Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 18 August 2019

(p. 787) References

(p. 787) References

Abbi, A. (1992). Reduplication in South Asian Languages: An Areal, Typological and Historical Study. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Find this resource:

Ackema, P. and Neeleman, A. (2005). Word formation in Optimality Theory. In P. Štekauer and R. Lieber (eds). Handbook of Word Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 285–315.Find this resource:

Adams, V. (1973). An Introduction to Modern English Word-formation. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Adams, V. (2001). Complex Words in English. Harlow: Longman.Find this resource:

Agnihotri, R. K. (1998). Mixed codes and their acceptability. In R. K. Agnihotri, A. L. Khanna, and I. Sachdev (eds), Social Psychological Perspectives on Second Language Learning. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 215–230.Find this resource:

Ahland, C. (2010). Noun incorporation and predicate classifiers in Gumuz. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 31(2): 159–203.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (1996). Areal diffusion in northwest Amazonia: the case of Tariana. Anthropological Linguistics 38: 73–116.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2002). Language Contact in Amazonia. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2003). Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: new morphology and language contact. Journal of Linguistics 39: 1–29.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2006). Grammars in contact: a cross-linguistic perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, and R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–66.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2007). Typological distinctions in word formation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–65.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2008). The Manambu Language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2012). The Languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. and R. M. W. Dixon (eds) (2001). Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. and R. M. W. Dixon (eds) (2006). Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–162.Find this resource:

Aimard, P. (1975). Les jeux de mots de l’enfant. Villeurbanne: Simép Editions.Find this resource:

Ajello, R. (1998). Armenian. In A. G. Ramat, and P. Ramat (eds), The Indo-European Languages. London: Routledge, 197–227.Find this resource:

Akinlabi, A. (1994). Alignment constraints in ATR harmony. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 24: 1–18.Find this resource:

Akinlabi, A. (1996). Featural affixation. Journal of Linguistics 32: 239–289.Find this resource:

Akinlabi, A. (2011). Featural affixes. In M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume, and K. Rice (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 1945–1971.Find this resource:

Alamin, S., Schneider-Blum, G. and Dimmendaal, G. J. (2012). Finding your way in Tima. In A. Mietzner and U. Claudi (eds), Directionality in Grammar and Discourse: Case Studies from Africa. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe, 9–33. (p. 788) Find this resource:

Alanne, E. (1972). Zur Rolle der syntaktischen Interferenz der verwandten und unverwandten Sprachen. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73: 568–574.Find this resource:

Alaska Native Language Center. <http://www.uaf.edu/anlc/languages/stats/index.xml>.

Alber, B. and Arndt-Lappe, S. (2012). Templatic and subtractive truncation. In J. Trommer (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289–325.Find this resource:

Alderete, J. D. (1999). Morphologically governed accent in optimality theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.Find this resource:

Alderete, J. D. (2001). Dominance effects as transderivational Anti-faithfulness. Phonology 18: 201–253.Find this resource:

Alderete, J. D., Beckman, J., Benua, L., Gnanadesikan, A., McCarthy, J., and Urbancyzk, S. (1999). Reduplication with fixed segmentism. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 327–365.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, A. (2001). Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization, and Ergativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, A. (2009). On the role of syntactic locality in morphological processes: the case of (Greek) derived nominals. In A. Giannakidou and M. Rathert (eds), Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 253–280.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, A. (2010a). Nominalizations: a probe into the architecture of grammar. Part I: the nominalization puzzle. Language and Linguistics Compass 4: 496–511.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, A. (2010b). Nominalizations: a probe into the architecture of grammar. Part II: the aspectual properties of nominalizations, and the lexicon vs. syntax debate. Language and Linguistics Compass 4: 512–523.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, A. and Martin, F. (2012). Competing affixes as aspectual morphemes: the case of deadjectival nominalizations. Online Proceedings of the 8th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, A. and Schäfer, F. (2006). Instrument subjects are Agents or Causers. Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 25: 40–48.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, A. and Schäfer, F. (2010). On the syntax of episodic vs. dispositional -er nominals. In A. Alexiadou and M. Rathert (eds), The syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 9–38.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., and Schäfer, F. (2006). The properties of anti-causatives crosslinguistically. In M. Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of Interpretation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 187–211.Find this resource:

Alhoniemi, A. (1993), Grammatik des Tscheremissischen (Mari). Hamburg: Buske.Find this resource:

Alio, K., and Jungraithmayr, H. (1989). Lexique Bidiya. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Find this resource:

Allen, M. (1978). Morphological investigations. PhD dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs.Find this resource:

Alpher, B. (1973). Son of ergative. PhD dissertation. Cornell University.Find this resource:

Alpher, B. (1991). Yir-Yoront Lexicon: Sketch and Dictionary of an Australian Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Alpher, B. (2004). Pama-Nyungan: phonological reconstruction and status as a phylogenetic group. In C. Bowern and H. Koch (eds), Australian Languages: Classification and the Comparative Method (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 249). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 93–126.Find this resource:

Alsina, A. (1992). On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517–555Find this resource:

Alsina, A. (1999). Where’s the Mirror Principle? The Linguistic Review 16: 1–42.Find this resource:

Alves, M. J. (2001a). Distributional properties of causative verbs in Mon-Khmer languages. Mon-Khmer Studies 31: 107–120. (p. 789) Find this resource:

Alves, M. J. (2001b). What’s so Chinese about Vietnamese? In G. Thurgood (ed.), Papers from the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 221–241.Find this resource:

Alves, M. J. (2004). A Pacoh Grammar. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Amador Rodríguez, L. A. (2009). La derivación nominal en español. Nombres de agente, instrumento, lugar y acción. Bern: Lang.Find this resource:

Amberber, M., Baker, B., and Harvey, M. (eds) (2010). Complex Predicates: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Ambrazas, S. (1993). On the development of diminutives in the Baltic languages. Linguistica Baltica 2: 47–67.Find this resource:

Ameka, F. (1999). The typology and semantics of complex nominal duplication in Ewe. Anthropological Linguistics 41: 75–106.Find this resource:

Amery, R. (1993). Encoding new concepts in old languages: a case study of Kaurna, the language of the Adelaide Plains. Australian Aboriginal Studies 1: 33–47.Find this resource:

Anbessa T. (2000). A grammar of Sidaama. Ph.D. dissertation. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Find this resource:

Anceaux, L C. (1965). The Nimboran Language: Phonology and Morphology. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk lnstituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 44. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinns-Nijhoff.Find this resource:

Andersen, P. K. (1987). Zero-anaphora and related phenomena in Classical Tibetan. Studies in Language 11: 279–312.Find this resource:

Andersen, T. (1988). Consonant alternation in the verbal morphology of Päri. Afrika und Übersee 71: 63–113.Find this resource:

Andersen, T. (1990). Vowel length in Western Nilotic languages. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 22: 5–26.Find this resource:

Andersen, T. (1992–4). Morphological stratification in Dinka: on the alternations of vowel quality, vowel length and tone in the morphology of transitive verb roots in a monosyllabic language. Studies in African Linguistics 23(1): 1–63.Find this resource:

Anderson, G. D. S. (2004). Advances in Proto-Munda reconstruction. Mon-Khmer Studies 34: 159–184.Find this resource:

Anderson, G. D.S. (2007). The Munda Verb: Typological Perspectives. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Anderson, S. R. (1982). Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.Find this resource:

Anderson, S. R. (1985). Typological distinctions in word formation. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description Vol III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. New York: Cambridge University Press, 4–56.Find this resource:

Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Andersson, E. (1994). Swedish. In E. König and J. van der Auwera (eds), The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge, 271–312.Find this resource:

Andrews, S. and Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language 68: 279–296.Find this resource:

Ansaldo, U., Don, J., and Pfau, R. (2010). Parts of speech: particulars, universals and theoretical constructs. In U. Ansaldo, J. Don, and R. Pfau (eds), Parts of Speech: Empirical and Theoretical Advances. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–4.Find this resource:

Anshen, F., and M. Aronoff. (1999). Using dictionaries to study the mental lexicon. Brain and Language 68: 16–26. (p. 790) Find this resource:

Anward, J. (2001). Parts of speech. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, and W. Raible (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals. Volume I. Berlin: de Gruyter, 726–735.Find this resource:

Appah, C. K. I. and Appiah Amfo, N. A. (2011). The morphopragmatics of the diminutive morpheme (-ba /-wa ) in Akan. Lexis 6: Diminutives and Augmentatives in the Languages of the World 6: 59–84. Retrieved from <http://lexis.univ-lyon3.fr/IMG/pdf/Lexis_6.pdf>.Find this resource:

Applegate, R. (1972). Ineseño Chumash grammar. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California.Find this resource:

Applegate, R. (1976). Reduplication in Ineseño Chumash. In M. Langdon and S. Silver (eds), Hokan Studies. The Hague: Mouton, 271–283.Find this resource:

Appleyard, D. (2001). The verb ‘to say’ as a verb ‘recycling device’ in Ethiopian languages. In A. Zaborski (ed.), New Data and New Methods in Afroasiatic Linguistics: Robert Hetrzon, in Memoriam. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1–11.Find this resource:

Apresjan, J. D. (1974). Regular polysemy. Linguistics 142: 5–32.Find this resource:

Arad, M. (2003). Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 737–778.Find this resource:

Arad, M. (2005). Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Archangeli, D. (1983). The root CV-template as a property of the affix: evidence from Yawelmani. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 348–384.Find this resource:

Archangeli, D. (1985). Yokuts harmony: evidence for coplanar representation in nonlinear phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 335–272.Find this resource:

Archangeli, D. (1991). Syllabification and prosodic templates in Yawelmani. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 231–283.Find this resource:

Arenas, P. (2003). Etnografía y Alimentación entre los Toba-Ñachilamole’ek y Wichí-Lhuku’tas del Chaco Central (Argentina). Self-published. Buenos Aires.Find this resource:

Arenas, P. and Scarpa, G. (2007). Edible wild plants of the Chorote Indians, Gran Chaco, Argentina. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 153: 73–85.Find this resource:

Arnon, I. and Snider, N. (2010). More than words: frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62(1): 67–82.Find this resource:

Arnott, D. W. (1970). The Nominal and Verbal system of Fula. Oxford: Clarendon.Find this resource:

Arntz, R., Picht, H. and Mayer, F. (2009). Einführung in die Terminologiearbeit. 6th edn. Hildesheim: Olms.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. (1980). Contextuals. Language 56(4): 744–758.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. (1983). Potential words, actual words, productivity and frequency. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguists 163–171.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. (1988). Head operations and strata in reduplication: a linear treatment. Yearbook of Morphology 1: 1–15.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. and Anshen, F. (1998). Morphology and the lexicon: lexicalization and productivity. In A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 237–248.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M., and S. Cho. (2001). The semantics of -ship suffixation. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 167–173.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. and Fudeman, K. (2005). What Is Morphology? Malden, MA: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. and Fudeman, K. (2011). What Is Morphology? 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. and Fuhrhop, N. (2002). Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451–490. (p. 791) Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. and Schvaneveldt, R. (1978). Testing morphological productivity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 318: 106–114.Find this resource:

Artiagoitia, X., Ortiz de Urbina, J., and Hualde, J. I. (forthcoming). Basque. In P. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen and F. Rainer (eds), Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Asher, N. (1993). Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Asher, R. E. and Kumari, T. C. (1997). Malayalam. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Audring, J. and F. Masini (forthcoming). The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Augst, G., Bauer, A., and Stein, A. (1977). Grundwortschatz und Ideolekt. Empirische Untersuchung zur semantischen und lexicalischen Struktur des kindlichen Wortschatzes. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Austin, P. K. (1981). A Grammar of Diyari, South Australia (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Avrorin, V. (1959–61). Grammatika nanajskogo jazyka [A grammar of Nanaj]. Vols. 1–2. Moscow: Akademija Nauk.Find this resource:

Avrorin, V. (1981). Sintaksicheskie issledovanija po nanajskomu jazyku [Studies on Nanai syntax]. Leningrad: Nauka.Find this resource:

Avrorin, V. (2000). Grammatika manchshurskogo pis’mennogo jazyka [A grammar of Written Manchu]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.Find this resource:

Axelrod, M. (1993). The Semantics of Time: Aspectual Categorization in Koyukon Athabaskan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Find this resource:

Axelrod, M. (1998). Lexis, grammar, and grammatical change: the Koyukon classifier prefixes. In M. Darnell (ed.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 39–58.Find this resource:

Azeb Amha (2012). Omotic languages. In Z. Frajzyngier and E. Shay (eds), The Afroasiatic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 423–504.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (1989). A corpus-based approach to morphological productivity. Ph.D. dissertation. Free University of Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (1992). Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109–149.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (1993), On frequency, transparency, and productivity. In G. Booij, J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1992. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 181–208.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (1994a), Derivational productivity and text typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1: 16–34.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (1994b), Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 447–469.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (2003). Probabilistic approaches to morphology. In R. Bod, J. B. Hay, and S. Jannedy (eds), Probability Theory in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 229–287.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (2010a). Assessing the processing consequences of segment reduction in Dutch with naive discriminative learning. Lingue e linguaggio 9: 95–112.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (2010b). The directed compound graph of English: an exploration of lexical connectivity and its processing consequences. In S. Olsen (ed.), New Impulses in Word-formation (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17). Hamburg: Buske, 383–402. (p. 792) Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (2010c). A real experiment is a factorial experiment? The Mental Lexicon 5(1): 149–157.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. (2012). Learning from the Bible: computational modelling of the costs of letter transpositions and letter exchanges in reading Classical Hebrew and Modern English. Lingue e linguaggio 11(2): 123–146.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. and Lieber, R. (1991). Productivity and English derivation: a corpus based study. Linguistics 29: 801–843.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. and Plag, I. (2007). Parsing is not weaknessless: suffix ordering revisited. Unpublished manuscript. Edmonton, Canada, and Siegen, Germany.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. and Plag, I. (2009). Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85(1): 109–152.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H. and Schreuder, R. (2000). Towards a psycholinguistic computational model for morphological parsing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences) 358: 1–13.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., and Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., and Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language 53: 496–512.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Lieber, R., and Schreuder, R. (1997b). The morphological complexity of simplex nouns. Linguistics 35: 861–877.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H., and Krott, A. (2002). Dutch inflection: the rules that prove the exception. In S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, and F. Wijnen (eds), Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 61–92.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., McQueen, J., Dijkstra, T., and Schreuder, R. (2003). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: revisiting Dutch plurals. In R. H. Baayen, and R. Schreuder (eds), Morphological Structure in Language Processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 355–390.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H., and Aycock, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: a regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon 2: 419–463.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Levelt, W., Schreuder, R., and Ernestus, M. (2008). Paradigmatic structure in speech production. Proceedings Chicago Linguistics Society 43(1): 1–29.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Kuperman, V., and Bertram, R. (2010). Frequency effects in compound processing. In S. Scalise and I. Vogel (eds), Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipovic Durdjevic, D., Hendrix, P., and Marelli, M. (2011). An amor-phous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review 118(3): 438–481.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Hendrix, P., and Ramscar, M. (2012). Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: towards a processing model based on discriminative learning. Language and Speech 56: 329–347.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. H., Kuperman, V., Shaoul, C., and Milin, P., Kliegl, R., and Ramscar, M. (2013). Decomposition makes things worse: a discrimination learning approach to the time course of understanding compounds in reading. Manuscript, University of Tübingen and McMaster University.Find this resource:

Badecker, W. and Caramazza, A. (1989). A lexical distinction between inflection and derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 108–116.Find this resource:

Baerman, M. (in press). The Oxford Handbook of Inflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baeskow, H. (2010). His Lordship’s -ship and the King of Golfdom: against a purely functional analysis of suffixhood. Word Structure 3(1): 1–30. (p. 793) Find this resource:

Bakema, P. and Geeraerts, D. (2000). Diminution and augmentation. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds), Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Inflection and Word formation. Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1045–1052.Find this resource:

Baker, M. C. (1985a). Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Ph.D. dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Baker, M. C. (1985b). The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415.Find this resource:

Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Baker, M. C. (1996). The Polysynthesis Parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, M. C. (2003). Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, M. C. and N. Vinokurova. (2009). On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations. Language 85: 517–556.Find this resource:

Baker, M. C., Johnson, K., and Roberts, I. (1989). Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–251.Find this resource:

Bakker, D. (2011). Language sampling. In J.-J. Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 100–127.Find this resource:

Bakker, P. (2000). Convergence intertwining: an alternative way towards the genesis of mixed languages. In D. G. Gilbers, J. Nerbonne, and J. Schaeken (eds), Languages in Contact (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics, 28). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 29–35.Find this resource:

Balakaev, M. (ed.) (1962). Sovremennyj kazaxskij jazyk. Phonetika i morphologija. [Modern Kazakh. Phonetics and morphology.] Alma Ata: Akademija Nauk.Find this resource:

Balling, L. and Baayen, R. H. (2008). Morphological effects in auditory word recognition: evidence from Danish. Language and Cognitive Processes 23: 1159–1190.Find this resource:

Balling, L. and Baayen, R. H. (2012). Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morpho-logically complex words. Cognition 125: 80–106.Find this resource:

Balota, D., Cortese, M., and Pilotti, M. (1999). Visual lexical decision latencies for 2906 words. Available at: <http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~dbalota/lexicaldecision.html>.

Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., and Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates of 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory and Cognition 29: 639–647.Find this resource:

Balota, D., Cortese, M., Sergent-Marshall, S., Spieler, D., and Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition for single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133: 283–316.Find this resource:

Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. I., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., and Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods 39(3): 445–459.Find this resource:

Bamgboṣe, A. (1966). A Grammar of Yoruba. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Banker, E. M. (1964a). Bahnar affixation. Mon-Khmer Studies 1: 99–117.Find this resource:

Banker, E. M. (1964b). Bahnar reduplication. Mon-Khmer Studies 1: 119–134.Find this resource:

Banksira, D. P. (2000). Sound Mutations: The Morphophonology of Chaha. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bannard, C. and Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning: the effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19: 241–248.Find this resource:

Bareiro, V. (2006). La etnia manjui lumnanas del Chaco. Biblioteca Paraguaya de Antropología, vol. 56. Asunción: CEADUC. (p. 794) Find this resource:

Barker, C. (1998). Episodic -ee in English: a thematic role constraint on new word formation. Language 74: 695–727.Find this resource:

Barreteau, D. (1988). Description du Mofu-Gudur, vols. 1 and 2. Paris: ORSTOM.Find this resource:

Bartens, R. (2000). Permiläisten kielten rakenne ja kehitys. [Structure and development of the Permic languages.] Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 238. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Find this resource:

Baskakov, N. A. (1962). Vvedenie v izuchenie tjurkskix jazykov. [Introduction to the study of the Turkic languages.] Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

Bassène, A.-C. (2007). Morphosyntaxe du Jóola Banjal. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Bat-El, O. (1994). Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 571–596.Find this resource:

Bat-El, O. (2011). Semitic templates. In M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume, and K. Rice (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2586–2608.Find this resource:

Bates, E. and Rankin, J. (1979). Morphological development in Italian: connotation and denotation. Journal of Child Language 6: 29–52.Find this resource:

Bauer, A. H. (2007). Old English -fæst: a case of grammaticalisation. Folia Linguistica Historica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 28(1–2): 27–53.Find this resource:

Bauer, C. (1982). Morphology and syntax of spoken Mon. Ph.D. dissertation. University of London. School of Oriental and African Studies, Department of the Languages and Cultures of Southeast Asia and the Islands.Find this resource:

Bauer, C. (1989). The verb in spoken Mon. Mon-Khmer Studies 15: 87–110.Find this resource:

Bauer, C. (1990). Reanalyzing reanalyses in Katuic and Bahnaric. Mon-Khmer Studies 16–17: 143–182.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (1983). English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (1988a). A descriptive gap in morphology. Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 17–27.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (1988b). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (1996). No phonetic iconicity in evaluative morphology. Studia Linguisticai 50: 189–206.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (1997a). Evaluative morphology: in search of universals. Studies in Language 21(3): 533–575.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (1997b). Derivational Paradigms. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1996. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 243–256.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (1998). Is there a class of neoclassical compounds, and if so is it productive? Linguistics 36(3): 403–422.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press and Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (2004a). A Glossary of Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (2004b). The function of word-formation and the inflection–derivation distinction. In H. Aertsen, M. Hannay, and R. Lyall (eds), Words in their Places: A Festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, 283–292.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (2005a). The borderline between derivation and compounding. In W. U. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. E. Pfeiffer, and F. Rainer (eds), Morphology and its Demarcations. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 97–108.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (2005b). Conversion and the notion of lexical category. In L. Bauer and S. Valera (eds), Approaches to Conversion/Zero-derivation. Münster: Waxmann, 19–30.Find this resource:

Bauer, L. (2010). An overview of morphological universals. Word Structure 3(2): 131–140. (p. 795) Find this resource:

Bauer, L. and Huddleston, R. (2002). Lexical word-formation. In R. Huddleston and G. Pullum (eds), The Cambridge Grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1621–1721.Find this resource:

Bauer, L., Lieber, R. and Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baxter, W. and L. Sagart (2012). Reconstrucing the *s- prefix in Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics 13: 29–59.Find this resource:

Beard, R. (1977). On the extent and nature of irregularity in the lexicon. Lingua 42: 305–341.Find this resource:

Beard, R. (1981a). On the question of lexical regularity. Journal of Linguistics 17: 31–37.Find this resource:

Beard, R. (1981b). The Indo-European Lexicon. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

Beard, R. (1990). The nature and origins of derivational polysemy. Lingua 81: 101–140Find this resource:

Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Find this resource:

Beard, R. (1998). Derivation. In A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 44–65.Find this resource:

Beavers, J. and Francez, I. (2012). Several problems for predicate decompositions. In Z. Anti, C. B. Chang, E. Cibelli, J. Hong, M. J. Houser, C. S. Sandy, M. Toosarvandani, and Y. Yao (eds), Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistics Society 32. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, 37–48.Find this resource:

Beavers, J. and Koontz-Garboden, A. (in press). In defense of the reflexivization analysis of anticausativization. Lingua.Find this resource:

Beck, D. (2002). The typology of parts of speech systems: the markedness of adjectives. In Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Becker, J. A. (1994). ‘Sneak-shoes’, ‘sworders’ and ‘nose-beards’: a case study of lexical innovation. First Language 14: 195–211.Find this resource:

Becker, T. (1994). Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1993. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–26.Find this resource:

Beckwith, C. (1993). The Tibetan Empire in Central Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Beckwith, C. and Walter, M. (2010). On the meaning of Old Tibetan rje-blon during the Tibetan Empire Period. Journal Asiatique 298(2): 535–548.Find this resource:

Belletti, A. (2003). Agreement projections. In M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds), Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 483–510.Find this resource:

Bender, M. L. (1996). The Nilo-Saharan Languages: A Comparative Essay. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

Bendor-Samuel, J. (1960). Some problems of segmentation in the phonological analysis of Terena. Word 16: 348–155.Find this resource:

Benedict, P.K. (1972). Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Benjamin, G. (1976). An outline of Temiar grammar. In P. N. Jenner, L. C. Thompson, and S. Starosta (eds), Austroasiatic Studies Part II, 129–188 (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication No. 13). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Find this resource:

Benjamin, G. (2011). Temiar morphology (and Related Features): a view from the field. Fifth International Conference Austroasiatic Linguistics 5. Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand.Find this resource:

Bentin, S. and Frost, R. (2001). Linguistic theory and psychological reality: a reply to Boudelaa and Marslen-Wilson. Cognition 81(1): 113–118.Find this resource:

Benveniste, É. (1948). Noms d’agent et noms d’action en indo-européen. Paris: Adrien- Maisonneuve.Find this resource:

Benzing, J. (1955). Lamutische Grammatik. Mit Bibliographie, Sprachproben und Glossar. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GmbH. (p. 796) Find this resource:

Berg, R. van den. (1996). The demise of focus and the spread of conjugated verbs in Sulawesi. In H. Steinhauer (ed.), Papers in Austronesian Linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (PL A-84) 3: 89–114.Find this resource:

Bergen, B. K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80: 290–311.Find this resource:

Bergenholtz, H. and Mugdan, J. (1979). Ist Liebe primär? Über Ableitung und Wortarten. In Peter Braun (ed.), Deutsche Gegenwartssprache. München: Fink, 339–354.Find this resource:

Bergsland, K. (1994). Aleut Dictionary. Unungam Tunudgusii. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Find this resource:

Bergsland, K. (1997). Aleut Grammar. Unangam Tunuganaan Achixaasi. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center Research Paper Number 10, University of Alaska.Find this resource:

Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14: 150–177.Find this resource:

Berman, R. A. (1982). Verb-pattern alternation: the interface of morphology, syntax, and semantics in Hebrew child language. Journal of Child Language 9: 169–191.Find this resource:

Berman, R. A. (1985). Acquisition of Hebrew. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 255–371.Find this resource:

Berman, R. A. (1987). Productivity in the lexicon: new word formation in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguisticica XXI: 425–461.Find this resource:

Berman, R. A. (2009). Children’s acquisition of compound constructions. In R. Lieber and P. Stekauer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 298–322.Find this resource:

Berman, Ruth A., and Sagi, Y. (1981). al darxey tecurat hamilim vexidushvan bagil haca’ir [Word-formation processes and lexical innovations of young children]. Hebrew Computational Linguistics Bulletin 18: 36–62.Find this resource:

Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2012). The architecture of grammar and the division of labor in exponence. In J. Trommer (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 8–83.Find this resource:

Bermúdez-Otero, R. (forthcoming). Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., and Schreuder, R. (2000a). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language 42: 390–405.Find this resource:

Bertram, R., Laine, M., and Virkkala, M. M. (2000c). The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: get by with a little help from my morpheme friends. Scandinavian Journal of Morphology 41: 287–296.Find this resource:

Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2000b). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: the role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26: 419–511.Find this resource:

Bessé, B. de (1997), Terminological Definitions [transl. J. C. Sager]. In S. E. Wright and G. Budin (eds), Handbook of Terminology Management Volume 1: Basic Aspects of Terminology Management. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 63–74.Find this resource:

Beyer, S. (1992). The Classical Tibetan language. New York: State University of New York Press.Find this resource:

Bhat, D. N. (1994). The Adjectival Category: Criteria for Differentiation and Identification. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bick, A., Goelman, G., and Frost, R. (2008). Neural correlates of morphological processes in Hebrew. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(3): 406–420.Find this resource:

Bickel, B. and Nichols, J. (2007). Inflectional morphology. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169–228.Find this resource:

Biddle, N. (2012). Indigenous Language Usage. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University.Find this resource:

Bielec, D. (1998). Polish: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge. (p. 797) Find this resource:

Bien, H., Levelt, W., and Baayen, R. H. (2005). Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102: 17876–17881.Find this resource:

Bien, H., Baayen, R. H., and Levelt, W. (2011). Frequency effects in the production of Dutch deverbal adjectives and inflected verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes 27: 683–715.Find this resource:

Biese, Y. M. (1941). Origin and development of conversions in English. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae B XLV(2).Find this resource:

Bird, H., Lambon R., Seidenberg, M., McClelland, J., and Patterson, K. (2003). Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: what’s the connection? Journal of Memory and Language 48: 502–526.Find this resource:

Bisang, W. (1996). Areal typology and grammaticalization: processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language 20(3): 519–597.Find this resource:

Bisetto, A. and C. Melloni. (2007). Result nominals: a lexical semantic investigation. In online Procedings of 5th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting.Find this resource:

Bittner, M. (1987). On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53: 194–231.Find this resource:

Bittner, M. (2005). Future discourse in a tenseless language. Journal of Semantics 22(4): 339–387.Find this resource:

Blackings, M., and N. Fabb. (2003). A Grammar of Ma’di. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Blake, B. J. (1987). Australian Aboriginal Grammar. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Blake, B. J. (1991). Australian Aboriginal Languages: A General Introduction. 2nd edn. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Find this resource:

Blake, B. J. and K. Burridge (eds) (2003). Historial Linguistics 2001: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001 (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, 237). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Blake, F. R. (1925). A Grammar of the Tagálog Language. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Find this resource:

Blažek, V. (2006). Current progress in Altaic etymology. Linguistica Online January 30.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. (1996). Mokilese reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 523–530.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. (1999). Untangling Leti infixation. Oceanic Linguistics 38(2): 383–403.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. (2005). Yurok verb classes. International Journal of American Linguistics 71: 327–349.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. (2012). Duality of patterning: absolute universal or statistical tendency? Language and Cognition 4(4): 275–296.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. (forthcoming a). Periphrastic agreement in Yurok. In J. P. Blevins, F. Ackerman, and G. T. Stump (eds), Paradigms and Periphrasis. Stanford: CSLI.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. (forthcoming b). Linguistic clues to Andamanese pre-history: understanding the North-South divide. In T. Güldemann, P. McConvell, and R. Rhodes (eds), Hunter-gatherers and Linguistic History: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. and Garrett, A. (1998). The origins of consonant-vowel metathesis. Language 74: 508–556.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. P. (2001). Paradigmatic derivation. Transactions of the Philological Society 99: 211–222.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. P. (2003). Stems and paradigms. Language 79: 737–767.Find this resource:

Bloch, B. and Trager, G. L. (1942). Outline of Linguistic Analysis. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Find this resource:

Bloch-Trojnar, M. (2006). Polyfunctionality in Morphology: A Study of Verbal Nouns in Modern Irish. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Find this resource:

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt. [(1984). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.] (p. 798) Find this resource:

Blust, R. (1979). Proto-Western Malayo-Polynesian vocatives. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde 135: 205–251.Find this resource:

Blust, R. (1993). Kelabit-English vocabulary. The Sarawak Museum Journal 44.65 (NS): 141–226.Find this resource:

Blust, R. (1998). Ca- reduplication and Proto-Austronesian grammar. Oceanic Linguistics 37: 29–64.Find this resource:

Blust, R. (2003). Thao Dictionary (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series A5). Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office). Academia Sinica. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Find this resource:

Blust, R. (2009). The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (PL 602).Find this resource:

Blust, R. and S. Trussel. (2010). Austronesian Comparative Dictionary. web edition <www.trussel2.com/ACD revision 8/14/2012>.

Bobaljik, J. D. (2012). Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives and the Structure of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Bochner, H. (1984). Inflection within derivation. The Linguistic Review 3(4): 411–442.Find this resource:

Bodrogligeti, A. J. E. (2001). A Grammar of Chagatay. München: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Bogoras, W. (1969). Chukchee. In F. Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages (Bureau of Ethnology Bulletin 40, part 2). Charleston, SC: Nabu Press, 631–903.Find this resource:

Bogoyavlenskiy, D. N. (1973). The acquisition of Russian inflections. In C. A. Ferguson and D. I. Slobin (eds), Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 284–292.Find this resource:

Böhmerová, A. (2011). Suffixal diminutives and augmentatives in Slovak—a systemic view with some cross-linguistic considerations. Lexis 6: Diminutives and Augmentatives in the Languages of the World 6: 59–84. [Retrieved from <http://lexis.univ-lyon3.fr/IMG/pdf/Lexis_6_-_Bohmerova.pdf>.]Find this resource:

Boldyrev, B. (1976). Kategorija kosvennoj prinadleZnosti v tungusoman’chzhurskix jazykax [The category of alienable possession in Manchu-Tungus]. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

Boldyrev, B. (1987). Slovoobrazovanie imen sushchestvitel’nyx v tungusoman’chzhurskix jazykax v sravnitel’no-istoricheskom osveshchenii [Nominal word formation in Tungus-Manchu. A comparative aspect]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Find this resource:

Bolozky, S. (1994). On the formation of diminutives in Modern Hebrew morphology. Hebrew Studies 35: 47–63.Find this resource:

Bolozky, S. (1999). Measuring Productivity in Word Formation: The Case of Israeli Hebrew. Leiden: Brill.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (1986). Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch agent nouns. Linguistics 24: 503–517.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (1988). The relation between inheritance and argument linking: deverbal nouns in Dutch. In M. Everaert and A. Evers (eds), Morphology and Modularity: In Honour of Henk Schultink. Dordrecht: Foris, 57–73.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (1996). Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In G. Booij and I. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–16.Find this resource:

Booij, G. E. (1997). Autonomous morphology and paradigmatic relations. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996. Dordrecht: Springer, 35–53.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (2000). Inflection and derivation. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann and J. Mugdan (eds), Morphologie/Morphology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 360–369.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (2001). Lexical phonology: a review. In C. Kreidler (ed.), Phonology: Critical Concepts. London: Routledge, 460–490.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (2002). The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (2006). Inflection and derivation. In K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, 654–661. (p. 799) Find this resource:

Booij, G. (2007). The Grammar of Words. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Booij, G. E. (2008). Paradigmatic morphology. In B. Fradin (ed.), La raison morphologique. Hommage á la mémoire de Danielle Corbin. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 29–38.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (2009). Compounding and construction morphology. In R. Lieber and P. Štekauer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–216.Find this resource:

Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Booij, G. and Lieber, R. (1993). On the simultaneity of morphological and prosodic structure. In S. Hargus and E. Kaisse (eds), Phonology: Studies in Lexical Phonology 4: 23–44.Find this resource:

Booij, G. and Lieber, R. (2004). On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42: 327–357.Find this resource:

Booij, G., Lehmann, C. and Mugdan, J. (eds), Morphologie/Morphology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bopp, F. (1833). Vergleichende Grammatik des Sanskrit, Zend, Griechischen, Lateinischen, Litthauischen, Gothischen und Deutschen. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler.Find this resource:

Borer, H. (2005a). In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Borer, H. (2005b). The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Borer, H. (2013). Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boretzky, N., W. Enninger, and T. Stolz (eds) (1989). Beiträge zum 5. Essener Kolloquium überGrammatikalisierung: Natürlichkeit und Systemökonomie’. Vol. 1. (Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 7). Bochum: Brockmeyer.Find this resource:

Bornemann, E. and Risch, E. (1978). Griechische Grammatik. 2nd edn. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg.Find this resource:

Borowiak, T. (2007). Mixed conjunct verbs and other manifestations of Hindi Englishization. Investigationes Linguisticae 15: 1–13. [<http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~inveling/pdf/Borowiak_INVELING15.pdf> retrieved June 26, 2012.]Find this resource:

Borsley, R. and Kornfilt, J. (2000). Mixed extended projections. In R. Borsley (ed.), The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories. New York: Academic Press, 101–131.Find this resource:

Botha, R. (1981). A base rule theory of Afrikaans synthetic compounding. In M. Moortgat, H. van der Hulst, and T. Hoekstra (eds), The Scope of Lexical Rules. Dordrecht: Foris, 1–77.Find this resource:

Boudelaa, S. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition 81(1): 65–92.Find this resource:

Boudelaa, S. and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: the cv-skeleton in Arabic. Cognition 92(3): 271–303.Find this resource:

Boudelaa, S., Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Shtyrov, Y., and Marslen-Wilson, W. (2009). Arabic morphology in the neural language system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(5): 998–1010.Find this resource:

Bourchier, L. (2008). Redupli-ca-cation. Poster presented at the 13th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna.Find this resource:

Bowern, C. and Koch, H. (eds) (2004). Australian Languages: Classification and the Comparative Method (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 249). Philadelphia: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Boyd, J. (2007). Comparatively speaking: a psycholinguistic study of optionality in grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.Find this resource:

Bozic, M., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Stamatakis, E. A., Davis, M. H., and Tyler, L. K. (2007). Differentiating morphology, form, and meaning: neural correlates of morphological complexity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19(9): 1464–1475.Find this resource:

Bram, B. (2011). Major total conversion in English: the question of directionality. Ph.D. dissertation. Victoria University of Wellington. (p. 800) Find this resource:

Braunstein, J. and Vidal, A. (forthcoming). The Gran Chaco: convergence of languages and peoples. In R. Rhodes, T. Güldemann, and P. McConvell (eds), The Languages of Hunter-gatherers. Historical and Global Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bréal, M. (1868). Les idées latentes du langage. Paris: Hachette.Find this resource:

Bréal, M. (1887). L’histoire des mots, Revue des Deux Mondes, LVIIe année—troisième période, tome quatre-vingt-deuxième, 187–212.Find this resource:

Bredin, H. (1984). Sign and value in Saussure. Philosophy 59: 67–77.Find this resource:

Brekle, H. H. (1978). Reflections on the conditions for coining, use, and understanding of nominal compounds. In W. U. Dressler and W. Meid (eds), Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Linguists, Vienna 1977. Innsbruck: Inbrucker Beitraege zur Sprachwissenschaft, 68–77.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J., (ed.) (1982). The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. (1996). Lexicality and argument structure. Invited paper given at the Paris Syntax and Semantics Conference. October 12–14. <http://www.stanford.edu/~bresnan/paris.pdf>.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. and Ford, M. (2010). Predicting syntax: processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1): 168–213.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. and Mchombo, S. A. (1995). The lexical integrity principle: evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 181–252.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. and Moshi, L. (1990). Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147–185.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., and Baayen, R. H. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bouma, I. Kramer, and J. Zwarts (eds), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, 69–94.Find this resource:

Breu, W. (1996). Überlegungen zu einer Klassifizierung des grammatischen Wandels im Sprachkontakt (am Beispiel slavischer Kontaktfälle). Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49(1): 21–38.Find this resource:

Briggs, J., Johns, A., and Cook, C. (in progress). Utkuhiksalingmiut Postbase Dictionary. <http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~inuit/UIDP/index.h>.

