Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 17 November 2019

(p. 597) References

(p. 597) References

Aarsland, D., R. Perry, A. Brown, J. P. Larsen, and C. Ballard (2005). Neuropathology of dementia in Parkinson’s disease: A prospective, community-based study. Annals of Neurology, 58(5): 773–76.Find this resource:

Abbot-Smith, Kirsten and Heike Behrens (2006). How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: the German passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science 30: 995–1026.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Farrell and Robert Malouf (2013). Morphological organization: the low entropy conjecture. Language 89(3): 429–64.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Farrell and Gregory T. Stump (eds) (2005). Paradigms and periphrastic expression: a study in realization-based lexicalism. In Louisa Sadler and Andrew Spencer (eds), Projecting Morphology, pp. 111–58. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Farrell and Gert Webelhuth (1998). A Theory of Predicates. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins, and Robert Malouf (2009). Parts and wholes: implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In James P. Blevins and Juliet Blevins (eds), Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, pp. 54–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Farrell, Gregory T. Stump, and Gert Webelhuth (2011). Lexicalism, periphrasis, and implicative morphology. In R. D. Borsley and K. Börjars (eds), Non-transformational Syntax: Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar, pp. 325–58. Oxford:Wiley Blackwell.Find this resource:

Adelaar, Willem. F. H. (2006). The Quechua impact in Amuesha. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic Typology, pp. 290–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Adelaar, Willem F. H. with Pieter Muysken (2004). The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Adger, David, Susana Béjar, and Daniel Harbour (2003). Directionality of allomorphy: a reply to Carstairs-McCarthy. Transactions of the Philological Society, 101(1): 109–15.Find this resource:

Aguado-Orea, Javier (2004). The acquisition of morpho-syntax in Spanish: implications for current theories of development. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.Find this resource:

Aguado-Orea, Javier and Julian M. Pine (2002). There is no evidence for a ‘no overt subject’ stage in early child Spanish: a note on Grinstead (2000). Journal of child Language 29: 865–74.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2000). Classifiers: A Typology of Noun categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2002). Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2003). Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: new morphology and language contact. Journal of Linguistics, 39(1): 1–29. (p. 598) Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Grammars in contact: a cross-linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic Typology, pp. 1–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and R. M. W. Dixon (eds) (2001). Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and R. M. W. Dixon (2010). Handout: Areal features and regional traits. Talk given at the University of Leiden LUcL.Find this resource:

Aitchison, Jean (2003). Psycholinguistic perspectives on language change. In Brian D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, pp. 736–43. London: Blackwell Publishers.Find this resource:

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi (1996). Featural affixation. Journal of Linguistics, 32: 239–89.Find this resource:

Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. (1988). The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. and Dan I. Slobin (1985). The acquisition of Turkish. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 1, pp. 839–78. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Alber, Birgit and Sabine Arndt-Lappe (2012). Templatic and subtractive truncation. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Albin, R. L. (2006). Neurobiology of basal ganglia and Tourette syndrome: striatal and dopamine function. Advances in Neurology, 99: 99–106.Find this resource:

Albin, R. L. and J.W. Mink (2006). Recent advances in Tourette syndrome research. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(3): 175–83.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. (2002). The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. PhD thesis, UcLA.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. (2003). A quantitative study of Spanish paradigm gaps. In Gina Garding and Mimu Tsujimura (eds), Proceedings of the West coast conference on Formal Linguistics, 22: 1–14. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. (2005). The morphological basis of paradigm leveling. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen (eds), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, pp. 17–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. (2008). Inflectional paradigms have bases too: evidence from Yiddish. In Asaf Bachrach and Andrew Nevins (eds), Inflectional Identity, pp. 271–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. (2009). Lexical and morphological conditioning of paradigm gaps. In C. Rice and S. Blaho (eds), Modeling Ungrammaticality in Optimality Theory, pp. 117–64. London: Equinox.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. (2010). Base-driven leveling in Yiddish verb paradigms. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28: 475–537.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. (2011). Paradigms. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice (eds), The Blackwell companion to Phonology, vol. 4, 1972–2001. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. and Bruce Hayes (2002). Modeling English past tense intuitions with minimal generalization. In Mike Maxwell (ed.), Proceedings of the 2002 Workshop on Morphological Learning, Philadelphia. Association of Computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. and Bruce Hayes (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational experimental study. Cognition, 90(2): 119–61. (p. 599) Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. and Bruce Hayes (2006). Modeling productivity with the gradual learning algorithm: the problem of accidentally exceptionless generalizations. In Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Fery, Matthias Schlesewsky, and Ralf Vogel (eds), Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives, pp. 185–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Albright, Adam C. and Bruce Hayes (2011). Learning and learnability in phonology. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan C. L. Yu (eds), Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edn, pp. 661–90. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Alderete, John (1999). Morphologically governed accent in Optimality Theory. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Find this resource:

Alderete, John (2001). Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology, 18: 201–53.Find this resource:

Alderete, John, Jill Beckman, Laura Benua, Amalia Gnanadesikan, John McCarthy, and Suzanne Urbanczyk (1999). Reduplication with fixed segmentism. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(3): 327–64.Find this resource:

Alegre, Maria and Peter Gordon (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40: 41–61.Find this resource:

Alfonseca, Enrique, Slaven Bilac, and Stefan Pharies (2008). German decompounding in a difficult corpus. In Proceedings of the 9th International conference on computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, CICLing 08, pp. 128–39. Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.Find this resource:

Allen, Shanley E. M. and Martha B. Crago (1996). Early passive acquisition in Inuktitut. Journal of child Language, 1: 129–55.Find this resource:

ALPAC (1966). Language and machines: Computers in translation and linguistics. Technical report, Automatic Language Processing Advisory committee.Find this resource:

Alpher, Barry (2004). Pama-Nyungan: phonological reconstruction and status as a phyloge-netic group. In Claire Bowern and Harold Koch (eds), Australian Languages: Classification and the comparative Method, pp. 105–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Amaral, D. G., C. M. Schumann, and C.W. Nordahl (2008). Neuroanatomy of autism. Trends in Neurosciences, 31(3): 137–45.Find this resource:

Amberber, Mengistu, Brett Baker, and Mark Harvey (2007). Complex predication and the coverb construction. In Jeffrey Siegel, Jeffrey Lynch, and Diana Eades (eds), Language Description, History and Development: Linguistic Indulgence in Memory of Terry crowley, pp. 209–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Ambridge, Ben and Elena V. M. Lieven (2011). Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Andersen, Henning (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Language, 49(4): 765–93.Find this resource:

Andersen, Henning (ed.) (2001). Actualization: Linguistic change in Progress, vol. 219, cILT. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Andersen, Torben (1987). The phonemic system of Agar Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 9: 1–27.Find this resource:

Andersen, Torben (1990). Vowel length in Western Nilotic languages. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 2: 5–26.Find this resource:

Andersen, Torben (1992–94). Morphological stratification in Dinka: on the alternations of voice quality, vowel length and tone in the morphology of transitive verbal roots in a monosyllabic language. Studies in African Linguistics, 23: 1–63.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1976). On the description of consonant gradation in Fula. Studies in African Linguistics, 7: 93–136. (p. 600) Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1982a). The analysis of French shwa, or how to get something for nothing. Language, 58: 534–73.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1982b). Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry, 13: 571–612.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1985). Phonology in the Twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1986). Disjunctive ordering in inflectional morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4: 1–32.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1988). Morphological change. In Fritz Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. 1, pp. 324–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1990). The grammar of Icelandic verbs in st. In Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds), Icelandic Syntax, vol. 24, Syntax and Semantics, pp. 235–73. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (2001). On some issues of morphological exponence. Yearbook of Morphology 2001: 1–18.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (2004). Morphological universals and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology 2004: 1–17.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (2005). Aspects of the Theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (2008). The logical structure of linguistic theory. Language, 84: 795–814.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (2011). Stress-conditioned allomorphy in Surmiran (Rumantsch). In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach, and Marc-Oliver Hinzelin (eds), Morphological Autonomy; Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, ch. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Andrade, M. J. (1933). Quileute. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages, vol. 3, pp. 149–292. Glückstadt: J.J. Augustin.Find this resource:

Angluin, Dana (1980). Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data. Information and control, 45(2):117–35.Find this resource:

Angrilli, A., C. Spironelli, T. Elbert, T. J. Crow, G. Marano, and L. Stegagno (2009). Schizophrenia as failure of left hemispheric dominance for the phonological component of language. PLoS ONE, 4(2): e4507.Find this resource:

Antinucci, Francesco and Ruth Miller (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of child Language, 3: 167–89.Find this resource:

Anttila, Arto (2002). Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20: 1–42.Find this resource:

Anttila, Raimo (2003). Analogy: the warp and woof of cognition. In Brian D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, pp. 426–39. London: Blackwell Publishers.Find this resource:

APA (1994). Diagnostic Manual and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV, 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Find this resource:

Apresjan, Jurij, Igor Boguslavsky, Leonid Iomdin, Alexander Lazursky, Vladimir Sannikov, Victor Sizov, and Leonis Tsinman (2003). ETAP-3 Linguistic Processor: a Full-Fledged NLP Implementation of the MTT. In MTT 2003. First International conference on Meaning-Text Theory, pp. 279–88. Paris: Ecole Normale Superieure.Find this resource:

Ard, Josh (1979). A comparative and historical study of locative-based periphrastic verbal forms in Fula dialects. Studies in African Linguistics, 10(2): 119–58. (p. 601) Find this resource:

Arka, I. Wayan (2011). Constructive number systems in Marori and beyond. In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds), Proceedings of the LFG11 conference, pp. 5–25. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Arkadiev, Peter (2008). Lietuvių kalbos pirminių veiksmažodžių klasių semantika tipologinių duomenų kontekste [The semantics of Lithuanian primary verb classes in a typological context]. Acta Linguistica Lithuanica, 59: 1–27.Find this resource:

Arkadiev, Peter (2010). Notes on the Lithuanian restrictive. Baltic Linguistics, 1: 9–49.Find this resource:

Arkadiev, Peter (2011a). On the aspectual use of the prefix be- in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics, 2: 35–76.Find this resource:

Arkadiev, Peter (2011b). Aspect and actionality in Lithuanian on a typological background. In D. Petit, Cl. Le Feuvre, and H. Menantaud (eds), Langues baltiques, langues slaves, pp. 57–86. Paris: Éditions CNRS.Find this resource:

Arnold, S. E., B. T. Hyman, J. Flory, A. R. Damasio, and G. W. V. Hoesen (1991). The topographical and neuroanatomical distribution of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in the cerebral cortex of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 103–16.Find this resource:

Arnott, DavidW. (1970). The Nominal and Verbal Systems of Fula. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Aronoff, Mark (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Aronoff, Mark (1994). Morphology by Itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Aronoff, Mark and Kirsten Fudeman (2010). What is Morphology? 2nd edn. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Find this resource:

Aronson, Howard I. (1982). Georgian: A Reading Grammar. Columbus, OH: Slavica.Find this resource:

Asbury, Anna (2008). The Morphosyntax of case and Adpositions, vol. 180 of LOT Dissertation Series. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Austin, Peter and Joan Bresnan (1996) Non-configurationality in Australian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14: 215–68.Find this resource:

Avramides, Eleftherios and Philipp Koehn (2008). Enriching morphologically poor languages for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of AcL-08: HLT, pp. 763–70. Columbus, OH. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Ayres, Mary Clifton (1983). This side, that side: locality and exogamous group definition in Morehead area, Southwestern Papua. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald and Robert Schreuder (1968). War and peace: morphemes and full forms in a noninteractive activation parallel dual-route model. Brain and Language, 68: 27–32.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald, Ton Dijkstra, and Robert Schreuder (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1): 94–117.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald, James McQueen, Ton Dijkstra, and Robert Schreuder (2003). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In R. Harald Baayen and Robert Schreuder (eds), Morphological Structure in Language Processing, pp. 355–90. Berlin: Mouton.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew (2006). Tübatulabal. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown, and Andrew Hippisley (eds.), The Surrey deponency databases. <http://www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/deponency/Examples/Tubatulabal.htm>, last accessed 14 October 2011.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew (2007a). Morphological reversals. Journal of Linguistics, 43: 33–61.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew (2007b). Morphological typology of deponency. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown, and Andrew Hippisley (eds), (p. 602) Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, pp. 1–19. Oxford: The British Academy and Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew (2008). Historical observations on defectiveness: the first singular non-past. Russian Linguistics, 32: 81–97.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew (2011). Defectiveness and homophony avoidance. Journal of Linguistics, 47(1): 1–29.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew (2012). Paradigmatic chaos in Nuer. Language, 88: 467–94.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew and Dunstan Brown (2005a). Case syncretism. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds), World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 118–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew and Dunstan Brown (2005b). Verbal person/number syncretism. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds), World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 122–5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew and Greville G. Corbett (2010). Introduction. Defectiveness: typology and diachrony. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, and Dunstan Brown (eds), Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us, pp. 1–18. Oxford: The British Academy and Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown, and Greville G. Corbett (2005). The Syntax–Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew, Greville G. Corbett, Andrew Hippisley, and Dunstan Brown (eds) (2007). Deponency and Morphological Mismatches. Oxford: The British Academy and Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baerman, Matthew, Greville G. Corbett, and Dunstan Brown (eds) (2010). Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us. Oxford: The British Academy and Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Kathryn, Michael Bloodgood, Bonnie J. Dorr, Chris callison-Burch, Nathaniel W. Filardo, Christine Piatko, Lori Levin, and Scott Miller (2012). Modality and negation in SIMT use of modality and negation in semantically-informed syntactic MT. Computational Linguistics, 38(2): 411–38.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Bakker, Peter. (1997). A Language of Our Own: The Genesis of Michif, the Mixed cree-French Language of the canadian Métis. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baković, Eric (2007). A revised typology of opaque generalisations. Phonology, 24: 217–59.Find this resource:

Banerjee, Satanjeev (2005). METEOR: an automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for MT and/or Summarization at the 43th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL-2005), pp. 65–72. Ann Arbor, MI.Find this resource:

Bannard, Colin and Chris Callinson-Burch (2005). Paraphrasing with bilingual parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for computational Linguistics, AcL ‘05, pp. 597–604, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Barbarotto, R., Capitini, E., and Laiacona, M. (1996). Naming deficit in herpes simplex encephalitis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavia, 93(4): 272–80.Find this resource:

Barcinas, Jesus C. (1974). Umepanglao. Agana, Guam: Government of Guam, Department of Education. (p. 603) Find this resource:

Bartolucci, G. and R. J. Albers (1974). Deictic categories in the language of autistic children. Journal of Autism and childhood Schizophrenia, 4(2): 131–41.Find this resource:

Bates, Elizabeth, Virginia A. Marchman, Donna Thal, Larry Fenson, Philip Dale, Steven J. Reznick, Judy Reilly, and Jeff Hartung (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of child Language, 21: 85–123.Find this resource:

Bates, Elizabeth, Philip S. Dale, and Donna Thal (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In P. Fletcher and B. MacWhinney (eds), Handbook of child Language, pp. 96–151. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Find this resource:

Baudouin de courtenay, Jan (1985 [1972])]. An attempt at a theory of phonetic alternations. In Edward Stankiewicz (ed.), A Baudouin de courtenay anthology, pp. 144–212. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Find this resource:

Bavin, Edith and Sabine Stoll S. (eds) (2013). The Acquisition of Ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bazell, C. E. (1952). The correspondence fallacy in structural linguistics. Studies by Members of the English Department, Istanbul University, 3: 1–41.Find this resource:

Beckman, Jill N. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and shona vowel harmony. Phonology, 14: 1–46.Find this resource:

Beesley, Kenneth R. and Lauri Karttunen (2003). Finite State Morphology. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Find this resource:

Behrens, Heike (2002). Learning multiple regularities: evidence from overgeneralization errors in the German plural. In Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez, and Aimee Johansen (eds), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University conference on Language Development, pp. 61–71. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Behrens, Heike (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47: 383–411.Find this resource:

Bellugi, U., P. P. Wang, and T. L. Jernigan (1994). Williams Syndrome: an unusual neu-ropsychological profile. In S. H. Broman and J. Grafman (eds), Atypical cognitive Deficits in Developmental Disorders: Implications for Brain Functions, pp. 24–56. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Ben Shalom, D. (2003). Memory in autism: review and synthesis. Cortex, 39(4–5): 1129–38.Find this resource:

Bennett, Winfield S. and Jonathan Slocum (1985). An evaluation of METAL: The LRc machine translation system. Computational. Linguistics, 11: 111–21.Find this resource:

Bennetto, L., B. F. Pennington, and S. J. Rogers (1996). Intact and impaired memory functions in autism. Child Development, 67(4): 1816–35.Find this resource:

Bentein, Klaas (2011). Ancient Greek and the category of verbal periphrasis. In Marios Andreou, Metin Bagriacik, Ourania Karachaliou, Athanasios Karasimos, Athanasios and Maria Koliopoulou (eds), Proceedings of the 2nd Patras International Graduate Students conference in Linguistics. Patras: University of Patras.Find this resource:

Benua, Laura (1995). Identity effects in morphological truncation. In Jill Beckman, Suzanne Urbanczyk, and Laura Walsh Dickey (eds), Papers in Optimality Theory (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18), pp. 77–136. Boston: University of Massachusetts.Find this resource:

Benua, Laura (1997). Transderivational identity: phonological relations between words. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Berardelli, A., J. C. Rothwell, P. D. Thompson, and M. Hallett (2001). Pathophysiology of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 124(11): 2132–46.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80: 290–311. (p. 604) Find this resource:

Bergsland, Knut (1997). Aleut grammar. Unangam tunuganaan achinaasix^. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Find this resource:

Berko Gleason, Jean (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14: 150–77.Find this resource:

Berman, Ruth A. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 1, pp. 255–371. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2003). The acquisition of phonological opacity. In Jennifer Spenader, Anders Eriksson, and Östen Dahl (eds), Variation Within Optimality Theory: Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on ‘Variation within Optimality Theory’, pp. 25–36. Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.Find this resource:

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2011). In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice (eds), The Blackwell companion to Phonology, vol. 4, pp. 2019–48. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2012). The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, pp. 8–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo and April McMahon (2006). English phonology and morphology. In Bas Aarts and April M. McMahon (eds), The Handbook of English Linguistics, pp. 382–410. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bertoldi, Nicola and Marcello Federico (2009). Domain adaptation for statistical machine translation with monolingual resources. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 182–9, Athens, Greece. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bezzenberger, Adalbert (1877). Beiträge zur Geschichte der litauischen Sprache auf Grund litauischer Texte des XVI. und XVII. Jahrhunderts. Göttingen: Robert Peppmüller.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2004). Hidden syntax in Belhare. In Anju Saxena (ed.), Himalayan Languages: Past and Present: pp. 141–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar (2007). Typology in the 21st century: major current developments. Linguistic Typology, 11: 239–51.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar and Johanna Nichols. (2005). Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, pp. 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar and Johanna Nichols. (2007). Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 2nd edn, vol. 3, pp. 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Biggs, Bruce (1961). The structure of New Zealand Maaori. Anthropological Linguistics, 3(3): 1–53.Find this resource:

Biggs, Bruce (1963). A non-phonemic central vowel type in Karam, a ‘Pygmy’ language of the Schrader mountains, central New Guinea. Anthropological Linguistics, 5: 13–17.Find this resource:

