Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 18 January 2021

Abstract and Keywords

Quantitative empirical studies into accountability are scarce. Much of the available literature provides definitions, typologies, theoretical models, or case studies, but research that compares findings on the basis of a fixed set of indicators is to a great degree still lacking. This chapter provides building blocks for cumulative quantitative research into accountability. It does so by navigating through the variety of indicators used in existing quantitative accountability research, and demonstrates which indicators are relevant for which particular classes of research questions. Although singular, unbiased and unambiguous indicators for accountability regrettably do not exist, existing research does offer helpful clues as to specifying what particular aspects of accountability can be in focus, and how these can be gauged.

Keywords: Accountability, Transparency, Good Governance, Public Administration, Political Science

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.