Abstract and Keywords
This article addresses the debate over whether the representational content of perceptual experience is, at least in part, nonconceptual. Conceptualists claim that how a creature’s experiences represent the world is constrained by the concepts it possesses. Nonconceptualists contend that it is possible for a creature’s experiences to represent the world in a way that is not limited by its conceptual capacities. Arguments for and against both positions are set out, with philosophical and empirical considerations taken into account. Among the issues examined are the Myth of the Given, direct perception, demonstrative reference, attention, memory, and cognitive encapsulation. The primary goal is to shed light on the motivations for and challenges facing both conceptualism and nonconceptualism. A secondary goal is to show that each side has to grant significant concessions to the other. Ultimately, it is unclear whether either conceptualism or nonconceptualism could emerge as a clear-cut victor in the debate.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.