Bilmes, Jeff A. and Katrin Kirchhoff (2003). Factored language models and generalized parallel backoff. In NAAcL ‘03: Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the North American chapter of the Association for computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, pp. 4–6, Morristown, NJ. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Birch, Alexandra, Miles Osborne, and Philipp Koehn (2007). CCG Supertags in Factored Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 9–16, Prague, Czech Republic. Association for computational Linguistics. (p. 605) Find this resource:

Birch, Alexandra, Miles Osborne, and Philipp Koehn (2008). Predicting success in machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 745–54, Honolulu, Hawaii. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bird, Helen, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph, Mark S. Seidenberg, James L. McClelland, and Karalyn Patterson (2003). Deficits in phonology and past tense morphology: what’s the connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3): 502–26.Find this resource:

Bisang, Walter (2011). Word classes. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, pp. 280–302. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bishop, D. V. M. (1992). The underlying nature of specific language impairment. Journal of child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(1): 3–66.Find this resource:

Blake, Barry J. (1979). Pitta-Pitta. In R. M. W. Dixon and Barry Blake (eds), Handbook of Australian Languages, vol. 1, pp. 182–242. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Find this resource:

Blake, Barry J. (1994). Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Blau, Joyce (1980).Manuel de kurde: (dialecte Sorani): grammaire, textes de lecture, vocabulaire kurde-français et français-kurde. Paris: Klincksieck.Find this resource:

Blevins, James P. (2001). Realisation-based lexicalism (Review article on Farrell Ackerman and Gert Webelhuth, A Theory of Predicates). Journal of Linguistics, 37: 355–65.Find this resource:

Blevins, James P. (2006a). English inflection and derivation. In Bas Aarts and April M. McMahon (eds), Handbook of English Linguistics, pp. 507–36. London: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Blevins, James P. (2006b). Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 42: 531–73.Find this resource:

Blevins, James P. (2007). Conjugation classes in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica, 43: 250–67.Find this resource:

Blevins, James P. (2008). Declension classes in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica, 44: 241–67.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette (1996). Mokilese reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, 27(3): 523–30.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette (1999). Untangling Leti infixation. Oceanic Linguistics, 38(2): 383–403.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette (2005). Understanding antigemination. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges, and David S. Rood (eds), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, pp. 203–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette and John Lynch (2009). Morphological conditions on regular sound change?: A reanalysis of *l-loss in Paamese and Southeast Ambrym. Oceanic Linguistics, 48(1): 111–29.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette and Andrew Pawley (2010). Typological implications of Kalam predictable vowels. Phonology, 1–44.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette and Andrew Wedel (2009). Inhibited sound change: an evolutionary approach to lexical competition. Diachronica, 26: 143–83.Find this resource:

Bloch, Bernard (1947). English verb inflection. Language 23: 399–418.Find this resource:

Bloomfield, Leonard. (1933) Language. New York: Holt.Find this resource:

Blount, Ben G. (1988). Cognition and phonology in acquisition of plurals and possessives by Luo children. Language Sciences, 10: 225–40.Find this resource:

Blum, Lenore and Manuel Blum (1975). Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference. Information and control, 28(2): 125–55.Find this resource:

Blythe, Joseph (2009). Doing referring in Murrinh-Patha conversation. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Find this resource:

Blythe, Joseph (2010). From ethical datives to number markers in Murriny Patha. In Rachel Hendery and Jennifer Hendriks (eds), Grammatical change: Theory and Description, pp. 157–84. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. (p. 606) Find this resource:

Blythe, Joseph (2013). Preference organization driving structuration: evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization. Language, 89(4): 883–919.Find this resource:

Blythe, Joseph, Rachel Nordlinger, and Nick Reid (2007). Murriny Patha finite verb paradigms. MS, Wadeye.Find this resource:

Bobaljik, JonathanD. (2008). Paradigms, optimal and otherwise: a case for skepticism. In Asaf Bachrach and Andrew Nevins, Inflectional Identity, pp. 29–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bodrumlu, Tugba, Kevin Knight, and Sujith Ravi (2009). A new objective function for word alignment. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Integer Linear Programming for Natural Language Processing, ILP ‘09, pp. 28–35, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Boelaars, J. H. (1950). The Linguistic Position of South-Western New Guinea. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Find this resource:

Boersma, Paul (1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. IFA Proceedings, 21: 43–58.Find this resource:

Boevé, Alma and Boevé, Marco (2003). Arammba grammar. Unpublished MS.Find this resource:

Boguslavsky, Igor, Leonid Iomdin, and Victor Sizov (2004). Multilinguality in ETAP-3: Reuse of Lexical Resources. In Gilles Sérasset (ed.), COLING 2004 Multilingual Linguistic Resources, pp. 1–8. Geneva, Switzerland: COLING.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej (2007). English-to-czech Factored Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 232–39, Prague, Czech Republic. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej (2011). Analyzing error types in English-czech machine translation. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 95: 63–76.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej and Jan Hajič (2008). Phrase-based and deep syntactic English-to-czech statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 143–6, columbus, OH. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej and Kamil Kos (2010). Failures in English-czech phrase-based MT. In Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and MetricsMATR, pp. 60–6, Uppsala, Sweden. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej and Magdalena Prokopová (2006). Czech-English Word Alignment. In Proceedings of the Fifth International conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), pp. 1236–9. ELRA.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej and Aleš Tamchyna (2011). Improving Translation model by monolingual data. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 330–6, Edinburgh, Scotland. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej and Miroslav Týnovský (2009). Evaluation of tree transfer system. Project Euromatrix–Deliverable 3.4, ÚFAL, charles University, March.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej, Kamil Kos, and David Mareček (2010). Tackling sparse data issue in machine translation evaluation. In Proceedings of the AcL 2010 conference Short Papers, pp. 86–91, Uppsala, Sweden. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej, Bushra Jawaid, and Amir Kamran (2012). Probes in a Taxonomy of Factored Phrase-Based Models. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 253–60, Montréal, canada. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej, Matouš Macháček, Aleš Tamchyna, and Daniel Zeman (2013a). ‘Scratching the Surface of Possible Translations’. In Lecture Notes in computer Science 8082, pp 465–74. Berlin: Springer. (p. 607) Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej, Christian Buck, Chris Callison-Burch, Christian Federmann, Barry Haddow, Philipp Koehn, Christof Monz, Matt Post, Radu Soricut, and Lucia Specia (2013b). Findings of the 2013 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 1–44, Sofia, Bulgaria, August. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bojar, Ondřej, Rudolf Rosa, and Aleš Tamchyna (2013c). Chimera—three heads for English-to-czech translation. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 92–8, Sofia, Bulgaria. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bonami, Olivier and Gilles Boyé (2002). Suppletion and dependency in inflectional morphology. In Frank Van Eynde, Lars Hellan, and Dorothee Beerman (eds), The Proceedings of the 8th International conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 51–70. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Bonami, Olivier and Gilles Boyé (2003). Supplétion et classes flexionnelles dans la conjugai-son du français. Langages, 152: 102–26.Find this resource:

Bonami, Olivier and Gilles Boyé (2007). French pronominal clitics and the design of Paradigm Function Morphology. In Geert E. Booij, Luca Ducceschi, Bernard Fradin, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, and Sergio Scalise (eds), On-line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5) Fréjus 15–18 September 2005, pp. 291–322. Bologna: Università degli Studi di Bologna.Find this resource:

Bonami, Olivier and Pollet Samvelian (2009). Inflectional periphrasis in Persian. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG09 conference, pp. 26–46. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Find this resource:

Bonami, Olivier and Pollet Samvelian (2014). The diversity of inflectional periphrasis in Persian. Journal of Linguistics, 50: 1–56.Find this resource:

Bond, Francis, Stephan Oepen, Melanie Siegel, Ann Copestake, and Dan Flickinger (2005). Open source machine translation with DELPHIN. In Proceedings of the Open-Source Machine Translation Workshop at the 10th Machine Translation Summit, pp. 15–22, Phuket, Thailand.Find this resource:

Bond, Francis, Stephan Oepen, Eric Nichols, Dan Flickinger, Erik Velldal, and Petter Haugereid (2011). Deep open-source machine translation. Machine Translation, 25(2): 87–105.Find this resource:

Bonet, Eulàlia, Maria-Rosa Lloret, and Joan Mascaró (2007). Allomorph selection and lexical preferences: two case studies. Lingua, 117(6): 903–27.Find this resource:

Bopp, Franz (1816). Über das conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der greichischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache. Frankfurt am Main.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit and Kenneth Wexler (1987). The maturation of syntax. In Thomas W. Roeper and Edwin Williams (eds), Parameter-setting and Language Acquisition, pp. 23–172. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.Find this resource:

Boretzky, Norbert and Birgit Igla (1994). Romani mixed dialects. In Peter Bakker and Maarten Mous (eds), Mixed Languages. 15 case Studies in Language Intertwining. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Find this resource:

Borg, Alexander (1985) Cypriot Arabic. A historical and comparative investigation into the phonology and morphology of the Arabic vernacular spoken by the Maronites of Kormakiti village in the Kyrenia district of North-Western cyprus. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Wiesbaden. (p. 608) Find this resource:

Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent, and Carol Chapman (1997). Paradigms, periphrases and pronominal inflection. A feature-based account. In Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1996, pp. 155–79. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Find this resource:

Bossong, Georg (1991). Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In Dieter Wanner and D. A. Kibbee (eds), New Analyses in Romance Linguistics, pp. 143–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Botting, N. and G. Conti-Ramsden (2003). Autism, primary pragmatic difficulties, and specific language impariment: Can we distinguish them using psycholinguistic markers? Developmental Medicine and child Neurology, 45: 515–24Find this resource:

Boucher, J., A. Mayes, and S. Bigham (2008). Memory, language and intellectual ability in low-functioning autism. In J. Boucher and D. Bowler (eds.), Memory in Autism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Boutrais, Jean (1994). Pour une nouvelle cartographie des Peuls. Cahiers d’Études Africaines, 133/135: 137–46.Find this resource:

Bowern, Claire (2004a). Diagnostic similarities and differences between Nyulnyulan and neighbouring languages. In Claire Bowern and Harold Koch (eds), Australian Languages: Classification and the comparative Method, vol. 249, current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pp. 295–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bowern, Claire (2004b). The origins of tense-based case marking in Pitta-Pitta and Wangka-jutjuru. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 24(2): 163–83.Find this resource:

Bowern, Claire (2012). Nyikina paradigms and refunctionalization: a cautionary tale in morphological reconstruction. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 2(1): 7–24.Find this resource:

Bowern, Claire and Harold Koch (2004). Introduction: subgrouping methodology in historical linguistics. In Claire Bowern and Harold Koch (eds), Australian Languages: Classification and the comparative Method, vol. 249, current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pp. 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Boyé, Gilles (2000). Problèmes de morpho-phonologie verbale en français, en espagnol et en italien. PhD thesis, Université Paris 7.Find this resource:

Boyé, Gilles and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (2006). The structure of allomorphy in Spanish verbal inflection. Cuadernos de Lingüística del Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset, 13: 9–24.Find this resource:

Braak, H. and E. Braak (1991). Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropatholgica, 82(4): 239–59.Find this resource:

Bradshaw, J. L. (2001). Developmental Disorders of the Frontostriatal System. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

Brame, Michael (1974). The cycle in phonology: stress in Palestinian, Maltese and Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 5: 39–60.Find this resource:

Brants, Thorsten, Ashok C. Popat, Peng Xu, Franz J. Och, and Jeffrey Dean (2007). Large language models in machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-coNLL), pp. 858–67.Find this resource:

Braugmann, Karl (1908). Formans oder Formativum? Anzeiger für indogermanische Sprach-und Altertumskunde 22: 69–72.Find this resource:

Breedveld, Johanna O. (1995). Form and Meaning in Fulfulde: A Morphophonological Study of Maasinankoore. Leiden: Research School CNWS.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (2001). Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. (p. 609) Find this resource:

Breu, Walter. (1996). Überlegungen zu einer Klassifizierung des grammatischen Wandels im Sprachkontakt (am Beispiel slavischer Kontaktfälle). Sprachtypologie und Universalien-forschung 49: 21–38.Find this resource:

Briggs, Lucy Therina (1976). Dialectical Variation in the Aymara Language of Bolivia and Peru. PhD thesis, Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.Find this resource:

Briggs, Lucy Therina (1993). El idioma aymara: variants regionales y sociales. La Paz: ILCA.Find this resource:

Briggs, Lucy Therina (2001). Estructura del sistema nominal. In Martha Hardman, Juana Vasquez, Juan de Dios Yapita, et al. (eds), Aymara: Compendio de estruc-tura fonológica y gramatical, pp. 171–264. La Paz: Instituto de Lengua y cultura Aymara.Find this resource:

Broadbent, Sylvia (1964). The Southern Sierra Miwok Language. Oakland, CA: University of california Press.Find this resource:

Broadwell, George Aaron (1993). Subtractive morphology in southern Muskogean. International Journal of American Linguistics, 59: 416–29.Find this resource:

Broadwell, George Aaron (2006). A choctaw Reference Grammar. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Find this resource:

Brock, J. (2007). Language abilities in Williams syndrome: a critical review. Development and Psychopathology, 19: 97–127.Find this resource:

Bromberg, H., M. T. Ullman, M. Coppola, G. Marcus, K. Kelly, and K. Levine (1994). A dissociation of memory and grammar: evidence from Williams Syndrome. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Boston University conference on Language Development.Find this resource:

Brooks, Patricia J., Martin D. Braine, Lisa Catalano, and Ruth E. Brody (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: the contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(1): 76–95.Find this resource:

Broselow, Ellen and John McCarthy (1983). A theory of internal reduplication. The Linguistic Review, 3: 25–88.Find this resource:

Brown, Dunstan (1998). Stem indexing and morphophonological selection in the Russian verb: a Network Morphology account. In Ray Fabri, Albert Ortmann, and Teresa Parodi (eds) Models of Inflection, pp. 196–221. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Find this resource:

Brown, Dunstan (2011). Morphological Typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, pp. 487–503. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Dunstan and Marina Chumakina (2012). What there might be and what there is: an introduction to canonical Typology. In Dunstan Brown, Greville G. Corbett, and Marina Chumakina (eds), Canonical Morphology and Syntax, pp. 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Dunstan and Andrew Hippisley (2012). Network Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina, Greville G. Corbett, Gergana D. Popova, and Andrew Spencer (2012). Defining ‘periphrasis’: key notions. Morphology, 22: 233–75.Find this resource:

Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina, and Greville G. Corbett (eds) (2013). Canonical Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Penelope (1998). Children’s first verbs in Tzeltal: evidence for an early verb category. Linguistics, 36: 713–53. (p. 610) Find this resource:

Brown, Peter F., J. Cocke, Stephen. A. Della Pietra, Vincent J. Della Pietra, Frederick Jelinek, Robert L. Mercer, and P. S. Roossin (1988). A statistical approach to French/English translation. In Proceedings of the Second International conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages; Panel 2: Paradigms for MT, Pittsburg, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.Find this resource:

Brown, Peter F., Stephen A. Della Pietra, Vincent J. Della Pietra, and Robert L. Mercer (1993). The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19(2): 263–311.Find this resource:

Brown, Roger (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Brun, Dina, Sergey Avrutin, and Maria Babyonyshev (1999). Aspect and its temporal interpretation during the optional infinitive stage in Russian. In Annabel Greenhill, Heather Littlefield, and Cheryl Tano (eds), BUcLD Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University conference on Language Development, pp. 120–31. Boston: Boston University.Find this resource:

Bruner, Jerome S., J. J. Goodnow, and G. A. Austin (1956). A Study of Thinking. London: Chapman and Hall.Find this resource:

Bubenik, Vit (1996). The Structure and Development of Middle Indo-Aryan Dialects. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Find this resource:

Budwig, Nancy (1990). The linguistic marking of nonprototypical agency: an exploration into children’s use of passives. Linguistics, 28: 1221–52.Find this resource:

Bulut, Christiane (2005). Iranian influences in Sonqor Turkic. In Éva Ágnes csató, Bo Isaksson, and Carina Jahani (eds), Linguistic convergence and Areal Diffusion, pp. 241–70. Abingdon and New York: Routledgecurzon.Find this resource:

Burzio, Luigi (1994). Principles of English Stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Burzio, Luigi (1998). Multiple correspondence. Lingua, 104: 79–109.Find this resource:

Burzio, Luigi (2002a). Surface-to-surface morphology: when your representations turn into constraints. In Paul Boucher (ed.), Many Morphologies, pp. 142–177. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Burzio, Luigi (2002b). Missing players: phonology and the past-tense debate. Lingua, 112(3): 157–99.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology. A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (2007). Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. and Dan I. Slobin (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58: 265–89.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins (1990). On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. In William Croft, Keith Denning, and Suzanne Kemmer (eds), Studies in Typology and Diachrony, pp. 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bye, Patrik (2007). Allomorphy—selection, not optimization. In Sylvia Blaho, Patrik Bye, and Martin Krämer, Freedom of Analysis?, pp. 63–92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bye, Patrik and Peter Svenonius (2012). Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Callison-Burch, Chris, Philipp Koehn, Christof Monz, Kay Peterson, Mark Przybocki, and Omar Zaidan (2010). Findings of the 2010 joint workshop on statistical machine translation and metrics for machine translation. In Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop (p. 611) on Statistical Machine Translation and MetricsMATR, pp. 17–53, Uppsala, Sweden, July. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Callison-Burch, Chris, Philipp Koehn, Christof Monz, and Omar Zaidan (2011). Findings of the 2011 workshop on statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 22–64, Edinburgh, Scotland. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Callison-Burch, Chris, Philipp Koehn, Christof Monz, Matt Post, Radu Soricut, and Lucia Specia (2012). Findings of the 2012 workshop on statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Montreal, canada. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Cameron-Faulkner, Thea and Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy (2000). Stem alternants as morphological signata: evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18: 813–35.Find this resource:

Campbell, Lyle and William Poser (2008). Language classification: History and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Canger, Una and Anne Jensen (2007). Grammatical borrowing in Nahuatl. In Yaron Matras and Jeanette Sakel (eds), Grammatical Borrowing in cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 403–18. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Capidan, Theodor (1925). Meglenoromânii. I. Istoria şi graiul lor (Academia Română. Studii şi cercetări VII). Bucureşti: Cultura Naţională.Find this resource:

Caramazza, Alfonso, Alessandro Laudanna, and Christina Romani (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28: 297–332.Find this resource:

Carlin, Eithne B. (2006) Feeling the need: the borrowing of cariban functional categories into Mawayana (Arawak). In R. M.W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic Typology, pp. 313–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Carstairs, Andrew (1983). Paradigm economy. Journal of Linguistics, 19: 115–25.Find this resource:

Carstairs, Andrew (1988). Some implications of phonologically conditioned suppletion. In Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Maarle (eds), Yearbook of Morpholology 1988, pp. 67–94. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1987). Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1991). Inflection classes: two questions with one answer. In Frans Plank (ed.), Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection, pp. 213–53. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1994). Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language, 70: 737–88.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (2001). Grammatically conditioned allomorphy, paradigm structure and the ancestry constraint. Transactions of the Philological Society, 99: 223–45.Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (2005). Basic terminology. In Pavel Štekauer and Rochelle Lieber (eds), Handbook of Word Formation, pp. 5–23. Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

Cer, Daniel M., Christopher D. Manning, and Daniel Jurafsky (2010). The best lexical metric for phrase-based statistical MT system optimization. In HLT-NAAcL, pp 555–63. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo (2000). Lingüística aimara. Lima: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos.Find this resource:

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo (2006). El chipaya o la lengua de los hombres del agua. Lima: Pontificia Univ. Católica del Perú. (p. 612) Find this resource:

Cettolo, Mauro, Nicola Bertoldi, and Marcello Federico (2011). Bootstrapping Arabic-Italian SMT through comparable texts and pivot translation. In Mikel L. Forcada, Heidi Depraetere, and Vincent Vandeghinste (eds), Proceedings of the 15th International conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT), pp. 249–56. Leuven: European Association for Machine Translation.Find this resource:

Chafe, Wallace. (1998). How a historical linguist and a native speaker understand a complex morphology. In Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin, and Dieter Stein (eds), Historical Linguistics 1997: Selected papers from the 13th international conference on historical linguistics, pp. 101–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Chafe, Wallace (1999). Florescence as a force in grammaticalization. In Spike Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization, pp. 39–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Chafe, Wallace (2008). Syntax as a repository of historical relics. In Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds), Constructions in Language change, pp. 261–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chan, Erwin (2008). Structures and Distributions in Morphology Learning. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Chang, Yin-Wen, and Michael Collins (2011). Exact decoding of phrase-based translation models through lagrangian relaxation. In Proceedings of the 2011 conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 26–37, Edinburgh, Scotland. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Channon, S., P. Pratt, and M. M. Robertson (2003). Executive function, memory, and learning in Tourette’s syndrome. Neuropsychology, 17(2), 247–54.Find this resource:

Chelba, Ciprian and Federick Jelinek (1998). Exploiting syntactic structure for language modeling. In Christian Boitet and Pete Whitelock (eds), Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics and Seventeenth International conference on computational Linguistics, pp. 225–31, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Find this resource:

Chen, Stanley F. and Joshua Goodman (1996). An empirical study of smoothing techniques for language modeling. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics, AcL ‘96, pp. 310–18, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Chiang, David (2005). A hierarchical phrase-based model for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics (AcL’05), pp. 263–70, Ann Arbor, MI. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Chiang, David (2007). Hierarchical phrase-based translation. Computational Linguistics, 33(2): 201–28.Find this resource:

Chiang, David (2010). Learning to translate with source and target syntax. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics, pp 1443–52, Uppsala, Sweden. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Chiang, David and Kevin Knight (2006). An introduction to synchronous grammars: part of a tutorial given at AcL 2006, <http://www3.nd.edu/~dchiang/papers/synchtut-slides.pdf>.

Childers, J. B., J. Vaughan and D. A. Burquest (2007). Joint attention and word learning in Ngas-speaking toddlers in Nigeria. Journal of child Language 34: 199–225.Find this resource:

Choi, Soonja and Alison Gopnik (1993). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: an early verb spurt in Korean. In E. V. Clark (ed.), The Proceedings of the 25th Annual child Language Research Forum, pp. 96–105. New York: Cambridge University Press. (p. 613) Find this resource:

Choi, Soonja and Alison Gopnik (1995). Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: a cross-linguistic study. Journal of child Language, 22: 497–529.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1956). Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 2: 113–24.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1975). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Find this resource:

Chumakina, Marina and Corbett, Greville G. (eds) (2012). Periphrasis: the Role of Syntax and Morphology in Paradigms. Oxford: The British Academy and Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Chung, Sandra (1981). Transitivity and surface filters in Chamorro. In Jim Hollyman and Nadrew Pawley (eds), Studies in Pacific Languages and cultures in Honour of Bruce Biggs, pp. 311–32. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Find this resource:

Chung, Sandra (1998). The Design of Agreement: Evidence from Chamorro. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Churchward, C. Maxwell (1940). Rotuman Grammar and Dictionary. Sydney: Australasia Medical Publishing Co [Reprinted 1978, New York: AMS Press].Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22.Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald (2006). Dual-mechanism morphology. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 4: 1–5.Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald and M. Almazan (1998). Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome. Cognition, 68, 167–98.Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald and C. Temple (2003). Words and rules in children with Williams syndrome. In Y. Levy and J. Schaeffer (eds), Language competence across Populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment, pp. 323–52.: Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald, M. Ring, and C. Temple (2003). Lexical and morphological skills in English-speaking children with Williams syndrome. Essex Research Reports in linguistics, 43: 1–27.Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald, M. Ring, and C. Temple (2004). Lexical and morphological skills in English-speaking children with Williams syndrome. In S. Bartke and J. Siegmueller (eds.), Williams syndrome across languages, pp. 221–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Clark, Alexander (2001). Learning morphology with pair hidden Markov models. Proceedings of the Student Workshop at AcL, Toulouse, France, pp. 55–60. <http://aclanthology.info/volumes/proceedings-of-the-39th-annual-meeting-of-the-association-for-computational-linguistics>.Find this resource:

Clark, Alexander (2010). Efficient, correct, unsupervised learning of context-sensitive languages. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 28–37, Uppsala, Sweden. Association for computational Linguistics. <http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/home/alexc/papers/conll2010.pdf>.Find this resource:

Clark, Alexander and Shalom Lappin (2011). Computational learning theory and language acquisition. In R. Kempson, N. Asher, and T. Fernando (eds), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol. 14 of Philosophy of Linguistics, pp. 441–71. Oxford: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve (1987). The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, pp. 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. (p. 614) Find this resource:

Clements, G. Nick (2009). The role of features in phonological inventories. In Eric Raimy and Charles E. Cairns (eds), Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonology, pp. 19–68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Clifton, Ann and Anoop Sarkar (2011). Combining morpheme-based machine translation with post-processing morpheme prediction. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies—Volume 1, HLT ‘11, pp. 32–42, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Coler, Matt (2014). A Grammar of Muylaq’ Aymara: Aymara as Spoken in Southern Peru. Leiden: Brill.Find this resource:

Colin, Georges Séraphin. (1929) Le parler berbère des G˙ mara, Hesperis 9: 43–58.Find this resource:

Colombo, L., A. Laudanna, M. De Martino, and C. Brivio (2004). Regularity and/or consistency in the production of the past participle? Brain and Language, 90(1–3): 128–42.Find this resource:

Colombo, L., C. Fonti, and A. Stracciari (2009). Italian verb inflection in Alzheimer dementia. Neuropsychologia, 47(4): 1069–78.Find this resource:

Comrie, Bernard (1978). Ergativity. In Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language pp. 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.Find this resource:

Comrie, Bernard (1989). Language Universals and linguistic typology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwells.Find this resource:

Comrie, Bernard and Maria Polinsky (1998). The great Daghestanain case hoax. In Anna Siewierska and Jae Jung Song (eds), Case, Typology and Grammar, pp. 95–114. Ansterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Connelly, Matthew (1984). Basotho children’s acquisition of noun morphology. PhD thesis, University of Essex.Find this resource:

Cooreman, Ann M. (1987). Transitivity and Discourse continuity in Chamorro Narratives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Copestake, Ann, Dan Flickinger, Robert Malouf, Susanne Riehemann, and Ivan Sag (1995). Translation using Minimal Recursion Semantics. In Proceedings of the 6th International conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation (TMI-95), pp. 15–32. Leuven: International Association for Machine Translation.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (1983). Hierarchies, Targets and controllers: Agreement Patterns in Slavic. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2005). The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges, and David S. Rood (eds), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories (Studies in Language companion Series 72), pp. 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2007). Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language, 83: 8–42.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2009a). Morphology-free syntax: two potential counter-examples from Serbo-croat. In Steven Franks, Vrinda Chidambaram, and Brian Joseph (eds), A Linguist’s Linguist: Studies in South Slavic Linguistics in Honor of E. Wayles Browne, pp. 149–66. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2009b). Canonical inflectional classes. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé, and Jesse Tseng (eds), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes: Morphology in Bordeaux, pp. 1–11. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Available at: <http://www.lingref.com/cpp/decemb/6/abstract2231.html>. (p. 615) Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2010). Classic problems at the syntax–morphology interface: whose are they? In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG10 conference, pp. 255–68, Paris: Université Paris Diderot, Paris 7. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. (2012). Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. and Matthew Baerman (2006). Prolegomena to a typology of morphological features. Morphology, 16: 231–46.Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. and Norman M. Fraser (1993). Network morphology: a DATR account of Russian inflectional morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 29: 113–42. [Reprinted 2003 in Francis X. Katamba (ed.), Morphology: Critical concepts in Linguistics, VI: Morphology: Its Place in the Wider context, pp. 364–96. London: Routledge.]Find this resource:

Corbett, Greville G. and Alfred D. Mtenje (1987). Gender agreement in chichewa. Studies in African Linguistics, 18(1): 1–38.Find this resource:

Corbí-Bellot, Antonio M., Mikel L. Forcada, Sergio Ortiz-Rojas, Juan Antonio Pérez-Ortiz, Gema Ramírez-Sánchez, Felipe Sánchez-Martínez, Iñaki Alegria, Aingeru Mayor, and Kepa Sarasola (2005). An open-source shallow-transfer machine translation engine for the Romance languages of Spain. In Proceedings of the Tenth conference of the European Assoc-itation for Machine Translation, pp. 79–86. Budapest: European Association for Machine Translation.Find this resource:

Corbin, Danielle (1987). Morphologie dérivationelle et structuration du lexique, vols 193, 194, Linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. [two volumes].Find this resource:

Corston-Oliver, Simon and Michael Gamon (2004). Normalizing German and English inflectional morphology to improve statistical word alignment. In Proceedings of the conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, vol. 3265 of Lecture Notes in computer Science, pp. 48–57. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Find this resource:

Cortade, Jean-Marie (1969). Essai de grammaire touareg (dialecte de l’Ahaggar). Algiers: Université d’Alger, Institut de Recherches Sahariennes.Find this resource:

Cortese, M. J., D. A. Balota, S.D. Sergent-Marshall, R. L. Buckner, and B. T. Gold (2006). Consistency and regularity in past tense verb generation in healthy aging, Alzheimer’s disease, and semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(6), 856–76.Find this resource:

Costenoble, Hermann (1940). Die chamoro Sprache. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Find this resource:

Courtney, Ellen H. and Muriel Saville-Troike (2002). Learning to construct verbs in Navajo and Quechua. Journal of child Language, 623–54.Find this resource:

Cover, Rebecca T. (2005). When antecedents matter: possessive pronouns in Pulaar. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.Find this resource:

Cover, Rebecca T. (2009). Focus on ko: The syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of identificational focus in Pulaar. Unpublished mansuscript. University of california, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Covington, M. A., C. He, C. Brown, L. Naci, J. T. McClain, B. S. Fjordbak, J. Semple, and J. Brown (2005). Schizophrenia and the structure of language: the linguist’s view. Schizophrenia Research, 77: 85–98.Find this resource:

Crago, Martha B. and Shanley E. M. Allen (2001). Early finiteness in Inuktitut: the role of language structure and input. Language Acquisition, 9(1): 59–111.Find this resource:

Crane, L. and L. Goddard (2008). Episodic and semantic autobiographical memory in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3): 498–506.Find this resource:

Crazzolara, J. P. (1933). Outlines of a Nuer Grammar. Vienna: Verlag der internationalen Zeitschrift ‘Anthropos’. (p. 616) Find this resource:

Creider, Chet A. and Jane Tapsubei Creider (1989). A Grammar of Nandi. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Find this resource:

Crosswhite, Katherine (1998). Segmental vs. prosodic correspondence in Chamorro. Phonology, 15: 281–316.Find this resource:

Crosswhite, Katherine (1999). Intra-paradigmatic homophony avoidance in two dialects of Slavic. In Matthew Gordon (ed.), UcLA Working Papers in Linguistics 1: Papers in Phonology 2, pp. 48–67. Los Angeles, CA: Department of Linguistics, UcLA.Find this resource:

Crow, T. J., D. J. Done, and A. Sacker (1995). Childhood precursors of psychosis as clues to its evolutionary origins. European Archives of Psychiatry and clinical Neuroscience, 245, 61–9.Find this resource:

Crowhurst, Megan (1994). Foot extrametricality and template mapping in cupeño. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12: 177–201.Find this resource:

Crowley, Terry (2008). Pidgin and creole morphology. In Silvia Kouwenberg and John Victor Singler (eds), The Handbook of Pidgin and creole Studies, pp. 74–97. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Find this resource:

Crowley, Terry and Claire Bowern (2010). Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Creutz, Mathias and Krista Lagus (2007). Unsupervised models for morpheme segmentation and morphology learning. AcM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 4(1): 3:1– 3:34.Find this resource:

Culy, Christopher D. (1996). Agreement and Fula pronouns. Studies in African Linguistics, 25: 1–26.Find this resource:

Culy, Christopher D. and Boureima Gnalibouly Dicko (1988). Fula makko and theories of anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2): 315–19.Find this resource:

Cutler, Anne, John A. Hawkins, and Gary Gilligan (1985). The suffixing preference: a processing explanation. Linguistics, 23(5): 723–58.Find this resource:

Cysouw, Michael (2003). The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dąbrowska, Ewa (2001). Learning a morphological system without a default: the Polish genitive. Journal of child Language, 28: 545–74.Find this resource:

Dąbrowska, Ewa (2008). The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: an empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 58: 931–51.Find this resource:

Dąbrowska, Ewa and Marcin Szczerbiń ski (2006). Polish children’s productivity with case marking: the role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological diversity. Journal of child Language, 33L 559–97.Find this resource:

Dahl, Östen (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Find this resource:

Dahl, Östen and Viveka Velupillai (2005). Tense and aspect. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 266–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Daland, Robert, Andrea D. Sims, and Janet B. Pierrehumbert (2007). Much ado about nothing: a social network model of Russian paradigmatic gaps. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics, pp. 936–43. Prague, Czech Republic. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Dalby, J. T. and Williams, R. (1986). Preserved reading and spelling ability in psychotic disorders. Psychological Medicine, 16: 171–5. (p. 617) Find this resource:

Damasio, A. R. and G. W. Van Hoesen (1985). The limbic system and the localisation of herpes simplex encephalitis. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 28(4): 297– 301.Find this resource:

Darkins, A. W., V. A. Fromkin, and D. F. Benson (1988). A characterization of the prosodic loss in Parkinson’s disease. Brain and Language, 34: 315–32.Find this resource:

Davies, W. D. (1986). Choctaw Verb Agreement and Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Davis, Stuart and Isao Ueda (2006). Prosodic vs. morphological mora augmentation. Lexicon Forum, 2: 121–43.Find this resource:

Dawkins, Richard M. (1916). Modern Greek in Asia Minor: A Study of the Dialects of Sílli, cappadocia and Phárasa with Grammar, Texts, Translations and Glossary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dediu, Dan (2011). A Bayesian phylogenetic approach to estimating the stability of linguistic features and the genetic biasing of tone. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1704): 474.Find this resource:

de Gispert, Adrià, José B. Mariño, and Josep M. Crego (2005). Improving statistical machine translation by classifying and generalizing inected verb forms. In Eurospeech 2005, pp. 3185–88. Lisbon, Portugal.Find this resource:

de Gispert, Adrià, Sami Virpioja, Mikko Kurimo, and William Byrne (2009). Minimum bayes risk combination of translation hypotheses from alternative morphological decompositions. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual conference of the North American chapter of the Association for computational Linguistics, companion Volume: Short Papers, NAAcL-Short ‘09, pp. 73–76, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

De Haan, Ferdinand (2006). Typological approaches to modality. In William Frawley (ed.), The Expression of Modality, pp. 27–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

de Jong, Nivja H. (2002). Morphological families in the mental lexicon. PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen.Find this resource:

de Lacy, Paul (2012). Morpho-phonological polarity. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

DeLisi, L. E. (2001). Speech disorder in schizophrenia: review of the literature and exploration of its relation to the uniquely human capacity for language. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27(3): 481–96.Find this resource:

DeLisi, L. E., M. Sakuma, M. Kushner, D. L. Finer, A. L. Hoff, and T. J. Crow (1997). Anomalous cerebral asymmetry and language processing in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 23(2): 255–71.Find this resource:

DeLong, M. R. (1990). Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin. Trends in Neurosciences, 13(7): 281–5.Find this resource:

DeLong, M.and Wichmann, T. (2009). Update on models of basal ganglia function and dysfunction. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 15(S3): S237–40.Find this resource:

Delplanque, Alain (2009). Identité des langues gur du Burkina Faso. Ms, Université d’OrléansFind this resource:

Dempster, A. P., N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin (1977). Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EMA lgorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39(1): 1–38.Find this resource:

Demuth, Katherine A. (1989). Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language, 65: pp. 56–80.Find this resource:

Demuth, Katherine A. (1990). Subject, topic and Sesotho passive. Journal of child Language 17: 67–84. (p. 618) Find this resource:

Demuth, Katherine. A. (2003). The acquisition of Bantu languages. In Derek Nurse and Gerard Phillipson (eds), The Bantu Languages, pp. 209–22. Richmond: Curzon Press.Find this resource:

Demuth, Katherine A. and Donald Ellis (2009). Revisiting the acquisition of Sesotho noun class prefixes. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura and şeyda Özçalışkan (eds), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin pp. 93–104. New York: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

Denkowski, Michael, and Alon Lavie (2010). METEOR-NEXT and the METEOR paraphrase tables: improved evaluation support for five target languages. In Proceedings of the AcL 2010 Joint Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and Metrics MATR. Uppsala: Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Deo, Ashwini (2006). Diachronic change and synchronic typology: Tense and aspect in Modern Indo-Aryan Languages. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Find this resource:

Diehl, J. J., L. Bennetto, D. Watson, C. Gunlogson, and J. McDonough (2008). Resolving ambiguity: a psycholinguisic approach to understanding prosody processing in high-functioning autism. Brain and Language, 106(2): 144–52.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (2000). Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo-Saharan languages. Anthropological Linguistics, 42(2): 214–61.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (2001a). Areal diffusion versus genetic inheritance: an African perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M.W. Dixon (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, pp. 358–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (2001b) Language shift and morphological convergence in the Nilotic Area. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika, 16/17: 83–124.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (2002). Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Donohue, Mark (2001). Animacy, class and gender in Burmeso. In Andrew Pawley, Malcolm Ross, and Darrell Tryon (eds), The Boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian Linguistics in Honour of Tom Dutton (Pacific Linguistics 514), pp. 97–115. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Donohue, Mark (2003). Agreement in the Skou language: a historical account. Oceanic Linguistics, 42: 479–98.Find this resource:

Donohue, Mark (2004). A grammar of the Skou language of New Guinea. MS, National University of Singapore.Find this resource:

Donohue, Mark (2005). Configurationality in the languages of New Guinea. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 25(2): 181–218.Find this resource:

Donohue, Mark (2008). Semantic alignment systems: what’s what, and what’s not. In Mark Donohue and S?ren Wichmann (eds), Semantic Alignment: Typological and Descriptive Studies, pp. 24n75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Donohue, Mark and Lea Brown (1999). Ergativity: some additions from Indonesia. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 19(1): 57–76.Find this resource:

Dorr, Bonnie J., Pamela W. Jordan, and John W. Benoit (1998). A survey of current paradigms in machine translation. Technical Report LAMP-TR-027, UMIAcS-TR-98-72, cS-TR-3961, University of Maryland, College Park.Find this resource:

Downing, Laura J. (1998). On the prosodic misalignment of onsetless syllables. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16: 1–52. (p. 619) Find this resource:

Downing, Laura J. (1999). Prosodic stem ̸= prosodic word in Bantu. In T. Alan Hall and Ursula Kleinhenz (eds), Studies on the phonological word, pp. 73–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Downing, Laura J. (2006). Canonical Forms in Prosodic Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Drabbe, Peter (1955). Spraakkunst van het Marind. Studia Instituti Anthropos 11.Find this resource:

Dressler, Wolfgang U. (2003). Naturalness and morphological change. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, pp. 461–71. London: Blackwell Publishers.Find this resource:

Dressler, Wolfgang U. (2007). Introduction. In Typological Perspectives on the Acquisition of Noun and Verb Morphology, Antwerp Papers in Linguistics.Find this resource:

Dreyer, Markus and Daniel Marcu (2012). Hyter: Meaning-equivalent semantics for translation evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2012 conference of the North American chapter of the Association for computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 162–71, Montréal, canada, June. Association for computational Linguistics. (p. 620) Find this resource:

van Driem, George (1993). A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

van Driem, George (1997). A new analysis of the Limbu verb. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman Languages of the Himalayas, vol. 14, Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, pp. 157–173. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Druks, Judit (2006). Morpho-synactic and morpho-phonological deficits in the production of regularly and irregularly inflected verbs. Aphasiology, 20(9): 993–1017.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1986). Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language, 62(4): 808–45.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2005). Prefixing versus suffixing in inflectional morphology. In Martin Haspelmath et al. (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 1103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew (2007). Noun phrase structure. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Complex constructions, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 2, pp. 151–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dubinsky, Stanley and Mazmba Nzwanga (1994). A challenge to Burzio’s generalization: impersonal transitive in western Bantu. Linguistics, 32: 47–64.Find this resource:

Duden (2005). Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartsprache. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Find this resource:

Dušek, Ondřej, Zdeněk Žabokrtský, Martin Popel, Martin Majliš, Michal Novák, and David Mareček (2012). Formemes in English-czech deep syntactic MT. In Proceedings of NAAcL 2012 Workshop on Machine Translation, pp. 267–74, Montréal, canada. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Dyer, Christopher J. (2007). The “noisier channel”: translation from morphologically complex languages. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 207–11, Prague, Czech Republic. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Dyer, Christopher J. (2009). Using a maximum entropy model to build segmentation lattices for MT. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual conference of the North American chapter of the Association for computational Linguistics, NAAcL ‘09, pp. 406–14, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Dyer, Christopher J., Jonathan Clark, Alon Lavie, and Noah A. Smith (2011a). Unsupervised word alignment with arbitrary features. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies—Volume 1, HLT ‘11, pp. 409–19, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Dyer, Christopher J., Kevin Gimpel, Jonathan H. Clark, and Noah A. Smith (2011b). The cMU-ARK German–English translation system. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 337–43, Edinburgh, Scotland. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Eichenbaum, H. and N. J. Cohen (2001). From conditioning to conscious Recollection: Memory Systems of the Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Eigsti, I.-M. and L. Bennetto (2009). Grammaticality judgments in autism: deviance or delay. Journal of child Language, 36(5), 999–1201.Find this resource:

Eigsti, I.-M., L. Bennetto, and M. B. Dadlani (2007). Beyond pragmatics: morphosyntactic development in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(6), 1007–23.Find this resource:

Eisenbeiss, Sonja, Susanne Bartke, and Harald Clahsen (2005). Structural and lexical case in child German: evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Language Acquisition, 13: 3–32.Find this resource:

El Hannouche, Jamal (2008). Ghomara Berber: a brief grammatical survey. MA Thesis, Leiden University.Find this resource:

Elšík, Viktor and Yaron Matras (2006).Markedness and Language change: The Romani sample. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Elson, Benjamin and Velma Pickett (1965). An Introduction to Morphology and Syntax, 4th edn. Santa Ana, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Embick, David (2000). Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(2): 185–230.Find this resource:

Embick, David (2010). Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Enfield, N. J. (2005). Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34: 181–206.Find this resource:

Enfield, N. J. (2006). On genetic and areal linguistics in mainland South-East Asia. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in comparative Linguistics, pp. 255–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

England, Nora (2001). Sufijos verbales derivacionales. In Martha Hardman, Juana Vasquez, Juan de Dios Yapita, et al. (eds), Aymara: Compendio de estructura fonológica y gramatical, pp. 171–264. La Paz: Instituto de Lengua y cultura Aymara.Find this resource:

Epps, Patience (2007). Grammatical borrowing in Hup. In Yaron Matras and Jeanette Sakel (eds), Grammatical Borrowing in cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 551–66. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Epps, Patience (2008). From ‘wood’ to future tense: nominal origins of the future construction in Hup. Studies in Language 32(2): 383–404.Find this resource:

Erjavec, Tomaz (2010). Multext-east version 4: multilingual morphosyntactic specifications, lexicons and corpora. In Nicoletta Calzolari (conference chair), Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odjik, Stelios Piperidis, Mike Rosner, and Daniel Tapias (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREc’10). Valletta, Malta. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Find this resource:

Ervin, S. M. (1964). Imitation and structural change in children’s language. In New Directions in the Study of Language, pp. 163–89. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Es’kova, N. A. (1989). Mexaničeskij akcentnyj sdvig kak pričina defektnosti paradigm v russkom literaturnom jazyke. In V. P. Grigor’ev (ed.), Problemy strukturnoj lingvistiki 1985–1987, pp. 96–103. Moscow: Nauka. (p. 621) Find this resource:

ESAA Project (1974). Si Nga’. Agana, Guam: Government of Guam, Department of Education.Find this resource:

Evans, Bethwyn (2003). A Study of Valency-changing Devices in Proto Oceanic. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas (2003). Context, culture and structuration in the languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32: 13–40.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas (2012). Nen Assentives and the phenomenon of dialogic parallelisms. In Andrea C. Schalley (ed.), Practical Theories and Empirical Practice: A Linguistic Perspective, pp. 159–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas (2014). Positional verbs in Nen. Oceanic Linguistics, 53(2): 225–55.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas (2015). Valency in Nen. In Andrej Malchukov and Bernard Comrie (eds), Valency classes in the World’s Languages, pp. 1049–96. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterFind this resource:

Evans, Nicholas and Julia Miller (in press). Nen. Journal of the International Phonetics Association.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas and Stephen C. Levinson (2009). The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5): 429–48.Find this resource:

Evans, Roger and Gerald Gazdar (1996). DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22: 167–216.Find this resource:

Eyigöz, Elif, Daniel Gildea, and Kemal Oflazer (2013). Simultaneous word–morpheme alignment for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the North American chapter of the Association for computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 32–40, Atlanta, Georgia, June. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Ezeizabarrena, Maria Jose and Maria Pilar Larranaga (1996). Ergativity in Basque: a problem for language acquisition? Linguistics, 34: 955–99.Find this resource:

Fedden, Sebastian (2011). A Grammar of Mian (Mouton Grammar Library 55). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Federico, Marcello, Alessandro Cattelan, and Marco Trombetti (2012). Measuring user productivity in machine translation enhanced computer assisted translation. In Proceedings of AMTA.Find this resource:

Fenson, L., P. S. Dale, J. S. Reznick, E. Bates, D. J. Thal, and S. J. Pethick (1994). Variability in Early communicative Development, vol. 59 Monographs of the Society for Research in child Development. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Fiebach, Christian J., Matthias Schlesewsky, and Angela D. Friederici (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(2): 250–72.Find this resource:

Fife, James and Garett King (1998). Celtic (Indo-European). In Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky (eds) Handbook of Morphology, pp. 477–99. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Find this resource:

Finkel, Raphael and Gregory T. Stump (2002). Generating Hebrew verb morphology by default inheritance hierarchies. In Mike Rosner and Shuly Wintner (eds), Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages: Proceedings of the Workshop, pp. 9–18. Philadelphia. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Finkel, Raphael and Gregory T. Stump (2007). Principal parts and morphological typology. Morphology, 17: 39–75.Find this resource:

Finkel, Raphael and Gregory T. Stump (2009). Principal parts and degrees of paradigmatic transparency. In James P. Blevins and Juliette Blevins (eds), Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, pp. 13–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (p. 622) Find this resource:

Fischer, Olga (2004). Up and Down the cline—the Nature of Grammaticalization, vol. 59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Fiscus, J. G. (1997). A post-processing system to yield reduced word error rates: recognizer output voting error reduction (ROVER). In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, pp. 347–54. IEEE.Find this resource:

Fitzgerald, Colleen and Amy Fountain (1995). The optimal account of Tohono O’oodham truncation. Ms. University of Arizona.Find this resource:

Fitzpatrick, Joyce (2004). A concatenative theory of possible affix types. In I. A. Salanova (ed.), Papers from EVELIN 1: MITWorking Papers in Linguistics.Find this resource:

Flack, Kathryn (2007). Templatic morphology and indexed markedness constraints. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4): 749–58.Find this resource:

Fleck, D.W. (2003). A grammar of Matses. PhD thesis, Rice University.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet and William Sakas (2005). The subset principle in syntax: Costs of compliance. Journal of Linguistics, 41(3): 513–69.Find this resource:

Forshaw, William. (2011). A continuum of incorporation: noun incorporation in Murrinh-Patha. Honours thesis, University of Melbourne.Find this resource:

Foster, George, Roland Kuhn, and Howard Johnson (2006). Phrasetable smoothing for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP ‘06, pp. 53-61. Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Fox, Heidi J. (2002). Phrasal cohesion and statistical machine translation. In EMNLP ‘02: Proceedings of the AcL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing, pp. 304–311. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt (2004). Tense and aspect as coding means for information structure: a potential areal feature. Journal of West African Linguistics 30(2): 53–67.Find this resource:

Frank, Michael C., D. Ichinco, and J. B. Tenenbaum (2008). Principles of generalization for learning sequential structure in language. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, and V. M. Sloutsky, (eds), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the cognitive Science Society, p. 763.Find this resource:

Fraser, Alexander (2009). Experiments in morphosyntactic processing for translating to and from German. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, StatMT ‘09, pp. 115–19, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Fraser, Alexander and Daniel Marcu (2007). Getting the structure right for word alignment: LEAF. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-coNLL), pp. 51–60. Prague, Czech Republic: Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Fraser, Alexander, Marion Weller, Aoife Cahill, and Fabienne Cap (2012). Modeling inflection and word-formation in SMT. In Proceedings of EAcL 2012. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Freeland, L. S. (1951). Language of the Sierra Miwok. Waverly Press.Find this resource:

Freudenthal, D., J. Pine, and F. Gobet (2010). Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIc and the Variational Learning Model. Journal of child Language, 37: 643–69.Find this resource:

Friedman, Victor A. (2002). Macedonian. Munich: Lincom Europe.Find this resource:

Gafos, Adamantios (1996). The articulatory basis of locality in phonology. PhD thesis, Johns Hopkins University. (p. 623) Find this resource:

Gagarina, Natalia (2002). Thoughts on optional infinitives (in Russian). In Daniel Hole, Paul Law, and Niina Zhang (eds), Linguistics by Heart, Webfest for Horst-Dieter Gasde, pp. 1–23. Berlin: Zentrum für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Find this resource:

Galloway, Brent (1993). A Grammar of Upriver Halkomelem. Berkeley, CA: University of california Press.Find this resource:

Gao, Qin and Stephan Vogel (2008). Parallel implementations of word alignment tool. In Software Engineering, Testing, and Quality Assurance for Natural Language Processing, SETQA-NLP ‘08, pp. 49–57, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Gardani, Francesco (2008). Borrowing of Inflectional Morphemes in Language contact. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Find this resource:

Garde, Paul (1972). La distribution du hiatus et le statut du phonème /j/ dans le mot russe. In Dean Worth (ed.), The Slavic Word, pp. 372–87. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Garrett, Andrew (2008). Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Jeff Good (ed.), Explaining Linguistic Universals: Historical convergence and universal grammar, pp. 125–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Garrett, Andrew and Juliette Blevins (2009). Analogical morphophonology. In Sharon Inkelas (ed.), The Nature of theWord: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Geiger, Wilhelm (1994). A Pāli Grammar, tr. by Batakrishna Ghosh, rev. and ed. by K. R. Norman. Oxford: Pali Text Society.Find this resource:

van Gelderen, Elly and Mary Willie (2011). Null arguments in Athabascan. In Paper presented at the 20th International conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka.Find this resource:

Geschwind, D. H. (2011). Genetics of autism spectrum disorders. Trends in cognitive Sciences, 15(9), 409-16.Find this resource:

Gessner, Suzanne and Gunnar Ólafur Hansson (2005). Anti-homophony effects in Dakelh (carrier) valence morphology. In Marc Ettlinger, Nicholas Fleischer, and Mischa Park-Doob (eds), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 93–104. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Find this resource:

Gibson, Edward and Ken Wexler (1994). Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, 25: 407–454.Find this resource:

Gili, J. (1967). Introductory catalan Grammar, 3rd edn. Oxford: The Dolphin Book Co. Ltd.Find this resource:

Gilley, Leoma G. (1992). An Autosegmental Approach to Shilluk Phonology. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Gnanadesikan, A. (1997). Phonology with ternary scales. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (1982). Case systems and case marking in Australian languages: a new interpretation. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 167–96.Find this resource:

Goddard, I. (1975). Algonquian, Wiyot, and Yurok: Proving a distant genetic relationship. Linguistics and Anthropology: In honor of cF Voegelin 26(1).Find this resource:

Gold, E. Mark (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and control, 10(5): 447–74.Find this resource:

Goldberg, T. E. and D. R. Weinberger (1996). Effects of neuroleptic medications on the cognition of patients with schizophrenia: A review of recent studies. Journal of clinical Psychiatry, 57(Supplement 9): S62–S65.Find this resource:

Goldman-Rakic, P. S., S. A. Castner, T. H. Svensson, L. J. Siever, snd G. V. Williams (2004). Targeting the dopamine D1 receptor in schizophrenia: insights for cognitive dysfunction. Psychopharamacology, 174(1): 3–16.Find this resource:

Goldsmith, J. A. (1976). Autosegmental Phonology. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (p. 624) Find this resource:

Goldwater, Sharon and David McClosky (2005). Improving statistical MT through morphological analysis. In HLT ‘05: Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 676–83, Morristown, NJ: Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Golovko, Evgeniy V. (2003). Language contact and group identity: the role of ‘folk’ linguistic engineering. In Yaron Matras and Peter Bakker (eds), The Mixed Language Debate. Theoretical and empirical advances, pp. 177–208. Berlin and New York:Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Golovko, Evgeniy V. and Nikolai B. Vakhtin (1990). Aleut in contact: The cIA enigma. Acta Linguistics Hafniensia 22: 97–125.Find this resource:

Golston, Chris (1996). Direct Optimality Theory. Language 72(4): 713–48.Find this resource:

Gómez, Rebecca L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5).Find this resource:

Gómez, Rebecca L. and L. A. Gerken (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition 70: 109–35.Find this resource:

Good, Jeff (2007). Slouching towards deponency: a family of mismatches in the Bantu verb stem. In Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown, and Andrew Hippisley (eds), Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, pp. 203–30. Oxford: The British Academy and Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goodglass, Harold (1993). Understanding Aphasia. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Goodwin, William W. (1900). Greek Grammar. Boston: Ginn.Find this resource:

Gopnik, Myrna (1997). Language deficits and genetic factors. Trends in cognitive Science, 1(1), 5–9.Find this resource:

Gottschligg, Peter (2006). Elaboration and simplification in Fula verbal morphology. In Bernard Caron and Peter Zima (eds), Sprachbund in the West African Sahel, pp. 145–65. Leuven: Peters.Find this resource:

Gottwald, Richard (1971). Effects of response labels in concept attainment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91(1): 30–3Find this resource:

Green, Antony D. (2006). The independence of phonology and morphology: the celtic mutations. Lingua, 116(11): 1946–85.Find this resource:

Green, Ian (2003). The genetic status of Murrinh-patha. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), The non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia, pp. 280–310. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Green, Rebecca (2003). Proto Maningrida within Proto Arnhem: evidence from verbal inflectional suffixes. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), The Non-Pama-Nyungan languages of Northern Australia: Comparative studies of the continent’s most linguistically complex region, pp. 369–421. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with special reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, pp. 58–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.) (1966). Universals of Language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1977). Noun class markers in Niger-congo: prefixes, suffixes, both or neither. Studies in African Linguistics, Supplement 7: 97–104.Find this resource:

Greenough, J. B., G. L. Kittredge, A. A. Howard, and B. L. D’Ooge (1983). Allen and Gree-nough’s New Latin Grammar for Schools and colleges, 1903. New Rochelle, NY: Aristide D. Caratzas.Find this resource:

Grosh, Andrew and Sylvia Grosh (2004). Kaluli grammar essentials. Ms, Summer Institute of Linguistics. (p. 625) Find this resource:

Grossman, M. and S. Ash (2004). Primary progressive aphasia: a review. Neurocase, 10(1), 3–18.Find this resource:

Grossman, M., F. Payer, K. Onishi, T. White-Devine, D. Morrison, M. D’Esposito, K. Robinson, and A. Alavi (1997). Constraints on the cerebral basis for semantic processing from neuroimaging studies of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 63(2): 152–8.Find this resource:

Haarala, Risto (ed.) (1996). Suomen kielen perussnakirja. Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.Find this resource:

Hajič, Jan, Jarmila Panevová, Eva Hajičová, Petr Sgall, Petr Pajas, Jan Stěpanek, Jiří Havelka, Marie Mikulová, Zdeněk Žabokrtský, and Magd Ševčíková Razímová (2006). Prague Dependency Treeback 2.0. LDc2006T01.Find this resource:

Hajič, Jan, Eva Hajičová, Jarmila Panevová, Petr Sgall, Ondřej Bojar, Silvie cinková, Eva Fučíková, Marie Mikulová, Petr Pajas, Jan Popelka, Jiří Semecký, Jana Sindlerová, Jan Stěpanek, Josef Toman, Zde ˇnka Urešová, and Zdeněk Žabokrtský (2012). Announcing Prague czech-English Dependency Treebank 2.0. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Language Resources and Evaluation conference (LREc’12), pp. 3153–60, Istanbul, Turkey. ELRA, European Language Resources Association.Find this resource:

Häkkinen, Kaisa (ed.) (1990). Nykysuomen Sanakirja: Etymologinen Sanakirja, 6th edn. Helsinki:WSOY.Find this resource:

Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja-Riitta Heinonen, and I. Alho (2004). Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Find this resource:

Hakuta, Kenji. (1982). Interaction between particles and word order in the comprehension and production of simple sentences in Japanese children. Developmental Psychology, 18: 62–76.Find this resource:

Hale, Kenneth L. (1974). Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: an Australian example. 401–58. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Hale, Kenneth L. (1983). Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1: 5–59.Find this resource:

Hale, Mark (2007) Historical linguistics: Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Find this resource:

Hall, T. Alan and John H. G. Scott (2007). Inflectional paradigms have a base: evidence from Southern German dialects. Morphology, 17: 151–78.Find this resource:

Halle, Morris (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 4: 3–16.Find this resource:

Halle, Morris (1990) An approach to morphology. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 20: 150–84.Find this resource:

Halle, Morris (2001). Infixation versus onset metathesis in Tagalog, Chamorro, and Toba Batak. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, pp. 153–68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), The View from Building 20, pp. 111–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Halpern, Aaron (1995). On the Placement and Morphology of clitics. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Find this resource:

Hammond, Michael (1997). Underlying representations in Optimality Theory. In Iggy Roca (ed.), Derivations and constraints in Phonology, pp. 349–66. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Hankamer, Jorge (1989). Morphological Parsing and the Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (1999). ‘When in doubt … ‘: intraparadigmatic dependencies and gaps in Icelandic. In Pius Tamanji, Masako Hirotani, and Nancy Hall (eds), Proceedings of (p. 626) the 29th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, pp. 105–19. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts.Find this resource:

Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur (2011). Diachronic explanations of sound patterns. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan C. L. Yu (eds), Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edn, pp. 319–47. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Hansson, K. and L. B. Leonard (2003). The use and productivity of verb morphology in specific language impairment: An examination of Swedish. Linguistics, 41(2): 351–79.Find this resource:

Hardman, Martha J., Juana Vasquez, Juan de Dios Yapita, et al. (eds) (2001). Aymara: Compendio de estructura fonológica y gramatical. La Paz: Instituto de Lengua y cultura Aymara. Online version: <http://www.ilcanet.org/publicaciones/pdf_compendio.html>, last accessed 19 June 2009.Find this resource:

Hardmeier, Christian, Arianna Bisazza, and Marcello Federico (2010). Fbk at wmt 2010: Word lattices for morphological reduction and chunk-based re-ordering. In Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and MetricsMATR, pp. 88–92, Uppsala, Sweden. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Hargus, Sharon (2007). Witsuwet’en Grammar. Vancouver: University of British columbia Press.Find this resource:

Harrell, Richard S. (1962). A Short Reference Grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Find this resource:

Harris, Alice C. (2000). Where in the word in the Udi clitic? Language 76(3): 593–616.Find this resource:

Harris, Alice C. (2009). Exuberant exponence in Batsbi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 267–303.Find this resource:

Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell (1995). Historical Syntax in cross-linguistic Perspective, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Harris, Martin (1987). French. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The World’s Major Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Harris, Zellig S. (1942). Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis. Language, 18: 169–80.Find this resource:

Harrison, Sheldon (1976). Mokilese Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Find this resource:

Hasan, Saša and Hermann Ney (2008). A multi-genre SMT system for Arabic to French. In Proceedings of the International conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREc 2008, 26 May–1 June 2008, Marrakech, Morocco. European Language Resources Association.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (1993). The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics 31(2): 279–310.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (1994) The growth of affixes in morphological reanalysis. Yearbook of Morphology 1994: 1–29.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (2000). Periphrasis. In Geert Booij, and Christian Lehmann (in collaboration with J. M. Wolfgang Kesselheim and Stavros Skopeteas) (eds), Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-formation, pp. 654–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (2002). Understanding Morphology. London: Hodder Arnold.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (2007). Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 119–32.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (2008). Language Typology and Language Universals. Berlin: de Gruyter. (p. 627) Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (2009). An empirical test of the Agglutination Hypothesis. In Sergio Scalise, Elisabetti Magni, and Antonieta Bisetto, A. (eds), Universals of Language Today, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, pp. 13–29. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Find this resource:

Hayes, Bruce (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20: 253–306.Find this resource:

Hayes, Bruce (1999). Phonetically driven phonology: the role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Michael Darnell, Edith Moravscik, Frederick J. Newmeyer, Michael Noonan, and Kathleen Wheatly (eds), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 243–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Hayes, Bruce, and Colin Wilson (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry, 27(7): 1026–39.Find this resource:

Haygood, R. C. and L. E. Bourne (1965). Attribute- and rule-learning aspects of conceptual behavior. Psychological Review, 72(3): 175–95.Find this resource:

Heafield, Kenneth and Alon Lavie (2010). Combining machine translation output with open source, The carnegie Mellon Multi-Engine Machine Translation Scheme. In Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics—Special Issue on Open Source Machine Translation Tools, no. 93 in Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics. Charles University, January.Find this resource:

Heath, Jeffrey (1978). Linguistic Diffusion in Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Find this resource:

Heath, Jeffrey. (1997) Lost wax: abrupt replacement of key morphemes in Australian agreement complexes. Diachronica: 14: 197–232.Find this resource:

Heath, Jeffrey (1998). Hermit crabs: formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution. Language, 74(4): 728–59.Find this resource:

Heath, Jeffrey (2005). A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Heath, Jeffrey (2008). A Grammar of Jamsay, vol. 45 of Mouton Grammar Library. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Hebert, L. E., P. A. Scherr, J. L. Bienias, D. A. Bennett, and D. A. Evans (2003). Alzheimer disease in the US population. Archives of Neurology, 60(8): 1119–22.Find this resource:

Heilig, Otto (1898). Grammatick der ostfränkischen Mundart des Taubergrundes und der Nachbarmundarten. Leipzig: Sändig.Find this resource:

Heim, Michael (1982). Contemporary Czech. Columbus, OH: Slavica.Find this resource:

Heine, Bernd (2011). Areas of grammaticalization and geographical typology. In Osamu Hieda, Christa König, and Hirosi Nakagawa (eds), Geographical Typology and Linguistic Areas: With special reference to Africa, pp. 42–61. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva (2005) Language contact and Grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Heinz, Jeffrey (2010). Learning long-distance phonotactics. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(4): 623–61.Find this resource:

Heinz, Jeffrey (2013). Computational theories of learning and developmental psycholinguistics. In Jeffrey Lidz, William Snyder, and Joe Pater (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Developmental Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Helden, W. Andries van (1993). Case and Gender: Concept formation between morphology and syntax (II volumes) (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 20). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Find this resource:

Hermjakob, Ulf (2009). Improved word alignment with statistics and linguistic heuristics. In Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 1, EMNLP ‘09, pp. 229–37, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics. (p. 628) Find this resource:

Hetzron, Robert (1967). Agaw numerals and incongruence in Semitic. Journal of Semitic Studies, 12: 169–193.Find this resource:

Hetzron, Robert (1975). Where the grammar fails. Language, 51: 859–72.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James (2008). The English Perfect and the metaphysics of events. In Jacqueline Lecarme and Jacqueline Guéron (eds), Time and Modality, pp. 173–93. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Find this resource:

Hill, Deborah (1992) Longgu grammar. PhD thesis, Australian National University.Find this resource:

Hill, Eugen (2007). Proportionale Analogie, paradigmatischer Ausgleich und Former-weiterung: Ein Beitrag zur Typologie des morphologischen Wandels. Diachronica, 24(1): 81–118.Find this resource:

Hippisley, Andrew (2010). Lexical Analysis. In Nitin Indurkhya and Frederick Damerau (eds), The Handbook of Natural Language Processing, 2nd edn, pp. 31–57. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Find this resource:

Hjelmslev, Louis. (1943) Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard. Translated 1953 by Francis Whitfield as Prolegomena to a Theory of Language.Find this resource:

Hock, Hans Heinrich (1991). Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Hock, Hans Henrich (2003). Analogical change. In Brian D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, pp. 441–60. London: Blackwell Publishers.Find this resource:

Hockett, Charles F. (1947). Problems of morphemic analysis. Language, 23: 321–43.Find this resource:

Hockett, Charles F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10: 210–34.Find this resource:

Hodges, J. R. and K. Patterson (1997). Semantic memory disorders. Trends in cognitive Sciences, 1(2): 68–72.Find this resource:

Hodges, J. R., D. P. Salmon, and N. Butters (1990). Differential impairment of semantic and episodic memory in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease: A controlled prospective study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 53(12): 1089–95.Find this resource:

Hodges, J. R., K. Patterson, S. Oxbury, and E. Funnell (1992). Semantic dementia. Brain, 115: 1783–806.Find this resource:

Hoekstra, Teun and Nina Hyams (1998). Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 106: 81–112.Find this resource:

Hoffmann, I., D. Nemeth, C. Dye, M. Pákáski, T. Irinyi, and J. Kálmán (2010). Temporal parameters of spontaneous speech in Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(1): 29–34.Find this resource:

Holton, David, Peter Mackridge, and Irene Philippaki-Warburton (1997). Greek: A comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. Routledge: London.Find this resource:

Holton, David, Peter Mackridge, and Irene Philippaki-Warburton (2007). Greek: A comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Holvoet, Axel (2001). On the paradigm of the oblique mood in Lithuanian and Latvian. Linguistica Baltica, 9: 69–86.Find this resource:

Holvoet, Axel (2007). Mood and Modality in Baltic. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagielloń skiego.Find this resource:

Homola, Petr, Vladislav Kuboˇ n, and Jernej Vičič (2009). Shallow transfer between Slavic languages. In Proceedings of Balto-Slavonic Natural Language Processing, pp. 219–32. Cracow: Polska Akademia Nauk.Find this resource:

Hopcroft, J., R. Motwani, and J. Ullman (2001). Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and computation. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Find this resource:

Hopper, Paul and Elizabeth C. Traugott (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Horning, James J. (1969). A study of grammatical inference. PhD thesis, Stanford University. (p. 629) Find this resource:

Horwood, Graham (2001). Antifaithfulness and subtractive morphology. Ms. Rutgers University, available as ROA 466-0901.Find this resource:

Horwood, Graham (2002) Precedence faithfulness governs morpheme position. Ms. Rutgers University, available as ROA 527-602.Find this resource:

Hric, Jan, Jan Hajič, and Vladislav Kuboˇn (2000). Machine translation of very close languages. Proceedings of the 6th Applied Natural Language Processing conference, pp. 7–12.Find this resource:

Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. (1836). Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss aud die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Köningliche Akademie derWissenschaften.Find this resource:

Hume, Elizabeth (2001). Metathesis: formal and functional considerations. In Elizabeth Hume and Jeroen van de Weijer (eds), Surface Syllable Structure and Segment Sequencing, pp. 1–25. Leiden: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Find this resource:

Hume, Elizabeth (2004). The indeterminacy/attestation model of metathesis. Language, 80: 203–37.Find this resource:

Hutchins, John (2003). ALPAC: the (in)famous report. In S. Nirenburg, H. Somers, and Y. Wilks (eds), Readings in Machine Translation, pp. 131–5. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Originally published in MT News International 14 June 1996, 9–12.Find this resource:

Hutchins, John (2005). The first public demonstration of machine translation: the Georgetown-IBM system, 7 January 1954. Expanded version of AMTA-2004 paper. <http://www.hutchinsweb.me.uk/GU-IBM-2005.pdf>, last accessed 8 January 2015.

Hyman, Larry M. (2001). Tone systems. In Martin Haspelmath, W. O. Ekkehard König, and W. Raible (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 1367–80. Berlin and New York:Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Hyman, Larry M. (2008). Directional assymetries in the morphology and phonology of words with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics, 46(2): 309–50.Find this resource:

Hyman, Larry M. and William Leben (2000). Suprasegmental processes. In Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan, Wolfgang Kesselheim (eds), Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, pp. 587–94. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Hymes, Dell. (1956). Na-Déné and positional analysis of categories. American Anthropologist, 58(4): 624–38.Find this resource:

Ichimura, Larry K. (2006). Anti-homophony blocking and its productivity in transparadig-matic relations. PhD thesis, Boston University.Find this resource:

Igla, Birgit. (1996). Das Romani von Ajia Varvara: Deskriptive und historisch-vergleichende Darstellung eines Zigeunerdialektes. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon (1989). Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon (1993). Deriving cyclicity. In Sharon Hargus and Ellen M. Kaisse (eds), Studies in Lexical Phonology, pp. 75–110. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon (1995). The consequences of optimization for underspecification. In Eugene Buckley and Sabine Iatridou (eds), Proceedings of the 25th meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, pp. 287–302. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon (1998). The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: a case study from dominance. In Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Maarle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1997, pp. 121–55. Dordrecht: Kluwer. (p. 630) Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon (1999). Exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: representations versus the grammar. In René Kager, Harry van der Hulst, and Wim Zonnefeld (eds), The Prosody–Morphology Interface, pp. 134–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon (2011). The interaction between morphology and phonology. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan C. L. Yu (eds), Handbook of Phonological Theory 2nd edn, pp. 68–102. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon (to appear). The morphology–phonology connection. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon and Cemil Orhan Orgun (1995). Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish. Language, 71(4): 763–93.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon and Cemil Orhan Orgun (1998) Level (non)ordering in recursive morphology: evidence from Turkish. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari, and Patrick M. Farrell (eds), Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, pp. 360–92. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon and Cemil Orhan Orgun (2003). Turkish stress: a review. Phonology, 20: 139–61.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon and Cheryl Zoll (2005). Reduplication: Doubling in Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon and Cheryl Zoll (2007). Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics, 45(1): 133–71.Find this resource:

Itô, Junko (1988). Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. New York: Garland Publishing.Find this resource:

Itô, Junko and J. Hankamer (1989). Notes on monosyllabism in Turkish. Phonology at Santa Cruz 1. Santa Cruz: University of california, Santa Cruz, Syntax Research center.Find this resource:

Itô, Junko and R. Armin Mester (1999). The phonological lexicon. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.) The Handbook of Japanese linguistics, pp. 62–100. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Iverson, Gregory K. (1981) Rules, constraints, and paradigm lacunae. Glossa 15: 136–44.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray S. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language, 51(3): 639.Find this resource:

Jain, S., D. Osherson, J. Royer, A. Sharma, and S. Weinstein (1999). Systems that Learn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jakobson, Roman O. (1932). Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio Quinquagenario, 74–83.Find this resource:

Jakobson, Roman O. (1936 [1971]). Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du cercle Linguistique de Prague VI, pp. 240–99. Reprinted in Selected Writings (vol. II: Word and Language), pp. 23–71. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Jakobson, Roman O. (1939). Signe zéro. InMélanges de linguistique offerts à charles Bally, pp. 143–52. Geneva: Georg.Find this resource:

Jakobson Roman O. (1958). Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem. In American contributions to the Fourth International congress of Slavist, Moscow, pp. 127–56. ‘s-Gravenhage: Mouton.Find this resource:

Jamieson, Carole (1982). Conflated subsystems marking person and aspect in chiquihuatlan Mazatec. International Journal of American Linguistics, 48(2): 139–76.Find this resource:

Janda, Richard D. and Brian D. Joseph (1992). Pseudo-agglutinativity in Modern Greek verb-inflection and ‘elsewhere’. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 1, pp. 251–66. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. (p. 631) Find this resource:

Janse, Mark (2004). Animacy, definiteness, and case in cappadocian and other Asia Minor Greek dialects. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 5: 3–26.Find this resource:

Janse, Mark (2009). Watkins’ Law and the development of agglutinative inflections in Asia Minor Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 9: 93–109.Find this resource:

Janvin, C., D. Aarsland, J. P. Larsen, and K. Hugdahl (2003). Neuropsychological profile of patients with Parkinson’s disease without dementia. Dementia and Geriatric cognitive Disorders, 15(3), 126–31.Find this resource:

Janvin, C. C., J. P. Larsen, D. Aarsland, and K. Hugdahl (2006). Subtypes of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: progression to dementia. Movement Disorders, 21(9): 1343–9.Find this resource:

Jarema, G. (1998). The breakdown of morphology in aphasia: a cross-language perspective. In B. Stemmer and H. A. Whitaker (eds), Handbook of Neurolinguistics, pp. 221–34. San Diego, CA: Academic PressFind this resource:

Jarva, Vesa (2008). Old Helsinki Slang and language mixing. Journal of Language contact— VARIA 1: 52–80.Find this resource:

Jelinek, Eloise (1984). Empty categories, case and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2: 39–76.Find this resource:

Jensen, John (1974). A constraint on variable in phonology. Language, 50: 675–85.Find this resource:

Joanisse, M. F. and M. S. Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(13): 7592–97.Find this resource:

Joanisse, M. F. and M. S. Seidenberg (2003). Phonology and syntax in specific language impairment: evidence from a connectionist model. Brain and Language, 86: 40–56.Find this resource:

Jones, Daniel (1962). The Phoneme: Its Nature and Use, 3rd edn. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons.Find this resource:

Jörg, Christine (1989). Isländische Konjugationstabellen / Icelandic conjugation tables / Tableaux de conjugaison islandaise / Beygingatöflur Íslenskra Sagna. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Find this resource:

Jorgensen, Signe (2015). An acoustic analysis of three-level vowel length in Shilluk. Hons. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Find this resource:

Joseph, Brian D. and Richard D. Janda (eds) (2003). The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. London: Blackwell Publishers.Find this resource:

Joshi, Aravind (1985). How much context-sensitivity is necessary for characterizing structural descriptions. In David Dowty, Lauri Karttunen, and Arnold Zwicky (eds), Natural Language Processing: Theoretical, computational, and Psychological Perspectives, pp. 206–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Julien, Marit (2002). Syntactic Heads and Word Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kager, René (1996). On affix allomorphy and syllable counting. In Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology, pp. 155–71. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Find this resource:

Kager, René (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kahane, Sylvain (2003). The Meaning–Text Theory. In V. Agel, L. M. Eichinger, H.-W. Eroms, P. Hellwig, H. J. Heringer, and H. Lobin (eds), Dependency and Valency. An International Handbook of contemporary Research, vol. 1. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Kaisse, Ellen M. and April McMahon (2011). Lexical phonology and the lexical syndrome. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice (eds), The Blackwell companion to Phonology, vol. 4, pp. 2236–57. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell. (p. 632) Find this resource:

Kaisse, Ellen M. and Patricia A. Shaw (1985). On the theory of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 2: 1–30.Find this resource:

Kaplan, Aaron (2011). Harmonic improvement without candidate chains in Chamorro. Linguistic Inquiry, 42(4): 631–50.Find this resource:

Kaplan, Ronald M. and Martin Kay (1994). Regular models of phonological rule systems. Computational Linguistics, 20: 331–78.Find this resource:

Kapur, N., S. Barker, E. H. Burrows, D. Ellison, J. Brice, L. S. Illis, K. Scholey, C. Colbourn, B. Wilson, and M. Loates (1994). Herpes simplex encephalitis: Long termmagnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological profile. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 57(11): 1334–42.Find this resource:

Karlsson, Fred (1999). Finnish: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Karlsson, Fred (2006). Finnish as an agglutinating language. In Keith Brown (ed.), Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd edn, pp. 476–80. Oxford: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Karttunen, Lauri (2006). The insufficiency of paper-and-pencil linguistics: the case of Finnish prosody. In Miriam Butt, Mary Dalrymple, and Tracy Holloway King (eds), Intelligent Architectures: Variations on Themes by Ronald M. Kaplan. Stanford, CA:CSLI.Find this resource:

Kastovsky, Dieter (2006). Historical morphology from a typological point of view. Types of Variation: Diachronic, Dialectical and Typological Interfaces, 76: 53.Find this resource:

Katz, Dovid. (1987). Grammar of the Yiddish Language. London: Duckworth.Find this resource:

Kauchak, David and Regina Barzilay (2006). Paraphrasing for Automatic Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology conference of the NAAcL, Main conference, pp. 455–62, New York: Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Kay, Martin (1987). Nonconcatenative finite-state morphology. In Proceedings of the Third conference of the European chapter of the Association for computational Linguistics, pp. 2–10.Find this resource:

Kearns, Michael, and Umesh Vazirani (1994). An Introduction to computational Learning Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward and Matthew Dryer (2007). Passive in the world’s languages. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 1. clause Structure, 325–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Keller, Rudi (1989). Invisible-hand theory and language evolution. Lingua, 77(2): 113–27.Find this resource:

Kemmer, Suzanne (1993). The Middle Voice. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Kemper, T. (1994). Neuroanatomical and neuropathological changes during aging and dementia. In M. Albert and J. Knoefel (eds), Clinical Neurology of Aging. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kempler, D. and M. Goral (2008). Language and dementia: neuropsychological aspects. In M. McGroarty (ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 28, pp. 73-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kempler, D., S. Curtiss, and C. Jackson (1987). Syntactic preservation in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30: 343–50.Find this resource:

Kenstowicz, Michael J. (1983). Parametric variation and accent in the Arabic dialects. In Amy Chukerman, Mitchell Marks, and John F. Richardson (eds), Papers from the 19th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 205–13. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Find this resource:

Kenstowicz, Michael J. (1996). Base-identity and uniform exponence: alternatives to cyclic-ity. In Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks (eds), Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods, vol. 1, pp. 363–93. Manchester: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford. (p. 633) Find this resource:

Kenstowicz, Michael J. (2005). Paradigmatic uniformity and contrast. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen (eds), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, pp. 145–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kenstowicz, Michael J. and C. W. Kisseberth.(1979). Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Keri, S., O. Kelemen, G. Szekeres, N. Bagoczky, R. Erdelyi, A. Antal, G. Benedek, and Z. Janka (2000). Schizophrenics know more than they can tell: Probabilistic classification learning in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 30, 149–55.Find this resource:

Keri, S., C. Szlobodnyik, G. Benedek, Z. Janka, and J. Gadoros (2002). Probabilistic classification learning in Tourette syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 40(8), 1356–62.Find this resource:

Keshavan, M. S., H. A. Nasrallah, and R. Tandon (2011). Schizophrenia, ‘Just the Facts’ 6. Moving ahead with the schizophrenia concept: from the elephant to the mouse. Schizophrenia Research, 127(1–3) 3–13.Find this resource:

Ketrez, F. Nihan and Ayhan A. Aksu-Koç (2009). Early nominal morphology in Turkish: emergence of case and number. In Maria Voeikova and Ursula Stephany (eds), Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 15–48. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Key, H. H. (1967). Morphology of cayuvava. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Khan, Geoffrey (2004). The Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of Sulemaniyya and alabja. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Find this resource:

Khan, Geoffrey (2007). Grammatical borrowing in North-eastern Neo-Aramaic. In Yaron Matras and Jeanette Sakel (eds), Grammatical Borrowing in cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 197–214. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Kibrik, Aleksandr E. (1998). Archi. In Andrew Spencer and Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), Handbook of Morphology, pp. 455–76. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Kienast, T. and A. Heinz (2006). Dopamine and the diseased brain. CNS Neurological Disorders Drug Targets, 5(1): 109–31.Find this resource:

Killian, Donald and Harald Hammarström (2009). Notes on the Morphosyntax of Uduk (Koman, Sudan) from mss. sources. Ms.Find this resource:

Kim, Eun-Sook (2003) Theoretical Issues in Nuu-chah-nulth Phonology and Morphology. PhD thesis, University of British columbia.Find this resource:

Kim, Eun-Sook and D. Pulleyblank (2009). Glottalisation and lenition in Nuu-chah-nulth. Linguistic Inquiry, 40: 567–617.Find this resource:

Kim, Yuni (2008). Topics in the Phonology and Morphology of San Francisco del Mar Huave. PhD thesis, University of california, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Kim, Yuni (2010). Phonological and morphological conditions on affix order in Huave. Morphology, 20: 133–63.Find this resource:

Kimball, Geoffrey D. (1991). Koasati Grammar. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Find this resource:

Kinkade, M. Dale (1998). How much does a schwa weigh? In E. Czaykowska-Higgins and M. D. Kinkade (eds), Salish Languages and Linguistics: Theoretical and descriptive perspectives, pp. 197–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1965). Phonological change. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1968). Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Emmon Bach and Robert Harms (eds), Universals in Linguistic Theory, pp. 170–202. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (p. 634) Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1973). ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds), A festschrift for Morris Halle, pp. 93–106. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1974). Remarks on analogical change. In Historical Linguistics: Proceedings of the First International congress of Historical Linguistics, ed. by C. Jones and J. Anderson, pp. 257–76. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul. (1982a). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith (eds), The Structure of Phonological Representations, vol. 1, pp. 131–75. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1982b). Lexical phonology and morphology. In In-Seok Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning calm, pp. 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review, 17: 351–67.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (2005). Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, ed. by Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, pp. 113–35. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (2008a). Fenno-Swedish quantity: Contrast in stratal OT. In Bert Vaux and Andrew Nevins (eds), Rules, constraints, and Phonological Phenomena, pp. 185–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (2008b). Universals constrain change; change results in typological generalizations. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language change, pp. 23–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kiraz, George Anton (2000). Multitiered nonlinear morphology using multitape finite automata. Computational Linguistics, 26: 77–105.Find this resource:

Kirby, Simon (2001). Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. In IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary computation, vol. 5, pp. 102–10.Find this resource:

Kirby, Simon, Tom Griffiths, and Kenny Smith (2014). Iterated learning and the evolution of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 28: 108–14.Find this resource:

Kirchhoff, Katrin, Daniel Capurro, and Anne Turner (2012). Evaluating User Preferences in Machine Translation Using conjoint Analysis. In Proceedings of EAMT 2012, pp. 119–26. Trento, Italy.Find this resource:

Kirchner, Jesse S. (2007). The phonology of lexical underspecification. Ms., University of california, Santa Cruz, 26 May 2007.Find this resource:

Kirchner, Jesse S. (2010). Minimal Reduplication. PhD thesis, University of california, Santa Cruz.Find this resource:

Kirkwood, S. C., J. L. Su, P. M. Conneally, and T. Foroud (2001). Progression of symptoms in the early and middle stages of Huntington disease. Archives of Neurology, 58(2): 273–8.Find this resource:

Klamer, Marian (2005). Explaining some structural and semantic asymmetries in morphological typology. In Geert E. Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi, and Sergio Scalise (eds), Morphology and Linguistic Typology On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) catania, 21–23 September 2003.Find this resource:

Klein, Thomas B. (2000). Umlaut in Optimality Theory. A comparative analysis of German and Chamorro. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Klein, Thomas B. (2003). Syllable structure and lexical markedness in creole morphophonol-ogy: determiner allomorphy in Haitian and elsewhere. In Ingo Plag (ed.), The Phonology and Morphology of creole Languages, pp. 209–28. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Kleist, K. (1914). Aphasie und Geisteskrankheit. Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift, 61, 8–12. (p. 635) Find this resource:

Kobele, Gregory M. (2006). An investigation into structural identity in language and grammar. PhD thesis, UCLA.Find this resource:

Koch, Harold J. (1980). Kaititj nominal inflection: some comparative notes. In Bruce Rigsby and Peter Sutton (eds), Contributions to Australian Linguistics, pp. 259–74. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Koch, Harold J. (1994). The creation of morphological zeroes. Yearbook of Morphology, 31–71.Find this resource:

Koch, Harold J. (1996) Reconstruction in morphology. In Mark Durie and Malcom Ross (eds), The comparative Method Reviewed; Regularity and Irregularity in Language change, pp. 218–63. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Koch, Harold J. (2004). A methodological history of Australian linguistic classification. In Claire Bowern and Harold J. Koch (eds.), Australian languages: Classification and the comparative method, vol. 249, current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pp. 17–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp (2005). Europarl: A Parallel corpus for Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of MT Summit X.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp and Barry Haddow (2009). Interactive Assistance to Human Translators using Statistical Machine Translation Methods. In MT Summit XII.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp and Barry Haddow (2012a). Interpolated backoff for factored translation models. In Proceedings of AMTA.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp and Barry Haddow (2012b). Towards effective use of training data in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 317–21, Montréal, canada. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp and Hieu Hoang (2007). Factored Translation Models. In Proceedings of EMNLP.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp and Kevin Knight (2003). Empirical Methods for compound Splitting. In EAcL ‘03: Proceedings of the tenth conference on European chapter of the Association for computational Linguistics, pp. 187–93, Morristown, NJ. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp and Christof Monz (2006). Manual and automatic evaluation of machine translation between European languages. In Proceedings on the Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 102–21, New York. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp, Franz Josef Och, and Daniel Marcu (2003). Statistical phrase-based translation. In HLT/NAAcL.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp, Hieu Hoang, Alexandra Birch, Chris Callison-Burch, Marcello Federico, Nicola Bertoldi, Brooke Cowan, Wade Shen, Christine Moran, Richard Zens, Chris Dyer, Ondřej Bojar, Alexandra Constantin, and Evan Herbst (2007). Moses: Open Source Toolkit for Statistical Machine Translation. In AcL 2007, Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics companion Volume Proceedings of the Demo and Poster Sessions, pp. 177–80, Prague, Czech Republic. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp, Alexandra Birch, and Ralf Steinberger (2009). 462 Machine Translation Systems for Europe. In MT Summit XII.Find this resource:

Koehn, Philipp, Barry Haddow, Philip Williams, and Hieu Hoang (2010). More linguistic annotation for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and Metrics—MATR, WMT ‘10, pp. 115–20, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics. (p. 636) Find this resource:

Köpcke, Klaus-Michael (1998). The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: schemata versus rules. Journal of child Language, 25. 293–319.Find this resource:

Koskenniemi, Kimmo (1983). Two-Level Morphology: A General computational Model for Word-Form Recognition and Production. Publication 11, Department of General Linguistics. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.Find this resource:

Kossmann, Maarten (2007). Grammatical borrowing in Tasawaq. In Yaron Matras and Jeanette Sakel (eds), Grammatical Borrowing in cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 75-90. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Kossmann, Maarten (2008). On the nature of borrowing in cypriot Arabic, Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik 49: 5–24.Find this resource:

Kossmann, Maarten (2010). Parallel system borrowing: parallel morphological systems due to the borrowing of paradigms. Diachronica, 27/3: 459–87.Find this resource:

Kossmann, Maarten (2013). The Arabic Influence on Northern Berber. Leiden and Boston: E.J. Brill.Find this resource:

Krajewski, Grzegorz, Elena V. M. Lieven, and Anna L. Theakston (2012). Productivity of a Polish child’s inflectional noun morphology: a naturalistic study. Morphology, 22: 9–34.Find this resource:

Kramer, Christina E. (1999). Macedonian. A course for Beginning and Intermediate Students. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Find this resource:

Krifka, Manfred (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Ivan Sag and Anna Szabolcsi (eds), Lexical Matters, pp. 29–53. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Find this resource:

Krings, Hans P. and Geoffrey S. Koby (2001). Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes. Translation Studies. Kent State University Press. Translated (German into English) by Geoffrey Koby, Gregory Shreve, Katja Mischerikow, and Sarah Litzer.Find this resource:

Kroch, Anthony (1994). Morphosyntactic variation. In Katharine Beals et al. (eds), Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on variation and linguistic theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Find this resource:

Kučinskaitė, A. and K. Morkcnas (1964). Retos lietuvių kalbos tariamosios nuosakos formos [Rare forms of the conditional in Lithuanian.]. Mokslų akademijos darbai, 1(16): 313–18.Find this resource:

Kuhn, Roland, Boxing Chen, George Foster, and Evan Stratford (2010). Phrase clustering for smoothing TM probabilities: or, how to extract paraphrases from phrase tables. In Proceedings of the 23rd International conference on computational Linguistics, cOLING ‘10, pp. 608–16, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Kurimo, Mikko, A. Puurula, E. Arisoy, V. Siivola, T. Hirsimäki, J. Pylkkönen, T. Alumäe, and M. Saraclar (2006). Unlimited vocabulary speech recognition for agglutinative languages. In Proceedings of the Main conference on Human Language Technology conference of the North American chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 487–94, New York.Find this resource:

Kurisu, Kazutaka (2001). The phonology of morpheme realization. PhD thesis, University of california, Santa Cruz.Find this resource:

Kusters, Wouter (2003). Linguistic complexity. The influence of social change on verbal inflection. Utrecht: LOT.Find this resource:

Laaha, Sabine and Steven Gillis (2007). Typological Perspectives on the Acquisition of Noun and Verb Morphology. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics. (p. 637) Find this resource:

Laaha, Sabine, Dorit Ravind, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Gregor Laaha, and Wolfgang U. Dressler (2006). Early noun plurals in German: regularity, productivity or default? Journal of child Language, 33: 271–302.Find this resource:

Labov, William (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language, 83(2): 344–87.Find this resource:

Ladd, D. Robert, Bert Remijsen, and Caguor Adong Manyang (2009). On the distinction between regular and irregular inflectional morphology: evidence from Dinka. Language 85(3): 659–70.Find this resource:

Lahiri, Aditi (2003). Analogy, Levelling, Markedness: Principles of change in Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George (1986). Classifiers as a reflection of mind. In C. Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, pp. 13–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Lambert, Patrick, Holger Schwenk, Christophe Servan, and Sadaf Abdul-Rauf (2011). Investigations on translation model adaptation using monolingual data. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, WMT ‘11, pp. 284–93, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational LinguisticsFind this resource:

Langdon, Margaret (1970). A Grammar of Diegueño: The Mesa Grande dialect. Berkeley: University of california Press.Find this resource:

Lapointe, Steven G. (2001). Stem selection and OT. In Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1999, pp. 263–97. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Lass, Roger (1990). How to do things with junk: exaptation in language change. Journal of Linguistics, 26(1): 79–102.Find this resource:

Lee, Jennifer (1987). Tiwi Today: Study of language change in a contact situation. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Find this resource:

Legendre, Géraldine (2001). Morphological and prosodic alignment of Bulgarian clitics. In Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw, and Jeroen van de Weijer (eds), Optimality Theory: Syntax, Phonology, and Acquisition, pp. 219–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Legg, C., C. Penn, J. Temlett, and B. Sonnenberg (2005). Language skills of adolescents with tourette syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(1): 15–33.Find this resource:

Leonard, Janet and Claire K. Turner (2010). Predicting the shape of senćoten imperfectives. In A Festschrift for Thomas M. Hess on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, pp. 82–112. WA: Whatcom Museum Publication.Find this resource:

Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Levy, J. A. and G. J. Chelune (2007). Cognitive-behavioral profiles of neurodegenerative dementias: Beyond Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 20(4), 227–38.Find this resource:

Lewis, Geoffrey (1975 [1967]). Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Li, Ping and Yasuhiro Shirai (2000). The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Lichtenberk, Frantisek (2005). Inclusive-exclusive in Austronesian: An opposition of unequals. In Elena Filiminova (ed.), Clusivity. Typology and case studies of the inclusive– exclusive distinction, pp. 261–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Lichtenberk, Frantisek (2009). Attributive possession constructions in Oceanic. In William B. McGregor (ed.), The Expression of Possession, pp. 249–342. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Lieber, Rochelle (1980). On the organization of the lexicon. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, published by Indiana University Linguistics club, 1981. (p. 638) Find this resource:

Lieber, Rochelle (1984). Consonant gradation in Fula: an autosegmental approach. In Mark Aronoff and Richard Oehrle (eds), Language Sound Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lieber, Rochelle (1987). An Integrated Theory of Autosegmental Processes. Albany: State University of New York Press.Find this resource:

Lieber, Rochelle (1992). Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Lieven, Elena V. M., J. M. Pine, and D. Dressner Barnes (1992). Individual differences in early vocabular development: redefining the referential-expressive distinction. Journal of child Language, 19: 287–310.Find this resource:

Lieven, Elena V. M., J. M. Pine, and G. Baldwin (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of child Language, 24: 187–219.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, David (1991). How to Set Parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lin, Yen-Hwei (1997a). Cyclic and noncyclic affixation in Piro. In Geert E. Booij and Jeroen van deWeijer (eds), Phonology in Progress—Progress in Phonology, pp. 167–88. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Find this resource:

Lin, Yen-Hwei (1997b). Syllabic and moraic structures in Piro. Phonology, 14: 403–36.Find this resource:

Lin, Yen-Hwei (2005). Piro affricates: Phonological edge effects and phonetic anti-edge effects. In Marc van Oostendorp and Jeroen van deWeijer (eds), The Internal Organization of Phonological Segments. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Lindeman, Fredrik Otto (1987). Introduction to the ‘Laryngeal Theory’. Oslo: Norwegian University Press and The Institute for Comparative Research in Human culture.Find this resource:

Ling, Charles X. and Marin Marinov (1993). Answering the connectionist challenge: a symbolic model of learning the past tenses of english verbs. Cognition, 49(3): 235–90.Find this resource:

Liu, Yang, Qun Liu, and Shouxun Lin (2010). Discriminative word alignment by linear modeling. Computational Linguistics, 36(3): 303–39.Find this resource:

Longworth, C. E., S. E., Keenan, R. A., Barker,W. D., Marslen-Wilson, and L. K. Tyler (2005). The basal ganglia and rule-governed language use: evidence fromvascular and degenerative conditions. Brain, 128(3): 584–96.Find this resource:

Lopez, Adam (2008). Statistical Machine Translation. AcM computing Surveys, 40(3).Find this resource:

Luyster, R. J. and C. Lord (2009). Word learning in children with autism spectrum disorders. Developmental Psychology, 45(6): 1774–86.Find this resource:

Lyons, Christopher (1991). An agreement approach to clitic doubling. Transactions of the Philological Society, 88: 1–57.Find this resource:

MacBride, Alexander (2004). A constraint-based approach to morphology. PhD thesis, UcLA.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. (1979). Formal problems in semitic phonology and morphology. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. (1981). A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12: 373–418.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. (1998). Morpheme structure constraints and paradigm occultation. In M. Catherine Gruber, Derrick Higgins, Kenneth Olson, and Tamra Wysocki (eds), Papers from the 32nd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 2, pp. 123–50. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. (2000). The prosody of phase in Rotuman. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18: 147–97. (p. 639) Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. (2002). A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. (2005). Optimal paradigms. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen (eds), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, pp. 170–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. (2007). What is Optimality Theory? Language and Linguistics compass, 1(4): 260–91.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince (1986/1996). Prosodic morphology 1986. Technical Report 32, Rutgers University center for cognitive Science, 1996.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology. The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8: 209–83.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince (1993a). Prosodic morphology, constraint interaction and satisfaction. ROA 485-1201.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince (1993b). Generalized alignment. In Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1993, pp. 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. In Mercè Gonzàlez (eds) Proceedings of the 24th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, pp. 333–79. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Jill Beckman, Suzanne Urbanczyk, and Laura Walsh Dickey (eds), Papers in Optimality Theory (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18), pp. 249–384. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts.Find this resource:

McCauley, S. M. and M. H. Christiansen (2011). Learning simple statistics for language comprehension and production: the CAPPUcIONO model. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, and Shipley T. (eds), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual conference of the cognitive Science Society.Find this resource:

McClelland, James L. and Karalyn Patterson (2002a). Words or Rules cannot exploit the regularity in exceptions: Reply to Pinker and Ullman. Trends in cognitive Sciences, 6(11): 464–5.Find this resource:

McClelland, James L. and Karalyn Patterson (2002b). Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? Trends in cognitive Sciences, 6(11): 465–72.Find this resource:

McConvell, Patrick and Felicity Meakins (2005). Gurindji Kriol: a mixed language emerges from code-switching. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 25(1): 9–30.Find this resource:

McGregor, William B. (2002). Verb classification in Australian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

McIntosh, Mary (1984). Fulfulde Syntax and Verbal Morphology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Find this resource:

Mc Laughlin, Fiona. (1997). Noun classification in Wolof: when affixes are not renewed. Studies in African Linguistics, 26(1): 1–28.Find this resource:

Mc Laughlin, Fiona (2004). Is there an adjective class in Wolof? In R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 242–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Mc Laughlin, Fiona (2005). Reduplication and consonant mutation in the Northern Atlantic languages. In Bernd Hurch (ed.), Studies on Reduplication, pp. 111–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Mc Laughlin, Fiona (2011). Loanword behavior as window on consonant mutation. Paper presented at the Old World conference in Phonology (OcP8), Marrakesh. (p. 640) Find this resource:

McWhorter, John (2008). Inflectional morphology and Universal Grammar: Post hoc versus propter hoc. In Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger, and Tonjes Veenstra (eds), Variation, Selection, Development, vol. 197. pp. 337–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Madnani, Nitin (2010). The circle of Meaning: From Translation to Paraphrasing and Back. PhD thesis, University of Maryland college Park.Find this resource:

Madnani, Nitin and Bonnie J. Dorr (2010). Generating phrasal and sentential paraphrases: A survey of data-driven methods. Computational Linguistics, 36(3): 341–87.Find this resource:

Maiden, Martin (1992). Irregularity as a determinant of morphological change. Journal of Linguistics, 28: 285–312.Find this resource:

Maiden, Martin (2005). Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology 2004 pp. 137–75.Find this resource:

Maiden, Martin (2009). From pure phonology to pure morphology the reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 1: 45–82.Find this resource:

Maiden, Martin and Cecilia Robustelli (2000). A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian. London: Arnold.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (1982). Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, 13: 483–545.Find this resource:

Maratsos, Michael P. (2000). More overregularizations after all: new data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen, and Xu. Journal of child Language, 27: 183–212.Find this resource:

Maratsos, Michael P., Dana E. Fox, Judith A. Becker, and Mary A. Chalkley (1985). Semantic restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition, 19: 167–91.Find this resource:

Marchman, Virginia A. (1997). Children’s productivity in the English past tense: the role of frequency, phonology, and neighborhood structure. Cognitive Science, 21: 283–304.Find this resource:

Marchman, Virginia A., Elizabeth Bates, Antoinette Burkardt, and Amy B. Good (1991). Functional constraints of the acquisition of the passive: toward a model of the competence to perform. First Language, 11: 65–92.Find this resource:

Marcus, Gary F. (1995). Children’s overregularization of English plurals: a quantitative analysis. Journal of child Language, 22: 447–59.Find this resource:

Marcus, Gary F., Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, and Fei Xu (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in child Development, 57(4): 1–78.Find this resource:

Marsh, R., G. M. Alexander, M. G. Packard, H. Zhu, J. C. Wingard, G. Quackenbush, and B. S. Peterson (2004). Habit learning in Tourette Syndrome, a translational neuroscience approach to developmental psychopathology. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 1259–68.Find this resource:

Marsh, R., G. M. Alexander, M. G. Packard, H. Zhu, and B. S. Peterson (2005). Perceptual-motor skill learning in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, evidence for multiple procedural learning and memory systems. Neuropsychologia, 43: 1456–65.Find this resource:

Marshall, Chloe R. and Heather K. J. van der Lely (2006). A challenge to current models of past tense inflection: the impact of phonotactics. Cognition, 100(2): 302–20.Find this resource:

Marslen-Wilson, William and Lorraine K. Tyler (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in cognitive Sciences, 2(11): 428–435.Find this resource:

Martin, Grahame Clarence (2001). A Study of Time as Being According to the Keraakie People of Southwest Papua New Guinea. PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.Find this resource:

Martin, Jack (1994). Implications of plural reduplication, infixation and subtraction for Muskogean subgrouping. Anthropological Linguistics, 36: 27–55.Find this resource:

Martinet, André (1960). Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Armand Colin.Find this resource:

Marušič, L. Franc (2003). *aff-stem-ix: On discontinuous morphology. Ms. Stony Brook University. (p. 641) Find this resource:

Mascaró, Joan (1996). External allomorphy as emergence of the unmarked. In Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks (eds), Current Trends in Phonology: Models and methods, Vol. 2, pp. 473–83. Manchester: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford.Find this resource:

Mascaró, Joan (2007). External allomorphy and lexical representation. Linguistic Inquiry, 38 (4): 715–35.Find this resource:

Maslen, Robert J. C., Anna L. Theakston, Elena V. M. Lieven, and Michael Tomasello (2004). A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47: 1319–33.Find this resource:

Matras, Yaron (2009) Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Matteson, Esther (1965). The Piro (Arawakan) Language. Berkeley: University of california Press.Find this resource:

Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Matthews, P. H. (1991) Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Matusov, Evgeny, Gregor Leusch, Rafael E. Banchs, Nicola Bertoldi, Daniel Dechelotte, Marcello Federico, Muntsin Kolss, Young-Suk Lee, Jose B. Marino, Matthias Paulik, Salim Roukos, Holger Schwenk, and Hermann Ney (2008). System combination for Machine Translation of Spoken and Written Language. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 16(7):1222–37.Find this resource:

Mayrhofer, Manfred (1972). A Sanskrit Grammar [tr. by Gordon B. Ford, Jr.]. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Find this resource:

Megyesi, Beáta, Eva A. Csato, Bengt Dahlqvist, and Joakim Nivre (2010). The English-Swedish-Turkish Parallel Treebank. In Nicoletta Calzolari (conference chair), Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odjik, Stelios Piperidis, Mike Rosner, and Daniel Tapias (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREc’10), Valletta, Malta. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Find this resource:

Meillet, Antoine and Joseph Vendryès (1924). Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques. Paris: Édouard Champion.Find this resource:

Mel’čuk, Igor A. (1988). Dependency Syntax—Theory and Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Find this resource:

Mel’čuk, Igor A. (1993). The inflectional category of voice: towards a more rigorous definition. In Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky (eds), Causatives and Transitivity, pp. 1–46. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Mel’čuk, Igor A. (1996). Cours de morphologie générale. Vol. 3: Troisième partie: Moyens morphologiques. Quatrième partie: Syntactiques morphologiques. Montreal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Find this resource:

Mel’čuk, Igor A. (1997). Cours de morphologie générale. Vol. 4: Cinquième partie: Signes morphologique. Montreal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Find this resource:

Mel’čuk, Igor A. (2000). Morphological processes. In Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan, and Stavros Skopeteas (eds), Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-formation, pp. 523–35. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Mester, R. Armin (1994). The quantitative trochee in Latin. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12(1): 1–62.Find this resource:

Mettke, Heinz (1983). Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut. (p. 642) Find this resource:

Meunier, Fanny and William Marslen-Wilson (2004). Regularity and irregularity in French verbal inflection. Language and cognitive Processes, 19(4), 561–80.Find this resource:

Mielke, Jeff (2004). The emergence of distinctive features. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University.Find this resource:

Migdalski, Krzystof (2006). The Syntax of compound Tenses in Slavic. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Miller, Cynthia L. and Leoma G. Gilley (2001). Evidence for ergativity in Shilluk. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 22: 33–68.Find this resource:

Miller, Cynthia L. and Leoma G. Gilley (2007). Evidentiality and mirativity in Shilluk. In Mechthild Reh and Doris L. Payne (eds), Advances in Nilo-Saharan Linguistics: Proceedings of the 8th International Nilo-Saharan Linguistics colloquium, pp. 191–206. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Miller, Philip (1992). Clitics and constituents in Phrase Structure Grammar. New York: Garland Publications.Find this resource:

Mills, Ann E. 1985. The acquisition of German. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), Thee crosslinguis-tic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 1, pp. 141–254. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Find this resource:

Mink, J. W. (2006). Neurobiology of basal ganglia and Tourette syndrome: Basal ganglia circuits and thalamocortical outputs. Advances in Neurology, 99; 89–98.Find this resource:

Minshew, N. J. and G. Goldstein (2001). The pattern of intact and impaired memory functions in autism. Journal of child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 1095–101.Find this resource:

Mišeska Tomić, Olga (2006). The Balkan Sprachbund. Morpho-syntactic Features. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Find this resource:

Mithun, Marianne. (2001). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Mochihashi, Daichi, Takeshi Yamada, and Naonori Ueda (2009). Bayesian unsupervised word segmentation with nested Pitman-Yor language modeling. In Proceedings of the Joint conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the AcL and the 4th International Joint conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 1–Volume 1, AcL ‘09, pp. 100–8, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Molnar, R. (2001). Generalize and Sift as a Model of Inflection Acquisition. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Monachesi, P. (1999). A Lexical Approach to Italian cliticization. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Find this resource:

Mondon, Jean-François. (2009). The nature of homophony and its effects on diachrony and synchrony. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Montler, Timothy (1986). An outline of the morphology and phonology of Saanich, North Straits Salish. University of Montana.Find this resource:

Montler, Timothy and Heather K. Hardy (1988). Imperfective gemination in Alabama. International Journal of American Linguistics, 54: 399–415.Find this resource:

Moreton, Elliott (2004). Non-computable functions in Optimality Theory. In John J. McCarthy (ed.), Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader, pp. 141–64. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Moreton, Elliott and Katya Pertsova (2012). Pastry phonotactics: is phonological learning special? In Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of North East Linguistic Society (NELS). (p. 643) Find this resource:

Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, Raymond Bertram, Tuomo Häikiö, Robert Schreuder, and R. Harald Baayen (2004a). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and cognition, 30: 1271–78.Find this resource:

Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, Aleksandar Kostić, and R. Harald Baayen (2004b). Putting the bits together: An information-theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94: 1–18.Find this resource:

Mostofsky, S. H., M. C. Goldberg, R. J. Landa, and M. B. Denckla (2000). Evidence for a deficit in procedural learning in children and adolescents with autism: implications for cerebellar contribution. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6(7): 752–59.Find this resource:

Mourigh, Khalid (2015). A grammar of Ghomara Berber. PhD thesis, Leiden University.Find this resource:

Mous, Maarten (2003). The Making of a Mixed Language: The case of Ma’a/Mbugu. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Mudzingwa, Calisto (2010). Shona morphophonemics: repair strategies in Karanga and Zezuru. PhD thesis, University of British columbia.Find this resource:

Muegge, Uwe (2007). Controlled language: The next big thing in translation? Client Side News Magazine, 7(7): 21–4.Find this resource:

Mugdan, Joachim (1986). Was ist eigentlich ein Morphem? Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprach-wissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 39: 29–43.Find this resource:

Mugdan, Joachim (2011). On the origins of the termphoneme. Historiographia Linguistica 38: 85–110.Find this resource:

Müller, Gereon (2004). On decomposing inflection class features: Syncretism in Russian noun inflection. In Gereon Müller, Lutz Gunkel, and Gisela Zifonun (eds), Explorations in Nominal Inflection, pp. 189–227. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Müller, Gereon (2013). Review article on Deponency and Morphological Mismatches edited by Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown, and Andrew Hippisley. Word Structure, 6(1): 100–22.Find this resource:

Munro, Pamela (2005). Chickasaw. In Heather K. Hardy and Janine Scancarelli (eds), Native Languages of the Southeastern United States, pp. 114–56. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.Find this resource:

Munro, Pamela and Lynn Gordon (1982). Syntactic relations in Western Muskogean: A typological perspective. Language, 58(1): 81–115.Find this resource:

Murray, L. L. (2000). Spoken language production in Huntington’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(6), 1350–66.Find this resource:

Murray, L. L. (2008). Language and Parkinson’s disease. In M. McGroarty (ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (vol. 28: 113–27), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Mutonyi, Nasiombe (2000). Aspects of Bukusu Morphology and Phonology. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University.Find this resource:

Muysken, Pieter (1994). Media lengua. In Peter Bakker and Maarten Mous (eds), Mixed Languages. 15 case Studies in Language Intertwining. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Find this resource:

Myreeva, Anna N. (1964) Očerk govora učurskix ėvenkov. In Agnija V. Romanova and Anna N. Myreeva (eds), Očerki učurskogo, majskogo i tottinskogo govorov, pp. 6–74. Moscow and Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo ‘Nauka’.Find this resource:

Naba, Jean-claude (1994). Le Gulmancema: Essai de systèmatisation. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Find this resource:

Næss, Åshild (2007). Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Naigles, Letitia R. (2002). Form is easy, meaning is hard: resolving a paradox in early child language. Cognition, 86: 157–99. (p. 644) Find this resource:

Nakov, Preslav and Hwee Tou Ng (2011). Translating from morphologically complex languages: a paraphrase-based approach. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1, HLT ‘11, pp. 1298–307, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Napoli, Donna J. and Irene Vogel (1990). The conjugations of Italian. Italica, 479–502.Find this resource:

Naradowsky, Jason and Kristina Toutanova (2011). Unsupervised bilingual morpheme segmentation and alignment with context-rich hidden semi-Markov models. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1, HLT ‘11, pp. 895–904, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Narasimhan, Bhuvana (2005). Splitting the notion of ‘agent’: Case-marking in early child Hindi. Journal of child Language, 32: 787–803.Find this resource:

Narfafan, Sutriani (2009). Phonemic structure inventory: a phonological analysis of the Iha language. Thesis, State University of Papua, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.Find this resource:

Neary, D., J. S. Snowden, L. Gustafson, U. Passant, D. Stuss, S. Black, M. Freedman, A. Kertesz, P. H. Robert, M. Albert, K. Boone, B. L. Miller, J. Cummings, and D. F. Benson (1998). Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 51(6): 1546–54.Find this resource:

Nelson, Nicole Alice (2003). Assymmetric anchoring. PhD thesis, Rutgers University.Find this resource:

Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Nevins, Andrew (2011). Phonologically-conditioned allomorph selection. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice (eds), The Blackwell companion to Phonology, vol. 4, pp. 2357–82. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Nevis, Joel and Brian Joseph (1993). Wackernagel affixes: evidence from Balto-Slavic. Yearbook of Morphology 1992, pp. 93–111. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Newman, Paul (2000). The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Find this resource:

Newman, Stanley (1980). Functional changes in the Salish pronominal system. International Journal of American Linguistics, 46(3): 155–67.Find this resource:

Newport, Elissa and Richard Aslin (2004). Learning at a distance: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48(2): 127–62.Find this resource:

Newton, Brian (1964). An Arabic-Greek Dialect. In R. Austerliz (ed.), Papers in Memory of George C. Pappageotes. Supplement to Word, 20(3): 43–52.Find this resource:

Nguyen, ThuyLinh, Stephan Vogel, and Noah A. Smith (2010). Nonparametric word segmentation for machine translation. In Proceedings of the 23rd International conference on computational Linguistics, cOLING ‘10, pp. 815–23, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Nichols, Johanna (1992). Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Nida, Eugene (1948). The identification of morphemes. Language, 24: 414–41.Find this resource:

Nießen, Sonja and Hermann Ney (2001). Toward hierarchical models for statistical machine translation of inected languages. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Data-driven Methods in Machine Translation, pp 1–8. Morristown, NJ: Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Nießen, Sonja and Hermann Ney (2004). Statistical machine translation with scarce resources using morpho-syntactic information. Computational Linguistics, 30(2):181–204.Find this resource:

Nikiema, Emmanuel (1999). De la variation du déterminant /la/ dans les créoles haïtien et st-lucien. Lingua, 107(1): 69–93. (p. 645) Find this resource:

Nikolaeva, Irina and Maria S. Tolskaya (2001). A grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Niyogi, Partha (2006). The computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Find this resource:

Niyogi, Partha and Robert C. Berwick (1996). Learning from triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(1).Find this resource:

N.N. (1974a). I kunehu yan i haggan. Agana, Guam: Government of Guam, Department of Education.Find this resource:

N.N. (1974b). I Rai i halomtano’. Agana, Guam: Government of Guam, Department of Education.Find this resource:

Norbury, C. F., H. Griffiths, and K. Nation (2010). Sound before meaning: word learning in autistic disorders. Neuropsychologia, 48(14): 4012–19.Find this resource:

Nordlinger, Rachel (2010a). Verbal morphology in Murrinh-Patha: evidence for templates. Morphology 20(2): 321–41.Find this resource:

Nordlinger, Rachel (2010b). Agreement in Murrinh-Patha serial verbs. In Yvonne Treis and Rik De Busser (eds), Selected Papers from the 2009 conference of the Australian Linguistic Society <http://www.als.asn.au/proceedings/als2009/nordlinger.pdf>.

Nordlinger, Rachel (2011). Transitivity in Murrinh-Patha. Studies in Language, 35(3): 702–34.Find this resource:

Nordlinger, Rachel (2012). Number marking in the Daly languages (Australia). In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds), Proceedings of the LFG12 conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Nordlinger, Rachel and Patrick Caudal (2012). The tense, aspect and modality system in Murrinh-Patha. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32(1): 73–113.Find this resource:

Nordlinger, Rachel and Louisa Sadler (2004). Nominal tense in cross-linguistic perspective. Language, 80(4): 776–806.Find this resource:

Noyer, Rolf (1994). Mobile affixes in Huave: optimality and morphological wellformedness. In Erin Duncan, Donka Farkas, and Philip Spaelti (eds), Proceedings of the 12th West coast conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 67–82. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Nuechterlein, K. H., D. M. Barch, J. M. Gold, T. E. Goldberg, M. F. Green, and R. K. Heaton (2004). Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 72: 29–39.Find this resource:

Nyman, Martti (1986). Is the Paradigm Economy Principle relevant? Journal of Linguistics, 23: 251–67.Find this resource:

O’Brien, S. (2011). Cognitive Explorations of Translation: Eyes, Keys, Taps. Continuum Studies in Translation. London: Bloomsbury.Find this resource:

Och, Franz Josef and Hermann Ney (2003). A Systematic comparison of Various Statistical Alignment Models. Computational Linguistics, 29(1):19–51.Find this resource:

Ochs, Elinor (1982). Ergativity and word order in Samoan child language. Language, 58: 646–71.Find this resource:

Odden, David (2011). The representation of vowel length. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth V. Hume, and Keren Rice (eds), The Blackwell companion to Phonology, Vol 1: General issues and segmental phonology, pp. 465–90. London:Wiley Blackwell.Find this resource:

Oepen, Stephan, Erik Velldal, Jan Tore L?nning, Paul Meurer, Victoria Rosen, and Dan Flickinger (2007). Towards hybrid quality-oriented machine translation: on linguistics and probabilities in MT. In Proceedings of the 11th conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation (TMI-07), pp. 144–53, Skövde, Sweden. (p. 646) Find this resource:

Oflazer, Kemal and Ilknur Durgar El-Kahlout (2007). Exploring different representational units in English-to-Turkish statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, StatMT ‘07, pp. 25–32, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Ohala, John J. (1989). Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. In Leiv E. Breivik and Ernst H. Jahr (eds), Language change—contributions to the Study of its causes. Trends in Linguistics 43, pp. 173–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Ohala, John J. (2001). The phonetics of sound change. Phonology: Critical concepts in Linguistics, 4: 44.Find this resource:

Okita, Tsuyoshi and Andy Way (2010). Hierarchical Pitman–Yor language model for machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2010 International conference on Asian Language Processing, IALP ‘10, pp. 245–8, Washington, DC: IEEE computer Society.Find this resource:

Okita, Tsuyoshi and Andy Way (2011). Pitman–Yor process-based language models for machine translation. International Journal of Asian Language Processing, 21(2): 57–70.Find this resource:

Okoth-Okombo, Duncan (1982). Dholuo Morphophonemics in a Generative Framework. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Find this resource:

Onnis, L., M. Christiansen, N. Chater, and R. Gómez (2003). Reduction of uncertainty in human sequential learning: evidence fromartificial language learning. In Proceedings of The 25th Annual conference of the cognitive Science Society, pp. 886–91, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Orgun, Cemil Orhan (1996). Sign-based morphology and phonology: with special attention to Optimality Theory. PhD thesis, University of california, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Orgun, Cemil Orhan (1999). Sign-based morphology: a declarative theory of phonology– morphology interleaving. In Ben Hermans and Marc van Oostendorp (eds), The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory, pp. 247–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Orešnik, Janez and Magnus Pétursson. (1977). Quantity in modern Icelandic. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi, 92: 155–71.Find this resource:

Orsolini, Margherita and William Marslen-Wilson (1997). Universals in morphological representation: evidence from Italian. Language and cognitive Processes, 12: 1–47.Find this resource:

Orsolini, Margherita, Rachele Fanari, and Hugo Bowles (1998). Acquiring regular and irregular inflection in a language with verb classes. Language and cognitive Processes, 13: 425–64.Find this resource:

O’Shannessy, Carmel (2005). Light Warlpiri: A New Language. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 25(1): 31–57.Find this resource:

Osmon, D. C. and J. M. Smerz (2005). Neuropsychological evaluation in the diagnosis and treatment of Tourette’s syndrome. Behaviour Modification, 29(5): 746–83.Find this resource:

Ota, Mitsuhiko (2004). The learnability of a stratified phonological lexicon. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 20: 19–40.Find this resource:

Ottósson, Kjartan G. (1992). The Icelandic middle voice: the morphological and phonological development. PhD thesis, Lund University.Find this resource:

Owens, Jonathan (2001). Creole Arabic: the orphan of all orphans. Anthropological Linguistics, 43/3: 348–78.Find this resource:

Ozonova, Ajjana A. (2006). Modal’nye analitičeskie konstrukcii v Altajskom jazyke. Novosibirsk: Rossijskaja akademija nauk.Find this resource:

Pagel, Steve (2010). Spanisch in Asien und Ozeanien. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Find this resource:

Pakendorf, Brigitte (2009). Intensive contact and the copying of paradigms: An Ė ven dialect in contact with Sakha (Yakut). Journal of Language contact – VARIA, 2: 85–110. (p. 647) Find this resource:

Papineni, Kishore, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu (2002). BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In AcL 2002, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for computational Linguistics, pp. 311–18, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Partee, Barbara H., Alice Ter Meulen, and Robert E. Wall (1990). Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Kluwer Academic PressFind this resource:

Parton, Kristen and Kathleen McKeown (2010). MTerror detection for cross-lingual question answering. In Coling 2010: Posters, pp. 946–54, Beijing, China. Coling 2010 Organizing committee.Find this resource:

Paster, Mary (2005). Subcategorization vs. output optimization in syllable-counting allo-morphy. In John Alderete, Chung-Hye Han, and Alexei Kochetov (eds), Proceedings of the 24th West coast conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 326–33. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Find this resource:

Paster, Mary (2006). Phonological conditions on affixation. PhD thesis, University of california, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Paster, Mary (2007). Aspects of Maay phonology and morphology. Studies in African Linguistics, 35(1): 73–120.Find this resource:

Paster, Mary (2009). Explaining phonological conditions on affixation: evidence from suppletive allomorphy and affix ordering. Word Structure, 2: 18–47.Find this resource:

Pater, Joe (2000). Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology, 17(2): 237–74.Find this resource:

Pater, Joe (2001). Austronesian nasal substitution revisited. In Linda Lombardi (ed.), Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and representations, pp. 159–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Pater, Joe (2007). The locus of exceptionality: morpheme-specific phonology as constraint indexation. In Leah Bateman,Michael O’Keefe, Ehren Reilly, and Adam Werle (eds), Papers in Optimality Theory III (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 32), pp. 259–96. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts.Find this resource:

Pater, Joe (2010). Morpheme-specific phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. In Steve Parker (ed.) Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation, pp. 123–54. London: Equinox.Find this resource:

Patterson, K., M. A. Lambon Ralph, J. R. Hodges, and J. L. McClelland (2001). Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 39: 709–24.Find this resource:

Patterson, K., M. A. L. Ralph, E. Jefferies, A. Woollams, R. Jones, J. R. Hodges, and T. T. Rogers (2006). ‘Presemantic’ cognition in semantic dementia: six deficits in search of an explanation. Journal of cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2): 169–83.Find this resource:

Patz, Elizabeth (1991). Djabugay. In R. M. W. Dixon and Barry J. Blake (eds), The Handbook of Australian Languages, vol. 4, pp. 245–347. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Paul, Hermann (1989). Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Find this resource:

Pawley, Andrew (1966). The structure of Karam: a grammar of a New Guinea Highlands language. PhD thesis, University of Auckland.Find this resource:

Payne, John (2009). The English genitive and double case. Transactions of the Philological Society, 107:322–57.Find this resource:

Payne, John and Rodney Huddleston (2002). Nouns and noun phrases. In R. Huddleston and Geoffrey Pullum (eds), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, pp. 323–523. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (p. 648) Find this resource:

Payne, John and Rodney Huddleston (2012). Relatedness in periphrasis: a paradigm-based perspective. In Marina Chumakina and Greville G. Corbett (eds), Periphrasis: the Role of Syntax and Morphology in Paradigms, pp. 191–225. Oxford: The British Academy and Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Pearl, Lisa and Jeffrey Lidz (2009). When domain-general learning fails and when it succeeds: Identifying the contribution of domain specificity. Language Learning and Development, 5(4): 235–65.Find this resource:

Pelham, Sabra D. (2011). The input ambiguity hypothesis and case blindness: an account of cross-linguistic and intra-linguistic differences in case errors. Journal of child Language, 38: 235–72.Find this resource:

Penke, Martina and Marion Krause (2004). Regular and irregular inflectional morphology in German Williams syndrome. In S. Niedeggen-Bartke and J. Siegmüller (eds), Language Development and competence in Williams Syndrome, pp. 245–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Penke, Martina, Marion Krause, and Ulrike Janßen (1999). The representation of inflectional morphology: evidence from Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 68: 225–32.Find this resource:

Perez, Remedios L. G. (1975). Estera si Rai. Agana, Guam: Government of Guam, Department of Education.Find this resource:

Perez, Frank and Rogelio G. Faustino (1999).Mandidok yan mamfabulas na hemplon Guåhan. Hagåtña, Guam: Government of Guam, Department of Education.Find this resource:

Perfors, A., J. B. Tenenbaum, and T. Regier (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 118(3): 306–38.Find this resource:

Perovic, A., N. Modyanova, and K. Wexler (2012). Comprehension of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: a syntactic or pragmatic deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics, Epub, 1–23.Find this resource:

Pertsova, Katya (2005). How lexical conservatism can lead to paradigm gaps. Working Papers in Phonology 6 (UcLAWorking Papers in Linguistics 11): 13–38.Find this resource:

Pertsova, Katya (2011). Grounding systematic syncretism in learning. Linguistic Inquiry, 42(2): 225–66.Find this resource:

Perniola, Vito (1997). Pali grammar. Oxford: Pali Text Society.Find this resource:

Perry, John R. (2005). A Tajik Persian Reference Grammar. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Find this resource:

Peters, Ann M. (1997). Language typology, prosody, and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In The crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition: Expanding the contexts, pp. 135–97. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Phillips, Colin, Nina Kazanina, and Shani H. Abada (2005). ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3): 407–28.Find this resource:

Pihel, Kalju and Arno Pikamäe (eds) (1999). Soome-eesti sõnaraamat. Tallinn: Valgus.Find this resource:

Pike, Kenneth L. (1948). Tone Languages—A Technique for Determining the Number and Type of Pitch contrasts in a Language, with Studies in Phonemic Substitution and Fusion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven (1999). Words and Rules (Science Masters S.). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven and Alan Prince (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28: 73–193. (p. 649) Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven and Alan Prince (1990). Rules and connections in human language. In R. G. M. Morris (ed.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology, pp. 182–99. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven and Michael T. Ullman (2002a). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in cognitive Sciences, 6(11): 456–63.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven and Michael T. Ullman (2002b). Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue. Trends in cognitive Sciences, 6(11): 472–4.Find this resource:

Pitt, L. (1985). A characterization of probabilistic inference. 25th Annual Symposium on Foundations of computer Science, pp. 485–94. Singer Island, FL: IEEE computer Society Technical committee on the Mathematical Foundations of computing.Find this resource:

Pitt, L. and L. Valiant (1988). Computational limitations of learning from examples. The Journal of AcM, 35(4).Find this resource:

Plank, Frans (1981). Morpholoische (ir-)regularitäten. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

Plank, Frans (1995). (Re-)introducing suffixaufnahme. In Frans Plank (ed.), Double case, pp. 4–110. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Plitt, Mirko, and François Masselot (2010). A productivity test of statistical machine translation post-editing in a typical localisation context. In Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics—Special Issue on Open Source Machine Translation Tools (Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 93), pp. 7–16. Prague: Charles University.Find this resource:

Plunkett, Kim and Virginia Marchman (1993). From rote learning to system building— acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48(1): 21–69.Find this resource:

Podoll, K., P. Caspary, H. W. Lange, and J. Noth (1988). Language functions in Huntington’s disease. Brain, 111(6): 1475–503.Find this resource:

Poeppel, David and Kenneth Wexler (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69: 1–33.Find this resource:

Pollard, Carl J. and Ivan A. Sag (1994). Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Popel, Martin and David Mareček (2010). Perplexity of n-gram and dependency language models. In Petr Sojka, Aleš Horák, Ivan Kopeček, and Karel Pala (eds), Text, Speech and Dialogue. 13th International conference, TSD 2010, Brno, czech Republic, September 6– 10, 2010. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in computer Science, 6231), pp. 173–80. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer.Find this resource:

Popova, Gergana and Andrew Spencer (2013). Relatedness in periphrasis: a paradigm-based perspective. In Marina Chumakina and Greville G. Corbett (eds), Periphrasis: The Role of Syntax in Paradigms, pp. 191–225. Oxford: The British Academy and Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Prado, Elizabeth L. and Michael T. Ullman (2009). Can imageability help us draw the line between storage and composition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory, and cognition, 35(4): 849–66.Find this resource:

Prasada, Sandeep and Steven Pinker (1993). Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and cognitive Processes, 8(1): 1–56.Find this resource:

Press, Ian (1986). A Grammar of Modern Breton. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky (1993/2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar, Technical Report RuccS-TR-2/cU-cS-696-93, Rutgers center for cognitive Science, Rutgers University, and Department of cognitive Science, University of colorado at Boulder. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [ROA-537 (2002 version)]. (p. 650) Find this resource:

Pullman, Thomas (2004). The morphophonology of consonant mutations in Irish. Master’s thesis, University of Cambridge.Find this resource:

Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2007). The evolution of model-theoretic frameworks in linguistics. In James Rogers and Stephan Kepser (eds), Model-Theoretic Syntax at 10. Proceedings of the MTS@10 workshop, August 13–17, organized as part of ESSLLI 2007, the European Summer School on Logic, Language and Information, pp. 1–10. Dublin, Ireland: Trinity college Dublin.Find this resource:

Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Barbara C. Scholz (2001). On the distinction between model-theoretic and generative-enumerative syntactic frameworks. In Philippe de Groote, Glyn Morrill, and Christian Retoré (eds), Logical Aspects of computational Linguistics: 4th International conference (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2099), pp. 17–43. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Find this resource:

Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Hans-Jörg Tiede (2010). Inessential features and expressive power of descriptive metalanguages. In Anna Kibort and Greville Corbett (eds), Features: Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics, pp. 272–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Arnold Zwicky (1986). Phonological resolution of syntactic feature conflict. Language 62: 751–73.Find this resource:

Pullum, Geoffrey K. and Arnold Zwicky (1988). The syntax–phonology interface. In Frederick J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: I: Linguistic Theory: Foundations, pp. 255–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Pye, Clifton and P. Quixtan Poz (1988). Precocious passives and antipassives. Papers and Reports on child Language Development, 27: 71–80.Find this resource:

Raffelsiefen, Renate (2004). Absolute ill-formedness and other morphophonological effects. Phonology, 21: 91–142.Find this resource:

Raffelsiefen, Renate (2005). Paradigm uniformity effects versus boundary effects. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen (eds), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, pp. 211–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ragnarsdóttir, Hrafnildur, Hanne G. Simonsen, and Kim Plunkett (1999). The acquisition of past tense in Icelandic and Norwegian children: an experimental study. Journal of child Language, 577–618.Find this resource:

Ralli, Angela (2007). On the role of allomorphy in inflectional morphology: evidence from dialectal variation. In Giandomenico Sica (ed.), Open Problems in Linguistics and Lexicography. Milan: Polimetrica.Find this resource:

Ramanathan, Ananthakrishnan, Hansraj Chouhdary, Avishek Ghosh, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya (2009). Case markers and morphology: addressing the crux of the fluency problem in English-Hindi SMT. In Proceedings of the Joint conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the AcL and the 4th International Joint conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: vol. 2. AcL ‘09, pp. 800–8, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Ramos, Teresita V. (1971). Tagalog Structures. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Find this resource:

Rastorgueva, Vera S. and Aza A. Kerimova (1964) Sistema tadžikskogo glagola. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

Rebrus, Péter, and Miklós Törkenczy (2005). Uniformity and contrast in the Hungarian verbal paradigm. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen (eds), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, pp. 263–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Reh, Mechthild (1996). Anywa Language—Description and Internal Reconstructions. Nilo-Saharan 11. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag. (p. 651) Find this resource:

Reid, Nicholas. (1990). Ngan’gityemerri: a language of the Daly River region, Northern Territory of Australia. PhD thesis, Australian National University.Find this resource:

Reid, Nicholas (2003). Phrasal verb to synthetic verb: recorded morphosyntactic change in Ngan’gityemerri. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), The non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia, pp. 95-123.canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Reid, Tatiana (2009). Suprasegmentals in Shilluk nominal morphophonology. Undergraduate honours dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Find this resource:

Reiner, A., R. Albin, K. Anderson, C. D’amato, J. Penney, and A. Young (1988). Differential loss of striatal projection neurons in Huntington’s Disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 85: 5733–77.Find this resource:

Remijsen, Bert, Otto G. Ayoker, and Timothy Mills (2011). Shilluk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(1): 131–45.Find this resource:

Reuther, Ursula (2003). Two in one—can it work? Readability and translatability by means of controlled language. In Proceedings of the Joint conference combining the 8th International Workshop of the European Association for Machine Translation and the 4th controlled Language Applications Workshop (cLAW 2003), pp. 124–32, Dublin city University, Dublin, Ireland.Find this resource:

Rice, Curt (2003). Dialectal variation in Norwegian imperatives. Nordlyd, 31: 372–84.Find this resource:

Rice, Curt (2006). Norwegian stress and quantity: the implications of loanwords. Lingua, 116: 1171–94.Find this resource:

Rice, Curt (2007). Gaps and repairs at the phonology-morphology interface. Journal of Linguistics, 43: 197–221.Find this resource:

Rice, Curt and Sylvia Blaho (eds) (2009). Modeling Ungrammaticality in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.Find this resource:

Richards, B. J. and D. D. Malvern (2004). Investigating the validity of a new measure of lexical diversity for root and inflected forms. In K. Trott, S. Dobbinson, and P. Griffiths (eds), The child Language Reader, pp. 81–9. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Richardson, Stephen D., William B. Dolan, Arul Menezes, and Monica corston-Oliver (2001). Overcoming the customization Bottleneck Using Example-based MT. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Data-driven Methods in Machine Translation, pp. 1–8, Morristown, NJ: Association for computational Linguistics.Find this resource:

Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14(5): 465–71.Find this resource:

Rizzi, Luigi (1994). Early null subjects and root null subjects. In Barbara C. Lust, Gabriella Hermon, and Jacklin Kornfilt (eds), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition— crosslinguistic perspectives: Volume 2—Binding, dependencies, and learnability, pp. 249–72. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Find this resource:

Roark, Brian and Richard Sproat (2007). Computational Approaches to Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Roberts, J. A., M. L. Rice, and H. Tager-Flusberg (2004). Tense marking in children with autism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 429–44.Find this resource:

Robins, R. H. (1959). Nominal and verbal derivation in Sundanese. Lingua, 8: 337–69.Find this resource:

Rodríguez-Ponga, Rafael (2009). Del español al Chamorro. Lenguas en contacto en el Pacífico. Madrid: Ediciones Gondo.Find this resource:

Romero-Méndez, Rodrigo (2008). A reference grammar of Ayutla Mixe (Tukyo’m Ayuujk). PhD thesis, SUNY Buffalo. (p. 652) Find this resource:

Rosa, Rudolf, David Mareček, and Ondřej Dušek (2012). DEPFIX: A System for Automatic correction of czech MT Outputs. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 362–8, Montréal, canada. Association for computational LinguisticsFind this resource:

Rose, Sharon (2006). Chaha (gurage) morphology. In A. Ian S. Kaye (ed.), Morphologies of Asia and Africa, pp. 399–424. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Find this resource:

Rosenbach, Anette (2002). Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Ross, Malcolm D. (1996). Contact-induced change and the comparative method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. In Mark Durie and Malcolm D. Ross (eds), The comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language change, pp. 180–217. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ross, Malcolm D. (2001). Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages in northwest Melanesia. In Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in comparative Linguistics, pp. 134–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ross, Malcolm D. (2007). Calquing and metatypy. Journal of Language contact, 1: 116–43.Find this resource:

Rothstein, Robert A. (1993). Polish. In Bernard Comrie and Greville G. Corbett (eds), The Slavonic Languages, pp. 686–758. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Round, Erich. (2009). Kayardild phonology, morphology, and morphosyntax. PhD thesis, Yale University.Find this resource:

Rubach, Jerzy and Geert E. Booij (2001). Allomorphy in Optimality Theory: Polish iotation. Language, 77: 26–60.Find this resource:

Rubino, Carl (2005). Reduplication: form, function and distribution. In B. Hurch (ed.), Studies on Reduplication, pp. 11–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Rumelhart, Donald E. and James L. McClelland (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In James L. McClelland, Donald E. Rumelhart, and the PDP Research Group (eds), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of cognition, vol. 2, Psychological and Biological Models, pp. 216–71. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Find this resource:

Russel, Kevin (1999). MOT: Sketch of an OT approach to morphology. Ms., University of Manitoba, ROA-352-1099.Find this resource:

Ryan, Kevin (2010). Variable affix order: grammar and learning. Language, 86(4): 758–91.Find this resource:

Sadler, Louisa and Andrew Spencer (2001). Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. Yearbook of Morphology 2000, pp. 71–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Sadock, J. M. (1991). Autolexical Syntax: A Theory of Parallel Grammatical Representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Safford, William E. (1903). The Chamorro language of Guam. American Anthropologist, 5(3): 289–311.Find this resource:

Saffran, Jenny R. (2002). Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 47: 172–96.Find this resource:

Saffran, Jenny R., Richard N. Aslin, and Eli