Brömser, B. (1985). On the derivation of English verbal compounds. In W. Kürschner and R. Vogt (eds), Grammatik, Semantik, Textlinguistik, Band 1. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 99–113.Find this resource:

Broschart, J. (1997). Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology 1: 123–165.Find this resource:

Brown, D. (2011). Morphological Typology. In J.-J. Song, (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 487–503.Find this resource:

Brown, D. and Hippisley, A. (2012). Network Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, L., and Dryer, M. S. (n.d.). Diminutive as an inflectional category in Walman. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. Retrieved from <http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/BrownDryerWalmanDimin.pdf>.Find this resource:

Brown, S. W. (2008). Polysemy in the mental lexicon. Colorado Research in Linguistics 21: 1–12.Find this resource:

Brysbaert, M. and New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4): 977–990.Find this resource:

Buba, B., and Owens, J. (2007). Glavda morphology. In A. S. Kaye (ed.), Morphologies of Asia and Africa, vol. 1. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 641–675. (p. 801) Find this resource:

Burani, C. and Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes 2: 217–227.Find this resource:

Burani, C., Dovetto, M., Thornton, A. M., and Laudanna, A. (1997). Accessing and naming suffixed pseudo-words. In G. E. Booij, and J. Van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1996. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 55–72.Find this resource:

Burenhult, N. (2002). A grammar of Jahai. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.Find this resource:

Burnley, D. (1992). Word formation. In N. F. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language 2. 1066—1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 439–51.Find this resource:

Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (ed.), Language production, vol. 2. London: Academic Press, 257–294.Find this resource:

Buzássyová, K. (1974). Sémantika slovenských deverbatív. Bratislava: Veda.Find this resource:

Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, J., Perkins, R., and Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Bye, P. and Svenonius, P. (2012). Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In J. Trommer (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 42–495.Find this resource:

Caballero, G. (2008). Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) phonology and morphology. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, CA.Find this resource:

Caballero, G. (2010). Scope, phonology and morphology in an agglutinating language: Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) variable suffix ordering. Morphology 20: 165–204.Find this resource:

Caballero, G. (2011). Morphologically conditioned stress assignment in Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara). Linguistics 49(4): 749–790.Find this resource:

Caballero, G. and Harris, A. C. (2012). A working typology of Multiple Exponence. In F. Kiefer et al. (eds), Current Issues in Morphological Theory: (Ir)Regularity, Analogy and Frequency. Selected papers from the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, May 13–16, 2010. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Campbell, L. (1987). Syntactic change in Pipil. International Journal of American Linguistics 53(3): 253–80.Find this resource:

Campbell, L. (1997). American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Campbell, L. and Langacker, R. (1978). Proto-Aztecan Vowels, parts. I–III. International Journal of American Linguistics 44: 85–102, 197–210, 262–79.Find this resource:

Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Caterina, M., and Laudanna, A. (1985). Reading mechanisms and the organization of the lexicon: evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2: 81–114.Find this resource:

Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., and Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 28: 297–332.Find this resource:

Carlson, R. (1994). A Grammar of Supyire. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Carochi, H. (1645). Grammar of the Mexican language with an explanation of its adverbs. [Translated and edited with commentary by James Lockhart, UCLA Latin American Center.]Find this resource:

Carol, J. (2009/10). Causación en chorote. Amerindia 33–34: 73–108.Find this resource:

Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of fmri experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience 6: 1–13.Find this resource:

Carrier, J. (1979). The interaction of phonological and morphological rules in Tagalog. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

Carstairs, A. (1987). Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm. (p. 802) Find this resource:

Carstairs, A. (1988). Some implications of phonologically conditioned suppletion. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 67–94.Find this resource:

Carstairs, A. (1990). Phonologically conditioned suppletion. In W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschützky, O. E. Pfeiffer, and J. R. Rennison (eds), Contemporary Morphology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 17–23.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1992). Current Morphology. New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1998). Phonological constraints on morphological rules. In A. Spencer and A. Zwicky (eds), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 144–148.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2005). Basic terminology. In P. Štekauer and R. Lieber (eds), Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 5–24.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2006). Internal modification. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 5. Oxford: Elsevier, 752–755.Find this resource:

Casali, R. F. (2008). ATR harmony in African languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(3): 496–549.Find this resource:

Casaus, M. (in preparation). Quantitative ethnobotany and acculturation among the Rarámuri of Choguita, Chihuahua, México. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Find this resource:

Castrén, M. A. (1858). Versuch einer jenissei-ostjakischen und kottischen Sprachlehre. St. Petersburg.Find this resource:

Cataldi, L. (n.d.). Ngardi Vocabulary and Notes. Canberra: AIATSIS.Find this resource:

Cense, A. A. (1979). Makassaars-Nederlands woordenboek. Koninklijk Instituut voor taal-, land- en volkenkunde. The Hague: Nijhoff.Find this resource:

Census of India (2010). <http://www.censusindia.gov.in/default.aspx>. Retrieved June 23, 2012.

Centineo, G. (1995). The distribution of si in Italian transitive/inchoative pairs. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 5: 54–71.Find this resource:

Cerin, M. (1994). The pronominal system of Yaralde. B.A. dissertation. University of Melbourne.Find this resource:

Chang, B. S. (1971). The Tibetan causative phonology. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 42: 623–765.Find this resource:

Chao, Y. R. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Chapman, D. and Skousen, R. (2005). Analogical modeling and morphological change: the case of the adjectival negative prefix in English. English Language and Linguistics 9(2): 333–357.Find this resource:

Chappell, H. (2001). Language contact and areal diffusion in Sinitic languages. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 328–357.Find this resource:

Charekov, S. L. (1990). Prilagatel’nye v mongol’skix jazykax v sravnenii s drugimi altajskimi [Adjectives in Mongolic in comparison with other Altaic languages]. Leningrad: Nauka.Find this resource:

Charles, T. (2012). Two deaf fishermen: a Klallam story told by Thomas Charles, with glossing and grammatical notes. Accessed August 1, 2012 at <www.ling.unt.edu/~montler/Klallam/Fishermen/>.

Charney, J. O. (1993). A Grammar of Comanche. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Find this resource:

Cheng, L. and Sybesma, R. (eds) (2003). The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book: The Latest in Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chierchia, G. (2004). A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, and M. Everaert (eds), The Unaccusativity Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 22–59.Find this resource:

Childs, G. T. (1994). African ideophones. In L. Hinton et al. (eds), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 247–279.Find this resource:

Childs, G. T. (2011). A Grammar of Mani. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (p. 803) Find this resource:

Chmura-Klekotowa, M. (1964). Rozwój rozumienia budowy wyrazów i unmiejetnosci tworzenia wyrazów nowych (analogicznych) u dzieci w wieku przedszkolnym [The development of understanding of the internal structure of words and the capacity to create new (analogic) words in preschool children]. Psychologia Wychowawcza 1: 403–418.Find this resource:

Chmura-Klekotowa, M. (1970). Odbicie tendencij slowotwórczych jezyka polskiego w neologizmach dzieci [Reflection of derivational trends of the Polish language in children’s neologisms]. Prace Filologiczne 20: 153–159.Find this resource:

Chmura-Klekotowa, M. (1971). Neologizmy slowotwórcze w mowie dzieci [Morphological neologisms in the speech of children]. Prace Filologiczne 21: 99–235.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalizations. In R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn, 184–221.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. (1995). Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. Otero, and M.-L. Zubizaretta (eds), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 133–166.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Find this resource:

Christianson, K., Johnson, R., and Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 31(6): 1327–1339.Find this resource:

Chung, K. S. (2006). Mandarin Compound Verbs. Taipei: Crane Publishing.Find this resource:

Chung, S. (2012). Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro. Theoretical Linguistics 1–56.Find this resource:

Chung, S. and Ladusaw, W. (2003). Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Churchward, C. M. (1940). Rotuman Grammar and Dictionary. Sydney: Australian Medical Publishing Co. [Repr. AMS Press, New York, 1978.]Find this resource:

CIA-The World Factbook (n.d.) <www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/kr.html#People>.

Cincius, V. (1947). Ocherk grammatiki évenskogo (lamutskogo) jazyka [A grammar of Even (Lamut)]. Leningrad: Učpedgiz.Find this resource:

Cincius, V. (1949). Sravnitelnaja fonetika tunguso-manchzhurskix jazykov [The comparative phonetics of the Tungus-Manchu languages]. Leningrad: Učpedgiz.Find this resource:

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ciszek, E. (2002). ME -lich(e)/-ly. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An International Review of English Studies 38: 105–129.Find this resource:

Ciszek, E. (2004). On some French elements in Early Middle English word derivation. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An International Review of English Studies 40: 111–119.Find this resource:

Ciszek, E. (2006). -Dōm in Medieval English. In N. Ritt et al. (eds), Medieval English and Its Heritage: Structure, Meaning and Mechanisms of Change (Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature: 16). Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 105–24.Find this resource:

Ciszek, E. (2008). Word Derivation in Early Middle English (Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature: 23). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Find this resource:

Ciszek, E. (2012). The Middle English suffix- ish: reasons for decline in productivity <http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+Middle+English+suffix+-ish%3A+reasons+for+decline+in+productivity.-a0304842811>, accessed February 14, 2013. (p. 804)

Clackson, J. (2007). Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. (1978). Awareness of language: Some evidence from what children say and do. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella, and W. J. M. Levelt (eds), The Child’s Conception of Language. Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 17–43.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. (1981). Negative verbs in children’s speech. In W. Klein and W. J. M. Levelt (eds), Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics: Studies Presented to Manfred Bierwisch. Dordrecht: Reidel, 253–264.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. (1982). The young word-maker: A case study of innovation in the child’s lexicon. In E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (eds), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 390–425.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. (1984). Acquiring compounds. In Proceedings of the First Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, 181–190.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. (1993). The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. (2001). Emergent categories in first language acquisition. In M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 379–405.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. (2009). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. and Berman, R. A. (1984). Structure and use in the acquisition of word formation. Language 60: 542–590.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. and Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. and Cohen, S. R. (1984). Productivity and memory for newly formed words. Journal of Child Language 11: 611–625.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. and Hecht, B. F. (1982). Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition 12: 1–24.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V., Carpenter, K. L., and Deutsch, W. (1995). Reference states and reversals: undoing actions with verbs. Journal of Child Language 22: 633–662.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V., Hecht, B. F., and Mulford, R. (1986). Coining complex compounds in English: affixes and word order in acquisition. Linguistics 24: 7–29.Find this resource:

Clark, M. (n.d.). Notes on the causative prefix in some Mon-Khmer languages. University of Hawaii. ms.Find this resource:

Clauson, G. (1959). The case for the Altaic theory examined. In H. Franke (ed.), Akten des vierundzwanzigsten internationalen Orientalisten-Kongresses. Wiesbaden: Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft, in Komission bei Franz Steiner Verlag.Find this resource:

Clauson, G. (1968). A lexicostatistical appraisal of the Altaic theory. Central Asiatic Journal 13: 1–23.Find this resource:

Coblin, W. S. (1976). Notes on Tibetan verb morphology. T’oung Pao Archives 62: 45–70.Find this resource:

Cohen, P. D. (1966). Presyllables and reduplication in Jeh. Mon-Khmer Studies 2: 31–53.Find this resource:

Cohn, A. (1989). Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 167–216.Find this resource:

Cole, P., Beauvillain, C., and Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: a differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 1–13.Find this resource:

Coleman, D. (2012). Mazin Grace. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Find this resource:

Collinder, B. (1960). Comparative Grammar of the Uralic languages. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Find this resource:

Comfort, J. and Jakobi, A. (2011). The verb ‘to give’ as a verbal extension in Uncunwee (Kordofan Nubian). In R. Kramer, H. Tröbs, and R. Kastenholz (eds), Afrikanische Sprachen im Fokus. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe, 27–35. (p. 805) Find this resource:

Compton, R. (2012). The syntax and semantcs of modification in Inuktitut: adjectives and adverbs in a polysynthetic language. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Toronto.Find this resource:

Compton, R. and Pittman, C. (2010). Word formation by phase in Inuit. Lingua 120: 2167–2192.Find this resource:

Comrie, B. (1981). The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Comrie, B. and Thompson, S. A. (2007). Lexical nominalization. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 334–381.Find this resource:

Comrie, B., Golluscio L., González, L., and Vidal, A. (2010). El Chaco como área lingüística. In Z. Estrada and R. Arzapalo (eds.), Estudios de lenguas amerindias 2. Lenguas indígenas. Hermosillo: University of Sonora, 85–131.Find this resource:

Conathan, L., and Good, J. (2000). Morphosyntactic reduplication in Chechen and Ingush. In A. Okrent and J. P. Boyle, (eds), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 36-2: The panels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 49–61.Find this resource:

Condoravdi, C. and Kiparsky, P. (1998). Optimal order and scope. Paper presented at The Lexicon in Focus, Heinrich-Heine Universität Düsseldorf, August.Find this resource:

Conrady, A. (1896). Eine indochinesische Causativ-Denominativ-Bildung und ihr Zusammenhang mit den Tonaccenten. Leipzig: O. Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

Cook, C. and Johns, A. (2009). Determining the semantics of Inuktitut postbases. In M. A. Mahieu and N. Tersis (eds), Variations on Polysynthesis: The Eskaleut Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 149–170.Find this resource:

Cooper, J. S. (1966). Halăng verb phrase. In D. D. Thomas (ed.), Papers on Four Vietnamese Languages. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand, 28–34.Find this resource:

Cooreman, A. (1994). A functional typology of antipassives. In B. A. Fox and P. J. Hopper (eds), Voice: Form and Function. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 49–88.Find this resource:

Corbett, G. (1987). The morphology–syntax interface: evidence from possessive adjectives in Slavonic. Language 63: 299–345.Find this resource:

Corbett, G. (1999). Prototypical inflection: implications for typology. Morphology 1–22.Find this resource:

Corbett, G. (2010). Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3: 141–155.Find this resource:

Corbett, G. G. (forthcoming). Canonical morphosyntactic features. In D. Brown, M. Chumakina, and G. G. Corbett (eds), Canonical Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Corbin, D. (1987). Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer (2 vols).Find this resource:

Corris, M. (2008). A grammar of Barupu: a language of Papua New Guinea. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney.Find this resource:

Corston-Oliver, S. (2002). Roviana. In J. Lynch, M. Ross, and T. Crowley (eds), The Oceanic Languages. Richmond: Curzon Press, 467–497.Find this resource:

Cortina Borja M. and Valiñas Coalla, L. (1989). Some remarks on Uto-Aztecan classification. International Journal of American Linguistics 55: 214–239.Find this resource:

Coseriu, E. (1952). Sistema, norma y habla. Montevideo: Universidad de la Republica, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias.Find this resource:

Costa, S.R. (1976). Aprendizagem de alguns aspectos da morfologia portuguesa por crianças brasileiras [The learning of some aspects of Portuguese morphology by Brazilian children]. M.A. thesis. Universidade de Campinas, Brazil.Find this resource:

Costello, N. A. (1966). Affixes in Katu. Mon-Khmer Studies 2: 63–86.Find this resource:

Costello, N. A. (1998). Affixes in Katu of the Lao P.D.R. Mon-Khmer Studies 28: 31–42.Find this resource:

Costello, N. A. (2001). Aspect and tense in Katu of the Lao P.D.R. Mon-Khmer Studies 31: 121–125.Find this resource:

Coupe, A. R. (2007). A Grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (p. 806) Find this resource:

Cowie, C. (2012). Morphology. In A. Bergs and L. Brinton (eds), English Historical Linguistics 1(5): 604–621. [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 34.1].Find this resource:

Craig, M. (1980). Aroma morphology. Kivung 12: 111–133.Find this resource:

Crass, J. (2005). Das K’abeena. Deskriptive Grammatik einer hochland-ostkuschitischen Sprache (Kuschitische Sprachstudien 23). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Crazzolara, J. P. (1938). A Study of the Acooli Language. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Find this resource:

Creider, C. A., and Creider, J. T. (2001). A Dictionary of the Nandi Language. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Crick, F. H. C. (1989). The recent excitement about neural networks. Nature 337: 129–132.Find this resource:

Croft, W. (1984). Semantic and pragmatic correlates to syntactic categories. In D. Testen, V. Mishra, and J. Drogo (eds), Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 53–70.Find this resource:

Croft, W. (1990). Possible verbs and the structure of events. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and Prototypes. London: Routledge, 48–73.Find this resource:

Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Croft, W. (2000). Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In P. M. Vogel and B. Comrie (eds), Approaches to the Typology of Word-classes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 65–102.Find this resource:

Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, W. and Poole, K. (2008). Inferring universals from grammatical variation: multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34: 1–37.Find this resource:

Crowhurst, M. (1994). Foot extrametricality and template mapping in Cupeño. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 177–201.Find this resource:

Crowley, T. (1978). The Middle Clarence Dialects of Bandjalang. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Find this resource:

Crowley, T. (1982). The Paamese Language of Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics (PL B-87).Find this resource:

Crowley, T. (1993). Pre-1860 European contact in the Pacific and introduced cultural vocabulary. Australian Journal of Linguistics 13(2): 119–163.Find this resource:

Crowley, T. (1998). An Erromangan (Sye) grammar (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 27). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Find this resource:

Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Crystal, D. (1967). Word classes in English. Lingua 17: 24–56.Find this resource:

Cusihuaman, A. (1976). Gramática Quechua: Cuzco-Collao. Lima, Perú: Ministerio de Educación, Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Find this resource:

Cusic, D. (1981). Verbal plurality and aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Find this resource:

Cutler, A. (1980). Productivity in word formation. Papers from the 16th regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago, 45–51.Find this resource:

Cutler, A., Hawkins, J. A. and Gilligan, G. (1985). The suffixing preference: a processing explanation. Linguistics 23: 723–758.Find this resource:

Czaykowska-Higgins, E. and Kinkade, M. D. (1998). Salish languages and linguistics. In E. Czaykowska-Higgins and M. D. Kinkade (eds), Salish Languages and Linguistics: Theoretical and Descriptive Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–69.Find this resource:

Dabrowska, E. (2006). Low level schemas or general rules? The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish case inflections. Language Sciences 28: 120–135. (p. 807) Find this resource:

Dahl, Ö. (ed.) (2000). Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, Eurotyp, 20–6). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 309–28.Find this resource:

Daltas, P. (1987). Some patterns of variability in the use of diminutive and augmentative suffixes in spoken Modern Greek Koine (MGK). Glossologia 4: 63–88.Find this resource:

Dalton-Puffer, C. (1994). Productive or not productive? The Romance element in Middle English derivation. In F. Fernández, M. Fuster, and J. J. Calvo (eds), English Historical Linguistics 1992 (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory: 113). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 247–60.Find this resource:

Dalton-Puffer, C. (1996a). Suffixal derivation in Middle English: a corpus-based study. Dissertation Abstracts International 57: 3.Find this resource:

Dalton-Puffer, C. (1996b). The French Influence on Middle English Morphology. A Corpus-based Study of Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Dalton-Puffer, C. and Plag, I. (2000). Categorywise, some compound-type morphemes seem to be rather suffix-like: on the status of -ful, -type and -wise in Present-Day English. Folia Linguistica 34(3-4): 225–244.Find this resource:

Dambacher, M. and Kliegl, R. (2007). Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and n400 amplitudes during sentence reading. Brain Research 1155: 147–162.Find this resource:

Danchev, A. (1989). Language change typology and adjectival comparison in contact situations. Folia Linguistica Historica 9(2): 161–174.Find this resource:

Danks, D. (2003). Equilibria of the Rescorla–Wagner model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 47(2): 109–121.Find this resource:

Darmesteter, A. (1887). La vie des mots étudiée dans leurs significations. Paris: Delagrave.Find this resource:

Dasgupta, P. (2003). Bangla. In G. Cardona and D. Jain (eds), The Indo-Aryan Languages. London: Routledge, 351–90.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. (1967). The Logical form of action sentences. In N. Resher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 81–95.Find this resource:

Davis, K. (2003). A Grammar of the Hoava Language, Western Solomons. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Find this resource:

Davis, S. and Ueda, I. (2002). Mora augmentation processes in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 18: 1–23.Find this resource:

Davis, S. and Ueda, I. (2006). Prosodic vs. morphological mora augmentation. Lexicon Forum 2: 121–143.Find this resource:

Davis, S. and Zawaydeh, B. A. (1999a). A descriptive analysis of hypocoristics in Colloquial Arabic. Language and Linguistics 3: 83–98.Find this resource:

Davis, S. and Zawaydeh, B. A. (1999b). Hypocoristic formation in Ammani-Jordanian Arabic. In E. Benmamoun (ed.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XII. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 113–139.Find this resource:

Davis, S. and Zawaydeh, B. A. (2001). Arabic hypocoristics and the status of the consonantal root. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 512–520.Find this resource:

Davliyeva, A. R. (2011). An investigation of Kazan Tatar morphology. M.A. thesis. University of San Diego. <http://sdsu-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.10/1063/Davliyeva_Albina.pdf?sequence=1>.Find this resource:

Dayley, J. P. (1985). Tzutujil Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Dayley, J. P. (1989). Tumpisa (Panamint) Shoshone Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

De Belder, M., Faust, N. and Lampitelli, N. (2010). On an inflectional and a derivational diminutive. Manuscript. Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7. (p. 808) Find this resource:

de Groot, C. (2000). Minor word classes. In G. E. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds), Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 820–831.Find this resource:

De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 329–365.Find this resource:

De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2003). Morphological resonance in the mental lexicon. In R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds), Morphological Structure in Language Processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 65–88.Find this resource:

de Reuse, W. (1994). Siberian Yupik Eskimo The Language and Its Contacts with Chukchi. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Find this resource:

de Reuse, W. (2000). Polysynthesis as a typological feature: an attempt at a characterization from Eskimo and Athabascan perspectives. In M.-A. Mahieu and N. Tersis (eds), Variations on Polysynthesis: The Eskaleut languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 19–34.Find this resource:

de Reuse, W. (2006). Polysynthetic language: Central Siberian Yupik. Encylopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Find this resource:

De Schutter, G. (1994). Dutch. In E. König and J. van der Auwera (eds), The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge, 439–477.Find this resource:

De Souza, I. C. (2010). A phonological description of ‘Pet Talk’ in Arara. M. A. thesis, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.Find this resource:

de Vaan, L., Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R.H. (2007). Regular morphologically complex neologisms leave detectable traces in the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon 2(1): 1–24.Find this resource:

de Vooys, C. G. N. (1916). Iets over woordvorming en woordbeteekenis in kindertaal. De Nieuwe Taalgids 10: 93–100, 128–141.Find this resource:

Deacon, S. H. and Bryant, P. (2005). The strength of children’s knowledge of the role of root morphemes in the spelling of derived words. Journal of Child Language 32: 375–389.Find this resource:

Deacon, S. H. and Bryant, P. (2006). Getting to the root: young writers’ sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words. Journal of Child Language 33: 401–417.Find this resource:

Dedrick, J. M., and Casad, E. H. (eds) (1999). Yaqui Language Structures. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Find this resource:

DeFrancis, J. (1984). The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Taipei. [Crane Publishing reprint, 1990.]Find this resource:

DeLancey, S. (1981). The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6(1): 83–101.Find this resource:

Dell, G. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93: 283–321.Find this resource:

Delmas, C. (2000). (-)ABLE en anglais. In J. Pauchard (ed.), La Modalité et les modaux en diachronie et en synchronie. Domaine anglais (Recherches en Linguistique et Psychologie Cognitive: 14). Reims, France: PU de Reims, 151–173.Find this resource:

Denison, D. (2001). Gradience and linguistic change. In L. J. Brinton (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1999. Selected Papers from the 114th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, 9th–13th August 1999. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 119–144.Find this resource:

Denwood, P. (1986). The Tibetan noun-final -s. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 9(1): 97–101.Find this resource:

Denwood, P. (1999). Tibetan. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Deny, J. et al. (1959–64). Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

Derzhanski, I. A. (2005). On diminutive plurals and plural diminutives. Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (p. 809) (MMM4) Catania September 21–23, 2003, University of Bologna. Retrieved from <http://morbo.lingue.unibo.it/mmm/>.Find this resource:

Descoeudres, A. (1922). Le développement de l’enfant de deux à sept ans. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niéstlé.Find this resource:

Detges, U. (forthcoming). The Romance adverbs in -mente: a case study in grammaticalization. In P. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, and F. Rainer (eds), Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Deutsch, A. and Meir, A. (2011). The role of the root morpheme in mediating word production in Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes 26(4–6): 716–744.Find this resource:

Deutsch, A., Frost, R., and Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 24: 1238–1255.Find this resource:

Devlin, J. T., Jamison, H. L., Matthews, P. M., and Gonnerman, L. M. (2004). Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(41): 14984–14988.Find this resource:

DGEEC (Dirección General de Estadística, Encuestas y Censos) (2003). II Censo Nacional Indígena de Población y Viviendas 2002. Pueblos indígenas del Paraguay. Resultados finales. Asunción: Dirección General de Estadística, Encuestas y Censos.Find this resource:

Di Sciullo, A-M. (2005). Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Di Sciullo, A.-M. and Williams, E. (1987). On the Definition of Word (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Diakonoff, I. M. (1988). Afrasian Languages. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

Diakonoff, I. M. and Kogan, L. E. (2007). Akkadian morphology. In A. S. Kaye (ed.), Morphologies of Asia and Africa. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 13–48.Find this resource:

Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., and Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 75–114.Find this resource:

Dietiker, S. R. (1983). En bonne forme. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Find this resource:

Dietz, K. (2004). Die altenglischen Präfixbildungen und ihre Charakteristik. Anglia: Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie 122(4): 561–613.Find this resource:

Dietz, K. (2005). Die altenglischen Nominalpräfixeǣ- und ō-, das Verbalpräfix a- und ihre althochdeutschen Entsprechungen. Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Wortbildung der altgermanischen Sprachen. Sprachwissenschaft 30(1): 1–47.Find this resource:

Diffloth, G. (1976a). Expressives in Semai. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications No. 13. Austroasiatic Studies Part I: 249–264.Find this resource:

Diffloth, G. (1976b). Minor-syllable vocalism in Senoic languages. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications, No. 13. Austroasiatic Studies Part I: 229–247.Find this resource:

Diffloth, G. (1979). Jah-Hut, an Austroasiatic language of Malaysia. Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies 2: 73–118.Find this resource:

Diffloth, G. (2005). The contribution of linguistic palaeontology and Austroasiatic. In L. Sagart, R. Blench, and A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds), The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics: London: Routledge Curzon, 77–80.Find this resource:

Diffloth, G. and Zide, N. (1992). Austro-Asiatic Languages. In W. Bright et al. (eds), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 137–142.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. J. (1982). The two morphological classes in Nilotic. In M. Bechhaus-Gerst and R. Vossen (eds), Nilotic Studies. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer, 269–309.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (1983). The Turkana Language. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. (p. 810) Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. J. (2000). Morphology. In B. Heine and D. Nurse (eds), African Languages: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 161–193.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (2001). Language shift and morphological convergence in the Nilotic area. SUGIA 16–17: 83–124.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (2005). Head marking, dependent marking and constituent order in the Nilotic area. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz (ed.), Studies in African Linguistic Typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 71–92.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (2008). Language ecology and linguistic diversity on the African continent. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5): 840–858.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (2009). Datives in Nilotic. Afrikanistik Online. <urn:nbn:de:0009-10-23558>.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (2010). Differential object marking in Nilo-Saharan. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 31: 13–46.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (2011). Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (2012). Metrical structures: a neglected property of Nilotic (and other African language families). Studies in Nilotic Linguistics 5: 1–26.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (2014).The grammar of knowledge in Tima. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds), The Grammar of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, G. (forthcoming a). Nilo-Saharan. In R. Vossen (ed.), The Handbook of African Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dinh, L. T. (2007). Reduplication in the M’nong language. In M. Alves, P. Sidwell, and D. Gil (eds), SEALS VIII: Papers from the 8th Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1998, 57–65.Find this resource:

Dirven, R. (1999). Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. In K.-U. Panther and G. Radden (eds), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 275–287.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.) (1976). Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (1980). The Languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (1988). A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (2002). Australian Languages: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (2010). Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 1 Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Doerfer, G. (1963). Bemerkungen zur Verwandtschaft der sog. altaische Sprachen. In G. Doerfer (ed.), Türkische und mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen, Bd. I: Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 51–105.Find this resource:

Doerfer, G. (1974). Ist das Japanische mit den altaischen Sprachen verwandt? Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 114(1): 103–142.Find this resource:

Doerfer, G. (1978). Classification problems of Tungus. In G. Doerfer and M. Weiers (eds), Tungusica, Vol. 1. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1–26.Find this resource:

Dokulil, M. (1962). Tvoření slov v češtině I. Teorie odvozování slov. Prague: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd.Find this resource:

Dokulil, M. (1968a). Zur Frage der Konversion und verwandter Wortbildungsvorgänge und -beziehungen. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 3: 215–239.Find this resource:

Dokulil, M. (1968b). Zur Frage der sog. Nullableitung. In H. E. Brekle and L. Lipka (eds), Wortbildung, Syntax und Morphologie. The Hague: Mouton, 55–64.Find this resource:

Don, J. (1993). Morphological conversion. Ph.D. dissertation. Utrecht University, Utrecht. (p. 811) Find this resource:

Don, J. (2003). A note on conversion in Dutch and German. In L. Cornips and P. Fikkert (eds), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 33–43.Find this resource:

Don, J. (2004). Categories in the lexicon. Linguistics 42(5): 931–956.Find this resource:

Don, J. (2005a). On conversion, relisting and zero-derivation. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(2): 2–16.Find this resource:

Don, J. (2005b). Roots, deverbal nouns and denominal verbs. In G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi and S. Scalise (eds), Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4). Catania, September 21–23, 2003, <http://mmm.lingue.unibo.it/mmm-proc/MMM4/MMM4-Proceedings-full.pdf> accessed May 31, 2012.Find this resource:

Donaldson, B. (1994). Afrikaans. In E. König and J. van der Auwera (eds), The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge, 478–504.Find this resource:

Donaldson, T. (1980). Ngiyambaa: The Language of the Wangaaybuwan (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Donegan, P. (1993). Rhythm and vocalic drift in Munda and Mon-Khmer. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 16(1): 1–42.Find this resource:

Donegan, P. J. and Stampe, D. (1983). Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. In J. F. Richardson, M. Marks, and A. Chukerman (eds), Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 337–353.Find this resource:

Dorais, L.-J. (2010). The Language of the Inuit: Syntax, Semantics and Society. Montréal: McGill-Queens University Press.Find this resource:

Doron, E. (2003). Agency and voice: the semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11: 1–67.Find this resource:

Downer, G. B. (1959). Derivation by tone-change in Classical Chinese. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 22: 258–290.Find this resource:

Downing, L. J. (1997). Correspondence effects in Siswati reduplication. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 25: 81–95.Find this resource:

Downing, L. J. (1999a). Morphological constraints on Bantu reduplication. Linguistic Analysis, 29: 6–46.Find this resource:

Downing, L. J. (1999b). Verbal reduplication in three Bantu languages. In R. Kager, H. van der Hulst, and W. Zonneveld, (eds), The Prosody–Morphology Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62–89.Find this resource:

Downing, L. J. (2000). Morphological and prosodic constraints on Kinande verbal reduplication. Phonology 17: 1–38.Find this resource:

Downing, L. (2006). Canonical Forms in Prosodic Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. (1989). On the semantic content of the notion ‘thematic role’. In G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds), Properties, types, and Meaning,Volume II: Semantic Issues, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 69–130.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619.Find this resource:

Dresher, B. E. (2009). The word in Tiberian Hebrew. In K. Hanson and S. Inkelas (eds), The Nature of the Word: Essays in Honor of Paul Kiparsky, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 95–111.Find this resource:

Dresher, B. E. and Johns, A. (1996). The law of double consonants in Inuktitut. Linguistica Atlantica 17: 79–95. (p. 812) Find this resource:

Dressler, W. U. (1968). Studien zur verbalen Pluralität. Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im Lateinischen und Hethitischen. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. (1986). Explanation in natural morphology, illustrated with comparative and agent-noun formation. Linguistics 24: 519–548.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. U. (1987). Word formation as part of natural morphology. In W. U. Dressler, W. Mayerthaler, O. Panagl, and W. U. Wurzel (eds), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 99–126.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. (1988). Preferences vs. strict universals in morphology. In M. Hammond and M. Noonan, (eds), Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 143–154.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. U. (1989). Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissemnschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3–10.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. (1994). Evidence from the first stages of morphology acquisition for linguistic theory: Extragrammatic morphology and diminutives. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 27: 91–108.Find this resource:

Dressler, W.(2005). Word-formation in natural morphology. In P. Štekauer and R. Lieber (eds), Handbook of Word-formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 267–284.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. and Karpf, A. (1995). The theoretical relevance of Pre- and Protomorphology in Language Acquisition. Yearbook of Morphology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. and Ladányi, M. (2000). Productivity in word-formation: a morphological approach. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47: 103–144.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. and Merlini Barberesi, L. (1994). Morphopragmatic—Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Duanmu, S. and Zhang, H. (2010). Phonology and the Chinese Lexicon. CUNY Word Conference, CUNY, New York. a. Abstract: available at: <http://www.cunyphonologyforum.net/WORDABSTRACTS/word-namedabstracts/duanmu-zhang.pdf> accessed August 15, 2012; b. PowerPoint: available at: <http://www-personal.umich.edu/~duanmu/CUNY10Word.pdf> accessed August 15, 2012.Find this resource:

Dubois, J. (1962). Etude sur la derivation suffixale en français moderne et contemporain. Paris: Librairie Larousse.Find this resource:

Dudas, K. (1975). The phonology and morphology of modern Javanese. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.Find this resource:

Dunabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., and Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition 105(3): 691–703.Find this resource:

Dunabeitia, J., Kinoshita, S., Carreiras, M., and Norris, D. (2011). Is morpho-orthographic de-composition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same–different task. Language and Cognitive Processes 26(4–6): 509–529.Find this resource:

Dunn, M. (1999). A grammar of Chukchi. PhD thesis. Australian National University.Find this resource:

Durie, M. (1985). A Grammar of Acehnese: On the Basis of a Dialect of North Aceh. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Durie, M. and Ross, M. D. (eds) (1996). The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dutkova-Cope, L. (2001). The language of Czech Moravians in Texas: do you know what Párknu Káru u Hauza means? Southwest Journal of Linguistics 20: 51–84.Find this resource:

Dybo, A. V. (1996). Semanticheskaja rekonstrukcija v altajskoj etimologii: somaticheskie terminy (plechevoj pojas) [Semantic reconstruction in Altaic etymology: somatic terms]. Moskva: Shkola ‘Jazyki russkoj kuľtury’. (p. 813) Find this resource:

Dybo, A. V. (2000). Mir praaltajcev: Wörter und Sachen. In Problemy izuchenija daľnego rodstva jazykov na rubezhe tretjego tysjacheletija. Moskva: Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj gumanitarnyj univerzitet, 38–48.Find this resource:

Dybo, A. V. and Starostin, G. S. (2008). In defence of the comparative method, or the end of the Vovin controversy. Aspects of Comparative Linguistics 3. Moscow: RSUH Publishers, 109–258.Find this resource:

É. Kiss, K., Kiefer, F. and Siptár, P. (2003), Új magyar nyelvtan [New Hungarian Grammar], Budapest: Osiris, 189–284.Find this resource:

Eckardt, R., von Heusinger, K., and Schwarze, C. (eds) (2003). Words in Time: Diachronic Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Egerod, S. (1965). Verb inflection in Atayal. Lingua 15: 251–282.Find this resource:

Ehret, C. (2001). A Historical-Comparative Reconstruction of Nilo-Saharan. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Eklund, A., Andersson, M., Josephson, C., Johannesson, M., and Knutsson, H. (2012). Does parametric fMRI analysis with SPM yield valid results? An empirical study of 1484 rest datasets. NeuroImage 61(3): 565–578.Find this resource:

Elbers, L. (1988). New names from old words: related aspects of children’s metaphors and word compounds. Journal of Child Language 15: 591–617.Find this resource:

El’konin, D. B. (1973). General course of development in the child of the grammatical structure of the Russian language (according to A. N. Gvozdev). In C. A. Ferguson and D. I. Slobin (eds), Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart andWinston, 565–583.Find this resource:

Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science 33(4): 547–582.Find this resource:

Embick, D. (2004). On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355–392.Find this resource:

Embick, D. (2009). Roots, states, stative passives. Handout of talk presented at Roots, Stuttgart, June 11.Find this resource:

Embick, D. (2010). Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 60). Cambridge: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Embick, D. and Marantz, A. (2008). Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 1–53.Find this resource:

Emeneau, M. (1955). Kolami: A Dravidian Language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Emmerick, R. E. (1983). Some lexical items from the Siddhasāra. In E. Steinkellner and H. Tauscher (eds), Contributions on Tibetan Language, History and Culture. (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 10). Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien, 61–68.Find this resource:

Enfield, N. J. (2004). Adjectives in Lao. In R. M. W. Dixon and A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds), Adjective Classes: A Cross-linguistic Typology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 323–347.Find this resource:

Enfield, N. J. and Diffloth, G. (2009). Phonology and sketch grammar of Kri, a Vietic language of Laos. Cahiers de Linguistique—Asie Orientale (CLAO) 38(1): 3–69.Find this resource:

Engelberg, M. (2002). Finnish: the communication of gender in Finnish. In M. Hellinger and H. Bußmann (eds), Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 109–132.Find this resource:

Engels, J. (2003). Polysemie. In G. Ueding (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Vol. 6. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1530–1537.Find this resource:

Epps, P. (2006). The Vaupés melting pot: Tucanoan influence on Hup. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 267–89. (p. 814) Find this resource:

Erben, J. (1964). Deutsche Wortbildung in synchronischer und diachronischer Sicht. Wirkendes Wort: Deutsche Sprache in Forschung und Lehre 14: 83–93.Find this resource:

Erben, J. (1972). Der sinnesarme Tristan: Zur Wortbildung des Adjektivs bei Gottfried von Straßburg. In Paul und Braunes Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 94 (T), Sonderheft, 182–91.Find this resource:

Erben, J. (1977). Sprachgeschichte als Systemgeschichte. In Institut für Deutsche Sprache Mannheim (ed.), Sprachwandel und Sprachgeschichtsschreibung im Deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart, 41. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Find this resource:

Erben, J. (1983). Einführung in die deutsche Wortbildungslehre. 2nd rev. edn, Berlin: Schmidt.Find this resource:

Erelt, M. and Metslang, H. (2006). Estonian clause patterns—from Finno-Ugric to Standard Average European. Linguistica Uralica 4: 254–66.Find this resource:

Ernestus, M. (2000). Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch. A Corpus-based Study of the Phonology–Phonetics Interface. Utrecht: LOT.Find this resource:

Ernestus, M., Baayen, R. H., and Schreuder, R. (2002). The recognition of reduced word forms. Brain and Language 81: 162–173.Find this resource:

Ernst, T. (2002). The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Ethnologue, Languages of China. Available at: <http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=cn> accessed August 15, 2012

Ettinger, S. (1974). Diminutiv- und Augmentativbildung: Regeln und Restriktionen. Tübingen: Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik.Find this resource:

Ettinger, S. (1980). Form und Funktion in der Wortbildung: die Diminutiv- und Augmentativmodifikation im Lateinischen, Deutschen und Romanischen (Portugiesisch, Spanisch, Italienisch und Rumänisch). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Find this resource:

Evans, N. (1988). Arguments for Pama-Nyungan as a genetic subgroup, with particular reference to initial laminalization. In N. Evans and S. Johnson (eds), Aboriginal Linguistics 1 (1); Armidale: Department of Linguistics, University of New England, 91–110.Find this resource:

Evans, N. (1992). Macassan loans in top end languages. Australian Journal of Lingustics 12: 45–91.Find this resource:

Evans, N. (2003a). Context, culture and structuration in the languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 2003 32: 13–40.Find this resource:

Evans, N. (2003b). An interesting couple: the semantic development of dyad morphemes, Arbeitspapier Nr 47 (Neue Folge). Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft Universität zu Köln.Find this resource:

Evans, N. and Osada, T. (2005). Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9: 351–390.Find this resource:

Evsev’ev, M. E. (1934, 1963), Osnovy mordovskoj grammatiki. Izbrannye trudy. Saransk: Mordovskoe knižnoe izdatel’stvo.Find this resource:

Fabb, N. (1984). Syntactic affixation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

Fabb, N. (1988). Suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(4): 527–539.Find this resource:

Fabre, A. (2012 [2005]). Los pueblos del Gran Chaco y sus lenguas, segunda parte: Los Mataguayo [online updated verstion of the paper published in Suplemento Antropológico 40(2) (2005): 313–435. Asunción, Paraguay].Find this resource:

Fábregas, A. (2007). The internal syntactic structure of relational adjectives. Probus, 17: 1–36.Find this resource:

Fábregas, A. and Scalise, S. (2012), Morphology: From Data to Theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Fabricius, A. H. (1998). A Comparative Survey of Reduplication in Australian Languages. Munich: Lincom Europa. (p. 815) Find this resource:

Fanego, T. (2006). The role of language standardization in the loss of hybrid gerunds in Modern English. In L. E. Breivik, S. Halverson, and K. Haugland (eds), ‘These things write I vnto thee’: Essays in honour of Bjørg Bækken. Oslo: Novus, 93–110.Find this resource:

Farrell, P. (2001). Functional shift as category underspecification. English Language and Linguistics 5(1): 109–130.Find this resource:

Fedjuneva, G. v. (2000), Komi ėmakyv artmöm [Noun formation in Komi.]. Syktyvkar: Rossijasa Naukajas Akadmija [The Russian Academy of Sciences].Find this resource:

Fedjuneva, G. V. and Punegova, G. V. (2002). Komi kyvjyn tor’jakyv’jas artmöm: učebnöj posobie [Word formation in Komi: a (university) textbook]. Syktyvkar: Syktyvkarskij gosudartsvennyj universitet.Find this resource:

Feldman, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(6): 1431–1444.Find this resource:

Feldman, L. and Pastizzo, M. (2003). Morphological facilitation: The role of semantic transparency and family size. In R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds), Morphological Structure in Language Processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 233–258.Find this resource:

Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., and Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: evidence from the masked priming paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 16(4): 684–691.Find this resource:

Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist 66: 103–114.Find this resource:

Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., and Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods 42(2): 488–496.Find this resource:

Figueira, R. A. (1984). On the development of the expression of causativity: a syntactic hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 11: 109–127.Find this resource:

Filbeck, D. (1996). Couplet and duplication in Mal. Mon-Khmer Studies 26: 91–106.Find this resource:

Finkenstaedt, T., Leisi, E., and Wolff, D. (1970). A Chronological English dictionary: Listing 80000 Words in Order of their Earliest Known Occurence. Heidelberg: Winter.Find this resource:

Finley, S. (2009). Morphemic harmony as featural correspondence. Lingua 119: 478–501.Find this resource:

Fitch, W. T. (2010). The Evolution of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Fitzgerald, C. M. (2000). Vowel hiatus and faithfulness in Tohono O’odham reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 713–722.Find this resource:

Fitzgerald, C. M. (2001). The morpheme-to-stress principle in Tohono O’Odham. Linguistics 39: 941–972.Find this resource:

Fleischer, W. (1982). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Fleischer, W. (2000). Die Klassifikation von Wortbildungsprozessen. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds), Morphologie/Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 886–897.Find this resource:

Fleischer, W. and Barz, I. (1995). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 2nd rev. edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Fleischer, W. and Barz, I. (2007). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Fleischer, W. and Barz, I. (2012). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 4th rev. edn. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Fleischman, S. (1977). Cultural and Linguistic Factors in Word Formation: An Integrated Approach to the Development of the Suffix -age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Flores Farfán, J. A. (2004). Notes on Nahuatl typological change. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 57: 85–97. (p. 816) Find this resource:

Fodor, J. (1970). Three reasons for not deriving ‘kill’ from ‘cause to die’. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 429–438.Find this resource:

Ford, M. A., Davis, M. H., and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2010). Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency. Journal of Memory and Language 63(1): 117–130.Find this resource:

Forster, K. (1999). The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language 68(1–2): 5–15.Find this resource:

Forster, K. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory and Cognition 28: 1109–1115.Find this resource:

Fortescue, M. (1980). Affix ordering in West Greenlandic derivational processes. International Journal of American Linguistics 46(4): 259–278.Find this resource:

Fortescue, M. (1983). A Comparative Manual of Affixes for the Inuit dialects of Greenland, Canada and Alaska. Copenhagen: Meddelelser om Grønland.Find this resource:

Fortescue, M. (1984). West Greenlandic (Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars). London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Fortescue, M. (1992). Morphophonemic complexity and typological stability in a polysynthetic language family. International Journal of American Linguistics 58(2): 242–248.Find this resource:

Fortescue, M. (1995). The historical source and typological position of ergativity in Eskimo languages. Études/Inuit/Studies 19(2): 61–75.Find this resource:

Fortescue, M., Jacobson, S. and Kaplan, L. (2010). Comparative Eskimo Dictionary: With Aleut Cognates. 2nd edn, Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center Research Paper Number 9, University of Alaska.Find this resource:

Fowler, C. S. (1983). Lexical Clues to Uto-Aztecan Prehistory. International Journal of American Linguistics 49: 224–257.Find this resource:

Fradin, B. (2009). IE, Romance: French. In R. Lieber and P. Štekauer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 417–435.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. (1981). Some rules concerning vowels in Chadic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 44(2): 334–348.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. (1989). A Grammar of Pero. Berlin: Reimer.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. (1993). A Grammar of Mupun. Berlin: Reimer.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. (2001). A Grammar of Lele (Stanford Monographs in African Linguistics). Stanford: CSLI.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. (2008). A Grammar of Gidar. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. (2012). A Grammar of Wandala. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. and Koops, R. (1989). Double epenthesis and N-class in Chadic. In Z. Frajzyngier (ed.), Current Progress in Chadic Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 233–250.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z., with Shay, E. (2002). A Grammar of Hdi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. and Shay, E. (2012). Chadic. In Z. Frajzyngier and E. Shay (eds), The Afroasiatic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 236–341.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z. and Johnston, E. with Edwards, A. (2005). A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Francis, B., Robson, J., and Read, B. (2001). An analysis of undergraduate writing styles in the context of gender and achievement. Studies in Higher Education 26(3): 313–326.Find this resource:

Francis, G. (2013). Publication bias in ‘Red, Rank, and Romance in Women Viewing Men’ by Elliot et al. (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142(1): 292–296.Find this resource:

Fraser-Knowles, J. and Oakes, M. (1996). A new Bundjalung language: Baryulgil Square Talk. In M. Sharpe (ed.), An Introduction to the Yugambeh-Bundjalung Language and its Dialects (Armidale: The Author), 133–55. (p. 817) Find this resource:

Frauenfelder, U. H. and Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. E. Booij and J. v. Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 165–183.Find this resource:

Fromkin, V. (ed.) (2000). Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Frost, R., Forster, K. I., and Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 829–856.Find this resource:

Frost, R., Deutsch, A., and Forster, K. (2000a). Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(3): 751–765.Find this resource:

Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2000b). Morphological priming: dissociation of phonological, semantic and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition 28(8): 1277–1288.Find this resource:

Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., and Forster, K. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morpho-logical structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(6): 1293–1326.Find this resource:

Fuller, E. (1977). Chru phonemes. Pacific Linguistics A, 48: 77–86.Find this resource:

Furdík, J. (2004). Slovenská slovotvorba. Prešov: Náuka.Find this resource:

Gaeta, L. (2005). Combinazioni di suffissi in Italiano. In M. Grossmann and A. M. Thornton (eds). La formazione delle parole. Atti del XXXVII congresso internatzionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana. Roma: Bulzoni, 229–247.Find this resource:

Gaeta, L. (2008). The Copernican revolution of affix ordering. Paper presented at the Workshop on affix ordering in typologically different languages. Vienna, February 3–4.Find this resource:

Gage, W. W. (1985). Vietnamese in Mon-Khmer perspective. In S. Ratanakul et al. (eds), Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies Presented to André-G. Haudricourt. Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University, 493–524.Find this resource:

Gahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84(3): 474–496.Find this resource:

Galand, L. (2002). Problématique du nom verbal en berbère. In K. Naït-Zerrad (ed.), Articles de linguistique berbère. Mémorial Werner Vycichl. Paris: L’Harmattan, 219–234.Find this resource:

Galand, L. (2010). Regards sur le berbère. Milan: Centro Studi Camito-Semitici.Find this resource:

Gallego, Á. (2010). Predicados ligeros y valoración de rasgos. Dicenda 28: 27–55.Find this resource:

Gamillscheg, E. (1921). Grundzüge der galloromanischen Wortbildung. In E. Gamillscheg and L. Spitzer (eds), Beiträge zur romanischen Wortbildungslehre. Geneva: Olschki, 1–80.Find this resource:

Ganiev, F. A. (2006). Types of affixes in Turkic Languages. In E. V. Boikova and R. B. Rybakov (eds), Kinship in the Altaic World: Proceedings of the 48th PIAC. Weisbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 139–44.Find this resource:

Gardner, A.-C. (2012). Abstract Noun ‘Suffixes’ and Text Type in Old English. In H. Sauer and G. Waxenberger (eds), English Historical Linguistics 2008. Selected papers from the fifteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 15), Munich, 24–30 August 2008. Volume II: Words, texts and genres. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 119–132.Find this resource:

Garrett, A. (2001). Reduplication and infixation in Yurok: morphology, semantics and diachrony. International Journal of American Linguistics 67: 264–312.Find this resource:

Gast, V. and van der Auwera, J. (2006). What is ‘contact-induced grammaticalization’? Evidence from Mayan and Mixe-Zoquean languages. Typescript, University of Antwerp.Find this resource:

Geeraerts, D. (1993). Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 223–272. (p. 818) Find this resource:

Geilich, B. (1994). Nasal-Suffigierung. Eine Studie zur vergleichenden Morphologie der indo-chinesischen Sprachen. Münster: Ostasiatisches Seminar.Find this resource:

Genetti, C., Bartee, E., Coupe, A., Hildebrandt, K., and Lin, Y.-J. (2008). Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan Area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2): 97–144.Find this resource:

Georg, S. (1999/2000). Haupt und Glieder der altaischen Hypothese. Die Körperteilbezeichnungen im Türkischen, Mongolischen und Tungusischen. Ural-altaische Jahrbücher, neue Folge B 16: 143–182.Find this resource:

Georg, S. (2004). Review of Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages. Diachronica 21(20): 445–450.Find this resource:

Georg, S. (2005). Reply [to Starostin 2005]. Diachronica 22(2): 455–457.Find this resource:

Georg, S. (2007). A Descriptive Grammar of Ket. Part I: Introduction, Phonology and Morphology. Kent, UK: Global Oriental.Find this resource:

Georg, S., Michalove, P. A., Manaster Ramer, A., and Sidwell, P. J. (1999). Telling general linguists about Altaic. Journal of Linguistics 35: 65–98.Find this resource:

Gerdts, D. B. (2003). The morphosyntax of Halkomelem lexical suffixes. International Journal of American Linguistics 69(4): 345–356.Find this resource:

Gerzenstein, A. (1978). Lengua Chorote. Buenos Aires: University of Buenos Aires.Find this resource:

Gerzenstein, A. (1979). Lengua Chorote II, Vocabulario. Buenos Aires: University of Buenos Aires.Find this resource:

Gerzenstein, A. (1983). Lengua Chorote. Variedad No. 2. Buenos Aires: University of Buenos Aires.Find this resource:

Gerzenstein, A. (1994). Lengua Maká. Estudio descriptivo. Buenos Aires: Univsersity of Buenos Aires.Find this resource:

Gerzenstein, A. (1997a). Chorote word list. In M. R. Key (ed.), South American Indian Languages. Computer Database.Find this resource:

Gerzenstein, A. (1997b). Maka word list. In M. R. Key (ed.), South American Indian Languages. Computer Database.Find this resource:

Gerzenstein, A. (2002). La negación en la lengua maká (mataguayo). Una presentación preliminar. In A. Fernández Garay and L. Golluscio (eds), Temas de lingüística aborigen II. Buenos Aires: University of Buenos Aires, 27–52.Find this resource:

Gerzenstein, A. (2004). Las consonantes laterales y las labializadas en lenguas mataguayas del Chaco argentino paraguayo. In Z. Estrada et al. (eds), Estudios en lenguas amerindias. México: University of Sonora, 183–197.Find this resource:

Ghomeshi, J., Jackendoff, R., Rosen, N., and Russell, K. (2004). Contrastive focus reduplication in English (The Salad-Salad Paper). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 307–357.Find this resource:

Giakoumaki, E. (2000). Euphemism. A Linguistic Approach. Athens: Eleftheria Giakoumak.Find this resource:

Giegerich, H. (1999). Lexical Strata in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gil, D. (2011). Distributive numerals. In M. S. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, ch. 54.Find this resource:

Gilbers, D. G., Nerbonne, J., and Schaeken, J. (eds) (2000). Languages in Contact. (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics, 28). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Find this resource:

Gillis, S. (1997). The acquisition of diminutives in Dutch. In W. Dressler (ed.), Studies in Pre- and Protomorphology. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 165–179.Find this resource:

Gimba, A. M. (2000). Bole verb morphology. PhD dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles. (p. 819) Find this resource:

Giraudo, H. and Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8: 127–131.Find this resource:

Giraudo, H. and Grainger, J. (2003). On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. In R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds), Morphological Structure in Language Processing. Berlin: Mouton, 211–234.Find this resource:

Girault Duvivier, C. (1822), Grammaire des grammaires, ou analyse raisonnée des meilleurs traités sur la langue françoise. 5th edn, Paris: Janet and Cotelle.Find this resource:

Givón, T. (1993). English Grammar. A Function-based Introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gleitman, L. R. and Gleitman, H. (1970). Phrase and Paraphrase: Some Innovative Uses of Language. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Find this resource:

Gleitman, L. R. and Gleitman, H. (1979). Language use and language judgement. In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, and W. S.-Y. Wang (eds), Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behaviour. New York: Academic Press, 103–126.Find this resource:

Göksel, A. and Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goldenberg, G. (1994). Principles of Semitic word structure. In G. Goldenberg and S. Raz (eds), Semitic and Cushitic Studies. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 29–64.Find this resource:

Goldsmtih, J. (1976). Autosegmental Phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Find this resource:

Golla, V. (1970). Hupa grammar. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California Berkeley.Find this resource:

Golla, V. K. (2007). North America. In Christopher Moseley (ed.), Encyclopedia of the World’s Endangered Languages. London: Routledge. 1–96.Find this resource:

Golluscio, L. and Vidal, A. (2009/10). Recorrido sobre las lenguas del Chaco y los aporte a la investigación lingüística, Amerindia. Les Langues du Chaco 33/34: 3–40.Find this resource:

Gomez-Imbert, E. (1996). When animals become ‘rounded’ and ‘feminine’: conceptual categories and linguistic classification in a multilingual setting. In J. Gumperz and S. Levinson (eds), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 438–69.Find this resource:

Gong Hwang-Cherng 龚煌成(1977). 古藏文的y及其相關問題 guzangwen de y ji qixiangguan wenti [Ancient Tibetan y and related questions]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 48(2): 205–228. (reprinted in) Gong Hwang-Cherng龔煌城 (2002). 漢藏語硏究論文集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji / Collected Papers on Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Taipei: 中央硏究院語言學硏究所籌備處 Zhong yang yan jiu yuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu, 379–399.Find this resource:

Gonnerman, L. and Anderson, E. (2001). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in morphologically complex words. In S. Bendjaballah, W. Dressler, O. E. Pfeiffer, and M. D. Voeikova (eds), Morphology 2000: Selected Papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 37–148.Find this resource:

González, H. A. (2005). A Grammar of Tapiete (Tupi-Guarani). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Find this resource:

Gonzalez-Diaz, V. (2008). English Adjective Comparison: A Historical Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (p. 820) Find this resource:

Gooch, A. (1970). Diminutive, Augmentative and Pejorative Suffixes in Modern Spanish. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Find this resource:

Good, J. (2003). Strong linearity: three case studies towards a theory of morphosyntactic templatic constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Good, J. (2006). Rarum begets rarum: a rare clitic and morphosyntactic reduplication in Chechen and Ingush. Rara and Rarissima conference. Max Planck Insititute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig. Downloadable from <http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jcgood/jcgood-Rara-Chechen.pdf>.Find this resource:

Goudswaard, N. E. (2005). The Begak (Ida’an) language of Sabah. Amsterdam: LOT Publications.Find this resource:

Gràcia, L. and Turon, L. (2000). On appreciative suffixes. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47(1–4): 231–247.Find this resource:

Gradin, D. (1976). Word affixation in Jeh. Mon-Khmer Studies 5: 25–42.Find this resource:

Gragg, G. B. and Hoberman, R. D. (2012). Semitic. In Z. Frajzyngier and E. Shay (eds), The Afroasiatic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 145–235.Find this resource:

Grainger, J. and Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 103: 518–565.Find this resource:

Grammatika (1980). = D. V. Cygankin (ed.), Grammatika mordovskih jazykov. Saransk: Mordovskij gos. universitet.Find this resource:

Grandi, N. (2005). Sardinian evaluative morphology in typological perspective. In I. Putzu (ed.), Sardinian in Typological Perspective. Bochum: Dr. Brockmeyer University Press, 188–209.Find this resource:

Grandi, N. (2011a). Evaluative Affixes between Inflection and Derivation: A Typological Survey. Societas Linguistica Europaea—44th Annual Meeting. Universidad de la Rioja, Logrono. September 10, 2011. Lecture.Find this resource:

Grandi, N. (2011b). Renewal and innovation in the emergence of Indo-European evaluative morphology. Lexis 6: 5–25.Find this resource:

Grandi, N. and Körtvelyessy, L. (eds). (forthcoming). Handbook of Evaluative Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Graziano-King, J. (1999). Acquisition of comparative forms in English. Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.Find this resource:

Graziano-King, J. and Cairns, H. (2005). The acquisition of English comparatives. Journal of Child Language 32(2): 345–373.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. (1950). The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 6: 162–181.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. (1955). Studies in African Linguistic Classification. New Haven, CT: Compass Publishing.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. (1956). The general classification of Central and South American Indian languages. In A. Wallace (ed.), 1960. Men and Cultures: Selected Papers of the 5th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 791–794.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. (1957). The nature and uses of linguistic typologies. International Journal of American Linguistics 23 (2): 68–77.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. (1963a). Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. (1963b). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 73–113.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. (1963c). The Languages of Africa. (International Journal of American Linguistics 29.1, Part II). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. (1987). Language in the Americas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. (p. 821) Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. (2000–2002). Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives: The Eurasiatic Language Family, 2 volumes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Greenhill, S.J., Blust R., and Gray, R. D. (2008). The Austronesian basic vocabulary database; from bioinformatics to lexomics. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 4: 271–283.Find this resource:

Gregerson, K. (1979). Predicate and Argument in Rengao Grammar. Dallas, TX: University of Texas at Arlington, SIL.Find this resource:

Grégoire, A. (1947). L’apprentissage du langage. Les deux premières années. Liège/Paris: Droz.Find this resource:

Gregová, R. (2009). On phonetic iconicity in evaluative morphology of West Slavonic languages, Sučasni doslidžennja z inozemnoji filolohiji. Vypusk 7: zbirnyk naukovych prac. Užhorod: Užhorodskyj nacionaľnyj universytet, 90–93.Find this resource:

Gregová, R., Körtvélyessy, L., and Zimmermann, J. (2010). Phonetic iconicity in the evaluative morphology of a sample of Indo-European, Niger-Congo and Austronesian languages. Word Structure 3(2): 156–180.Find this resource:

Grevisse, M. (1980). Le bon usage. Grammaire française avec des Remarques sur la langue française d’aujourd’hui, onzième édition revue. Paris/Gembloux: Duculot.Find this resource:

Grimes, S. (2002). Morphological gemination and root augmentation in three Muskogean languages. MS., Indiana University.Find this resource:

Grimm, J. (1819–1837). Deutsche Grammatik, 4 Tle, Teil 2. 1826. Göttingen: Dieterich’sche Buchhandlung.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, J. (1993). Semantic structure and semantic content in lexical representation. Unpublished MS. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, J. (2005). Words and Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Grönke, U. (1955). Die Diminutiva des Isländischen. Ein Beitrag zur isländischen Wortkunde. Göttingen.Find this resource:

Grossmann, M. and Rainer, F. (2004). La formazione delle parole in italiano. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Grünthal, R. (2000). Typological characteristics of the Finnic languages: a reappraisal. In J. Laakso (ed.), Facing Finnic: Some Challenges to Historical and Contact Linguistics. Castrenianumin toimitteita 59. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto, suomalais-ugrilainen laitos, 31–63.Find this resource:

Grzegorczykowa, R., Laskowski, R., and Wróbel, H. (eds) (1999). Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego: Morfologia. Warszawa: PWN.Find this resource:

Gualdieri, B. (1998). Mocoví (Guaicuru). Fonologia e morfossintaxe. Ph.D. dissertation, Campinas: Universtity of Campinas.Find this resource:

Guasch, A. (1983). El idioma Guaraní. Gramática y antología de prosa y verso. 6th edn, Asunción: Loyola.Find this resource:

Guilbert, L. (1975). La créativité lexicale. Paris: Librairie Larousse.Find this resource:

Guilfoyle, E. (2000). Tense and N-Features in Modern Irish. In A. Carnie and E. Guilfoyle (eds), The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 61–74.Find this resource:

Guillaume, A. (2008). A grammar of Cavineña. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Gurdon, P. R.T. (1914). The Khasis. Government of Eastern Bengal and Assam. Available through Project Gutenburg.Find this resource:

Gurubasave Gowda, K. S. (1975). Ao Grammar. Manasagangotri, Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Find this resource:

Gustafsson, A. (1979). Treáringars språkliga kreativiteit [The linguistic creativity of three-year-olds]. Paper No. 2, Child Language Research Institute, Stockholm University.Find this resource:

Gvozdev, A. N. (1961). Voprosy izucheniya detskoy rechi [The development of language in children]. Moscow: Akademii Pedagogicheskikh Nauk RSFSR. (p. 822) Find this resource:

Györke, J. (1934), Die Wortbildungslehre des Uralischen. (Primäre Wortbildungssuffixe). Tartu: Krüger.Find this resource:

Gyurmé, K. (1992). Le claire miroir: enseignement de la grammaire tibétaine. Villeurbanne: Arvillard.Find this resource:

Haas, M. R. and Swadesh, M. (1932). A journey to the other world. International Journal of American Linguistics 7: 195–208.Find this resource:

Haase, M. (1992). Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel im Baskenland: die Einflüsse des Gaskognischen und Französischen auf das Baskische. Hamburg: Buske.Find this resource:

Haase, M. (1997). Gascon et basque: bilinguisme et substrat. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 50(3): 189–228.Find this resource:

Haberland, H. (1994). Danish. In E. König and J. van der Auwera (eds), The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge, 313–348.Find this resource:

Hagiwara, H., Sugioka, Y., Ito, T., Kawamura, M., and Shiota, J. (1999). Neurolinguistic evidence for rule-based nominal suffixation. Language 75(4): 739–763.Find this resource:

Hahn, M. (1997). A propos the term gtsug-lag. In H. Krasser, M. T. Much, E. Steinkellner, H. Tauscher (eds), Proceedings of the 7th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 341–348.Find this resource:

Haig, G. (2001). Linguistic diffusion in present-day East Anatolia: from top to bottom. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195–224.Find this resource:

Haig, G. (2004). Constraints on morpheme repetition in Turkish? In K. Imer and G. Dogan (eds), Current Research in Turkish Linguistics. Gazimagusa: Eastern Mediterranean University Press, 3–12.Find this resource:

Haiman, J. (1974). Concessives, conditionals, and verbs of volition. Foundations of Language 11: 341–359.Find this resource:

Haiman, J. (1997). Repetition and identity. Lingua 100: 57–70.Find this resource:

Hajdú, P. (1987). Die uralischen Sprachen. In P. Hajdú and P. Domokos (eds), Die uralischen Sprachen und Literaturen. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 21–450.Find this resource:

Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., and Alho, I. (2004). Iso suomen kielioppi. [Extensive grammar of Finnish] Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Online version: <http://scripta.kotus.fi/visk>.Find this resource:

Hakulinen, L. (1961). The structure and development of the Finnish language. Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series, 3. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. [English translation of an earlier edition of Hakulinen (1979).]Find this resource:

Hakulinen, L. (1979). Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys. [The structure and development of the Finnish language]. 4th edn. Helsinki: Otava.Find this resource:

Hale, K. (1965). Some preliminary observations on Papago morphophonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 31: 295–305.Find this resource:

Hale, K. L., and Keyser, S. J. (1987). A View from the Middle (Lexicon Project Working Papers 10). Cambridge, MA: MIT, Center for Cognitive Science.Find this resource:

Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds) (1993). The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (1998). The basic elements of argument structure. In Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect, MITWPL 32: 73–118.Find this resource:

Hale, K. L., and Keyser, S. J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hale, K., Laughren, M., and Simpson, J. (1996). Warlpiri Syntax. In J. Jacobs (ed.), Handbook of Syntax (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 1430–1451. (p. 823) Find this resource:

Hall, C. J. (1992). Morphology and Mind. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Hall, R. (1956). How we noun-incorporate in English. American Speech 31: 83–88.Find this resource:

Hallap, V. (2000). Verbaaltuletussufiksid mordva keeltes. [Verbal derivation suffixes in the Mordvin languages]. Eesti Keele Instituudi Toimetised 5. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus. [Estonian-language version of an unpublished dissertation from 1955.]Find this resource:

Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 3–16.Find this resource:

Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–176.Find this resource:

Halle, M. and Mohanan, K. P. (1985). Segmental phonology of Modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 57–116.Find this resource:

Haller, F. (2009). Switch-reference in Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32(2): 45–106.Find this resource:

Haller, S. and Bartsch, A. J. (2009). Pitfalls in fMRI. European Radiology 19(11): 2689–2706.Find this resource:

Hanique, I. and Ernestus, M. (2012). The role of morphology in acoustic reduction. Lingue e Linguaggio 11(2): 147–164.Find this resource:

Haman, E. (2003). Early productivity in derivation: a case study of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish. Psychology of Language and Communication 7: 37–56.Find this resource:

Haman, E., Zevenbergen, A., Andrus, M., and Chmielewska, M. (2009). Coining compounds and derivations—a crosslinguistic elicitation of word-formation abilities of preschool children and adults in Polish and English. Polish Psychological Bulletin 40: 176–192.Find this resource:

Handel, Z. (2008). What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux. Language and Linguistics Compass 2/3: 422–441.Find this resource:

Hardy, H. and Montler, T. (1988a). Alabama radical morphology. In W. Shipley (ed.), In Honor of Mary Haas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 377–409.Find this resource:

Hardy, H. and T. Montler (1988b). Imperfective gemination in Alabama. International Journal of American Linguistics 54: 399–415.Find this resource:

Hargus, S. (2007). Witsuwit’en Grammar: Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology. Vancouver: UBC Press.Find this resource:

Harley, H. (2005). How do verbs get their names? denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English. In N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport (eds), The Syntax of Aspect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 42–64.Find this resource:

Harley, H. (2009). Compounding in distributed morphology. In R. Lieber and P. Štekauer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129–144.Find this resource:

Harley, H. (2011). On the identity of roots. University of Arizona, ms. <http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/001527>.Find this resource:

Harley, H. (2012). Lexical decomposition in modern generative grammar. In W. Hinzen, M. Werning, and E. Mach (eds), Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 328–350.Find this resource:

Harley, H. and Florez Leyva, M. (2009). Form and meaning in Hiaki (Yaqui) verbal reduplication. International Journal of American Linguistics 75: 233–272.Find this resource:

Harley, H. and Noyer, R. (1999). Distributed morphology. GLOT International 4(4): 3–9.Find this resource:

Harley, H. and Noyer, R. (2000). Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon. In B. Peeters (ed.), The Lexicon/Encyclopedia Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press, 349–374.Find this resource:

Harley, H. and Noyer, R. (2003). Distributed morphology. In L. Cheng and R. Sybesma (eds), The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book: The Latest in Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 462–496. (p. 824) Find this resource:

Harm, M. W. and Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: co-operative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 111: 662–720.Find this resource:

Harper, K. (1979). Suffixes of the Eskimo Dialects of Cumberland Peninsula and North Baffin Island (Mercury Series No. 54). Ottawa: National Museum of Man.Find this resource:

Harris, A. (2006). Revisiting anaphoric islands. Language 82: 114–130.Find this resource:

Harris, A. C. and Campbell, L. (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Harris, Z. (1946). From morpheme to utterance. Language 22(3): 161–183.Find this resource:

Harris, Z. (1955). From phoneme to morpheme. Language 31(2): 190–222.Find this resource:

Harrison, S. P. (1973). Reduplication in Micronesian languages. Oceanic Linguistics 12: 407–454.Find this resource:

Harrison, S. P. (1976). Mokilese Reference Grammar. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.Find this resource:

Hartshorne, J. K. and Ullman, M. T. (2006). Why girls say ‘holded’ more than boys. Developmental Science 9: 21–32.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (1990). The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14: 25–72.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (1993). More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In B. Comrie and M. Polinsky (eds), Causatives and Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 87–120.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (1996). Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 43–66.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (1998). How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20(3): 271–287.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (2001). The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, and W. Raible (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook. Vol. 2. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 20.2). New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1492–1510.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding Morphology. London: Edward Arnold.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (2003). The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 211–242.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, and H. Perridon (eds), Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 59). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 17–44.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (2009). An empirical test of the agglutination hypothesis. In S. Scalise, E. Magni, and A. Bisetto (eds), Universals of Language Today (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 76). Dordrecht: Springer, 13–29.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M., and Müller-Bardey, T. (2004). Valence change. In C. Lehmann et al. (eds), Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung [An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation]. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 1130–1145.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. and Sims, A. (2010). Understanding Morphology. 2nd edn. London: Hodder Education.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W., and Raible, W. (eds) (2001). Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook. Vol. 2. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 20.2). New York: Walter de Gruyter. (p. 825) Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hathout, N. and Tanguy, L. (2002). Webaffix: finding and validating morphological links on the www. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 1799–1804.Find this resource:

Haugen, E. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language 26: 210–231.Find this resource:

Haugen, J. (2008a). Denominal verbs in Uto-Aztecan. International Journal of American Linguistics 74(4): 439–70.Find this resource:

Haugen, J. (2008b). Morphology at the Interfaces: Reduplication and Noun Incorporation in Uto-Aztecan. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Haugen, J. (2009). Three challenges for Morphological Doubling Theory. Meertens Instituut, Amsterdam. <http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~exponet/Slides/Amsterdam/Haugen.pdf>.Find this resource:

Hauk, O., Davis, M., Ford, M., Pulvermller, F., and Marslen-Wilson, W. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. NeuroImage 30: 1383–1400.Find this resource:

Haviland, J. (2006). Documenting lexical knowledge. In J. Gippert, N. Himmelmann, and U. Mosel (eds), Essentials of Language Documentation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 129–162.Find this resource:

Hawkins, J. and Gilligan, G. (1988). Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order. Lingua 74: 219–259.Find this resource:

Hay, J. B. (2000). Causes and consequences of word structure. Ph.D. dissertation. Northwestern University.Find this resource:

Hay, J. B. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: is everything relative? Linguistics 39(6): 141–170.Find this resource:

Hay, J. B. (2002). From speech perception to morphology: affix-ordering revisited. Language 78: 527–555.Find this resource:

Hay, J. B. (2003). Causes and Consequences of Word Structure. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Hay, J. B. and R. H. Baayen. (2002). Parsing and productivity. In G. E. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 2001. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 203–235.Find this resource:

Hay, J. B. and Baayen, R. H. (2005). Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(7): 342–348.Find this resource:

Hay, J. B. and Plag, I. (2004). What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(3): 565–596.Find this resource:

Hay, J. B., Kennedy, C. and Levin, B. (1999). Scalar structure underlies telicity in degree achievements. In T. Matthews and D. Strolovitch (eds), Proceedings of SALT IX. CLC Publications, 127–144.Find this resource:

Hayashi, M. (2011). The structure of multiple tenses in Inuktitut. Ph.D. thesis. University of Toronto.Find this resource:

Hayes, B. and Abad. M. (1989). Reduplication and syllabification in Ilokano. Lingua 77: 331–374.Find this resource:

Hayward, R. J. (2003). Omotic. The ‘empty quarter’ of Afroasiatic linguistics. In J. Lecarme (ed.), Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II. Selected Papers from the Fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Paris, 2000. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 241–262.Find this resource:

Headley, R. (1977). A Pearic vocabulary. Mon-Khmer Studies Journal 6: 69–149.Find this resource:

Healey, P. M. (1960). An Agta Grammar. Manila: Bureau of Printing.Find this resource:

Heath, J. (1978). Uto-Aztecan _na-class verbs. International Journal of American Linguistics 44: 211–22.Find this resource:

Heath, J. (2005). A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (p. 826) Find this resource:

Heeschen, V. (1978). The Mek Languages of Irian Jaya with Special Reference to the Eipo Language. (grammar_sketch). Irian VII: 2.Find this resource:

Heine, B. (1994). Areal influence on grammaticalization. In Pütz, M. (ed.), Language Contact and Language Conflict. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 56–68.Find this resource:

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. (2002). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. (2003). Contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27: 529–72.Find this resource:

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. (2005). Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. (2006). The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. (2010). Contact and grammaticalization. In R. Hickey (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Oxford: Blackwell, 86–105.Find this resource:

Heine, B. and Miyashita, H. (2008). Accounting for a functional category: German drohen ‘to threaten’. Language Sciences 30: 53–101.Find this resource:

Heine, B. and Reh, M. (1984). Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.Find this resource:

Heine, B., Claudi, U., and Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Hellwig, B. (2011). A Grammar of Goemai. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Henderson, J. (2003). The word in Eastern/Central Arrernte. In R. M. W. Dixon and A.Y. Aikhenvald (eds), Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–124.Find this resource:

Henderson, J. and Dobson, V. (1994). Eastern and Central Arrernte to English Dictionary. Alice Springs: Institute for Aboriginal Development.Find this resource:

Hengeveld, K. (1992). Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Henzen, W. ([1947] 1965). Deutsche Wortbildung. 3rd edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Henzen, W. (1947). Deutsche Wortbildung. Sammlung kurzer Grammatiken germanischer Dialekte: B, Ergänzungsreihe, 5. Halle: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Hercus, L. A. (1982). The Bāgandji Language. Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

Hercus, L. A. (1993). Paakantyi Dictionary. Canberra: The Author, with the assistance of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.Find this resource:

Hercus, L. A. (1994). A Grammar of the Arabana-Wangkangurru Language, Lake Eyre Basin, South Australia, Series C-128. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Hetzron, R. (1972). Ethiopian Semitic: Studies in Classification. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Find this resource:

Hetzron, R. (ed.) (1997). The Semitic Languages. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Hewson, J. (1990). The Micmac Grammar of Father Pacifique. Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics.Find this resource:

Heyvaert, L. (2006). A symbolic approach to deverbal -ee derivation. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 337–364.Find this resource:

Heyvaert, L. (2010). A cognitive-functional perspective on deverbal nominalizations in English. Descriptive findings and theoretical ramifications. In M. Rathert and A. Alexiadou (eds), The Semantics of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 51–82.Find this resource:

Hickey, R. (ed.) (2003). Motives for Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (p. 827) Find this resource:

Hilkenbach, L. (2011). Can complexity-based ordering be extended from English to German? Paper presented at the 3rd Vienna Workshop on Affix Order: Advances in Affix Order Research. Vienna, January 15–16.Find this resource:

Hill, J. (1970). A peeking rule in Cupeño. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 534–539.Find this resource:

Hill, J. H. (2001). Proto-Uto-Aztecan: a community of cultivators in Central Mexico? American Anthropologist 103: 913–934.Find this resource:

Hill, J. (2010). Dating Proto-Uto-Aztecan: New Evidence from Linguistic Paleontology and Lexicostatistics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Friends of Uto-Aztecan Conference, Guadalajara, Mexico.Find this resource:

Hill, J. and Nolasquez, R. (1973). Mulu’wetum: The First People. Cupeño Oral History and Language. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press.Find this resource:

Hill, J. and Zepeda, O. (1992). Derived words in Tohono O’odham. International Journal of American Linguistics 58: 355–404.Find this resource:

Hill, N. W. (2009). Review of Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. ed. J. A. Matisoff. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. [語言暨語言學 Languages and Linguistics 10(1): 173–195.]Find this resource:

Hill, N. W. (2010a). A Lexicon of Tibetan Verb Stems as Reported by the Grammatical Tradition. Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Find this resource:

Hill, N. W. (2010b). The converb -las in Old Tibetan. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 73(2): 245–260.Find this resource:

Hill, N. W. (2010c). An overview of Old Tibetan synchronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society 108(2): 110–125.Find this resource:

Hill, N. W. (2011a). An inventory of Tibetan sound laws. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (3rd Series) 21(4): 441–457.Find this resource:

Hill, N. W. (2011b). Alternances entreḥet b en tibétain ancien et dans les langues tibétaines modernes. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 20: 115–122.Find this resource:

Hill, N. W. (2012). Tibetan -las, -nas, and -bas. Cahiers de Linguistique—Asie Orientale 41(1): 3–38.Find this resource:

Hill, N. W. (forthcoming). A note on voicing alternation in the Tibetan verbal system. Transactions of the Philological Society.Find this resource:

Hiltunen, R. (1983). The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb: The Evidence from Some Old and Early Middle English Texts. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Find this resource:

Hoàng, Tuệ, Lý Toàn Thắng, Tạ Văn Thông, et. al. (1986). Ngữ pháp Tiếng Kơho (A Grammar of Koho). Lam Dong, Vietnam: Sở Văn Hóa và Thông Tin Lâm Đông.Find this resource:

Hoàng, Văn Hành (1985). Từ láy trong Tiếng Việt (Reduplication in Vietnamese). Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Khoa Học Xã Hội.Find this resource:

Hoàng, Văn Hành (1993). Từ láy trong các ngôn ngữ KatuicởViệt Nam (Reduplication in the Katuic languages in Vietnam). Ngôn Ngữ 4: 8–17.Find this resource:

Hoàng, Văn Hành (1998). Từ Láy Đôi trong Tiếng Mường (Reduplication in Muong). In Từ Láy: Những Vấn Đề Còn Để Ngỏ (Reduplication: Issues to Consider). Hanoi: Institute of Linguistics, 165–193.Find this resource:

Hoàng, Văn Ma and Tạ Văn Thông. (1998). Tiếng Bru-Vân Kiêu (The Bru-Van Kieu language). Hanoi: Nhà Xuất Bản Khoa Học Xã Hội.Find this resource:

Hockett, C. (1947). Problems of morphemic analysis. Language 23: 321–343.Find this resource:

Hockett, C. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word 10: 210–231.Find this resource:

Hockett, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Find this resource:

Hockett, C. F. (1994). Conversion: The problem of parts of speech in English. Etudes Anglaises 47(2): 171–181. (p. 828) Find this resource:

Hoffmann, B. (1777). Lateinische Sprachkunst, zum bessern Gebrauche der Jugend tabellarisch abgefasset (6 vols). Bruchsal: Hoffmann (I, VI); Frankenthal: Segel (II); Mannheim: Kurfürstl. Hofdruckerei (III); Karlsruhe: Machlott (IV, V).Find this resource:

Hoffmann, C. (1963). A Grammar of the Margi Language. London: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hofmann, D. (1961). Die k-Diminutiva im Nordfriesischen und in verwandten Sprachen. Köln: Böhlau Verlag.Find this resource:

Hohenhaus, P. (2004). Identical constituent compounding—a corpus-based study. Folia Linguistica 38: 297–331.Find this resource:

Holden, J. (2012). Benasní—I Remember. Dene Su̙ɬiné Oral Histories with Morphological Analysis. Leiden: Brill.Find this resource:

Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, Functions, and Varieties. Rev. edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Find this resource:

Holton, G. (2000). The phonology and morphology of the Tanacross Athabaskan language. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Linguistics, University of California Santa Barbara.Find this resource:

Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Horecký, J. (1964). Morfematická štruktúra slovenčiny. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied.Find this resource:

Horecký, J., Bosák, J., and Buzássyová, K. (1989). Dynamika slovnej zásoby súčasnej slovenčiny. Bratislava: Veda.Find this resource:

Horgan, D. M. (1980). Patterns of variation and interchangeability in some Old English prefixes. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen: 127–130.Find this resource:

Horvath, J., and Siloni, T. (2011). Anticausatives: against reflexivization. Lingua 121: 2176–2186.Find this resource:

Horwood, G. (2001). Anti-faithfulness and subtractive morphology. MS. Rutgers University.Find this resource:

Howard, P. (1990). A Dictionary of the Verbs of South Slavey. Yellowknife, Northwest Territories: Department of Culture and Communications, Government of the Northwest Territories.Find this resource:

Hudson, J. (1976). Walmatjari. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, 205–208.Find this resource:

Huehnergard, J. (2011, 2005). A Grammar of Akkadian. Harvard Semitic Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Semitic Museum/Eisenbrauns.Find this resource:

Huffman, F. E. (1970). Modern Spoken Cambodian. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program.Find this resource:

Huffman, F. E. (1986). Khmer loanwords in Thai. In R. J. Bickner et al. (eds), A Conference on Thai Studies In Honor of William J. Gedney. Center for South and Southeast Asian studies, the University of Michigan, 199–210.Find this resource:

Hummel, M. (2000). Adverbale und adverbialisierte Adjektive im Spanischen. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

Hupp, J. M., Sloutsky, V. M., and Culicover, P. W. (2009). Evidence for a domain-general mechanism underlying the suffixation preference in language. Language and Cognitive Processes 24: 876–909.Find this resource:

Hurch, B. (1989). Hispanisierung im Baskischen. In N. Boretzky, W. Enninger, and T. Stolz (eds), Beiträge zum 5. Essener Kolloquium überGrammatikalisierung: Natürlichkeit und Systemökonomie’. Vol. 1 (Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 7). Bochum: Brockmeyer, 11–35.Find this resource:

Hurch, B. (ed.) (2005). Studies on Reduplication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (p. 829) Find this resource:

Hurch, B. and Mattes, V. (2005). Über die Entstehung von partieller Reduplikation. In G. Fenk-Oczlon and C. Winkler (eds), Sprache und Natürlichkeit. Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler. Tübingen: Narr, 137–156.Find this resource:

Hurford, J. (1990). Nativist and functional explanations in language acquisition. In. I. M. Roca (ed.), Logical Issues in Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris, 85–136.Find this resource:

Hutchison, J. (1981). The Kanuri Language: A Reference Grammar. Madison, WI: African Studies Program.Find this resource:

Hyman, L. M. (1979). Aghem Grammatical Structure: With Special Reference to Noun Classes, Tense–Aspect and Focus Marking. Los Angeles: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Find this resource:

Hyman, L. M. (2003). Suffix ordering in Bantu: a morphocentric approach. Yearbook of Morphology 2002, 245–281.Find this resource:

Hyman, L. M. (2007). Niger-Congo verb extensions: overview and discussion. In D. L. Payne and J. Peña (eds), Selected Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 149–163.Find this resource:

Hyman, L. M. (2009). The natural history of verb stem reduplication in Bantu. Morphology 19: 177–206.Find this resource:

Iacobini, C. (2000). Base and direction of derivation. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan, in collaboration with S. Skopeteas (eds), Morphologie. Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. An international handbook on inflection and word-formation. 1. Halband. Volume 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 865–876.Find this resource:

Ibanez Moreno, A., and González Torres, E. (2006). Determining the criteria that are useful to identify the derivational and/or compositional capabilities of lexical items in Old English. <http://www.nytud.hu/cescl/proceedings/Moreno-Torres_CESCL.pdf>, accessed February 22, 2013.

Ikegami, J. (1974). Versuch einer Klassifikation der Tungussischen Sprachen. In G. Hazai and P. Zieme (eds), Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur der Altaischen Völker. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 271–272.Find this resource:

INDEC (Instituto Nacional De Estadística y Censos). (2004–2005). Encuesta Complementaria de Pueblos Indígenas. Publicación online: <http://www.indec.mecon.ar/webcenso/ecpi/index_ecpi.asp>.

Indo-Aryan Languages (2012). In Encyclopædia Britannica. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/286348/Indo-Aryan-languages> accessed June 10, 2012.

Inkelas, S. (1993). Nimboran position class morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 559–624.Find this resource:

Inkelas, S. (1998). The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: A case study of dominance effects. Yearbook of Morphology 1997: 121–155.Find this resource:

Inkelas, S. (2011). The interaction between morphology and phonology. In J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, and A. Yu (eds), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 68–102.Find this resource:

Inkelas, S. and Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: Doubling in Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Inkelas, S., Orgun, O. and Zoll, C. (1997). The implications of lexical exceptions for the nature of grammar. In I. Roca (ed.), Derivations and Constraints in Phonology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 393–418.Find this resource:

Inuit Circumpolar Council. (2010). The Use of the term Inuit in scientific and other circles. 2010. <http://inuitcircumpolar.com/section.php?ID=25andLang=EnandNav=Section>. (p. 830)

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2008). Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology 19: 640–648.Find this resource:

Ioannidis, J. P. A. and Trikalinos, T. A. (2007). An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clinical Trials 4: 245–253.Find this resource:

Jaberg, K. (1905). Review of Max Roediger. Die Bedeutung des Suffixes -ment. Diss. Berlin 1904, Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 114: 458–462.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. S. (1975). Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon. Language 51: 639–671.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. (1977). X-bar Syntax. A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. S. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. (2009). Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In R. Lieber and P. Štekauer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 105–128.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. (2010). Meaning and the Lexicon: The Parallel Architecture 1975–2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Jackson, H. and Zé Amvela, E. (2007). Words, Meaning and Vocabulary. An Introduction to Modern English Lexicology. 2nd edn. London: Continuum.Find this resource:

Jacob, J. (1968). Introduction to Cambodian. London: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds) (1970). Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Find this resource:

Jacobson, S. (1984). Yup’ik Eskimo Dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Find this resource:

Jacobson, S. (1995). A Practical Grammar of the Central Yup’ik Eskimo Language. With Yup’ik Readings written by A. W. Jacobson. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Find this resource:

Jacobsson, B. (1977). Adverbs, prepositions, and conjunctions in English: A study in gradience. Studia Linguistica 31(1): 38–64.Find this resource:

Jacques, G. (向柏霖) (2003). 嘉絨語、藏語、及上古漢語的–s後綴 Jiarongyu Zangyu ji Shanggu Hanyu de -s houzhui [The -s suffix in Rgyalrong, Tibetan, and Archaic Chinese]. Minzu Yuwen 1: 12–15.Find this resource:

Jacques, G. (2008). 嘉絨語研究 Jiarongyu Yanjiu [A Study of Rgyalrong]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Find this resource:

Jacques, G. (2010a). The origin of the reflexive prefix in Rgyalrong languages. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 73(2): 261–268.Find this resource:

Jacques, G. (2010b). A possible trace of verb agreement in Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 9(1): 41–49.Find this resource:

Jacques, G. (2012a). Argument demotion in Japhug Rgyalrong. In G. Authier and K. Haude (eds), Ergativity, Valency and Voice. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 199–225.Find this resource:

Jacques, G. (2012b). Agreement Morphology: The Case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13(1): 83–116.Find this resource:

Jacques, G. (2012c). From denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122: 1207–1231.Find this resource:

Jacques, G. (2012d). An internal reconstruction of Tibetan stem alternations. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(2): 212–224.Find this resource:

Jacques, G. (forthcoming). The genetic position of Chinese. CRNS/CRLAO. In R. Sybesma, J. Huang, W. Behr, and Z. Handel, (eds), Encyclopedia of Chinese Languages and Linguistics. (p. 831) <http://cnrs.academia.edu/GuillaumeJacques/Papers/1009403/The_genetic_position_of_Chinese> accessed August 15, 2012.

Jacques, G. (向柏霖) and Chen Zhen (2004). 茶堡話的重疊形式 Chabaohua de chongdie xingshi [Reduplicated forms in Japhug]. Minzu Yuwen 4: 7–11.Find this resource:

Jaggar, P. (2001). Hausa. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Jakobi, A., and Crass, J. (2004). Grammaire du Beria: langue saharienne. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Jakubowski, P. (2006). On derivational suffixes in three late Middle English romances: Guy of Warwick, Bevis of Hampton, and Sultan of Babylon. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An International Review of English Studies 42: 189–201.Find this resource:

Janda, L. A. (2011). Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics 22(2), 359–392.Find this resource:

Janda, L. A. and Townsend, C. E. (2000). Czech. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Janhunen, J. (ed.) (2003). The Mongolic Languages. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Janhunen, J. (2006). Mongolic languages. In K. Brown (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 231–234.Find this resource:

Janssen, N., Bi, Y., and Caramazza, A. (2008). A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(7–8): 1191–1223.Find this resource:

Jarceva, V. (ed.) (1997). Jazyki mira. Mongol’skie, tunguso-manchzhurskie jazyki, japonskij jazyk, korejskij jazyk [Languages of the world: Mongolic languages, Tungusic languages, Japanese, Korean]. Moscow: Indrik.Find this resource:

Jarmulowicz, L., Taran, V. L., and Hay, S. E. (2008). Lexical frequency and third-graders’ stress accuracy in derived English word production. Applied Psycholinguistics 29: 213–235.Find this resource:

Järvikivi, J. and Niemi, J. (2002). Allomorphs as paradigm indices: on-line experiments with Finnish free and bound stems. SKY Journal of Linguistics 15: 119–143.Find this resource:

Järvikivi, J. and Pyykkönen, P. (2011). Sub-and supralexical information in early phases of lexical access. Frontiers in psychology, 2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00282.Find this resource:

Järvikivi, J., Bertram, R., and Niemi, J. (2006). Affixal salience and the processing of derivational morphology: the role of suffix allomorphy. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(4): 394–431.Find this resource:

Jastrow, O. (2005). Uzbekistan Arabic: A language created by Semitic-Iranian-Turkic linguistic convergence. In E. A. Csató, B. Isaksson, and C. Jahani (eds), Linguistic Convergence and Areal Diffusion: Case Studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic. London: Routledge Curzon, 133–139.Find this resource:

Jeddore, R. (1976). Labrador Inuit Uqausingit. Nain: the Labrador Inuit Committee on Literacy.Find this resource:

Jelinek, E. and Demers, R. (1994). Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish. Language 70: 697–736.Find this resource:

Jelinek, E. and Escalante, F. (1988). ‘Verbless’ possessive sentences in Yaqui. In W. Shipley (ed.), In Honor of Mary Haas: Papers from the Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 411–29.Find this resource:

Jendraschek, G. (2006). Basque in contact with Romance languages. In A. Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–162.Find this resource:

Jenkins, R. S. (2002). Language Contact and Composite Structures in New Ireland, Papua New Guinea. Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Services.Find this resource:

Jenner, P. and Saverous Pou (1982). A lexicon of Khmer morphology. Mon-Khmer Studies 9–10: 1–517.Find this resource:

Jenny, M. (2003). New infixes in Spoken Mon. Mon-Khmer Studies 33: 183–194. (p. 832) Find this resource:

Jenny, M. (2005). The verb system of Mon. Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 19. University of Zurich.Find this resource:

Jensen, J. T. (1990). Morphology. Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Jescheniak, J. D. and Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20(4): 824–843.Find this resource:

Jespersen, O. (1942). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI: Morphology. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.Find this resource:

Jetté, J. and Jones, E. (2000). Koyukon Dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Find this resource:

Ježek, E. and Melloni, C. (2011). Nominals, polysemy and co-predication. MS. University of Pavia and University of Verona.Find this resource:

Ji, H., Gagné, C. and Spalding, T. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 65: 406–430.Find this resource:

Jin, P., Tan K., Qu A., Lin X. (1958). 嘉戎語梭磨話的語音及形態(續) Jiarongyu Suomohua de yuyin ji xingtai (xu) [Phonology and morphology in Suomo Rgyalrong, Part II], Yuyan Yanjiu 3: 71–108.Find this resource:

Joanisse, M. F. and Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96: 7592–7597.Find this resource:

Johanson, L. (1992). Strukturelle Faktoren in türkischen Sprachkontakten. In Sitzungsberichte der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, vol. 29(5). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 169–299Find this resource:

Johanson, L. (2002a). Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts. London: Curzon.Find this resource:

Johanson, L. (2002b). Contact-induced linguistic change in a code-copying framework. In Jones, M. C. and E. Esch (eds), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-Linguistic Factors. (Contributions to the Sociology of Language, 86). Berlin: Mouton: de Gruyter, 285–313.Find this resource:

Johanson, L. and Csató, Á. (1998). The Turkic Languages. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Johns, A. (1992). Deriving ergativity. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 57–88.Find this resource:

Johns, A. (1999). On the lexical semantics of affixal meaning ‘want’ in Inuktitut. International Journal of American Linguistics 65(2): 176–200.Find this resource:

Johns, A. (2007). Restricting noun incorporation: root movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 535–576.Find this resource:

Johns, A. (2009). Additional facts about noun incorporation (in Inuktitut). Lingua 119(2): 185–198.Find this resource:

Johns, A. (2010). Word internal nominalization in Inuktitut. Paper delivered at the LSA in Baltimore.Find this resource:

Jones, B. (2011). A Grammar of Wangkajunga: A Language of the Great Sandy Desert of North Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Jong, F. de. (2007). A Grammar of Modern Uyghur. Utrecht: Houtsma.Find this resource:

Jungraithmayr, H. (1963). Die Sprache der Sura (Mwaghavul) in Nordnigerien. Afrika und Übersee 47: 8–89.Find this resource:

Jungraithmayr, H. (1990). Lexique Mokilko. Berlin: Reimer.Find this resource:

Jungraithmayr, H. and Adams, A. (1992). Lexique Migama. Berlin: Reimer. (p. 833) Find this resource:

Jurafsky, D. (1993). Universals in the semantics of the diminutive, Parasession on semantic typology and semantic universals. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 19(1): 423–436.Find this resource:

Jurafsky, D. (1996). Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3): 533–578.Find this resource:

Kachru, Y. (2006). Hindi. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Kačmárová, A. (2010). A Short Survey of Diminutives in Slovak and English, English Matters, Prešov: PU. 17–21. Retrieved from <http://www.pulib.sk/elpub2/FHPV/Kacmarova1/index.html>.Find this resource:

Kadazan Dusun Cultural Association (1995). Kadazan Dusun-Malay-English Dictionary. Kota Kinabalu: Sabah.Find this resource:

Kamp, H. and Rossdeutscher, A. (1994). Remarks on lexical structure and DRS construction. Theoretical Linguistics 20: 97–164.Find this resource:

Kandel, S., Spinelli, E., Tremblay, A., Guerassimovitch, H., and Álvarez, C. J. (2012). Processing prefixes and suffixes in handwriting production. Acta psychologica 140(3): 187–195.Find this resource:

Kangasmaa-Minn, E. (1987). Functional derivation in Finno-Ugric. In Papers on Derivation in Uralic. Szegeder und Turkuer Beiträge zur uralischen Derivation. Szeged: Univ. Szeged de Attila József Nominata, 5–27.Find this resource:

Kangasmaa-Minn, E. (1992). Pienimuotoinen kieliperimämme [English summary: Our unobtrusive linguistic inheritance]. Sananjalka 34: 21–31.Find this resource:

Kaper, W. (1959). Kindersprachforschung mit Hilfe des Kindes. Groningen: Wolters.Find this resource:

Kaplan, L. (1981). Phonological Issues in North Alaskan Inupiaq. Alaska Native Language Center research papers, no. 6. Fairbanks, Alaska (Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska, Fairbanks 99701): Alaska Native Language Center.Find this resource:

Kari, J. (1979). Athabaskan Verb Theme Categories: Ahtna. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Find this resource:

Kari, J. (1989). Affix positions and zones in the Athapaskan verb complex: Ahtna and Navajo. International Journal of American Linguistics 55: 424–454.Find this resource:

Kari, J. (1990). Ahtna Athabaskan Dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Find this resource:

Kari, J. (1992). Some concepts in Ahtna Athabaskan word formation. In M. Aronoff (ed.), Morphology Now, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 107–131.Find this resource:

Karmanova, A. N. (2002), Torjakyvjas tečasnog da artmannog. [Structure and formation of words]. Syktyvkar: Syktyvkarskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.Find this resource:

Karnchana, N. (1978). The syllabic and morphological structure of Cambodian words. Mon-Khmer Studies 7: 183–200.Find this resource:

Kasik, R. (1997). Typology of Estonian and Finnish word-formation: the verb. In M. Erelt (ed.), Estonian. Typological Studies II. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 43–72.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1969). Wortbildung und Nullmorphem. Linguistische Berichte 2: 1–13.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1980). Zero in morphology: a means of making up for phonological losses? In J. Fisiak (eds), Historical Morphology. The Hague: Mouton, 213–250.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1982). Wortbildung und Semantik. Tübingen/Düsseldorf: Francke/Bagel.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1986). Productivity in word formation. Linguistics 24: 585–600.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1992a). The formats change—the problems remain: word-formation theory between 1960 and 1990. In M. Pütz (ed.), Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution. Studies in Honour of René Dirven on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 28–310. (p. 834) Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1992b). Semantics and Vocabulary. In R. M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 290–408.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1994). Verbal derivation in English: A historical survey or Much Ado about Nothing. In D. Britton (ed.), English Historical Linguistics 1994. Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 93–117.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1996). The place of word-formation in grammar. In K. R. Jankowsky (ed.), Multiple Perspectives on the Historical Dimensions of Language. Münster: Nodus, 227–243.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (1997). Sign-oriented vs. form-oriented linguistics and word-formation. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia XXXI: 79–90.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (2000). Words and word-formation: morphology in OED. In L. Mugglestone (ed.), Lexicography and the OED. Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 110–125.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (2002). The derivation of ornative, locative, ablative, privative and reversative verbs in English: a historical sketch. In T. Fanego, M. J. López-Couso, and J. Pérez-Guerra (eds), English Historical Syntax and Morphology (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory: 223). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 99–109.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (2005). Conversion and/or zero: word-formation theory, historical linguistics and typology. In L. Bauer and S. Valera (eds), Approaches to Conversion/Zero-derivation. Münster: Waxmann, 31–49.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (2006a). Historical morphology from a typological point of view: examples from English. In T. Nevalainen, J. Klemola, and M. Laitinen (eds), Types of Variation: Diachronic, Dialectal and Typological Interfaces. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 53–80.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (2006b). Morphology as word-formation in the 20th-century linguistics: a survey. In S. Auroux, H.-J. Koerner, and K. V. Niederehe (eds), History of the Language Sciences. An International Handbook on the evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginnings to the Present. vol. 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (2006c). Typological changes in derivational morphology. In A. van Kemenade and B. Los (eds), The Handbook of the History of English. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 151–176.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (2010). Translation techniques in the terminology of Ælfric’s Grammar: semantic loans, loan translations and word-formation. In M. Kytö et al. (eds), Language Change and Variation from Old English to Late Modern English (Linguistic Insights: Studies in Language and Communication: 114). Bern: Peter Lang, 163–174.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (2012). Morphology. In A. Bergs and L. Brinton. English Historical Linguistics, Vol. I, Part II, 129–148. [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 34.1].Find this resource:

Kastovsky, D. (2013). A Historical Morphology of English. Edinburgh textbooks on the English language—advanced. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Kaufman, D. (2003). Paradigm effects and the affix-shape/position generalization. In G. Garding and M. Tsujimura, (eds), WCCFL 22 Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 273–286.Find this resource:

Kaufman, D. (2009). Austronesian nominalism and its consequences: a Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics 35: 1–49.Find this resource:

Kaufman, T. (1974a). Meso-American Indian languages. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th edn, ed. by P.W. Goetz, 11. Chicago, 956–63.Find this resource:

Kaufman, T. (1974b). Idiomas de Mesoamerica (Seminario de Integracion Social Guatemalteca, publicacion no. 33). Guatemala: J. de Pineda Ibarra. (p. 835) Find this resource:

Kaufman, T. (1990). Language history in South America: What we know and how to know more. In D. Payne (ed.), Amazonian Linguistics. Studies in Lowland South American Languages. Austin: University of Texas, 13–73.Find this resource:

Kaunisto, M. (2001). Nobility in the history of adjectives ending in -ic and -ical. Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States Forum 27: 35–45.Find this resource:

Kaunisto, M. (2004). Adjective Pairs ending in -ic and -ical: A study of variation and change across centuries. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section C: Worldwide 65(3): 585.Find this resource:

Kay, P. and Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the what’s X doing Y? Construction. Language 1–33.Find this resource:

Kaye, A. S. (ed.). (2007). Morphologies of Asia and Africa, vol. 1. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.Find this resource:

Kazanina, N. (2011). Decomposition of prefixed words in Russian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37(6): 1371.Find this resource:

Kečkéšová, V. (2012). Sound symbolism and second language acquisition. MA thesis. P. J. Šafárik University, Košice.Find this resource:

Keegan, J. M. (1997). A Reference Grammar of Mbay. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Find this resource:

Kemmer, S. (1992). Grammatical prototypes and competing motivations in a theory of linguistic change. In G. W. Davis and G. K. Iverson (eds), Explanation in Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 145–166.Find this resource:

Kempe, V. and Brooks, P. J. (2001). The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Russian gender: Can elements of child-directed speech aid in learning morphology? Language Learning 51: 221–256.Find this resource:

Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., Mironova, N., and Fedorova, O. (2003). Diminutivization supports gender acquisition in Rusisan children. Journal of Child Language 30: 471–485.Find this resource:

Kemps, R., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2004). Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain and Language 19: 117–127.Find this resource:

Kemps, R., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2005a). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: the case of Dutch noun plurals. Memory and Cognition 33: 430–446.Find this resource:

Kemps, R., Wurm, L. H., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2005b). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity in Dutch and English. Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 43–73.Find this resource:

Kennedy, C. and McNally, L. (2005). Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381.Find this resource:

Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Kerleroux, F. (1999). Identification d’un procédé morphologique. La conversion. Faits de Langues: Revue de Linguistique 14: 89–100.Find this resource:

Kernan, K. T. and Blount, B. G. (1966). The acquisition of Spanish grammar by Mexican children. Anthropological Linguistics 8: 1–14.Find this resource:

Kertz, L. (2006). Evaluative adjectives: an adjunct control analysis. In D. Baumer, D. Montero, and M. Scanlon (eds), WCCFL 28 Proceedings. Somerville, Cascadilla Press, 229–235.Find this resource:

Keszler, B. (2006). Magyar Grammatika. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.Find this resource:

Keuleers, E. and Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods 42(3): 627–633.Find this resource:

Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., and Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: a lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono-and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174. (p. 836) Find this resource:

Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., and Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods 44(1): 287–304.Find this resource:

Keune, K., Ernestus, M., Van Hout, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2005). Social, geographical, and register variation in Dutch: From written ‘mogelijk’ to spoken ‘mok’. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 183–223.Find this resource:

Keune, K., van Hout, R., and Baayen, R. H. (2006). Socio-geographic variation in morphological productivity in spoken Dutch: a comparison of statistical techniques. In J.-M. Viprey (ed.), Actes des 8es journées internationales d’analyse statistique des données textuelles, vol. 2, Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, 571–580.Find this resource:

Keune, K., van Hout, R. and Baayen, R. H. Derivational and lexical productivity across written and spoken Dutch. Manuscript.Find this resource:

Key, H. (1965). Some semantic functions of reduplication in various languages. Anthropological Linguistics 7: 88–101.Find this resource:

Keyser, S. J. and Roeper, T. (1984). On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381–416.Find this resource:

Kibrik, A. (1995/2005). Inflection vs. derivation and the template for Athabaskan verb morphology. Manuscript.Find this resource:

Kibrik, A. (2012). Toward a typology of verbal lexical systems: A case study in Northern Athabaskan. Linguistics, 50(3): 495–532.Find this resource:

Kiefer, F. (2003). Alaktan [Morphology]. In K. É. Kiss, F. Kiefer and P. Siptár (eds), Új magyar nyelvtan [New Hungarian Grammar]. Budapest: Osiris, 189–284.Find this resource:

Kiefer, F. (2010). Areal-typological aspects of word-formation: the case of aktionsart-formation in German, Hungarian, Slavic, Baltic, Romani and Yiddish. In F. Rainer, W. U. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, and H. C. Luschützky (eds), Variation and Change in Morphology. Selected Papers from the International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2008. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 129–147.Find this resource:

Kiefer, F. (forthcoming). Hungarian. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, and F. Rainer (eds), Word-Formation. An International Handbook of Languages in Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Find this resource:

Kilham, C., Pamulkan, M., Pootchemunka, J., and Wolmby, T. (1986). Dictionary and Source Book of the Wik-Mungkan language. Darwin: SIL-AAB.Find this resource:

Kimball, G. D. (1991). Koasati Grammar. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Find this resource:

Kimenyi, A. (2002). A Tonal Grammar of Kinyarwanda: An Autosegmental and Metrical Analysis. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.Find this resource:

Kimura, D. (2000). Sex and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Find this resource:

King, K. and Melzi, G. (2004). Intimacy, imitation and language learning: Spanish diminutives in mother-child conversation. First Language 24: 241–261.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. (1982a). Word-formation and the lexicon. In F. Ingemann (ed.), 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers. Lawrence, Kansas: Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas, 1–29.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. (1982b). Lexical morphology and phonology. In I. S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, 1–91.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. (1982c). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds), The Structure of Phonological Representation. Volume 1. Dordrecht: Foris, 131–176.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. (1986). The phonology of reduplication. Unpublished MS., Stanford University. (p. 837) Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. (1996). Allomorphy or morphophonology? In R. Singh (ed.), Trubetzkoy’s Orphan: Proceedings of the Montreal Roundtable ‘Morphophonology: Contemporary Responses’. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 13–31.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. (1997). Remarks on denominal verbs. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, and P. Sells (eds), Argument Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 473–499.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. (2001). Structural case in Finnish. Lingua 111: 315–376.Find this resource:

Kiyomi, S. (1995). A new approach to reduplication: a semantic study of noun and verb reduplication in the Malayo-Polynesian languages. Linguistics 33: 1145–1167.Find this resource:

Klamer, M. (1998). A grammar of Kambera. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Kleiber, G. (2010). Petit essai pour montrer que la polysémie n’est pas un…sens interdit, Cahiers de lexicologie 96: 129–149.Find this resource:

Klein, D. E. and Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language 45: 259–282.Find this resource:

Kleinschmidt, S. (1851). Grammatik der Grönländischen Sprache. Reprinted 1968. Berlin: George Olms.Find this resource:

Klembárová, E. (2012). Contrastive Analysis of Word-Formation in Children of Different Age. MA thesis. P. J. Šafárik University, Košice.Find this resource:

Kliegl,