Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 22 January 2020

Abstract and Keywords

‘All doctrines are concerned either with God or with visible and invisible things or with Providence and judgement about them’, pronounced Maximus in the Centuries on Love (Car. 1.78). The relationship between the divine and humanity in providence continued to concern Christian philosophers into the fourth century, especially John Chrysostom, the Cappadocians, and Evagrius Ponticus. Their speculations on divine providence, free will, the final restoration of all to God, and the origins of evil were taken up by Maximus the Confessor. His distinction between the gnomic and natural wills is now recognized as one of his major contributions to Byzantine understandings of spiritual anthropology, because it solved a long-standing philosophical problem inherent in divine providence’s government over humanity. This chapter considers the solutions to the problem that were offered by Sarapion of Thmuis, Evagrius, Gregory Nazianzen, and Gregory of Nyssa.

Keywords: Sarapion of Thmuis, Evagrius Ponticus, Gregory Nazianzen, Gregory of Nyssa, gnomic will, John Chrysostom, anthropology, providence

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.