Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 14 November 2019

Abstract and Keywords

We frequently need to model orthogonal information; for instance, number typically cross-cuts lexical meaning. The normal way of doing this is by using features (NUMBER in this instance). Looking specifically at inflection, the key determinants are the morphosyntactic features (like NUMBER) and the morphosemantic features (like TENSE). These provide the specification which inflectional morphology realizes. In addition we find the purely morphological features which express inflectional class. Interesting situations arise when the morphological forms available do not match the morphosyntactic and morphosemantic requirements in a straightforward way. This is where we find phenomena such as syncretism, defectiveness, and deponency. In some challenging examples the mismatch appears particularly severe, which raises the possibility that we should allow for less direct mapping of morphosyntactic specifications onto morphological paradigms.

Keywords: morphosyntactic features, morphological features, syncretism, inflectional paradigm, inflectional class, Network Morphology, default inheritance, Russian, Latvian

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.