Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 17 May 2021

(p. 638) (p. 639) References

(p. 638) (p. 639) References

Abinal, Antoine and Malzac, Victorin (1899). Dictionnaire français–malgache. Imprimerie de la Mission Catholique, Mahamasina.Find this resource:

Abney, Stephen (1987). The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Abreu, Ana Maria, Macaluso, Emiliano, Azevedo, Ruben, Cesari, Paola, Urgesi, Cosimo, and Aglioti, Salvatore Maria (2012). Action anticipation beyond the action observation network: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in expert basketball players. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 1646–54.Find this resource:

Abusch, Dorit (1985). On Verbs and Time. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Abusch, Dorit (1986). Verbs of change, causation and time. Technical Report 860-50, CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Acedo Matellán, Victor and Mateu, Jaume (2013). Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus, 25, 227–65.Find this resource:

Adger, David (2013). A Syntax of Substance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Aglioti, Salvatore Maria, Cesari, Paola, Romani, Michela, and Urgesi, Cosimo (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109–16.Find this resource:

Aguilar-Guevara, Ana (2014). Weak Definites: Semantics, Lexicon and Pragmatics. LOT Dissertation Series 360. LOT, Utrecht.Find this resource:

Aguilar-Guevara, Ana and Zwarts, Joost (2011). Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Proceedings of SALT 20 (ed. N. Li and D. Lutz), pp. 179–96. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, Artemis and Anagnostopoulou, Elena (2001). The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 193–231.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, Artemis and Anagnostopoulou, Elena (2007). The subject-in-situ generalization revisited. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? (ed. H.-M. Gärtner and U. Sauerland), pp. 31–60. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, Artemis and Anagnostopoulou, Elena (2008). Structuring participles. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (ed. C. Chang and H. Haynie), pp. 33–41. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena, and Schäfer, Florian (2006). The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation (ed. M. Frascarelli), pp. 187–211. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena, and Schäfer, Florian (2015). External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Allen, James (1983). Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 26, 832–43.Find this resource:

Alonge, Antonietta (1997). Semantica lessicale e proprietà sintattiche dei verbi di movimento italiani: Analisi di dati acquisiti da dizionari di macchina e da un corpus testuale computerizzato. In Atti del III Convegno della Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia (p. 640) Italiana (ed. L. Agostiniani, P. Bonucci, G. Giannecchini, F. Lorenzi, and L. Reali), pp. 31–63. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, Naples.Find this resource:

Altshuler, Daniel (2016). Events, States and Times: An Essay on Narrative Discourse in English. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Amoruso, Lucía, Gelormini, Carlos, Aboitiz, Francisco, Alvarez González, Miguel, Manes, Facundo, Cardona, Juan, and Ibanez, Agustín (2013). N400 ERPs for actions: Building meaning in context. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 57.Find this resource:

Amoruso, Lucía, Sedeño, Lucas, Huepe, David, Tomio, Ailin, Kamienkowski, Juan, Hurtado, Esteban, Cardona, Juan Felipe, Álvarez González, Miguel Ángel, Reiznik, Andrés, Sigman, Mariano, Manes, Facundo, and Ibáñez, Agustín (2014). Time to tango: Expertise and contextual anticipation during action observation. NeuroImage, 98, 366–85.Find this resource:

Anagnostopoulou, Elena (2003). Participles and voice. In Perfect Explorations (ed. A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert, and A. von Stechow), pp. 1–36. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Anagnostopoulou, Elena and Samioti, Yota (2015). Domains within words and their meanings: A case study. In The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax (ed. A. Alexiadou, H. Borer, and F. Schäfer), pp. 81–111. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Anderson, Alan Ross and Belnap, Nuel (1975). Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Find this resource:

Anderson, C. Anthony (1989). Russell on order in time. In Rereading Russell: Essays on Bertrand Russell’s Metaphysics and Epistemology (ed. C. W. Savage and C. A. Anderson), pp. 249–63. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.Find this resource:

Anderson, Curt and Morzycki, Marcin (2015). Degrees as kinds. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 33, 791–828.Find this resource:

Anderson, John (2013). The Architecture of Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.Find this resource:

Andrews, Avery (1982). A note on the constituent structure of adverbials and auxiliaries. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 313–17.Find this resource:

Anscombe, Elizabeth (1964). Before and after. Philosophical Review, 73, 3–24.Find this resource:

Aparicio, Helena, Xiang, Ming, and Kennedy, Christopher (2015). Processing gradable adjectives in context: A visual world study. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 25 (ed. S. D’Antonio, M. Moroney, and C. R. Little), pp. 413–32. Linguistic Society of America.Find this resource:

Arad, Maya (2003). Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21, 737–78.Find this resource:

Arad, Maya (2005). Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Armstrong, David (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism, Vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Armstrong, David (1997). A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Armstrong, David (2004). Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Arnold, Jennifer (2001). The effects of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference. Discourse Processes, 31, 137–62.Find this resource:

Arsenijević, Boban (2006). Inner Aspect and Telicity: The Decompositional and the Quantificational Nature of Eventualities at the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Leiden.Find this resource:

Arsenijević, Boban (2010). On the syntactic nature of manner-incorporation. Ms., Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Find this resource:

Asher, Nicholas (1992). A default, truth conditional semantics for the progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 463–508.Find this resource:

Asher, Nicholas (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

(p. 641) Asher, Nicholas (2000). Events, facts, propositions, and evolutive anaphora. In Speaking of Events (ed. J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. Varzi), pp. 123–50. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Asher, Nicholas (2011). Lexical Meaning in Context: A Web of Words. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Asher, Nicholas and Lascarides, Alex (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Aske, Jon (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (ed. K. Hall, M. Meacham, and R. Shapiro), pp. 1–14.Find this resource:

Austin, John L. (1979). Unfair to facts. In Philosophical Papers, pp. 102–22. Oxford University Press, New York.Find this resource:

Bach, Emmon (1981). On time, tense, and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics. In Radical Pragmatics (ed. P. Cole), pp. 63–81. Academic Press, New York.Find this resource:

Bach, Emmon (1986a). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 5–16.Find this resource:

Bach, Emmon (1986b). Natural language metaphysics. In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, VII (ed. R. Barcan Marcus, G. Dorn, and P. Weingartner), pp. 573–95. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Bach, Emmon (1989). Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Find this resource:

Bach, Patric, Gunter, Thomas, Knoblich, Günther, Prinz, Wolfgang, and Friederici, Angela (2009). N400-like negativities in action perception reflect the activation of two components of an action representation. Social Neuroscience, 4, 212–32.Find this resource:

Baggio, Giosuè, van Lambalgen, Michiel, and Hagoort, Peter (2008). Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 36–53.Find this resource:

Baglini, Rebekah (2012). The scalar source of stative passives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16 (ed. A. Aguilar Guevara, A. Chernilovskaya, and R. Nouwen), pp. 29–41. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Baglini, Rebekah (2015). Stative Predication and Semantic Ontology: A Cross-linguistic Study. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.Find this resource:

Baglini, Rebekah and Francez, Itamar (2016). The implications of managing. Journal of Semantics, 33, 541–60.Find this resource:

Baicchi, Annalisa (2005). Translating phrasal combinations across the typological divide. In Studies in the Semantics of Lexical Combinatory Patterns (ed. M. Bertuccelli Papi), pp. 487–519. Pisa University Press, Pisa.Find this resource:

Baker, Collin, Fillmore, Charles, and Lowe, John (1998). The Berkeley FrameNet project. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Montreal, QC, pp. 86–90. ACL.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark (1997). Thematic roles and syntactic structures. In Elements of Grammar (ed. L. Haegeman), pp. 73–137. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Balconi, Michela and Vitaloni, Silvia (2014). N400 effect when a semantic anomaly is detected in action representation. A source localization analysis. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 31, 58–64.Find this resource:

Baldwin, Dare, Baird, Jodie, Saylor, Megan, and Clark, Angela (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72, 708–17.Find this resource:

Bale, Alan (2009). A universal scale of comparison. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 1–55.Find this resource:

(p. 642) Ballarin, Roberta (2010). Modern origins of modal logic. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition) (ed. E. Zalta). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Banarescu, Laura, Bonial, Claire, Cai, Shu, Georgescu, Madalina, Griffitt, Kira, Hermjakob, Ulf, Knight, Kevin, Koehn, Philipp, Palmer, Martha, and Schneider, Nathan (2012). Abstract meaning representation (AMR) 1.0 specification.Find this resource:

Bar-el, Leora (2005). Aspectual Distinctions in Skwxwú7mesh. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia.Find this resource:

Bar-el, Leora, Davis, Henry, and Matthewson, Lisa (2005). On non-culminating accomplishments. In Proceedings of the 35th North East Linguistic Society (NELS35) (ed. L. Bateman and C. Ussery), pp. 87–102. GLSA, Amherst, MA.Find this resource:

Barker, Chris (2005). Possessive weak definites. In Possessives and Beyond: Semantics and Syntax (ed. J.-Y. Kim, Y. Lander, and B. Partee), pp. 89–113. GLSA Publications, Amherst, MA.Find this resource:

Barner, David and Bale, Alan (2002). No nouns, no verbs: Psycholinguistic arguments in favor of lexical underspecification. Lingua, 112, 771–91.Find this resource:

Barner, David and Bale, Alan (2005). No nouns, no verbs? A rejoinder to Panagiotidis. Lingua, 115, 1169–79.Find this resource:

Baron, Irène and Herslund, Michael (2005). Langues endocentriques et langues exocentriques: Approche typologique du danois, du français et de l’anglais. Langue française, 145, 35–53.Find this resource:

Baroni, Marco and Zamparelli, Roberto (2010). Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: Representing adjective–noun constructions in semantic space. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1183–93. ACL.Find this resource:

Barrie, Michael and Li, Audrey (2015). The semantics of (pseudo) incorporation and case. In The Syntax and Semantics of Pseudo-Incorporation (ed. O. Borik and B. Gehrke), pp. 159–88. Brill, Leiden.Find this resource:

Bartsch, Renate (1976). The Grammar of Adverbials. North Holland, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Bartsch, Renate and Vennemann, Theo (1973). Semantic Structures: A Study in the Relation between Syntax and Semantics. Athäenum Verlag, Frankfurt.Find this resource:

Barwise, Jon (1981). Scenes and other situations. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 369–97.Find this resource:

Barwise, Jon and Perry, John (1983). Situations and Attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Basciano, Bianca (2015). Vendlerian verb classes. In Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics (ed. R. Sybesma, W. Behr, Y. Gu, Z. Handel, and C.-T. J. Huang). Brill, Leiden.Find this resource:

Bäuerle, Rainer (1994). Zustand—Prozess—Ereignis. zur Kategorisierung von Verb(al)phrasen. Wuppertaler Arbeitspapiere zur Sprachwissenschaft, 10, 1–32.Find this resource:

Bayer, Josef (1986). The role of event expressions in grammar. Studies in Language, 10, 1–52.Find this resource:

Bayer, Samuel (1996). Confession of a Lapsed Neo-Davidsonian. Ph.D. thesis, Brown University.Find this resource:

Bealer, George (1989). On the identification of properties and propositional functions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 1–14.Find this resource:

Beaver, David (1997). Presupposition. In Handbook of Logic and Language (ed. J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen), pp. 939–1008. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Beaver, David (2001). Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Beaver, David and Condoravdi, Cleo (2007). On the logic of verbal modification. In Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium (ed. M. Aloni, P. Dekker, and F. Roelofsen), pp. 3–9. ILLC, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Beavers, John (2008a). On the nature of goal marking and delimitation: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 283–316.Find this resource:

(p. 643) Beavers, John (2008b). Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation (ed. J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow, and M. Schäfer), pp. 245–68. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Beavers, John (2010). The structure of lexical meaning: Why semantics really matters. Language, 86, 821–64.Find this resource:

Beavers, John (2011a). An aspectual analysis of ditransitive verbs of caused possession in English. Journal of Semantics, 28, 1–54.Find this resource:

Beavers, John (2011b). On affectedness. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 335–70.Find this resource:

Beavers, John and Koontz-Garboden, Andrew (2012). Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry, 43, 331–69.Find this resource:

Beavers, John and Koontz-Garboden, Andrew (2013a). In defense of the reflexivization analysis of anticausativization. Lingua, 131, 199–216.Find this resource:

Beavers, John and Koontz-Garboden, Andrew (2013b). Complications in diagnosing lexical meaning: A rejoinder to Horvath and Siloni (2013). Lingua, 134, 210–18.Find this resource:

Beavers, John, Levin, Beth, and Tham, Shiao Wei (2010). Typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46, 331–77.Find this resource:

Beck, Sigrid (2005). There and back again: A semantic analysis. Journal of Semantics, 22, 3–51.Find this resource:

Beck, Sigrid and Johnson, Kyle (2004). Double objects again. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 97–124.Find this resource:

Beck, Sigrid and Snyder, William (2001). Complex predicates and goal PPs: Evidence for a semantic parameter. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (ed. A. Do, L. Dominguez, and A. Johansen), pp. 114–22. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.Find this resource:

Beck, Sigrid, Berezovskaya, Polina, and Plugfelder, Katja (2009a). The use of again in 19th century English versus present-day English. Syntax, 12, 193–214.Find this resource:

Beck, Sigrid, Krasikova, Sveta, Fleischer, Daniel, Gergel, Remus, Hofstetter, Stefan, Savelsberg, Christiane, Vanderelst, John, and Villalta, Elisabeth (2009b). Crosslinguistic variation in comparison constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 9, 1–66.Find this resource:

Becker, Raymond, Ferretti, Todd, and Madden-Lombardi, Carol (2013). Grammatical aspect, lexical aspect, and event duration constrain the availability of events in narratives. Cognition, 129, 212–20.Find this resource:

Beebee, Helen and Dodd, Julian (2005). Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Beliën, Maaike (2002). Force dynamics in static prepositions: Dutch aan, op, and tegen. In Perspectives on Prepositions (ed. H. Cuyckens and G. Radden), pp. 195–209. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Belletti, Adriana and Rizzi, Luigi (1988). Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 6, 291–352.Find this resource:

Belnap, Nuel, Perloff, Michael, and Xu, Ming (2001). Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Bennett, Jonathan (1988). Events and their Names. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Bennett, Michael and Partee, Barbara (1972). Towards the logic of tense and aspect in English. Technical report, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Reprinted (1978) by Indiana University Linguistics Club, and (2004) in Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara H. Partee. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Berant, Jonathan, Goldberger, Jacob, and Dagan, Ido (2011). Global learning of typed entailment rules. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, OR, pp. 610–19.Find this resource:

(p. 644) Berant, Jonathan, Alon, Noga, Dagan, Ido, and Goldberger, Jacob (2015). Efficient global learning of entailment graphs. Computational Linguistics, 42, 221–63.Find this resource:

Bergh, Lars (1940). L’idée de direction exprimée par un adverbe ou par une préposition en suédois, par un verbe et une préposition en français. Studia Neophilologica, 12, 66–90.Find this resource:

Bergh, Lars (1948). Moyens d’exprimer en français l’idée de direction: Étude fondée sur une comparaison avec les langues germaniques, en particulier le suédois. Ph.D. thesis, Göteborgs Universitet.Find this resource:

Bertinetto, Pier Marco and Squartini, Mario (1995). An attempt at defining the class of ‘gradual completion’ verbs. In Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality. Volume 1: Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives (ed. P. M. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, and J. Higginbotham), pp. 11–26. Rosenberg & Sellier, Torino.Find this resource:

Beyssade, Claire and Pires de Oliveira, Roberta (2014). Weak Definites across Languages: Theoretical and Experimental Investigations. Special issue of Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, vol. 42.Find this resource:

Bierwisch, Manfred (1989). Event nominalization: Proposals and problems. Linguistische Studien (Arbeitsberichte), 194, 1–73.Find this resource:

Bierwisch, Manfred (2005). The event structure of CAUSE and BECOME. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications (ed. C. Maienborn and A. Wöllstein), pp. 11–44. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Bihrle, Amy, Brownell, Hiram, Powelson, John, and Gardner, Howard (1986). Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Cognition, 5, 399–411.Find this resource:

Binnick, Robert (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Bittner, Maria (2006). Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics). Theoretical Linguistics, 32, 47–56.Find this resource:

Blackburn, Patrick (1994). Tense, temporal reference, and tense logic. Journal of Semantics, 11, 83–101.Find this resource:

Błaszczak, Joanna and Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota (2012). Futures in Polish and Slovenian from the perspective of a force-dynamic model. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16, pp. 85–98. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Boas, Hans (2000). Resultative Constructions in English and German. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Find this resource:

Boas, Hans (2003). A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Bobaljik, Jonathan (2012). Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Bochnak, M. Ryan (2010). Quantity and gradability across categories. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20 (ed. N. Li and D. Lutz), pp. 251–68. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Bochnak, M. Ryan (2013a). Cross-linguistic Variation in the Semantics of Comparatives. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.Find this resource:

Bochnak, M. Ryan (2013b). Two sources of scalarity within the verb phrase. In Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates (ed. B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, and R. Marín), pp. 99–123. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Bogatyvera, Lidia (2014). Russian Instrumental Nominals: A Contrastive Analysis with Catalan. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Find this resource:

(p. 645) Bohnemeyer, Jürgen (2007). Morpholexical transparency and the argument structure of verbs of cutting and breaking. Cognitive linguistics, 18, 153–77.Find this resource:

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen and Swift, Mary (2004). Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 263–96.Find this resource:

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen and Swift, Mary (2006). Force dynamics and the progressive. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Albuquerque, NM.Find this resource:

Bolinger, Dwight (1972). Degree Words. Mouton, The Hague.Find this resource:

Bonomi, Andrea (1997). The progressive and the structure of events. Journal of Semantics, 14, 173–205.Find this resource:

Bordes, Antoine, Usunier, Nicolas, Garcia-Duran, Alberto, Weston, Jason, and Yakhnenko, Oksana (2013). Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, pp. 2787–95.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (1984). Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Foris, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (1994). The projection of arguments. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: Functional Projections (ed. E. Benedicto and J. Runner), pp. 19–47. GLSA, Amherst, MA.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (2005a). Structuring Sense. Volume I: In Name Only. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (2005b). Structuring Sense. Volume II: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (2009). Roots and categories. Handout of keynote address to the Circle of Generative Grammar, University of the Basque Country, April 2009.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (2013a). Structuring Sense. Volume III: Taking Form. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (2013b). The syntactic domain of content. In Generative Linguistics and Acquisition: Studies in Honor of Nina M. Hyams (ed. M. Becker, J. Grinstead, and J. Rothman), pp. 205–48. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Borik, Olga (2006). Aspect and Reference Time. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Borik, Olga and Gehrke, Berit (2015). An introduction to the syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. In The Syntax and Semantics of Pseudo-Incorporation (ed. O. Borik and B. Gehrke), pp. 1–43. Brill, Leiden.Find this resource:

Bott, Oliver (2010). The Processing of Events. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Bowerman, Melissa and Choi, Soonja (2001). Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development (ed. M. Bowerman and S. Levinson), pp. 475–511. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Bowers, John (1993). The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 591–656.Find this resource:

Bowers, John (1997). A binary analysis of resultatives. Texas Linguistic Forum, 38, 43–58.Find this resource:

Bowers, John (2010). Arguments as Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Bowler, Margit (2016). The status of degrees in Warlpiri. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Brasoveanu, Adrian (2010). Modified numerals as post-suppositions. In Logic, Language and Meaning: 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, December 2009, Revised Selected Papers (ed. M. Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. de Jager, and K. Schulz), pp. 203–12. Springer, Berlin.Find this resource:

(p. 646) Bresnan, Joan (1973). Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 275–343.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (1982). The passive in lexical theory. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (ed. J. Bresnan), pp. 3–86. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan and Kanerva, Jonni (1989). Locative inversion in Chicheŵa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 1–50.Find this resource:

Brinton, Laurel and Traugott, Elizabeth (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Broccias, Cristiano (2004). Adjective selection in resultative sentences. In Lingua inglese e mediazione interlinguistica (ed. C. Torsello Taylor, M. G. Busà, and S. Gesuato), pp. 241–60. Unipress, Padova.Find this resource:

Brody, Michael (2000). Mirror theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 29–56.Find this resource:

Broekhuis, Hans and Verkuyl, Henk J. (2014). Binary tense and modality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32, 1–34.Find this resource:

Bruening, Benjamin (2014). Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32, 363–422.Find this resource:

Bücking, Sebastian (2012). Müdigkeit und Müde-Sein: Zur Semantik adjektivbasierter Zustands- nominalisierungen. Linguistische Berichte, 232, 361–97.Find this resource:

Bücking, Sebastian (2014). Elaborating on events by English by and German indem. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 10 (ed. C. Piñón), pp. 1–18.Find this resource:

Bücking, Sebastian and Buscher, Frauke (2014). Stative locative alternations as type coercion. In Proceedings of WCCFL 32 (ed. U. Steindl, T. Borer, H. Fang, A. García Pardo, P. Guekguezian, B. Hsu, C. O’Hara, and I. C. Ouyang), pp. 92–102. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.Find this resource:

Builles, Jean-Michel (1998). Le système “verbal” de la variété Merina de Malgache. In Systèmes verbaux (ed. F. Bentolila), pp. 213–51. Peeters, Louvain-la-Neuve.Find this resource:

Bunt, Harry (1981). The Formal Semantics of Mass Terms. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Burnett, Heather (2012). The Grammar of Tolerance: On Vagueness, Context-Sensitivity and the Origin of Scale Structure. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Bye, Patrik and Svenonius, Peter (2011). Exponence, phonology and non-concatenative morphology. Ms., University of Tromsø.Find this resource:

Cadierno, Teresa (2004). Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In Studies on Language Acquisition: Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching (ed. M. Achard and S. Niemeier), pp. 13–49. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Caha, Pavel (2009). The Nanosyntax of Case. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tromsø.Find this resource:

Campbell, Keith (1990). Abstract Particulars. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

Caponigro, Ivano (2003). Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-words Cross-linguistically. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg (1977a). Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg (1977b). A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 413–56.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg (1984). Thematic roles and their role in semantic interpretation. Linguistics, 22, 259–79.Find this resource:

(p. 647) Carlson, Greg (1998). Thematic roles and the individuation of events. In Events and Grammar (ed. S. Rothstein), pp. 35–51. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg (2003). Weak indefinites. In From NP to DP (ed. M. Coene and Y. d’Hulst), pp. 195–210. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg (2009). Generics and concepts. In Kinds, Things, and Stuff: Mass Terms and Generics (ed. F. J. Pelletier), pp. 16–35. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg and Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (1995). The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg and Sussman, Rachel (2005). Seemingly indefinite definites. In Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives (ed. S. Kepser and M. Reis), pp. 71–85. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg, Sussman, Rachel, Klein, Natalie, and Tanenhaus, Michael (2006). Weak definite noun phrases. In Proceedings of NELS 36 (ed. C. Davis, A. R. Deal, and Y. Zabbal), pp. 179–96. GLSA, Amherst, MA.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg, Klein, Natalie, Gegg-Harrison, Whitney, and Tanenhaus, Michael (2014). Weak definites as a form of definiteness: Experimental investigations. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 42, 11–32.Find this resource:

Carnap, Rudolf (1952). Meaning postulates. Philosophical Studies, 3, 65–73. Reprinted as pp. 222–9 of Carnap, Rudolf (1956) Meaning and Necessity (2nd edn). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Carrier, Jill and Randall, Janet (1992). The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 173–234.Find this resource:

Carrier, Jill and Randall, Janet (1993). Lexical mapping. In Knowledge and Language, Volume II: Lexical and Conceptual Structure (ed. E. Reuland and W. Abraham), pp. 119–42. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Carter, Richard (1988). On Linking: Papers by Richard Carter. Lexicon Project Working Papers 25 (ed. B. Levin and C. Tenny). Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Cartwright, Nancy (2004). Causation: One word, many things. Philosophy of Science, 71, 805–20.Find this resource:

Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1967). Comments. In The Logic of Decision and Action (ed. N. Rescher), pp. 104–112. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.Find this resource:

Celle, Agnès (2005). Constructions résultatives et identification du résultat. Cycnos, 21:1. http://revel.unice.fr/cycnos/index.html?id=12 (accessed 27 August 2018).Find this resource:

Chambers, Nathanael, Cassidy, Taylor, McDowell, Bill, and Bethard, Steven (2014). Dense event ordering with a multi-pass architecture. Transactions of the Association of Computational Linguistics, 2, 273–84.Find this resource:

Champollion, Lucas (2010). Cumulative readings of every do not provide evidence for events and thematic roles. In Logic, Language and Meaning: 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, December 2009, Revised Selected Papers (ed. M. Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. de Jager, and K. Schulz), pp. 213–22. Springer, Berlin.Find this resource:

Champollion, Lucas (2014). The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38, 31–66.Find this resource:

Chen, Danqi and Manning, Christopher (2014). A fast and accurate dependency parser using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 740–50.Find this resource:

Chen, Liang and Guo, Jiansheng (2009). Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1749–66.Find this resource:

(p. 648) Chierchia, Gennaro (1984). Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published (1988) by Garland Press, New York.Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro (1995). Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In The Generic Book (ed. G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier), pp. 176–223. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro (2004). A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax–Lexicon Interface (ed. A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, and M. Everaert), pp. 22–59. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro and McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1990). Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Chilton, Paul (2014). Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1955). The logical structure of linguistic theory. Ms., Harvard University. Published (1975) by University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar (ed. R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum), pp. 184–221. Ginn, Waltham, MA.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Praeger, New York.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (ed. K. Hale and S. J. Keyser), pp. 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2008). On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (ed. C. Otero, R. Freidin, and M.-L. Zubizarreta), pp. 133–66. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2010). Restricting stipulations: Consequences and challenges. Talk given at Universität Stuttgart.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49.Find this resource:

Christiansen, Morten, Conway, Christopher, and Onnis, Luca (2011). Similar neural correlates for language and sequential learning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 231–56.Find this resource:

Chung, Sandra and Ladusaw, William (2003). Restriction and Saturation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Church, Kenneth and Hanks, Patrick (1989). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 76–83. ACL.Find this resource:

Chwilla, Dorothee and Kolk, Herman (2005). Accessing world knowledge: Evidence from N400 and reaction time priming. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 589–606.Find this resource:

Cieschinger, Maria and Bosch, Peter (2011). Seemingly weak definites: German preposition–determiner contractions. Paper presented at the Sinn und Bedeutung satellite workshop on Weak Referentiality, Universiteit Utrecht University, September 2011.Find this resource:

(p. 649) Cifuentes Férez, Paula (2007). Human locomotion verbs in English and Spanish. International Journal of English Studies, 7, 117–36.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve and Clark, Herbert (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55, 767–811.Find this resource:

Clerget, Emeline, Winderickx, Aline, Fadiga, Luciano, and Olivier, Etienne (2009). Role of Broca’s area in encoding sequential human actions: A virtual lesion study. NeuroReport, 20, 1496–99.Find this resource:

Cohen, Ariel (2001). On the generic use of indefinite singulars. Journal of Semantics, 18, 183–209.Find this resource:

Cohn, Neil (2013a). The Visual Language of Comics: Introduction to the Structure and Cognition of Sequential Images. Bloomsbury, London.Find this resource:

Cohn, Neil (2013b). Visual narrative structure. Cognitive Science, 37, 413–52.Find this resource:

Cohn, Neil and Maher, Stephen (2015). The notion of the motion: The neurocognition of motion lines in visual narratives. Brain Research, 1601, 73–84.Find this resource:

Cohn, Neil and Paczynski, Martin (2013). Prediction, events, and the advantage of Agents: The processing of semantic roles in visual narrative. Cognitive Psychology, 67, 73–97.Find this resource:

Cohn, Neil, Paczynski, Martin, Jackendoff, Ray, Holcomb, Phillip, and Kuperberg, Gina (2012). (Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: Structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 1–38.Find this resource:

Cohn, Neil, Jackendoff, Ray, Holcomb, Phillip, and Kuperberg, Gina (2014). The grammar of visual narrative: Neural evidence for constituent structure in sequential image comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 64, 63–70.Find this resource:

Comrie, Bernard (1976). Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Comrie, Bernard (1985). Causative verb formation and other verb-deriving morphology. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (ed. T. Shopen), pp. 309–48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Constantinescu, Camelia (2011). Gradability in the Nominal Domain. LOT Dissertation Series 288. LOT, Utrecht.Find this resource:

Coon, Jessica and Preminger, Omer (2017). Split ergativity is not about ergativity. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity (ed. J. Coon, D. Massam, and L. deM. Travis), pp. 226–52. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Copley, Bridget (2008). The plan’s the thing: Deconstructing futurate meanings. Linguistic Inquiry, 39, 261–74.Find this resource:

Copley, Bridget (2010). Towards a teleological model for modals. Paper presented at Paris working sessions on modality, goals, and events.Find this resource:

Copley, Bridget (2018). Dispositional causation. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3, article 137.Find this resource:

Copley, Bridget and Harley, Heidi (2014). Eliminating causative entailments with the force-theoretic framework: The case of the Tohono O’odham frustrative cem. In Causation in Grammatical Structures (ed. B. Copley and F. Martin), pp. 120–51. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Copley, Bridget and Harley, Heidi (2015). A force-theoretic framework for event structure. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38, 103–58.Find this resource:

Copley, Bridget and Harley, Heidi (2018). What would it take to tame the verbal hydra? Ms., CNRS/Paris 8 and University of Arizona.Find this resource:

(p. 650) Copley, Bridget and Wolff, Phillip (2014). Theories of causation should inform linguistic theory and vice versa. In Causation in Grammatical Structures (ed. B. Copley and F. Martin), pp. 11–57. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Copley, Bridget, Wolff, Phillip, and Shepard, Jason (2015). Force interaction in the expression of causation. In Proceedings of SALT 25 (ed. S. D’Antonio, M. Moroney, and C. R. Little), pp. 433–51.Find this resource:

Corblin, Francis (2011). Des définis para-intensionnels: être à l’hôpital, aller à l’école. Langue française, 171, 55–77.Find this resource:

Cormack, Annabel and Smith, Neil (1999). Why are depictives different from resultatives? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 251–84.Find this resource:

Coventry, Kenny and Garrod, Simon (2004). Saying, Seeing and Acting: The Psychological Semantics of Spatial Prepositions. Psychology Press, Hove.Find this resource:

Cresswell, Max (1973). Logics and Languages. Methuen, London.Find this resource:

Cresswell, Max (1976). The semantics of degree. In Montague Grammar (ed. B. Partee), pp. 261–92. Academic Press, New York.Find this resource:

Cresswell, Max (1985). Adverbial Modification: Interval Semantics and its Rivals. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Croft, William (1990). Possible verbs and the structure of events. In Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization (ed. S. Tsohatzidis), pp. 48–73. Routledge, London.Find this resource:

Croft, William (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Croft, William (1993). Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. In Semantics and the Lexicon (ed. J. Pustejovsky), pp. 55–72. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Croft, William (1998). Event structure in argument linking. In The Projection of Arguments (ed. M. Butt and W. Geuder). CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Croft, William (2012). Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Croft, William (2015). Force dynamics and directed change in event lexicalization and argument realization. In Cognitive Science Perspectives on Verb Representation and Processing (ed. R. de Almeida and C. Manouilidou), pp. 103–29. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Croft, William, Taoka, Chiaki, and Wood, Esther (2001). Argument linking and the commercial transaction frame in English, Russian, and Japanese. Language Sciences, 23, 579–602.Find this resource:

Croft, William, Barðdal, Jóhanna, Hollmann, Willem, Sotirova, Violeta, and Taoka, Chiaki (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In Contrastive Construction Grammar (ed. H. Boas), pp. 201–35. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Cruse, D. Alan (1973). Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics, 9, 11–23.Find this resource:

Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Cummins, Sarah (1996). Movement and direction in French and English. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 31–54.Find this resource:

Cummins, Sarah (1998). Le mouvement directionnel dans une perspective d’analyse monosémique. Langues et Linguistique, 24, 47–66.Find this resource:

Dahl, Östen (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems. Blackwell, London.Find this resource:

Davidson, Donald (1967). The logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decision and Action (ed. N. Rescher), pp. 81–95. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.Find this resource:

Davidson, Donald (1969). The individuation of events. In Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel (ed. N. Rescher), pp. 216–34. Reidel, Dordrecht. Reprinted as Ch.22 of Davidson (1980). Page numbers refer to this latter version.Find this resource:

(p. 651) Davies, Mark (2008–). Corpus of Contemporary American English. https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ (accessed 27 August 2018).Find this resource:

Davis, Anthony (2011). Thematic roles. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Volume 2 (ed. K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, and P. Portner), pp. 399–420. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Davis, Anthony and Koenig, Jean-Pierre (2000). Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language, 76, 56–91.Find this resource:

Davis, Henry, Matthewson, Lisa, and Rullmann, Hotze (2009). ‘Out-of-control’ marking as circumstantial modality in St’át’imcets. In Cross-linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect, and Modality (ed. L. Hodeweg, H. de Hoop, and A. Malchukov), pp. 205–44. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Dayal, Veneeta (2003). A semantics for pseudoincorporation. Ms., Rutgers University.Find this resource:

Dayal, Veneeta (2004). Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 393–450.Find this resource:

Dayal, Veneeta (2011). Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 123–67.Find this resource:

de Belder, Marijke and van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen (2015). How to merge a root. Linguistic Inquiry, 46, 625–55.Find this resource:

de Bruijn, Ellen, Schubotz, Ricarda, and Ullsperger, Markus (2007). An event-related potential study on the observation of erroneous everyday actions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 278–85.Find this resource:

de Swart, Henriëtte (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16, 347–85.Find this resource:

de Swart, Henriëtte (2012). Verbal aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (ed. R. Binnick), pp. 752–80. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

de Swart, Henriëtte and Molendijk, Arie (1999). Negation and the temporal structure of narrative discourse. Journal of Semantics, 16, 1–42.Find this resource:

Deacon, Diana, Grose-Fifer, Jill, Yang, Chien-Ming, Stanick, Virginia, Hewitt, Sean, and Dynowska, Anna (2004). Evidence for a new conceptualization of semantic representation in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Cortex, 40, 467–78.Find this resource:

Déchaine, Rose-Marie (1993). Predicates across Categories: Towards a Category-neutral Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Declerck, Renaat (1979). Aspect and the bounded/unbounded (telic/atelic) distinction. Linguistics, 17, 761–94.Find this resource:

DeLancey, Scott (2003). Location and direction in Klamath. In Motion, Direction and Location in Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (ed. E. Shay and U. Seibert), pp. 59–90. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Dell, François (1983). An aspectual distinction in Tagalog. Oceanic Linguistics, 22/23, 175–206.Find this resource:

DeLong, Katherine, Urbach, Thomas, and Kutas, Marta (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–21.Find this resource:

DeLong, Katherine, Troyer, Melissa, and Kutas, Marta (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 631–45.Find this resource:

Demonte, Violeta (1986). Predication and passive. In Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax (ed. I. Bordelois, H. Contreras, and K. Zagona), pp. 51–66. Foris, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Demonte, Violeta (1987). C-command, prepositions, and predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 147–57.Find this resource:

(p. 652) den Dikken, Marcel and Hoekstra, Eric (1994). No cause for a small clause? (Non-)arguments for the structure of resultatives. Groninger Arbeiter zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 37, 89–105.Find this resource:

Deo, Ashwini, Francez, Itamar, and Koontz-Garboden, Andrew (2013). From change to value difference in degree achievements. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 23 (ed. T. Snider), pp. 97–115.Find this resource:

Depraetere, Ilse (1995). On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 1–19.Find this resource:

Depraetere, Ilse and Reed, Susan (2000). The present perfect progressive: Constraints on its use with numerical object NPs. English Language and Linguistics, 4, 95–114.Find this resource:

Déprez, Viviane (2005). Morphological number, semantic number and bare nouns. Lingua, 115, 857–883.Find this resource:

Dez, Jacques (1980). La syntaxe du Malgache. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lille.Find this resource:

Diesing, Molly (1992). Indefinites. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Dik, Simon (1997). The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Dimitriadis, Alexis (2004). Discontinuous reciprocals. Ms., Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.Find this resource:

Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila (1996). Verb Semantics, Diathesis and Aspect. Ph.D. thesis, NTNU, Trondheim.Find this resource:

Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila (2012). Voice. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (ed. R. Binnick), pp. 937–59. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Dobler, Eva, Newell, Heather, Piggott, Glyne, Skinner, Tobin, Sugimura, Mina, and Travis, Lisa deMena (in press). Narrow syntactic movement after spell-out. in Balazs Suranyi (ed.), Minimalist Approaches to Syntactic Locality, Springer Publishers, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, Bleam, Tonia, and Espinal, M. Teresa (2006). Bare nouns, number and types of incorporation. In Non-Definiteness and Plurality (ed. L. Tasmowski and S. Vogeleer), pp. 51–79. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Dol, Philomena (2007). A Grammar of Maybrat: A Language of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, Papua Province, Indonesia. Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University, Canberra.Find this resource:

Dölling, Johannes (1999). Kopulasätze als Zustandsbeschreibungen. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 14, 95–122.Find this resource:

Dölling, Johannes (2005). Copula sentences and entailment relations. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 317–29.Find this resource:

Dölling, Johannes (2014). Aspectual coercion and eventuality structure. In Events, Arguments, and Aspects. Topics in the Semantics of Verbs (ed. K. Robering), pp. 189–226. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Doron, Edit (2003). Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics, 11, 1–67.Find this resource:

Doron, Edit (2005). The aspect of agency. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation (ed. N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport), pp. 154–73. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Dorr, Bonnie, Passonneau, Rebecca, Farwell, David, Green, Rebecca, Habash, Nizar, Helmreich, Stephen, Hovy, Edward, Levin, Lori, Miller, Keith, Mitamura, Teruko, Rambow, Owen, and Siddharthan, Advaith (2010). Interlingual annotation of parallel text corpora: A new framework for annotation and evaluation. Natural Language Engineering, 16, 197–243.Find this resource:

Dotlačil, Jakub (2010). Anaphora and Distributivity: A Study of same, different, reciprocals and others. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Utrecht.Find this resource:

Dowe, Phil (2000). Physical Causation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

(p. 653) Dowty, David (1977). Towards a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English ‘imperfective’ progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 45–77.Find this resource:

Dowty, David (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Reidel, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Dowty, David (1982). Grammatical relations and Montague Grammar. In The Nature of Syntactic Representation (ed. P. Jacobson and G. Pullum), pp. 79–130. Reidel, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Dowty, David (1989). On the semantic content of the notion of ‘thematic role’. In Properties, Types and Meanings. Volume II: Semantic Issues (ed. G. Chierchia, B. Partee, and R. Turner), pp. 69–130. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Dowty, David (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619.Find this resource:

Dowty, David (2000). The dual analysis of adjuncts/complements in categorial grammar. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 17, 53–78.Find this resource:

Dubinsky, Stan (1994). Predicate union and the syntax of Japanese causatives. Journal of Linguistics, 30, 43–79.Find this resource:

Dummett, Michael (1973). Frege: Philosophy of Language. Duckworth, London.Find this resource:

Dyer, Chris, Ballesteros, Miguel, Ling, Wang, Matthews, Austin, and Smith, Noah (2015). Transition-based dependency parsing with stack long short-term memory. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Beijing, pp. 334–43.Find this resource:

Dyer, Chris, Kuncoro, Adhiguna, Ballesteros, Miguel, and Smith, Noah (2016). Recurrent neural network grammars. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, San Diego, CA, pp. 199–209. ACL.Find this resource:

Eckardt, Regine (1998). Adverbs, Events and Other Things: Issues in the Semantics of Manner Adverbs. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Eckardt, Regine (2000). Causation, contexts, and event individuation. In Speaking of Events (ed. J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. Varzi), pp. 105–21. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Eckardt, Regine (2002). Event semantics. In Semantics (ed. F. Hamm and T. E. Zimmermann), pp. 91–128. Buske, Hamburg.Find this resource:

Eckardt, Regine (2010). A logic for easy linking semantics. In Logic, Language and Meaning: 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 16–18, 2009, Revised Selected Papers (ed. M. Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. de Jager, and K. Schulz), pp. 274–83. Springer, Berlin.Find this resource:

Ellis, Willis (1938). A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., London.Find this resource:

Embick, David (2004). On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 355–92.Find this resource:

Embick, David (2009). Roots, states, and stative passives. Handout, Roots Workshop, Universität Stuttgart.Find this resource:

Embick, David (2010). Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Embick, David and Noyer, Rolf (2007). Distributed Morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces (ed. G. Ramchand and C. Reiss), pp. 289–324. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Enç, Murvet (1986). Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 1–44.Find this resource:

Engelberg, Stefan (2000). Verben, Ereignisse und das Lexikon. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Engelberg, Stefan (2005). Stativity, supervenience, and sentential subjects. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications (ed. C. Maienborn and A. Wöllstein), pp. 45–68. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

(p. 654) Epstein, Samuel David (2009). The unification of theta relations: How TRANSFER renders SpecvP a theta marked complement. Ms., University of Michigan.Find this resource:

Epstein, Samuel David, Kitahara, Hisatsuguta, and Seely, T. Daniel (2012). Structure building that can’t be. In Ways of Structure Building (ed. M. Uribe-Etxebarria and V. Valmala), pp. 253–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Ericsson, Eva, Olofsson, Jonas, Nordin, Steven, Rudolfsson, Thomas, and Sandström, Görel (2008). Is the P600/SPS affected by the richness of semantic content? A linguistic ERP study in Swedish. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 1–9.Find this resource:

Ernst, Thomas (2002). The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and Rapoport, Tova (1997). A theory of verbal projection. In Interfaces in Linguistic Theory—Selected Papers from the International Conference on Interfaces in Linguistics (ed. G. Matos, M. Miguel, I. Duarte, and I. Hub Faria), pp. 129–48. APL/Edições Colibri, Lisboa.Find this resource:

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and Rapoport, Tova (2004). Bare aspect: A theory of syntactic projection. In The Syntax of Time (ed. J. Guéron and J. Lecarme), pp. 217–34. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and Rapoport, Tova (2005). Path predicates. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation (ed. N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport), pp. 65–86. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and Rapoport, Tova (2010). Contacts and other results. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure (ed. M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, and I. Sichel), pp. 59–75. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Erwin, Sean (1996). Quantity and moras: An amicable separation. In The Structure of Malagasy: Volume 1 (ed. M. Pearson and I. Paul), pp. 2–30. Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Escandell-Vidal, Victoria and Leonetti, Manuel (2002). Coercion and the stage/individual distinction. In From Words to Discourse (ed. J. Gutiérrez-Rexach), pp. 159–79. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Espinal, Maria Teresa (2010). Bare nominals in Catalan and Spanish: Their structure and meaning. Lingua, 120, 984–1009.Find this resource:

Espinal, Maria Teresa and McNally, Louise (2011). Bare singular nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Linguistics, 47, 87–128.Find this resource:

Etzioni, Oren, Banko, Michele, and Cafarella, Michael (2007). Machine reading. In Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Reading, Menlo Park, CA. AAAI Press.Find this resource:

Everaert, Martin, Marelj, Marijana, and Siloni, Tal (2012). The theta system: An introduction. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface (ed. M. Everaert, M. Marelj, and T. Siloni), pp. 1–19. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Fábregas, Antonio (2007). The exhaustive lexicalization principle. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics, 34, 165–99.Find this resource:

Fábregas, Antonio (2012). A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, problems and proposals. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 1–71.Find this resource:

Fábregas, Antonio and Marín, Rafael (2012). State nouns are Kimian states. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Leiden 2010 (ed. I. Franco, S. Lusini, and A. Saab), pp. 41–64. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Fábregas, Antonio and Marín, Rafael (2013). Differentiating eventivity from dynamicity: The Aktionsart of Davidsonian state verbs. Paper presented at the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Manuscript available at https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WM2NzQ5N/FabregasMarin_2013_LSRL.pdf (accessed 27 August 2018).Find this resource:

(p. 655) Fabricius-Hansen, Catherine (2001). Wi(e)der and again(st). In Auditur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow (ed. C. Féry and W. Sternefeld), pp. 101–30. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.Find this resource:

Fadlon, Julie (2014). The Psycholinguistics of Verbal Diathesis: The Transitive–Unaccusative Alternation. Ph.D. thesis, Tel Aviv University.Find this resource:

Faller, Martina (2000). Dimensional adjectives and measure phrases in vector space semantics. In Formalizing the Dynamics of Information (ed. M. Faller, S. Kaufmann, and M. Pauly), pp. 151–70. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Farkas, Donka and de Swart, Henriëtte (2003). The Semantics of Incorporation: From Argument Structure to Discourse Transparency. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Farkas, Donka and Sugioka, Yoko (1983). Restrictive if/when clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 225–58.Find this resource:

Fazio, Patrik, Cantagallo, Anna, Craighero, Laila, D’Ausilio, Alessandro, Roy, Alice, Pozzo, Thierry, Calzolari, Ferdinando, Granieri, Enrico, and Fadiga, Luciano (2009). Encoding of human action in Broca’s area. Brain, 132, 1980–8.Find this resource:

Federmeier, Kara and Kutas, Marta (1999a). Right words and left words: Electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 373–92.Find this resource:

Federmeier, Kara and Kutas, Marta (1999b). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469–95.Find this resource:

Feist, Michele (2010). Motion through syntactic frames. Cognition, 115, 192–6.Find this resource:

Feiz, Parastou (2011). Traveling through space in Persian and English: A comparative analysis of motion events in elicited narratives. Language Sciences, 33, 401–16.Find this resource:

Fellbaum, Christiane (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Fern, Alan, Siskind, Jeffrey Mark, and Givan, Robert (2002). Learning temporal, relational, force-dynamic event definitions from video. In AAAI-02 Proceedings, pp. 159–66.Find this resource:

Fernald, Theodore (2000). Predicates and Temporal Arguments. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Fernando, Tim (2015). The semantics of tense and aspect. In Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (2nd edn) (ed. S. Lappin and C. Fox), pp. 203–36. Wiley, Chichester.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Marcelo (2005). Event Quantification and Plurality. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Ferretti, Todd, Kutas, Marta, and McRae, Ken (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 182–96.Find this resource:

Fikes, Richard and Nilsson, Nils (1971). STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 2, 189–208.Find this resource:

Filip, Hana (1999). Aspect, Eventuality Types and Nominal Reference. Routledge, Taylor & Francis, New York.Find this resource:

Filip, Hana (2008). Events and maximalization. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect (ed. S. Rothstein), pp. 217–56. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Filip, Hana (2011). Aspectual class and Aktionsart. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Volume 2 (ed. K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, and P. Portner), pp. 1186–1217. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Filip, Hana (2012). Lexical aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (ed. R. Binnick), pp. 721–51. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Filipović, Luna (2007). Talking about Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

(p. 656) Fillmore, Charles (1968). The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory (ed. E. Bach and R. Harms), pp. 1–88. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles (1969). Types of lexical information. In Studies in Syntax and Semantics (ed. F. Kiefer), pp. 109–37. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1, pp. 123–31.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 20–32.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles (1977). The case for case reopened. In Syntax and Semantics 8 (ed. P. Cole and J. Sadock), pp. 59–82. Academic Press, New York.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles and Baker, Collin (2015). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog), pp. 721–816. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Fine, Kit (2012). Counterfactuals without possible worlds. Journal of Philosophy, 109, 221–46.Find this resource:

Fine, Kit (2014). Truth-maker semantics for intuitionistic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 43, 549–77.Find this resource:

Fine, Kit (2017). Truthmaker semantics. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Language (2nd edn) (ed. B. Hale, C. Wright, and A. Miller), pp. 556–77. Wiley, Chichester.Find this resource:

Finkbeiner, Matthew, Nicol, Janet, Greth, Delia, and Nakamura, Kumiko (2002). The role of language in memory for actions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 447–57.Find this resource:

Fitting, Melvin (1969). Intuitionistic Logic. North Holland, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Fleischhauer, Jens (2013). Interaction of telicity and degree gradation in change of state verbs. In Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates (ed. B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, and R. Marín), pp. 125–52. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet Dean (1977). Semantics: Theories of Meaning in Generative Grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry (1970). Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die”. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 429–38.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry (1975). The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry and Bever, Thomas (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 414–20.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernie (1997). Morphemes matter; the continuing case against lexical decomposition (or: Please don’t play that again, Sam). Ms., Rutgers University.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernie (1998). The emptiness of the lexicon: Reflections on James Pustejovksy’s “The Generative Lexicon”. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 269–88.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet Dean, Fodor, Jerry, and Garrett, Merrill (1975). The psychological unreality of semantic representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 6, 515–31.Find this resource:

Folli, Raffaella (2002). Resultatives: Small clauses or complex VPs? In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000 (ed. C. Beyssade, R. Bok-Bennema, F. Drijkoningen, and P. Monachesi), pp. 153–70. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Folli, Raffaella and Harley, Heidi (2005). Flavors of v. In Aspectual Inquiries (ed. P. Kempchisky and R. Slabakova), pp. 95–120. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Folli, Raffaella and Harley, Heidi (2006). On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: Waltzing Matilda all over. Studia Linguistica, 60, 121–55.Find this resource:

Folli, Raffaella and Harley, Heidi (2007). Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 197–238.Find this resource:

Folli, Raffaella and Harley, Heidi (2008). Teleology and animacy in external arguments. Lingua, 118, 190–202.Find this resource:

(p. 657) Folli, Raffaella and Harley, Heidi (2015). A syntactic alternative to deficiency approaches to the manner-alternation parameter. Ms., University of Ulster and University of Arizona.Find this resource:

Folli, Raffaella and Ramchand, Gillian (2005). Prepositions and results in Italian and English: An analysis from event decomposition. In Perspectives on Aspect (ed. H. Verkuyl, H. de Swart, and A. van Hout), pp. 81–105. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Fox, Danny (1995). Economy and scope. Natural Language Semantics, 3, 283–341.Find this resource:

Fox, Danny (2000). Economy and Semantic Interpretation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Francez, Itamar and Koontz-Garboden, Andrew (2015). Semantic variation and the grammar of property concepts. Language, 91, 533–63.Find this resource:

Frege, Gottlob (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Wilhelm Koebner, Breslau. Translated by J. L. Austin as The Foundations of Arithmetic. Blackwell, 1950.Find this resource:

Frege, Gottlob (1948). Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review, 57, 209–30.Find this resource:

Freud, Sigmund (1925). Negation. In The Ego and the Id, and Other Works (ed. J. Strachey), pp. 235–9. Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, London. Standard ed., vol. IX.Find this resource:

Friederici, Angela (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78–84.Find this resource:

Friederici, Angela, Pfeifer, Erdmut, and Hahne, Anja (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183–92.Find this resource:

Fujimori, Atsushi (2005). Japanese morphemic vowels and telicity: Mono-syllabic verb cases. In Proceedings of the 2005 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference (ed. C. Gurski).Find this resource:

Fults, Scott Walter (2006). The Structure of Comparison: An Investigation of Gradable Adjectives. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.Find this resource:

Galton, Anthony (1990). A critical examination of Allen’s theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 159–88.Find this resource:

Ganis, Giorgio, Kutas, Marta, and Sereno, Martin (1996). The search for “common sense”: An electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 89–106.Find this resource:

Gärdenfors, Peter (2014). The Geometry of Meaning: Semantics based on Conceptual Spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Garey, Howard (1957). Verbal aspect in French. Language, 33, 99–110.Find this resource:

Garrod, Simon, Ferrier, Gillian, and Campbell, Siobhan (1999). In and on: Investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition, 72, 167–89.Find this resource:

Gawron, Jean Mark (2005). Generalized paths. In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory XV (ed. E. Georgala and J. Howell). CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Gawron, Jean Marc (2009). The lexical semantics of extent verbs. Ms., San Diego State University.Find this resource:

Gehrke, Berit (2008). Ps in Motion: On the Semantics and Syntax of P Elements and Motion Events. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Utrecht. LOT Dissertation Series 184. LOT, Utrecht.Find this resource:

Gehrke, Berit (2011). Stative passives and event kinds. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15 (ed. I. Reich, E. Horch, and D. Pauly), pp. 241–57. Universaar, Saarbrücken.Find this resource:

Gehrke, Berit (2012). Passive states. In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure (ed. V. Demonte and L. McNally), pp. 185–211. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Gehrke, Berit (2013). Still puzzled by adjectival passives? In Syntax and Its Limits (ed. R. Folli, C. Sevdali, and R. Truswell), pp. 175–91. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Gehrke, Berit (2015a). Adjectival participles, event kind modification and pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 33, 897–938.Find this resource:

(p. 658) Gehrke, Berit (2015b). Manner adverbs and between- vs. within-event comparison. Paper presented at the 16th Workshop on the Roots of Pragmasemantics, Szklarska Poreba, 20–23 February, 2015.Find this resource:

Gehrke, Berit and Lekakou, Marika (2013). How to miss your preposition. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 33, 92–106.Find this resource:

Gehrke, Berit and Marco, Cristina (2014). Different by-phrases with adjectival passives: Evidence from Spanish corpus data. Lingua, 149B, 188–214.Find this resource:

Gehrke, Berit and McNally, Louise (2011). Frequency adjectives and assertions about event types. In Proceedings of SALT 19 (ed. E. Cormany, S. Ito, and D. Lutz), pp. 180–97. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Gehrke, Berit and McNally, Louise (2015). Distributional modification: The case of frequency adjectives. Language, 91, 837–70.Find this resource:

Geist, Ljudmila (2006). Die Kopula und ihre Komplemente. Zur Kompositionalität in Kopulasätzen. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Gennari, Silvia, Sloman, Steven, Malt, Barbar, and Fitch, William Tecumseh (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79.Find this resource:

Gese, Helga (2011). Events in adjectival passives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15 (ed. I. Reich, E. Horch, and D. Pauly), pp. 259–73. Universaar, Saarbrücken.Find this resource:

Geuder, Wilhelm (2000). Oriented Adverbs: Issues in the Lexical Semantics of Event Adverbs. Ph.D. thesis, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen.Find this resource:

Geuder, Wilhelm (2006). Manner modification of states. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10 (ed. C. Ebert and C. Endriss), pp. 111–24. ZAS, Berlin.Find this resource:

Geurts, Bart (1999). Presuppositions and Pronouns. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Geurts, Bart and van der Sandt, Rob (2004). Interpreting focus. Theoretical Linguistics, 30, 1–44.Find this resource:

Geurts, Bart, Beaver, David, and Maier, Emar (2015). Discourse Representation Theory. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. E. Zalta). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Find this resource:

Giannakidou, Anastasia (2003). A puzzle about until and the present perfect. In Perfect Explorations (ed. A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert, and A. von Stechow), pp. 101–133. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Giannakidou, Anastasia and Staraki, Eleni (2013). Ability, action, and causation: From pure ability to force. In Genericity (ed. A. Mari, C. Beyssade, and F. Del Prete), pp. 250–75. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Giglio, Ana Carolina, Minati, Ludovico, and Boggio, Paulo (2013). Throwing the banana away and keeping the peel: Neuroelectric responses to unexpected but physically feasible action endings. Brain Research, 1532, 56–62.Find this resource:

Gilbert, Daniel and Wilson, Timothy (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317, 1351–4.Find this resource:

Ginzburg, Jonathan (2005). Situation semantics: The ontological balance sheet. Research on Language and Computation, 3, 363–89.Find this resource:

Gisborne, Nikolas (2010). The Event Structure of Perception Verbs. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Gisborne, Nikolas (2019). Ten Lectures on Events and the Language Network. Brill, Leiden.Find this resource:

Givón, Talmy (1984). Syntax: A Functional Typological Introduction, Volume 1. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Glanzberg, Michael (2011). Meaning, concepts, and the lexicon. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 31, 1–29.Find this resource:

(p. 659) Glasbey, Sheila (1997). I-level predicates that allow existential readings for bare plurals. In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VII (ed. A. Lawson), pp. 169–79. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2010). The natural semantic metalanguage approach. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (ed. B. Heine and H. Narrog), pp. 459–84. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Godfrey-Smith, Peter (2010). Causal pluralism. In Oxford Handbook of Causation (ed. H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, and P. Menzies), pp. 326–37. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele (1998). Semantic principles of predication. In Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (ed. J.-P. Koenig), pp. 41–54. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele (2005). Constructions at Work. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele (2010). Verbs, constructions, and semantic frames. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure (ed. M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, and I. Sichel), pp. 39–58. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Goldin-Meadow, Susan, So, Wing Chee, Özyürek, Aslı, and Mylander, Carol (2008). The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9163–8.Find this resource:

Goldschmidt, Anja and Zwarts, Joost (2016). Hitting the nail on the head: Force vectors in verb semantics. In Proceedings of SALT 26 (ed. M. Moroney, C. R. Little, J. Collard, and D. Burgdorf), pp. 433–50.Find this resource:

González, Paz and Verkuyl, Henk J. (2017). A binary approach to Spanish tense and aspect: On the tense battle about the past. Borealis, 6, 97–138.Find this resource:

González Fernández, María Jesús (1997). Sobre la motivación semántica del las expresiones pleonásticas de movimiento: subir arriba, bajar abajo, entrar adentro y salir afuera. In Cambios diacrónicos en el español (ed. C. Company Company), pp. 123–41. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico.Find this resource:

Goschler, Juliana and Stefanowitsch, Anatol (2013a). Introduction: Beyond typology: The encoding of motion events across time and varieties. In Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events (ed. J. Goschler and A. Stefanowitsch), pp. 1–14. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Goschler, Juliana and Stefanowitsch, Anatol (2013b). Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Green, Georgia (1973). A syntactic syncretism in English and French. In Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée Kahane (ed. B. Kachru, R. Lees, Y. Malkiel, A. Pietrangeli, and S. Saporta), pp. 257–78. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.Find this resource:

Green, Georgia (1974). Semantics and Syntactic Regularity. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Yael (2002). Two types of quantificational modalized genericity and the interpetation of bare plurals and indefinite singular NPs. In Proceedings of SALT 12 (ed. B. Jackson), pp. 104–23. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Grefenstette, Edward and Sadrzadeh, Mehrnoosh (2011). Experimental support for a categorical compositional distributional model of meaning. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Edinburgh, pp. 1394–1404. ACL.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, Jane (1990). Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, Jane (2011). Deverbal nominalizations. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Volume 2 (ed. K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, and P. Portner), pp. 1292–1313. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

(p. 660) Groenendijk, Jeroen and Stokhof, Martin (1991). Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 39–100.Find this resource:

Grône, Maryse (2014). Les résultatives de l’anglais: Une étude de leur syntaxe et de leur productivité à l’aune de la sémantique lexicale et de la pragmatique. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Diderot—Paris 7.Find this resource:

Grønn, Atle (2004). The Semantics and Pragmatics of the Russian Factual Imperfective. Ph.D. thesis, Universitetet i Oslo.Find this resource:

Grose-Fifer, Jill and Deacon, Diana (2004). Priming by natural category membership in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1948–60.Find this resource:

Grove, Julian (2013). The lexical semantics of much: Conversion from intervals to degrees. In NELS 44: Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, GLSA, Amherst, MA.Find this resource:

Gruber, Jeffrey (1965). Studies in Lexical Relations. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Published as Gruber (1976).Find this resource:

Gruber, Jeffrey (1976). Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. North Holland, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Grycner, Adam and Weikum, Gerhard (2014). HARPY: Hypernyms and alignment of relational paraphrases. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, Dublin, pp. 2195–2204. ACL.Find this resource:

Grycner, Adam, Weikum, Gerhard, Pujara, Jay, Foulds, James, and Getoor, Lise (2015). RELLY: Inferring hypernym relationships between relational phrases. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, pp. 971–81. ACL.Find this resource:

Guéron, Jacqueline (1987). Clause union and the verb–particle construction in English. In North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting (NELS) 17 (ed. J. McDonough and B. Plunkett).Find this resource:

Guilfoyle, Eithne (2000). Tense and N-features in Modern Irish. In The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages (ed. A. Carnie and E. Guilfoyle), pp. 61–73. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Güldemann, Tom (2005). Asyndetic subordination and deverbal depictive expressions in Shona. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification (ed. N. Himmelmann and E. Schultze-Berndt), pp. 323–53. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Gunter, Thomas, Friederici, Angela, and Schriefers, Herbert (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556–68.Find this resource:

Guu, Kelvin, Miller, John, and Liang, Percy (2015). Traversing knowledge graphs in vector space. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processsing, Lisbon, pp. 318–27. ACL.Find this resource:

Gvozdanovic, Jadranka (2012). Perfective and imperfective aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (ed. R. Binnick), pp. 781–802. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Hackl, Martin (2000). Comparative Quantifiers. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Hagoort, Peter (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. NeuroImage, 20, S18–S29.Find this resource:

Hagoort, Peter, Brown, Colin, and Groothusen, Jolanda (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439–83.Find this resource:

Hahne, Anja and Jescheniak, Jörg (2001). What’s left if the jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processing during auditory sentence comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 199–212.Find this resource:

Hale, Bob (1987). Abstract Objects. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (ed. K. Hale and S. J. Keyser), pp. 53–109. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

(p. 661) Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay (1997a). The limits of argument structure. In Theoretical Issues at the Morphology–Syntax Interface (ed. A. Mendikoetxea and M. Uribe-Etxebarria), pp. 203–30. Euskal Herriko Univertsitatea, Bilbao.Find this resource:

Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay (1997b). On the complex nature of simple predicators. In Complex Predicates (ed. A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, and P. Sells), pp. 29–65. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay (2005). Aspect and the syntax of argument structure. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation (ed. N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport), pp. 11–41. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Hall, Ned (2004). Two concepts of causation. In Causation and Counterfactuals (ed. J. Collins, N. Hall, and L. Paul), pp. 225–76. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Halle, Morris and Marantz, Alec (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (ed. K. Hale and S. J. Keyser), pp. 111–76. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Halliday, Michael (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 1. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 37–81.Find this resource:

Halliday, Michael A. K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman, London.Find this resource:

Hallman, Peter (2010). Instants and intervals in the event/state distinction. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Hamm, Fritz, Kamp, Hans, and van Lambalgen, Michiel (2006). There is no opposition between formal and cognitive semantics. Theoretical Linguistics, 32, 1–40.Find this resource:

Hara, Masahiro (1999). Causatives in Japanese. Ms., Truman State University.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi (1995). Subjects, Events and Licensing. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi (1996). Sase bizarre: The Japanese causative and structural case. In Proceedings from the Canadian Linguistics Association (CLA 1995) (ed. P. Koskinen). University of Toronto Working Papers.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi (2005). How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation (ed. N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport), pp. 42–64. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi (2007). The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically, or why Mary can’t “exhibit John her paintings”. Ms., University of Arizona. Available at http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000435 (accessed 27 August 2018).Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi (2008). On the causative construction. In The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics (ed. S. Miyagawa and M. Saito), pp. 20–53. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi (2009). Roots and locality. Talk given at the Roots workshop, University of Stuttgart.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi (2012). Lexical decomposition in modern syntactic theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality (ed. W. Hinzen, M. Werning, and E. Machery), pp. 328–50. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi (2014). On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics, 40, 225–76.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi and Noyer, Rolf (2000). Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations. In The Lexicon/Encyclopaedia Interface (ed. B. Peeters), pp. 349–74. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

(p. 662) Harrington, Brian and Clark, Stephen (2009). ASKNet: Creating and evaluating large scale integrated semantic networks. International Journal of Semantic Computing, 2, 343–64.Find this resource:

Hasegawa, Nobuko (2001). Causatives and the role of v: Agent, causer, and experiencer. In Linguistics and Interdisciplinary Research: Proceedings of the COE International Symposium (ed. K. Inoue and N. Hasegawa), pp. 1–35. Kanda University of International Studies, Chiba.Find this resource:

Hasko, Victoria (2010). Semantic composition of motion verbs in Russian and English: The case of intra-typological variability. In New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion (ed. V. Hasko and R. Perelmutter), pp. 197–223. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (1993). More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity (ed. B. Comrie and M. Polinsky), pp. 87–120. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Haugen, Jason (2009). Hyponymous objects and late insertion. Lingua, 119, 242–62.Find this resource:

Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Chris, and Levin, Beth (1999). Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In Proceedings of SALT 9 (ed. T. Matthews and D. Strolovitch), pp. 127–44. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Heim, Irene (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Heim, Irene (1983). File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness. In Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language (ed. R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow), pp. 164–89. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Heim, Irene and Kratzer, Angelika (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

Heinämäki, Orvokki (1984). Aspect in Finnish. In Aspect Bound: A Voyage into the Realm of Germanic, Slavonic and Finno-Ugrian Aspectology (ed. C. de Groot and H. Tommola), pp. 153–77. Foris, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Henderson, James (2003). Neural network probability estimation for broad coverage parsing. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 1, pp. 131–8. ACL.Find this resource:

Henderson, James, Merlo, Paola, Musillo, Gabriele, and Titov, Ivan (2008). A latent variable model of synchronous parsing for syntactic and semantic dependencies. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 178–82. ACL.Find this resource:

Herbig, Gustav (1896). Aktionsart und Zeitstufe. Beiträge zur Funktionslehre des Indogermanischen Verbums. Indogermanische Forschungen, 6, 157–269.Find this resource:

Herdtfelder, Johanna and Maienborn, Claudia (2015). Causal modification of adjectival predicates: Insights from a corpus study on German causal von (‘from’). In Proceedings of IATL 30 (ed. N. Melnik), pp. 39–56. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Find this resource:

Herweg, Michael (1991). Perfective and imperfective aspect and the theory of events and states. Linguistics, 29, 969–1010.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James (1983). The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. Journal of Philosophy, 80, 100–27.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James (1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 547–93.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James (1986). Linguistic theory and Davidson’s program. In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (ed. E. Lepore), pp. 29–48. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James (1989). Elucidations of meaning. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 465–517.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James (2000a). Accomplishments. In GLOW in Asia II, pp. 72–82. Nanzan University, Nagoya.Find this resource:

(p. 663) Higginbotham, James (2000b). On events in linguistic semantics. In Speaking of Events (ed. J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. Varzi), pp. 49–79. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James (2005). Event positions: Suppression and emergence. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 349–58.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James and Ramchand, Gillian (1997). The stage-level/individual-level distinction and the mapping hypothesis. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology & Phonetics, 2, 53–83.Find this resource:

Himmelmann, Nikolaus and Schultze-Berndt, Eva (2005a). Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives (ed. N. Himmelmann and E. Schultze-Berndt), pp. 1–67. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Himmelmann, Nikolaus and Schultze-Berndt, Eva (2005b). Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Hinrichs, Erhard (1985). A Compositional Semantics for Aktionsarten and NP Reference in English. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University.Find this resource:

Hinton, Geoffrey (1990). Connectionist Symbol Processing. MIT Press/Elsevier, Cambridge, MA. Reprint of Artificial Intelligence, 46 (1–2).Find this resource:

Hirschbühler, Paul (2009). Différences grammaticales et lexicales dans la construction croisée. In Mélanges plurilingues offerts à Suzanne Schlyter à l’occasion de son 65ème anniversaire (ed. P. Bernardini, V. Egerland, and J. Granfeldt), pp. 127–45. Lunds Universitet, Lund.Find this resource:

Hobbs, Jerry (1990). Literature and cognition. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Hobbs, Jerry, Stickel, Mark, Appelt, Douglas, and Martin, Paul (1993). Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 63, 69–142.Find this resource:

Hoeks, John, Stowe, Laurie, and Doedens, Gina (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 59–73.Find this resource:

Hoekstra, Eric (1991). Licensing Conditions on Phrase Structure. Ph.D. thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Find this resource:

Hoekstra, Teun (1988). Small clause results. Lingua, 74, 101–39.Find this resource:

Hoekstra, Teun (1992a). Aspect and theta theory. In Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar (ed. I. Roca), pp. 145–74. Foris, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Hoekstra, Teun (1992b). Subjects inside out. Revue québécoise de linguistique, 22, 45–75.Find this resource:

Hornstein, Norbert (1990). As Time Goes By: Tense and Universal Grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Hornstein, Norbert (2002). A grammatical argument for a neo-davidsonian semantics. In Logical Form and Language (ed. G. Preyer and G. Peters), pp. 345–64. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Horrocks, Geoffrey and Stavrou, Melita (2003). Actions and their results in Greek and English: The complementarity of morphologically encoded (viewpoint) aspect and syntactic resultative predication. Journal of Semantics, 20, 297–327.Find this resource:

Horvath, Julia and Siloni, Tal (2011a). Anticausatives: Against reflexivization. Lingua, 121, 2176–86.Find this resource:

Horvath, Julia and Siloni, Tal (2011b). Causatives across components. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 657–704.Find this resource:

Horvath, Julia and Siloni, Tal (2013). Anticausatives have no causer: A rejoinder to Beavers and Koontz-Garboden (2013). Lingua, 131, 217–30.Find this resource:

Horvath, Julia and Siloni, Tal (2016). The thematic phase and the architecture of grammar. In Concepts, Syntax, and their Interface (ed. M. Everaert, M. Marelj, and E. Reuland), pp. 129–74. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

(p. 664) Hron, David (2012). Arity Operations—Domain of Application: A Comparative Study of Slavic Languages. Ph.D. thesis, Tel Aviv University.Find this resource:

Huang, Cheng-Teh James (2006). Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan, 253, 1–43.Find this resource:

Huang, Xuanfan and Tanangkingsing, Michael (2005). Reference to motion events in six Western Austronesian languages: Toward a semantic typology. Oceanic Linguistics, 44, 307–40.Find this resource:

Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Hudson, Richard (2002). Buying and selling in Word Grammar. Ms., available at http://dickhudson.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/buying.pdf (accessed 27 August 2018).

Hudson, Richard (2007). Language Networks: Towards a New Word Grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Hudson, Richard (2008). Lexical semantics and syntax: Commercial transactions reanalysed. Ms., available at http://dickhudson.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/lss.pdf (accessed 27 August 2018).

Hudson, Richard (2010). An Introduction to Word Grammar. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Hume, David (1748). An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. The Liberal Arts Press, New York. 1955 edition.Find this resource:

Hung, Henrietta (1988). The structure of derived nouns and verbs in Malagasy: A syntactic account. Ms., McGill University.Find this resource:

Husband, E. Matthew (2011). Rescuing manner/result complementarity from certain death. In CLS 47: The Main Session, pp. 111–24.Find this resource:

Husband, E. Matthew (2012a). On the Compositional Nature of States. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Husband, E. Matthew (2012b). Stages of individuals and the composition of states. The Linguistic Review, 29, 375–95.Find this resource:

Hwang, Jena, Bhatia, Archna, Bonial, Clare, Mansouri, Aous, Vaidya, Ashwini, Xue, Nianwen, and Palmer, Martha (2010). PropBank annotation of multilingual light verb constructions. In Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pp. 82–90. ACL.Find this resource:

Iacobini, Claudio (2009). Phrasal verbs between syntax and lexicon. Rivista di Linguistica, 21, 97–117.Find this resource:

Iacobini, Claudio and Masini, Francesca (2006). The emergence of verb–particle constructions in Italian: Locative and actional meanings. Morphology, 16, 155–88.Find this resource:

Iacobini, Claudio and Vergaro, Carla (2014). The role of inference in motion event encoding/decoding: A cross-linguistic inquiry into English and Italian. Lingue e Linguaggio, 13, 211–40.Find this resource:

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide (2004). Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 317–49.Find this resource:

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide (2006). Sound Symbolism and Motion in Basque. Lincom Europa, Munich.Find this resource:

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide (2009). Path salience in motion events. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (ed. J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, and Ş. Özçalışkan), pp. 403–14. Psychology Press, New York.Find this resource:

Ilić, Tatjana (2014). Modality and causation: Two sides of the same coin. In Causation in Grammatical Structures (ed. B. Copley and F. Martin), pp. 152–75. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

(p. 665) Imbert, Caroline (2012). Path: Ways typology has walked through it. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 236–58.Find this resource:

Ippolito, Michela (2004). An analysis of “still”. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (ed. R. Young), pp. 127–44. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Irimia, Monica-Alexandrina (2005). Types of secondary predication. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 25, 20–9.Find this resource:

Irimia, Monica-Alexandrina (2012). Secondary Predicates. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto.Find this resource:

Irmer, Matthias and Mueller-Reichau, Olav (2012). Conditions for the exclusion of immer noch in German adjectival passives. Paper presented at Concept Types and Frames in Language, Cognition, and Science (CTF’12), Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, August 2012.Find this resource:

Isard, Stephen (1974). What would you have done if … Theoretical Linguistics, 1, 233–55.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1969). Some Rules of Semantic Interpretation for English. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1973). The base rules for prepositional phrases. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle (ed. S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky), pp. 345–56. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language, 51, 639–71.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1976). Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry, 7, 89–150.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1983). Semantics and Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 369–411.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1990). Semantic Structures. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1995). The boundaries of the lexicon. In Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives (ed. M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, and R. Schreuder), pp. 133–65. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1996). The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 14, 305–54.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (2007). Language, Consciousness, Culture: Essays on Mental Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (2012). A User’s Guide to Thought and Meaning. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Jacobs, Joachim (1993). Integration. In Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur (ed. M. Reis), pp. 62–117. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Jacobs, Joachim (1999). Informational autonomy. In Focus: Linguistics, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives (ed. P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt), pp. 56–81. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Jacobsohn, Hermann (1933). Aspektfragen. Indogermanische Forschungen, 51, 292–318.Find this resource:

Jäger, Gerhard (2001). Topic–comment structure and the contrast between stage level and individual level predicates. Journal of Semantics, 18, 83–126.Find this resource:

Jakobson, Roman (1971a). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings, Volume II: Word and Language (ed. R. Jakobson), pp. 130–47. Mouton, The Hague.Find this resource:

(p. 666) Jakobson, Roman (1971b). Zur Struktur des Russischen Verbums. In Selected Writings, Volume II: Word and Language (ed. R. Jakobson), pp. 3–15. Mouton, The Hague.Find this resource:

Jayaseelan, K. A. (2008). Bare phrase structure and specifier-less syntax. Biolinguistics, 2, 87–106.Find this resource:

Jenks, Peter, Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, and Makasso, Emmanuel-Moselly (2013). Basaá and the lexical semantics of property concept nouns. Ms., University of California, Berkeley, University of Manchester, and Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Find this resource:

Jeong, Youngmi (2007). Applicatives: Structure and Interpretation from a Minimalist Perspective. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Jespersen, Otto (1924). The Philosophy of Grammar. George Allen and Unwin, London. Tenth impression, 1968.Find this resource:

Johnson, Mark (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Reason and Imagination. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Johnson-Laird, Philip (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Jones, Michael (1983). Speculations on the expression of movement in French. In A Festschrift for Peter Wexler (ed. J. Durand), University of Essex Language Centre Occasional Papers 27, pp. 165–94.Find this resource:

Jones, Michael (1996). Foundations of French Syntax. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Julien, Marit (2002). Determiners and word order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica, 56, 264–314.Find this resource:

Kagan, Olga (2010). Russian aspect as number in the verbal domain. In Layers of Aspect (ed. B. Laca and P. Cabredo Hofherr), pp. 125–46. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Kageyama, Taro (2003). Why English motion verbs are special. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 3, 341–73.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (1975). Two theories of adjectives. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language (ed. E. Keenan), pp. 123–55. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (1979). Events, instants and temporal reference. In Semantics from Different Points of View (ed. R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow), pp. 376–416. Springer, Berlin. Reprinted in von Heusinger and ter Meulen (2013).Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (1980). Some remarks on the logic of change: Part I. In Time, Tense and Quantifiers (ed. C. Rohrer), pp. 135–80. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (1981a). Evénements, représentations discursives et référence temporelle. Langages, 64, 39–64. For the original English ms. from which this paper is the French translation, see Kamp (2017a).Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (1981b). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Formal Methods in the Study of Language (ed. J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof), pp. 277–322. Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (1999–2007). Intentions, plans and their execution: Turning objects of thought into entities of the external world. Ms., Universität Stuttgart.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (2001). Presupposition computation and presupposition justification: One aspect of the interpretation of multi-sentence discourse. In Semantic and Pragmatic Issues in Discourse and Dialogue (ed. M. Bras and L. Vieu), pp. 57–84. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Reprinted in von Heusinger and ter Meulen (2013).Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (2017a). Events, discourse representations and temporal reference. Semantics and Pragmatics, 10.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (2017b). Semantics II. Unpublished notes for a graduate course offered at the University of Texas, Austin.Find this resource:

(p. 667) Kamp, Hans and Reyle, Uwe (1993). From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans and Reyle, Uwe (1996). A calculus for first order discourse representation structures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 5, 297–348.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans and Reyle, Uwe (2011). Discourse Representation Theory. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Volume 1 (ed. K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, and P. Portner), pp. 872–923. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans and Rohrer, Christian (1983). Tense in texts. In Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language (ed. R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow), pp. 250–69. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans, van Genabith, Josef, and Reyle, Uwe (2011). Discourse Representation Theory: An updated survey. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 15 (2nd edn) (ed. D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner), pp. 125–394. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Kaplan, David (1989). Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan (ed. J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein), pp. 481–563. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Karttunen, Lauri (1971). Implicative verbs. Language, 47, 340–58.Find this resource:

Karttunen, Lauri (1973). Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 169–93.Find this resource:

Karttunen, Lauri (1974). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1, 181–94.Find this resource:

Karttunen, Lauri (2007). Word play. Computational Linguistics, 33, 443–67.Find this resource:

Karttunen, Lauri (2012). Simple and phrasal implicatives. In Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), pp. 124–31. ACL.Find this resource:

Kato, Atsuhiko (2014). Event cancellation in Burmese. Paper presented to the 24th Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society.Find this resource:

Katz, Graham (2000). Anti neo-davidsonianism: Against a Davidsonian semantics for state sentences. In Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Syntax and Lexical Semantics (ed. C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky), pp. 393–416. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Katz, Graham (2003a). Event arguments, adverb selection, and the stative adverb gap. In Modifying Adjuncts (ed. E. Lang, C. Maienborn, and C. Fabricius-Hansen), pp. 455–74. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Katz, Graham (2003b). On the stativity of the English perfect. In Perfect Explorations (ed. A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert, and A. von Stechow), pp. 205–34. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Katz, Jerrold and Postal, Paul (1964). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard (1984). Connectedness and Binary Branching. Foris, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard (1985). Principles of particle constructions. In Grammatical Representation (ed. J. Guéron, H.-G. Obenauer, and J.-Y. Pollock), pp. 101–40. Foris, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard (2008). Antisymmetry and the lexicon. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook, Volume 8 (ed. J. van Craenenbroeck and J. Rooryck), pp. 1–31. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Kearns, Kate (2007). Telic senses of deadjectival verbs. Lingua, 117, 26–66.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward (1976). Towards a universal definition of “subject”. In Subject and Topic (ed. C. Li), pp. 303–33. Academic Press, New York.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward and Comrie, Bernard (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward and Polinsky, Maria (2001). Malagasy morphology. In Handbook of Morphology (ed. A. Zwicky and A. Spencer), pp. 563–623. Blackwell, Malden, MA.Find this resource:

(p. 668) Kehler, Andrew (2002). Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Kehler, Andrew and Cohen, Jonathan (2018). On convention and coherence. In Beyond Semantics and Pragmatics (ed. G. Preyer). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 261–83.Find this resource:

Kehler, Andrew, Kertz, Laura, Rohde, Hannah, and Elman, Jeffrey (2008). Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics, 25, 1–44.Find this resource:

Kemmer, Suzanne and Verhagen, Arie (1994). The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 115–56.Find this resource:

Kemmerer, David (2012). The cross-linguistic prevalence of SOV and SVO word orders reflects the sequential and hierarchical representation of action in Broca’s area. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 50–66.Find this resource:

Kemmerer, David, Weber-Fox, Christine, Price, Karen, Zdanczyk, Cynthia, and Way, Heather (2007). Big brown dog or brown big dog? An electrophysiological study of semantic constraints on prenominal adjective order. Brain and Language, 100, 238–56.Find this resource:

Kempson, Ruth (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Chris (1999). Gradable adjectives denote measure functions, not partial functions. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29, 65–80.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Christopher (2007). Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 1–45.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Christopher (2012). The composition of incremental change. In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-categorial View of Event Structure (ed. V. Demonte and L. McNally), pp. 104–21. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Christopher and Levin, Beth (2008). Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse (ed. L. McNally and C. Kennedy), pp. 156–82. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Christopher and McNally, Louise (1999). From event structure to scale structure: Degree modification in deverbal adjectives. In Proceedings from Semantics And Linguistic Theory IX (ed. T. Matthews and D. Strolovitch), pp. 163–80. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Christopher and McNally, Louise (2005). Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language, 81, 345–81.Find this resource:

Kenny, Anthony (1963). Action, Emotion, and Will. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Find this resource:

Kessakul, Ruetaivan (2001). Two faces of linguistic encoding in Thai motion events: Evidence from Thai spoken narrative discourse compared with Japanese. In Papers from the 9th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (ed. G. Thurgood), pp. 73–89. Program for Southeast Asian Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.Find this resource:

Kiefer, Ferenc (2009). Types of temporal adverbials and the fine structure of events. In Adverbs and Adverbial Adjuncts at the Interfaces (ed. K. É. Kiss), pp. 241–62. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana, Newell, Heather, Noonan, Máire, and Travis, Lisa deMena (2016). Phase domains at PF: Root suppletion and its implications. In Morphological Metatheory (ed. H. Harley and D. Siddiqi), pp. 121–62. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Killimangalam, Ashtamurty and Michaels, Jennifer (2007). Syntactically conditioned phonology—Agentive suffixes in Malayalam. Handout, 81st Annual Meeting of the LSA, Anaheim, CA.Find this resource:

Kim, Albert and Osterhout, Lee (2005). The indepedence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 205–25.Find this resource:

Kim, Jaegwon (1969). Events and their descriptions: Some considerations. In Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel (ed. N. Rescher), pp. 198–215. Reidel, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Kim, Jaegwon (1976). Events as property exemplifications. In Action Theory. Proceedings of the Winnipeg Conference on Human Action (ed. M. Brand and D. Walton), pp. 159–77. Reidel, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

(p. 669) Klein, Ewan (1980). A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 1–45.Find this resource:

Klein, Ewan (1991). Comparatives. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung (Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research) (ed. A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich), pp. 673–91. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Klein, Ewan and Sag, Ivan (1985). Type-driven translation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, 162–202.Find this resource:

Klein, Natalie (2011). Convention and Cognition: Weak Definite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester.Find this resource:

Klein, Wolfgang (1994). Time in Language. Routledge, London.Find this resource:

Klein, Wolfgang (2010). On times and arguments. Linguistics, 48, 1221–53.Find this resource:

Knoeferle, Pia, Habets, Boukje, Crocker, Matthew, and Münte, Thomas (2008). Visual scenes trigger immediate syntactic reanalysis: Evidence from ERPs during situated spoken comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 789–95.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp, Hoang, Hieu, Birch, Alexandra, Callison-Burch, Chris, Federico, Marcello, Bertoldi, Nicola, Cowan, Brooke, Shen, Wade, Moran, Christine, and Zens, Richard (2007). Moses: Open source toolkit for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL: Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions, pp. 177–80. ACL.Find this resource:

Koelsch, Stefan and Siebel, Walter (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 578–84.Find this resource:

Koelsch, Stefan, Gunter, Thomas, Wittfoth, Matthias, and Sammler, Daniela (2005). Interaction between syntax processing in language and in music: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1565–77.Find this resource:

Koenig, Jean-Pierre and Chief, Lian-Cheng (2007). Scalarity and state-changes in Mandarin (and other languages). In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7 (ed. O. Bonami and P. Cabredo Hoffherr), pp. 241–62.Find this resource:

Koenig, Jean-Pierre and Davis, Anthony (2001). Sublexical modality and the structure of lexical semantic representations. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, 71–124.Find this resource:

Koenig, Jean-Pierre and Muansuwan, Nuttanart (2000). How to end without ever finishing: Thai semi-perfectivity. Journal of Semantics, 17, 147–84.Find this resource:

Koenig, Jean-Pierre, Mauner, Gail, Bienvenue, Breton, and Conklin, Kathy (2008). What with? The anatomy of a (proto)-role. Journal of Semantics, 25, 175–220.Find this resource:

Koerner, Ernst Frideryk Konrad (2002). Toward a History of American Linguistics. Taylor and Francis, London.Find this resource:

Koffka, Kurt (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., London.Find this resource:

Koizumi, Masatoshi (1994). Secondary predicates. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, 25–59.Find this resource:

Kolk, Herman, Chwilla, Dorothee, van Herten, Marieke, and Oor, Patrick (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85, 1–36.Find this resource:

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew (2005). On the typology of state/change of state alternations. In Yearboook of Morphology 2005 (ed. G. Booij and J. van Marle), pp. 83–117. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew (2007). Aspectual coercion and the typology of change of state predicates. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 115–52.Find this resource:

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew (2009a). Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 27, 77–138.Find this resource:

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew (2009b). The lexical semantics of derived statives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 33, 1–40.Find this resource:

(p. 670) Koontz-Garboden, Andrew and Francez, Itamar (2010). Possessed property concepts. Natural Language Semantics, 18, 197–240.Find this resource:

Koopman, Hilda (2000). The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads: Collected Essays of Hilda J. Koopman. Routledge, London.Find this resource:

Koopman, Hilda and Sportiche, Dominique (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85, 211–58.Find this resource:

Kopecka, Anetta (2006). The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories (ed. M. Hickmann and S. Robert), pp. 83–101. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Kopecka, Anetta (2009). L’expression du déplacement en français: l’interaction des facteurs sémantiques, aspectuels et pragmatiques dans la construction du sens spatial. Langages, 173, 54–77.Find this resource:

Korzen, Iørn (2007). Linguistic typology, text structure and appositions. Scolia, 22, 21–42.Find this resource:

Kourtzi, Zoe and Kanwisher, Nancy (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 48–55.Find this resource:

Kowalski, Robert and Sergot, Maurice (1986). A logic-based calculus of events. New Generation Computing, 4, 67–95.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (1981). The notional category of modality. In Words, Worlds, and Contexts (ed. H. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser), pp. 38–74. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (1986). Conditionals. In Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 1–15.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (1991). Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (ed. A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich), pp. 639–50. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (1994). The event argument and the semantics of Voice. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (1995). Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The Generic Book (ed. G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier), pp. 125–75. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (1996). Severing the external argument from the verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon (ed. J. Rooryck and L. Zaring), pp. 109–37. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (1998). Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide scope indefinites? In Events and Grammar (ed. S. Rothstein), pp. 163–96. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (2000a). Building statives. In Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (ed. L. Conathan, J. Good, D. Kavitskaya, A. Wulf, and A. Yu), pp. 385–99.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (2000b). The event argument and the semantics of verbs. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (2004). Telicity and the meaning of objective case. In The Syntax of Time (ed. J. Guéron and J. Lecarme), pp. 389–424. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (2005). Building resultatives. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications (ed. C. Maienborn and A. Wöllstein), pp. 177–212. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (2012). Modals and Conditionals: New and Revised Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Krejci, Bonnie (2014). What is raining? English weather it revisited. Extended abstract, 88th LSA Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MI. Online at https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/ExtendedAbs/article/view/2405 (accessed 27 August 2018).Find this resource:

Krifka, Manfred (1987). Nominal reference and temporal constitution: Towards a semantics of quantity. In Proceedings of the 6th Amsterdam Colloquium (ed. J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof, and (p. 671) F. Veltman), pp. 153–73. Institute of Linguistic, Logic and Information, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Krifka, Manfred (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and Contextual Expression (ed. R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas), pp. 75–115. Foris, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Krifka, Manfred (1990). Four thousand ships passed through the lock: Object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 487–520.Find this resource:

Krifka, Manfred (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters (ed. I. Sag and A. Szabolcsi), pp. 29–53. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Krifka, Manfred (1998). The origins of telicity. In Events and Grammar (ed. S. Rothstein), pp. 197–235. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Krifka, Manfred (2013). Definitional generics. In Genericity (ed. A. Mari, C. Beyssade, and F. Del Prete), pp. 372–89. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Krifka, Manfred, Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, Carlson, Gregory, ter Meulen, Alice, Chierchia, Gennaro, and Link, Godehard (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In The Generic Book (ed. G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier), pp. 1–125. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Kuperberg, Gina (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49.Find this resource:

Kuperberg, Gina (2013). The pro-active comprehender: What event-related potentials tell us about the dynamics of reading comprehension. In Unraveling Reading Comprehension: Behavioral, Neurobiological, and Genetic Components (ed. B. Miller, L. Cutting, and P. McCardle), pp. 176–92. Paul Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, MD.Find this resource:

Kuperberg, Gina, Sitnikova, Tatiana, Caplan, David, and Holcomb, Phillip (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 117–29.Find this resource:

Kurby, Christopher and Zacks, Jeffrey (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 72–79.Find this resource:

Kuroda, S.-Y. (1993). Lexical and productive causatives in Japanese: An examination of the theory of paradigmatic structure. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 15, 1–81.Find this resource:

Kutas, Marta and Federmeier, Kara (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–47.Find this resource:

Kutas, Marta and Hillyard, Steven (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–5.Find this resource:

Kutas, Marta and Hillyard, Steven (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–3.Find this resource:

Labelle, Marie (1992). Change of state and valency. Journal of Linguistics, 28, 375–414.Find this resource:

Labelle, Marie and Doron, Edit (2010). Anticausative derivations (and other valency alternations) in French. Probus, 22, 303–6.Find this resource:

Ladusaw, William (1994). Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV (ed. M. Harvey and L. Santelmann), pp. 220–9. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George (1965). On the nature of syntactic irregularity. Technical Report NSF-i6, The Computation Laboratory of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George (1970). Linguistics and natural logic. Synthese, 22, 151–271. Reprinted in Davidson, Donald, and Harman, Gilbert (1972) Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 545–665. Reidel, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George (1994a). Conceptual metaphor home page. http://www.lang.osaka-u.ac.jp/sugimoto/MasterMetaphorList/MetaphorHome.html (accessed 27 August 2018).

(p. 672) Lakoff, George (1994b). The master metaphor list. Ms., University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books, New York.Find this resource:

Lambert-Brétière, Renée (2009). Serializing languages as satellite-framed: The case of Fon. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 1–29.Find this resource:

Landau, Idan (2010). The explicit structure of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 357–88.Find this resource:

Landauer, Thomas and Dumais, Susan (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis of the acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–40.Find this resource:

Landauer, Thomas and Dumais, Susan (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis of the acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–40.Find this resource:

Landman, Fred (1992). The progressive. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 1–32.Find this resource:

Landman, Fred (2000). Events and Plurality: The Jerusalem Lectures. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Landman, Fred and Rothstein, Susan (2010). Incremental homogeneity and the semantics of aspectual for-phrases. In Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure (ed. M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, and I. Sichel), pp. 229–51. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Landman, Meredith (2006). Variables in Natural Language. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Landman, Meredith and Morzycki, Marcin (2003). Event-kinds and manner modification. In Proceedings of the Western Conference in Linguistics (WECOL) 2002 (ed. N. M. Antrim, G. Goodall, M. Schulte-Nafeh, and V. Samiian), pp. 136–47. California State University, Fresno, CA.Find this resource:

Langacker, Ronald (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA.Find this resource:

Langacker, Ronald (1990). Concept, Image, and Symbol. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Langacker, Ronald (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Larson, Richard (1988a). Light predicate raising. Lexicon Project Working Papers 27, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Larson, Richard (1988b). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335–91.Find this resource:

Larson, Richard (1998). Events and modification in nominals. In Proceedings of SALT 8 (ed. D. Strolovitch and A. Lawson), pp. 145–68. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Larson, Richard (2014). On Shell Structure. Routledge, London.Find this resource:

Lascarides, Alex and Asher, Nicholas (1991). Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 55–62. ACL.Find this resource:

Lascarides, Alex and Asher, Nicholas (1993). Temporal interpretation, discourse relations, and common sense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, 437–49.Find this resource:

Lasersohn, Peter (1995). Plurality, Conjunction and Events. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Lasher, Margot (1981). The cognitive representation of an event involving human motion. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 391–406.Find this resource:

Lassiter, Daniel and Goodman, Noah (2013). Context, scale structure and statistics in the interpretation of positive-form adjectives. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 23 (ed. T. Snider), pp. 587–610.Find this resource:

LaTerza, Christopher (2014). Distributivity and Plural Anaphora. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.Find this resource:

Lau, Ellen, Holcomb, Phillip, and Kuperberg, Gina (2013). Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single-word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 484–502.Find this resource:

(p. 673) Lechner, Winfried (2005). Semantic effects of head movement. Paper presented at XXI Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Universitá degli Studi Roma Tre, 24–26 February 2005.Find this resource:

Lefeuvre, Anaïs, Moot, Richard, Retoré, Christian, and Sandillon-Rezer, Noémie-Fleur (2012). Traitement automatique sur corpus de récits de voyages pyrénéens. In Actes de la conférence conjointe JEP–TALN–RECITAL 2012. Volume 2: TALN (ed. G. Antoniadis, H. Blanchon, and G. Sérasset), Grenoble, pp. 43–56. ATALA.Find this resource:

Legate, Julie-Ann (2002). Warlpiri: Theoretical Implications. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Legendre, Géraldine (1997). Secondary predication and functional projections in French. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 15, 43–87.Find this resource:

Lehmann, Christian (1990). Towards lexical typology. In Studies in Typology and Diachrony: Papers Presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th Birthday (ed. W. Croft, S. Kemmer, and K. Denning), pp. 161–85. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Lemmon, Edward (1967). Comments on D. Davidson’s “The logical form of action sentences”. In The Logic of Decision and Action (ed. N. Rescher), pp. 96–103. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.Find this resource:

LePore, Ernest (1985). The semantics of action, event, and singular causal sentences. In Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (ed. E. LePore and B. McLaughlin), pp. 151–61. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

Lepore, Ernie and Stone, Matthew (2015). Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Leskien, August (1919). Grammatik der altbulgarischen (altkirchenslavischen) Sprache. Carl Winter, Heidelberg.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth and Rapoport, Tova (1988). Lexical subordination. In CLS 24, Part 1: The General Session, pp. 275–89.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth and Rappaport, Malka (1986). The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 623–61.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (1999). Two structures for compositionally derived events. In Proceedings of SALT 9 (ed. T. Matthews and D. Strolovitch). CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2004). The semantic determinants of argument expression: A view from the English resultative construction. In The Syntax of Time (ed. J. Guéron and J. Lecarme), pp. 477–94. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2005). Argument Realization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2011). Lexical conceptual structure. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Volume 1 (ed. C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, and P. Portner), pp. 418–438. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2013). Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates (ed. B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, and R. Marín), pp. 49–70. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2014). Manner and result: A view from clean. In Language Description Informed by Theory (ed. R. Pensalfini, M. Turpin, and D. Guillemin), pp. 337–57. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

(p. 674) Levin, Beth, Beavers, John, and Tham, Shiao Wei (2009). Manner of motion roots across languages: Same or different? Handout, Workshop on Roots: Word Formation from the Perspective of ‘Core Lexical Elements’, Universität Stuttgart. Online at http://web.stanford.edu/bclevin/stutt09mot.pdf (accessed 27 August 2018).

Levinson, Lisa (2007). The Roots of Verbs. Ph.D. thesis, New York University.Find this resource:

Levinson, Lisa (2010). Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 28, 135–82.Find this resource:

Lewandowski, Wojciech (2014). The locative alternation in verb-framed vs. satellite-framed languages: A corpus study of Spanish and Polish. Studies in Language, 38, 864–95.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1968). On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1970). General semantics. Synthese, 22, 18–67. Reprinted in Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert (1972) Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 169–218. Reidel, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1975). Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1977). Causation. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 556–67. Reprinted in David Lewis (1986) Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, pp. 159–213. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (Postscripts are added in this reprinting.)Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1983). New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, 343–77.Find this resource:

Lewis, Mike (2015). Combined Distributional and Logical Semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Find this resource:

Lewis, Mike and Steedman, Mark (2013a). Combined distributional and logical semantics. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1, 179–92.Find this resource:

Lewis, Mike and Steedman, Mark (2013b). Unsupervised induction of cross-lingual semantic relations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, WA, pp. 681–92. ACL.Find this resource:

Lewis, Mike and Steedman, Mark (2014a). A* CCG parsing with a supertag-factored model. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Doha, pp. 990–1000. ACL.Find this resource:

Lewis, Mike and Steedman, Mark (2014b). Combining formal and distributional models of temporal and intensional semantics. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Semantic Parsing, Baltimore, MD, pp. 28–32. ACL.Find this resource:

Lewis, Mike and Steedman, Mark (2014c). Improved CCG parsing with semi-supervised supertagging. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2, 327–38.Find this resource:

Lifschitz, Vladimir (1988). Circumscriptive theories: A logic-based framework for knowledge representation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17, 391–441.Find this resource:

Lin, Dekang (1998). Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics/Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Montreal, QC, pp. 768–74.Find this resource:

Lin, Jingxia and Peck, Jeeyoung (2011). The syntax–semantics interface of multi-morpheme motion constructions in Chinese: An analysis based on hierarchical scalar structure. Studies in Language, 35, 337–79.Find this resource:

Lin, Tzong-Hong (2001). Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Irvine.Find this resource:

Lindstedt, Jouko (1985). On the Semantics of Tense and Aspect in Bulgarian. Slavica Helsigiensia, Helsinki.Find this resource:

Link, Godehard (1983). The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language (ed. R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow), pp. 303–23. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

(p. 675) Link, Godehard (1987). Algebraic semantics of event structures. In Proceedings of the Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium (ed. J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof, and F. Veltman), pp. 243–62. ITLI, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Link, Godehard (1997). Algebraic Semantics in Language and Philosophy. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Liu, Baolin, Wang, Zhongning, and Jin, Zhixing (2009). The integration processing of the visual and auditory information in videos of real-world events: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 461, 7–11.Find this resource:

Liu, Baolin, Wang, Zhongning, Wu, Gunagning, and Meng, Xianyao (2011). Cognitive integration of asynchronous natural or non-natural auditory and visual information in videos of real-world events: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience, 180, 181–90.Find this resource:

Lohndal, Terje (2014). Phrase Structure and Argument Structure: A Case Study of the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Lombard, Lawrence (1986). Events: A Metaphysical Study. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Find this resource:

Lombard, Lawrence (1998). Ontologies of events. In Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics (ed. S. Laurence and C. Macdonald), pp. 277–94. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

Longacre, Robert (1983). The Grammar of Discourse. Plenum Press, New York.Find this resource:

Lowe, Edward Jonathan (2006). The Four-category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Lu, John H.-T. (1973). The verb–verb construction with a directional complement in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1, 239–55.Find this resource:

Lu, John H.-T. (1977). Resultative verb compounds vs. directional verb compounds in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 5, 277–313.Find this resource:

Mackie, John (1974). The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Madden, Carol and Ferretti, Todd (2009). Verb aspect and the mental representation of situations. In The Expression of Time (ed. W. Klein and P. Li), pp. 217–40. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Maess, Burkhard, Koelsch, Stefan, Gunter, Thomas, and Friederici, Angela (2001). Musical syntax is processed in Broca’s area: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 540–5.Find this resource:

Magri, Giorgio (2009). A theory of individual level predicates based on blind manadatory scalar implicatures. Natural Language Semantics, 17, 245–97.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2001). On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 191–240.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2003a). Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2003b). Event-internal modifiers: Semantic underspecification and conceptual interpretation. In Modifying Adjuncts (ed. E. Lang, C. Maienborn, and C. Fabricius-Hansen), pp. 475–509. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2004). A pragmatic explanation of the stage level/individual level contrast in combination with locatives. In Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics 15 (ed. B. Agbayani, V. Samiian, and B. Tucker), pp. 158–70. California State University, Fresno, CA.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2005a). A discourse-based account of Spanish ser/estar. Linguistics, 43, 155–80.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2005b). On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 275–316.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2005c). Eventualities and different things: A reply. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 383–96.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2007a). Das Zustandspassiv: Grammatische Einordnung—Bildungsbeschränkung—Interpretationsspielraum. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 35, 83–144.Find this resource:

(p. 676) Maienborn, Claudia (2007b). On Davidsonian and Kimian states. In Existence: Semantics and Syntax (ed. I. Comorovski and K. von Heusinger), pp. 107–30. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2009). Building event-based ad hoc properties: On the interpretation of adjectival passives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13 (ed. A. Riester and T. Solstad), pp. 35–49. Universität Stuttgart.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2011a). Event semantics. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Volume 1 (ed. C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, and P. Portner), pp. 802–29. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia (2011b). Strukturausbau am Rande der Wörter: Adverbiale Modifikatoren beim Zustandspassiv. In Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik (ed. S. Engelberg, A. Holler, and K. Proost), pp. 317–43. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia and Geldermann, Sascha (2013). ‘Expertengeprüft’ und ‘vom Experten geprüft’: Zur Semantik von Nomen-Partizip II-Komposita und ihrer präpositionalen Partner. In Interfaces of Morphology: A Festschrift for Susan Olsen (ed. H. Härtl), pp. 127–61. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia and Herdtfelder, Johanna (2015). A compositional account of the eventive/stative ambiguity of German causal von-modifiers. In Proceedings of the 25th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (ed. S. D’Antonio, M. Moroney, and C. R. Little), pp. 163–83.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia and Herdtfelder, Johanna (2017). Eventive vs. stative causation: The case of German causal von-modifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy, 40, pp. 279–320.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia and Schäfer, Martin (2011). Adverbs and adverbials. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Volume 2 (ed. K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, and P. Portner), pp. 1390–420. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia, von Heusinger, Klaus, and Portner, Paul (2012). Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Volume 3. De Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Maienborn, Claudia, Gese, Helga, and Stolterfoht, Britta (2016). Adverbial modifiers in adjectival passives. Journal of Semantics, 33, 299–358.Find this resource:

Malblanc, Alfred (1968). Stylistique comparée du français et de l’allemand. Didier, Paris.Find this resource:

Mann, William and Thompson, Sandra (1987). Rhetorical Structure Theory: A theory of text organization. Technical Report RS-87-190, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA.Find this resource:

Mann, William and Thompson, Sandra (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243–81.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (1981). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (1984). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (1996). “Cat” as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in Distributed Morphology. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In U.Penn Working Papers in Linguistics. Volume 4.2: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (ed. A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark, and A. Williams), pp. 201–25.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (2000). Roots: The universality of root and pattern morphology. Paper presented at the conference on Afro-Asiatic languages, Université Paris VII.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (2001). Words. Paper presented at WCCFL XX, University of Southern California.Find this resource:

(p. 677) Marantz, Alec (2005). Objects out of the lexicon: Objects as events. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (2007). Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar (ed. S.-H. Choe), pp. 191–222. Dong In, Seoul.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (2013a). Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris Halle (ed. O. Matushansky and A. Marantz), pp. 95–116. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (2013b). Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua, 130, 152–68.Find this resource:

Mari, Alda, Beyssade, Claire, and Del Prete, Fabio (2013). Genericity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Martin, Fabienne (2015). Explaining the link between agentivity and non-culminating causation. In Proceedings of SALT 25 (ed. S. D’Antonio, M. Moroney, and C. R. Little), pp. 246–66.Find this resource:

Martin, Fabienne and Schäfer, Florian (2012). The modality of offer and other defeasible causatives. In Proceedings of WCCFL 30 (ed. N. Arnett and R. Bennett), pp. 248–58. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.Find this resource:

Martin, Fabienne and Schäfer, Florian (2013). Marked and unmarked anticausatives do not differ in meaning: A French case study. Handout of talk given at the ‘Perspectives on argument alternations’ conference, Universität Potsdam.Find this resource:

Martin, James (1992). English Text: Systems and Structure. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Martínez Vázquez, Montserrat (1998). Effected objects in English and Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 1, 245–64.Find this resource:

Martínez Vázquez, Montserrat (2001). Delimited events in English and Spanish. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 9, 31–59.Find this resource:

Martínez Vázquez, Montserrat (2013). Intralinguistic variation in the expression of motion events in English and Spanish. Lingue e Linguaggi, 9, 143–56.Find this resource:

Masini, Francesca (2005). Multi-word expressions between syntax and the lexicon: The case of Italian verb–particle constructions. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 18, 145–73.Find this resource:

Massam, Diane (2001). Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19, 153–97.Find this resource:

Massin, Olivier (2009). The metaphysics of forces. Dialectica, 63, 555–89.Find this resource:

Mateu Fontanals, Jaume (2000). Why can’t we wipe the slate clean? A lexical-syntactic approach to resultative constructions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 71–95.Find this resource:

Mateu, Jaume (2001). Small clause results revisited. In Syntax of Predication: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Syntax of Predication, ZAS Papers in Linguistics 26, pp. 127–52.Find this resource:

Mateu, Jaume (2003). Parametrizing verbal polysemy: The case of bake revisited. In CLS 39: The Main Session, pp. 256–69.Find this resource:

Mateu, Jaume (2008). On the l-syntax of directionality/resultativity: The case of Germanic preverbs. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P (ed. A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke, and R. Nouwen), pp. 221–50. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Mateu, Jaume (2010). On the l-syntax of manner and causation. In Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations: A Cross-linguistic Perspective (ed. M. Duguine, S. Huidobro, and N. Madariaga), pp. 89–112. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Mateu, Jaume (2012a). Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure (ed. V. Demonte and L. McNally), pp. 252–78. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

(p. 678) Mateu, Jaume (2012b). Structure of the verb phrase. In The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics (ed. J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea, and E. O’Rourke), pp. 333–53. Wiley, Chichester.Find this resource:

Mateu, Jaume and Acedo-Matellán, Victor (2012). The manner/result complementarity revisited: A syntactic approach. In The End of Argument Structure (ed. M. C. Cuervo and Y. Roberge), pp. 209–28. Emerald, Bingley.Find this resource:

Mateu, Jaume and Rigau, Gemma (2009). Romance paths as cognate complements: A lexical-syntactic account. In Romance Linguistics 2007: Selected Papers from the 37th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (ed. P. J. Masullo, E. O’Rourke, and C.-H. Huang), pp. 227–41. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Mateu, Jaume and Rigau, Gemma (2010). Verb–particle constructions in Romance: A lexical-syntactic account. Probus, 22, 241–69.Find this resource:

Matsumoto, Yo (1996). Complex Predicates in Japanese: A Syntactic and Semantic Study of the Notion ‘Word’. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Matsumoto, Yo (1998). A reexamination of the cross-linguistic parameterization of causative predicates: Japanese perspectives. In Proceedings of the LFG98 Conference (ed. M. Butt and T. Holloway King), CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Matsumoto, Yo (2003). Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In Empirical and Theoretical Investigations into Language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (ed. S. Chiba), pp. 403–18. Kaitakusha, Tokyo.Find this resource:

May, Robert (1977). The Grammar of Quantification. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

May, Robert (1985). Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

McCawley, James (1968). Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. In Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 19–20, 1968 (ed. B. Darden, C.-J. Bailey, and A. Davison), pp. 71–80.Find this resource:

McCawley, James (1971). Prelexical syntax. In Report of the Twenty-Second Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies (ed. R. O’Brien), pp. 19–34. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.Find this resource:

McCawley, James (1972). Kac and Shibatani on the grammar of killing. In Syntax and Semantics 1 (ed. J. Kimball), pp. 139–49. Academic Press, New York.Find this resource:

McCawley, James (1973). Syntactic and logical arguments for semantic structures. In Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory (ed. O. Fujimura), pp. 259–376. TEC Corporation, Tokyo.Find this resource:

McCloskey, James (1997). Subjecthood and subject positions. In Elements of Grammar (ed. L. Haegeman), pp. 197–235. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

McClure, William (1994). Syntactic Projections of the Semantics of Aspect. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.Find this resource:

McGinnis, Martha (2001). Variation in the phase structure of applicatives. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1 (ed. P. Pica and J. Rooryck), pp. 105–146. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

McIntyre, Andrew (2004). Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shells. Linguistics, 42, 523–71.Find this resource:

McIntyre, Andrew (2013). Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. In Non-Canonical Passives (ed. A. Alexiadou and F. Schäfer), pp. 21–42. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

McKay, Thomas (2006). Plural Predication. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

McNally, Louise (1992). An Interpretation for the English Existential Construction. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz. Published in 1997 by Garland Press, New York.Find this resource:

McNally, Louise (1998a). Existential sentences without existential quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, 353–92.Find this resource:

(p. 679) McNally, Louise (1998b). Stativity and theticity. In Events and Grammar (ed. S. Rothstein), pp. 293–307. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

McNally, Louise (2011). The relative role of property type and scale structure in explaining the behavior of gradable adjectives. In Papers from the ESSLLI 2009 Workshop on Vagueness in Communication (ed. R. Nouwen, R. van Rooij, U. Sauerland, and H.-C. Schmitz), pp. 151–68. Springer, Berlin.Find this resource:

McNally, Louise and Boleda, Gemma (2004). Relational adjectives as properties of kinds. In Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 5 (ed. O. Bonami and P. C. Hofherr), pp. 179–96. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss5 (accessed 27 August 2018).Find this resource:

McNulty, Elaine (1988). The Syntax of Adjunct Predicates. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.Find this resource:

Mehlig, Hans Robert (2001). Verbal aspect and the referential status of verbal predicates: On aspect usage in Russian who-questions. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 9, 99–125.Find this resource:

Mehlig, Hans Robert (2013). Obščefaktičeskoe i edinično-faktičeskoe značenija nesoveršennogo vida v russkom jazyke. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta Serija 9, Filologija, 4, 19–47.Find this resource:

Melka, Francine (2003). Verbes de mouvement et verbes résultatifs en langues romanes et germaniques. In Actas del XXIII Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filológia Romanica, vol 2/2 (ed. F. Sánchez Miret), pp. 55–63. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Meltzer-Asscher, Aya (2011). Adjectival passives in Hebrew: Evidence for parallelism between the adjectival and verbal systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 815–55.Find this resource:

Menon, Mythili and Pancheva, Roumyana (2014). The grammatical life of property concept roots in Malayalam. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18 (ed. U. Etxeberria, A. Fălăuş, A. Irurtzun, and B. Leferman), pp. 289–302.Find this resource:

Menzies, Peter (2009). Counterfactual theories of causation. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. E. Zalta). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/causation-counterfactual/ (accessed 27 August 2018).Find this resource:

Merchant, Jason (2013). Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 44, 77–108.Find this resource:

Merchant, Jason (2015). How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry, 46, 273–303.Find this resource:

Merlo, Paola (1986). Secondary predication in Italian and English. Tesi di laurea, Università di Venezia.Find this resource:

Merlo, Paola (1989). Risultative in Italiano ed Inglese. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 14, 29–53.Find this resource:

Metusalem, Ross, Kutas, Marta, Urbach, Thomas, Hare, Mary, McRae, Ken, and Elman, Jeffrey (2012). Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 545–67.Find this resource:

Michaels, Jennifer (2009). To alternate or not to alternate: What is the boundary? In Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 40 (ed. S. Kahn, C. Moore-Cantwell, and R. Staubs), pp. 93–106.Find this resource:

Michotte, Albert (1946). La perception de la causalité. Publications universitaires de Louvain, Louvain.Find this resource:

Mikolov, Tomas, Sutskever, Ilya, Chen, Kai, Corrado, Greg, and Dean, Jeff (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 (ed. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Weinberger), pp. 3111–19.Find this resource:

Milambiling, Lareina (2013). Tagalog verbs and situation aspect. Master’s thesis, Western University.Find this resource:

(p. 680) Miller, George and Johnson-Laird, Philip (1976). Language and Perception. Belknap Press / Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Milsark, Gary (1974). Existential Sentences in English. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Milsark, Gary (1977). Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3, 1–29.Find this resource:

Minsky, Marvin (1974). A framework for representing knowledge. Memo 306, MIT-AI Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Mintz, Mike, Bills, Steven, Snow, Rion, and Jurafsky, Dan (2009). Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 2, pp. 1003–11. ACL.Find this resource:

Mitchell, Jeff and Steedman, Mark (2015). Orthogonality of syntax and semantics within distributional spaces. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Beijing, pp. 1301–10. ACL.Find this resource:

Mitchell, Tom, Cohen, William, Hruschka, Estevam, Talukdar, Partha, Betteridge, Justin, Carlson, Andrew, Dalvi Mishra, Bhavana, Gardner, Matthew, Kisiel, Bryan, and Krishnamurthy, Jayant (2015). Never-ending learning. In Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2302–10.Find this resource:

Mithun, Marianne (1984). The evolution of noun incorporation. Language, 60, 847–94.Find this resource:

Mittwoch, Anita (1988). Aspects of English aspect: On the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, 11, 203–54.Find this resource:

Mittwoch, Anita (1991). In defence of Vendler’s achievements. In Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6: Perspectives on Aspect and Aktionsart (ed. C. Vetters and W. Vandeweghe), pp. 71–85. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Mittwoch, Anita (2005). Do states have Davidsonian arguments? Some empirical considerations. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications (ed. C. Maienborn and A. Wöllstein), pp. 69–88. Niemeyer, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Mittwoch, Anita (2010). Event measurement and containment. In Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure (ed. M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, and I. Sichel), pp. 253–66. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Mittwoch, Anita (2013). On the criteria for distinguishing accomplishments from activities, and two types of aspectual misfits. In Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates (ed. B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, and R. Marín), pp. 27–48. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Miyagawa, Shigeru (1984). Blocking and Japanese causatives. Lingua, 64, 177–207.Find this resource:

Miyagawa, Shigeru (1989). Structure and Case Marking in Japanese. Academic Press, New York.Find this resource:

Miyagawa, Shigeru (1998). (S)ase as an elsewhere causative and the syntactic nature of words. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 16, 67–110.Find this resource:

Moens, Marc (1987). Tense, Aspect, and Temporal Reference. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Find this resource:

Moens, Marc and Steedman, Mark (1987). Temporal ontology in natural language. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford, CA, July, pp. 1–7. Reprinted in Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), Semantics: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, Vol. IV: The Semantics of Predicates and Inflection, pp. 290–305. Routledge, Abingdon.Find this resource:

Moens, Marc and Steedman, Mark (1988). Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics, 14, 15–28. Reprinted in Inderjeet Mani, James Pustejovsky, and (p. 681) Robert Gaizauskas (eds.) The Language of Time: A Reader, pp. 93–114. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (1997). Parts and Wholes in Semantics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (2004). Properties and kinds of tropes: Linguistic facts and old philosophical insights. Mind, 113, 1–41.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (2007). Events, tropes and truthmaking. Philosophical Studies, 134, 363–403.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (2009). Degree structure as trope structure: A trope-based analysis of positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32, 51–94.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (2013a). Abstract Objects and the Semantics of Natural Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (2013b). On the distinction between abstract states, concrete states, and tropes. In Genericity (ed. A. Mari, C. Beyssade, and F. Del Prete), pp. 292–311. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (2014). Propositions, attitudinal objects, and the distinction between actions and products. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43, 679–701. Special issue on propositions, edited by G. Rattan and D. Hunter.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (2015). A truthmaker semantics for cases. Ms., New York University.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (2017). Cognitive products and the semantics of attitude verbs and deontic modals. In Act-Based Conceptions of Propositional Content: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives (ed. F. Moltmann and M. Textor), pp. 254–89. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Moltmann, Friederike (2018). On the ontology of cases. In De la passion du sens en linguistique: hommages à Danièle Van de Velde (ed. N. Flaux, P. Haas, V. Mostrov, K. Paykin, and F. Tayalatii), pp. 171–86. Les Presses Universitaires de Valenciennes, Valenciennes.Find this resource:

Montague, Richard (1970). English as a formal language. In Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica (ed. B. Visentini et al.), pp. 189–224. Edizioni di Communita, Milan. Reprinted (1974) in Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers (ed. R. Thomason), pp. 188–221. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Find this resource:

Montague, Richard (1973). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics (ed. J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes), pp. 221–42. Reidel, Dordrecht. Reprinted (1974) in Formal Philosophy (ed. R. Thomason), pp. 247–70. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Find this resource:

Moot, Richard (2012). Wide-coverage semantics for spatio-temporal reasoning. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 53, 115–42.Find this resource:

Moot, Richard and Retoré, Christian (2012). The Logic of Categorial Grammar: A Deductive Account of Natural Language Syntax and Semantics. Springer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Morgan, Jerry (1969). On arguing about semantics. Papers in Linguistics, 1, 49–70.Find this resource:

Moro, Andrea (2000). Dynamic Antisymmetry. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Moro, Andrea and Navigli, Roberto (2012). WiSeNet: Building a Wikipedia-based semantic network with ontologized relations. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1672–6. ACM.Find this resource:

Morrow, Daniel (1990). Spatial models, prepositions, and verb-aspect markers. Discourse Processes, 13, 441–69.Find this resource:

Motut, Alexandra (2010). A puzzle for the syntax–semantics of depictives. In Proceedings of the Canadian Linguistics Association (ed. M. Heijl).Find this resource:

Motut, Alexandra (2014). A semantics for object-oriented depictives. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20, pp. 241–50.Find this resource:

(p. 682) Mourelatos, Alexander (1978). Events, processes and states. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2, 415–34. Reprinted (1981) in Syntax and Semantics 14: Tense and Aspect (ed. P. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen), pp. 191–212. Academic Press, New York.Find this resource:

Muansuwan, Nuttanart (2001). Directional serial verb constructions in Thai. In Proceedings of the 7th International HPSG Conference (ed. D. Flickinger and A. Kathol), pp. 229–46. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Mueller-Reichau, Olav (2006). Sorting the World: On the Relevance of the Kind-Level/Object-Level Distinction to Referential Semantics. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Leipzig. Published in 2011 by Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.Find this resource:

Mueller-Reichau, Olav (2013). On Russian factual imperfectives. In Formal Description of Slavic Languages: The Ninth Conference. Proceedings of FDSL 9, Göttingen 2011 (ed. U. Junghanns, D. Fehrmann, D. Lenertová, and H. Pitsch), pp. 191–210. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.Find this resource:

Mueller-Reichau, Olav (2015). Pseudo-incorporation in Russian? Aspectual competition and bare singular interpretation. In The Syntax and Semantics of Pseudo-Incorporation (ed. O. Borik and B. Gehrke), pp. 262–95. Brill, Leiden.Find this resource:

Mueller-Reichau, Olav and Gehrke, Berit (2015). Event kind formation within the VP: Comparing Russian factual imperfectives and German adjectival passives. In Slavic Grammar from a Formal Perspective: The 10th Anniversary FDSL Conference, Leipzig 2013 (ed. G. Zybatow, P. Biskup, M. Guhl, C. Hurtig, O. Mueller-Reichau, and M. Yastrebowa), pp. 367–82. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.Find this resource:

Müller, Stefan (2008a). Depictive secondary predicates in German and English. In Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond (ed. C. Schroeder, G. Hentschel, and W. Boeder), pp. 255–73. BIS-Verlag, Oldenburg.Find this resource:

Müller, Stefan (2008b). Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Eine Einführung. Stauffenburg, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Müller-Bardey, Thomas (2005). Adverbials and depictives as restrictors. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification (ed. N. Himmelmann and E. Schultze-Berndt), pp. 107–40. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Mulligan, Kevin, Simons, Peter, and Smith, Barry (1984). Truth makers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 44, 287–321.Find this resource:

Mumford, Stephen and Anjum, Rani Lill (2011). Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Musan, Renate (1999). Temporal interpretation and information-status of noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 355–401.Find this resource:

Musan, Renate (2001). Narrowing down the Extended Now. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow (ed. C. Féry and W. Sternefeld), pp. 372–91. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.Find this resource:

Naigles, Letitia and Terrazas, Paula (1998). Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influence of language and syntax. Psychological Science, 9, 363–69.Find this resource:

Nakashole, Ndapandula, Weikum, Gerhard, and Suchanek, Fabian (2012). PATTY: A taxonomy of relational patterns with semantic types. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 1135–45. ACL.Find this resource:

Napoli, Donna Jo (1992). Secondary resultative predicates in Italian. Journal of Linguistics, 28, 53–90.Find this resource:

Narasimhan, Bhuvana (2003). Motion events and the lexicon: A case study of Hindi. Lingua, 113, 123–60.Find this resource:

(p. 683) Navigli, Roberto and Ponzetto, Simone Paolo (2012). BabelNet: The automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network. Artificial Intelligence, 193, 217–50.Find this resource:

Nedjalkov, Vladimir (1988). Typology of Resultative Constructions. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. Translated from Russian by Bernard Comrie.Find this resource:

Neelakantan, Arvind, Roth, Benjamin, and McCallum, Andrew (2015). Compositional vector space models for knowledge base completion. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Beijing, pp. 156–66. ACL.Find this resource:

Neville, Helen, Nicol, Janet, Barss, Andrew, Forster, Kenneth, and Garrett, Merrill (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151–65.Find this resource:

Newell, Heather and Piggott, Glyne (2014). Interactions at the syntax–phonology interface: Evidence from Ojibwe. Lingua, 150, 332–62.Find this resource:

Newmeyer, Frederick (2002). Optimality and functionality: A critique of functionally-based optimality-theoretic syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20, 43–80.Find this resource:

Nichols, Johanna (1978). Secondary predicates. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (ed. J. Jaeger, A. Woodbury, F. Ackerman, C. Chiarello, O. Gensler, J. Kingston, E. Sweetser, H. Thompson, and K. Whitler), pp. 114–27.Find this resource:

Nichols, Lynn (2008). Lexical semantic constraints on noun roots and noun borrowability. Studies in Language, 32, 683–700.Find this resource:

Nikitina, Tatiana (2008). Pragmatic factors and variation in the expression of spatial goals: The case of into vs. in. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P (ed. A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke, and R. Nouwen), pp. 175–209. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Nikitina, Tatiana (2010). Variation in the encoding of endpoints of motion in Russian. In New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion (ed. V. Hasko and R. Perelmutter), pp. 267–90. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Nilsen, Don Lee Fred (1973). The Instrumental Case in English. Mouton, The Hague.Find this resource:

Noonan, Michael (2003). Motion events in Chantyal. In Motion, Direction and Location in Languages: In Honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (ed. E. Shay and U. Seibert), pp. 211–34. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan, and Wasow, Thomas (1994). Idioms. Language, 70>, 491–538.Find this resource:

Oehrle, Richard (1976). The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Ogihara, Toshiyuki (1998). Tense, aspect, and argument structure. In Proceedings of SALT 8, pp. 169–84. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Osterhout, Lee and Holcomb, Phillip (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 758–806.Find this resource:

Osterhout, Lee, Holcomb, Phillip, and Swinney, David (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 786–803.Find this resource:

Özçalışkan, Şeida (2009). Learning to talk about spatial motion in language-specific ways. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (ed. J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, and Ş. Özçalışkan), pp. 263–76. Psychology Press, New York.Find this resource:

Pace, Amy, Carver, Leslie, and Friend, Margaret (2013). Event-related potentials to intact and disrupted actions in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 453–70.Find this resource:

(p. 684) Paczynski, Martin and Kuperberg, Gina (2011). Electrophysiological evidence for use of the animacy hierarchy, but not thematic role assignment, during verb-argument processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1402–56.Find this resource:

Paczynski, Martin and Kuperberg, Gina (2012). Multiple influences of semantic memory on sentence processing: Distinct effects of semantic relatedness on violations of real-world event/ state knowledge and animacy selection restrictions. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 426–48.Find this resource:

Paczynski, Martin, Jackendoff, Ray, and Kuperberg, Gina (2014). When events change their nature: The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1905–17.Find this resource:

Padó, Sebastian and Lapata, Mirella (2007). Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33, 161–99.Find this resource:

Padučeva, Elena Viktorovna (1996). Semantičeskie Issledovanija. Škola ‘Jazyki russkoj kul’turoj’, Moscow.Find this resource:

Papafragou, Anna, Massey, Christine, and Gleitman, Lila (2002). Shake, rattle, ’n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219.Find this resource:

Papafragou, Anna, Massey, Christine, and Gleitman, Lila (2006). When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition, 98, B75–B87.Find this resource:

Parsons, Terence (1985). Underlying events in the logical analysis of English. In Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (ed. E. LePore and B. McLaughlin), pp. 235–67. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

Parsons, Terence (1990). Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Parsons, Terence (1993). Thematic relations and arguments. Ms., University of California, Irvine.Find this resource:

Parsons, Terence (1995). Thematic relations and arguments. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 635–62.Find this resource:

Parsons, Terence (2000). Underlying states and time travel. In Speaking of Events (ed. J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. Varzi), pp. 81–93. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Partee, Barbara (1973). Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy, 70, 601–9.Find this resource:

Partee, Barbara (1984). Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, 243–86.Find this resource:

Partee, Barbara (1987). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalised Quantifiers (ed. J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof), pp. 115–43. Foris, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Patel, Aniruddh (2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 674–81.Find this resource:

Patel, Aniruddh, Gibson, Edward, Ratner, Jennifer, Besson, Mireille, and Holcomb, Phillip (1998). Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 717–33.Find this resource:

Paul, Hermann (1898). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Niemeyer, Halle a. S.Find this resource:

Paul, Ileana, Ralalaoherivony, Baholisoa Simone, and de Swart, Henriëtte (2014). Lexical vs. grammatical aspect in Malagasy: Telicity, achievements and the perfect. Paper presented at Chronos, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.Find this resource:

Paul, Ileana, Ralalaoherivony, Baholisoa Simone, and de Swart, Henriëtte (2015). Aspect and modality in Malagasy maha-. In Proceedings of the Canadian Linguistic Association (CLA) (ed. S. Vīnerte). http://cla-acl.ca/actes-2015-proceedings/ (accessed 27 August 2018).Find this resource:

(p. 685) Paul, Ileana, Ralalaoherivony, Baholisoa Simone, and de Swart, Henriëtte (2016). Malagasy maha at the crossroads of voice, causation and modality. In Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistics Society 42 (ed. E. Clem, V. Dawson, A. Shen, A. Horan Skilton, G. Bacon, A. Cheng, and E. H. Maier), pp. 353–67.Find this resource:

Pearl, Judea (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Pearson, Matthew (2000). Two types of VO languages. In The Derivation of VO and OV (ed. P. Svenonius), pp. 327–63. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Pearson, Matthew (2012). Aspect and voice selection in Malagasy: Initial observations. In Theories of Everything: In Honor of Ed Keenan (ed. T. Graf, D. Paperno, A. Szabolcsi, and J. Tellings), pp. 337–47. UCLA Department of Linguistics, Los Angeles, CA.Find this resource:

Pedersen, Johan (2009). The construction of macro-events: A typological perspective. In Deconstructing Constructions (ed. C. Butler and J. M. Arista), pp. 25–62. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Pedersen, Johan (2014). Variable type framing in Spanish constructions of directed motion. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar (ed. H. Boas and F. Gonzálvez-García), pp. 269–304. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (2009). Kinds, Things, and Stuff: Mass Terms and Generics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Perlmutter, David (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 157–89.Find this resource:

Pesetsky, David (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Peters, Stanley and Westerståhl, Dag (2006). Quantifiers in Language and Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Peterson, Philip (1997). Fact, Proposition, Event. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Phillips, Vivianne (2000). The interaction between prefix and root: The case of maha- in Malagasy. In Formal Issues in Austronesian Linguistics (ed. I. Paul, V. Phillips, and L. deM. Travis), pp. 85–104. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Pianesi, Fabio and Varzi, Achille (2000). Events and event talk: An introduction. In Speaking of Events (ed. J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. Varzi), pp. 3–47. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Pietroski, Paul (2000). Causing Actions. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Pietroski, Paul (2005). Events and Semantic Architecture. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Pietroski, Paul (2011). Minimal semantic instructions. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (ed. C. Boeckx), pp. 472–98. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven (1989). Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Piñón, Christopher (1997). Achievements in an event semantics. In SALT VII (ed. A. Lawson), pp. 276–93. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Piñón, Christopher (2001). A finer look at the causative–inchoative alternation. In SALT XI (ed. R. Hastings, B. Jackson, and Z. Zvolenszky), pp. 346–64. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Piñón, Christopher (2008). Aspectual composition with degrees. In Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse (ed. L. McNally and C. Kennedy), pp. 183–219. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Pires de Oliveira, Roberta (2013). Weak (in)definiteness and referentiality. Revista da ABRALIN, 12, 1–37.Find this resource:

Poesio, Massimo (1994). Weak definites. In Proceedings of SALT 4 (ed. M. Harvey and L. Santelmann), pp. 282–99. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

(p. 686) Poon, Hoifung and Domingos, Pedro (2008). Joint unsupervised coreference resolution with Markov logic. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Honolulu, HI, pp. 650–9. ACL.Find this resource:

Portner, Paul (2003). The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 459–510.Find this resource:

Portner, Paul (2009). Modality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Potashnik, Joseph (2014). Scalarity and Unaccusativity at the Lexicon–Syntax Interface. Ph.D. thesis, Tel Aviv University.Find this resource:

Potts, Christopher (2008). Review article: Structuring Sense, vol. 1: In Name Only; Structuring Sense, vol. 2: The Normal Course of Events, by Hagit Borer. Language, 82, 348–69.Find this resource:

Poutsma, Hendrik (1926). A Grammar of Late Modern English. Part II: The Parts of Speech. Noordhoff, Groningen.Find this resource:

Prior, Arthur (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Pross, Tillmann (2016). Mono-eventive verbs of emission and their bi-eventive nominalizations. In Procedings of NELS 45 (ed. T. Bui and D. Özyıldız), pp. 257–66.Find this resource:

Pross, Tillmann and Roßdeutscher, Antje (2015). Representing force dynamics at the syntax–semantics interface. Paper presented at the workshop on ‘Formal Semantics Meets Cognitive Semantics’, Nijmegen. http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/institut/mitarbeiter/prosstn/files/force.pdf (accessed 27 August 2018).Find this resource:

Proverbio, Alice, Crotti, Nicola, Manfredi, Mirella, Adorni, Roberto, and Zani, Alberto (2012). Who needs a referee? How incorrect basketball actions are automatically detected by basketball players’ brain. Scientific Reports, 2, 1–8.Find this resource:

Puig Waldmüller, Estela (2008). Contracted Preposition–Determiner Forms in German: Semantics and Pragmatics. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, James (1989). The geometry of events. In Generative Approaches to Aspect (ed. C. Tenny), pp. 19–40. MIT Lexicon Project, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, James (1991). The syntax of event structure. Cognition, 41, 47–81.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, James (1995). The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, James and Bouillon, Pierrette (1995). Aspectual coercion and logical polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 12, 133–62.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, James, Casteño, José, Ingria, Robert, Saurí, Roser, Gaizauiuskas, Robert, Setzer, Andrea, Katz, Graham, and Radev, Dragomir (2003a). TimeML: Robust specification of event and temporal expressions in text. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg. AAAI. As TR-SS-03-07.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, James, Hanks, Patrick, Saurí, Roser, See, Andrew, Day, David, Ferro, Lisa, Gaizauiuskas, Robert, Lazo, Marcia, Setzer, Andrea, and Sundheim, Beth (2003b). The TimeBank corpus. In Proceedings of the Conference on Corpus Linguistics, pp. 647–56. University of Lancaster.Find this resource:

Pylkkänen, Liina (1999). Causation and external arguments. In Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on the Lexicon (ed. L. Pylkkänen, A. van Hout, and H. Harley), pp. 161–83. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Pylkkänen, Liina (2002). Introducing Arguments. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Pylkkänen, Liina (2008). Introducing Arguments. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Qing, Ciyang and Franke, Michael (2014). Gradable adjectives, vagueness, and optimal language use: A speaker-oriented model. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 24 (ed. L. Champollion and A. Szabolcsi), pp. 23–41.Find this resource:

(p. 687) Rabenilaina, Roger-Bruno (1985). Lexique–grammaire du malgache. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 7.Find this resource:

Rajemisa-Raolison, Régis (1971). Grammaire malgache. Centre de formation pédagogique, Fianarantsoa.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (1996). Two subject positions in Scottish Gaelic: The syntax–semantics interface. Natural Language Semantics, 4, 165–91.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (1997). Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (1998). Deconstructing the lexicon. In The Projection of Arguments (ed. M. Butt and W. Geuder), pp. 65–96. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (2005). Post-davidsonianism. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 359–73.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (2007). Events in syntax: Modification and predication. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 476–97.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (2008a). Lexical items in complex predications: Selection as underassociation. Nordlyd Tromsø: Working Papers on Languages and Linguistics, 35, 115–41.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (2008b). Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (2011). Minimalist semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (ed. C. Boeckx), pp. 449–71. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (2013). Argument structure and argument structure alternations. In Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax (ed. M. den Dikken). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (2014a). Causal chains and instrumental case in Hindi/Urdu. In Causation in Grammatical Structures (ed. B. Copley and F. Martin), pp. 245–78. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (2014b). Stativity and present tense epistemics. In Proceedings of SALT 24 (ed. T. Snider, S. D’Antonio, and M. Weigand), pp. 102–21.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian (2018). Situations and Syntactic Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Ramchand, Gillian and Svenonius, Peter (2002). The lexical syntax and lexical semantics of the verb–particle construction. In Proceedings of WCCFL 21 (ed. L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts). Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.Find this resource:

Rapoport, Tova (1986). Nonverbal predication in Hebrew. In Proceedings of WCCFL V,(ed. M. Dalrymple, J. Goldberg, K. Hanson, M. Inman, C. Piñon, and S. Wechsler), pp. 207–18. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Rapoport, Tova (1987). Copular, Nominal, and Small Clauses. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Rapoport, Tova (1990). Secondary predication and the lexical representation of verbs. Machine Translation, 5, 31–55. Special issue on Lexical Semantics, part 1.Find this resource:

Rapoport, Tova (1991). Adjunct-predicate licensing and D-structure. In Syntax and Semantics 25. Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing (ed. S. Rothstein), pp. 159–87. Academic Press, New York.Find this resource:

Rapoport, Tova (1993). Stage and adjunct predicates: Licensing and structure in secondary predication constructions. In Knowledge and Language, Volume II: Lexical and Conceptual Structure (ed. E. Reuland and W. Abraham), pp. 157–82. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Rapoport, Tova (1999). Structure, aspect and the predicate. Language, 75, 653–76.Find this resource:

Rapoport, Tova (2014). Verb meaning and context: A criticism of manner–result complementarity. In Autour du verbe anglais: construction, lexique, evidentialité (ed. G. Girard-Gillet), pp. 121–37. Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris.Find this resource:

(p. 688) Rapoport, Tova (2015). Secondary predication: Aspects of resultatives and depictives. Talk given at the Catalonia–Israel Symposium, The Hebrew University.Find this resource:

Rapp, Irene (1996). Zustand? Passiv? Überlegungen zum sogenannten ‘Zustandspassiv’. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 15, 231–65.Find this resource:

Rapp, Irene (1997). Partizipien und semantische Strukur: Zu passivischen Konstruktionen mit dem 3. Status. Stauffenburg, Tübingen.Find this resource:

Rapp, Irene and von Stechow, Armin (1999). Fast ‘almost’ and the visibility parameter for D-adverbs. Journal of Semantics, 16, 149–204.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2008). Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect (ed. S. Rothstein), pp. 13–42. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2014a). Building scalar changes. In The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax (ed. A. Alexiadou, H. Borer, and F. Schäfer), pp. 259–81. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, Malka (2014b). Lexical content and context: The causative alternation in English revisited. Lingua, 142, 8–29.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth (1998). Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors (ed. M. Butt and W. Geuder), pp. 97–134. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth (2001). An event structure account of English resultatives. Language, 77, 766–97.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth (2007). Deconstructing thematic hierarchies. In Architectures, Rules and Preferences: Variations on Themes by Joan Bresnan (ed. A. Zaenen, J. Simpson, T. Holloway King, J. Grimshaw, J. Maling, and C. Manning), pp. 385–402. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth (2010). Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure (ed. M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, and I. Sichel), pp. 21–38. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth (2012). Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface (ed. M. Everaert, M. Marelj, and T. Siloni), pp. 150–76. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Rathert, Monika (2001). Anteriority versus Extended Now: Theories of the German perfect. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow (ed. C. Féry and W. Sternefeld), pp. 410–26. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.Find this resource:

Reddy, Siva, Lapata, Mirella, and Steedman, Mark (2014). Large-scale semantic parsing without question–answer pairs. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2, 377–92.Find this resource:

Reichenbach, Hans (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. Macmillan, New York.Find this resource:

Reid, Vincent and Striano, Tricia (2008). N400 involvement in the processing of action sequences. Neuroscience Letters, 433, 93–7.Find this resource:

Reid, Vincent, Hoehl, Stefanie, Grigutsch, Maren, Groendahl, Anna, Parise, Eugenio, and Striano, Tricia (2009). The neural correlates of infant and adult goal prediction: Evidence for semantic processing systems. Developmental Psychology, 45, 620–9.Find this resource:

Reinhart, Tanya (1997). Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 335–97.Find this resource:

Reinhart, Tanya (2000). The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS working papers in linguistics 00,01/TL.Find this resource:

(p. 689) Reinhart, Tanya (2002). The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics, 28, 229–90.Find this resource:

Reinhart, Tanya and Siloni, Tal (2004). Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle (ed. A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, and M. Everaert), pp. 159–80. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Reinhart, Tanya and Siloni, Tal (2005). The lexicon–syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 389–436.Find this resource:

Restall, Greg (1996). Truthmakers, entailment, and necessity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74, 331–40.Find this resource:

Reyle, Uwe, Roßdeutscher, Antje, and Kamp, Hans (2007). Ups and downs in the theory of temporal reference. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 565–635.Find this resource:

Richards, Norvin (2010). Uttering Trees. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Ritter, Elizabeth and Rosen, Sara Thomas (1998). Delimiting events in syntax. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors (ed. M. Butt and W. Geuder), pp. 135–64. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Ritter, Elizabeth and Rosen, Sara Thomas (2000). Event structure and ergativity. In Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Syntax and Lexical Semantics (ed. C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky), pp. 187–238. CSLI, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Roberts, Craige (1998). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49: Papers in Semantics (1996) (ed. J. H. Yoon and A. Kathol), pp. 91–136. Ohio State University. Revised version as of Sept. 1998.Find this resource:

Robles-De-La-Torre, Gabriel and Hayward, Vincent (2001). Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature, 412, 445–8.Find this resource:

Rodríguez Arrizabalaga, Beatriz (2004). The attributive system in English and Spanish: Contrasts in expressing change of state. Languages in Contrast, 4, 233–59.Find this resource:

Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo (2005). Why truthmakers. In Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate (ed. H. Beebee and J. Dodd), pp. 17–31. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Roeper, Thomas (1987). Implicit arguments and the head–complement relation. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 267–310.Find this resource:

Rohde, Hannah, Kehler, Andrew, and Elman, Jeffrey (2006). Event structure and discourse coherence biases in pronoun interpretation. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 697–702.Find this resource:

Rohde, Hannah, Kehler, Andrew, and Elman, Jeffrey (2007). Pronoun interpretation as a side effect of discourse coherence. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 617–22.Find this resource:

Rosen, Sara Thomas (1999). The syntactic representation of linguistic events. Glot International, 4, 3–11.Find this resource:

Ross, John Robert (1972). Act. In Semantics of Natural Language (ed. D. Davidson and G. Harman), pp. 70–126. Reidel, Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Roßdeutscher, Antje and Kamp, Hans (2010). Syntactic and semantic constraints in the formation and interpretation of ung-nouns. In The Semantics of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks (ed. A. Alexiadou and M. Rathert), pp. 169–214. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Rothmayr, Antonia (2009). The Structure of Stative Verbs. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Rothstein, Susan (1983). The Syntactic Forms of Predication. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Rothstein, Susan (2003). Secondary predication and aspectual structure. In Modifying Adjuncts (ed. E. Lang, C. Maienborn, and C. Fabricius-Hansen), pp. 553–90. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Rothstein, Susan (2004). Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

(p. 690) Rothstein, Susan (2005). States and modification: A reply to Maienborn. Theoretical Linguistics, 31, 375–81.Find this resource:

Rothstein, Susan (2006). Secondary predication. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume 4 (ed. M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdjik), pp. 209–33. Blackwell, Oxford.Find this resource:

Rothstein, Susan (2008a). Telicity, atomicity and the Vendler classification of verbs. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect (ed. S. Rothstein), pp. 43–78. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Rothstein, Susan (2008b). Two puzzles for a theory of lexical aspect: The case of semelfactives and degree adverbials. In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation (ed. J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow, and M. Schäfer), pp. 175–98. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Find this resource:

Rothstein, Susan (2011). Another look at accomplishments and incrementality. In Telicity, Change, State: A Cross-categorial View of Event Structure (ed. V. Demonte and L. McNally), pp. 60–102. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Rothstein, Susan (2014). On the scope of aspectual operators. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 22: The McMaster Meeting 2013, Ann Arbor, MI. Michigan Slavic Publications.Find this resource:

Rotstein, Carmen and Winter, Yoad (2004). Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics, 12, 259–88.Find this resource:

Roy, Isabelle (2013). Nonverbal Predication: Copular Sentences at the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Roy, Isabelle and Soare, Elena (2013). Event-related nominals. In Categorization and Category Change (ed. G. Iordăchioaia, I. Roy, and K. Takamine), pp. 123–52. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.Find this resource:

Roy, Isabelle and Svenonius, Peter (2009). Complex prepositions. In Autour de la préposition. Actes du Colloque International de Caen (20–22 septembre 2007), pp. 105–16. Presses Universitaires de Caen, Caen.Find this resource:

Rozenblit, Leonid and Keil, Frank (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–62.Find this resource:

Runeson, Sverker and Frykholm, Gunilla (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 733–40.Find this resource: