: 1–13.Find this resource:

Hervás y Panduro, L. (1786). Idea dellʼUniverso, Vol. 19: Aritmetica delle nazioni e divisione del tempo fra l'Orientali. Cesena: Gregorio Biasini.Find this resource:

Hetzron, R. (ed.) (1997). The Semitic Languages. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Heyvaert, L. (2003). A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, J. (1985), ‘On semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–94.Find this resource:

Hill, A. A. (1962). ‘Review of The Grammar of English Nominalizations by Robert B. Lees’, Language 38: 434–44.Find this resource:

Hippisley, A. (2001). ‘Word formation rules in a default inheritance framework: A Network Morphology account of Russian personal names’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1999. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 221–62.Find this resource:

Hiramatsu, K., W. Snyder, T. Roeper, S. Storrs, and M. Saccoman (2000). ‘Of musical hand chairs and linguistic swing’, in S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, and T. Keith-Lucas (eds.) Proceedings of the 24th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 409–17.Find this resource:

Hirt, H. (1932). Handbuch des Urgermanischen, vol. 2: Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre. Heidelberg: Winter.Find this resource:

Hoeksema, J. (1984). ‘Categorial Morphology.’ PhD Dissertation. RU Groningen.Find this resource:

—— (1985). Categorial Morphology. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘Head-types in morpho-syntax’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1: 123–38.Find this resource:

Hoekstra, E. (1996). ‘lets over de eerste leden van samenstellingen’, Leuvense Bijdragen 84: 491–504.Find this resource:

Hoekstra, J. (2002). ‘Genitive compounds in Frisian as lexical phrases’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 227–59.Find this resource:

Hohenhaus, P. (1998). ‘Non-lexicalizability as a characteristic feature of nonce word-formation in English and German’, Lexicology 4, 2: 237–80.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Identical constituent compounds—a corpus-based study’, Folia Linguistica 38, 3–4: 297–331.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Lexicalization and institutionalization’, in P. Štekauer and R. Lieber (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 353–74.Find this resource:

(p. 642) Holmberg, A. (2001). ‘Expletives and agreement in Scandinavian passives’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Syntax 4: 85–128.Find this resource:

Holt, D. (1999). Tol (Jicaque). Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Holton, D., P. Mackridge, and I. Philippaki-Warburton (1997). Greek Grammar. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Horecký, J. (1983). Vývin a teória jazyka. Bratislava: SPN.Find this resource:

—— (1994). Semantics of Derived Words. Prešov: Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Šafarikanae.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Onomasiologická interpetácia tvorenia slov’, Slovo a slovesnost 60: 6–12.Find this resource:

Hornos, J. E. M. and Y. M. M. Hornos (1993). ‘Algebraic model for the evolution of the genetic code’, Physical Review Letters 71(26): 4401–4.Find this resource:

Hornstein, N. and D. Lightfoot (1981). ‘Introduction’, in N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (eds.) Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. London: Longman, 9–31.Find this resource:

Householder, F. (1962). ‘Review of Robert B. Lees’, The Grammar of Nominalizations', Word 18: 326–53.Find this resource:

Hovdhaugen, E. (2004). Mochica. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Huang, H.-C. (2006). ‘Argument realization of Chinese result and phase complements’, UTA Working Papers in Linguistics 2006–2007, 66–89.Find this resource:

Huang, J. C.-T. (1982). ‘Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar.’ PhD dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

—— (1984). ‘Phrase Structure, Lexical Integrity, and Chinese compounds’, Journal of Chinese Teachers' Association 19(2): 53–78.Find this resource:

—— (1992). ‘Complex predicates’, in R. Larson, S. Iatroudou, U. Lahiri, and J. Higginbotham (eds.) Control and Grammar. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 109–47.Find this resource:

Huang, S. (1998). ‘Chinese as a headless language’, in J. Packard (ed.) Compounding Morphology: New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 261–83.Find this resource:

Hudson, R. (1975). ‘Problems in the analysis of -ed adjectives’, Journal of Linguistics 11: 69–72.Find this resource:

uke, I. (1977). Die Wortbildungstheorie von Miloš Dokulil. Giessen.Find this resource:

Hulst, H. van der, and N. A. Ritter (2003). ‘Levels, constraints, and heads’, in A. M. DiSciullo (ed.) Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. 2: Morphology, Phonology and Acquisition. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 147–88.Find this resource:

Hume, R. (2002). RSPB Complete Birds of Britain and Europe. London: Dorling Kindersley.Find this resource:

Inhoff, A., D. Briihl, and J. Schwartz (1996). ‘Compound word effects differ in reading, online naming, and delayed naming tasks’, Memory & Cognition 24: 466–76.Find this resource:

—— R. Radach, and D. Heller (2000). ‘Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning’, Journal of Memory and Language 42(1): 23–50.Find this resource:

Jaarsveld, H. J. van and G. E. Rattink (1988). ‘Frequency effects in the processing of lexicalized and novel nominal compounds’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 17: 447–73.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. S. (1975). ‘Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon’, Language 51: 639–71.Find this resource:

—— (1977). X-Bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

(p. 643) —— (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (2002a). Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2002b). ‘English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax’, in N. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, A. Macintyre, and S. Urban (eds.) Verb Particle Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 67–94.Find this resource:

—— (2007). Language, Consciousness, Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jacobi, H. G. (1897). Compositum und Nebensatz: Studien über die indogermanische Sprachentwicklung. Bonn: Cohen.Find this resource:

Jacobs, R. A. and P. S. Rosenbaum (1968). English Transformational Grammar. London: Ginn.Find this resource:

jadacka, H. (2001). System słowotwórczy polszczyzny. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Find this resource:

—— (2006). Kultura jȩzyka polskiego. Fleksja, słowotwórstwo, składnia. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Find this resource:

Jarema, G., C. Busson, R. Nikolova, K. Tsapkini, and G. Libben (1999). ‘Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study’, Brain and Language 68(1–2): 362–9.Find this resource:

Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Jespersen, O. (1942). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, vol. 6. London: Allen & Unwin.Find this resource:

Jisa, H., J. S. Reilly, L. Verhoeven, E. Baruch, and E. Rosado (2002). ‘Passive voice constructions in written texts: A crosslinguistic developmental study’, Written Language and Literacy 5: 163–82.Find this resource:

Johnson, K. (2002). ‘Towards an etiology of adjunct islands.’ Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available online at http://people.umass.edu/kbj/homepage/Content/Etiology.pdf.Find this resource:

Jones, D. (1969). An Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons Ltd.Find this resource:

Juhasz, B. J., A. W. Inhoff, and K. Rayner (2005). ‘The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words’, Language & Cognitive Processes 20: 291–316.Find this resource:

—— M. S. Starr, A. W. Lnhoff, and L. Placke (2003). ‘The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations’, British Journal of Psychology 94: 223–44.Find this resource:

Kageyama, T. (1982). ‘Word Formation in Japanese’, Lingua 57: 215–58.Find this resource:

—— (1989). ‘The place of morphology in the grammar’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1989. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 73–94.Find this resource:

—— (1993). Bunpoo to Gokeisei. [Grammar and Word Formation.] Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Word formation’, in N. Tsujimura (ed.) The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 297–325.Find this resource:

—— (2001a). ‘Word Plus’, in J. van der Weijer and T. Nishihara (eds.) Issues in Japanese Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 245–76.Find this resource:

—— (2001b). ‘Polymorphism and boundedness in event/entity nominalizations’, Journal of Japanese Linguistics 17: 29–57.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Agent incorporation and other peculiar morphological operations inducing individual-level predications.’ Paper delivered at 6th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, University of Patras, Greece.Find this resource:

Kallas, K. (1999). ‘Przymiotnik’, in R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski, and H. Wróbel (eds.) Gramatyka współczesnego jȩzyka polskiego: Morfologia. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 469–523.Find this resource:

(p. 644) Karlsson, F. (1999). Finnish: An Essential Grammar. London and New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Kärre, K. (1915). Nomina agentis in Old English. I. Uppsala: Akademiska Bokhandeln.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1974). ‘Introduction,’ in D. Kastovsky (ed.) Studies in Syntax and Word-Formation: Selected Articles by Hans Marchand. Munich: Fink, 10–22.Find this resource:

—— (1980). ‘Zero in morphology: A means of making up for phonological losses?’ in J. Fisiak (ed.) Historical Morphology. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 17. The Hague: Mouton, 213–50.Find this resource:

—— (1981). ‘Interaction of lexicon and syntax: Lexical converses. Forms and functions’, in J. Esser and A. Hübler (eds.) Papers in General, English and Applied Linguistics Presented to Vilém Fried on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. Tübingen: Narr, 123–36.Find this resource:

—— (1982). ‘Word-formation: A functional view’, Folia Linguistica 16: 181–98.Find this resource:

—— (1992a). ‘Semantics and vocabulary’, in R. M. Hogg (ed.) The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 1: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 290–407.Find this resource:

—— (1992b). ‘Typological reorientation as a result of level interaction: The case of English morphology’, in G. Kellermann and M. D. Morrissey (eds.) Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition. Duisburger Arbeiten zur Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft 14. Frankfurt-am-Main: Lang, 411–28.Find this resource:

—— (1996a). ‘Verbal derivation in English: A historical survey. Or: Much Ado about Nothing’, in D. Britton (ed.) English Historical Linguistics 1994. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 135. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 93–117.Find this resource:

—— (1996b). ‘The place of word-formation in grammar: A historical survey’, in K. R. Jankowsky (ed.) Multiple Perspectives on the Historical Dimensions of Language. Münster: Nodus, 227–43.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Words and word-formation: Morphology in the OED’, in L. Muggleston (ed.) Lexicography and the OED: Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 110–25.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘The “haves” and the “have-nots” in Germanic and English: From Bahuvrihi compounds to affixal derivation’, in K. Lenz and R. Möhlig (eds.) Of Dyuersitie and Chaunge of Language: Essays Presented to Manfred Görlach on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. Heidelberg: Winter, 33–46.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Hans Marchand and the Marchandeans’, in P. Štekauer and R. Lieber (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 99–124.Find this resource:

—— (2006a). ‘Historical morphology from a typological point of view: Examples from English’, in T. Nevalainen, J. Klemola, and M. Laitinen (eds.) Types of Variation: Diachronic, Dialectal and Typological Interfaces. SLCS 76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 53–80.Find this resource:

—— (2006b). ‘Vocabulary’, in R. M. Hogg and D. Denison (eds.) A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199–270.Find this resource:

Katamba, F. (1994). English Words. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Kavka, S. (2003). A Book on Idiomatology. Žilina: EDIS.Find this resource:

Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (2000). Parameters and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2001). Prepositions as Probes. Ms., New York University.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Prepositions as probes,’ in A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 192–212.Find this resource:

Ke, Z. (2003). ‘Verb-noun compounds in Chinese’, Southwest Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 109–29.Find this resource:

(p. 645) Keller, R. E. (1978). The German Language. London / Boston: Faber and Faber.Find this resource:

Kemenade, A. van and B. L. Los (2003). ‘Particles and prefixes in Dutch and English’, Yearbook of Morphology 2003. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 79–117.Find this resource:

Kemmer, S. and M. Barlow (1999). ‘Introduction: A usage-based conception of language’, in M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds.) Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, vii–xxviii.Find this resource:

Kenesei, I. (2000). ‘Szavak, szófajok, toldalékok’, in F. Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális magyar nyelvtan, 3: Morfológia. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 75–136.Find this resource:

Kern, S. (1996). ‘Comment les enfants jonglent avec les contraintes communicationnelles, discursives et linguistiques dans la production dʼune narrative.’ PhD Dissertation. Université Lumière, Lyon 2.Find this resource:

Kiefer, F. (1990). ‘Noun incorporation in Hungarian’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 40(1–2): 149–77.Find this resource:

—— (1992a). ‘Compounding in Hungarian’, Rivista di Linguistica 4: 61–78.Find this resource:

—— (1992b). ‘Compounds and argument structure in Hungarian’, in I. Kenesei and C. Pléh (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian, Vol. 4: The Structure of Hungarian. Szeged: The University of Szeged, 51–66.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Az összetételek’ [Compounds], in F. Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális magyar nyelvtan, 3: Morfológia. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 519–67.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Productivity and compounding’, in C. Schaner-Wolles, J. Rennison, and F. Neubarth (eds.) Naturally! Linguistic Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier, 225–31.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘Alaktan’ [Morphology], in É. K. Kiss, F. Kiefer, and P. Siptár (eds.) Új magyar nyelvtan. Budapest: Osiris, 189–284.Find this resource:

Kilani-Schoch, M. and W. U. Dressler (1992). ‘Prol-o, intell-o, gauch-o et les autres. Propriétés formelles de deux opérations du français parlé’, Romanisches Jahrbuch: 65–86.Find this resource:

Kingdon, R. (1958). The Groundwork of English Stress. London: Longman.Find this resource:

—— (1966). The Groundwork of English Intonation. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. (1973). ‘“Elsewhere” in phonology’, in S. A. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 93–106.Find this resource:

—— (1982). ‘Lexical Phonology and Morphology’, in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981. Seoul: Hanshin, 3–91.Find this resource:

—— (1985). ‘Some consequences of lexical phonology’, Phonology Yearbook 2: 85–138.Find this resource:

Klein, W. and C. Perdue (1997). ‘The Basic Variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?)’, Second Language Research 13: 301–47.Find this resource:

Klinge, A. (2005). ‘The Structure of English Nominals.’ Doctor linguae mercantilis thesis. Copenhagen Business School.Find this resource:

Koch, P. (2001). ‘Bedeutungswandel und Bezeichnungswandel: Von der kognitiven Semasiologie zur kognitiven Onomasiologie’, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 121: 7–36.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘Lexical typology from a cognitive and linguistic point of view’, in D. A. Cruse et al. (eds.) Lexicology: An International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies / Lexikologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen, vol. 1. Berlin / New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1142–78.Find this resource:

Koenig, J-P. (1999). Lexical Relations. Stanford: CSLI.Find this resource:

Koester, D., T. C. Gunter, and S. Wagner (2007). ‘The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs’, Brain and Language 203: 64–79.Find this resource:

(p. 646) Kolb, B. and I. Q. Wishaw (1990). Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology. New York: Freeman.Find this resource:

Kornfeld, L. (2005). ‘Formación de palabras en la sintaxis desde la perspectiva de la Morfología Distribuida.’ PhD dissertation, Universidad de Buenos Aires.Find this resource:

—— and A. Saab (2003). ‘Morphology and syntax: The case of prepositional prefixes in Spanish’, in G. Booij, J. DeCesaris, A. Ralli, and S. Scalise (eds.) Topics in Morphology: Selected Papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (Barcelona, September 20–22, 2001). Barcelona: IULA, 227–40.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Hacia una tipología de las anáforas nominales en español.’ paper presented at III Encuentro de Gramática Generativa, Universidad Nacional del Comahue (Neuquén), 18–20 August 2005.Find this resource:

Körtvélyessy, L. (2008). ‘Vplyv sociolingvistických faktorov na produktivitu v slovotvorbe.’ PhD dissertation, Presov.Find this resource:

Koziol, H. (1937). Handbuch der englischen Wortbildungslehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter's Universitätsbuchhandlung.Find this resource:

Krahe, H. and W. Meid (1967). Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. III. Wortbildungslehre. Göschen 1218. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Krauss, M. and J. Leer (1981). Athabaskan, Eyak, and Tlingit Sonorants. Alaska Native Language Center Research Papers (No. 5). Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Alaska Native Language Center.Find this resource:

Krieger, H.-U. and J. Nerbonne (1993). ‘Feature-based inheritance networks for computational lexicons’, in T. Briscoe, A. Copestake, and V. de Paiva (eds.) Inheritance, Defaults and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90–136.Find this resource:

Krott, A. (2001). ‘Analogy in morphology. The selection of linking elements in Dutch compounds.’ PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Find this resource:

—— H. R. Baayen, and R. Schreuder (2001). ‘Analogy in morphology: Modelling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch’, Linguistics 39: 51–93.Find this resource:

—— and E. Nicoladis (2005). ‘Large constituent families help children parse compounds’, Journal of Child Language 32: 139–58.Find this resource:

—— R. Schreuder, H. R. Baayen, and W. U. Dressler (2007) ‘Analogical effects on linking elements in German compounds’, Language and Cognitive Processes 22: 25–57.Find this resource:

Kuiper, K. (1999). ‘Compounding by adjunction and its empirical consequences’, Language Sciences 21: 407–22.Find this resource:

Kurschner, W. (1974). Zur syntaktischen Beschreibung deutscher Nominalkomposita auf der Grundlage generativer Transformationsgrammatiken. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

—— (1977). ‘Generative Transformationsgrammatik und die Wortbildungstheorie von Hans Marchand’, in H. Brekle and D. Kastovsky (eds.) Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung. Wuppertaler Schriftenseihe Linguistics 1. Bonn: Bouvier, 129–139.Find this resource:

Kuryłowicz, J. (1964). The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Find this resource:

—— (1968). Indogermanische Grammatik, vol. 2: Akzent, Ablaut. Heidelberg: Winter.Find this resource:

Kurzowa, Z. (1976). Złożenia imienne we współczesnym jȩzyku polskim. Warsaw: Państ-wowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Find this resource:

Labov, W. (1973). ‘The boundaries of words and their meaning’, in C.-J. N. Bailey and R. W. Shuy (eds.) New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Washington, D C: Georgetown University Press, 340–73.Find this resource:

(p. 647) Laczkó, T. (2000). ‘Az argumentumszerkezetet megőrző főnévképzés’ [Deverbal nouns preserving the argument structure of the base], in F. Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális magyar nyelvtan, 3: Morfológia. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 293–407.Find this resource:

Ladd, R. D. (1984). ‘English Compound Stress’, in D. Gibbon and H. Richter (eds.) Intonation, Accent and Rhythm: Studies in Discourse Phonology. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 253–66.Find this resource:

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘A usage-based model’, in B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.) Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 127–61.Find this resource:

—— (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1998a). ‘Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar’, in M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Mahwah, NJ / London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1–39.Find this resource:

—— (1998b). ‘Linguistic evidence and mental representations’, Cognitive Linguistics 9: 151–73.Find this resource:

—— (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Langeweg, S. J. (1988). ‘The Stress System of Dutch.’ PhD Dissertation, University of Leiden.Find this resource:

Lapointe, S. (1980). ‘The Theory of Grammatical Agreement.’ PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Lardiere, D. (1995a). ‘L2 acquisition of English synthetic compounding is not constrained by level-ordering (and neither, probably, is L1)’, Second Language Research 11: 20–56.Find this resource:

—— (1995b). ‘Differential treatment of regular versus irregular inflection in compounds as nonevidence for level-ordering’, Second Language Research 11: 267–9.Find this resource:

Larson, R. and H. Yamakido (2006). ‘Zazaki “double ezafe” as double case-marking.’ Paper presented at the Linguistics Society of America annual meeting, Albuquerque, NM, 8 January 2006. Available online at http://semlab5.sbs.sunysb.edu/%7Erlarson/larson-papers.html.Find this resource:

Laughren, M. (2007). ‘Deriving new verbs in Warlpiri.’ Australian Linguistics Society Annual Conference, Adelaide.Find this resource:

—— (in prep.). Warlpiri Dictionary. Brisbane: University of Queensland.Find this resource:

Launey, M. (2004). ‘Nahuatl (Uto-Aztecan)’, in G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, and S. Skopeteas (eds.) Morphologie/Morphology, vol 2. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter, 1433–53.Find this resource:

Leech, G. (1974). Semantics. Penguin Books.Find this resource:

Lees, R. B. (1960). The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press/The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— (1966). ‘On a transformational analysis of compounds: A reply to Hans Marchand’, Indogermanische Forschungen 71: 1–13.Find this resource:

—— (1970). ‘Problems in the grammatical analysis of English nominal compounds’, in M. Bierwisch and K. E. Heidolph (eds.) Progress in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 174–86.Find this resource:

Lefebvre, C. and A.-M. Brousseau (2002). A Grammar of Fongbe. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

(p. 648) Legate, J. A. (2002). ‘Warlpiri: Theoretical Implications.’ PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Some interface properties of the phase’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 506–16.Find this resource:

Leitzke, E. (1989). (De)nominale Adjektive im heutigen Englisch: Untersuchungen zur Morphologie, Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik von Adjektiv-Nomen-Kombinationen vom Typ atomic energy und criminal lawyer. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Find this resource:

Leser, M. (1990). Das Problem der ‘Zusammenbildungen’. Trier: WVT.Find this resource:

Levi, J. N. (1976). ‘A semantic analysis of Hebrew compound nominals’, in P. Cole (ed.) Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 9–56.Find this resource:

—— (1978). The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—— (1983). ‘Complex nominals: New discoveries, new questions’, in S. Hattori and K. Inoue (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists = Actes du XIIIe congrès international des linguistes, 29 August-4 September 1982. Tokyo: Proceedings Publishing Committee, 183–97.Find this resource:

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav (1999). ‘Two structures for compositionally derived events’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9. Ithaca: CLC Publications, 199–223.Find this resource:

Li, C. N. and S. A. Thompson (1978). ‘An exploration of Mandarin Chinese’, in W. P. Lehmann (ed.) Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language. Austin: University of Texas Press: 233–66.Find this resource:

—— (1981). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Li, Y. (1990). ‘On V-V compounds in Chinese’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 177–207.Find this resource:

—— (1993). ‘Structural head and aspectuality’, Language 69(3): 480–504.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘The thematic hierarchy and causativity’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 255–82.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ˚Theory of the Morphology—Syntax Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Libben, G. (1998). ‘Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment’, Brain and Language 61(1): 30–44.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Everything is psycholinguistics: Material and methodological considerations in the study of compound processing’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 50: 267–83.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues’, in G. Libben and G. Jarema (eds.) The Representation and Processing of Compound Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–22.Find this resource:

—— B. L. Derwing, and R. G. Almeida (1999). ‘Ambiguous novel compounds and models of morphological parsing’, Brain and Language 68: 378–86.Find this resource:

—— M. Gibson, Y. B. Yoon, and D. Sandra (2003). ‘Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness’, Brain and Language 84: 50–64.Find this resource:

—— and G. Jarema (2006). The Representation and Processing of Compounds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Liberman, M. and A. Prince (1977). ‘On stress and linguistic rhythm’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249–336.Find this resource:

—— and R. Sproat (1992). ‘The stress and structure of modified noun phrases in English’, in I. A. Sag and A. Scabolcsi (eds.) Lexical Matters. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 131–81.Find this resource:

Lieber, R. (1981). On the Organization of the Lexicon. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics ClubFind this resource:

. Reprinted

(1990) New York: Garland.Find this resource:

(p. 649) —— (1983). ‘Argument linking and compounds in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 14: 251–85.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘Phrasal compounds in English and the morphology—syntax interface’, in D. Brentari, G. Larson, and L. MacLeod (eds.) CLS-24-II, Papers from the Parasession on Agreement in Grammatical Theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 202–22.Find this resource:

—— (1992a). Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— (1992b). ‘Compounding in English’, Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 79–96.Find this resource:

—— (2004). Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘English word-formation processes’, in P. Štekauer and R. Lieber (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 375–428.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘The category of roots and the roots of categories: What we learn from selection in derivation’, Morphology 16(2): 247–72.Find this resource:

—— and H. Baayen (1997). ‘A semantic principle of auxiliary selection in Dutch’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15(4): 789–845.Find this resource:

—— and S. Scalise (2006). ‘The Lexical Integrity Hypothesis in a new theoretical universe’, Lingue e Linguaggio 5(1): 7–32.Find this resource:

Lima, S. and A. Pollatsek (1983). ‘Lexical access via an orthographic code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) reconsidered’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22(3): 310–32.Find this resource:

Lin, F.-W. (1990). ‘The verb-complement (V-R) compounds in Mandarin’. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.Find this resource:

Lin, H.-L. (1996). ‘A lexical syntactic analysis of resultative compounds in Mandarin Chinese’, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 26(1–2): 193–204.Find this resource:

Ling, Y. (2000). References Xiandai Hangyu Suolüeyu [Abbreviations in Contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: Yuwen chubanshe.Find this resource:

Lint, T. van (1982). ‘The interpretation of compound nouns’, in S. Daalder and M. Gerritsen (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1982. Amsterdam / Oxford: North-Holland, 135–45.Find this resource:

Lipka, L. (2005). ‘Lexicalization and institutionalization: Revisited and extended’, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(2): 40–2.Find this resource:

Ljung, M. (1976). ‘-ed adjectives revisited’, Journal of Linguistics 12(1): 159–68.Find this resource:

Lojenga, C. K. (1994). Ngiti. Cologne: Köppe.Find this resource:

Loncon Antileo, E. (2005). ‘Morfológía y aspectos del Mapudungun.’ PhD dissertation, Universidad Autcónoma Metropolitana.Find this resource:

Longobardi, G. (2003). ‘La linguistica parametrica: un nuovo programma di ricerca tra presente futuro delle scienze del linguaggio’, Lingue e Linguaggio 1: 3–30.Find this resource:

Lu, Z. (1964). References Hanyu de goucifa [Chinese Morphology]. Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe.Find this resource:

Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual Choice Behaviour. New York: Wiley.Find this resource:

Lüdeling, A. (2001). On Particle Verbs and Similar Constructions in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Lukatela, G., B. Gligorijevic, A. Kostic, and M. T. Turvey (1980). ‘Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon’, Memory & Cognition 8: 415–23.Find this resource:

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1983). Language, Meaning and Context. London: Fontana Paperbacks.Find this resource:

MacWhinney, B. (2004). ‘A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition’, Journal of Child Language 31: 883–914.Find this resource:

Maiden, M. and C. Robustelli (2000). A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian. London: Arnold.Find this resource:

(p. 650) Malikouti-Drachman, A. (1997). ‘Prosodic domains in Greek compounding’, in G. Drachman et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Greek Linguistics. Graz: Neugebauer Verlag, 87–96.Find this resource:

Manelis, L. and D. A. Tharp (1977). ‘The processing of affixed words’, Memory & Cognition 5: 690–5.Find this resource:

Mangold-Allwinn, R. et al. (1995). Wörter für Dinge: Von flexiblen Konzepten zu Benennungen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Find this resource:

Marantz, A. (1996). ‘Cat as a phrasal idiom.’ Ms. MIT.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon’, in A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark, and A. Williams (eds.) Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium. Philadelphia: UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, 201–25.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Roots: The universality of root and pattern morphology.’ Paper presented at the Conference on Afro-Asiatic Languages, University of Paris VII.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Words.’ Paper presented at the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, University of Southern California Los Angeles, 24 February 2001. Available online at http://web.mit.edu/marantz/Public/EALING/WordsWCCFL.pdf.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Pulling words up by the Root.’ Handout of talk presented at McGill University.Find this resource:

Marchand, H. (1960). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

—— (1965a). ‘The analysis of verbal nexus substantives’, Indogermanische Forschungen 70: 57–71Find this resource:

, repr. in

D. Kastovsky (ed.) (1974). H. Marchand: Studies in Syntax and Word-Formation. Munich: Fink, 276–91.Find this resource:

—— (1965b). ‘On the analysis of substantive compounds and suffixal derivatives not containing a verbal element’, Indogermanische Forschungen 70: 117–45Find this resource:

, repr. in

D. Kastovsky (ed.) (1974). H. Marchand: Studies in Syntax and Word-Formation. Munich: Fink, 292–322.Find this resource:

—— (1967). ‘Expansion, transposition, and derivation’, La Linguistique 1: 13–26.Find this resource:

—— (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach, 2nd edn. Munich: Beck.Find this resource:

Markman, E. M., J. L. Wasow, and M. B. Hansen (2003). ‘Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners’, Cognitive Psychology 47: 241–75.Find this resource:

Marslen-Wilson, W., L. Komisarjevsky Tyler, R. Waksler, and L. Older (1994). ‘Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon’, Psychological Review 101: 3–33.Find this resource:

Massam, D. (2001). ‘Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19: 153–97.Find this resource:

Masson, M. and C. MacLeod (1992). ‘Re-enacting the route to interpretation: Enhanced perceptual identification without prior perception’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121: 145–76.Find this resource:

Masullo, P. J. (1996). ‘Los sintagmas nominales sin determinante: una propuesta incorporacionista’, in I. Bosque (ed.) El sustantivo sin determinaóidn. Madrid: Visor, 169–200.Find this resource:

Mathieu-Colas, M. (1996). ‘Essai de typologie des noms composés français’, Cahiers de lexicologie: 71–125.Find this resource:

Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Complex Predicates in Japanese. Stanford: CSLI.Find this resource:

Mattens, M. W. H. (1970). De Indifferentialis. Een Onderzoek naar het anumerieke Gebruik van het Substantief in het algemeen bruikbaar Nederlands. Assen: Van Gorcum & Comp.Find this resource:

—— (1984). ‘De voorspelbaarheid van tussenklanken in nominale samenstellingen’, De Nieuwe Taalgids 77: 333–43.Find this resource:

(p. 651) —— (1987). ‘Tussenklanken in substantivische en adjectivische samenstellingen’, Forum der Letteren 28: 108–14.Find this resource:

Matthews, P. H. (1961). ‘Transformational Grammar’, Archivum Linguisticum 13: 196–209.Find this resource:

Matushansky, O. (2003). ‘Going through a phase’, in M. McGinnis and N. Richards (eds.) Perspectives on Phase. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49, 157–81.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Head-movement in linguistic theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 69–109.Find this resource:

McCawley, J. D. (1968). ‘Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure’, in Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting. Chicago Linguistic Society, 71–80.Find this resource:

Repr. in

J. D. McCawley (1976). Grammar and Meaning: Papers on Syntactic and Semantic Topics. New York: Academic Press, 155–66.Find this resource:

—— (1978). ‘Foreword’, in J. Levi (1978) The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press, xi–xiii.Find this resource:

McHombo, S. A. (1998). ‘Chichewa (Bantu)’, in A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.) The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford / Malden, MA: Blackwell, 500–20.Find this resource:

Meibauer, J. (2001). ‘Lexikon und Morphologie’, in J. Meibauer et al. (eds.) Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik. Stuttgart / Weimar: Metzler, 15–69.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Phrasenkomposita zwischen Wortsyntax und Lexikon’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 22: 153–88.Find this resource:

Meier-Brügger, M. (2002). Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Meissner, T. and O. Tribulato (2002). ‘Nominal composition in Mycenaean Greek’, Transactions ofthe Philological Society 100(3): 289–330.Find this resource:

MelʼČuk, I. (1982). Towards a Language of Linguistics. Munich: Fink.Find this resource:

—— (1993) Cours de morphologie générale. Première partie: le mot. Montréal: Presses de lʼUniversité de Montreal - CNRS Editions.Find this resource:

Mellenius, I. (1997). The Acquisition of Nominal Compounding in Swedish. Lund: Lund University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Word formation’, in G. Josefsson, C. Platzack, and G. Håkansson (eds.) The Acquisition of Swedish Grammar. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 75–93.Find this resource:

Melloni, C. and A. Bisetto (2007). ‘Parasynthetic compounding’. Paper delivered at 6th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Ithaca, Greece.Find this resource:

Meyer, R. (1993). Compound Comprehension in Isolation and in Context: The Contribution of Conceptual and Discourse Knowledge to the Comprehension of German Novel Noun-Noun Compounds. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Michaelis, L. A. and K. Lambrecht (1996). ‘Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition’, Language 72: 215–47.Find this resource:

Miller, G. A. and P. N. Johnson-Laird (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Millikan, R. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Minkova, D. (2007). ‘Stress-shifting in English Prefixed Words: Continuity or Re-invention.’ Paper presented at the 5th SHEL Conference, Athens, Georgia, 4–6 October 2007.Find this resource:

Mitchell, T. F. (1975). ‘Linguistic “goings-on”: collocations and other lexical matters arising on the syntagmatic record’, in Principles of Firthian Linguistics. London: Longman, 99–136.Find this resource:

Mithun, M. (1984). ‘The evolution of noun incorporation’, Language 60: 847–94.Find this resource:

—— (1986a). ‘The convergence of noun classification systems’, in C. Craig (ed.) Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 379–97.Find this resource:

(p. 652) —— (1986b). ‘On the nature of noun incorporation’, Language 62: 32–37.Find this resource:

—— (1996). ‘Multiple reflections of inalienability in Mohawk’, in H. Chappell and W. McGregor (eds.) The Grammar of Inalienability. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 633–49.Find this resource:

—— (1999). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2001a). ‘Lexical forces shaping the evolution of grammar’, in L. Brinton (ed.) Historical Linguistics 1999. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 241–52.Find this resource:

—— (2001b). ‘Actualization patterns in grammaticalization: From clause to locative morphology’, in H. Andersen (ed.) Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progess. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 143–68.Find this resource:

—— (2001c). ‘The difference a category makes in the expression of possession and inalienability’, in M. Herslund, F. Sørensen, and I. Baron (eds.) Dimensions of Possession. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 285–310.Find this resource:

Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Find this resource:

Molinsky, S. J. (1973). Patterns of Ellipsis in Russian Compound Noun Formations. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Monsell, S. (1985). ‘Repetition and the Lexicon’, in A. W. Ellis (ed.) Progress in the Psychology of Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 147–95.Find this resource:

Montague, R. (1973).‘The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.) Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 221–42.Find this resource:

Monus, V. and S. Isaiah (n.d.). Slavey Topical Dictionary. Summer Institute of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Moro, A. (2000). Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Mosonyi, E. E. (2002). ‘La fonología suprasegmental y otras particularidades del baniva de Maroa, idioma tonal arawak del Río Negro, Venezuela’, in M. Crevels et al. (eds.) Current Studies on South American Languages. Leiden: University of Leiden, 127–36.Find this resource:

—— and H. Camico (1996). ‘Introductión al análisis del idioma baniva’, in O. González Ñáñez (ed.) Gramática baniva. Caracas: UNICEF Venezuela, 9–41.Find this resource:

—— and J. C. Mosonyi (2000). Manual de lenguas indígenas de Venezuela. Caracas: Fundación Bigott.Find this resource:

Mosonyi, J. C. (1987). ‘El idioma yavitero: ensayo de gramática y diccionario.’ PhD dissertation, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas.Find this resource:

Motsch, W. (1970). ‘Analyse von Komposita mit zwei nominalen Elementen’, in M. Bierwisch and K. E. Heidolph (eds.) Progress in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 208–23.Find this resource:

Mulford, R. (1983). ‘On the acquisition of Derivational Morphology in Icelandic: Learning about -ari’, Islenski Mál og Almenn Málfraeði 5: 105–25.Find this resource:

Munn, A. (1992). ‘Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordination structures.’ PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘The possessor that stayed close to home’, in V. Samiian and J. Schaeffer (eds.) Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 24), 181–95.Find this resource:

Murphy, G. L. (1988). ‘Comprehending complex concepts’, Cognitive Science 12: 529–62.Find this resource:

—— (1990). ‘Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination’, Journal of Memory and Language 29: 259–88.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘Conceptual approaches I: An overview’, in D. A. Cruse, F. Hundsnurscher, M. Job, and P. R. Lutzeier (eds.) Lexicology: An International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies, vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 269–77.Find this resource:

(p. 653) Murphy, V. A. and E. Nicoladis (2006). ‘When answer-phone makes a difference in children's acquisition of English compounds’, Journal of Child Language 33: 677–91.Find this resource:

Murrell, G. A. and J. Morton (1974). ‘Word recognition and morphemic structure’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 102: 963–8.Find this resource:

Nagórko, A. (1998). Zarys gramatyki polskiej (ze słowotwórstwem). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Find this resource:

Nagy, W. E. and R. C. Anderson (1984). ‘How many words are there in printed school English’, Reading Research Quarterly 19: 304–30.Find this resource:

—— M. Schommer, J. A. Scott, and A. C. Stallman (1989). ‘Morphological families in the internal lexicon’, Reading Research Quarterly 24: 262–82.Find this resource:

—— and P. A. Herman (1987). ‘Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction’, in M. McKeown and M. E. Curtis (eds.) The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 19–59.Find this resource:

Namiki, T. (2001). ‘Further evidence in support of the Righthand Head Rule in Japanese’, in J. van der Weijer and T. Nishihara (eds.) Issues in Japanese Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 277–97.Find this resource:

Napps, S. E. (1989). ‘Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships?’ Memory & Cognition 17: 729–39.Find this resource:

Nash, D. (1982). ‘Warlpiri preverbs and verb roots’, in S. Swartz (ed.) Papers in Warlpiri Grammar: In Memory of Lothar Jagst. Berrimah, Australia: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 165–216.Find this resource:

—— (1986). Topics in Warlpiri Grammar. New York / London: Garland.Find this resource:

Nattinger, J. R. and J. S. DeCarrico (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Naumann, R. and T. Gamerschlag (2003). ‘Constraining the combinatorial patterns of Japanese V-V compounds: An analysis in dynamic event semantics’, Journal of Semantics 20(3): 275–96.Find this resource:

Nayak, N. P. and R. W. Gibbs (1990). ‘Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms’, Journal of Experimental Psychology General 119: 315–30.Find this resource:

Ndiaye, M. D. (2004). Éléments de morphologie du wolof. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Nedjalkov, I. (1997). Evenki. London / New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Neeleman, A. (1994). ‘Complex Predicates.’ Led PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Find this resource:

Neijt, A., L. Krebbers, and P. Fikkert (2002). ‘Rhythm and semantics in the selection of linking elements’, in H. Broekhuis and P Fikkert (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 2002. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 117–27.Find this resource:

Neščimenko, G. P. (1963). ‘Zakonomernosti slovoobrazovanija, semantiki i upotreblenija suščestvitelʼnyx s suffiksami subjektivnoj ocenki v sovremennom českom jazyke’, in Issledovanija po češskomu jazyku: Voprosy slovoobrazovanija i gramatiki. Moscow, 105–58.Find this resource:

—— (1968). Istorija imennogo slovoobrazovanija v češskom literaturnom jazyke konca XVIII–XX vekov. Moscow.Find this resource:

Nespor, M. and A. Ralli (1996). ‘Morphology—phonology interface: Phonological domains in Greek compounds’, The Linguistic Review 13: 357–82.Find this resource:

Newman, P. (2000). The Hausa Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Find this resource:

Newmeyer, F. J. (1986). Linguistic Theory in America, 2nd edn. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—— (1996). Generative Linguistics: A Historical Perspective. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

(p. 654) Nicoladis, E. (1999). ‘Where is my brush-teeth? Acquisition of compound nouns in a French-English bilingual child’, Bilingualism, Language and Cognition 2: 245–56.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘What's the difference between “toilet paper” and “paper toilet”? French-English bilingual children's crosslinguistic transfer in compound nouns’, Journal of Child Language 29: 843–63.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Cross-linguistic transfer in deverbal compounds of preschool bilingual children’, Bilingualism, Language and Cognition 6: 17–31.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘When level-ordering is not used in the formation of English compounds’, First Language 25: 331–46.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Preschool children's acquisition of compounds’, in G. Libben and G. Jarema (eds.) The Representation and Processing of Compounds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 96–124.Find this resource:

—— and H. Yin (2002). ‘The role of frequency in acquistion of English and Chinese compounds by bilingual children’, in B. Skarabela et al. (eds.) Proceedings of BUCLD 26. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 192–303.Find this resource:

Nikolaeva, I. and M. Tolskaya (2001). A Grammar of Udihe. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Nismyama, K. (1998). ‘V-V compounds as serialization’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 175–217.Find this resource:

Nissenbaum, J. (2000). ‘Covert movement and parasitic gaps’, in M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall, and J-Y Kim (eds.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS 30). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Find this resource:

Noailly, M. (1990). Le substantif épithète. Paris: PUF.Find this resource:

Noske, M. (2000). ‘[ATR] harmony in Turkana: A case of Faith Suffix » Faith Root’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 771–812.Find this resource:

Ogloblin, A. K. (2005). ‘Javanese’, in A. Adelaar and N. P. Himmelmann (eds.), Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London and New York: Routledge, 590–624.Find this resource:

Olschansky, H. (1996). Volksetymologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Olsen, B. A. (2002). ‘Thoughts on Indo-European compounds—Inspired by a look at Armenian’, Transactions ofthe Philological Society 100(2): 233–57.Find this resource:

Olsen, S. (1986). Wortbildung im Deutschen. Eine Einführung in die Theorie der Wortstruktur. Stuttgart: Kröner.Find this resource:

—— (2000a). ‘Composition’, in G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds.) Morphologie / Morphology. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter, 897–916.Find this resource:

—— (2000b). ‘Compounding and stress in English: A closer look at the boundary between morphology and syntax’, Linguistische Berichte 181: 55–69.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Copulative compounds: A closer look at the interface between morphology and syntax’, Yearbook of Morphology 2000. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 279–320.Find this resource:

Ortner, L. and E. Müller-Bollhagen (1991). Deutsche Wortbildung. Vierter Hauptteil: Substantivkomposita. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Osgood, C. E. and R. Hoosain (1974). ‘Salience of the word as a unit in the perception of language’, Perception & Psychophysics 1: 168–92.Find this resource:

Oshita, H. (1995). ‘Compounds: A view from suffixation and A-structure alteration’, Yearbook of Morphology 1994. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 179–205.Find this resource:

Oster, U. (2004). ‘From relational schemas to subject-specific semantic relations: A two-step classification of compound terms’, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2: 235–59.Find this resource:

(p. 655) Osthoff, H. 1878. Das Verbum in der Nominalcomposition im Deutschen, Griechischen, Romanischen, und Slavischen. Jena: Naumburg a/S.Find this resource:

Packard, J. (1998). ‘Introduction’, in J. Packard (ed.) New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–34.Find this resource:

—— 2000. The Morphology of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Pan, W., B. Ye, and Y. Han (2004). References Hanyu de goucifa yanjiu [Research on Word Formation in Chinese]. Shanghai: Huadong Shifan Daxue Chubanshe.Find this resource:

Paul, H. (1920 [1960]). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Find this resource:

Payne, D. (1986). ‘Noun classification in Yagua’, in C. Craig (ed.) Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 113–31.Find this resource:

—— (1991). ‘A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retentions’, in D. C. Derbyshire and G. K. Pullum (eds.) Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. 3. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 355–499.Find this resource:

Payne, J. and R. Huddleston (2002). ‘Nouns and Noun Phrases’, in R. Huddleston and G. K. Pullum. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 323–524.Find this resource:

Pennanen, E. (1996). Contributions to the study of back-formation in English. Tampere: Acta Academiae Socialis Ser. A. Vol 4. Julkaisija Yhteiskunnallinen Korkeakoulu.Find this resource:

—— (1980). ‘On the function and behaviour of stress in English noun compounds’, English Studies 61: 252–63.Find this resource:

Petersen, W. (1914/15). ‘Über den Ursprung der Exozentrika’, Indogermanische Forschungen 30: 58–64.Find this resource:

Phillips, C. (2003). ‘Linear order and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 34(1): 37–90.Find this resource:

Pimenova, N. (2004). ‘Nominale Stammbildungssuffixe als Derivationsmittel im (Gemein) Germanischen’, in J. Clackson and B. A. Olsen (eds.) Indo-European Word-Formation. Proceedings of the Conference Held at the University Of Copenhagen, October 20th–22nd 2000. University of Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 249–68.Find this resource:

Pitt, D. and J. J. Katz (2000). ‘Compositional idioms’, Language 76: 409–32.Find this resource:

Plag, I. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2006a). ‘Morphology in pidgins and creoles’, in K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier. Vol 8: 304–8.Find this resource:

—— (2006b). ‘The variability of compound stress in English: Structural, semantic and analogical factors’, English Language and Linguistics 10/1: 143–72Find this resource:

Plénat, M. (1998). ‘De quelques paramétres intervenant dans lʼoralisation des sigles en français’, Cahiers dʼEtudes Romanes: 27–52.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Prolégomènes à une étude variationniste des hypocoristiques à redoublement en français’, Cahiers de Grammaire: 183–219.Find this resource:

—— (2008). ‘Les contraintes de taille’, in B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux, and M. Plénat (eds.) Aperçus de morphologie du français. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Find this resource:

Pohl, D. (1977). Die Nominalkomposition im Alt- und Gemeinslavischen. Ein Beitrag zur slavischen, indogermanischen und allgemeinen Wortbildung. Klagenfurter Beitrage zur Sprachwissenschaft Beiheft 1. Klagenfurt: Klagenfurter Sprachwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft.Find this resource:

Polenz, P. von (1973). ‘Synpleremik I. Wortbildung’, in H. Althaus et al. (eds.) Lexikon der germanistischen Linguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 145–63.Find this resource:

Pollatsek, A. and J. Hyönä (2005). ‘The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words’, Language & Cognitive Processes 20: 261–90.Find this resource:

(p. 656) Pollatsek, A. and R. Bertram (2000). ‘The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 26: 820–33.Find this resource:

Portner, P. and B. H. Partee (eds.) (2002). Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Postal, P. M. (1969). ‘Anaphoric Islands’, Chicago Linguistic Society 5: 205–39.Find this resource:

Pullum, G. K. and R. Huddleston (2002). ‘Adjectives and Adverbs’, in R. Huddleston and G. K. Pullum. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 525–96.Find this resource:

Pümpel-Mader, M. et al. (1992). Deutsche Wortbildung. Fünfter Hauptteil: Adjektivkompo- sita und Partizipialbildungen. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Puzynina, J. (1969). Nazwy czynności we współczesnym jȩzyku polskim (slowotwórstwo, semantyka, skladnia), vol. 1. Rozprawy Uniwesytetu Warszawskiego Nr. 40. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo UW.Find this resource:

Radden, G. and R. Dirven (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

[RAE] Real Academia Española (1931). Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Find this resource:

Raimy, E. (2000). ‘Remarks on Backcopying’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 541–52.Find this resource:

Rainer, F. and S. Varela (1992). ‘Compounding in Spanish’, Rivista di Linguistica 4:117–42.Find this resource:

Ralli, A. (1992). ‘Compounds in Modern Greek’, Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 143–74.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘A feature-based analysis of Greek nominal inflection’, Glossolojia 11–12: 201–28.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘The role of morphology in gender determination: Evidence from Modern Greek’, Linguistics 40(3): 519–51.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Stem-based vs. word-based morphological configurations: The case of Modern Greek preverbs’, Lingue e Linguaggio 3(2): 241–75.Find this resource:

—— (2005). Morfologia. [Morphology.] Athens: Patakis.Find this resource:

—— (2007). I Sinthesi Lekseon: Diaglossiki prosengisi. [Compounding: A cross-linguistic approach.] Athens: Patakis.Find this resource:

—— (2008a). ‘Compound markers and parametric variation’, Language Typology and Universals 61(1): 19–38.Find this resource:

—— (2008b). ‘Composés déverbaux grecs à radicaux liés’, in D. Amiot (ed.) La Composition dans une Perspective Typologique. Arras: Artois Presses Université, 189–210.Find this resource:

—— and A. Karasimos (2007). ‘Compound constituency and compound-internal derivation.’ Paper delivered at 8th International Conference of Greek Linguistics, Ioannina: 30 August - 1 September 2007.Find this resource:

—— and M. Stavrou (1998). ‘Morphology—syntax interface: A-N compounds vs. A-N constructs in modern Greek’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1997. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 243–64.Find this resource:

Ramers, K. H. (1997). ‘Die Kunst der Fuge: Zum morphologischen Status von Verbin-dungselementen in Nominalkomposita’, in C. Dürscheid, M. Schwarz, and K. H. Ramers (eds.) Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 33–46.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, M. and B. Levin (1992). ‘-er Nominals: Implications for a theory of argument structure’, in T. Stowell and E. Wehrli (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 26: Syntax and the Lexicon. New York, NY: Academic Press, 127–53.Find this resource:

Rastle, K., M. H. Davis, W. D. Marslen-Wilson, and L. K. Tyler (2000). ‘Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study’, Language & Cognitive Processes 15: 507–37.Find this resource:

(p. 657) Ravid, D. D. (1990). ‘Internal structure constraints on new-word formation devices in Modern Hebrew’, Folia Linguistica 24: 289–346.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘Between syntax and the lexicon: The parallel between N-N compounds and N-A strings in acquisition’, in A. Sorace, C. Heycock, and R. Shillcock (eds.) Proceedings of the GALA 1997 Conference on Language Acquisition. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, 138–41.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Word-level morphology: A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew nominals’, Morphology 16: 127–48.Find this resource:

—— and A. Avidor (1998). ‘Acquisition of derived nominals in Hebrew: Developmental and linguistic principles’, Journal of Child Language 25: 229–66.Find this resource:

—— and R. A. Berman (in press). ‘Developing linguistic register in different text types: The case of Hebrew.’ Pragmatics and Cognition.Find this resource:

—— and Y. Shlesinger (1987). ‘On the classification and structure of-suffixed adjectives’, Hebrew Linguistics 25: 59–70. [In Hebrew.]Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘Factors in the selection of compound-type in spoken and written Hebrew’, Language Sciences 17: 147–79.Find this resource:

—— and S. Zilberbuch (2003a). ‘Morpho-syntactic constructs in the development of spoken and written Hebrew text production’, Journal of Child Language 30: 395–418.Find this resource:

—— (2003b). ‘The development of complex nominals in expert and non-expert writing: A comparative study’, Pragmatics and Cognition 11: 267–97.Find this resource:

Refsing, K. (1986). The Ainu Language. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Find this resource:

Reicustein, A. D. (1984). Nemeckie ustojčivye frazy i ustojčivye oredikativnye edinicy. Moscow.Find this resource:

Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

—— and T. Siloni. (2005). ‘The lexicon-syntax parameter: ReXexivization and other arity operations’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 389–436.Find this resource:

Renouf, A. and L. Bauer (2000). ‘Contextual clues to word-meaning’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2: 231–58.Find this resource:

Reuse, W. J. de. (1994). ‘Noun incorporation in Lakota (Siouan)’, International Journal of American Linguistics 60(3): 199–260.Find this resource:

—— (2006). A Practical Grammar of the San Carlos Apache Language. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Rice, K. (1988). ‘Continuant voicing in Slave (Northern Athapaskan): The cyclic application of default rules’, in M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds.) Theoretical Morphology. Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, 371–88.Find this resource:

—— (1989). A Grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Doubling of agreement in Slave (Northern Athapaskan)’, in A. Carnie and H. Harley (eds.) Form and Function: Essays in Honor of Eloise Jelinek. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 51–78.Find this resource:

Riegel, M., J.-C. Pellax, and R. Rioul (1994). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.Find this resource:

Riehemann, S. (1998). ‘Type-based derivational morphology’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 49–77.Find this resource:

Riese, T. (2001). Vogul. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Ritter, E. (1988). ‘A Head-Movement approach to Construct-State NPs’, Linguistics 26(6): 909–29.Find this resource:

Rivero, M. L. (1992). ‘Adverb incorporation and the syntax of adverbs in Modern Greek’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 289–331.Find this resource:

(p. 658) Rivet, A. (1999). ‘Rektionskomposita und Inkorporationstheorie’, Linguistische Berichte 179: 307–42.Find this resource:

Roach, P. (1983). English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Robins, R. H. (1958). The Yurok Language: Grammar, Texts, Lexicon. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Roelofs, A. and R. H. Baayen (2002). ‘Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9: 132–8.Find this resource:

Roeper, T. (1988). ‘Compound syntax and head movement’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 187–228.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Leftward movement in morphology.’ Ms. UMASS.Find this resource:

—— and M. E. A. Siegel (1978). ‘A lexical transformation for verbal compounds’, Linguistic Inquiry 9: 199–260.Find this resource:

—— W. Snyder, and K. Hiramatsu (2002). ‘Learnability in a minimalist framework: Root compounds, merger, and the syntax—morphology interface’, in I. Lasser (ed.) The Process of Language Acquisition. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag, 25–37.Find this resource:

Rohrer, C. (1966). Review of R. B. Lees, The Grammar of English Nominalizations 2nd printing. Indogermanische Forschungen 71: 161–70.Find this resource:

Rosen, E. (2003). ‘Systematic irregularity in Japanese rendaku’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48: 1–37.Find this resource:

Rosen, S. T. (1989). ‘Two types of noun incorporation’, Language 65: 294–317.Find this resource:

Ross, J. R. (1968). ‘Constraints on variables in syntax.’ PhD. dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

Roudet, L. (1921). ‘Sur la classification psychologique des changements sémantiques’, Journal de Psychologie 18: 676–92.Find this resource:

Rubenstein, H. and I. Pollack (1963). ‘Word predictability and intelligibility’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2: 147–58.Find this resource:

Rubin, G. S., C. A. Becker, and R. H. Freeman (1979). ‘Morphological structure and its effect on visual word recognition’, Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 18: 757–67.Find this resource:

Ryder, M. E. (1990). ‘Ordered Chaos: A cognitive model for the interpretation of English Noun-Noun compounds.’ PhD dissertation. LaJolla: University of California at San Diego.Find this resource:

—— (1994). Ordered Chaos: The Interpretation of English Noun-Noun Compounds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Sadler, L. and A. Spencer (1998). ‘Morphology and argument structure’, in A. Spencer and A. Zwicky (eds.) The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 206–36.Find this resource:

Sadock, J. (1991). Autolexical Syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘On the autonomy of compounding morphology’, in S. G. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari, and P. M. Farrell (eds.) Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 161–87.Find this resource:

Salas, A. (1992). El mapuche o araucano. Madrid: Editorial MAPFRE.Find this resource:

Sambor, J. (1976). ‘Kompozycje rzeczownikowe dwunominalne i nominalno-werbalne w tekstach współczesnego jçzyka polskiego’, in M. R. Mayenowa (ed.) Semantyka tekstu i jȩzyka. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy Imienia Ossolińskich, 239–56.Find this resource:

Sampson, R. (1980). ‘Stress in English N + N phrases: A further complicating factor’, English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature 3: 264–70.Find this resource:

Sandra, D. (1990). ‘On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 42A: 529–67.Find this resource:

(p. 659) —— (1994). ‘The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective’, Language & Cognitive Processes 9: 227–69.Find this resource:

Santen, A. van (1979). ‘Een nieuw voorstel voor een transformationele behandeling van composita en bepaalde adjectief-substantief kombinaties’, Spectator 9: 240–62.Find this resource:

Sato, Y. (2007). ‘Phrasal compounding and the Lexicalist Hypothesis: A multiple Spell-Out account.’ Paper presented at the 2007 International Conference on Linguistics in Korea, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea, 20 January 2007.Find this resource:

Savini, M. (1983). ‘Phrasal compounds in Afrikaans.’ M.A. thesis, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.Find this resource:

Scalise, S. (1984). Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

—— (1992). ‘Compounding in Italian’, in S. Scalise (ed.) The Morphology of Compounding.Find this resource:

Special issue of

Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 175–200.Find this resource:

Scalise, S., A. Bisetto, and E. Guevara (2005). ‘Selection in compounding and derivation’, in W. U. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. E. Pfeiffer, and F. Rainer (eds.) Morphology and its Demarcation. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 133–50.Find this resource:

Scalise, S. and E. Guevara (2005). ‘The Lexicalist approach to word-formation’, in P. Ňtekauer and R. Lieber (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 147–87.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Searching for universals in compounding.’ Ms. University of Bologna.Find this resource:

Scarborough, D. L., C. Cortese, and H. S. Scarborough (1977). ‘Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 3: 1–17.Find this resource:

Schachter, P. (1962). ‘Review of The Grammar of English Nominalizations by Robert B. Lees’, International Journal of American Linguistics 28: 134–46.Find this resource:

Schebeck, B. (1974). Texts on the Social System of the Atynyamaṱaṋa People with Grammatical Notes. Canberra: The Australian National University.Find this resource:

Schindler, J. (1997). ‘Zur internen Syntax der indogermanischen Nominalkomposition’, in E. Crespo and J. L. García-Ramón (eds.) Berthold Delbrück y la sintaxis indoeuropea hoy. Actas del Coloquio de la Indogermanische Gesellschaft, Madrid, 21–24 septiembre de 1994. Madrid/Wiesbaden: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/Reichert, 537–40.Find this resource:

Scumerling, Susan (1976). Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Austin: University of Texas Press.Find this resource:

Schmid, H.-J. (2007). ‘Entrenchment, salience and basic levels’, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169–203.Find this resource:

Schreuder, R. and R. H. Baayen (1995). Modeling Morphological Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘How complex simple words can be’, Journal of Memory and Language 37:118–39.Find this resource:

Schriefers, H., P. Zwitserlood, and A. Roelofs (1991). ‘The identification of morphologically complex spoken words: Continuous processing or decomposition?’ Journal of Memory and Language 30: 26–47.Find this resource:

Schu, J. (2005). ‘Zwischen Grundmorphem und Affix’, Deutsche Sprache 33: 258–86.Find this resource:

Schwarze, C. (2005). ‘Grammatical and para-grammatical word formation’, Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 137–62.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘La notion de règle morphologique et les mots complexes non construits’, in N. Hathout and F. Montermini (eds.) Morphologie à Toulouse. Actes du colloque international de morphologie 4èmes Décembrettes. Munich: Lincom Europa, 221–43.Find this resource:

Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

(p. 660) Semenza, C. and S. Mondini (2006). ‘The neuropsychology of compound words’, in G. Libben and G. Jarema (eds.) The Representation and Processing of Compound Words. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 71–95.Find this resource:

Seroussi, B. (2004). ‘Hebrew derived nouns in context: A developmental perspective’, Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 56: 273–90.Find this resource:

Shibatani, M. (1990). The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— and T. Kageyama (1988). ‘Word formation in a modular theory of grammar’, Language 64: 451–84.Find this resource:

Shillcock, R. (1990). Lexical Hypotheses in Continuous Speech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Shimron, J. (ed.) (2003). Language Processing and Language Acquisition in a Root-Based Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Shlesinger, Y. and D. D. Ravid (1998) ‘The double compound in Modern Hebrew: Redundancy or an independent existence?’ Hebrew Linguistics 43: 85–97. [In Hebrew.]Find this resource:

Shlonsky, U. (1990). ‘Construct State nominals and Universal Grammar’. Ms. University of Haifa.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘The form of Noun Phrases.’ Ms. University of Geneva.Find this resource:

Sichel, I. (2000). ‘Remnant and phrasal movement in Hebrew adjectives and possessives.’ Ms. CUNY Graduate Center.Find this resource:

Siddiqi, D. A. (2006). ‘Minimize exponence: Economy effects on a model of the morphosyntactic component of the grammar.’ PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Find this resource:

Siegel, D. (1974). ‘Topics in English Morphology.’ PhD Dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

Siegel, M. E. A. (1980). Capturing the Adjective. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Siloni, T. (1997). Noun Phrases and Nominalizations: The Syntax of DPs. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Construct states at the PF interface’, in P. Pica and J. Rooryck (eds.) Linguistic Variations Yearbook, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 321–33.Find this resource:

Simpson, J. (1991). Warlpiri Morphosyntax: A Lexicalist Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Preferred word order, argument structure and the grammaticalisation of associated path’, in M. Butt and T. H. King (eds.) Time over Matter: Diachronic Perspectives on Morphosyntax. Stanford: CSLI, 173–208.Find this resource:

Skautrup, P. (1944). Det Danske Sprogs Historie. 5 vols. Copenhagen: Nordisk.Find this resource:

Skousen, R. (1989). Analogical Modelling of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Slobin, D. (1985). ‘Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity’, in D. Slobin (ed.) The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical Issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1157–26.Find this resource:

—— (1996). ‘From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”’, in J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (eds.) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 70–86.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events’, in S. Strömqvist and L. Verhoeven (eds.) Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 219–58.Find this resource:

Smeets, I. (1989). A Mapuche Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Find this resource:

Smith, E. E. and D. N. Osherson (1984). ‘Conceptual combination with prototype concepts’, Cognitive Science 8: 337–61.Find this resource:

—— L. J. Rips, and M. Keane (1988). ‘Combining prototypes: A selective modification model’, Cognitive Science 12: 485–527.Find this resource:

(p. 661) Snyder, W. and D. Chen (1997). ‘On the syntax—morphology interface in the acquisition of French and English’, in K. Kusumoto (ed.) Proceedings of NELS 27. Amherst: GLSA, 413–23.Find this resource:

Søgaard, A. (2005). ‘Compounding theories and linguistic diversity’, in Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges, and D. S. Rood (eds.) Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 319–37.Find this resource:

Sonomura, M. O. (1996). Idiomaticity in the Basic Writing of American English. New York: Peter Lang.Find this resource:

Spencer, A. (1988). ‘Bracketing paradoxes and the English lexicon’, Language 64: 663–82.Find this resource:

—— (1991). Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘Incorporation in Chukchi’, Language 71: 439–89.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Morphonological operations’, in A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.) The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 123–43.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Does English have productive compounding’, in G. Booij, J. DeCesaris, A. Ralli, and S. Scalise (eds.) Topics in Morphology: Selected Papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (Barcelona, 20–22 September 2001). Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Applicada, Universtitat Pompeu Fabra, 329–41.Find this resource:

—— and M. D. Zaretskaya (1998). ‘Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination’, Linguistics 36: 1–40.Find this resource:

Spore, P. (1965). La langue danoise. Copenhagen: Akademisk.Find this resource:

Sportiche, D. (1999). Reconstruction, Constituency and Morphology. Berlin: GLOW.Find this resource:

Sproat, R. (1985). ‘On deriving the lexicon.’ PhD Dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

Stanners, R. F., J. J. Neiser, W. P. Hernon, and R. Hall (1979). ‘Memory representation for morphologically related words’, Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 18: 399–412.Find this resource:

Starosta, S., K. Kuiper, Z. Wu, and S. A. Ng (1998). ‘On defining the Chinese compound word: Headedness in Chinese compounding and Chinese VR compounds’, in J. Packard (ed.) New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 346–69.Find this resource:

Stein, G. (2000). ‘The function of word-formation and the case of English -cum-’, in C. Dalton-Puffer and N. Ritt (eds.) Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 277–88.Find this resource:

Štekauer, P. 1996. A Theory of Conversion in English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Find this resource:

—— (1997a). ‘On the semiotics of proper names and their conversion’, AAA—Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 22(1): 27–36.Find this resource:

—— (1997b). ‘On some issues of blending in English word formation’, Linguistica Pragensia 7: 26–35.Find this resource:

—— (1998). An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-Formation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (2000). English Word-Formation: A History of Research (1960–1995). Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Fundamental principles of an onomasiological theory of English word-formation’, Onomasiology Online 2: 1–42.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘On the theory of neologisms and nonce-formations’, Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 97–112.Find this resource:

—— (2005a). Meaning Predictability in Word Formation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (2005b). ‘Onomasiological approach to word-formation’, in P. Štekauer and R. Lieber (eds.) Handbook of Word-formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 207–32.Find this resource:

(p. 662) —— D. Chapman, S. Tomaščíková, and Š. Franko (2005). ‘Word-formation as creativity within productivity constraints: Sociolinguistic evidence’, Onomasiology Online 6: 1–55.Find this resource:

—— and R. Lieber (eds.) (2005). Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

—— S. Valera, and L. Kőrtvélyessy (2007). ‘Universals, tendencies and typology in word-formation. Cross-linguistic research.’ Ms.Find this resource:

—— S. Valera, and A. Diaz (2007). ‘Meaning predictability and conversion.’ Ms.Find this resource:

—— J. Zimmermann, and R. Gregová. (2007). ‘Stress in compounds: An experimental research’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54: 193–215.Find this resource:

Stirling, L. and R. Huddleston (2002). ‘Deixis and anaphora’, in R. Huddleston and G. K. Pullum. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1449–564.Find this resource:

Sugioka, Y. (2005). ‘Multiple mechanisms underlying morphological productivity’, in S. Mufwene, E. Francis, and R. Wheeler (eds.) Polymorphous Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 203–23.Find this resource:

Sullivan, T. D. (1998)[1976]. Compendio de la gramática náhuatl. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Find this resource:

Sun, C. (2006). Chinese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Sweetser, E. (1999). ‘Compositionality and blending: Semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework’, in T. Janssen and G. Redeker (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 129–62.Find this resource:

Swinney, D. A. and A. Cutler (1979). ‘The access and processing of idiomatic expressions’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 523–34.Find this resource:

Szymanek, B. (1988). Categories and Categorization in Morphology. Lublin: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski.Find this resource:

—— (1996). ‘Parametric dimensions in morphology: On inalienable possession in English and Polish’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 43(1–2): 255–75.Find this resource:

—— (1998). Introduction to Morphological Analysis. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Find this resource:

Tabossi, P. and F. Zardon 1993. ‘The activation of idiomatic meaning in spoken language comprehension’, in C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi (eds.). Idioms: Structure, Processing and Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 145–62.Find this resource:

Taft, M. (1979). ‘Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS)’, Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 18: 21–39.Find this resource:

—— (1985). ‘Lexical access codes in visual and auditory word recognition’, Language and Cognitive Processes 1: 297–308.Find this resource:

—— (1991). Reading and the Mental Lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ/England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Find this resource:

—— (1994). ‘Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing’, Language & Cognitive Processes 9: 271–94.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57: 745–65.Find this resource:

—— and K. I. Forster (1975). ‘Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words’, Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 14: 638–47.Find this resource:

—— (1976). ‘Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15: 607–20.Find this resource:

—— and P. Kougious (2004). ‘The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words’, Brain and Language 90: 9–16.Find this resource:

(p. 663) Tai, J. H-Y. (2003). ‘Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese’, Language and Linguistics 4(2): 301–16.Find this resource:

Tamura, S. (2000). The Ainu Language. Tokyo: Sanseido.Find this resource:

Tang, T-C. (1989). Studies on Chinese Morphology and Syntax: 2. Taipei: Student Book Co.Find this resource:

Taylor, J. R. (1996). Possessives in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Terrace, H. (1979). Nim. New York: Knopf.Find this resource:

Thiersch, C. (1993). ‘On the formal properties of constituent coordination.’ Paper presented at the 16th GLOW Colloquium. GLOW Newsletter 30: 70–71.Find this resource:

Thompson, D. W. (1992). On Growth and Form. New York: Dover.Find this resource:

Thompson, L. C. and M. T. Thompson (1992). The Thompson Language. Missoula: University of Montana.Find this resource:

Thráinsson, H., H. P. Petersen, J í Lon Jacobsen, and Z. S. Hansen (2004). Faroese. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag.Find this resource:

Tolchinsky, L. and E. Rosado (2005). ‘Literacy, text type, and modality in use of grammatical means for agency alternation in Spanish’, Journal of Pragmatics 37: 209–38.Find this resource:

Tollemache, F. (1945). Le parole composte nella lingua italiana. Rome: Rores.Find this resource:

Toman, J. (1983). Wortsyntax. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Find this resource:

Tomasello, M. (2000). ‘Do young children have adult syntactic competence?’ Cognition 74: 209–53.Find this resource:

—— (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Toorn, M. C. van den (1981). ‘De tussenklank in samenstellingen waarvan het eerste lid systematisch uitheems is’, De Nieuwe Taalgids 74: 197–205 and 547–52.Find this resource:

—— (1982). ‘Tendenzen bij de beregeling van de verbindingsklank in nominale samenstellingen’, De Nieuwe Taalgids 75: 24–33 and 153–60.Find this resource:

Triantaphyllidis, M. (1941). Neoelliniki Grammatiki [Modern Greek Grammar]. Athens: OEDB.Find this resource:

Trommelen, M. and W. Zonneveld (1986). ‘Dutch morphology: Evidence for the right-hand head rule’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 147–69.Find this resource:

Tserepis, G. (1902). Ta Sintheta tis Ellinikis Glossis [Compounds of the Greek Language]. Athens: Sakellariou.Find this resource:

Tuggy, D. (2007). ‘Schematicity’, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 82–116.Find this resource:

Uhlich, J. (2002). ‘Verbal governing compounds (synthetics) in early Irish and other Celtic languages’, Transactions of the Philological Society 100(3): 403–33.Find this resource:

Ungerer, F. (2002). ‘The conceptual function of derivational word-formation in English’, Anglia 120: 534–67.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Word-formation’, in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 650–75.Find this resource:

—— and H-J. Schmid (1998). ‘Englische Komposita und Kategorisierung’, Rostocker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 5: 77–98.Find this resource:

—— (2006). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics, 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Find this resource:

Uriagereka, J. (1999). ‘Multiple Spell-Out’, in S. D. Epstein and M. Hornstein (eds.) Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 251–83.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Pure adjuncts.’ Ms. University of Maryland.Find this resource:

(p. 664) Vachek, J. (1975). A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General Linguistic Basis. Prague: Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.Find this resource:

Val Alvaro, J. F. (1999). ‘La composición’, in I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.) Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol. 3. Madrid: Espasa, 4757–841.Find this resource:

Vallés, T. (2003). ‘Lexical creativity and the organization of the lexicon’, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1: 137–60.Find this resource:

Van Valin, R. and R. LaPolla (1997). Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Varela, S. (1990). Fundamentos de morfología. Madrid: Sintesis.Find this resource:

—— (2005). Morfología léxica: la formación de palabras. Madrid: Gredos.Find this resource:

—— and J. García (1999). ‘La prefijación’, in I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 3. Madrid: Espasa, 4992–5039.Find this resource:

Villoing, F. (2002). ‘Les mots composés [V N]N/A du français: réflexions épistémologiques et propositions dʼanalyse.’ Doctoral thesis, Département de Linguistiqué, Université de Paris X.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Les mots composés VN du français: arguments en faveur dʼune construction morphologique’, Cahiers de Grammaire 28: 183–96.Find this resource:

—— (2008). ‘Les mots composés VN’, in B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux, and M. Plénat (eds.) Aperçus de morphologie du français. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Find this resource:

Vinterberg, H. and C. A. Bodelsen (1966). Dansk-Engelsk ordbog. Andet oplag med tillaæ. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Find this resource:

Visch, E. A. M. (1989). A Metrical Theory of Rhythmic Stress Phenomena. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Vogel, I. and E. Raimy (2002). ‘The acquisition of compound vs. phrasal stress: The role of prosodic constituents’, Journal of Child Language 29: 225–50.Find this resource:

Voort, M. E. C. van de and W. Vonk (1995). ‘You don't die immediately when you kick an empty bucket: A processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristics of idioms’, in M. Everaerts et al. (eds.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Find this resource:

Wälchli, B. (2005). Co-compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Wali, K. and O. N. Koul (1997). Kashmiri. London/New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Wang Jun and Zheng Guoqjao (1993). An Outline Grammar of Mulao. Canberra: National Thai Studies Centre, The Australian National University.Find this resource:

Ward, D. (1965). The Russian Language Today. London: Hutchinson.Find this resource:

Warlpiri Lexicography Group (1986). Warlpiri—English Dictionary: Body-part section. Cambridge, MA: Lexicon Project, Center for Cognitive Science.Find this resource:

Warren, B. (1978). Semantic Patterns of Noun-Noun Compounds. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University Press.Find this resource:

Waszakowa, K. (1994). Słowotwórstwo współczesnego jȩzyka polskiego - rzeczowniki sufiksalne obce. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Czy w słowotwórstwie poj§cie hybryda jest przydatne?’, in A. Moroz and M. Wiśniewski (eds.) Studia z gramatyki i semantyki jȩzyka polskiego. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 111–19.Find this resource:

—— (2005). Przejawy internacjonalizacji w słowotwórstwie współczesnej polszczyzny. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Find this resource:

Weerman, F. P. (1989). ‘The V2 Conspiracy.’ PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Find this resource:

(p. 665) Wegener, H. (2003). ‘Entstehung und Funktion der Fugenelemente im Deutschen, oder: Warum wir keine * Autosbahn haben’, Linguistische Berichte 196: 425–57.Find this resource:

Weldon, M. S. (1991). ‘Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17: 526–41.Find this resource:

Werner, H. (1998). Probleme der Wortbildung in den Jenissej-Sprachen. Lincom Studies in Asian Linguistics. Munich/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Wheeler, D. D. (1970). ‘Processes in word recognition’, Cognitive Psychology 1: 59–85.Find this resource:

Whitehead, C. R. (2004). A reference grammar of Menya, an Angan language of Papua New Guinea. PhD dissertation, Winnipeg, University of Manitoba.Find this resource:

Whitney, W. D. (1875). The Life and Growth of Language, 6th edn. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.Find this resource:

—— (1889). Sanskrit Grammar. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Hartel.Find this resource:

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Wiese, R. (1996a). ‘Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 27: 183–93.Find this resource:

—— (1996b). The Phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon.Find this resource:

Wilhelm, A. and L. Saxon (2007). ‘The syntax of numerals in two Dene languages’, in the Proceedings of the Workshop on Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas (WSCLA).Find this resource:

Williams, E. (1981). ‘On the notions Lexically related and Head of a Word’, Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245–74.Find this resource:

—— (1994). Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Windsor, J. (1993). ‘The function of novel word compounds’, Journal of Child Language 20: 119–38.Find this resource:

Wisniewski, E. J. (1996). ‘Construal and similarity in conceptual combination’, Journal of Memory and Language 35: 434–53.Find this resource:

—— and B. C. Love (1998). ‘Relations versus properties in conceptual combination’, Journal of Memory and Language 38: 177–202.Find this resource:

—— and G. L. Murphy (2005). ‘Frequency of relation type as a determinant of conceptual combination: A reanalysis’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31: 169–74.Find this resource:

Wurmbrand, S. (2003a). Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (2003b). ‘Syntactic vs. post-syntactic movement.’ Ms. University of Connecticut.Find this resource:

Xia, M. (1946). Methods of Composing Two-character Words [Cited in Pan, Ye, and Han 2004].Find this resource:

Xing, J. Z. (2006). Teaching and Learning Chinese As a Foreign Language: A Pedagogical Grammar. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Find this resource:

Yumoto, Y. (2005). Hukugoo-dooshi Hasei-dooshi no Imi to Toogo [Semantics and Syntax of Compound Verbs and Derived Verbs]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Find this resource:

Zagona, K. (1988). Verb Phrase Syntax: A Parametric Study of English and Spanish. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

Zamponi, R. (2003). Maipure. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Sullʼenclitico relativizzatore -li in maipure-yavitero’, Thule 14/15: 163–93.Find this resource:

Žepić, S. (1970). Morphologie und Semantik der deutschen Nominalkomposita. Zagreb: Philosophische Fakultät der Universität Zagreb.Find this resource:

(p. 666) Zhou, X., W. Marslen-Wilson, M. Taft, and H. Shu (1999). ‘Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words’, Language & Cognitive Processes 14: 525–65.Find this resource:

Zhu, D. (1982). References Yufa jiangyi [Lectures on grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Find this resource:

Zimmer, K. E. (1971). ‘Some general observations about nominal compounds’, Working Papers on Language Universals [Stanford University] 5: 1–21.Find this resource:

—— (1972). ‘Appropriateness conditions for nominal compounds’, Working Papers on Language Universals [Stanford University] 8: 3–20.Find this resource:

Zur, B. (1983). ‘On the acquisition of definiteness by Hebrew-speaking children. MA thesis, Tel Aviv University. [In Hebrew.]Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Reference marking in narrative development.’ PhD Dissertation, Bar Ilan University. [In Hebrew.]Find this resource:

Zwanenburg, W. (1992). ‘La composition dans les langues romanes et germaniques: essuiglace/windshield-wiper.’ Paper presented at the ‘Congrès des Romanistes’.Find this resource:

Zwicky, A. (1985). ‘Heads’, Journal of Linguistics 21: 1–29.Find this resource:

Zwitserlood, P. (1994). ‘The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds’, Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 341–68.Find this resource:

—— J. Bölte, and P. Dohmes (2000). ‘Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture naming’, Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 563–91.Find this resource:

—— A. Bolwiender, and E. Drews (2005). ‘Priming morphologically complex verbs by sentence contexts: Effects of semantic transparency and ambiguity’, Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 395–415.Find this resource: