Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 20 May 2019

(p. 1009) References

(p. 1009) References

Aarts, Bas (2007) Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Abdulaev, Yalichin G., and Michael I. Posner (1997) Time-course of activating brain areas in generating verbal associations. Psychological Science 8: 56–9.Find this resource:

Abeillé, Anne (ed.) (2003) Treebanks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Find this resource:

Abels, Klaus (2007) Towards a restrictive theory of (remnant) movement. In Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck (ed.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2007, pp. 53–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Abney, Steven P. (1987) The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch (2004) The Morphosyntax of Complement-Head Sequences. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch (2007) Information structuring begins with numeration. Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC), University of Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Aboitiz, F. (2012) Gestures, vocalizations and memory in language origins. Frontiers in Evolu-tionary Neuroscience 4.Find this resource:

Adamson, H. D. (1992) Social and processing constraints on relative clauses. American Speech 67: 123–33.Find this resource:

Adger, David (2003) Core Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ágel, Vilmos (2000) Valenztheorie. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

Ágel, Vilmos (2001) Gegenwartsgrammatik und Sprachgeschichte: methodologische Überlegungen am Beispiel der Serialisierung im Verbalkomplex. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 29: 319–31.Find this resource:

Ágel, Vilmos (2004) Phraseologismus als (valenz)syntaktischer Normalfall. In Kathrin Steyer (ed.), Wortverbindungen—mehr oder weniger fest. Jahrbuch 2003 des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache, pp. 65–85. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Ágel, Vilmos (2006) (Nicht)Flexion des Substantiv(s) Neue Überlegungen zum finiten Substantiv. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 34: 286–327.Find this resource:

Ágel, Vilmos, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans-Jürgen Heringer, and Henning Lobin (eds.) (2003) Handbook of Dependency and Valency, vol. 1. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Ágel, Vilmos, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Peter Hellwig, Hans-Jürgen Heringer, and Henning Lobin (eds.) (2006) Handbook of Dependency and Valency, vol. 2. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Ahern, Aoife, and Manuel Leonetti (2004) The Spanish subjunctive: procedural semantics and pragmatic inference. In R. Márquez-Reiter and M.E. Placencia (eds.), Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, pp. 35–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Aijmer, Karin (2002) English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (p. 1010) Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2003) A Grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Aissen, Judith (1999) Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711.Find this resource:

Aissen, Judith (2003) Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–83.Find this resource:

Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz (1935) Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosphica 1: 1–27. Translated in Storrs McCall (ed.), Polish Logic: 1 9201 93 9, pp. 207–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.Find this resource:

Akhtar, Nameera, and Michael Tomasello (1997) Young children’s productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology 33: 952–65.Find this resource:

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi (2011) Featural affixes. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Volume IV, pp. 1945–71. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Find this resource:

Aksu-Koç, Ayhan, and Dan I. Slobin (1985) The acquisition of Turkish. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 2: The data, pp. 839–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Aksu-Koç, Ayhan, and Didem Mersin Alici (2000) Understanding sources of beliefs and marking of uncertainty: the child’s theory of evidentiality. In Eve V. Clark (ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Child Language Research Forum, pp. 123–30. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Alfonso, Peter J., and Thomas Baer (1982) Dynamics of vowel articulation. Language and Speech 25: 151–73.Find this resource:

Alishahi, Afra, and Suzanne Stevenson (2008) A computational model for early argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science 32: 5.Find this resource:

Allen, Cynthia (1995) Case-Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Alon, Uri (2003) Biological networks: the tinkerer as an engineer. Science 301: 1866–7.Find this resource:

Alon, Uri (2007) Simplicity in biology. Nature 446: 497.Find this resource:

Alsina, Alex (1996) The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Altenberg, Bengt (1998) On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In A. Cowie (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications, pp. 101–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Altenberg, Bengt, and Mats Eeg-Olofsson (1990) Phraseology in spoken English. In Jan Aarts and Willem Meijs (eds.), Theory and Practice in Corpus Linguistics, pp. 1–26. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Find this resource:

Altmann G.T.M., and Y. Kamide (2009) Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye movements and mental representation. Cognition 111: 55–71.Find this resource:

Ambridge, Ben, Caroline Rowland, and Julian Pine (2008) Is structure dependence an innate constraint? New experimental evidence from chilren’s complex-question production. Cognitive Science 32: 222–55.Find this resource:

Amha, Azeb (2001) The Maale Language. Leiden: University of Leiden, Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies.Find this resource:

Amiot, Dany (2005) Between compounding and derivation: elements of word formation corresponding to prepositions. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, and Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its Demarcations, pp. 81–96. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (p. 1011) Find this resource:

Ananthakrishnan, G., and Olov Engwall (2011) Mapping between acoustic and articulatory gestures. Speech Communication 53: 567–89.Find this resource:

Andersen, Roger W. (1979) Explaining Schumann’s Pidginization Hypothesis. Language Learning 29, 1: 105–19.Find this resource:

Anderson, Sarah E., Teenie Matlock, Caitlin M. Fausey, and Michael J. Spivey (2008) On the path to understanding the on-line processing of grammatical aspect. In Vladimir Sloutsky, Bradley Love, and Ken McRae (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2253–8. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Find this resource:

Anderson, Sarah E., Teenie Matlock, and Michael J. Spivey (2010) The role of grammatical aspect in the dynamics of spatial descriptions. In Christoph Hölscher, Thomas F. Shipley, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli, John A. Bateman, and Nora S. Newcombe (eds.), Spatial Cognition VII, pp. 139–51. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Find this resource:

Amundson, Ron (2005) The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, John M. (1971) The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, John R. (1978) Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review 85: 249–77.Find this resource:

Anderson, John R. (1993) Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1992) A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1999) A formalist’s reading of some functionalist work in syntax. In Darnell et al. (1999: 111–35).Find this resource:

Andersson, Peter (2006) Swedish and the (de)grammaticalization debate. TS, Institutionen för svenska språket, Göteborgs Universitet.Find this resource:

Andrews, Avery (1990) Unification and morphological blocking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 507–57.Find this resource:

Andrews, Avery (2007) The major functions of the noun phrase. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 1: Clause Structure, 2nd edn, pp. 132–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Anonymous (ed.) (1923) Antidoron: Festschrift Jacob Wackernagel zur Vollendung des 70. Leben-sjahres gewidmet von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Find this resource:

Anttila, Arto (2002) Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 1–42.Find this resource:

Arbib, M.A. (1981) Perceptual structures and distributed motor control In V. B. Brooks (ed.), Handbook of Physiology — The Nervous System II. Motor Control, pp. 1449–80. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. (1989) The Metaphorical Brain 2: Neural Networks and Beyond. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. (2012) How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A., and D. Caplan (1979) Neurolinguistics must be Computational. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2: 449–83.Find this resource:

Arbib, M, A., and J. Y. Lee (2008) Describing visual scenes: towards a neurolinguistics based on construction grammar. Brain Research 1225: 146–62.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A., D. N. Caplan, and J. C. Marshall (1982) Neurolinguistics in Historical Perspective In M. A. Arbib, D. Caplan, J. C. Marshall (eds.), Neural Models of Language Processes, pp. 5–24. New York: Academic Press. (p. 1012) Find this resource:

Arbib, M.A., E. J. Conklin, and J. C. Hill (1987) From Schema Theory to Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A., P. Érdi, and J. Szentágothai (1998) Neural Organization: Structure, Function, and Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A., A. Billard, M. Iacoboni, and E. Oztop (2000) Synthetic brain imaging: grasping, mirror neurons and imitation. Neural Networks 13: 975–97.Find this resource:

Archangeli, Diana (1984) Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

Archangeli, Diana (1985) Yokuts harmony: Evidence for coplanar representation in nonlinear phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 335–72.Find this resource:

Archangeli, Diana (1988) Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5: 183–207.Find this resource:

Archangeli, Diana, and D. Terence Langendoen (1997) Optimality Theory: An Overview. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Ariel, Mira (2004) Most. Language 80: 658–706.Find this resource:

Ariel, Mira (2006) A ‘just that’ lexical meaning for most. In von Heusinger and Turner (2006: 49–91).Find this resource:

Arka, I. Wayan, and J. Kosmas (2005) Passive without passive morphology? Evidence from Manggarai. In I. W. Arka and M. D. Ross (eds.), The Many Faces of Austronesian Voice Systems: Some New Empirical Studies, pp. 87–117. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Armstrong, David F., William C. Stokoe, and Sherman E. Wilcox (1995) Gesture and the Nature of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Armstrong, David F., and Sherman E. Wilcox (2007) The Gestural Origin of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Armstrong, Elizabeth (2001) Connecting lexical patterns of verb usage with discourse meanings in aphasia. Aphasiology 15: 1029–46.Find this resource:

Arnold, Doug, and Evita Linardaki (2007) Linguistic constraints in LFG-DOP. In Butt and King (2007: 66–86).Find this resource:

Arnon, Inbal (2011) Units of learning in language acquisition. In I. Arnon and E. V. Clark (eds.), Experience, Variation and Generalization: Learning a First Language, pp. 167–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Arnon, Inbal, and Eve V. Clark (2011) Why ‘Brush your teeth’ is better than ‘Teeth’: children’s word production is facilitated in familiar sentence-frames. Language Learning and Development 7: 107–29.Find this resource:

Arnon, Inbal, and Neal Snider (2010) More than words: frequency effects for multiword phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62: 67–82.Find this resource:

Arnon, Inbal, Neal Snider, Philip Hofmeister, T. Florian Jaeger, and Ivan A. Sag (2006) Cross-linguistic variation in a processing account: the case of multiple wh-questions. Berkeley Linguistics Society 32.Find this resource:

Aronoff, Mark (1976) Word Formation in Gernative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Aronoff, Mark (1994) Morphology By Itself: Stems And Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Aronoff, Mark, and Janie Rees-Miller (eds.) (2000) The Handbook of Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Aronoff, Mark, and Janie Rees-Miller (eds.) (2006) The Handbook of Linguistics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Asbury, Anna, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke, and Rick Nouwen (eds.) (2008) Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (p. 1013) Find this resource:

Ashton, Ethel O. (1944) Swahili Grammar (including Intonation) London: Longman.Find this resource:

Asudeh, Ash (2004) Resumption as resource management. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Find this resource:

Asudeh, Ash (2006) Direct compositionality and the architecture of LFG. In Butt and King (2006: 363–87).Find this resource:

Asudeh, Ash, and Richard Crouch (2002) Glue semantics for HPSG. In Frank van Eynde, Lars Hellan, and Dorothee Beermann (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International HPSG Con-ference, pp. 1–19. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Asudeh, Ash, Mary Dalrymple, and Ida Toivonen (2008) Constructions with lexical integrity: templates as the lexicon-syntax interface. In Butt and King (2008: 68–88).Find this resource:

Atkinson, Dwight (1992) The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: the case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal. Applied Linguistics 13: 337–74.Find this resource:

Atkinson, Dwight (1996) The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675– 1975: a sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 25: 333–71.Find this resource:

Atkinson, Dwight (1999) Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Atkinson, Richard C., and Richard M. Shiffrin (1968) Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In Kenneth W. Spence and Janet T. Spence (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 2, pp. 89–195. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Atlas, Jay David (1977) Negation, ambiguity, and presupposition. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 321–36.Find this resource:

Atlas, Jay David (1979) How linguistics matters to philosophy: presupposition, truth, and meaning. In C.-K. Oh and D. A. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11, pp. 265–81. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Atlas, Jay David (2005) Logic, Meaning, and Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Atlas, Jay David (2006) Remarks on F. Recanati’s Literal Meaning. MS.Find this resource:

Atlas, Jay David, and Stephen C. Levinson (1981) It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: radical pragmatics. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 1–61. London: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Au, Terry Kit-Fong (1983) Chinese and English counterfactuals: the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis revisited. Cognition 15: 155–87.Find this resource:

Au, Terry Kit-Fong (1984) Counterfactuals: in reply to Alfred Bloom. Cognition 17: 289–302.Find this resource:

Austin, Gavin (2008) The indefinite article in Sinhala: implications for a constraint-based analysis. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS 2008, Yonsei University, Korea).Find this resource:

Austin, John (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald (1992) Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearboook of Morphology 1991, pp. 109–50. New York: Springer.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald (2008a) Corpus linguistics in morphology: morphological productivity. In Anke Lüdeling, M. Kyto, and T. McEnery (eds.), Handbook of Corpus Linguistic. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald (2008b) Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald, Ton Dijkstra, and Rob Schreuder (1997) Singulars and plurals in Dutch: evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language 36: 94–117.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald, and Robert Schreuder (eds.) (2003) Morphological Structure in Language Processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bach, Emmon (2004) Linguistic universals and particulars. In Piet van Sterkenburg (ed.), Linguistics Today: Facing a Greater Challenge, pp. 47–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (p. 1014) Find this resource:

Bach, Kent (1994) Semantic slack: what is said and more. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, pp. 267–91. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Bach, Kent (2004a) Minding the gap. In C. Bianchi (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction, pp. 27–43. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Bach, Kent (2004b) Pragmatics and the philosophy of language. In Horn and Ward (2006: 463–87).Find this resource:

Bach, Kent (2006a) The excluded middle: semantic minimalism without minimal propositions. Phillosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 435–42.Find this resource:

Bach, Kent (2006b) The top ten misconceptions about implicature. In B. J. Birner and G. Ward (eds.), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew, and Dunstan Brown (2005) Case syncretism. In WALS, pp. 118–21.Find this resource:

Baertsch, Karen (2002. An Optimality-theoretic approach to syllable structure: the Split Margin Hierarchy. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Find this resource:

Bailey, David, Nancy Chang, Jerome Feldman, and Srini Narayanan (1998) Extending embodied lexical development. In Morton Ann Gernsbacher and Sharon J. Derry (eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (COGSCI-98), pp. 84–90. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Baker, Charlotte, and Dennis Cokely (1980) American Sign Language: A Teacher’s Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. Silver Spring, MD: T.J. Publishers.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (1985) The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–416.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (1988) Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (1996) The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2001) The Atoms of language: The Mind’s Hidden Rules of Grammar. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2003) Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2008a) The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2008b) The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation, pp. 351–74. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C., Kyle Johnson, and Ian Roberts (1989) Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–51.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C., and James McCloskey (2007) On the relationship of typology to theoretical syntax. Linguistic Typology 11: 285–96.Find this resource:

Baker, Philip, and Anand Syea (eds.) (1996) Changing Meanings, Changing Functions: Papers Relating to Grammaticalization in Contact Languages. London: University of Westminster Press.Find this resource:

Bakker, Dik (2011) Language sampling. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology, 90–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baković, Eric (1998) Unbounded stress and factorial typology. In Ron Artstein and Madeleine Holler (eds.), Ruling Papers 1: Working Papers from Rutgers University, pp. 15–28. New Brunswick, NJ: Dept of Linguistics, Rutgers University.Find this resource:

Baković, Eric (2005) Antigemination, assimilation and the determination of identity. Phonology 22: 279–315.Find this resource:

Bandettini, P. A. (2012) Twenty years of functional MRI: the science and the stories (Opening paper of a Special Issue). Neuroimage 62: 575–88. (p. 1015) Find this resource:

Bannard, Colin, and Elena Lieven (2009) Repetition and reuse in child language learning. In R. Corrigan, E. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, and K. Wheatley (eds.), Formulaic Language: Vol. 2. Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, Functional Explanations, pp. 297–321. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bannard, Colin, and Elena Lieven (2012) Formulaic language in L1 acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 3–16.Find this resource:

Bannard, Colin, and Danielle Matthews (2008) Stored sequences in language learning: the effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19: 241–8.Find this resource:

Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (1953) A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic description. Language 29: 47–58.Find this resource:

Barbieri, Maria Silvia, and Elisabetta Bascelli (2000) Comprehension of epistemic and deontic verbal modalities during development. Giornale italiano di psicologia 27: 529–48.Find this resource:

Barbosa, Pilar, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, and David Pesetsky (1998) Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Barlow, Michael, and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.) (2000) Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Baron-Cohen, Simon (1995) Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Baron-Cohen, Simon (2000) The evolution of a theory of mind. In Michael Corballis and Stephen E. G. Lea (eds.), The Descent of Mind: Psychological Perspectives on Hominid Evolution, pp. 261–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Barrès, V. and J. Lee (2014) Template Construction Grammar: from visual scene description to language comprehension and agrammatism. Neuroinformatics 12: 181–208.Find this resource:

Barrès, V., A. Simons, and M. A. Arbib (2013) Synthetic Event-Related Potentials: a computational bridge between neurolinguistic models and experiments. Neural Networks 37: 66–92.Find this resource:

Barsalou, Lawrence W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577–660.Find this resource:

Barsalou, Lawrence W. (2008a) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–45.Find this resource:

Barsalou, Lawrence W. (2008b) Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 364: 1281–9.Find this resource:

Barsalou, Lawrence W. (2010) Grounded cognition: past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science 2: 716–24.Find this resource:

Barsalou, Lawrence W., and Katja Wiemer-Hastings (2005) Situating abstract concepts. In Diane Pecher and Rolf Zwaan (eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought, pp. 129–163. New York: Cambridge.Find this resource:

Barsalou, L., W. Simmons, A. Barbey, and C. Wilson (2003) Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 84–91.Find this resource:

Barss, Andrew, and Howard Lasnik (1986) A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–54.Find this resource:

Bartlett, Frederick (1932) Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bates, E., and B. MacWhinney (1982) Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner and L. Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition: The state of the art, pp. 173–218. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bates, Elizabeth, Laura Benigni, Inge Bretherton, Luigi Camioni, and Virginia Volterra (1979) The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. New York: Academic Press. (p. 1016) Find this resource:

Bates, Elizabeth, Luigi Camioni, and Virginia Volterra (1975) The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 21: 205–26.Find this resource:

Bates, Elizabeth, and Brian MacWhinney (1988) What is functionalism? Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 27: 137–52.Find this resource:

Battig, W. F., and W. E. Montague. (1969) Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: a replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph 80.3.2: 1–46.Find this resource:

Battison, Robbin (1978) Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linkstok Press.Find this resource:

Bauer, Laurie (2001) Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Beard, Robert (1994) Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. In Ronald Asher (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, pp. 2137–40. Oxford: Pergamon.Find this resource:

Beckner, Clay, and Joan Bybee (2009) A usage-based account of constituency and reanalysis. Language Learning 59, Supplement 1.Find this resource:

Beddor, Patrice S., James D. Harnsberger, and Stephanie Lindemann (2002) Languagespecific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal of Phonetics 30: 591–627.Find this resource:

Beddor, Patrice S., Kevin McGowan, Julie E. Boland, Andries W. Coetzee, and Anthony Brasher (2013) The time course of perception of coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133: 2350–66.Find this resource:

Bell, Alan (1978) Syllabic consonants. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 2: Phonology, pp. 153–201. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Belletti, Adriana (1990) Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Find this resource:

Belletti, Adriana (ed.) (2004) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Belletti, Adriana (2009) Structures and Strategies. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Belloro, V. (2007) Spanish clitic doubling: a study of the syntax-pragmatics interface. PhD dissertation, University at Buffalo.Find this resource:

Bender, Emily, and Andreas Kathol (2001) Constructional effects of Just because … doesn’t meanBerkeley Linguistics Society 27.Find this resource:

Benincá, Paola (2001) The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, pp. 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.Find this resource:

Benincà, Paola (2006) A detailed map of the left periphery of medieval Romance. In R. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger, and P. Portner (eds.), Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture, pp. 53–86. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Find this resource:

Benincà, Paola, and Nicola Munaro (eds.) (2011) Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartogra-phy of Syntactic Structures, vol. 5. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Benincà, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto (2004) Topic, focus, and V2: defining the CP sublayers. In L. Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2, pp. 52–75. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Benua, Laura (1997) Transderivational identity: phonological relations between words. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available on the Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 259, http://roa.rutgers.eduFind this resource:

Benz, Anton, Gerhard Jäger, and Robert van Rooy (2006) Game Theory and Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. (p. 1017) Find this resource:

Berbeira Gardón, José Luis (1996) Los verbos modales ingleses: estudio semántico-pragmático. Cadiz: Servicio de Publicaciones.Find this resource:

Bergelson, Elika, and Daniel Swingley (2012) At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109: 3253–8.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin (2004) The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80: 290–311.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin K. (2007) Experimental methods for simulation semantics. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson and Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 277–301. Amsterdam: John H. Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin K. (2012) Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin, and Nancy Chang (2005) Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In Jan-Olastman and Miriam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, pp. 147–90. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Berman, Judith (2003) Clausal Syntax of German. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Berman, Ruth A. (1987) Productivity in the lexicon: new-word formation in modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica 21: 425–61.Find this resource:

Berman, R. A., and D. I. Slobin (1994) Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Bernstein, Lynne E. (2005) Phonetic processing by the speech perceiving brain. In David B. Pisoni and Robert E. Remez (eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception, 79–98. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Besnier, Niko (1988) The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language 64: 707–36.Find this resource:

Bianchi, Valentina (2006) On the syntax of personal arguments. Lingua 116: 2023–67.Find this resource:

Bianco, Maria T. (1996) Valenzlexikon deutsch-italienisch (2 vols). Heidelberg: Groos.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (1986) Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62: 384–414.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (1989) The typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (1992) On the complexity of discourse complexity: a multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes 15: 133–63. Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (2001: 215–40).Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 1–15.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (1995) Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (2001) Dimensions of variation among eighteenth-century speech-based and written registers. In Conrad and Biber (2001: 200–214).Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (2006) University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (2008) Corpus-based analyses of discourse: dimensions of variation in conversation. In V. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, and R. Jones (eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies, pp. 100–114. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Federica Barbieri (2007) Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263–86. (p. 1018) Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Jená Burges (2000) Historical change in the language use of women and men: gender differences in dramatic dialogue. Journal of English Linguistics 28: 21–37.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, Ulla Connor, and Thomas A. Upton (eds.) (2007) Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad (1999) Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In H. Hasselgard and S. Oksefjell (eds.), Out of Corpora: Studies in honor of Stig Johansson, pp. 181–9. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad (2009) Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Viviana Cortes (2004) If you look at … : lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25: 371–405.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen (1998) Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Pat Byrd, and Marie Helt (2002) Speaking and writing in the university: a multi-dimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36: 9–48.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, Mark Davies, James K. Jones, and Nicole Tracy-Ventura (2006) Spoken and written register variations in Spanish: a multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora 1: 7–38.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan (1989) Drift and the evolution of English style: a history of three genres. Language 65: 487–517.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan (1994a) Multi-dimensional analyses of authors’ styles: some case studies from the eighteenth century. In D. Ross and D. Brink (eds.), Research in Humanities Computing 3, pp. 3–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan (1994b) Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In N. Oostdijk and P. de Haan (eds.), Corpus-Based Research into Language, pp. 201–22. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (2001: 108–23).Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan (1997) Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In T. Nevalainen and L. Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, pp. 253–75. Helsinki: Société Neophilologique. Reprinted in Conrad and Biber (2001: 66–83).Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Mohamed Hared (1992) Dimensions of register variation in Somali. Language Variation and Change 4: 41–75.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Mohamed Hared (1994) Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: language adaptation in six press registers. In D. Biber and E. Finegan (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, pp. 182–216. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and James K. Jones (2005) Merging corpus linguistic and discourse analytic research goals: discourse units in biology research articles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 151–82.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, YouJin Kim, and Nicole Tracy-Ventura (2010) A corpus-driven approach to comparative phraseology: lexical bundles in English, Spanish, and Korean. In S. Iwasaki (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 17. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Jerry Kurjian (2007) Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: a multi-dimensional analysis. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, and C. Biewer (eds.), Corpus Linguistics and the Web, pp. 109–32. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, and Nicole Tracy-Ventura (2007) Dimensions of register variation in Spanish. In G. Parodi (ed.) Working with Spanish Corpora, pp. 54–89. London: Continuum. (p. 1019) Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, and Ian Roberts (2008) Structure and linearization in disharmonic word orders. Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 96–04.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, and Ian Roberts (2010) A syntactic universal and its consequences. Ms., http://research.ncl.ac.uk/linearization/BHR_2010.pdf

Bickel, Balthasar (2000) Grammar and social practice: on the role of ‘culture’ in linguistic relativity. In S. Niemeier and R. Dirven (eds.), Evidence for Linguistic Relativity, pp. 161–91. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2003) Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 79: 708–36.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2007) Typology in the 21st century: major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11: 239–51.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2010a) Absolute and statistical universals. In Patrick Colm Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, pp. 77–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2010b) Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: a multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause-hierarchy and Clause-linking: The syntax and pragmatics interface, pp. 51–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2011a) Grammatical relations typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology, pp. 399–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2011b) Multivariate typology and field linguistics: a case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan). In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, David Nathan and Lutz Marten (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3, 3–13. London: SOAS.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2011c) Statistical modeling of language universals. Linguistic Typology 15: 401–14.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2013) Distributional biases in language families. In Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson, and Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language Typology and Historical Contingency: Studies in honor of Johanna Nichols, pp. 415–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2014) Linguistic diversity and universals. In Nicholas J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman and Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; pre-print available at http://www.spw.uzh.ch/bickelfiles/papers/universals.Bickel2012.pdfFind this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar, and Johanna Nichols (1996ff) The AUTOTYP database. Electronic database; http://www.uzh.ch/spw/autotyp

Bickel, Balthasar, and Johanna Nichols (2006) Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the theory of linguistic areas. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 32.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar, and Johanna Nichols (2009) The geography of case. In Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, pp. 479–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar, Kristine Hildebrandt, and René Schiering (2009) The distribution of phonological word domains: a probabilistic typology. In Janet Grijzenhout and Bariş Kabak (eds.), Phonological Domains: Universals and deviations, pp. 47–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (p. 1020) Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar, Giorgio Iemmolo, Taras Zakharko, and Alena WitzlackMakarevich (in press-a) Patterns of alignment in verb agreement. In Dik Bakker and Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across Boundaries: Studies in the memory of Anna Siewierska, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton [preprint available at http://www.spw.uzh.ch/witzlack/Bickeletal2012Agreement.pdf].Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, and Taras Zakharko (in press-b) Typological evidence against universal effects of referential scales on case alignment. In Marc Richards, Andrej Malchukov, and Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky (eds.), Scales, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (1981) Roots of Language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (1990) Language and Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (2009) Recursion: core of complexity or artifact of analysis? In M. Shibatani and T. Givón (eds.), The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek, and Carol Odo (1976) Change and variation in Hawaiian English, vol. 1: The pidgin. MS, University of Hawaii.Find this resource:

Birner, Betty J., and Gregory Ward (1998) Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bisang, Walter (1996) Areal typology and grammaticalization: processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language 20: 519–97.Find this resource:

Bisang, Walter, and Peter Rinderknecht (eds.) (1991) Von Europa bis Ozeanien: von der Antonymie zum Relativsatz. Zürich: Universität Zürich.Find this resource:

Bishop, Judith, and Janet Fletcher (2005) Intonation in six dialects of Bininj Gun-wok. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, pp. 331–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bittner, Maria, and Kenneth Hale (1996) Ergativity: toward a theory of a heterogeneous class. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 531–604.Find this resource:

Black, Ezra, John Lafferty, and Salim Roukos (1992) Development and evaluation of a broad-coverage probabilistic grammar of English-language computer manuals. Proceedings of the 30th Association of Computer Linguistics Conference (ACL 92, Newark, Delaware), pp. 185–92.Find this resource:

Blackburn, Patrick, and Claire Gardent (1995) A specification language for lexical functional grammars. Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 39–44. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Find this resource:

Blaho, Sylvia, Patrick Bye, and Martin Krämer (eds.) (2007) Freedom of Analysis? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Blakemore, Diane (1987) Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Blakemore, Diane (2002) Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Blevins, James P. (2006) Syntactic features and feature structures. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, pp. 390–93. Oxford: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette (2004) Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bloom, Alfred H. (1981) The Linguistic Shaping of Thought: A Study in the Impact of Language on Thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Bloom, Alfred H. (1984) Caution—the words you use may affect what you say: a response to Au. Cognition 17: 275–87.Find this resource:

Bloom, Louis (1973) One Word at a Time: The Use of Single Word Utterances Before Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Bloomfield, Leonard (1933) Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (p. 1021) Find this resource:

Blumstein, Sheila E., and William Milberg (1983) Automatic and controlled processing in speech/language deficits in aphasia. In Symposium on Automatic Speech. Minneapolis, MN: Academy of Aphasia.Find this resource:

Blutner, Reinhard (2000) Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17: 189–216.Find this resource:

Blutner, Reinhard (2004) Pragmatics and the lexicon. In Horn and Ward (2004: 488–514).Find this resource:

Blutner, Reinhard, and Henk Zeevat (eds.) (2003) Optimality Theory and Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

Boas, Hans C. (2003) A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Boas, Hans C. (2005) Semantic frames as interlingual representations for multilingual lexical databases. International Journal of Lexicography 18: 445–78.Find this resource:

Bobaljik, Jonathan D. (1999) Adverbs: the hierarchy paradox. Glot International 4: 27–8.Find this resource:

Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Phil Branigan (2007) Eccentric agreement and multiple case checking. In Alana Johns, Diane Massam, and Juvenal Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Bobaljik, Jonathan D., and Höskuldur Thráinsson (1998) Two heads aren’t always better than one. Syntax 1: 37–71.Find this resource:

Bocci, Giuliano (2004) Contrastive focalisation on topics and preverbal subjects in Italian. Rivista di grammatica generativa 29: 3–60.Find this resource:

Bocci, Giuliano (2009) On syntax and prosody in Italian. PhD dissertation, University of Siena.Find this resource:

Bochner, Harry (1984) Inflection within derivation. Linguistic Review 3: 411–21.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (1992) A computational model of language performance: data-oriented parsing. Proceedings COLING 1992 (Nantes), pp. 855–9.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (1998) Beyond Grammar: An Experienced-Based Theory of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (1999) Context-sensitive spoken dialogue processing with the DOP Model. Natural Language Engineering 5: 309–23.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (2001) Sentence memory: storage vs. computation of frequent sentences. CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing 2001 (Philadelphia).Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (2006a) Exemplar-based syntax: how to get productivity from examples. Linguistic Review 23: 291–320.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (2006b) An all-subtrees approach to unsupervised parsing. Proceedings ACLCOLING 2006 (Sydney), pp. 865–72.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (2007a) Is the end of supervised parsing in sight? Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition (ACL 2007, Prague), pp. 400–7.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (2007b) A linguistic investigation into U-DOP. Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition (ACL 2007), pp. 1–8.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (2008) Constructions at work or at rest? Cognitive Linguistics 20: 129–34.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (2009) From exemplar to grammar:a probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Science 33: 752–93.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens, Jennifer Hay, and Stefanie Jannedy (eds.) (2003) Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens, and Ronald Kaplan (1998) A probabilistic corpus-driven model for lexical-functional analysis. Proceedings ACL-COLING 1998 (Montreal).Find this resource:

Bod, Rens, and Ronald Kaplan (2003) A DOP model for lexical-functional representations. In Bod et al. (2003), pp. 211–32. (p. 1022) Find this resource:

Bod, Rens, Remko Scha, and Khalil Sima’an (eds.) (2003) Data-Oriented Parsing. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2006) Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2008) Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long-Distance Dependencies. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2011) Approaching parameters from below. In Anna Maria di Sciullo and Cedric Boeckx (eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2014) Elementary Syntactic Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Boersma, Paul, and Bruce Hayes (2001) Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 45–86. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive: http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/roa.htmlFind this resource:

Boersma, P., and D. Weenink (2012) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Computer program available at http://www.praat.org/

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas J. Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke, and Felix K. Ameka (2007) Principles of event segmentation in language: the case of motion events. Language 83: 1–38.Find this resource:

Boland, Annerieke (2006) Aspect, Tense and Modality: Theory, Typology, Acquisition. Utrecht: LOT.Find this resource:

Bolinger, Dwight (1965) The atomization of meaning. Language 41: 555–73.Find this resource:

Bolinger, Dwight (1976) Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1: 1–14.Find this resource:

Bolinger, Dwight (1986) Intonation and its Parts: Melody in Spoken English. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Bonnema, Remko, Rens Bod, and Remko Scha (1997) A DOP model for semantic interpretation. Proceedings ACL/EACL 1997 (Madrid), pp. 159–67. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (1993) Against split morphology. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1993, pp. 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (1996) Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995, pp. 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (1999a) Lexical storage and regular processes. Brain and Behavioural Sciences 22: 1016.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (1999b) The Phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (2000) The phonology–morphology interface. In Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma (eds.), The first Glot International State-of-the-Article Book: The Latest in Linguistics, pp. 287–306. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (2002a) Prosodic restrictions on affixation in Dutch. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, pp. 183–202. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (2002b) The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (2005a) Compounding and derivation: evidence for construction morphology. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, and Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its Demarcations, pp. 109–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (2005b) Construction-dependent morphology. Linguee linguaggio 4: 31–46.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (2007) The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Morphology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (p. 1023) Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (2009) Lexical integrity as a morphological universal: a constructionist view. In Elisabetta Magni, Sergio Scalise, and Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of Language Today, pp. 83–100. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert, and Jerzy Rubach (1984) Morphological and prosodic domains in Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1: 1–27.Find this resource:

Borensztajn, Gideon, and Willem Zuidema (2007) Bayesian model merging for unsupervised constituent labeling and grammar induction. Technical Report PP-2007–40, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Borensztajn, Gideon, Willem Zuidema, and Rens Bod (2008) Children’s grammars grow more abstract with age: evidence from an automatic procedure for identifying the productive units of language. Proceedings CogSci 2008. Washington, DC: CogSci.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (1984) Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (2005) Structuring Sense (2 vols). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bornkessel, I., and M. Schlesewsky (2006a) The Extended Argument Dependency Model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 113: 787–821.Find this resource:

Bornkessel, I., and M. Schlesewsky (2006b) Generalised semantic roles and syntactic templates: a new framework for language comprehension. In Bornkessel et al. (2006: 327–53).Find this resource:

Bornkessel, I., B. McElree, M. Schlesewsky, and A. D. Friederici (2004) Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: dissociating phrase structure from case marking. Journal of Memory and Language 51: 495–522.Find this resource:

Bornkessel, I., M. Schlesewsky, B. Comrie, and A. Friederici (eds.) (2006) Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking: Theoretical, Typological and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bornkessel, I., M. Schlesewsky, and R. D. Van Valin, Jr. (2004) Syntactic templates and linking mechanisms: a new approach to grammatical function asymmetries. Poster presented at 17th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. Available on RRG website: http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/research/rrg.html

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., and M. Schlesewsky (2008) Unmarked transitivity: a processing constraint on linking. In Van Valin (2008b: 413–34).Find this resource:

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. and M. Schlesewsky (2013) Reconciling time, space and function: a new dorsal-ventral stream model of sentence comprehension. Brain Language 125: 60–76.Find this resource:

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., F. Kretzschmar, S. Tune, L. Wang, S. Genç, et al. (2011) Think globally: cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension. Brain and language 117: 133–52.Find this resource:

Borochovsky Bar-Aba, Esther (2003) Punctuation marks: procedural and conceptual uses. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1031–48.Find this resource:

Boroditsky, Lera (2000) Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75: 1–28.Find this resource:

Boroditsky, Lera (2001) Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43: 1–22.Find this resource:

Boroditsky, Lera, and Michael Ramscar (2002) The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13: 185–8.Find this resource:

Boroditsky, Lera, Lauren A. Schmidt, and Webb Phillips (2003) Sex, syntax and semantics. In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind, pp. 61–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (p. 1024) Find this resource:

Borowsky, Toni (1986) Topics in the lexical phonology of English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Bošković, Željko, and Howard Lasnik (eds.) (2007) Minimalist Syntax: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Botha, Rudolf (2005) Pidgin languages as a putative window on language evolution. Language and Communication 26: 1–14.Find this resource:

Bouma, Gosse (2006) Unification, classical and default. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Bowerman, Melissa (1973a) Early Syntactic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bowerman, Melissa (1973b) Structural relationships in children’s utterances: Syntactic or semantic? In T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, pp. 197–213. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Bowerman, Melissa (2005) Why can’t you ‘open’ a nut or a cooked noodle? Learning covert object categories in action word meanings. In L. Gershkoff-Stowe, and D. Rakison (eds.), Building Object Categories in Developmental Time, pp. 33–62. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Bowerman, Melissa, and Penelope Brown (eds.) (2008) Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Bowerman, Melissa, and Soonja Choi (2001) Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, pp. 475–511. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Boyes-Braem, Penny (1981) Features of the handshape in American Sign Language. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Brachman, Ronald J., and James G. Schmolze (1985) An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science 9: 171–216.Find this resource:

Bradlow, Ann R. (2002) Confluent talkerand listener-oriented forces in clear speech production. In Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7, pp. 241–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Braine, Martin D. S. (1963) On learning the grammatical order of words. Psychological Review 70, 323–48.Find this resource:

Brame, Michael (1978) Base Generated Syntax. Seattle, WA: Noit Amrofer.Find this resource:

Brasher, Anthony (2011) Nasal coarticulation in clear speech. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Pittsburgh, PA.Find this resource:

Brenier, Jason M., and Laura A. Michaelis (2005) Optimization via syntactic amalgam: syntax-prosody mismatch and copula doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 45–88.Find this resource:

Brennan, Mary (1990) Word Formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Find this resource:

Brent, Michael R., and Siskind, Jeffrey M. (2001) The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition 81: B33–B44.Find this resource:

Brentari, Diane (1998) A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (1977) Transformations and categories in syntax. In Robert E. Butts and Jaakko Hintikka (eds.), Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics. Part Three of the Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pp. 283–304. Dordrecht: Reidel. (p. 1025) Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (1978) A realistic transformational grammar. In eMorris Halle, Joan Bresnan, and George A. Miller (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, pp. 1–59. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (ed.) (1982a) The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (1982b) The passive in lexical theory. In Bresnan (1982a: 3–86).Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (1982c) Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343–434.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (1995) Linear order, syntactic rank, and empty categories: on weak crossover. In Dalrymple et al. (1995: 241–74).Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (1997) The emergence of the unmarked pronoun: Chichewâ pronominals in Optimality Theory. In Ashlee C. Bailey, Kevin E. Moore, and Jeri L. Moxley (eds.), Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 23: Special Session on Syntax and Semantics in Africa. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (1998) Morphology competes with syntax: explaining typological variation in weak crossover effects. In Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, and David Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, pp. 59–92. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (2000) Optimal Syntax. In Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw, and Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition, pp. 334–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (2001a) Explaining morphosyntactic competition. In Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, pp. 11–44. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (2001b) Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen, and Stephen Wechsler (forthcoming) Lexical-Functional Syntax, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (2007) Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In Sam Featherston and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, pp. 77–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and R. Harald Baayen (2007) Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bouma, I. Kraemer, and J. Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, pp. 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, Ashwini Deo, and Devyani Sharma (2007) Typology in variation: a probabilistic approach to be and n’t in the Survey of English Dialects. English Language and Linguistics 11: 301–46.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Jennifer Hay (2007) Gradient grammar: an effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 118: 245–59.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Jonni M. Kanerva (1989) Locative inversion in Chichewâ: a case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1–50.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Marilyn Ford (2010) Predicting syntax: processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86: 186–213.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Sam A. Mchombo (1987) Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewâ. Language 63: 741–82.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Sam A. Mchombo (1995) The Lexical Integrity Principle: evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 181–254.Find this resource:

Bresson, François (1977) Semantics, syntax, and utterance: Determining a referent. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 4: 31–41.Find this resource:

Brinton, Laurel J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott (2005) Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (p. 1026) Find this resource:

Brisard, Frank (ed.) (2002) Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Broca, P. (1861/1960) Remarks on the seat of the faculty of articulate language, followed by an observation of aphemia In G von Bonin (ed.), Some Papers on the Cerebral Cortex. Oxford: Blackwell Scienfitic Publications.Find this resource:

Brodmann, K. (1909) Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre Der Großhirnrinde In Ihren Prinzipien Dargestellt Auf Grund Des Zellenbaues. Leipzig: Ja Barth.Find this resource:

Bromhead, Helen (2009) The Reign of Truth and Faith: Epistemic Expressions in 1 6th and 17th Century English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Brouland, Josephine (1855) Langage mimique: spécimen d’un dictionnaire des signes. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Archives.Find this resource:

Browman, Catherine P., and Louis M. Goldstein (1986) Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3: 219–252.Find this resource:

Browman, Catherine P., and Louis M. Goldstein (1992) Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49: 155–80.Find this resource:

Brown, Gillian, and George Yule (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Penelope (2001) Learning to talk about motion UP and DOWN in Tzeltal: is there a language-specific bias for verb learning? In M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, pp. 512–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Roger W. (1957) Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology 55: 1–5.Find this resource:

BrugÈ, Laura (2002) The position of demonstratives in the Extended Nominal Projection. In G. Cinque (ed.), Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 1, pp. 15–53. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bruner, Jerome S., Jacqueline J. Goodnow, and George A. Austin (1956) A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley.Find this resource:

Brunyé, Tad T., Tali Ditman, Caroline R. Mahoney, Jason S. Augustyn, and Holley A. Taylor (2009) When you and I share perspectives pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science 20: 27–32.Find this resource:

Bryant, John (2008) Best-fit Constructional Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Bryant, John, and Luca Gilardi (2012) A cognitive model of sentence interpretation. In Boas, Hans C. (ed.), Computational Approaches to Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. Chapter 3.Find this resource:

Bühler, Karl (1982[1934]) Spachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer.Find this resource:

Bultinck, B. (2005) Numerous Meaning: The Meaning of English Cardinals and the Legacy of Paul Grice. Oxford: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Burchardt, Aljoscha, Katrin Erk, Anette Frank, Andrea Kowalski, and Sebastian Padó (2006) The SALSA corpus: a German corpus resource for lexical semantics. Proceedings of LREC 2006, Workshop on Semantically Annotated Corpora (Genoa), pp. 969–74. Paris: ELRA.Find this resource:

Burling, Robbins (2004) The Language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo), vol. 1: Grammar. New Delhi/Morganville, NJ: Bibliophile South Asia/Promilla. (p. 1027) Find this resource:

Burton-Robert, Noel (ed.) (2007) Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

Bush, Nathan (2001) Frequency effects and word-boundary palatalization in English. In Bybee and Hopper (2001: 255–80).Find this resource:

Butler, Christopher S. (1998) Collocational frameworks in Spanish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3: 1–32.Find this resource:

Butler, Christopher S. (2003a) Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major StructuralFunctional Theories. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Butler, Christopher S. (2003b) Approaches to the Simple Clause. Part 1 of Butler (2003a).Find this resource:

Butler, Christopher S. (2004) Notes towards an incremental implementation of the Role and Reference Grammar semantics-to-syntax mapping rules for English. In M. Hannay and G. Steen (eds.), The English Clause: Usage and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 275–307.Find this resource:

Butler, Christopher S. (2008) Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase. In Jan Rijkhoff and Daniel García Velasco (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 221–61.Find this resource:

Butler, Christopher S., and Miriam Taverniers (2008) Layering in structural-functional grammars. Linguistics 46: 689–756.Find this resource:

Butt, David (1988) Randomness, order and the latent patterning of text. In R. Fawcett and D. Young (eds.), Functions of Style, pp. 74–97. London: Pinter.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam (1995) The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, M. (2001) A Reexamination of the Accusative to Ergative Shift. In M. Butt and T. H. King (eds.), Time over Matter: Diachronic perspectives on morphosyntax, pp. 105–41. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, Mary Dalrymple, and Anette Frank (1997) An architecture for linking theory in LFG. In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG 97 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, Mary Dalrymple, and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) (2006) Intelligent Linguistic Architectures: Variations on Themes by Ronald M. Kaplan. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, Helge Dyvik, Tracy Holloway King, Hiroshi Masuichi, and Christian Rohrer (2002) The parallel grammar project. Proceedings of COLING-2002 Workshop on Grammar Engineering and Evaluation, pp. 1–7.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) (1996) Proceedings of the LFG96 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (1998a) Interfacing Phonology with LFG. In Butt and King (1998b).Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) (1998b) Proceedings of the LFG98 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) (2000a) Argument Realization. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (2000b) Null elements in discourse structure. In K. V. Subbarao (ed.), Papers from the NULLS Seminar. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) (2001a) Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) (2001b) Time Over Matter: Diachronic Perspecitves on Morphosyntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (p. 1028) Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (2004) The status of case. In Veneeta Dayal and Anoop Mahajan (eds.), Clause Structure in South Asian Languages, pp. 153–98. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) (2006) Lexical Semantics in LFG. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) (2007) Proceedings of the LFG07 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, and Tracy Holloway King (eds.) (2009) Proceedings of the LFG07 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, Tracy Holloway King, María-Eugenia Niño, and Frédérique Segond (1999) A Grammar Writer’s Cookbook. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Butt, Miriam, María-Eugenia Niño, and Frédérique Segond (1996) Multilingual processing of auxiliaries within LFG. In Dafydd Gibbon (ed.), Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology: Results of the 3 rd KONVENS Conference, pp. 111–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (1985a) Morphology: a Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (1985b) Diagrammatic iconicity in stem–inflection relations. In John Haiman (ed.) Iconicity in Syntax, pp. 11–47. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (1988a) The diachronic dimension in explanation. In John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining Language Universals, pp. 350–79. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (1988b) Morphology as lexical organization. In Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical Morphology, pp. 119–41. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (1988c) Semantic substance vs. contrast in the development of grammatical meaning. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 247–64.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 425–55.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (1998) The emergent lexicon. Chicago Linguistic Society 34, The Panels: 421–35.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2000a) Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments. In Michael Broe and Janet Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5: Acquisition and the Lexicon, pp. 250–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2000b) The phonology of the lexicon: evidence from lexical diffusion. In Barlow and Kemmer (2000: 65–85).Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2001a) Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2001b) Frequency effects on French liaison. In Bybee and Hopper (2001: 361–82).Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2002a) Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In T. Givón and Bertram F. Malle (eds.), The Emergence of Language out of Pre-language, pp. 107–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2002b) Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically-conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261–90.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2002c) Phonological evidence for examplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 215–21.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2003a) Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language, vol. 2, pp. 145–67. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2003b) Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: the role of frequency. In Joseph and Janda (2003: 602–23).Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2006a) From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language 82: 4: 711–33. (p. 1029) Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2006b) Language change and universals. In Ricardo Mairal and Juana Gil (eds.), Linguistic Universals, pp. 179–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2006c) Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2008) Formal universals as emergent phenomena: the origins of Structure Preservation. In Jeff Good (ed.), Language Universals and Language Change, pp. 108–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and David Eddington (2006) A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of becoming. Language 82: 323–55.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.) (1997) Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Paul J. Hopper (eds.) (2001) Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and John McClelland (2005) Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. Linguistic Review 22: 381–410.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Carol Lynn Moder (1983) Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59: 251–70.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins (1991) Back to the future. In Traugott and Heine (1991b: 17–58).Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca (1994) The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Joanne Scheibman (1999) The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37: 575–96.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Dan I. Slobin (1982) Why small children cannot change language on their own: evidence from the English past tense. In A. Alqvist (ed.), Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, pp. 29–37. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Sandra A. Thompson. (1997) Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23: 378–88.Find this resource:

Byrne, Richard W., and Andrew Whiten (eds.) (1988) Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Caffarel, Alice (2004) The construal of a second-order semiosis in Camus’ L’Étranger. In David Banks (ed.), Text and Texture: Systemic Functional Viewpoints on the Nature and Structure of Text, pp. 537–70. Paris: L’Harmattan.Find this resource:

Caffarel, Alice (2006a) A Systemic Functional Grammar of French: From Grammar to Discourse. London: Continuum.Find this resource:

Caffarel, Alice (2006b) Learning advanced French through SFL. In Heidi Byrnes (ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, pp. 204–24. London: Continuum.Find this resource:

Caffarel, Alice, James R. Martin, and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds.) (2004) Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Caffarel, Alice, and Elizabeth Rechniewski (2008) Ideological opposition in news stories: a French case study. In Elizabeth Thomson and Peter White (eds.), Communicating Conflict: Multilingual Case Studies of the Rhetoric of the News Media, pp. 25–49. London: Continuum.Find this resource:

Cahill, Aoife, Michael Burke, Ruth O’Donovan, Stefan Riezler, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way (2008) Wide-coverage deep statistical parsing using automatic dependency structure annotation. Computational Linguistics 34: 81–124. (p. 1030) Find this resource:

Cahill, Aoife, Martin Forst, Michael Burke, Mairéad McCarthy, Ruth O’Donovan, Christian Rohrer, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way (2005) Treebank-based acquisition of multilingual unification grammar resources. Research on Language and Computation 3: 247–79.Find this resource:

Camazine, Scott, Jean-Louis Deneubourg, Nigel R. Franks, James Sneyd, Guy Theraulaz, and Eric Bonabeau (2001) Self-Organization in Biological Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Čamdžić, Amela, and Richard Hudson (2007) Serbo-Croat clitics and Word Grammar. Research in Language (University of Lodz) 4: 5–50.Find this resource:

Campbell, Lyle (1991) Some grammaticalization changes in Estonian and their implications. In Traugott and Heine (1991a: 285–99).Find this resource:

Campbell, Lyle (2001) What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23: 113–61.Find this resource:

Campbell, Lyle, and Richard Janda (2001) Introduction: conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences 23: 93–112.Find this resource:

Cantrall, William R. (1974) Viewpoint, Reflexives, and the Nature of Noun Phrases. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Cara, Francesco, and Guy Politzer (1993) A comparison of conditional reasoning in English and Chinese. In J. Altarriba (ed.), Cognition and Culture: A Cross-Cultural Approach to Cognitive Psychology, pp. 283–97. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Find this resource:

Caramazza, Alfonso, and Bradford Z. Mahon (2006) The organization of conceptual knowledge in the brain: the future’s past and some future directions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 23: 13–38.Find this resource:

Caramazza, Alfonso, and Kevin Shapiro (2004) Language categories in the brain. In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3, pp. 15–38. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cardinaletti, Anna (2004) Towards a cartography of syntactic positions. In L. Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2, pp. 115–65. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Carkin, Susan (2001) Pedagogic language in introductory classes: a multi-dimensional analysis of textbooks and lectures in biology and macroeconomics. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.Find this resource:

Carlson, Greg N. (1983) Marking constituents. In F. Heny and B. Richards (eds.), Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, vol. 1, pp. 69–98. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Carpenter, Patricia, Akira Miyake, and Marcel Just (1994) Working memory constraints in comprehension: evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. In M. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, pp. 1075–1122. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Carroll, John, and Michael Tanenhaus (1975) Prolegomena to a functional theory of word formation. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers from the Parasession on Functionism, pp. 47–62.Find this resource:

Carroll, John, and David Weir (2000) Encoding frequency information in stochastic parsing models. In H. Bunt and A. Nijholt (eds.), Advances in Probabilistic Parsing and Other Parsing Technologies, pp. 13–28. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Carroll, Sean B. (2005) Endless Forms Most Beautiful. New York: Norton.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn (1988) Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In R. M. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, pp. 155–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn (1994) Metalinguistic negation and echoic use. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 321–39. (p. 1031) Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn (1998) Postscript (1995) to Carston (1988). In A. Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, vol. 4, pp. 464–79. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn (2001) Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 1–34.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn (2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn (2007) How many pragmatic systems are there? In M. J. Frápolli (ed.), Saying, Meaning and Referring: Essays on François Recanati’s Philosophy of Language, pp. 18–48. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn, and Eun-Ju Noh (1995) A truth-functional account of metalinguistic negation, with evidence from Korean. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 1–26.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn, and George Powell (2005) Relevance theory: new directions and developments. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17: 279–99.Find this resource:

Carter, A. (1974) Communication in the sensory-motor period. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Casenhiser, Devin, and Adele E. Goldberg (2005) Fast mapping of a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science 8: 500–508.Find this resource:

Casillas, Marisa, Bobb C. Susan, and Eve V. Clark (submitted) Turn taking, timing, and planning in early language acquisition. (ms. 51 pp., 9/2013).Find this resource:

Cauvet, Elodie, Rita Limissuri, Sévérine Millotte, Katrin Skoruppa, Dominque Cabrol, and Anne Christophe (2014) Function words constrain on-line recognition of verbs and nouns in French 18-month-olds. Language Learning and Development 10: 1–18.Find this resource:

Chafe, Wallace (ed.) (1980) The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Find this resource:

Chafe, Wallace (1998) Language and the flow of thought. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, pp. 93–111. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Chambers, J. K., and Peter Trudgill (1980) Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chan, Cheri C. Y., Twila Tardif, Jie Chen, Rachel B. Pulverman, Liqi Zhu, and Xiangzhi Meng (2011) English-and Chinese-learning infants map novel labels to objects and actions differently. Developmental Psychology 47: 1457–71.Find this resource:

Chang, Nancy, and Eva Mok (2006) Putting context in constructions. The Fourth International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG4, Tokyo).Find this resource:

Chapman, Siobhan (2005) Paul Grice: Philosopher and Linguist. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

Charniak, Eugene (1997) Statistical techniques for natural language parsing. AI Magazine, Winter: 32–43.Find this resource:

Chemla, Emannuel, Toben H. Mintz, Savita Bernal, and Anne Christophe (2009) Categorizing words using ‘frequent frames’: What cross-linguistic analyses reveal about distributional acquisition strategies. Developmental Science 12: 396–406.Find this resource:

Chen, Jenn-Yeu (2007) Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition 104: 427–36.Find this resource:

Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Rint Sybesma (1999) Bare and not so bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 304: 509–42. (p. 1032) Find this resource:

Cherniak, Christopher, Zekeria Mokhtarzada, Raul Rodriguez-Esteban, and Mark Changizi (2004) Global optimization of cerebral cortex layout. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 1081–6.Find this resource:

Chesi, Cristiano (2005) Phases and cartography in linguistic computation: toward a cognitively motivated computational model of linguistic competence. PhD dissertation, University of Siena.Find this resource:

Cheyney, Dorothy L., and Robert M. Seyfarth (2007) Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Chi, Zhiyi, and Stuart Geman (1998) Estimation of probabilistic context-free grammars. Computational Linguistics 24: 299–305.Find this resource:

Chiang, David (2003) Statistical parsing with an automatically extracted tree adjoining grammar. 2003. In R. Bod, R. Scha, and K. Sima’an (eds.), Data Oriented Parsing, pp. 299–316. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405.Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro (2004) Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond, pp. 39–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Chistovich, Ludmilla A. (1985) Central auditory processing of peripheral vowel spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77: 789–805.Find this resource:

Chitoran, Ioana, and Abigail C. Cohn (2009) Complexity in phonetics and phonology: gradience, categoriality, and naturalness. In François Pellegrino, Egidio Marsico, Ioana Chitoran, Christophe Coupé (eds.), Approaches to Phonological Complexity, pp. 21–46. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chitoran, Ioana, and Louis Goldstein (2006) Testing the phonological status of perceptual recoverability: articulatory evidence from Georgian. Paper presented at the Tenth Conference of Laboratory Phonology (LabPhon10), Paris.Find this resource:

Chitoran, Ioana, Louis Goldstein, and Dani Byrd (2002) Gestural overlap and recoverability: articulatory evidence from Georgian. In Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7, pp. 419–447. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Choi, Soonja (2000) Caregiver input in English and Korean: Use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language 27: 69–96.Find this resource:

Choi, Soonja, and Melissa Bowerman (1991) Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41: 81–121.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1951) Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew. MA thesis, University of Pennsylvania. Published 1979, New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1955) The logical structure of linguistic theory. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1959) Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35: 26–58.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1961) Some methodological remarks on generative grammar. Word 17: 219–39.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1966) Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1968/1972) Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1970) Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, pp. 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn. (p. 1033) Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1972) Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1973) Conditions on transformations. In Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, pp. 232–86. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1977) On wh-movement. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, pp. 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1980) Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1982) The Generative Enterprise. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1986a) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport, CT: Praeger.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1986b) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1988) Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1992) A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1993) A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, pp. 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted in Chomsky (1995: 167–217).Find this resource:

Chomksy, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2000a) Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step, pp. 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2000b) New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2001a) Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dept of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2001b) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, pp. 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2004) Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, pp. 104–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2007) Approaching UG from below. In Uli Sauerland and Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, pp. 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2008) On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, pp. 133–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2009) Opening remarks. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini, P. Salaburu, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, 13–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2010) Some simple evo devo theses: how true might they be for language? In Richard K. Larson, Viviane Déprez, and Hiroko Yamakido (eds.), The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives, pp. 45–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle (1968) The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik (1977) Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 425–504. (p. 1034) Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik (1993) The theory of principles and parameters. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann, Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pp. 506–69. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam, and George A. Miller (1963) Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In R. Luce, R. Bush, and E. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, pp. 269–321. New York: Wiley.Find this resource:

Chouinard, Michelle M., and Eve V. Clark (2003) Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language 30: 637–69.Find this resource:

Christie, Frances, and J. R. Martin (2006) Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum.Find this resource:

Chung, Sandra (1998) The Design of Agreement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Chung, Sandra, and James McCloskey (1987) Government, barriers and small clauses in Modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 173–237.Find this resource:

Church, Alonzo (1940) A formulation of the simple theory of types. Journal of Symbolic Logic 5: 56–68.Find this resource:

Church, Andrea Brandilyn (2005) Linguistic relativity, nonlinguistic influences, and spatial conceptualization: ascertaining the relationship between language and environment. Honors thesis, Univeristy of Oregon, Eugene.Find this resource:

Cienki, Alan, and Cornelia Müller (2008) Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, pp. 483–501. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (1990) Types of A-bar Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (1994) On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, and R. Zanuttini (eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, pp. 85–110. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (ed.) (2002) Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (2004) Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114: 683–710.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (2005) Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 315–32.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (2006a) Restructuring and Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (2006b) Are all languages ‘numeral classifier languages’? Rivista di grammatica generativa 31: 119–22.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (2009) The fundamental left–right asymmetry of natural languages. In S. Scalise, E. Magni, and A. Bisetto (eds.), Universals of Language Today, pp. 165–84. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (2010) The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo, and Luigi Rizzi (2010) Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 6. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Clancy, Patricia (1985) The acquisition of Japanese. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 1, pp. 373–524. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (p. 1035) Find this resource:

Clancy, Patricia (2003) The lexicon in interaction: Developmental origins of preferred argument structure in Korean. In J. W. DuBois, L. Kumpf, and W. Ashby (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function, pp. 81–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Clark, Alexander (2000) Inducing syntactic categories by context distribution clustering. Proceedings CoNLL 2000, pp. 91–4.Find this resource:

Clark, Alexander (2001) Unsupervised induction of stochastic context-free grammars using distributional clustering. Proceedings CoNLL 2001, pp. 105–112.Find this resource:

Clark, Alexander, and Remy Eyraud (2006) Learning auxiliary fronting with grammatical inference. Proceedings CoNLL 2006 (New York).Find this resource:

Clark, Billy (1993) Relevance and ‘pseudo-imperatives’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 79–121.Find this resource:

Clark, Brady Z. (2004) A stochastic Optimality Theory approach to syntactic change. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Find this resource:

Clark, Brady Z. (2005) On stochastic grammar. Language 81: 207–17.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1973) Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition 2: 161–82.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1977) Strategies and the mapping problem in first language acquisition. In J. Macnamara (ed.), Language Learning and Thought, pp. 147–68. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1978a) Locationals: Existential, locative, and possessive constructions. In J H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, vol. 4, pp. 85–126. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1978b) Awareness of language: Some evidence from what children say and do. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella, and W. J. M. Levelt (eds.), The Child’s Conception of Language, pp. 17–43. New York: Springer Verlag.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1980) Here’s the top: Nonlinguistic strategies in the acquisition of orientational terms. Child Development 51: 329–38.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1982a). Language change during language acquisition. In M. E. Lamb and A. L. Brown (eds.), Advances in Developmental Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 173–97. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1982b). The young word-maker: A case study of innovations in the child’s lexicon. In E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, pp. 390–425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1985) The acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 1, pp. 687–782. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve (1990) On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17: 417–31.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve (1992) Conventionality and contrast: pragmatic principles with lexical consequences. In Adrienne Lehrer and E. F. Kittay (eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts, pp. 171–88. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve (1993) The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1995) Language acquisition: The lexicon and syntax. In J. L. Miller and P. D. Eimas (eds.), Handbook of Perception and Cognition (2nd edition), vol. 11: Speech, Language, and Communication, pp. 303–37. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (2007a) Young children’s uptake of new words in conversation. Language in Society 36: 157–182.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (2007b) Conventionality and contrast in language acquisition. In M. Sabbagh and C. Kalish (eds.), Conventionality in Cognitive Development: How Children Acquire Shared Representations in Language, Thought, and Action, pp. 11–23. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (p. 1036) Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (2009) First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (2010) Adult offer, word-class, and child uptake in early lexical acquisition. First Language, 30: 250–69.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V., and Ruth A. Berman (1984) Structure and use in the acquisition of word formation. Language 60: 542–90.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V., and Melissa Bowerman (1986) On the acquisition of final voiced stops. In J. A. Fishman (ed.), The Fergusonian Impact, vol. 1: From Phonology to Society, pp. 51–68. Berlin and Amsterdam: Mouton/de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V., and Herbert H. Clark (1979) When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V., and Sophia R. Cohen (1984) Productivity and memory for newly formed words. Journal of Child Language 11: 611–25.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V., and Marie-Catherine de Marneffe (2012) Constructing verb paradigms in French: Adult construals and emerging grammatical contrasts. Morphology 22: 89–120.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V., and Barbara F. Hecht (1982) Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition 12: 1–24.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V., and D.-W. Andrew Wong (2002) Pragmatic directions about language use: words and word meanings. Language in Society 31: 181–212.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V., S. A. Gelman, and N. M. Lane (1985) Compound nouns and category structure in young children. Child Development 56: 84–94.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V., Barbara F. Hecht, and Randa C. Mulford (1986) Coining complex compounds in English: Affixes and word order in acquisition. Linguistics 24: 7–29.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. (1973a) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Timothy E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, pp. 27–63. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. (1973b) The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 335–59.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. (1997) Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes 23: 567–98.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H., and Meredith Krych (2004) Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 50: 62–81.Find this resource:

Clements, G. N. (1985) The geometry of phonological features. Phonology 2, 225–52.Find this resource:

Clements, G. N. (1990) The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In John Kingston and Mary Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, pp. 283–333. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Coene, Ann (2006) Lexikalische Bedeutung, Valenz und Koerzion. Germanistische Linguistik Monographien 19. Hildesheim: Olms.Find this resource:

Coetzee, Andries (2001) Nasal-only syllables in Tswana. In Andriew Coetzee, René Kager, and Joe Pater (eds.), Ruling Papers II: Relations Between Phonological Models And Experimental Data. Special issue of Phonology.Find this resource:

Coetzee, Andries, and Joe Pater (2011) The place of variation in phonological theory. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Coetzee, Andries W. and Shigeto Kawahara (2013) Frequency biases in phonological variation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 47–89.Find this resource:

Cohen, Anthony (1987) Morfologie op heterdaad betrapt. Forum der Letteren 28: 90–97.Find this resource:

Cohn, Abigail C., Cécile Fougeron, and Marie K. Huffman (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cojocaru, Dana (2003) Romanian Grammar. Durham, NC: Slavic and East European Language Research Center, Duke University. (p. 1037) Find this resource:

Cole, Jennifer, Gary Linebaugh, Cheyenne M. Munson, and Bob McMurray (2010) Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: a statistical modeling approach. Journal of Phonetics 38: 167–84.Find this resource:

Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry (eds.) (1975) Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Coleman, John, and Janet Pierrehumbert (1997) Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability. In Computational Phonology: Third Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology, pp. 49–56.Find this resource:

Colleman, Timothy, Bart Defrancq, Filip Devos, and Dirk Noël (2004) The Contragram Dutch–French–English Contrastive Verb Valency Dictionary. Ghent: University of Ghent (http://www.contragram.ugent.be/cvvd.htm).Find this resource:

Collins Dictionary of the English Language (1985) Glasgow: Collins.Find this resource:

Collins, Michael (1996) A new statistical parser based on bigram lexical dependencies. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 34: 184–91.Find this resource:

Collins, Michael (1999) Head-driven statistical models for natural language processing. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Collins, Michael, and Nigel Duffy (2001) Convolution kernels for natural language. Neural Information Processing Systems 2001.Find this resource:

Collins, Peter (1991) Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Collins, Peter (1995) The indirect object construction in English: an informational approach. Linguistics 33: 35–49.Find this resource:

Compston, A. (2006) From the Archives: Lichtheim on Aphasia. Brain: a journal of neurology 129: 1347–50.Find this resource:

Comrie, Bernard (1981) Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Connor, Ulla (2004) The genre of grant proposals: a corpus linguistic analysis. In Connor and Upton (2003: 235–56).Find this resource:

Connor, Ulla, and Thomas Upton (2003) Linguistic dimensions of direct mail letters. In C. Meyer and P. Leistyna (eds.), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, pp. 71–86. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Find this resource:

Connor-Linton, Jeff (2001) Authors style and world-view: a comparison of texts about nuclear arms policy. In Conrad and Biber (2001: 84–93).Find this resource:

Connor-Linton, Jeff, and E. Shohamy (2001) Register variation, oral proficiency sampling, and the promise of multi-dimensional analysis. In Conrad and Biber (2001: 124–37).Find this resource:

Conrad, Susan (1996a) Academic discourse in two disciplines: professional writing and student development in biology and history. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.Find this resource:

Conrad, Susan (1996b) Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: an example from biology. Linguistics and Education 8: 299–326.Find this resource:

Conrad, Susan (2001a) Variation among disciplinary texts: a comparison of textbooks and journal articles in biology and history. In Conrad and Biber (2001: 94–107).Find this resource:

Conrad, Susan (ed.) (2001b) Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Conrad, Susan, and Douglas Biber (eds.) (2001) Multi-dimensional Studies of Register Variation in English. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Conroy, Anastasia, Eri Takahashi, Jeffrey Lidz, and Clin Phillips (2008) Equal treatment for all antecedents: how children succeed with Principle B. MS, Dept of Linguistics, University of Maryland.Find this resource:

Conwell, Erin, and James Morgan (2012) Is it a noun or is it a verb? Resolving the ambicategoriality problem. Language Learning and Development 8: 87–112. (p. 1038) Find this resource:

Cooper, Franklin S., Pierre C. Delattre, Alvin M. Liberman, John Borst, and Louis J. Gerstman (1952) Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24: 597–606.Find this resource:

Copestake, Ann, and Ted Briscoe (1995) Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics 12: 15–67.Find this resource:

Corballis, M.C. (2009) The evolution and genetics of cerebral asymmetry. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 364: 867–79.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2000) Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2005) The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges and David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, pp. 25–49. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G., and Ian R. L. Davies (1997) Establishing basic color terms: measures and techniques. In C. L. Hardin and L. Maffi (eds.), Color Categories in Thought and Language, pp. 197–223. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Cormons, Boris (1999) Analyse et désambiguisation: une approche à base de corpus (data-oriented parsing) pour les représentations lexicales fonctionelles. PhD thesis, University of Rennes.Find this resource:

Corrin, Juliette (2010) Maternal repair initiation at MLU Stage 1: The developmental power of ‘hm?’. First Language 30: 312–28.Find this resource:

Cortes, Viviana (2002) Lexical bundles in academic writing in history and biology. Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University.Find this resource:

Cortes, Viviana (2004) Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23: 397–423.Find this resource:

Coulson, Seana (2007) Electrifying Results: ERP Data and Cognitive Linguistics. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, and Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 400–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Coulson, Seana, and Teenie Matlock (2001) Metaphor and the space structuring model. Metaphor & Symbol 16: 295–316.Find this resource:

Coulson, Seanna, Jonathon King, and Marta Kutas (1998) Expect the unexpected: eventrelated brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes 13: 21–58.Find this resource:

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2001) Interactional Prosody: High Onsets in Reason-for-the-Call Turns. Language in Society 30: 29–53.Find this resource:

Craig, Colette (ed.) (1986) Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Crain, Stephen (1991) Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavorial and Brain Sciences 14: 597–612.Find this resource:

Crain, Stephen, and Mineharu Nakayama (1987) Structure dependence in grammar formation. Language 63: 522–43.Find this resource:

Crain, Stephen, and P. Pietroski (2002) Why language acquisition is a snap. Linguistic Review 19: 163–83.Find this resource:

Creider, Chet, and Richard Hudson (2006) Case agreement in Ancient Greek: implications for a theory of covert elements. In Kensei Sugayama and Richard Hudson (eds.), Word Grammar: New Perspectives on a Theory of Language Structure, pp. 35–53. London: Continuum.Find this resource:

Crick, Francis (1998) What Mad Pursuit : A Personal View of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Cristofaro, Sonia (2008) Grammatical categories and relations: universality vs. language-specificity and construction-specificity. MS, University of Pavia. (p. 1039) Find this resource:

Crocker, Matthew, and Frank Keller (2006) Probabilistic grammars as models of gradience in language processing. In G. Fanselow, C. Féry, R. Vogel, and M. Schlesewsky (eds.), Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–45.Find this resource:

Croft, William (2000) Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Croft, William (2001) Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, William (2002) Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, William (2003) Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, William (2006) Typology. In Aronoff and Rees-Miller (2006: 337–68).Find this resource:

Croft, William (2007a) Construction grammar. In D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 463–508. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, William (2007b) The origins of grammar in the verbalization of experience. Cognitive Linguistics 18: 339–82.Find this resource:

Croft, William, and D. A. Cruse (2002) Cognitive Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, William, and Alan D. Cruse (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, William and Keith T. Poole (2008) Inferring universals from grammatical variation: multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34: 1–37.Find this resource:

Cross, Marilyn (1993) Collocation in computer modeling of lexis as most delicate grammar. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, pp. 196–220. London: Pinter.Find this resource:

Crossley, Scott A., and Max M. Louwerse (2007) Multi-dimensional register classification using bigrams. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12: 453–78.Find this resource:

Crosswhite, Katherine (1999) Vowel reduction in Optimality Theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Crosswhite, Katherine (2001) Predicting syllabicity and moraicity in Dihovo Macedonian. In J. S. Magnuson and Katherine Crosswhite (eds.), University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 1–22.Find this resource:

Crouch, Richard (2005) Packed rewriting for mapping semantics to KR. Sixth International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-6) (Tilburg), pp. 103–114.Find this resource:

Crouch, Richard (2006) Packed rewriting for mapping text to semantics and KR. In Butt et al. (2006: 389–416).Find this resource:

Crouch, Richard, Mary Dalrymple, Ron Kaplan, Tracy King, John Maxwell, and Paula Newman (2008) XLE Documentation. Palo Alto, CA: Palo Alto Research Center.Find this resource:

Crouch, Richard, and Tracy Holloway King (2006) Semantics via f-structure rewriting. In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, pp. 145–165. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Cruschina, Silvio (2006) Informational focus in Sicilian and the left periphery. In M. Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of Interpretation, pp. 363–85. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Cruschina, Silvio (2008) Discourse-related features and the syntax of peripheral positions: a comparative study of Sicilian and other Romance languages. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Find this resource:

Cruse, D. Alan (1986) Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Crystal, David (2010) Semantic targeting: past, present, and future. Aslib Proceedings 62: 355–65. (p. 1040) Find this resource:

Csomay, Eniko (2005) Linguistic variation within university classroom talk: a corpus-based perspective. Linguistics and Education 15: 243–74.Find this resource:

Culicover, Peter W. (1999) Syntactic Nuts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Culicover, Peter W., and Ray Jackendoff (1999) The view from the periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 543–71.Find this resource:

Culicover, Peter W., and Ray Jackendoff (2005) Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Culicover, Peter W., and Andrzej Novak (2003) Dynamical Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Curie, Thomas E., Simon J. Greenhill, and Ruth Mace (2010) Is horizontal transmission really a problem for phylogenetic comparative methods? A simulation study using continuous cultural traits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 3909–12.Find this resource:

Curtin, Suzanne, Toben H. Mintz, and Dani Byrd (2001) Coarticulatory cues enhance infants’ recognition of syllable sequences in speech. In Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez, and Aimee Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25 th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 190–201. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Cutler, Anne, Frank Eisner, James M. McQueen, and Dennis Norris (2010) How abstract phonemic categories are necessary for coping with speaker-related variation. In Cécile Fougeron, Barbara Kühnert, Mariapaola D’Imperio, and Nathalie Vallée (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 10, pp. 91–111. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Cysouw, Michael (2005) Quantitative methods in typology. In Gabriel Altmann, Reinhard Köhler, and R. Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative Linguistics: An International Handbook, pp. 554–78. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Cysouw, Michael (2010) On the probability distribution of typological frequencies. In Christian Ebert, Gerhard Jäger, and Jens Michaelis (eds.), The Mathematics of Language, pp. 29–35. Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

Cysouw, Michael, Mihai Albu, and Andreas Dress (2007) Analyzing feature consistency using dissimilarity matrices. Strachtypologie & Universalienforschung, 61(3): 263–279.Find this resource:

Dąbrowska, Eva, and Elena Lieven (2005) Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16: 437–74.Find this resource:

Daelemans, Walter, and Antal van den Bosch (2005) Memory-Based Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dahan, Delphine, and Michael K. Tanenhaus (2004) Continuous Mapping From Sound to Meaning in Spoken-Language Comprehension: Immediate Effects of Verb-Based Thematic Constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30: 498–513.Find this resource:

Dahan, Delphine, James S. Magnuson, Michael K. Tanenhaus, and Ellen M. Hogan (2001) Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: evidence for lexical competition. Language and Cognitive Processes 16: 507–34.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary (1993) The Syntax of Anaphoric Binding. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary (ed.) (1999) Semantics and Syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar: The Resource Logic Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary (2001) Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary, and Ronald M. Kaplan (2000) Feature indeterminacy and feature resolution. Language 74: 759–98.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary, Ronald M. Kaplan, and Tracy Holloway King (2001) Weak crossover and the absence of traces. In Butt and King (2001a: 66–82). (p. 1041) Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary, Ronald M. Kaplan, and Tracy Holloway King (2007) The absence of traces: evidence from weak crossover. In Annie Zaenen, Jane Simpson, Tracy Holloway King, Jane Grimshaw, Joan Maling, and Chris Manning (eds.), Architectures, Rules, and Preferences: Variations on Themes by Joan W. Bresnan, p. 27. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary, Ronald M. Kaplan, John T. Maxwell III, and Annie Zaenen (eds.) (1995) Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary, John Lamping, and Vijay Saraswat (1993) LFG semantics via constraints. Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the European ACL, pp. 97–105. European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, University of Utrecht.Find this resource:

Damasio, A.R. (1992) Aphasia. New England Journal of Medicine 326: 531–9.Find this resource:

Damasio, A., and N. Geschwind (1985) Anatomical localization in clinical neuropsychology. In J. A. M. Frederiks (ed.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 45 (Revised Series 1 ), pp. 7–22. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Damasio, H., T. J. Grabowski, D. Tranel, R. Hichwa, and A. R. Damasio (1996) A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature 380: 499–505.Find this resource:

Damasio, H., D. Tranel, T. Grabowski, R. Adolphs, and A. Damasio (2004) Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition 92: 179–229.Find this resource:

Darnell, Michael, Edith Moravcsik, Frederick Newmeyer, Michael Noonan, and Kathleen Wheatley (eds.) (1999) Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. 1: General Papers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Darwin, Charles (1859[1964]) The Origin of Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Davidson, David (1967) The logical form of action sentences. In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, pp. 81–94. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Find this resource:

Davies, Ian R. L. (1998) A study of colour grouping in three languages: a test of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology 89: 433–52.Find this resource:

Davies, Ian R. L., and Greville G. Corbett (1997) A cross-cultural study of colour grouping: evidence for weak linguistic relativity. British Journal of Psychology 88: 493–517.Find this resource:

Davies, Ian R. L., Paul T. Sowden, David T. Jerrett, Tiny Jerrett and Greville G. Corbett (1998) A cross-cultural study of English and Setswana speakers on a colour triads task: a test of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology 89: 1–15.Find this resource:

Davies, William D., and Stanley Dubinsky (eds.) (2004) The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Davis, Wayne A. (1998) Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Davis, Wayne A. (2007) How normative is implicature? Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1655–72.Find this resource:

Dawkins, Richard (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dawkins, Richard (1986) The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton.Find this resource:

Dayal, Veneeta (1999) Bare NPs, reference to kinds and incorporation. Proceedings of SALT 9. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Find this resource:

Dayal, Veneeta (2004) Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 393–450.Find this resource:

De Beule, J., L. Steels (2005) Hierarchy in Fluid Construction Grammar. In U Furbach (ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual German Conference on AI, KI 2005, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (vol. 3698), pp. 1–15. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Find this resource:

de Jorio, Andrea (2000[1832]) Gesture in Naples and Gesture in Classical Antiquity, a translation of La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano [Gestural Expression of the Ancients in the Light of Neapolitan Gesturing ]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (p. 1042) Find this resource:

de Lacy, Paul (2002a) The formal expression of markedness. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

de Lacy, Paul (2002b) The interaction of tone and stress in Optimality Theory. Phonology 19: 1–32.Find this resource:

de Lacy, Paul (2004) Markedness conflation in Optimality Theory. Phonology 21: 145–99.Find this resource:

de Lacy, Paul (2007) Freedom, interpretability, and the Loop. In Sylvia Blaho, Patrick Bye, and Martin Krämer (eds.), Freedom of Analysis?, pp. 86–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

de Villiers, Jill G., and Peter A. de Villiers (2000) Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. In P. Mitchell and K. J. Riggs (eds.), Children’s Reasoning and the Mind, pp. 191–228. Hove: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

de Villiers, Jill G., and Peter A. de Villiers (2003) Language for thought: coming to understand false beliefs. In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind, pp. 335–84. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

de Waal, Frans (2001) The Ape and the Sushi Master. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Deacon, Terrence (1997) The Symbolic Species. New York: Norton.Find this resource:

Deane, Paul (1992) Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Decety, Jean, and Philip L. Jackson (2006) A social neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15: 54–8.Find this resource:

Decety, Jean, and Jessica A. Sommerville (2003) Shared representations between self and other:a social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 527–33.Find this resource:

Dediu, Dan. (2011) Are languages really independent from genes? If not, what would a genetic bias affecting language diversity look like? Human Biology 83: 279–96.Find this resource:

Dediu, Dan, and Robert D. Ladd (2007) Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 10944–9.Find this resource:

Delfitto, Denis, and Jan Schroten (1991) Bare plurals and the number affix in DP. Probus 3: 155–85.Find this resource:

Dell, François, and Mohamed Elmedlaoui (1985) Syllabic consonants and syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7: 105–30.Find this resource:

Demestre, Josep, Sheila Meltzer, José García-Albea, and Andreu Vigil (1999) Identifying the null aubject: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 293–312.Find this resource:

Dempster, A., N. Laird, and D. Rubin (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 39: 1–38.Find this resource:

Deng, Li, and Jeff Ma (2000) Spontaneous speech recognition using a statistical coarticulatory model for the vocal-tract-resonance dynamics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108: 3036–48.Find this resource:

Dennett, Daniel C. (1995) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.Find this resource:

Dennis, Simon (2005) An exemplar-based approach to unsupervised parsing. Proceedings of the Twenty Seventh Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Find this resource:

di Cristo, Albert (1998) Intonation in French. In Daniel Hirst and Albert Di Cristo (eds.), Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, pp. 195–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria, and Edwin Williams (1987) On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Dial, Kenneth E., Brandon D. Jackson, and Paolo Segre (2008) A fundamental avian wingstroke provides new perspective on the evolution of flight. Nature 451: 985–89. (p. 1043) Find this resource:

Dickens, Patrick. (1992) Ju/’hoan grammar. TS, Johannesburg.Find this resource:

Dickens, Patrick (2005) A Concise Grammar of Ju/’hoan with a Ju/’hoan-English Glossary and a Subject Index, ed. Rainer Vossen and Megan Biesele. Cologne: Köppe.Find this resource:

Diehl, Randy L., and Keith R. Kluender (1989) On the objects of speech perception. Ecological Psychology 1: 121–44.Find this resource:

Diehl, Randy L., Andrew J. Lotto, and Lori L. Holt (2004) Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 149–79.Find this resource:

Diessel, Holger (1999) Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Diessel, Holger (2005) The Acquisition of Complex Sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Diewald, Gabriele (1997) Grammatikalisierung: eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Dik, Simon C. (1978) Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

Dik, Simon C. (1986) On the notion ‘functional explanation’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1: 11–52.Find this resource:

Dik, Simon C. (1997) The Theory of Functional Grammar, vols. 1 and 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (2000) Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo-Saharan languages. Anthropological Linguistics 42: 214–61.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (1972) The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (1982) Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? And Other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (1997) The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (2004) Adjective classes in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Adjective Classes: A Cross-linguistic Typology, pp. 1–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (2009) Basic Linguistic Theory. Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (2010–2012) Basic linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W., and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (2002) Word: a typological framework. In R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A Cross-linguistic Typology, pp. 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher 35: 125–9.Find this resource:

Docherty, Gerard, and Norma Mendoza-Denton (2012) Speaker-related variation— sociolinguistic factors. In Abigail C. Cohn, Cécile Fougeron, and Marie Huffman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology, pp. 43–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Docherty, Gerard, Paul Foulkes, Jenny Tillotson, and Dominic Watt (2006) On the scope of phonological learning: issues arising from socially structured variation. In Louis Goldstein, D. H. Whalen, and Catherine T. Best (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 8, pp. 494–21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Dockrell, Julie, and McShane, John (1990) Young children’s use of phrase structure and inflectional information in form-class assignments of novel nouns and verbs. First Language 10: 127–40.Find this resource:

Dodd, Barbara. (1975) Children’s understanding of their own phonological forms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 27: 165–72. (p. 1044) Find this resource:

Dodge, Ellen (2010) Conceptual and constructional composition. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Dodge, Ellen, and John Bryant (2012) Computational Cognitive Linguistics: An Embodied Construction Grammar analysis of transitive constructions. In Boas, Hans C. (ed.), Computational Approaches to Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. Chapter 2.Find this resource:

Dodge, Ellen, and George Lakoff (2005) Image schemas: from linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In Beate Hampe (ed.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 57–91. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Dodwell, Charles R. (2000) Anglo-Saxon Gestures and the Roman Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dolitsky, Marlene (1983) The birth of grammatical morphemes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 12: 353–60.Find this resource:

Donnellan, Keith S. (1966) Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75: 281–304.Find this resource:

Donohue, Mark, Simon Musgrave, Bronwen Whiting, and Søren Wichmann (2011) Typological feature analysis models linguistic geography. Language 87: 369–83.Find this resource:

Doron, Edith (2003) Bare singular reference to kinds. Proceedings of SALT 13, Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, Ithaca, NY.Find this resource:

Dowty, David R. (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Dowty, David R. (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619.Find this resource:

Dowty, David R. (2007) Compositionality as an empirical problem. In C. Barker and P. Jacobson (eds.), Direct Compositionality, pp. 23–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Drach, Erich (1937) Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre. Frankfurt am Main. (Usually cited from 4th edn, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1963.)Find this resource:

Drachman, Gaberell (1978) Child language and language change: a conjecture and some refutations. In Jaček Fisiak (ed.), Recent Developments in Historical Phonology, pp. 123–44. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Drager, Katie (2010) Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4: 473–80.Find this resource:

Draper, B. A., R. T. Collins, J. Brolio, A. R. Hanson, and E. M. Riseman (1989) The schema system. International Journal of Computer Vision 2: 209–50.Find this resource:

Drew, Paul (1981) ‘Adults’ corrections of children’s mistakes’, in P. French and M. MacLure (eds.), Adult–Child Conversations. London: Croom Helm, 244–67.Find this resource:

Drew, Paul (1997) ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69–101.Find this resource:

Dromi, Esther (1987) Early Lexical Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1989a) Article–noun order. Chicago Linguistic Society 25: 83–97.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1989b) Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13: 257–92.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1992) The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1997) Are grammatical relations universal? In Bybee et al. (1997: 115–43).Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1998) Why statistical universals are better than absolute universals. Chicago Linguistics Society 33: 123–45.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2000) Counting genera vs. counting languages. Linguistic Typology 4: 334–50. (p. 1045) Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2002) Case distinctions, rich verb agreement, and word order type (comments on Hawkins’ paper). Theoretical Linguistics 28: 151–7.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2005a) Order of subordinator and adverbial subordinate clause. In WALS, pp. 382–5.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2005b) Order of subject, object, and verb. In In WALS, pp. 386–9.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2005c) Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. In WALS, pp. 378–81.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2005d) Definite articles. In WALS, pp. 154–7.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2005e) Indefinite articles. In WALS, pp. 158–61.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2005f) Order of adposition and noun phrase. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 346–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2005g) Order of genitive and noun. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 350–3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2005h) Polar questions. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 470–3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2006a) Functionalism and the theory-metalanguage confusion. In Wiebe et al. (2006: 27–59).Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2006b) Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Felix Ameka, Alan Dench, and Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing, pp. 207–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2007) Noun phrase structure. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Complex Constructions, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 2, 2nd edn, pp. 151–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

DuBois, John (1985) Competing motivations. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, pp. 343–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Duncan, Susan (2002) Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture 2: 183–206.Find this resource:

Dunn, Michael J., Simon J. Greenhill, Stephen C. Levinson, and Russell, D. Gray (2011) Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473: 79–82.Find this resource:

Durie, Mark (1985) A Grammar of Acehnese. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Durie, Mark (1987) Grammatical relations in Acehnese. Studies in Language 11: 365–99.Find this resource:

Durrell, Martin (2002) Hammer’s German Grammar and Usage, 4th edn. London: Arnold.Find this resource:

Durrleman, Stephanie (2007) The syntax of Jamaican Creole: a cartographic perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Find this resource:

Dutcher, Katharine, and Mary Paster (2008) Contour Tone Distribution in Luganda. In Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 123–131. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Find this resource:

Ebert, Karen H. (1991) Vom Verbum dicendi zur Konjunktion: Ein Kapitel universaler Grammatikentwicklung. In Bisang and Rinderknecht (1991: 77–95).Find this resource:

Eimas, Peter D., Einar R. Siqueland, Peter Jusczyk, and James Vigorito (1971) Speech perception in infants Science 171: 303–6.Find this resource:

Eimas, Peter D., Einar R. Siqueland, Peter W. Jusczyk, and James Vigorito (1971) Speech perception in infants. Science 209: 1140–1. (p. 1046) Find this resource:

Eisenberg, Peter (2006) Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik, vol. 2:Der Satz, 3rd edn. Stuttgart: Metzler.Find this resource:

Elenbaas, Nine, and René Kager (1999) Ternary rhythm and the Lapse constraint. Phonology 16: 273–330.Find this resource:

Ellis, Nick C. (2002) Frequency effects in language processing and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143–88.Find this resource:

Ellis, Nick C., and Diane Larsen-Freeman (2006) Language emergence: implications for applied linguistics (introduction to the special issue). Applied Linguistics 27.4: 558–89.Find this resource:

Ellsworth, Michael, Kyoko Ohara, Carlos Subirats, and Thomas Schmidt (2006) Frame-semantic analysis of motion scenarios in English, German, Spanish, and Japanese. Fourth International Conference on Construction Grammar (Tokyo).Find this resource:

Elman, James L., and Jeffrey L. McClelland (1986) Exploiting the lawful variability in the speech wave. In Joseph S. Perkell and Dennis H. Klatt (eds.), Invariance and Variability of Speech Processes, pp. 360–80. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Find this resource:

Elman, Jeff, and Elizabeth Bates (1997) Response to letters. Science 276: 1180.Find this resource:

Emanatian, Michele. (1992) Chagga ‘come’ and ‘go’: metaphor and the development of tenseaspect. Studies in Language 16: 1–33.Find this resource:

Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer (2007) Distributed morphology and the syntax–morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, pp. 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Emonds, Joseph (1970) Root and Structure Preserving Transformations. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Find this resource:

Emonds, J. (1978) The verbal complex V′ – V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 151–75.Find this resource:

Emons, Rudolf (1974) Valenzen englischer Prädikatsverben. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Enç, Murvet (1991) The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–25.Find this resource:

Enfield, Nicholas J. (2005) Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeat Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.Find this resource:

Enfield, Nicholas J. (2012) ‘Reference in Conversation’, In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, pp. 433–54. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Enfield, Nick J. (2000) On linguocentrism. In M. Pütz and M. Verspoor (eds.), Explorations in Linguistic Relativity, pp. 125–57. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Endo, Yoshio (2007) Locality and Information Structure: A Cartographic Approach to Japanese. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Engel, Ulrich (1988) Deutsche Grammatik: Vollständige Darstellung der deutschen Gegen-wartssprache. Heidelberg: Groos.Find this resource:

Engel, Ulrich (1994) Syntax der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Berlin: Schmidt.Find this resource:

Engel, Ulrich (1999) Deutsch-polnische kontrastive Grammatik (2 vols). Heidelberg: Groos.Find this resource:

Engel, Ulrich (2004) Deutsche Grammatik: Neubearbeitung. Munich: Iudicium.Find this resource:

Engel, Ulrich, Mikai Isbasescu, Speranţa Stănescu, and Octavian Nicolae (1993) Kontrastive Grammatik deutsch-rumänisch. Heidelberg: Groos.Find this resource:

Engel, Ulrich and Pavica Mrazović serbokroatisch (2 vols). Munich: Sagner. (eds.) (1986) Kontrastive Grammatik deutsch-Find this resource:

Engelen, Bernhard (2003) Die Wortartenlehre bei Lucien Tesnière. In Ágel et al. (2003: 100–108).Find this resource:

Epstein, Samuel D., Erich Groat, Ruriko Kawashima, and Hisatsugu Kitahara (1998) The Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Erbaugh, Mary S. (1992) The acquisition of Mandarin. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 3, pp. 373–455. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (p. 1047) Find this resource:

Ericsson, K. Anders, and Walter Kintsch (1995) Long term working memory. Psychological Review 102: 211–45.Find this resource:

Erman, Britt, and Beatrice Warren (2000) The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20: 29–62.Find this resource:

Eroms, Hans-Werner (2000) Syntax der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Eroms, Hans-Werner, and Hans Jürgen Heringer (2003) Dependenz und lineare Ordnung. In Ágel et al. (2003: 247–63).Find this resource:

Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1972) On sociolinguistic rules: alternation and co-occurrence. In J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics, pp. 213–50. New York: Holt.Find this resource:

Escandell Vidal, Victoria (1998) Intonation and procedural encoding: the case of Spanish interrogatives. In V. Rouchota and A. Jucker (eds.), Current Issues in Relevance Theory, pp. 169–204. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Escandell Vidal, Victoria (2004) Norms and principles: putting social and cognitive pragmatics together. In R. Márquez-Reiter and M.E. Placencia (eds.), Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, pp. 347–71. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Eschenberg, A. (2004) The operator projection, Omaha and diachronic syntax in RRG. In Nolan (2004a: 72–91).Find this resource:

Eschenberg, A. (2005) The article system of UmoNhoN (Siouan). PhD dissertation, City University at Buffalo.Find this resource:

Estigarribia, Bruno (2010) Facilitation by variation: right-to-left learning of English yes/no questions. Cognitive Science 34: 68–93.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas D. (2003) Bininj Gun-Wok: A Pan-Dialectal Grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune (2 vols). Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas (2003) Context, culture, and structuration in the languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 13–40.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicolas D., Duncan Brown, and Greville Corbett (2001) Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism: a Network Morphology analysis. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000, pp. 187–231. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas D., and Toshiki Osada (2005) Mundari: the myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9: 351–90.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas D., and David Wilkins (2000) In the mind’s ear: the semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76: 546–92.Find this resource:

Evans, Vyvyan (2004) The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken (2006) The Cognitive Linguistics Enterprise: An Overview. In Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken (eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, pp. 303–16. London: Equinox.Find this resource:

Everett, Dan (2002) Towards an RRG theory of morphology. Lecture delivered at the 2002 International Conference on Role and Reference Grammar (University of La Rioja).Find this resource:

Everett, Dan (2008) Wari ‘intentional state constructions’. In Van Valin (2008b: 381–409).Find this resource:

Ewen, Colin J., and Harry van der Hulst (2001) The Phonological Sturcture of Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Falk, Yehuda (2001) Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Parallel Constraint-Based Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Falk, Yehuda (2006) Subjects and Universal Grammar: An Explanatory Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Fant, Gunnar (1960) Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton. (p. 1048) Find this resource:

Farkas, Donka (2002) Specificity distinctions. Journal of Semantics 19: 1–31.Find this resource:

Farkas, Donka, and Henriëtte de Swart (2003) The Semantics of Incorporation: From Argument Structure to Discourse Transparency. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Farkas, Donka, and Henriëtte de Swart (2007) Article choice in plural generics. Lingua 117: 1657–76.Find this resource:

Farkas, Donka, and Henriëtte de Swart (2009) Stability and variation in article choice: generic and non-generic contexts. In Monika Rathert and Anastasia Giannakidou (eds.), Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization, pp. 188–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Farrell, Patrick (2005) Grammatical Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fauconnier, Gilles (1985) Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press/Bradford.Find this resource:

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner (2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Fausey, Caitlin M., and Teenie Matlock (2011) Can grammar win elections? Political Psychology 32: 563–74.Find this resource:

Federmeier, K.D. (2007) Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 44: 491–505.Find this resource:

Feilke, Helmuth (1998) Idiomatische Prägung. In Ingrid Barz and Günther Öhlschläger (eds.), Zwischen Grammatik und Lexikon, pp. 69–80. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Feilke, Helmuth (2004) Kontext—Zeichen—Kompetenz: Wortverbindungen unter sprachtheoretischem Aspekt. In Kathrin Steyer (ed.), Wortverbindungen—mehr oder weniger fest: Jahrbuch 2003 des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache, pp. 41–64. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Feldman, Jerome (2006) From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Feldman, Jerome (2010) Embodied language, best-fit analysis, and formal compositionality. Physics of Life Reviews 7: 385–410.Find this resource:

Feldman, Jerome, and Luca Gilardi (2012) Extending ECG to communities, mental spaces and maps. In Boas, Hans C. (ed.), Computational Approaches to Construction Grammar and Frame Semantics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. Chapter 6.Find this resource:

Feldman, Jerome, and Srini Narayanan (2004) Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language 89: 385–92.Find this resource:

Feldman, Naomi H., Emily B. Myers, Katherine S. White, Thomas L. Griffiths, and James L. Morgan (2013) Word-level information influences phonetic learning in adults and infants. Cognition 127: 427–38.Find this resource:

Ferguson, Charles A., and Carol B. Farwell (1975) Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language 51: 419–39.Find this resource:

Fernald, Anne, Amy Perfors, and Virginia A. Marchman (2006) Picking up speed in understanding: speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the second year. Developmental Psychology 42: 98–116.Find this resource:

Ferreira, F., K. Christianson, and A. Hollingworth (2001) Misinterpretations of gardenpath sentences: implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30: 3–20.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Fernanda, Kiel Christianson, and Andrew Hollingworth (2001) Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30: 3–20.Find this resource:

Ferrer i Cancho, Ramon (2004) Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words. Physical Review E 70: 056135. (p. 1049) Find this resource:

Ferrier, L. (1978) Some observations of error in context. In N. Waterson and C. Snow (eds.), The Development of Communication, pp. 301–9. New York: Wiley.Find this resource:

Fidelholz, James (1975) Word frequency and vowel reduction in English. Chicago Linguistic Society 11: 200–213.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1968) The case for case. In Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, pp. 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles (1976) The need for frame semantics within linguistics. Statistical Methods in Linguistics 12: 5–29.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1977a) Scenes-and-frames semantics. In Antonio Zampoli (ed.), Linguistic Structures Processing, pp. 55–81. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1977b) The case for case reopened. In P. Cole and J. Sadock (eds.), Grammatical Relations, pp. 59–81. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistics Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di semantica 6.2: 222–54.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1986) Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. Berkeley Linguistics Society 12: 95–107.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1988) The mechanisms of Construction Grammar. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 35–55.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1999) Inversion and constructional inheritance. In G. Webelhuth, J.- P. Koenig, and A. Kathol (eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, pp. 113–28. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (2003) Double-decker definitions: the role of frames in meaning explanations. Sign Language Studies (Gallaudet University) 3: 263–95.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., and Beryl T. S. Atkins (1992) Towards a frame-based organization of the lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer and E. Kitay (eds.), Frames, Fields, and Contrast: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization, pp. 75–102. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., and Beryl T. S. Atkins (1994) Starting where the dictionaries stop: the challenge for computational lexicography. In Beryl T. S. Atkins and A. Zampolli (eds.), Computational Approaches to the Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 349–93.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., and Beryl T. S. Atkins (1997) FrameNet and lexicographic relevance. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Granada).Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., and Paul Kay (1995) Construction Grammar coursebook. MS, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary C. O’Connor (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language 64: 501–38.Find this resource:

Fine, Jonathan (2006) Language in Psychiatry: A Handbook of Clinical Practice. London: Equinox.Find this resource:

Finkbeiner, M., J. Nicol, K. Nakumura, and D. Greth (2002) The role of language in memory for actions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31: 447–57.Find this resource:

Finn, Riona, Mary Hearne, Andy Way, and Josef van Genabith (2006) GF-DOP: grammatical feature data-oriented parsing. Proceedings of the 11 th International Conference on LFG (Konstanz).Find this resource:

Firth, John R. (1968) A new approach to grammar. In F. R. Palmer (ed.), Selected Papers of J. R. Firth, 1 95 21959, pp. 114–25. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (p. 1050) Find this resource:

Fischer, Klaus (1997) German–English Verb Valency: A Contrastive Analysis. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

Fischer, Klaus (1999) Verb valency: an attempt at conceptual clarification. Web Journal of Modern Language Linguistics 4–5. (http://wjmll.ncl.ac.uk/issue04-05/fischer.htm).Find this resource:

Fischer, Klaus (2003) Verb, Aussage, Valenzdefinition und Valenzrealisierung: auf dem Weg zu einer typologisch adäquaten Valenztheorie. In Klaas Willems, Ann Coene, and Jeroen Van Pottelberge (eds.), Valenztheorie: Neuere Perspektiven, pp. 14–64. Ghent: Akademia Press.Find this resource:

Fischer, Klaus (2007) Temporary ambiguity of German and English term complements. In Thomas Herbst and Katrin Götz-Votteler (eds.), Valency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues, pp. 229–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Fischer, Klaus (2013) Satzstrukturen im Deutschen und Englischen. Typologie und Textrealisierung. Berlin: Akademie (Konvergenz und Divergenz 1).Find this resource:

Fischer, Olga, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon (eds.) (2004) Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Fischer, Olga, Anette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein (eds.) (2000) Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Fiser, József, and Richard N. Aslin (2002) Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 15822–6.Find this resource:

Fišiak, Jaček (ed.) (1985) Historical Semantics, Historical Word Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2011) Unity and diversity in human language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366: 376–88.Find this resource:

Fitch, Tecumseh, Marc Hauser, and Noam Chomsky (2005) The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition 97: 179–210.Find this resource:

Flagg, Elissa J., Janis E. Oram Cardy, and Timothy P. L. Roberts (2006) MEG detects neural consequences of anomalous nasalization in vowel-consonant pairs. Neuroscience Letters 397: 263–8.Find this resource:

Flanagan, James L. (1965) Speech Analysis, Synthesis and Perception. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Fleischman, Suzanne (1982) The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Flemming, Edward S. (1995) Auditory representations in phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Flickinger, Daniel (1987) Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Find this resource:

Flier, Michael S. (ed.) (1974) Slavic Forum: Essays in Linguistics and Literature. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet Dean (1978) Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 427–73.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet Dean (1989) Empty categories in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 4: 155–209.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry A. (1983) The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Foley, William, and R. D. Van Valin, Jr. (1977) On the viability of the notion of ‘subject’ in universal grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 3: 293–320.Find this resource:

Foley, William, and R. D. Van Valin, Jr. (1984) Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Fong, Sandiway, and Robert Berwick (2008) Treebank parsing and knowledge of language: a cognitive perspective. Proceedings CogSci 2008 (Washington, DC).Find this resource:

Fontenelle, Thierry (ed.) (2003) International Journal of Lexicography 16.3 (special issue on FrameNet). (p. 1051) Find this resource:

Ford, Cecilia. E., Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (1996) Practices in the construction of turns: The TCU revisited. Pragmatics 6: 427–54.Find this resource:

Forrester, Michael, and Sarah M. Cherington (2009) The development of other-related conversational skills: A case study of conversational repair during the early years. First Language 29: 166–91.Find this resource:

Fortescue, Michel, and Lise Lennert Olsen (1992) The acquisition of West Greenlandic. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 3, pp. 111–220. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Foulkes, Paul, and Gerard Docherty (2006) The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34: 409–38.Find this resource:

Foulkes, Paul, James M. Scobbie, and Dominic Watt (2010) Sociophonetics. In William J. Hardcastle, John Laver, and Fiona E. Gibbon (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (2nd edition), pp. 703–54. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Fowler, Carol A. (1986) An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics 14: 3–28.Find this resource:

Fowler, Carol A. (1994) Invariants, specifiers, cues: an investigation of locus equations as information for place of articulation. Perception & Psychophysics 55: 597–610.Find this resource:

Fowler, Carol A. (1996) Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99: 1730–41.Find this resource:

Fowler, Carol A. (2006) Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast. Perception & Psychophysics 68: 161–77.Find this resource:

Fowler, Carol A. (2007) Speech production. In M. Gareth Gaskell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, pp. 489–501. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fox, Barbara A., and Sandra A. Thompson (1990) A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66: 297–316.Find this resource:

Fox, Barbara, Hayashi, Makoto, and Robert Jasperson (1996) A Cross-Linguistic Study of Syntax and Repair. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 185–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Fox, Barbara, Thompson, Sandra, Ford, Cecilia, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012) Conversation analysis and Linguistics. In J. Sidnell, and T. Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 726–40. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Fox, Danny (2000) Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fox-Keller, Evelyn (2002) Making Sense of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt (1996) Grammaticalization of the Complex Sentence: A Case Study in Chadic. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, and Erin Shay (2003) Explaining Language Structure through Systems Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Frampton, John, and Sam Gutmann (2002) Crash-proof syntax. In Samuel D. Epstein and T. Daniel Seely (eds.), Explanation and Derivation in the Minimalist Program, pp. 90–105. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Francis, G., S. Hunston, and E. Manning (eds.) (1996) Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Find this resource:

Francis, G., S. Hunston, and E. Manning (eds.) (1998) Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Find this resource:

Frank, Anette, Tracy Holloway King, Jonas Kuhn, and John T. Maxwell, III (1998) Optimality Theory style constraint ranking in large-scale LFG grammars. In Butt and King (1998b), pp. 367–97. (p. 1052) Find this resource:

Frank, Anette, and Josef van Genabith (2001) LL-based semantics construction for LTAG— and what it teaches us about the relation between LFG and LTAG. In Butt and King (2001a: 104–26).Find this resource:

Frank, Anette, and Annie Zaenen (2002) Tense in LFG: syntax and morphology. In Hans Kamp and Uwe Reyle (eds.), How Do We Say WHEN It Happens? Contributions to the Theory of Temporal Reference in Natural Language. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Franklin, K. (1971) A Grammar of Kewa, New Guinea. Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

Frascarelli, Mara, and Hinterhölzl, Roland (2007) Types of topics in German and Italian. In S. Winkler and K. Schwabe (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, pp. 87–116. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Frascarelli, Mara, and Annarita Puglielli (2008) Focus in the Force-Fin system: information structure in Cushitic languages. In Enoch Aboh, K. Hartmann, and M. Zimmermann (eds.), Focus Strategies: Evidence from African Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Frawley, William (1992) Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Frazier, Lyn (1987) Sentence processing: a tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading, pp. 559–86. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Frazier, Lyn (1998) Getting there (slowly). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27: 123–46.Find this resource:

Frazier, Lyn, and Charles Clifton (1989) Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes 4: 93–126.Find this resource:

Frazier, Lyn, and Charles Clifton (1996) Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Freeman, Jonathan B., Rick Dale, and Thomas A. Farmer (2011) Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology 2: 1–6.Find this resource:

Freidin, Robert, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud (2001) Exquisite connections: some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory. Lingua 111: 639–66.Find this resource:

Fried, Mirjam, and Hans C. Boas (eds.) (2005) Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Friederici, A.D. (2002) Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 78–84.Find this resource:

Friederici, A.D. (2011) The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiological Reviews 91: 1357–92.Find this resource:

Friedman, Lynn A. (ed.) (1977) On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Friginal, Eric (2008) Linguistic variation in the discourse of outsourced call centers. Discourse Studies 10: 715–36.Find this resource:

Friginal, Eric (2009) The Language of Outsourced Call Centers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Frisch, S., M. Schlesewsky (2001) The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. Neuroreport 12: 3391–94.Find this resource:

Frishberg, Nancy (1975) Arbitrariness and iconicity: historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51: 676–710.Find this resource:

Friston, K. J., J. Ashburner, S. J. Kiebel, T. E. Nichols, and W. D. Penny (eds.) (2007) Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images: New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Frith, Uta, and Christopher D. Frith (2003) Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 358: 459–73.Find this resource:

Fujii, Seiko (2005) An analysis of communication verbs in the Japanese FrameNet (in Japanese) Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association (JCLA 5), pp. 625–8. (p. 1053) Find this resource:

Fukui, Naoki (1995) Theory of Projection in Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Fukui, Naoki (2006) Theoretical Comparative Syntax. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Furuya, Kaori (2008) DP hypothesis for Japanese ‘bare’ noun phrases. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 149–62.Find this resource:

Fuster, J. M. (2004) Upper processing stages of the perception-action cycle. Trends Cognitive Science 8: 143–5.Find this resource:

Gahl, Susanne, and Susan Garnsey (2004) Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80: 748–75.Find this resource:

Gahl, Susanne, and Alan Yu (eds.) (2006) Special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. Linguistic Review 23.3.Find this resource:

Gaifman, Haim (1965) Dependency systems and phrase structure systems. Information and Control 8: 304–37.Find this resource:

Gair, James, and John Paolillo (1997) Sinhala. Munich: Lincom-Europa.Find this resource:

Galantucci, Bruno, Carol A. Fowler, and M. T. Turvey (2006) The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13: 361–77.Find this resource:

Galilei, Galileo (1962[1632]) Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Galilei, Galileo (1974[1638]) Two New Sciences. Toronto: Wall & Thompson.Find this resource:

Gallagher, Tanya M. (1977) Revision behaviors in the speech of normal children developing language. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 20: 303–18.Find this resource:

Gallese, Vittorio, and George Lakoff (2005) The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensorymotor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22: 455–79.Find this resource:

Gansel, Christina (2003) Valenz und Kognition. In Ágel et al. (2003: 422–44).Find this resource:

Garagnani, M., T. Wennekers, and F. Pulvermüller (2008) A neuroanatomically-grounded Hebbian learning model of attention-language interactions in the human brain. European Journal of Neuroscience 27: 492–513.Find this resource:

Gärdenfors, Peter (2000) Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Gardner, Beatrice T., and R. A. Gardner (1971) Two-way communication with an infant chimpanzee. In Allan Schrier and Fred Stollnitz (eds.), Behavior of Non-human Primates, vol. 4, pp. 117–84. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice-Hall.Find this resource:

Garfinkel, Harold (1974) On the origins of the term ‘ethnomethodology’. In R. Turner (ed.) Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 15–18.Find this resource:

Garnsey, Susan, Michael Tanenhaus, and Robert Chapman (1989) Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18: 51–60.Find this resource:

Garrett, Andrew, and Keith Johnson (2013) Phonetic bias in sound change. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.), Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to Phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Garrod, Simon C. (2006) Psycholinguistic research methods. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 2: 251–7. Elsevier Ltd.Find this resource:

Gathercole, Susan E., and Alan D. Baddeley (1993) Working Memory and Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Gathercole, Virginia C. M., Eugenia Sebastián, and Pilar Soto (1999) The early acquisition of Spanish morphology: across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge? International Journal of Bilingualism 3: 133–82.Find this resource:

Gawron, Jean Mark (1988) Lexical Representations and the Semantics of Complementation. New York: Garland. (p. 1054) Find this resource:

Gawron, Jean Mark (2011) Frame semantics. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meanings, vol. 1, pp. 664–87. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Gazdar, Gerald (1979) Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. London: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Gazdar, Gerald (1981) Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155–84.Find this resource:

Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. Pullum, and I. Sag (1985) Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Geary, D. C. (2005) The Origin of Mind: The Evolution of Brain, Cognition and General Intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Find this resource:

Geeraerts, Dirk (2006) Introduction: a rough guide to cognitive linguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, pp. 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens (2007) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Geisler, Christer (2002) Investigating register variation in nineteenth-century English: a multi-dimensional comparison. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice, and D. Biber (eds.), Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, pp. 249–71. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gelman, Susan A., and Marjorie Taylor (1984) How two-year-old children interpret proper and common names for objects. Child Development 55: 1535–40.Find this resource:

Gentner, Dedre, and Lera Boroditsky (2001) Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, pp. 215–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gentner, Deidre and Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.) (2003) Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Gerken, LouAnn (1996) Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language 72: 683–712.Find this resource:

Gerkeny, Lou Ann (2002) Early sensitivity to linguistic form. Annual Review of Language Acquisition, 2: 1–36.Find this resource:

Gerken, Lou Ann, Barbara Landau, and R. Remez (1990) Function morphemes in young children’s speech perception and production. Developmental Psychology 26: 204–16.Find this resource:

Gerken, Lou Ann, Rachel Wilson, and William Lewis (2005) Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories. Journal of Child Language 32: 249–68.Find this resource:

Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (1990) Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Gervain, Judit, and Jacques Mehler (2010) Speech perception and language in the first year of life. Annual Review of Psychology 61: 191–218.Find this resource:

Geschwind, N. (1965) Disconnexion syndromes in animal and man. Brain: a journal of neurology 88: 237–94; 585–644.Find this resource:

Geschwind, Norman (1970) The organization of language and the brain. Science 170: 940–44.Find this resource:

Ghomeshi, Jila, Ray Jackendoff, Nicole Rosen, and Kevin Russell (2004) Contrastive focus reduplication in English (the ‘salad-salad’ paper). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 307–57.Find this resource:

Ghosh, Prasanta K., and Shrikanth Narayanan (2010) A generalized smoothness criterion for acoustic-to-articulatory inversion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128: 2162–72.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1991) Why idioms mean what they do. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120: 93–5. (p. 1055) Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1992) What do idioms really mean? Journal of Memory and Language 31: 485–506.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1994a) Figurative thought and language. In Morton A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, pp. 413–72. San Diego: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1994b) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1996) What’s cognitive about cognitive linguistics? In Eugene H. Casad (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, pp. 27–53. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2006) Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2007) Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, and Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 2–18. Amsterdam: John H. Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. (2012) Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: Embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (May issue): 1–16.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W., and Jennifer E. O’Brien (1990) Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition 36: 35–68.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W., and Teenie Matlock (2008) Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, pp. 161–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W., and Nandini P. Nayak (1991) Why idioms mean what they do. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120: 93–5.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W., Josephine M. Bogdonovich, Jeffrey R. Sykes, and Dale J. Barr (1997) Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 141–54.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W., Nandini P. Nayak, John L. Bolton, and Melissa E. Keppel (1989a) Speakers’ assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms. Memory & Cognition 17: 58–68.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W., Nandini P. Nayak, and Cooper Cutting (1989b) How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 576–93.Find this resource:

Gibson, Edward (2002) The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity Cognition 85: 79–112.Find this resource:

Gibson, Edward, Steve Piantadosi, and Kristina Fedorenko (2011) Using Mechanical Turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Language and Linguistics Compass 5: 509–24.Find this resource:

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Stefan Th. Gries (2009) Corpora and experimental methods: a state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5: 1–26.Find this resource:

Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Ivan A. Sag (2000) Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Girard, Jean-Yves (1987) Linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science 50: 1–102.Find this resource:

Girard, Jean-Yves, Paul Taylor, and Yves Lafont (1989) Proofs and Types. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gisborne, Nikolas (2001) The stative/dynamic contrast and argument linking. Language Sciences 23: 603–37.Find this resource:

Giusti, Giuliana (2002) The functional structure of noun phrases: a bare phrase structure approach. In G. Cinque (ed.), Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 1, pp. 54–90. New York: Oxford University Press. (p. 1056) Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1971) Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archaeologist’s field trip. Chicago Linguistics Society 7: 394–415.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1975a) Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo. In Li (1975: 47–112).Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1975b) Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Li (1975: 149–88).Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1979) On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1980) The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4: 333–77.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1981) On the development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica 2: 35–53.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1984) Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1989) Mind, Code and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1990a) Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1990b) Natural language learning and organized language teaching. In H. Burmeister and P. Rounds (eds.), Variability in Second Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 1 0th Second Language Research Forum (SLRF), pp. 61–84. Eugene: University of Oregon.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1991) The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics 30: 5–55.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1995) Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (2001) Syntax: An Introduction (2 vols). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (2002) Bio-Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (2005) Context as Other Minds: The Pragmatics of Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (2007) The ontogeny of complex verb phrases: how children learn to negotiate fact and desire. TS, University of Oregon.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (2008) The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, T., and Bertram F. Malle (eds.) (2002) The Evolution of Language out of Pre-language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, T., and Sue Savage-Rumbaugh (2006) Can apes learn grammar? A short detour into language evolution. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura, and Seyda Ozcaliskan (eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. London: Psychology Press, pp. 299–309.Find this resource:

Gladkova, Anna (2007a) Russian emotions, attitudes and values: selected topics in cultural semantics. PhD thesis, Australian National University.Find this resource:

Gladkova, Anna (2007b) Universal and language-specific aspects of propositional attitudes: Russian vs. English. In Andrea C. Schalley and Drew Khlentzos (eds.), Mental States, vol. 2: Language and Cognitive Structure, pp. 61–83. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Glenberg, Arthur, and Michael Kaschak (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 558–65.Find this resource:

Glenberg, Arthur M., and Vittorio Gallese (2012) Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex 48: 905–22.Find this resource:

Gnanadesikan, Amalia (2004) Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In René Kager, Joe Pater, and Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (1998) Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2001) Lexico-semantic universals: a critical overview. Linguistic Typology 5: 1–66. (p. 1057) Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2002) Ethnosyntax, ethnopragmatics, sign-functions, and culture. In N. J. Enfield (ed.), Ethnosyntax, pp. 52–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2003a) ‘Thinking’ across languages and cultures: six dimensions of variation. Cognitive Linguistics 14: 109–40.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2003b) Whorf meets Wierzbicka: variation and universals in language and thinking. Language Sciences 25: 393–432.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2003c) Dynamic ter- in Malay (Bahasa Melayu): a study in grammatical polysemy. Studies in Language 27: 287–322.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2006a) Ethnopragmatics: a new paradigm. In Goddard (2006b: 1–30).Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (ed.) (2006b) Ethnopragmatics: Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (ed.) (2008) Cross-Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2011) Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction (Revised 2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2012) Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics 50(3).Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka (2014) Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.) (1994) Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka (1997) Discourse and culture. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2: Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 231–57. London: Sage.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka (2002a) Semantic primes and universal grammar. In Goddard and Wierzbicka (2002b: vol. 1, 41–85).Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.) (2002b) Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings (2 vols). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.) (2004) Cultural Scripts. Special issue of Intercultural Pragmatics 1.2.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka (2007) NSM analyses of the semantics of physical qualities: sweet, hot, hard, heavy, rough, sharp in cross-linguistic perspective. Studies in Language 31: 765–800.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka (2009) Contrastive semantics of physical activity verbs: ‘cutting’ and ‘chopping’ in English, Polish, and Japanese. Language Sciences 31: 60–96.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka (2014) Men, women and children: The conceptual semantics of basic social categories. In Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka, Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff, Anna Wierzbicka, and Jock, Wong (forthcoming). “Walking” and “running” in English and German: The cross-linguistic semantics of verbs of human locomotion.Find this resource:

Goffman, Erving (1957) Alienation from Interaction. Human Relations 10: 47–60.Find this resource:

Goffman, Erving (1964) The Neglected Situation. American Anthropologist 66: 133–6.Find this resource:

Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Find this resource:

Goffman, Erving (1981) Footing. In Erving Goffman, Forms of Talk, 124–59. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. (p. 1058) Find this resource:

Göksun, Tilbe, Aylin Küntay, and Letitia R. Naigles (2008) Turkish children use mor-phosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning. Journal of Child Language 35: 291–323.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E. (2002) Surface generalizations: an alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics 13: 327–56.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E. (2005) Constructions, lexical semantics and the Correspondence Principle: accounting for generalizations and subregularities in the realization of arguments. In N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport (eds.), The Syntax of Aspect, pp. 211–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E. (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalizations in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E., Devin Casenhiser, and Nitya Sethuraman (2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 14: 289–316.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E., and Alex del Giudice (2005) Subject–auxiliary inversion: a natural category. Linguistic Review 22: 411–28.Find this resource:

Goldinger, Stephen D. (1996) Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22: 1166–83.Find this resource:

Goldinger, Stephen D. (2000) The role of perceptual episodes in lexical processing. In Anne Cutler, James McQueen, and Rian Zondervan (eds.), Proceedings of Spoken Word Access Processes, pp. 155–8. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Find this resource:

Goldsmith, John A. (1976) Autosegmental Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

Goldstein, K. (1948) Language and Language Disturbance. New York: Grune and Stratton.Find this resource:

Goldstein, Louis, and Carol A. Fowler (2003) Articulatory phonology: a phonology for public language use. In Niels O. Schiller and Antje S. Meyer (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production, pp. 159–207. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Gonzalez-Marquez, Monica, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, and Michael J. Spivey (eds.) (2007) Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John H. Benjamins.Find this resource:

Good, Jeff (1983) Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59: 781–819.Find this resource:

Good, Jeff (ed.) (2008) Linguistic Universals and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goodale, Melvin A. (2000) Perception and action in the human visual system. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neuroscience, 2nd edn, pp. 365–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Goodman, Joshua (2003) Efficient parsing of DOP with PCFG-reductions. In R. Bod, R. Scha, and K. Sima’an (eds.), Data-Oriented Parsing, pp. 125–46. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Goodman, Judith, Philip Dale, and Ping Li (2008) Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 35: 515–31.Find this resource:

Goodwin, Brian C., and Lynn E. Trainor (1983) The ontogeny and phylogeny of the Pentadactyl limb. In Brian C. Goodwin, Nigel Holder, and Christopher C. Wylie (eds.), Development and Evolution, pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–98.Find this resource:

Goodwin, Charles (1979) ‘The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation,’ In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 97–121. New York: Irvington.Find this resource:

Goodwin, C. (1986) Between and Within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies 9: 205–17. (p. 1059) Find this resource:

Goossens, Louis (1990) Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 323–40.Find this resource:

Gopnik, Alison, and Henry M. Wellman (1992) Why the child’s theory of mind is really a theory. Mind and Language 7: 145–71.Find this resource:

Gordon, Matthew (1999) Syllable weight: phonetics, phonology, and typology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Gould, Stephen Jay (1983) Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes. New York: Norton.Find this resource:

Gould, Stephen Jay (1989) Wonderful Life. New York: Norton.Find this resource:

Gould, Stephen Jay (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Gouskova, Maria (2003) Deriving economy: syncope in Optimality Theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available on the Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA 610, http://roa.rutgers.eduFind this resource:

Gouskova, Maria (2004) Relational hierarchies in Optimality Theory: the case of syllable contact. Phonology 21: 201–50.Find this resource:

Graybiel, Ann M. (1998) The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 70: 119–36.Find this resource:

Green, Georgia, M. (1996) Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1963) Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1966a) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg (1966b: 73–113).Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1966b) Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1969) Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In Jan Puhvel (ed.), Substance and Structure of Language, pp. 147–203. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1978a) Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. In Joseph Green-berg, Charles Ferguson, and Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 1, pp. 61–91. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.