Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 20 February 2020

Abstract and Keywords

Risk remains a puzzling concept. It is transdisciplinary in scope and multi-levelled in application. It emerged from practice, became theoretical, and has become practical again. Today it is a concept with unprecedented reach and organizing power, and for this reason is a source of fascination to social theorists and organization scholars alike. This chapter outlines a series of intersections between risk, social theory, and analyses of organization practice which share a common critique of risk individualism. These intersections suggest that risk is hybrid and multi-logic in nature. Specifically, at least three risk logics are entangled in practice, namely: anticipation (knowledge), resilience (ignorance), and auditability (blame). The chapter concludes by suggesting a dynamic theory of risk management practice as the contingent and changing mix of these three logics.

Keywords: risk, risk management, social theory, organizations, knowledge, ignorance, blame

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.