Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 19 June 2019

(p. 547) References

(p. 547) References

Aarsleff, Hans (1970). ‘The history of linguistics and Professor Chomsky,’ Language, vol. 46, pp. 57–85.Find this resource:

Aarsleff, Hans (1971). ‘ “Cartesian linguistics”: History or fantasy?’ Language Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 1–12.Find this resource:

Abney, Steven P. (1987). ‘The English NP in its sentential aspect,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch O. (2006a). ‘Complementation in Saramaccan and Gungbe: The case of C-type modal particles,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 24, pp. 1–55.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch O. (2006b). ‘The role of the syntax-semantics interface in language transfer,’ in Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White, and Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis: Dialogues, pp. 221–252. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch O. (2009). ‘Competition and selection: That’s all!,’ in Enoch Aboh and Norval Smith (eds.), Complex process in new languages, pp. 317–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch O. (2010). ‘Event operator movement in factives: Some facts from Gungbe, Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 36, pp. 153–162.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch O. (2015) The emergence of hybrid grammars: Language contact and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch, and Michel DeGraff (2014). ‘Some notes on nominal phrases in Haitian Creole and in Gùngbè: A trans-Atlantic Sprachbund perspective,’ in Tor Åfarli and Brit Mæhlum (eds.), The sociolinguistics of grammar, pp. 203–236.Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch, and James Essegbey (eds.) (2010). Topics in Kwa syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Aboh, Enoch, and Norval Smith (eds.) (2009). Complex processes in new languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Abrahamsson, Niclas, and Kenneth Hyltenstam (2009). ‘Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny,’ Language Learning, vol. 59, pp. 24–06.Find this resource:

Ackema, Peter, and Ad Neeleman (2002). ‘Effects of short-term storage in processing rightward movement,’ in S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, and F. Wijnen (eds.) Storage and computation in the language faculty, pp. 219–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Adam, Lucien (1883). Les idiomes négro-aryen et maléo-aryen: Essai d’hybridologie linguistique. Paris: Maisonneuve.Find this resource:

Addessi, Elsa, Alessandra Mancini, Lara Crescimbene, Camillo Padoa-Schiopp, and Elisabetta Visalberghi (2008). ‘Preference transitivity & symbolic representation in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella),’ PLoS ONE 3. E2414.Find this resource:

Adger, David (2005). ‘Anaphor/agreement mismatches.’ Paper presented at the Stuttgart workshop on Reflexivity.Find this resource:

Adger, David (2010). ‘A Minimalist theory of feature structure,’ in Anna Kibort and Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics, pp. 185–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (p. 548) Find this resource:

Adger, David (2013). A syntax of substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Adger, David, and George Tsoulas (1999). ‘The syntax and semantics of Merge,’ in Patrick Sauzet (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Langues et Grammaire, Paris-8 Documents de Travail Languages et Grammaire, vol. 7, pp. 5–20.Find this resource:

Adjukiewicz, Kazimierz (1935). ‘Die syntaktische Konnexität,’ in Storrs McCall (ed.), Polish Logic 1920–1939, pp. 207–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Translated from Studia Philosophica, vol. 1, pp. 1–27.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou (1998). ‘Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP checking,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 16, pp. 49–39.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, Artemis, and Gisbert Fanselow (2002). ‘On the correlation between morphology and syntax: The case of V-to-I,’ in J. W. Zwart and W. Abraham (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic Syntax: Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 219–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman, and Melita Stavrou (2007). Noun Phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Allen, Cynthia (1995). Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Allen, Cynthia (2003). ‘Deflexion and the development of the genitive in English,’ English Language and Linguistics, vol. 7, pp. 1–28.Find this resource:

Alleyne, Mervyn C. (1969). ‘L’influence des dialectes régionaux français sur le créole français d’Haïti,’ Revue De Linguistique Romane, vol. 33, issue 131/132, pp. 254–269.Find this resource:

Alleyne, Mervyn C. (1971). ‘Acculturation and the cultural matrix of creolization,’ in Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, pp. 169–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Alleyne, Mervyn C. (1980). Comparative Afro-American: A historical-comparative study of English-based Afro-American dialects of the New World. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Find this resource:

Andersen, Henning (1973). ‘Abductive and deductive change,’ Language, vol. 49, pp. 765–793.Find this resource:

Andersen, Henning (2006). ‘Synchrony, diachrony and evolution,’ in O. Nedergaard Thomsen (ed.), Competing models of linguistic change: Evolution and beyond, pp. 59–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Anderson, Janet (1983). ‘The difficulties of English syllable structure for Chinese ESL learners,’ Language Learning and Communication, vol. 2, pp. 53–61.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1977). ‘On mechanisms by which languages become ergative,’ in C. N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, pp. 317–363. Austin: University of Texas Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (1980). ‘On the development of morphology from syntax,’ in J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, pp. 51–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R. (2004). Dr. Dolittle’s delusion: Animals & the uniqueness of human language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Find this resource:

Anderson, Stephen R., and David W. Lightfoot (2002). The language organ: Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Angluin, Dana (1980). ‘Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data,’ Information and control, vol. 45, pp. 117–135.Find this resource:

Anonymous (1811). Idylles et Chansons, ou Essais de Poësie Créole par un Habitant d’Hayti. Philadelphia: J. Edwards.Find this resource:

Aoun, Joseph, and David W. Lightfoot (1984). ‘Government and contraction,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 15, pp. 46–73. (p. 549) Find this resource:

Archibald, John (ed.) (2000). Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Archibald, L. M. D., and S. E. Gathercole (2006). ‘Short-term and working memory in specific language impairment,’ International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, vol. 41, pp. 675–694.Find this resource:

Armon-Lotem, S. (2012). ‘Introduction: Bilingual children with SLI—the nature of the problem,’ Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 15, pp. 1–4.Find this resource:

Arnauld, A., and C. Lancelot (1660/1676/1966). Grammaire générale et raisonnée ou La Grammaire de Port Royal. Grammatica Universalis, I. Stuttgart Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Find this resource:

Arnold, Jennifer E., Thomas Wasow, Anthony Losongco, and Ryan Ginstrom (2000). ‘Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering,’ Language, vol. 76, pp. 2–5.Find this resource:

Arnold, Kate, and Klaus Zuberbühler (2006). ‘Language evolution: Semantic combinations in primate calls,’ Nature, vol. 441, p. 303.Find this resource:

Arnold, Kate, and Klaus Zuberbuhler (2008). ‘Meaningful call combinations in a non-human primate,’ Current Biology, vol. 18, pp. R202–R203.Find this resource:

Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol A. Padden, and Wendy Sandler (2008). ‘The roots of linguistic organization in a new language,’ Interaction Studies, vol. 9, pp. 133–153.Find this resource:

Arpaly, N. (2003). Unprincipled virtue: An inquiry into moral agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Arregi, K., and A. Nevins (2012). Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spell-out. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Arvaniti, A., and Brian Joseph (2000). ‘Variation in voiced stop prenasalization in Greek,’ Glossologia, vols. 11–12, pp. 131–166.Find this resource:

Asher, R. E., and J. M. Y. Simpson (1994) ‘Whistled speech and whistled language,’ in Ron Asher (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, pp. 573–576. Oxford: Pergamon.Find this resource:

Avolonto, Aimé. (1992). ‘Les particules modales en fongbe et la nature de INFL dans les phrases injonctives,’ MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 17, pp. 1–25.Find this resource:

Avrutin, S. (1999). Development of the syntax–discourse interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

Avrutin, S. (2004). ‘Optionality in child and aphasic speech,’ Lingue e Linguaggio, vol. 1, pp. 67–89.Find this resource:

Avrutin, S. (2006). ‘Weak syntax,’ in Y. Grodzinsky and K. Amunts (eds.), Broca’s region, pp. 49–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Axel, Katrin (2007). Studies on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb second. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Babyonyshev, M., and S. Marin (2005). ‘The acquisition of object clitics in Romanian,’ in R. S. Gess, and E. J. Rubin (eds.), Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bach, Emmon (1976). ‘An extension of classical transformational grammar,’ in Jerrold M. Sadock et al. (eds.), Problems of linguistic metatheory (proceedings of the 1976 conference), pp. 183–224. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Find this resource:

Back, Michael (1978). Die sassanidischen Staatsinschriften. Leiden: Brill.Find this resource:

Bacovcin, Hezekiah Akiva (2013). ‘Modeling interactions in morphosyntactic changes.’ Paper presented at the 15th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference, University of Ottawa, http://artsites.uottawa.ca/digs15/doc/Bacovcin_slides.pdf. (p. 550) Find this resource:

Bailey, Charles-James (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Find this resource:

Baker, Carl Lee (1978). Introduction to generative transformational syntax. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Find this resource:

Baker, Carl Lee (1991). ‘The syntax of English not: The limits of core grammar,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 22, pp. 387–429.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (1985). ‘The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 16, pp. 373–416.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (1989). ‘Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 20, pp. 513–553.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (1996). The Polysynthesis Parameter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2001). The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2003). Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2008a). The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2008b). ‘The macroparameter in a microparametric world,’ in Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, pp. 351–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2010). ‘Formal Generative Typology,’ in Berndt Heine and Heike Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, pp. 285–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2011a). ‘On the syntax of surface adjacency: The case of pseudo noun incorporation.’ Paper presented at the Workshop on Syntax-Semantics Interfaces. Academia Sinica, Taipei.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C. (2011b). ‘The interplay between Universal Grammar, universals and lineage specificity,’ Linguistic Typology, vol. 15, pp. 473–482.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark C., and James McCloskey (2007). ‘On the relationship of typology to theoretical syntax,’ Linguistic Typology, vol. 11, pp. 273–284.Find this resource:

Bakker, Peter (2003). ‘Pidgin inflectional morphology and its implications for creole morphology.’ in Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2002, pp. 3–33. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall, and Ingo Plag (2011). ‘Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles,’ Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, vol. 26, pp. 5–42.Find this resource:

Balari, S., and G. Lorenzo (2015). ‘Should it stay or should it go? A critical reflection on the critical period for language,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 9, pp. 8–42.Find this resource:

Baldwin, Thomas (1979). ‘Intepretations of Quantifiers,’ Mind, vol. 88, pp. 215–240.Find this resource:

Barbosa, Pilar (1995). ‘Null subjects,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Barbosa, Pilar (2009). ‘Two kinds of subject pro,’ Studia Linguistica, vol. 63 (special issue on partial pro-drop, ed. by Anders Holmberg), pp. 2–58.Find this resource:

Barceló-Coblijn, L., A. Benítez-Burraco, and A. Irurtzun (2015). ‘Syntactic networks as an endophenotype of developmental language disorders: An evo-devo approach to clinical linguistics,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 9, pp. 43–49.Find this resource:

Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (1953). ‘A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic description,’ Language, vol. 29, pp. 47–58. (p. 551) Find this resource:

Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (1954). ‘Logical syntax and semantics,’ Language, vol. 30, pp. 230–237.Find this resource:

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Baron-Cohen, S. (2008). ‘Autism, hyper-systemizing and truth.’ Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 64–75.Find this resource:

Baron-Cohen, S., E. Ashwin, D. Ashwin, T. Tavassoli, and B. Chakrabarti (2009). ‘Talent in autism: Hyper-systemizing, hyper-attention to detail and sensory hypersensitivity,’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 364, pp. 1377–1383.Find this resource:

Barrie, Michael and Y.-H. Audrey Li. (2015). ‘Analysis vs. synthesis: Objects,’ in Y.-H. Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson, and W.-T. Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 179–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bastiaanse, R., G. Bouma, and W. Post (2009). ‘Linguistic complexity and frequency in agrammatic speech production,’ Brain and Language, vol. 109, pp. 18–28.Find this resource:

Bates, Elizabeth, and Brian MacWhinney (1989). ‘Functionalism and the competition model,’ in Brian MacWhinney and Elizabeth Bates (eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, pp. 3–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Beghelli, Felipe, and Tim Stowell (1997). ‘Distributivity and negation: The syntax of each and every,’ in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of scope taking, pp. 71–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Find this resource:

Belikova, Alyona, and Lydia White (2009).‘Evidence for the fundamental difference hypothesis or not?’ Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 31, pp. 199–223.Find this resource:

Belletti, Adriana (1990). Generalized verb movement. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Find this resource:

Belletti, Adriana, and Maria Teresa Guasti (2015). The acquisition of Italian: Morphosyntax and its interfaces in different modes of acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi (1988). ‘Psych-verbs and θ-Theory,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 6, pp. 291–352.Find this resource:

Bellugi, Ursula (1971). ‘Simplification in children’s language,’ in R. Huxley and E. Ingram (eds.), Language acquisition: Models and methods. London: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Bellugi, U., E. Klima, and P. Siple (1975). ‘Remembering in signs.’ Cognition, vol. 3, pp. 93–125.Find this resource:

Benedicto, E., and Brentari, D. (2004). ‘Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 22, pp. 743–810.Find this resource:

Benítez-Burraco, A. (2013). ‘Genetics of language: Roots of specific language deficits,’ in C. Boeckx and K. K. Grohmann (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics, pp. 375–412. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Benítez-Burraco, A., and C. Boeckx (2014). ‘Universal Grammar and biological variation: An EvoDevo agenda for comparative biolinguistics,’ Biological Theory vol. 9, pp. 122–134.Find this resource:

Bernstein, Judy. (2001). ‘The DP hypothesis: identifying clausal properties in the nominal domain,’ in Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, pp. 536–561. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bernstein, Leonard (1976). The unanswered question: Six talks at Harvard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Bertolo, Stefano (1995a). ‘Learnability properties of parametric models for natural language acquisition,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.Find this resource:

Bertolo, Stefano (1995b). ‘Learnability and maturation in parametric systems,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 4, pp. 277–318.Find this resource:

Berwick, Robert C. (1982). ‘Locality principles and the acquisition of syntactic knowledge,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (p. 552) Find this resource:

Berwick, Robert C. (1985). The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Berwick, Robert C., and Noam Chomsky (2011). ‘The biolinguistic program: The current state of its development,’ in Anna-Maria Di Sciullo and Cedric Boeckx (eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise, pp. 19–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Berwick, Robert C., and Noam Chomsky (2016). Why only us: Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Berwick, Robert C., Angela Frederici, Noam Chomsky, and Johan J. Bolhuis (2013). ‘Evolution, brain, and the nature of language,’ Trends in Cognitive Science, vol. 17, pp. 89–98.Find this resource:

Berwick, Robert C., K. Okanoya, G. J. L. Beckers, and Johan J. Bolhuis (2011). ‘Songs to syntax: The linguistics of birdsong,’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 113–121.Find this resource:

Berwick, Robert C., Paul Pietroski, Beracah Yankama, and Noam Chomsky (2011). ‘Poverty of the stimulus revisited,’ Cognitive Science, vol. 35, pp. 1207–1242.Find this resource:

Berwick, Robert C., and Amy Weinberg (1984). The grammatical basis of linguistic performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Berwick, Robert C., and Amy Weinberg (1985). ‘Deterministic parsing and linguistic explanation,’ Language and Cognitive Processes, vol. 1, pp. 109–134.Find this resource:

Bever, Thomas G. (1970). ‘The cognitive basis for linguistic structures,’ in John R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the development of language, pp. 227–360. New York: Wiley.Find this resource:

Bever, Thomas G. (1975). ‘Functional explanations require independently motivated functional theories,’ in Robin E. Grossman, L. James San, and Timothy J. Vance (eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism, pp. 580–635. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Find this resource:

Bever, Thomas G. (2003). ‘Deconstructing functionalist explanations of linguistic universals,’ in Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, and MaryAnn Willie (eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar: In honor of Eloise Jelinek, pp. 333–351. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bhatia, Tej K. (1993). Punjabi: A cognitive-descriptive grammar. London: Routledge Descriptive Grammar Series.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa (ed.) (2008). The limits of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa (2011). ‘In defence of lexico-centric parametric variation: Two 3rd factor-constrained case studies.’ Paper presented at the Workshop on Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation: Rethinking Parameters (Madrid).Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa (2015). ‘The limits of syntactic variation: An emergentist generative perspective.’ Paper presented at the Workshop on Linguistic Variation and Change and Cultural Evolution, University of York.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, and Ian Roberts (2014). ‘A Syntactic Universal and its consequences,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 45, pp. 169–225.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, and Michelle Sheehan (2010). Parametric variation: Null subjects in Minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, and Michelle Sheehan (2014). ‘Complexity in comparative syntax: The view form modern parametric theory,’ in Frederick Newmeyer and Laurel Preston (eds.), Measuring linguistic complexity, pp. 103–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, Glenda Newton, and Michelle Sheehan (2009). ‘Limiting synchronic and diachronic variation and change: The Final-over-Final-Constraint,’ Language and Linguistics, vol. 10, pp. 701–743.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Marc Richards (2006). ‘True optionality: When the grammar doesn’t mind,’ in C. Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist theorizing, pp. 35–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (p. 553) Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2005). ‘Changing EPP-parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change,’ English Language and Linguistics, vol. 9, pp. 5–46.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2006). ‘The Loss of residual “head-final” orders and remnant fronting in Late Middle English: Causes and consequences,’ in J. M. Hartmann and L. Molnarfi (eds.), Comparative studies in Germanic syntax: From Afrikaans to Zurich German, pp. 263–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2008). ‘Cascading parameter changes: Internally-driven change in Middle and Early Modern English,’ in T. Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, pp. 79–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2009). ‘The return of the Subset Principle,’ in Paola Crisma and Giuseppe Longobardi (eds.), Historical linguistics and linguistic theory, pp. 58–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2010). ‘Subjects, Tense and verb-movement,’ in Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, and Michelle Sheehan Parametric variation: Null subjects in Minimalist theory, pp. 263–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2013). ‘Emergent parameters: Hierarchies and phylogenies.’ Paper presented at the international workshop Advances in Phylogenetic Linguistics, Ragusa Ibla, Italy, July 15–17, 2013.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2014). ‘Contrastive hierarchies in phonology and syntax: The role of third factors (or: why phonology is not different),’ manuscript, University of Cambridge.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2015a). ‘Rethinking formal hierarchies: A proposed unification,’ in James Chancharu, Xuhui Hu, and Moreno Mitrović (eds.), Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, vol. 7, pp. 1–31.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2015b). ‘Clausal hierarchies,’ in Ur Shlonsky (ed.), Beyond functional sequence, pp. 295–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (2015c). ‘Emergent parameters and syntactic complexity: new perspectives,’ talk given at the Trondheim Complexity Workshop, Trondheim, Norway.Find this resource:

Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts (in press). ‘Conditional inversion and types of parametric change,’ in Bettelou Los and Piter de Haan (eds.), Verb-second languages: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthazar (2007). ‘Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments,’ Linguistic Typology, vol. 11, pp. 239–251.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (1981). Roots of language. Ann Harbor MI: Karoma.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (1984). ‘The language bioprogram hypothesis,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 7, pp. 173–203.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (1988). ‘Creole languages and the Bioprogram,’ in Frederick Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Volume 2, pp. 268–284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (1990). Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (1996). ‘The origins of variations in Guyanese,’ in Gregogy Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin, and John Baugh (eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov, pp. 311–327. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (1999). ‘How to acquire language without positive evidence: What acquisitionists can learn from Creoles,’ in Michel DeGraff (ed.) Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development, pp. 49–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (p. 554) Find this resource:

Bickerton, Derek (2008). Bastard tongues: A trail-blazing linguist finds clues to our common humanity in the world’s lowliest languages. New York: Hill and Wang.Find this resource:

Biggs, A. (2014). ‘Dissociating case from theta-roles: A comparative investigation,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Find this resource:

Biro, Dora, and Tetsuro Matsuzawa (1999). ‘Numerical ordering in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Planning, executing, & monitoring,’ Journal of Comparative Psychology, vol. 113, pp. 178–185.Find this resource:

Bishop, D. V. M. (1990). ‘Handedness, clumsiness and developmental language disorders,’ Neuropsychologia, vol. 28, pp. 681–690.Find this resource:

Bishop, D. V. M. (2002). ‘The role of genes in the etiology of specific language impairment,’ Journal of Communication Disorders, vol. 35, pp. 311–328.Find this resource:

Bishop, D. V. M., and C. Adams (1989). ‘Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder, II: What features lead to a judgement of inappropriacy?’ British Journal of Disorders of Communication, vol. 24, vol. 241–263.Find this resource:

Bishop D. V. M., C. Adams, and C. F. Norbury (2006). ‘Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short-term memory deficits: Evidence from 6-year-old twins,’ Genes, Brain and Behavior, vol. 5, pp. 158–169.Find this resource:

Bishop, D. V. M., P. Bright, C. James, and H. K. J. van der Lely (2000). ‘Grammatical SLI: A distinct subtype of developmental language disorder?’ Applied Psycholinguistics, vol. 21, pp. 159–181.Find this resource:

Blacking, J. (1976) How musical is man? London: Faber.Find this resource:

Blacking, J. (1995) Music, Culture and Experience. University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette (1995). ‘The syllable in phonological theory,’ in John Goldsmith (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory, pp. 206–244. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette (2006a). ‘A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology,’ Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 32, pp. 117–166.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette (2006b). ‘Reply to commentaries,’ Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 32, pp. 245–256.Find this resource:

Blevins, Juliette, and Andrew Garrett (1998). ‘The origins of consonant-vowel metathesis,’ Language, vol. 74, pp. 508–556.Find this resource:

Bley-Vroman, Robert (1990). ‘The logical problem of foreign language learning,’ Linguistic Analysis, vol. 20, pp. 3–49.Find this resource:

Bloomfield, Leonard (1933). Language. New York: H. Holt and Company.Find this resource:

Blust, Robert (2004). ‘Austronesian nasal substitution: A survey,’ Oceanic Linguistics, vol. 43, pp. 73–148.Find this resource:

Boas, Franz (1911). Handbook of American Indian languages, Volume 1. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 40. Washington: Government Printing Office.Find this resource:

Bobaljik, Jonathan (2002). ‘Realizing Germanic inflection: Why morphology does not drive syntax,’ Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, special issue on Lexical Integrity, edited by Peter Ackema and Ad Neeleman, vol. 6, pp. 129–167.Find this resource:

Bobaljik, Jonathan, and Höskuldur Thráinsson (1998). ‘Two heads aren’t always better than one,’ Syntax, vol. 1, pp. 37–71.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2006). Linguistic minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2009a). ‘On the nature of merge,’ Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Juan Uriagereka, and Pello Salaburu (eds.), Of minds and language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, pp. 44–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2009b). ‘Language universals: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow,’ in Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Juan Uriagereka, and Pello Salaburu (eds.), Of minds and language: (p. 555) A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country, pp. 195–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric, and Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini (2005). ‘Language as a natural object, linguistics as a natural science,’ The Linguistic Review, vol. 22, pp. 447–466.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric, Andrew Carnie, and David Medeiros (2005). ‘Some consequences of natural law in syntactic structure.’ Manuscript, University of Arizona and Harvard University.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2010). Language in cognition: Uncovering mental structures and the rules behind them. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2011a). ‘Approaching parameters from below,’ in Anna-Maria Di Sciullo and Cedric Boeckx (eds.), Biolinguistic approaches to language evolution and variation, pp. 205–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2011b). ‘Some reflections on Darwin’s problem in the context of Cartesian biolinguistics,’ in Anna-Maria Di Sciullo and Cedric Boeckx (eds.), The biolinguistics enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution & nature of the human language faculty, pp. 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2011c). The Oxford handbook of linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2013). ‘Biolinguistics: Forays into human cognitive biology,’ Journal of Anthropological Sciences, vol. 91, pp. 1–28.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric (2014). ‘What Principles and Parameters got wrong,’ in C. Picallo (ed.), Linguistic variation in a Minimalist framework, pp. 155–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann (2007a). ‘The Biolinguistics manifesto,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 1, pp. 1–8.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann (2007b). ‘Putting phases in perspective,’ Syntax, vol. 10, pp. 204–222.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann (eds.) (2013). The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Boeckx, Cedric, Norbert Hornstein, and Jairo Nunes (2010). Control as Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bogen, J., and J. Woodward (1988) ‘Saving the phenomena,’ Philosophical Review, vol. 97, pp. 3–25.Find this resource:

Bohnacker, Ute (2004). ‘Nominal phrases,’ in G. Josefsson, C. Platzack, and G. Håkansson (eds.), The acquisition of Swedish grammar, pp. 195–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bopp, Franz (1816). Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache. Frankfurt am Main: Andreäische Buchhandlung.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (1984). Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (2005). Structuring sense, Vols. I & II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit, and Kenneth Wexler (1987). ‘The maturation of syntax,’ in Tom Roeper and Edwin Williams (eds.), Parameter setting, pp. 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit, and Kenneth Wexler (1992). ‘Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 10, pp. 147–189.Find this resource:

Bornkessel, Ina, Matthias Schlesewsky, and Angela Friederici (2002). ‘Grammar overrides frequency: Evidence from the on-line processing of flexible word order,’ Cognition, vol. 8, pp. B21–30.Find this resource:

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Matthias Schlesewsky, Steven L. Small, and Josef P. Rauschecker (2015). ‘Neurobiological roots of language in primate audition: common computational properties,’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 19, pp. 142–150. (p. 556) Find this resource:

Bortolussi, Luca, Giuseppe Longobardi, Cristina Guardiano, and Andrea Sgarro (2011). ‘How many possible languages are there?’ In Gemma Bel-Enguix, Verónica Dahl, and Maria Dolores Jiménez-López (eds.), Biology, Computation and Linguistics, 168–179. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Find this resource:

Bošković, Želko (1995). ‘Case properties of clauses and the greed principle,’ Studia Linguistica, vol. 49, pp. 32–53.Find this resource:

Bošković, Želko (2002). ‘On multiple wh-fronting,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 33, pp. 351–383.Find this resource:

Bošković, Želko (2008). ‘What will you have, DP or NP?’ In E. Elfner and M. Walkow (eds.) Proceedings of 37th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, pp. 101–114. GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Find this resource:

Bott, L., and I. A. Noveck (2004). ‘Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences,’ Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 51, pp. 437–457.Find this resource:

Bouchard, Denis (1996). ‘Sign languages and language universals: The status of order and position in grammar,’ Sign Language Studies, vol. 91, pp. 101–160.Find this resource:

Bourguignon, N., A. Nadig, and D. Valois (2012). ‘The biolinguistics of autism: Emergent perspectives,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 6, pp. 124–165.Find this resource:

Boyer, P. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Boysson-Bardies, B., and Vihman, M. M. (1991). ‘Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages,’ Language, vol. 67, pp. 297–319.Find this resource:

Boysson-Bardies, B., P. Hallé, L. Sagart, and C. Durand (1989). ‘A crosslinguistic investigation of vowel formants in babbling,’ Journal of Child Language, vol. 6, pp. 1–17.Find this resource:

Braine, M. D. S., and B. Rumain (1981). ‘Development of comprehension of “or”: Evidence for a sequence of competencies,’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 31, pp. 46–78.Find this resource:

Branchini, C. (2014). On relativization and clefting: An analysis of Italian Sign Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Branchini C., and C. Donati (2009). ‘Relatively different: Italian Sign Language relative clauses in a typological perspective,’ in A. Lipták (ed.), Correlatives cross-linguistically, pp. 157–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Branchini, C., C. Donati, C. Pfau, and M. Steinbach (2007). ‘Relatively similar: Relative clause typology and sign languages,’ paper presented at the 2nd Conference of the Association Francaise de Linguistique Cognitive (AFLiCo), Lille, France, May 10, 2007. Available at: http://www.uva.nl/over-de-uva/organisatie/medewerkers/content/p/f/r.pfau/r.pfau.html.Find this resource:

Brannon, Elizabeth M., and Herbert S. Terrace (1998). ‘Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys,’ Science, vol. 282, pp. 746–749.Find this resource:

Brannon, Elizabeth M., and Herbert S. Terrace (2000). ‘Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta),’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, vol. 26, pp. 31–49.Find this resource:

Brannon, Elizabeth M., Courtney J. Wusthoff, C.R. Gallistel, and John Gibbon. (2001). ‘Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale,’ Psychological Science, vol. 12, pp. 238–243.Find this resource:

Brasseur, Patrice (1986). ‘Traces des parlers normands dans le créole d’Haïti: Linguistique générale et linguistique romane. Histoire de la grammaire,’ Actes du XVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et philologie romane, Aix-en-Provence, 29 août–3 septembre 1983. Volume 6, pp. 233–245. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan W. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics, 16. Oxford: Blackwell. (p. 557) Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Jonni M. Kanerva. (1989). ‘Locative inversion in Chichewa,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 20, pp. 1–50.Find this resource:

Brosch, Michael, Elena Selezneva, Cornelia Bucks, and Henning Scheich (2004). ‘Macaque monkeys discriminate pitch relationships,’ Cognition, vol. 91, pp. 259–272.Find this resource:

Browman, Catherine, and Louis Goldstein (1990). ‘Tiers in articulatory phonology,’ in J. Kingston and M.E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I, pp. 341–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Roger, and Camille Hanlon (1970). ‘Derivational complexity and the order of acquisition in child speech,’ in J. R. Hayes (ed.) Cognition and the development of language, pp. 11–54. New York: Wiley.Find this resource:

Brunot, Ferdinand (1906). Histoire de la langue française des origines à nos jours: Tome II. Le seizième siècle. Paris: Colin.Find this resource:

Brunot, Ferdinand, and Charles Bruneau (1913). Histoire de la langue française des origines à 1900. Tome IV, Première partie. La Langue classique (1660–1715). Paris: Colin.Find this resource:

Bunsen, Christian Karl Josias (1854). Outlines of the philosophy of universal history applied to language and religion. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.Find this resource:

Burkhardt, P., S. Avrutin, M. M. Pinango, and E. Ruigendijk (2008). ‘Slower-than-normal syntactic processing in agrammatical Broca’s aphasia: Evidence from Dutch,’ Journal of Neurolinguistics, vol. 21, pp. 120–137.Find this resource:

Burge, Tyler (1973). ‘Reference and proper names,’ The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, pp. 425–439.Find this resource:

Busnel, R.-G., and A. Classe (1976) Whistled languages. Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

Byrne, Richard W. (2007). ‘Clues to the origin of the human mind from primate observational field data,’ The Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology, vol. 57, pp. 1–14.Find this resource:

Cadely, Jean-Robert (2002). ‘Le statut des voyelles nasales en créole haïtien,’ Lingua, vol. 112, pp. 435–464.Find this resource:

Calabrese, Andrea (1988). ‘Towards a theory of phonological alphabets,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Campbell, Lyle (1991). ‘Some grammaticalization changes in Estonian and their implications,’ in E. C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. I: Theoretical and methodological issues, pp. 285–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Campbell, Lyle (2003). ‘The history of linguistics,’ in M. Aronoff and J. Rees-Miller (eds.), Handbook of linguistics, pp. 81–104. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Campbell, Lyle (2004). Historical linguistics, 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Find this resource:

Campbell, Lyle, and William Poser (2008). Language classification: History and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke (1999). ‘The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns,’ in Henk Van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe, pp. 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Carey, Susan (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Carnap, Rudolf (1928). Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.Find this resource:

Carnap, Rudolf (1937 [1934]). Logische Syntax der Sprache, Vienna. English translation, 1937, The Logical structure of language. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Carnie, Andrew, Sheila Dooley, and Heidi Harley (2005). Verb first. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Carrier-Duncan, Jill (1985). ‘Linking of thematic roles in derivational word formation,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 16, pp. 1–34.Find this resource:

Carroll, Sean B. (2005). Endless forms most beautiful. New York: Norton. (p. 558) Find this resource:

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1999). The origins of complex language: An inquiry into the evolutionary beginnings of sentences, syllables, & truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cartmill, E. A., D. Hunsicker, and S. Goldin-Meadow (2014). ‘Pointing and naming are not redundant: Children use gesture to modify nouns before they modify nouns in speech,’ Developmental Psychology, vol. 50, pp. 1660–1666.Find this resource:

Catts, H. W., S. M. Adlof, T. P. Hogan, and S. E. Weismer (2005). ‘Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders?’ Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, vol. 48, pp. 1378–1396.Find this resource:

Cavalli Sforza, Luigi Luca. (2000). Genes, peoples, and languages. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Cecchetto, C. (2012). ‘Sentence types,’ in R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, and B. Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (HSK—Handbooks of linguistics and communication science), pp. 292–315. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Cecchetto, C., C. Geraci, and S. Zucchi (2006). ‘Strategies of relativization in Italian Sign Language,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 24, pp. 945–975.Find this resource:

Cecchetto, C., C. Geraci, and S. Zucchi (2009). ‘Another way to mark syntactic dependencies: The case for right peripheral specifiers in sign languages,’ Language, vol. 85, pp. 278–320.Find this resource:

Cecchetto, C., A. Checchetto, C. Geraci, M. Santoro, and S. Zucchi (2015). ‘The syntax of predicate ellipsis in Italian Sign Language (LIS),’ Lingua, vol. 166B, pp. 214–235. Special issue on Identity in Ellipsis, edited by A. Lipták.Find this resource:

Chafe, Wallace L. (1976). ‘Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view,’ in Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, pp. 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Chaitin, G. (2005). MetaMath: The quest for omega. NewYork: Pantheon Books.Find this resource:

Chang, S., M. Plauché, and John Ohala (2001). Markedness and consonant confusion asymmetries,’ in E. Hume and K. Johnson (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology, pp. 79–101. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Chaturvedi, M. (ed.) (2009). Bhartrhari: Language, thought and reality. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.Find this resource:

Chaudenson, Robert, and Salikoko Mufwene (2001). Creolization of language and culture. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Cheney, Dorothy L., and Robert M. Seyfarth (1990). How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Cheney, Dorothy L., and Robert M. Seyfarth (2007). Baboon metaphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Cheng, Lisa L.-S. (1991). ‘The typology of wh-questions,’ PhD. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Rint Sybesma (2005). ‘Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese,’ in Guglielmo Cinque and Richard S. Kayne (eds.), Handbook of comparative syntax, pp. 259–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cheour-Luhtanen, M., K. Alho, T. Kujala, K. Sainio, K. Reinikainen, M. Renlund, O. Aaltonen, O. Eerola, and R. Näätänen (1995). ‘Mismatch negativity indicates vowel discrimination in newborns,’ Hearing Research, vol. 82, pp. 53–58.Find this resource:

Cherniak, Christopher (2005). ‘Innateness and brain-wiring optimization: Non-genomic nativism,’ in A. Zilhão (ed.), Evolution, rationality, and cognition, pp. 103–112. New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Chesi, Cristiano (2014). ‘On directionality of phrase structure building,’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 44, pp. 1–5. (p. 559) Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro (1998a). ‘Plurality of mass nouns and the notion “semantic parameter”,’ in Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events in grammar, pp. 53–103. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro (1998b). ‘Reference to kinds across languages,’ Natural Language Semantics, vol. 6, pp. 339–405.Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro (2013). Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and interpretation, Oxford studies in semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Teresa Guasti, A. Gualmini, and L. Meroni (2001). ‘The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures,’ in Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez, and Aimee Johansen (eds.) Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 157–168. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Choi, Youngon, and John C. Trueswell (2010).‘Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing,’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 106, pp. 41–61.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1955). ‘Logical syntax and semantics: Their linguistic relevance,’ Language, vol. 31, pp. 36–45.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1955/1975). The logical structure of linguistic theory. Published 1956 version in part (1975) with Chomsky’s introduction. New York: Plenum Press, and University of Chicago Press (1985). 1955 manuscript currently available as PDF document on Internet.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1956). ‘Three models for the description of language,’ IRE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 2, pp. 113–124.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal behavior. Language, vol. 35, pp. 26–58.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1959/1963). ‘On certain formal properties of grammars,’ Information and Control, vol. 2, pp. 137–167. Reprinted in R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush, and Eugene Galanter (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, 2, pp. 125–155. New York: Wiley and Sons.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1966/2009). Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper and Row. 2009: 3rd edition with new introduction by J. McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1967a). ‘The formal nature of language,’ in Eric H. Lenneberg (ed.) Biological foundations of language, pp. 397–442. New York: Wiley and Sons.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1967b). ‘Recent contributions to the theory of innate ideas,’ Synthese, vol. 17, pp. 2–11.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1968/1972/2006). Language and Mind. 1st edition 1968. Expanded 2nd edition version 1972, New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. 3rd edition 2006 with new preface and an additional 2004 chapter entitled ‘Biolinguistics and the human capacity.’ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1971). Problems of knowledge and freedom. New York: Pantheon.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1973). ‘Conditions on transformations,’ in Stephen Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, pp. 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1977). Essays on form and interpretation. Amsterdam: North Holland.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1978). ‘A naturalistic approach to language and cognition,’ Cognition and Brain Theory, vol. 4, pp. 3–22. (p. 560) Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1981a). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1981b). ‘Principles and parameters in syntactic theory,’ in Norbert Hornstein and David W. Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition, pp. 32–75. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1982a). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1982b). The Generative Enterprise: A Discussion with Riny Huybregts and Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1986a). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1986b). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1992). ‘Explaining language use,’ Philosophical Topics, vol. 20, pp. 205–231.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1993). ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory,’ in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.) The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1994). Language and thought. Wakefield, Rhode Island, and London: Moyer Bell.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1995a). ‘Language and nature,’ Mind, vol. 104, pp. 1–61.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1995b). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1997). ‘Language and problems of knowledge,’ Teorema, vol. XVI, pp. 5–33.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2000a). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Foreword by Neil Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2000b). ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework,’ in Robert Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds.) Step by step: Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, pp. 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2001a). ‘Derivation by phase,’ in Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, pp. 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2001b). ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy,’ MIT occasional papers in linguistics, 20, Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2002). On nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2003a). ‘Reply to Rey,’ in Louise M. Antony and Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and his critics, pp. 274–286. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2003b). ‘Reply to Ludlow,’ in Louise M. Anthony and Norbert Hornstein (eds.) Chomsky and his critics, pp. 287–295. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2004a). ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy,’ in Adriana Belletti (ed.), The cartography of syntactic structures. Vol. 3: Structures and beyond, pp. 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2004b). The generative enterprise reconsidered. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2004c). ‘Language and mind: Current thoughts on ancient problems,’ in Lyle Jenkins (ed.), Variations and universals in biolinguistics, pp. 379–405. London: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2005). ‘Three factors in language design,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 36, pp. 1–22.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2007a). ‘Approaching UG from below,’ in Hans-Martin Gärtner and Uli Sauerland (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language?, pp. 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2007b). ‘Of minds and language,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 1, pp. 9–27.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2008). ‘On Phases,’ in Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizaretta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, pp. 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (p. 561) Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2013). ‘Problems of projection,’ Lingua, vol. 130, pp. 33–49.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (2015). ‘Problems of projection: Extensions,’ in Elisa di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann, and Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, pp. 1–16. Amsterdan: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Random House.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik (1993). ‘The theory of principles and parameters,’ in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, pp. 506–569. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam, and James McGilvray (2012). The science of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam, and George A. Miller (1963). ‘Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages,’ in R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush, and Eugene Galanter (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. 2, pp. 269–321. New York: Wiley.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam, and Marcel P. Schützenberger (1963). ‘The algebraic theory of context free languages,’ in P. Braffort and D. Hirschberg (eds.), Computer programming and formal languages, pp. 118–161. Amsterdam: North Holland.Find this resource:

Chondrogianni, V., T. Marinis, S. Edwards, and E. Blom (2015). ‘Production and on-line comprehension of definite articles and clitic pronouns by Greek sequential bilingual children and monolingual children with specific language impairment,’ Applied Psycholinguistics, vol. 36, pp. 1155–1191.Find this resource:

Christophe, A., Marina Nespor, MariaTeresa Guasti, and B. Van Oyen (2003). ‘Prosodic structure and syntactic acquisition: The case of the head-direction parameter,’ Developmental Sciencei, vol. 6, pp. 211–220.Find this resource:

Chung, Sandra (2005). ‘What fronts? On the VP raising account of verb-initial order,’ in Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, and Sheila Dooley (eds.), On the syntax of verb-initial languages, pp. 9–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Chung, Sandra, and William A. Ladusaw (2004). Restriction and saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Churchland, P. (1981). ‘Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes,’ Journal of Philosophy, vol. 78, pp. 67–90.Find this resource:

Churchward, Clerk M. (1953). Tongan grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (1991). Types of A′-dependency. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (1993). ‘A null theory of phrase and compound stress,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 24, pp. 239–297.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (2004). Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (2010). The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo (2013). ‘Word order typology: A change of perspective,’ in Theresa Biberauer and Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word orders, pp. 47–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cinque, Guglielmo, and Luigi Rizzi (2010). Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structure, vol. 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald (1989). ‘The grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia,’ Linguistics, vol. 27, pp. 897–920. (p. 562) Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald (2008). ‘Chomskyan syntactic theory and language disorders,’ in M.–J. Ball, M. Perkins, N. Müller, and S. Howard (eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics, pp. 165–183. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald, and Pieter Muysken (1986). ‘The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order,’ Second Language Research, vol. 2, pp. 93–119.Find this resource:

Clahsen, Harald, C. Kursawe, and M. Penke (1996). ‘Introducing CP: Wh-questions and subordinate clauses in German child language,’ in C. Koster and F. Wijnen (eds.), Proceedings of the Groningen Assembly on Language Acquisition (GALA). Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition.Find this resource:

Clark, A. (2012). Comment on ‘Poverty of stimulus redux,’ http://facultyoflanguage.blogspot.com.cy/2012/11/poverty-of-stimulus-redux.html?showComment=1353216596624#c3222261129984061931.

Clark, Eve (2009). First language acquisition. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Robin (1990). Papers on learnability and natural selection: Technical reports on formal and computational linguistics, vol. 1. University of Geneva.Find this resource:

Clark, Robin (1992). ‘The selection of syntactic knowledge,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 2, pp. 83–149.Find this resource:

Clark, Robin, and Ian Roberts (1993). ‘A computational model of language learnability and language change,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 24, pp. 299–345.Find this resource:

Clark, Robin, and Ian Roberts (1994). ‘On complexity as the engine of variation,’ manuscript, Universities of Pennsylvania and Bangor.Find this resource:

Claudi, Ulrike (1994). ‘Word order change as category change: The Mande case,’ in W. Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, pp. 191–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Clements, G. N. (1985). ‘The geometry of phonological features,’ Phonology yearbook, vol. 2, pp. 225–252.Find this resource:

Clements, G. N. (1987). ‘Phonological feature representation and the description of intrusive stops,’ in A. Bosch, B. Need, and E. Schiller (eds.), Parasession on autosegmental and metrical phonology, proceedings of the 23rd meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, vol. 2, pp. 29–50. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Find this resource:

Clements, G. N. (1990). ‘The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification,’ in John Kingston and Mary Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech, pp. 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clements, G. N. (2003). ‘Feature economy in sound systems,’ Phonology, vol. 20, pp. 287–333.Find this resource:

Coen, Michael H. (2006). ‘Multimodal dynamics: Self-supervised learning in perceptual & motor systems,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Cogill-Koez, D. (2000). ‘Signed language classifier predicates: Linguistic structures or schematic visual representation?’, Sign Language and Linguistics, vol. 3, pp. 153–207.Find this resource:

Colonna V., A. Boattini, Cristina Guardiano, I. Dall’Ara, D. Pettener, Giuseppe Longobardi, and G. Barbujani (2010). ‘Long-range comparison between genes and languages based on syntactic distances,’ Human Heredity, vol. 70, pp. 245–254.Find this resource:

Comrie, Bernard (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Conti-Ramsden, G., N. Botting, and B. Faragher (2001). ‘Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment,’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 42, pp. 741–748.Find this resource:

Conway, Christopher M., and Morten H. Christiansen (2001). ‘Sequential learning in non-human primates,’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 539–546. (p. 563) Find this resource:

Conway-Morris, Simon (2003). Life’s solution: Inevitable humans in a lonely universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Corballis, Michael C. (2003). ‘From hand to mouth: The gestural origins of language,’ in M. H. Christiansen and S. Kirby (eds.), Language evolution, pp. 201–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cordemoy, Géraud de (1666). Discours physique de la parole. 2nd edition 1977; English translation 1668.Find this resource:

Corina, D. (2000). ‘Some observations regarding paraphasia in American Sign Language,’ in K. Emmorey and H. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, pp. 493–507. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Find this resource:

Corne, Chris (1999). From French to Creole: The development of new vernaculars in the French colonial world. London: University of Westminster Press.Find this resource:

Costa, João, and Maria Lobo (2007). ‘Clitic omission, null objects or both in the acquisition of European Portuguese?’ In S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen, and M. Pinto (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2005, pp. 59–71. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Costa, João, Maria Lobo, J. Carmona, and C. Silva (2008). ‘Clitic omission in European Portuguese: Correlation with null objects?’, in A. Gavarró and M. J. Freitas (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2007, pp. 133–143. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Find this resource:

Cournane, Ailís (2014). ‘In search of L1 evidence for diachronic reanalysis: Mapping modal verbs,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 21, pp. 103–117.Find this resource:

Covington, M. A. (2009). Syntactic theory in the high Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Cowie, Fiona (1999). What’s within? Nativism reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Crain, Stephen (1991). ‘Language acquisition in the absence of experience,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 14, pp. 597–650.Find this resource:

Crain, Stephen, and Cecile McKee (1985). ‘The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora,’ in Steve Berman, Jae-Woong Choe, and Joyce McDonough (edss), Proceedings of the 15th annual meeting of North East Linguistic Society (NELS 15), pp. 94–110. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Find this resource:

Crain, Stephen, and S. Nakayama (1987). ‘Structure dependence in grammar formation,’ Language, vol. 63, pp. 522–543.Find this resource:

Crain, Stephen, and Rosalind Thornton (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to experiments in the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Crain, Stephen, Takuya Goro, and Rosalind Thornton (2006). ‘Language acquisition is language change,’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 35, pp. 31–49.Find this resource:

Crain, Stephen, Drew Khlentzosc, and Rosalind Thornton (2010). ‘Universal Grammar versus language diversity,’ Lingua, vol. 120, pp. 2668–2672.Find this resource:

Crisma, Paola (2015). ‘The “indefinite article” from cardinal to operator to expletive,’ in C. Gianollo, A. Jager, and D. Penka (eds.), Language change at the syntax–semantics interface, pp. 125–153. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Croft, William (1995). ‘Autonomy and functionalist linguistics,’ Language, vol. 71, pp. 490–532.Find this resource:

Croft, William (1999). The diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, William. (2003). Typology and universals, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (p. 564) Find this resource:

Cross, Ian, and G. Woodruff (2008). ‘Music as a communicative medium,’ in R. Botha and C. Knight (eds.), The prehistory of language, Volume I, pp. 113–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cross, Ian, J. Bisphan, T. Himberg, and J. Swaine (n.d.). ‘Evolution and musical rhythm,’ manuscript, University of Cambridge.Find this resource:

Cudworth, Ralph (1996). Treatise concerning eternal and immutable morality. New edition, edited by Sarah Hutton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Culicover, Peter W., and Ray Jackendoff (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Curnow, Timothy Jowan (2001). ‘What language features can be borrowed?’ In A. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, vol. 412–436. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Curtiss, Susan (1977). Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day ‘wild child.’ Boston: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Cuxac, C. (1999). ‘French sign language: Proposition of a structural explanation by iconicity,’ in A. Braort et al. (eds.), Gesture-based communication in human–computer interaction, pp. 165–184. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Darwin, Charles (1871). The descent of man. London: John Murray.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. (1980). Actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. (2004). Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Davidson, Kathryn (2015). ‘Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity,’ Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 38, pp. 477–520.Find this resource:

Davidson, Lisa, Peter Jusczyk, and Paul Smolensky (2004). ‘The initial and final states: Theoretical implications and experimental explorations of Richness of the Base,’ in René Kager, Joe Pater, and Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition, pp. 321–368. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

De Casper, A. J., and M. J. Spence (1986). ‘Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds,’ Infant Behavior and Development, vol. 9, pp. 133–150.Find this resource:

De Fossé, L., S. M. Hodge, N. Makris, D. N. Kennedy, V. S. Jr. Caviness, L. McGrath, S. Steele, D. A. Ziegler, M. R. Herbert, J. A. Frazier, H. Tager-Flusberg, and G. J. Harris (2004). ‘Language-association cortex asymmetry in autism and specific language impairment,’ Annals of Neurology, vol. 56, pp. 757–766.Find this resource:

De Lacy, Paul (2002). ‘The formal expression of markedness,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.Find this resource:

De Lacy, Paul (2006a). Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

De Lacy, Paul (2006b). ‘Transmissibility and the role of the phonological component,’ Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 32, pp. 185–196.Find this resource:

De Lacy, Paul, and John Kingston (2013). ‘Synchronic explanation,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 31, pp. 287–355.Find this resource:

De Lange, J. (2008). ‘Article omission in child speech and headlines: A processing account,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.Find this resource:

De Neys, W., and W. Schaeken (2007). ‘When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature,’ Experimental Psychology, vol. 54, pp. 128–133.Find this resource:

de Sivers, F. 1969. Analyse grammaticale de l’estonien parlé. Clermont-Ferrand, France: G. de Bussac.Find this resource:

De Villiers, J. (2007) ‘The interface of language and theory of mind,’ Lingua, vol. 117, pp. 1858–1878. (p. 565) Find this resource:

De Vincenzi, Maria (1991). ‘Filler-gap dependencies in a null-subject language: Referential and nonreferential whs,’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 20, pp. 197–213.Find this resource:

De Vincenzi, Maria, L. Arduino, L. Ciccarelli, and R. Job (1999). ‘Parsing strategies in children comprehension of interrogative sentences,’ in S. Bagnara (ed.), Proceedings of long papers of ECCS’99 (European Conference of Cognitive Science), pp. 301–308.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (1995). ‘Predicate-movement, quantification, events and properties,’ in Victor Manfredi and Karl Reynolds (eds.), Niger-Congo syntax and semantics, vol. 6, pp. 69–82. Boston, MA: Boston University African Studies Center.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (1997). ‘Verb syntax in creolization (and beyond),’ in L. Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, pp. 64–94. London: Longman.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (1999a). ‘Creolization, language change and language acquisition: A prolegomenon,’ in M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development, pp. 1–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (1999b). ‘Creolization, language change and language acquisition: An epilogue,’ in M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development, pp. 473–543. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (2001a). ‘Morphology in Creole genesis: Linguistics and ideology,’ in Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, pp. 53–121. Cambridge: MIT Press.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (2001b). ‘On the origins of Creole: A Cartesian critique of Neo-Darwinian linguistics,’ Linguistic Typology, vol. 5, pp. 213–310.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (2002). ‘Relexification: A re-evaluation,’ Anthropological Linguistics, vol. 44, pp. 321–414.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (2005a). ‘Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole Exceptionalism,’ Language in Society, vol. 34, pp. 533–591.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (2005b). ‘Word order and morphology in “creolization” and beyond,’ in Guglielmo Cinque and Richard Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, pp. 293–372. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (2007). ‘Kreyòl Ayisyen, or Haitian Creole,’ in John Holm and Peter Patrick (eds.), Comparative creole syntax: Parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars. Westminster Creolistics series, 7, pp. 101–126. London: Battlebridge Publications.Find this resource:

DeGraff, Michel (2009). ‘Language acquisition in creolization and, thus, language change: Some Cartesian-Uniformitarian boundary conditions,’ Language and Linguistic Compass, vols. 3/4, pp. 888–971.Find this resource:

Dehaene, Stanislas (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dehaene, Stanislas (2007). Les neurones de la lecture. Paris: Odile Jacob.Find this resource:

Dehaene-Lambertz, G., and D. Houston (1998). ‘Faster orientation latency toward native language in two-month-old infants,’ Language and Speech, vol. 41, pp. 21–43.Find this resource:

Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Rex A. Sprouse, and Bruce Anderson (1998).‘Interlanguage A-bar dependencies: Binding construals, null prepositions and Universal Grammar,’ Second Language Research, vol. 14, pp. 341–358.Find this resource:

Delfitto, Denis, and Jan Schroten (1991). ‘Bare plurals and the number affix in DP,’ Probus, vol. 3, pp. 155–185.Find this resource:

Dell, François (1981). ‘On the learnability of optional phonological rules,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 12, pp. 31–37.Find this resource:

Delsing, Lars Olof (2000). ‘From OV to VO in Swedish,’ in Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas, and Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, pp. 255–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (p. 566) Find this resource:

Denis, Serge (ed.) (1935). Nos antilles: Trois siècles de vie française. Orléans: G. Luzeray.Find this resource:

Dennett, D. C. (1987/1996), The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Descartes, René (1637). ‘Discourse on the method,’ in Descartes (1984–1985).Find this resource:

Descartes, René (1984–1985). The philosophical writings of Descartes (2 vols.). Translated by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Descartes, René (1991). The philosophical writings of Descartes, vol. 3, the correspondence. Translated by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, and A. Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Descourtilz, Michel Etienne (1809). Voyages d’un naturaliste et ses observations faites sur les trois règnes de la nature, dans plusieurs ports de mer français, en Espagne, au continent de l’Amérique Septentrionale, à Saint-Yago de Cuba, et à St.-Domingue … (3 volumes). Paris: Dufart, père.Find this resource:

Deutscher, Guy (2009). ‘Overall complexity: A wild goose chase?’ In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil, and Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, vol. 243–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Devine, Andrew, and Laurence Stephens (2006). Latin word order: Structured meaning and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Devitt, M. (2006). Ignorance of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Devlin, Keith (2005). The math instinct. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Find this resource:

Dewey, Tonya (2006). ‘The origins and development of Germanic V2,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Diercks, M. (2012). ‘Parameterizing case: Evidence from Bantu,’ Syntax, vol. 15, pp. 253–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00165.x Find this resource:

Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Kenneth Wexler, Robert C. Berwick, Cedric Boeckx, Lyle Jenkins, Juan Uriagereka, Karen Stromswold, Lisa L.-S. Cheng, Heidi Harley, A. Wedel, John McGilvray, Elly van Gelderen, and Tom Bever (2010). ‘The biological nature of human language,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 4, pp. 4–34.Find this resource:

Ding, N., L. Melloni, H. Zhang, X. Tian, and D. Poeppel (2015). ‘Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech,’ Nature Neuroscience, vol. 19, pp. 158–164.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (1998). The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dixon, R. M. W. (2010). Basic linguistic theory. Volume 1: Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Donegan, Patricia, and David Stampe (1979). ‘The study of Natural Phonology,’ in Dan Dinnsen (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory, vol. 126–173. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Find this resource:

Dong, Hongyuan (2005). ‘Gradable adjectives in Chinese and degree morphemes,’ manuscript, Cornell University.Find this resource:

Donohue, Mark, Simon Musgrave, Bronwen Whiting, and Søren Wichmann (2011). ‘Typological feature analysis models linguistic geography,’ Language, vol. 87, pp. 369–383.Find this resource:

Douady, S., and Y. Couder (1992). ‘Phyllotaxis as a physical self-organized growth process,’ Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, pp. 2098–2101.Find this resource:

Doupe, Allison J., and Patricia K. Kuhl (1999). ‘Birdsong & human speech: Common themes & mechanisms,’ Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 22, pp. 567–631.Find this resource:

Dowty, David (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Dowty, David (1991). ‘Thematic proto-roles and argument selection,’ Language, vol. 67, pp. 547–619. (p. 567) Find this resource:

Dresher, Elan (1999). ‘Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 30, pp. 27–68.Find this resource:

Dresher, Elan (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dresher, Elan (2013). ‘The arch and not the stones: Universal Feature Theory without universal features.’ Paper given at Features in Phonology, Morphology, Syntax and Semantics: What Are They? CASTL, University of Tromsø, October–November 2013.Find this resource:

Dresher, Elan, and Jonathan Kaye (1990). ‘A computational learning model for metrical phonology,’ Cognition, vol. 34, pp. 137–195.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1988). ‘Object-verb order and adjective-noun order: Dispelling a myth,’ Lingua, vol. 74, pp. 185–217.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1989). ‘Large linguistic areas and language sampling,’ Studies in Language, vol. 13, pp. 257–292.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1992). ‘The Greenbergian word order correlations,’ Language, vol. 68, pp. 81–138.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1997). ‘Are grammatical relations universal?’ In Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón, pp. 115–143. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1998a). ‘Aspects of word order in the languages of Europe,’ in Anna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe, pp. 283–320. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1998b). ‘Why statistical universals are better than absolute universals,’ in Papers from the 33rd annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: The panels, pp. 123–145. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2013a). ‘Definite articles,’ in Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/37, accessed on April 14, 2015.)Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2013b). ‘Position of polar question particles,’ in Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/92, Accessed on April 14, 2015.)Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2013c). ‘Expression of pronominal subjects,’ in Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/101, Accessed on April 14, 2015.)Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2013d). ‘Genealogical Language List,’ in Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/languoid/genealogy, Accessed on April 14, 2015.)Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2013e). ‘Order of object and verb,’ in Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/83, Accessed on September 17, 2015.)Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (2013f). ‘Order of adposition and noun phrase,’ in Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck (p. 568) Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/85, Accessed on September 17, 2015.)Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew, and Martin Haspelmath (eds.) (2013). The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available online at http://wals.info/ Find this resource:

Du Bois, John (1985). ‘Competing motivations,’ in John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, pp. 343–365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Du Bois, John (1987). ‘The discourse basis of ergativity,’ Language, vol. 63, pp. 805–855.Find this resource:

Du Marsais, César Chesneau (1729/1971). Les véritables principes de la grammaire ou Nouvelle grammaire raisonnée pour apprendre la langue latine. Paris: Hachette.Find this resource:

Ducœurjoly, S.-J. (1802). Manuel des habitans de Saint-Domingue, 2 volumes. Paris: Lenoir.Find this resource:

Duguine, M. and N. Madariaga. (2015). ‘What diachrony tells us about the pro-drop parameter,’ talk given at Workshop on Diachronic Syntax and (Modern) Parametric Theory, 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, July 27–31.Find this resource:

Dunn, Michael, Stephen C. Levinson, Eva Lindström, Ger Reesink, and Angela Terrill (2008). ‘Structural phylogeny in historical linguistics: Methodological explorations applied in Island Melanesia,’ Language, vol. 84, pp. 710–759.Find this resource:

Dunn, Micheal, S. J. Greenhill, Stephen C. Levinson, and R. D. Gray (2011). ‘Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals,’ Nature, vol. 473, pp. 79–82.Find this resource:

duPlessis, Jean, Doreen Solan, Lisa Travis, and Lydia White (1987). ‘UG or not UG, that is the question: A reply to Clahsen and Muysken,’ Second Language Research, vol. 3, pp. 56–75.Find this resource:

Dyen, Isidore, Joseph B. Kruskal, and Paul Black (1992). ‘An Indoeuropean classification: A lexicostatistical experiment,’ Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 82(5), pp. 1–132.Find this resource:

Ecay, Aaron (2014). ‘Constructing quantitative grammatical arguments.’ Paper presented at the University of Manchester, Oct. 15., 2014 (http://aaronecay.com/files/Ecay-Manchester-constant-rate.pdf).Find this resource:

Ecay, Aaron (2015). ‘A multi-step analysis of the evolution of English do-support,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Eckhardt, Regine (2006). Meaning change in grammaticalization: An inquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Eckman, Fred (1981). ‘On the naturalness of interlanguage phonological rules,’ Language Learning, vol. 31, pp. 195–216.Find this resource:

Eckman, Fred, Abdullah El Reyes, and Gregory Iverson (2001). ‘Allophonic splits in L2 phonology: The question of learnability,’ Perspectives on interlanguage phonetics and phonology. Monograph issue of International Journal of English Studies, vol. 1, pp. 21–51.Find this resource:

Edmondson, Jerold, John Esling, and Jimmy Harris (2004). ‘Supraglottal cavity shape, linguistic register, and other phonetic features of Somali,’ manuscript, University of Texas at Arlington. http://ling.uta.edu/~jerry/somali.pdf.

Eisele, Carolyn (ed.) (1976). The new elements of mathematics by Charles S. Peirce. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Find this resource:

Elbourne, Paul (2002). ‘E-type anaphora as NP deletion,’ Natural Language Semantics, vol. 9, pp. 241–288.Find this resource:

Elders, Fons (1974). Reflexive waters. Transcripts of a series on Dutch television, including a debate between Chomsky and Foucault, ‘Human nature: Justice versus power.’ Toronto: J.M. Dent.Find this resource:

Embick, David, and David Poeppel (2006). ‘Mapping syntax using imaging: Prospects and problems for the study of neurolinguistic computation,’ in Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 7, 2nd edition, pp. 484–486. Oxford: Elsevier. (p. 569) Find this resource:

Embick, David, and David Poeppel (2015). ‘Towards a computationalist neurobiology of language: Correlational, integrated, and explanatory neurolinguistics,’ Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, vol. 30, pp. 357–366.Find this resource:

Emmorey, K., and M. Herzig (2003). ‘Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL,’ in K. Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, pp. 221–246. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Emonds, Joseph E. (1976). A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure preserving, and local transformations. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Endress, Ansgar D., Donal Cahill, Stefanie Block, Jeffrey Watumull, and Marc D. Hauser (2009). ‘Evidence of an evolutionary precursor to human language affixation in a non-human primate,’ Biology Letters, vol. 5, pp. 749–751.Find this resource:

Endress, Ansgar D., Sarah Carden, Elisabetta Versace, and Marc D. Hauser (2010). ‘The apes’ edge: Positional learning in chimpanzees & humans,’ Animal Cognition, vol. 13, pp. 483–495.Find this resource:

Ericsson, K. A., and W. Kintsch (1995). ‘Long-term working memory,’ Psychological Review, vol. 102, pp. 211–245.Find this resource:

Ernst, Thomas (1992). ‘The phrase structure of English negation,’ Linguistic Review, vol. 9, pp. 109–144.Find this resource:

Ernst, Thomas (2001). The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Evans, Daniel Silvan (1852). Geiriadur Saesoneg a Chymraeg: An English and Welsh dictionary. Denbigh, U.K.: Thomas Gee.Find this resource:

Evans, G. (1980). ‘Pronouns,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 11, pp. 337–362.Find this resource:

Evans, Nick, and Stephen C. Levinson (2009). ‘The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science,’ Behavioural and Brain Sciences, vol. 32, pp. 429–492.Find this resource:

Faarlund, Jan-Terje (1990). Syntactic change: Toward a theory of historical syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Falk, Cecilia (1993). ‘Non-referential subjects and agreement in the history of Swedish,’ Lingua, vol. 89, pp. 143–180.Find this resource:

Fanselow, Gisbert, and Caroline Féry (2002). Resolving conflicts in grammars: Optimality Theory in syntax, morphology, and phonology. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Find this resource:

Faraclas, Nicolas, and Thomas B. Klein (2009). ‘Introduction,’ in Nicholas Faraclas and Thomas B. Klein (eds.), Simplicity and complexity in Creoles and Pidgins, 1–3. London: Battlebridge.Find this resource:

Fattier, Dominique (1998). ‘Contribution à l’étude de la genèse d’un créole: L’atlas linguistique d’Haïti, cartes et commentaires,’ 6 volumes. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Provence, distributed by Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France.Find this resource:

Fattier, Dominique (2002). ‘Lexique: Approche synchronique, à propos de l’haïtien,’ in Claudine Bavoux and Didier de Robillard (eds.), Linguistique et créolistique. Univers créoles 2, pp. 111–128. Paris: Anthropos.Find this resource:

Fattier, Dominique (2003). ‘Grammaticalisations en créole haïtien: Morceaux choisis,’ Creolica, April 23, 2003.Find this resource:

Fehér, Olga, Wang Haibin, Sigal Saar, Partha P. Mitra, and Ofer Tchernichovski (2009). ‘De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finch,’ Nature, vol. 459, pp. 564–568.Find this resource:

Feigenson, Lisa, and Justin Halberda (2004). ‘Infants chunk object arrays into sets of individuals,’ Cognition, vol. 91, pp. 173–190.Find this resource:

Feldman, Heidi, Susan Goldin-Meadow, and Lila Gleitman (1978). ‘Beyond Herodotus: The creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children,’ in Andrew Lock (ed.), Action, symbol, and gesture: The emergence of language, pp. 351–414. New York: Academic Press. (p. 570) Find this resource:

Felsenstein, Joseph (1993). PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington.Find this resource:

Feng, Shengli (2005). ‘Qingdongci yiwei yu gujin Hanyu de dongbin guanxi [Light-verb movement and verb-object relation in Modern and Classical Chinese],’ Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences], vol. 1, pp. 3–16.Find this resource:

Feng, Shengli (2015). ‘Light-verb syntax between English and Classical Chinese,’ in Y.-H. Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson, and W.-T. Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese syntactic in cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 229–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ferraresi, Gisella (2005). Word order and phrase structure in Gothic. Leuven: Peeters.Find this resource:

Fiengo, Robert and Robert May (1994). Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1968). ‘The case for case,’ in Emmon Bach and Robert Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, pp. 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Find this resource:

Fintel, Kai von (1995). ‘The formal semantics of grammaticalization,’ in J. Beckman (ed.), Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the North-Eastern Linguistics Society: Workshop on language change, pp. 175–189. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA Publications.Find this resource:

Fintel, Kai von, and Lisa Matthewson (2008). ‘Universals in semantics,’ The Linguistic Review, vol. 25, pp. 139–201.Find this resource:

Firbas, Jan (1964). ‘On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis,’ Travaux Linguistique de Prague, vol. 1, pp. 267–280.Find this resource:

Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman, and Wim van der Wurff (2000). The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Fischer, Susann. (2010). Word-order change as a source of grammaticalisation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2009). ‘Prolegomena to a future science of biolinguistics,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 3, pp. 283–320.Find this resource:

Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Fitch, W. Tecumseh, and Marc D. Hauser (2004). ‘Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate,’ Science, vol. 303, pp. 377–380.Find this resource:

Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Marc D. Hauser, and Noam Chomsky (2005). ‘The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications,’ Cognition, vol. 97, pp. 179–210.Find this resource:

Fitzpatrick, Justin, Andrew Nevins, and Bert Vaux (2004). ‘Exchange rules and feature-value variables.’ Paper presented at the North American Phonology Conference. http://www.pauldelacy.net/polarity/fitzpatrick_nevins_vaux-2004-phonological%20Polarity.pdf Find this resource:

Flemming, Edward (2005). ‘Deriving natural classes in phonology,’ Lingua, vol. 115, pp. 287–309.Find this resource:

Flynn, Darin (2007). ‘Too Many solutions: Says who?’ Handout of paper presented at the Alberta Conference on Linguistics, Banff, Oct. 20. http://www.pec.ucalgary.ca/dflynn/files/dflynn/Flynn07b.pdf, retrieved 25 January 2012.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet D. (1985). ‘Deterministic parsing and subjacency,’ Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, vol. 1, pp. 3–42.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet D. (1998a). ‘Unambiguous triggers,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 29, pp. 1–36.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet D. (1998b). ‘Learning to parse?’ In D. Swinney (ed.), anniversary issue of Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 27, pp. 285–318.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet D. (1998c). ‘Parsing to learn,’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 27, pp. 339–374.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet D. (2001). ‘Setting syntactic parameters,’ in Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, pp. 730–767. Oxford: Blackwell. (p. 571) Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet D., and William Sakas (2004). ‘Evaluating models of parameter setting,’ in Alejna Brugos, Linnea Micciulla, and Christine E. Smith (eds.), BUCLD 28: Proceedings of the 28th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 1–27. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, Janet D., and William Sakas (2005). ‘The Subset Principle in syntax: Costs of compliance,’ Journal of Linguistics, vol. 41, pp. 513–569.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry (1966). ‘Could there be a theory of perception?’ Journal of Philosophy, vol. 63, pp. 369–380.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry (1968). Psychological explanation. New York: Random House.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry (1998). Concepts. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry (2001). ‘Doing without what’s within: Fiona Cowie’s critique of nativism,’ Mind, vol. 110, pp. 99–148.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry (2008). Hume variations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerry, Thomas Bever, and Merrill Garrett (1974). The Psychology of language: An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.Find this resource:

Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley (2007). ‘Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 38, pp. 197–238.Find this resource:

Fon Sing, Guillaume (2009). ‘Dynamique interne des créoles mauricien et haïtien: Analyse contrastive du fonctionnement sémantique des marqueurs TMA,’ Études Créoles, vol. 30, pp. 97–129.Find this resource:

Fon Sing, Guillaume (2010). ‘Genèse et système des marqueurs TMA en créole mauricien et en créole haïtien,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris 3 Sorbonne Nouvelle.Find this resource:

Fon Sing, Guillaume, and Jean Leoue (2012). ‘Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-creoles.’ Paper presented at Ninth Creolistics Workshop: Contact Languages in a Global Context: Past and Present. Aarhus University, Denmark, April 11–13, 2012.Find this resource:

Foppolo, Francesca, and Maria Teresa Guasti (2005). ‘Children’s comprehension of sentences involving scalar items,’ in Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert, and Giuseppina Turano (eds.), Proceedings of the thirtieth Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, pp. 13–24. Venice: Cafoscarina.Find this resource:

Foppolo, F., Maria Teresa Guasti, and Gennaro Chierchia (2012). ‘Scalar implicatures in child language: Give children a chance,’ Language Learning and Development, vol. 8, pp. 365–394.Find this resource:

Francis, Elaine J. (1998). ‘When form and meaning come apart: Quantificational nouns, predicate nominals, and locative subjects in English,’ in M. Catherine Guber, Derick Higgins, Kenneth S. Olson, and Taura Wysochi (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 159–170. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Find this resource:

Franck, Julie, Severine Millotte, Andres Posada, and Luigi Rizzi (2013). ‘Abstract knowledge of word order by 19 months: An eye-tracking study,’ Applied Psycholinguistics, vol. 34, pp. 323–336.Find this resource:

Frank, R. (2004). Phrase structure composition and syntactic dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Frege, G. (1892). On Concept and Object, originally published as ‘Über Begriff und Gegenstand’ in Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, vol. 1, pp. 192–205. English translation in P. Geach and M. Black (1952), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, pp. 42–55, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Frei, Henri (1929). La grammaire des fautes: Introduction à la linguistique fonctionnelle. Genève: Slatkine. (p. 572) Find this resource:

Freidin, Robert (1978). ‘Cyclicity and the theory of grammar,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 9, pp. 519–549.Find this resource:

Freidin, Robert (1991). ‘Linguistic theory and language acquisition: A note on structure-dependence,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 14, pp. 618–619.Find this resource:

Freidin, Robert (1999). ‘Cyclicity and Minimalism,’ in Samuel D. Epstein and Norbert Hornstein (eds.). Working Minimalism, pp. 95–126. Cambridge: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Freidin, Robert, and Howard Lasnik (2011). ‘Some roots of Minimalism,’ in Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic Minimalism, pp. 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Freidin, Robert, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud (2001). ‘Exquisite connections: Some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory,’ Lingua, vol. 111, pp. 639–666.Find this resource:

Friedmann, N. (1998). ‘Functional categories in agrammatic production: A cross-linguistic study,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Find this resource:

Friedmann, N. (2002). ‘Question production in agrammatism: The tree pruning hypothesis,’ Brain and Language, vol. 80, pp. 160–187.Find this resource:

Friedmann, N., and Y. Grodzinsky (1997). ‘Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree,’ Brain and Language, vol. 56, pp. 397–425.Find this resource:

Friedmann, N., M. Biran, and D. Dotan (2013). ‘Lexical retrieval and its breakdown in aphasia and developmental language impairment,’ in Cedric Boeckx and Kleanthes K. Grohmann (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics, pp. 350–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Friedmann, N., and R. Novogrodsky (2008). ‘Subtypes of SLI: SySLI, PhoSLI, LeSLI, and PraSLI,’ in A. Gavarró and M. João Freitas (eds.), Language acquisition and development, pp. 205–217. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Find this resource:

Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Fritzenschaft, Agnes, Ira Gawlitzek-Maiwald, Rosmarie Tracy, and Susanne Winkler (1990). ‘Wege zur komplexen Syntax,’ Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, vol. 9, pp. 52–134.Find this resource:

Fruehwald, Josef, Jonathan Gress-Wright, and Joel Wallenberg (2013). ‘Phonological rule change: The constant rate effect,’ in S. Kan, C. Moore-Cantwell, and R. Staubs (eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 1, pp. 219–230. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA Publications.Find this resource:

Fujita, Koji (2007). ‘Facing the logical problem of language evolution: Review of Jenkins (2004),’ Variation & universals in biolinguistics,’ English Linguistics, vol. 24, pp. 78–108.Find this resource:

Fukui, Naoki (1986). ‘A theory of category projection and its implications,’ Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Find this resource:

Fukui, Naoki (1996). ‘On the nature of economy in language,’ Cognitive Studies, vol. 3, pp. 51–71.Find this resource:

Fukui, Naoki, and Yuji Takano (1998). ‘Symmetry in syntax: merge and demerge,’ Journal of East Asian Linguistics, vol. 7, pp. 27–86.Find this resource:

Fuß, Eric (2005). The rise of agreement: A formal approach to the syntax and grammaticalization of verbal inflection. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Fuß, Eric (2008). Word order and language change: On the interface between syntax and morphology. Habilitationsschrift, Goethe-University Frankfurt.Find this resource:

Fuß, Eric, and Carola Trips (2002). ‘Variation and change in Old and Middle English: On the validity of the Double Base Hypothesis,’ Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, vol. 4, pp. 171–224.Find this resource:

Fyndanis, V., Spyridoula Varlokosta, and K. Tsapkini (2012). ‘Agrammatic production: Interpretable features and selective impairment in verb inflection,’ Lingua, vol. 122, pp. 1134–1147. (p. 573) Find this resource:

Gabbard, Kevin (2010). ‘A phonological analysis of Somali and the guttural consonants,’ BA thesis, Ohio State University.Find this resource:

Gafos, Adamantios (1998). ‘A-templatic reduplication,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 29, pp. 515–527.Find this resource:

Gallistel, Charles R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Gallistel, Charles R. (2006). ‘L’apprentissage de matières distinctes exige des organes distincts,’ in J. Bricmont and J. Franck (eds.), Noam Chomsky, no. 88, pp. 181–187. Paris: Cahiers de l’Herne.Find this resource:

Gallistel, Charles R., and Rochel Gelman (2005). ‘Mathematical cognition,’ in Keith Holyoak and Robert Morrison (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking & reasoning, pp. 559–588. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gambell, Tim, and Charles D. Yang (2005). ‘Word segmentation: quick but not dirty,’ manuscript, Yale University.Find this resource:

Gavarró, A. (2012). ‘Third person clitic production and omission in Romance SLI,’ in P. Guijarro-Fuentes and P. Larrañaga (eds.), Pronouns and clitics in early language, pp. 79–104. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Find this resource:

Geach, P. T. (1965). ‘Assertion,’ The Philosophical Review, vol. 74, pp. 449–465.Find this resource:

Gehring, Walter J. (1998). Master control genes in development & evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Find this resource:

Gelderen, Elly van (2004). Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gelderen, Elly van (2007). ‘The definiteness cycle in Germanic,’ Journal of Germanic Linguistics, vol. 19, pp. 275–305.Find this resource:

Gelderen, Elly van (ed.) (2009). Cyclical change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gelderen, Elly van (2011). ‘Grammaticalization and generative grammar: A difficult liaison,’ in B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, ppl 43–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Gelman, Rochel, and Charles R. Gallistel (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Gelman, Rochel, and Earl Williams (1998). ‘Enabling constraints for cognitive development and learning: Domain specificity and epigenesis,’ in William Damon, Deanna Kuhn, and Robert S. Siegler (eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language, pp. 575–630. Oxford: Wiley.Find this resource:

Gensler, O. (1994). ‘On reconstructing the syntagm S-Aux-O-V-Other to Proto-Niger-Congo,’ in K. E. Moore, D. A. Peterson, and C. Wentum (eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, February 18–21, special session on historical issues in African linguistics, pp. 1–20. University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Gentile, G. (1995). ‘Language acquisition and universal grammar: A survey of recent research,’ BA thesis, Università degli Studi di Padova.Find this resource:

Gentner, Timothy Q., Kimberly M. Fenn, Daniel Margoliash, and Howard C. Nusbaum (2006). ‘Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds,’ Nature, vol. 440, pp. 1204–1207.Find this resource:

Gentner, Timothy Q., Kimberly M. Fenn, Daniel Margoliash, and Howard C. Nusbaum (2010). ‘Simple stimuli, simple strategies,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, E65.Find this resource:

Geraci, C., V. Aristodemo, and M. Santoro (2014). ‘Escaping islands: Processing and morphosyntactic constraints in Italian Sign Language,’ talk given at LINGUAE seminar, CNRS, IJN, Paris, slides available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwIbUY4TvjzhSjRmejdwbzJCTm8/edit.

Gerritsen, Marinel (1984). ‘Divergent word order developments in the Germanic languages: A description and a tentative explanation,’ in J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Syntax, pp. 107–137. Berlin: Mouton. (p. 574) Find this resource:

Gervain, Judith, Marina Nespor, Reiko Mazuka, R. Horie, and Jacques Mehler (2008). ‘Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese–Italian cross-linguistic study,’ Cognitive Psychology, vol. 57, pp. 56–74.Find this resource:

Gianollo, Chiara, Cristina Guardiano, and Giuseppe Longobardi (2008) ‘Three fundamental issues in parametric linguistics,’ in Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, pp. 109–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gibson, Ted, and Kenneth Wexler (1994). ‘Triggers,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 25, pp. 407–454.Find this resource:

Gil da Costa, Ricardo, Allen Braun, Marco Lopes, Marc D. Hauser, Richard E. Carson, Peter Herscovitch, and Alex Martin (2004). ‘Toward an evolutionary perspective on conceptual representation: Species-specific calls activate visual & affective processing systems in the macaque.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol, 101, pp. 17516–17521.Find this resource:

Gil, David (2013). ‘Numeral classifiers,’ in Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/55, accessed on April 14, 2015.Find this resource:

Gill, H. S., and H. A. Gleason (1963/1969). A reference grammar of Panjabi [revised edition]. Department of Linguistics, Punjabi University.Find this resource:

Gilligan, Gary (1987). ‘A cross-linguistic approach to the pro-drop parameter,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.Find this resource:

Giorgi, Alessandra, and Giuseppe Longobardi (1991). The syntax of noun phrases: Configuration, parameters and empty categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Girod-Chantrans, Justin (1785 [1980]). Voyage d’un suisse dans différentes colonies d’Amérique pendant la dernière guerre. Neuchâtel: Imprimerie de la Société Typographique. 1980 edition: Paris: Tallandier.Find this resource:

Giusti, Giuliana (2001). ‘The birth of a functional category: From Latin ILLE to the Romance article and personal pronoun,’ in G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, pp. 157–171. Amsterdam: North Holland.Find this resource:

Givón, Talmy (1976). ‘Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement,’ in C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, pp. 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Givón, Talmy (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Givón, Talmy (ed.) (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, Talmy (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological Introduction, vol. I. Amsterndam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, Talmy (1988). ‘The pragmatics of word order: Predictability, importance and attention,’ in Michael Hammond, Edith Moravcsik, and Jessica Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, pp. 243–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Givón, Talmy (2001) Syntax: An introduction. Vol. I. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Grillo, Nino (2009). ‘Generalized minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism,’ Lingua, vol. 119, pp. 1426–1443.Find this resource:

Gold, E. M. (1967). ‘Language identification in the limit,’ Information and Control, vol. 10, pp. 447–474.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele (2006). Constructions at work. Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goldin-Meadow, Susan (2003). The resilience of language. New York: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

Goldsmith, John (1976). ‘Autosegmental phonology,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology. (p. 575) Find this resource:

Goodman, Morris (1964). A comparative study of Creole French dialects. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Goodman, N. (1967). ‘The epistemological argument,’ Synthese, vol. 17, pp. 23–28.Find this resource:

Goodsitt, J. V., J. L. Morgan, and P. K. Kuhl (1993). ‘Perceptual strategies in prelingual speech segmentation,’ Journal of Child Language, vol. 20, pp. 229–252.Find this resource:

Goswami, G. C., and Jyotiprakash Tamuli (2003). ‘Asamiya,’ in George Cardona and Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, pp. 429–484. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Gougenheim, Georges (1929). Étude sur les périphrases verbales de la langue française. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Find this resource:

Gougenheim, Georges (1951). Grammaire de la langue française du seizième siècle. Lyon: IAC.Find this resource:

Gould, Stephen Jay (1976). ‘In defense of the analog: A commentary to N. Hotton,’ in Bruce R. Masterson, William Hodos, and Harry J. Jerison (eds.), Evolution, brain & behavior: Persistent problems, pp. 175–179. New York: Wiley.Find this resource:

Gould, Stephen Jay (1983). Hens’ teeth and horses’ toes. Norton: New York.Find this resource:

Gould, Stephen Jay (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Graffi, Giorgio (2001). 200 years of syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Graffi, Giorgio (2013). ‘European linguistics after Saussure,’ in Keith Allan (ed.) The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics, pp. 469–484. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph (1963/2007). ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements,’ in Joseph Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Language, pp. 58–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted in Ian Roberts (ed.) (2007), Comparative grammar, Volume 1, 41–74, London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph (1974). Language typology: A historical and analytic overview. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.) (1978). Universals of human language. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Greenfield, Patricia M., Karen Nelson, and Elliot Saltzmann (1972). ‘The development of rulebound strategies for manipulating seriated nesting cups: A parallel between action & grammar,’ Cognitive Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 291–310.Find this resource:

Grewendorf, Günther, and Cecilia Poletto (2005). ‘Von OV zu VO: ein Vergleich zwischen Zimbrisch und Plodarisch,’ in E. Bidese, J. Dow, and T. Stolz (eds.), Das Zimbrische zwischen Germanisch und Romanisch, pp. 114–128. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Find this resource:

Grice, H. Paul (1975). ‘Logic and conversation,’ in P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, pp. 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Grice, H. Paul (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, Jane. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Grodzinsky, Y. (1986). ‘Language deficits and the theory of syntax,’ Brain and Language, vol. 27, pp. 135–159.Find this resource:

Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language disorders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). ‘Trace deletion, θ-roles, and cognitive strategies,’ Brain and Language, vol. 50, pp. 469–497.Find this resource:

Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). ‘The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 23, pp. 1–71.Find this resource:

Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (2013). ‘Spell-out rules,’ in H. Broekhuis and R. Vogel (eds.), Linguistic derivations and filtering: Minimalism and optimality theory, pp. 316–352. Sheffield: Equinox. (p. 576) Find this resource:

Grohmann, Kleanthes K., and Maria Kambanaros (2016). ‘The gradience of multilingualism in typical and impaired language development: Positioning bilectalism within comparative bilingualism,’ Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, p. 37. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00037.Find this resource:

Grohmann, Kleanthes K., E. Theodorou, N. Pavlou, E. Leivada, E. Papadopoulou, and S. Martínez-Ferreiro (2012). ‘The development of object clitic placement in Cypriot Greek and the Romance connection,’ in S. Ferré, P. Prévost, L. Tuller, and R. Zebib (eds.), Selected proceedings of the Romance Turn IV, pp. 128–152. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Find this resource:

Gualmini, A., S. Hulsey, V. Hacquard, and D. Fox (2008). ‘The Question-Answer requirement for scope assignment,’ Natural Language Semantics, vol. 16, pp. 205–238.Find this resource:

Guardiano, Cristina, and Giuseppe Longobardi (2005). ‘Parametric comparison and language taxonomy,’ in M. Batllori, M.-Ll. Hernanz, C. Picallo, and F. Roca (eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation, pp. 149–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Guardiano, Cristina. (2011). ‘Parametric changes in the history of the Greek article,’ in Dianne Jonas, John Whitman, and Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes, pp. 179–197. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Guardiano, Cristina, and Giuseppe Longobardi (to appear). ‘Formal syntactic methods for establishing language phylogenies,’ to appear R. D. Janda, B. D. Joseph and B. Vance (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, Volume II. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Find this resource:

Guardiano, Cristina, Dimitris Michelioudakis, Andrea Ceolin, Monica Alexandrina Irimia, Giuseppe Longobardi, Nina Radkevich, Giusepina Silvestri, and Ioanna Sitaridou (2016). ‘South by Southeast: A syntactic approach to Greek and Romance microvariation,’ L’Italia Dialettale, vol. LXXVII.Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa (1993/1994). ‘Verb syntax in Italian grammar: Finite and non-finite verbs,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 3, pp. 1–40.Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa (1996). ‘Acquisition of Italian interrogatives,’ in Harald Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition, pp. 241–269. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa (2002). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. 1st edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa (forthcoming). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. 2nd edition. Cambridge: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa, and Luigi Rizzi (1996). ‘Null Aux and the acquisition of residual V2,’ in A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amytay, E. Hughes, and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 284–295. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa, Rosalind Thornton, and Kenneth Wexler (1995). ‘Negation in Children’s questions: The case of English,’ in D. MacLaughlin and S. McEwen (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa, and Gennaro Chierchia (1999/2000). ‘Reconstruction in child language,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 8, pp. 129–170.Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa, Gennaro Chierchia, Stephen Crain, F. Foppolo, A. Gualmini, and L. Meroni (2005). ‘Why children sometimes but not always compute scalar implicatures,’ Language and Cognitive processes, vol. 20, pp. 667–676.Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa, Anna Gavarrò, Joke De Lange, and Claudia Caprin (2008). ‘Article omission across child languages,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 15, pp. 89–119. (p. 577) Find this resource:

Guasti, Maria Teresa, C. Branchini, and F. Arosio (2012). ‘Interference in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions.’ Applied Psycholinguistics, vol. 33, pp. 185–223.Find this resource:

Guimarães, M. (2000). ‘In defense of vacuous projections in bare phrase structure,’ M. Guimarães, L. Meroni, C. Rodrigues, and I. San Martin (eds.) University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 9, pp. 90–115. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Gvion, A., and N. Friedmann (2012). ‘Phonological short term memory in conduction aphasia,’ Aphasiology, vol. 26, pp. 579–614.Find this resource:

Haeberli, Eric (1999). ‘Features, categories and the syntax of A-positions: Synchronic and diachronic variation in the Germanic languages,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.Find this resource:

Haeberli, Eric (2004). ‘Syntactic effects of inflectional morphology and competing grammars,’ in E. Fuß and C. Trips (eds.), Diachronic clues to synchronic grammar, pp. 101–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Haegeman, Liliane (1995). ‘Root infinitives, tense, and truncated structures in Dutch,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 4, pp. 205–255.Find this resource:

Haegeman, Liliane (ed.) (1997). The new comparative syntax. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Haegeman, Liliane (1999). ‘Adult null subjects in non pro-drop languages,’ in Marc-Ariel Friedemann and Luigi Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Haegeman, Liliane, and Tabea Ihsane (1999). ‘Subject ellipsis in embedded clauses in English,’ English Language and Linguistics, vol. 3, pp. 117–145.Find this resource:

Haider, Hubert (2012). Symmetry breaking in syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hale, Kenneth (1983). ‘Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 1, pp. 5–47.Find this resource:

Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel J. Keyser. (1993). ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations,’ in Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds.) The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel J. Keyser (2002). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hale, Mark (1996). ‘Theory and method in historical linguistics,’ manuscript, Concordia University.Find this resource:

Hale, Mark (1998). ‘Diachronic syntax,’ Syntax, vol. 1, pp. 1–18.Find this resource:

Hale, Mark (2003). ‘Neogrammarian sound change,’ in B. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, pp. 343–368. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Hale, Mark (2007). Historical linguistics: Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Hale, Mark, and Charles Reiss (2000a). ‘Phonology as cognition,’ in Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr, and Gerald Docherty (eds.), Phonological knowledge: Conceptual & empirical issues, pp. 161–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hale, Mark, and Charles Reiss (2000b). ‘Substance abuse & dysfunctionalism: Current trends in phonology,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 31, pp. 157–169.Find this resource:

Hale, Mark, and Charles Reiss (2008). The phonological enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hall, Robert A., Jr. (1962). ‘The life-cycle of pidgin languages,’ Lingua, vol. 11, pp. 151–156.Find this resource:

Halle, Morris (1962). ‘Phonology in generative grammar,’ Word, vol. 18, pp. 54–72.Find this resource:

Halle, Morris (1997). ‘Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission,’ in B. Bruening, Y. Kang, and M. McGinnis (eds.), MIT working papers in linguistics 30: PF: Papers at the interface, pp. 425–450. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT. (p. 578) Find this resource:

Halle, Morris, and William J. Idsardi (1995). ‘General properties of stress and metrical Structure,’ in John Goldsmith (ed.), A handbook of phonological theory, pp. 403–443. Oxford: Blackwells.Find this resource:

Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz (1993). ‘Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection,’ in Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20; essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Halle, Morris, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hamann, Cornelia (2006). ‘Speculations about early syntax: The production of Wh-questions by normally developing French children and French children with SLI,’ Catalan Journal of Linguistics, vol. 5, pp. 143–189.Find this resource:

Hamburger, Henry, and Stephen Crain (1984).‘Acquisition of cognitive compiling,’ Cognition, vol. 17, pp. 85–136.Find this resource:

Hamburger, Henry, and Kenneth Wexler (1973). ‘Identifiability of a class of transformational grammars,’ in Jaakko Hintikka (ed.), Approaches to natural language, vol. 153–166. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Hamburger, Henry, and Kenneth Wexler (1975). ‘A mathematical theory of learning transformational grammar,’ Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 137–177.Find this resource:

Han, Chung-hye, and Anthony Kroch (2000).‘The rise of do-support in English: Implications for clause structure,’ in M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall, and J. Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, pp. 311–325. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA Publications.Find this resource:

Han, C.-H., Julien Musolino, and Jeff Lidz (2016). ‘Endogenous sources of variation in language acquisition,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, January 11, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517094113.Find this resource:

Hancock, R., and Tom Bever (2013). ‘Genetic factors and normal variation in the organization of language,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 7, pp. 75–95.Find this resource:

Hannon, E., and L. Trainor (2007). ‘Music acquisition: Effects of enculturation and formal training on development,’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 466–472.Find this resource:

Hansson, Gunnar (2001). ‘Theoretical and typological issues in consonant harmony,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Happe, F. (1995). ‘The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism,’ Child Development, vol. 66, pp. 843–855.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi (1995). ‘Subjects, events, and licensing,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Harley, Heidi, and Rolf Noyer (1999). ‘State-of-the-article: Distributed Morphology,’ Glot International, vol. 4, pp. 3–9.Find this resource:

Harman, G. (1967). ‘Some recent issues in linguistics,’ Journal of Philosophy, vol. 64, pp. 75–87.Find this resource:

Harré, Rom (1970). The principles of scientific thinking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Harrell, Richard S. (1962). A short reference grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Find this resource:

Harris, Alice (2000). ‘Word order harmonies and word order change in Georgian,’ in R. Sornicola, E. Poppe, and A. Sisha-Halevy (eds.), Stability, variation, and change of word order patterns over time, pp. 133–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Harris, Alice, and Lyle Campbell (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Harris, Zellig S. (1951). Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (1997). Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (p. 579) Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (2007). ‘Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology,’ Linguistic Typology, vol. 11, pp. 119–132.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (2008). ‘Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals,’ in Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, pp. 75–108. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin, and Matthew S. Dryer (eds.) (2013). The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available online at http://wals.info/ Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie (eds.) (2005). The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Hauser, Marc D. (1996). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hauser, Marc D. (2000). Wild minds: What animals really think. New York: Henry Holt.Find this resource:

Hauser, Marc D. (2008). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Harper Perennial.Find this resource:

Hauser, Marc D., and Carol Fowler (1992). ‘Fundamental frequency declination is not unique to human speech: Evidence from nonhuman primates,’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 91, pp. 363–369.Find this resource:

Hauser, Marc D., and David D. Glynn (2009). ‘Can free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) extract artificially created rules comprised of natural vocalizations?’ Journal of Comparative Psychology, vol. 123, pp. 161–167.Find this resource:

Hauser, Marc D., Susan Carey, and Lillian B. Hauser (2000). ‘Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys,’ Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, vol. 267, pp. 829–833.Find this resource:

Hauser, Marc D., Elissa L. Newport, and Richard N. Aslin (2001). ‘Segmentation of the speech stream in a nonhuman primate: Statistical learning in cotton top tamarins,’ Cognition, vol. 78, pp. B53–B64.Find this resource:

Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky, and W. Tecumseh Fitch (2002).‘The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’ Science, vol. 298, pp. 1569–1579.Find this resource:

Hawkins, John A. (1979). ‘Implicational universals as predictors of language change,’ Language, vol. 55, pp. 618–648.Find this resource:

Hawkins, John A. (1983). Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Hawkins, John A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hawkins, John A. (1997). ‘Some issues in a performance theory of word order,’ in Anna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe, pp. 729–780. Berlin: De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Hawkins, John A. (1999). ‘Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars,’ Language, vol. 75, pp. 244–285.Find this resource:

Hawkins, John A. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hawkins, John A. (2009) ‘An efficiency theory of complexity and related phenomena,’ in Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil, and Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, vol. 252–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hawkins, John A. (2013). ‘Formal and functional approaches to disharmonic word order,’ in Theresa Biberauer and Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word orders, pp. 391–406. Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hawkins, Roger, and Cecilia Yuet-hung Chan (1997). ‘The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The “Failed Functional Features Hypothesis”,’ Second Language Research, vol. 13, pp. 187–226. (p. 580) Find this resource:

Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Hayes, Bruce (1997). ‘Phonetically driven phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and Inductive Grounding,’ manuscript, UCLA.Find this resource:

Hayes, Bruce, and Donca Steriade (2004). ‘Introduction: the phonetic bases of phonological markedness,’ in Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner, and Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically-based phonology, pp. 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hayes, Bruce, Robert Kirchner, and Donca Steriade (eds.) (2004). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hazaël-Massieux, Guy (1996). Les créoles: Problèmes de genèse et de description. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Find this resource:

Hazaël-Massieux, Marie-Christine (ed.) (2008). Textes anciens en créole français de la Caraïbe: Histoire et analyse. Paris: Publibook.Find this resource:

He, Chuansheng. (2010). ‘Verb movement in Archaic Chinese,’ manuscript, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Find this resource:

Heim, Irene (1982). ‘The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Find this resource:

Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Heine, Bernd (2003). ‘Grammaticalization,’ in B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, pp. 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva (2005). Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva (2008). ‘Constraints on contact-induced linguistic change,’ Journal of Language Contact, vol. 2, Thema II, pp. 57–90.Find this resource:

Heinz, Jeffrey N. (2007). ‘Inductive learning of phonotactic patterns,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Unioversity of California at Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Helgason, Petur, and Catherine Ringen (2008). ‘Voicing and aspiration in Swedish stops,’ Journal of Phonetics, vol. 36, pp. 607–628.Find this resource:

Hempel, Carl (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.Find this resource:

Herburger, Elena (2000). What counts: Focus and quantification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hermelin, B. (2002). Bright splinters of the mind: A personal story of research with autistic savants. London: Jessica Kingsley.Find this resource:

Hernández, M., C. Martin, N. Sebastián-Gallés, and A. Costa (2013). ‘Bilingualism beyond language: On the impact of bilingualism on executive control,’ in Cedric Boeckx and Kleanthes K. Grohmann (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics, pp. 160–177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Heycock, Caroline, and Joel Wallenberg (2013). ‘How variational acquisition drives syntactic change: The loss of verb movement in Scandinavian,’ Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, vol. 16, pp. 127–157.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James (1997). ‘Reflections on semantics in generative grammar,’ Lingua, vol. 100, pp. 101–109.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, James (2007). ‘Remarks on compositionality,’ in Gillian Catriona Ramchand and Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the linguistic interfaces, pp. 425–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (p. 581) Find this resource:

Hinterhölzl, Roland (2004). ‘Language change versus grammar change: What diachronic data reveal about the distinction between core grammar and periphery,’ in E. Fuß and C. Trips (eds.), Diachronic clues to synchronic grammar, pp. 131–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Hinterhölzl, Roland (2009). ‘The role of information structure in word order variation and word order change,’ in R. Hinterhölzl and S. Petrova (eds.), Information structure and language change: New approaches to word order variation in Germanic, pp. 45–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Hinterhölzl, Roland, and Svetlana Petrova (2009). ‘From V1 to V2 in Germanic,’ Lingua 120, pp. 315–328.Find this resource:

Hintikka, Jaakko, and Jack Kulas (1983). The game of language: Studies in game-theoretical semantics and its applications. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram (2006a). ‘Internalism about truth,’ Mind and Society, vol. 5, pp. 139–166.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram (2006b). Mind design and minimal syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram (ed.) (2006c). Erkenntnis, vol. 65. Special issue: Prospects for Dualism Interdisciplinary Perspectives.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram (2007). An essay on names and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram (2008). ‘Prospects for an explanatory theory of semantics,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 2, pp. 348–363.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram (2012). ‘Minimalism,’ in R. Kempson, T. Fernando, and N. Asher (eds.), Philosophy of linguistics, pp. 93–141. Amsterdam: North Holland.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram (2014a). ‘The rationality of Case,’ Language Sciences, vol. 46(B), pp. 133–151.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram (2014b). ‘Recursion and truth,’ in P. Speas and T. Roeper (eds.), Recursion: Complexity in cognition, Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Springer, 113–138.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram (2014c). ‘What is un-Cartesian linguistics?’ Biolinguistics, vol. 8, pp. 226–257.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram, and Michelle Sheehan (2013). The philosophy of universal grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram, and J. Rossello (2015). ‘The linguistics of schizophrenia: thought disturbance as language pathology across positive symptoms,’ Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, pp. 971.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram, J. Rossello, O. Mattos, K. Schroeder, and E. Vila (2015). ‘The image of mind in the language of children with autism,’ Frontiers in Psychology (Language Sciences), vol. 6, pp. 841.Find this resource:

Hinzen, Wolfram, Michelle Sheehan, and U. Reichard (2014). ‘Intensionality, grammar, and the sententialist hypothesis,’ in Peter Kosta, Steven Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork, and Lilia Schuerks (eds.) Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, pp. 315–349. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Hiramatsu, K., and Lillo-Martin, D. (1998). ‘Children who judge ungrammatical what they produce,’ in A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, and H. Walsh (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 337–347. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Hirsh-Pasek, Kathryn, and Roberta M. Golinkoff (1996). The origins of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hjelmslev, Louis (1938). ‘Relation de parenté des langues créoles,’ Revue des Etudes Indo-Européennes, vol. 1, pp. 271–286.Find this resource:

Hoberg, Ursula. (1981). Die Wortstellung in der geschriebenen deutschen Gegenwartssprache [Word order in contemporary written German]. Munich: Hueber. (p. 582) Find this resource:

Hockett, C.F. (1963). ‘The problem of universals in human language,’ in J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals in human language, pp. 1–29. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hodges, J., K. Patterson, S. Oxbury, and E. Funnell (1992). ‘Semantic dementia,’ Brain, vol. 115, pp. 1783–1806.Find this resource:

Hodge, S. M., N. Makris, D. N. Kennedy, V. S. Caviness, Jr., J. Howard, L. McGrath, S. Steele, J. A., Frazier, H. Tager-Flusberg, and G. J. Harris (2010). ‘Cerebellum, language, and cognition in autism and specific language impairment,’ Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 40, pp. 300–316.Find this resource:

Hoeksema, Jack (1994). ‘The history of Dutch verb projection raising,’ manuscript, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Find this resource:

Hoelzer, G. A., E. Smith, and J. W. Pepper (2006). ‘On the logical relationship between natural selection and self-organization,’ Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 19, pp. 1785–94.Find this resource:

Hofmeister, Philip, and Ivan A. Sag (2010). ‘Cognitive constraints and island effects,’ Language, vol. 86, pp. 366–415.Find this resource:

Holm, John (2007). ‘Introduction,’ in John Holm and Peter Patrick (eds.). Comparative creole syntax: Parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars. Westminster Creolistics Series, 7. London: Battlebridge Publications.Find this resource:

Holm, John (2008). ‘Creolization and the fate of inflections,’ in Thomas Stolz, Dik Bakker and Rosa Salas Paloma (eds.), Aspects of language contact: New theoretical, methodological and empirical findings with special focus on Romanicisation processes, pp. 299–324. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Holm, John, and Peter Patrick (eds.) (2007). Comparative creole syntax: Parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars. Westminster Creolistics Series, 7. London: Battlebridge Publications.Find this resource:

Holmberg, Anders (1998). ‘Word order variation in some European SVO languages: A parametric approach,’ in Anna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe, pp. 553–598. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Holmberg, Anders (2000). ‘Deriving OV order in Finnish,’ in Peter Svenonius (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, pp. 123–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Holmberg, Anders (2005). ‘Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish,’ Linguistic Inquiry,vol. 36, pp. 533–64.Find this resource:

Holmberg, Anders (2010a). ‘Parameters in minimalist theory: The case of Scandinavian,’ Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 36, pp. 1–48.Find this resource:

Holmberg, Anders (2010b). ‘Null Subject Parameters,’ in Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, and Michelle Sheehan Parametric variation: Null subjects in Minimalist theory, vol., 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack (1995). The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Holmberg, Anders, Aarti Nayudu, and Michelle Sheehan (2009). ‘Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish, and Marathi,’ Studia Linguistica, vol. 63. Special issue: Partial pro-drop, edited by A. Holmberg.Find this resource:

Holmer, A. (2005). ‘Seediq: Antisymmetry and final particles in a Formosan VOS language,’ in Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, and Sheila Dooley (eds.) On the syntax of verb-initial language, pp. 175–202. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Hong, Sungshim (1985). ‘A and Aʹ binding in Korean and English: Government-binding parameters,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Find this resource:

Hoover, J., H. Storkel, and M. L. Rice (2012). ‘The interface between neighborhood density and optional infinitives: Normal development and specific language impairment,’ Journal of Child Language, vol. 39, pp. 835–862. (p. 583) Find this resource:

Hopp, Holger (2002). ‘Constraints on word order variation: Learnability and UG in advanced English-German and Japanese-German interlanguage,’ MA thesis, University of Durham.Find this resource:

Hopp, Holger (2005). ‘Constraining second language word order optionality: Scrambling in advanced English-German and Japanese-German interlanguage,’ Second Language Research, vol. 21, pp. 34–71.Find this resource:

Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Traugott (2003). Grammaticalization. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Horning, J. (1969). ‘A study of grammatical inference,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Find this resource:

Hornstein, Norbert (1999). ‘Movement and control,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 30, pp. 69–96.Find this resource:

Hornstein, Norbert (2001). Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Hornstein, Norbert (2009). A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hornstein, Norbert, and Cedric Boeckx. (2009). ‘Approaching universals from below,’ in M. Christiansen. C. Collins, and S. Edelman (eds.), Language universals, pp. 79–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hornstein, Norbert, and David W. Lightfoot (1981). ‘Introduction,’ in Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition, vol. 9–31. Norbert Hornstein and David W. Lightfoot (eds.), New York: Longman.Find this resource:

Hornstein, Norbert, Sara Rosen, and Juan Uriagereka (2002). ‘Integrals,’ in Juan Uriagereka (ed.), Derivations: The dynamics of syntax, pp. 179–191. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Howe, Catherine (2000). ‘Développement d’une théorie de la temporalité: les cas du créole haïtien et du papiamento,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Provence, France.Find this resource:

Howe, Darin (2004). ‘Vocalic dorsality in Revised Articulator Theory,’ manuscript, University of Calgary. http://www.ucalgary.ca/dflynn/files/dflynn/Howe2004.pdf (retrieved July 29, 2008) http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/phonet/indgroun.pdf (retrieved May 2012).

Howlin, P., S. Goode, J. Hutton, and M. Rutter (2009). ‘Savant skills in autism: Psychometric approaches and parental reports,’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, vol. 364, pp. 1359–1367.Find this resource:

Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg (1996). ‘The decline of OV word order in the Icelandic VP: A diachronic study,’ Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, vol. 57, pp. 92–141.Find this resource:

Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg (2000). Word order change in Icelandic: From OV to VO. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson, Anna-Lena Wiklund, and Kristine Bentzen (2006). ‘The Tromsø guide to Scandinavian verb movement,’ Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, vol. 78, pp. 1–36.Find this resource:

Huang, C.-T. James (1982 [1998]). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology. Published in 1998 by Garland Publishing.Find this resource:

Huang, C.-T. James (1984). ‘On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 15, pp. 531–574.Find this resource:

Huang, C.-T. James (1997). ‘On lexical structure and syntactic projection,’ Chinese Languages and Linguistics, vol. 3, pp. 45–89.Find this resource:

Huang, C.-T. James (2005). ‘Syntactic analyticity: The other end of the parameter,’ lecture notes, 2005 LSA Linguistic Institute, Harvard University and MIT.Find this resource:

Huang, C.-T. James (2006). ‘Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view,’ Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan, vol. 253, pp. 1–43.Find this resource:

Huang, C.-T. James (2009). ‘Lexical decomposition, silent categories and the localizer phrase,’ Yuyanxue Luncong, vol. 39, pp. 86–122. (p. 584) Find this resource:

Huang, C.-T. James (2013). ‘Macro- and micro-variations and parametric theory in minimalism,’ in Yung-O Biq and Lindsey Chen (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international symposium on Chinese languages and linguistics (IsCLL-13), National Taiwan Normal University and Academia Sinica, Taipei, June 2012, pp. 1–18.Find this resource:

Huang, C.-T. James (2015). ‘On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory,’ in Y.-H. Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson, and W.-T. Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese syntactic in cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 1–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Huffman, Marie, and Thomas Hinnebusch (1998). ‘The phonetic structure of “voiceless” nasals in Pokomo: Implications for sound change,’ Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 1–20.Find this resource:

Hulk, Aafke, and Natasha Müller (2000). ‘Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics,’ Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 3, pp. 227–244.Find this resource:

Hume, David (1739). A treatise of human nature, Volume I. London: John Noon.Find this resource:

Hurford, James R. (2007). The origins of meaning: Language in the light of evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hurford, James R. (2012). The origins of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hyams, Nina (1983). ‘Acquisition of parametrized grammars,’ Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY.Find this resource:

Hyams, Nina (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Hyams, Nina (1992). ‘A reanalysis of null subjects in child language,’ in J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck, and T. Roeper (eds.) Theoretical issues in language acquisition: Continuity and change in development, pp. 249–268. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Find this resource:

Hyman, Larry (1976). ‘Phonologization,’ in A. Juilland (ed.) Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, pp. 107–118. Saratoga: Anma Libri.Find this resource:

Hymes, Dell H. (1966). ‘Two types of linguistic relativity,’ in W. Bright, Sociolinguistics, pp. 114–158. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Hymes, Dell H. (ed.) (1971). Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Idsardi, William J. (2008). ‘Combinatorics for metrical feet,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 2, pp. 233–236.Find this resource:

Idsardi, William J., and Juan Uriagereka (2009). ‘Metrical combinatorics and the real half of the Fibonacci sequence,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 3, pp. 404–406.Find this resource:

Ingham, Richard (2002). ‘Negated subject and object positions in 15th century non-literary English,’ Language Variation and Change, vol. 14, pp. 291–322.Find this resource:

Inkelas, Sharon, and Orhan Orgun (1995). ‘Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish,’ Language, vol. 71, pp. 763–93.Find this resource:

Inoue, Sana, and Tetsuro Matsuzawa (2009). ‘Acquisition & memory of sequence order in young & adult chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).’ Animal Cognition, vol. 12, pp. S59-S69.Find this resource:

Irwin, T. H. (1999). ‘The Theory of forms,’ in Gail Fine (ed.), Plato, pp. 143–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Itkonen, Esa (2013). ‘Philosophy of linguistics,’ in Keith Allan (ed.) The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics, pp. 747–774. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Itō, Junko (1986). ‘Syllable theory in prosodic phonology,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Iverson, Gregory, and Ahrong Lee (2006). ‘Perception of contrast in Korean loanword adaptation,’ Korean Linguistics, vol. 13, pp. 49–87.Find this resource:

Iverson, Gregory, and Joseph Salmons (2011). ‘Final devoicing and final laryngeal neutralization,’ in Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Beth Hume, and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, pp. 1622–1643. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (p. 585) Find this resource:

Iverson, J. M., and S. Goldin-Meadow (2005). ‘Gesture paves the way for language development,’ Psychological Science, vol. 16, pp. 367–371.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (2003). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray, and Steven Pinker (2005). ‘The nature of the language faculty & its implications for evolution of language (reply to Fitch, Hauser, & Chomsky),’ Cognition, vol. 97, pp. 211–225.Find this resource:

Jaeggli, Osvaldo (1980). ‘Remarks on to contraction,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 11, pp. 239–246.Find this resource:

Jakobson, Roman (1931). ‘Prinzipien der historischen Phonologie,’ Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, vol. 4, pp. 252ff.Find this resource:

Jakobson, Roman (1963). ‘Implications of language universals for linguistics,’ in J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, pp. 263–278. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jakubowicz, C., and L. Nash (2001). ‘Functional categories and syntactic operations in (ab)normal language acquisition,’ Brain and Language, vol. 77, pp. 321–339.Find this resource:

Jakubowicz, Celia, and C. Rigaut (2000). ‘L’acquisition des clitiques nominatifs et des clitiques objets en français,’ Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, vol. 45, pp. 119–157.Find this resource:

Jakubowicz, C., L. Nash, C. Rigaut, and C.-L. Gerard (1998). ‘Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 7, pp. 113–160.Find this resource:

Janda, Richard D., and Brian D. Joseph (2003). ‘Introduction,’ in B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, pp. 1–180. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Janssen, Theo M.V. (1996). ‘Compositionality,’ in Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 417–473. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Jaspers, D. (2012) ‘Logic and colour,’ Logica Universalis 6, pp. 227–248.Find this resource:

Jaszczolt, K. (2013). ‘First-person reference in discourse: Aims and strategies,’ Journal of Pragmatics 48, pp. 57–70.Find this resource:

Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics: Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Jespersen, Otto (1917). Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst.Find this resource:

Jespersen, Otto (1924). Philosophy of grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Find this resource:

Jewett, F. G. (1914). The next generation: A study of the physiology of inheritance. Boston, MA: Ginn and Co.Find this resource:

Johnson, C. Douglas (1970). ‘Formal aspects of phonological representation,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Johnson, Jacqueline, and Elissa Newport (1991).‘Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language,’ Cognition, vol. 39, pp. 215–258.Find this resource:

Johnson, Kent (2004). ‘Gold’s theorem and cognitive science,’ Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 571–592.Find this resource:

Johnson, Kyle B. (1994). ‘Bridging the gap,’ manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Johnson-Pynn, Julie, Dorothy M. Fragaszy, Elizabeth M. Hirsh, Karen E. Brakke, and Patricia M. Greenfield (1999). ‘Strategies used to combine seriated cups by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and capuchins (Cebus apella),’ Journal of Comparative Psychology, vol. 113, pp. 137–148. (p. 586) Find this resource:

Joos, M. (ed.) (1957). Readings in linguistics: The development of descriptive linguistics in America since 1925. Washington: ACLS.Find this resource:

Joshi, Aravind K. (1985). ‘Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions?’ In David R. Dowty, Lauri Karttunen, and Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), Natural Language Parsing, pp. 206–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Julien, Marit (2002). Syntactic heads and word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Jung, Hakyung, and Krzysztof Migdalski (2015). ‘Degrammaticalization of pronominal clitics in Slavic,’ paper presented at the 17th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference, University of Reykjavik.Find this resource:

Kager, Rene (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kambanaros, Maria (2010). ‘Action and object naming versus verb and noun retrieval in connected speech: Comparisons in late bilingual Greek–English anomic speakers,’ Aphasiology, vol. 24, pp. 210–230.Find this resource:

Kambanaros, Maria, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann (2015). ‘Grammatical class effects across impaired child and adult populations,’ Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, pp. 1670.Find this resource:

Kambanaros, Maria, Kleanthes K. Grohmann, M. Michaelides, and E. Theodorou (2013). ‘Comparing multilingual children with SLI to their bilectal peers: Evidence from object and action picture naming,’ International Journal of Multilingualism, vol. 10, pp. 60–81.Find this resource:

Kambanaros, Maria, Kleanthes K. Grohmann, M. Michaelides, and E. Theodorou (2014). ‘On the nature of verb–noun dissociations in bilectal SLI: A psycholinguistic perspective from Greek,’ Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 17, pp. 169–188.Find this resource:

Kambanaros, Maria, and W. van Steenbrugge (2013). ‘Lexical retrieval deficits in anomic aphasia and specific language impairment (SLI): More similar than different? Grammatical class and context effects,’ Linguistic Variation, vol. 13, pp. 237–256.Find this resource:

Kambanaros, Maria, M. Michaelides, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann (2015). ‘Measuring word retrieval deficits in a multilingual child with SLI: Is there a better language?’ Journal of Neurolinguistics, vol. 34, pp. 112–130.Find this resource:

Kamp, H. (1981). ‘A Theory of truth and semantic representation,’ in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language, pp. 1–42. Amsterdam: Mathematics Center.Find this resource:

Kang, Yoonjung (2003). ‘Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean,’ Phonology, vol. 20, pp. 219–273.Find this resource:

Kanno, Kazue (1997). ‘The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English Speakers,’ Second Language Research, vol. 13, pp. 265–287.Find this resource:

Katsos, Napoleon, and D. V. M. Bishop (2011). ‘Pragmatic tolerance: Implication for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature,’ Cognition, vol. 120, pp. 67–81.Find this resource:

Katz, Jerrold J. (1981). Language and other abstract objects. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Katz, Jerrold J., and Jerry A. Fodor (1963). ‘The structure of a semantic theory,’ Language, vol. 39, pp. 170–210.Find this resource:

Katz, Jerrold J., and Paul M. Postal (1964). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Katz, Jonah, and David Pesetsky (2011). ‘The identity thesis for language and music,’ lingbuzz/000959.Find this resource:

Kauffman, Stuart (1993). Origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud (1985). ‘The internal structure of phonological elements: A theory of charm and government,’ Phonology Yearbook, vol. 2, pp. 305–328. (p. 587) Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (1975). French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (1984). Connectedness and binary branching. Foris: Dordrecht.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (1989). ‘Null subjects and clitic climbing,’ in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, pp. 239–261. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (1991). ‘Romance clitics, verb-movement and PRO,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 22, pp. 647–686.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (2000). Parameters and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (2005a). ‘Remarks on Comparative Syntax, with special reference to English and French,’ in G. Cinque and R. Kayne (eds.), Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, pp. 3–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (2005b). Movement and silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (2010a). ‘Antisymmetry and the lexicon,’ in Anna Maria di Sciullo and Cedric Boeckx (eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise, pp. 329–353. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (2010b). Comparisons and contrasts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kayne, Richard S. (2013). ‘Comparative syntax,’ Lingua, vol. 130, pp. 132–151.Find this resource:

Kazanina, Nina. (2005). ‘The acquisition and processing of backwards anaphora,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Find this resource:

Kazanina, Nina, and Colin Phillips (2001). ‘Coreference in child Russian: Distinguishing syntactic and discourse constraints,’ in Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez, and Aimee Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University Conference for Language Development, pp. 413–424. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward (1994). ‘Creating anaphors: An historical study of the English reflexive pronouns’. Manuscript, UCLA.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward (2002). ‘Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English,’ in D. Minkova and R. Stockwell (eds.), Studies in the history of English: A millennial perspective, pp. 325–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward, and Bernard Comrie (1977). ‘Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 8, pp. 63–99.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward, and Dennis Paperno (eds.) (2012). Handbook of quantifiers in natural languages. Dordrecht: Springer.Find this resource:

Kegl, Judy, Anne Senghas, and Marie Coppola (1999). ‘Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua,’ in M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development, pp. 179–237. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Kemenade, Ans van (1987). Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Kemenade, Ans van, and Nigel Vincent (eds.) (1997). Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Chris (2005). ‘Parameters of comparison,’ manuscript and PowerPoint handout, University of Chicago.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Chris (2007). ‘Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives,’ manuscript, University of Chicago.Find this resource:

Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Kenstowicz, Michael, and Charles Kisseberth (1979). Generative phonology: Description and theory. San Diego: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Kihm, Alain (2011). ‘Pidgin-creoles as a scattered sprachbund: Comparing Kriyol and Nubi,’ Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, vol. 26, pp. 43–88. (p. 588) Find this resource:

Kim, Jong-Bok (2000). The grammar of negation: A constraint-based approach. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Carol, and Paul Kiparsky (1970). ‘Fact,’ in M. Bierwisch and K. E. Heidolph (eds.), Progress in Linguistics, pp. 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul.(1965). ‘Phonological change,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1968). ‘Linguistic universals and linguistic change,’ in E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, pp. 171–202. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1973). ‘Phonological representations,’ in O. Fujimura (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic theory, pp. 1–135. Tokyo: TEC Corporation.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1982). ‘Word-formation and the lexicon,’ in F. Ingemann (ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, pp., 2–29. University of Kansas.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1985). ‘Some consequences of lexical phonology,’ Phonology Yearbook, vol. 2, pp. 82–138.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1993). ‘Blocking in nonderived environments,’ in Sharon Hargus and Ellen Kaisse (eds.), Studies in lexical phonology, pp. 227–314. San Diego: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1995). ‘Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax,’ in Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, pp. 140–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1996). ‘The shift to head-initial VP in Germanic,’ in H. Thráinsson, S. D. Epstein and S. Peter (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax II, pp. 140–179. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (1997). ‘The rise of positional licensing,’ in Ans van Kemenade and Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, pp. 460–493. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (2006). ‘Amphichronic linguistics vs. Evolutionary Phonology,’ Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 32, pp. 217–236.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul (2008). ‘Universals constrain change, change results in typological generalizations,’ in Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, pp. 25–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kitahara, Hisatsugu (2003). ‘Acoustic perception in human newborns & cotton-top tamarins,’ Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural & Linguistic Studies, vol. 35, pp. 31–41.Find this resource:

Kjelgaard, M., and H. Tager-Flusberg (2001). ‘An investigation of language impairment in autism: Implications for genetic subgroups,’ Language and Cognitive Processes, vol. 16, pp. 287–308.Find this resource:

Klein, Elaine (1993). Toward second language acquisition: A study of null-prep. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Klein, Ewan, and Ivan A. Sag (1985). ‘Type-driven translation,’ Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 8, pp. 163–202.Find this resource:

Klein, Wolfgang, and Clive Perdue (1997). ‘The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?).’ Second Language Research, vol. 13, pp. 301–347.Find this resource:

Klima, Edward (1964). ‘Relatedness between grammatical systems,’ Language, vol. 40, pp. 1–20.Find this resource:

Klima, Edward (1965). ‘Studies in diachronic transformational syntax,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Find this resource:

Klima, Edward, and Ursula Bellugi (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Kluender, Robert, and Marta Kutas (1993). ‘Subjacency as a processing phenomenon,’ Language and Cognitive Processes, vol. 8, pp. 573–633. (p. 589) Find this resource:

Koeneman, Olaf, and Hedde Zeijlstra (2014). ‘The Rich Agreement Hypothesis rehabilitated,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 45, pp. 571–615.Find this resource:

Kohl, K. (1999). ‘An analysis of finite parameter learning in linguistic space,’ MA thesis, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Kohnert, K., and J. Windsor (2004). ‘The search for common ground: Part II. Nonlinguistic performance by linguistically diverse learners,’ Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, vol. 47, pp. 891–903.Find this resource:

Kolk, H. H. J. (1998). ‘Disorders of syntax in aphasia, linguistic-descriptive and processing approaches,’ in B. Stemmer and H. Whitaker (eds.), Handbook of neurolinguistics, pp. 249–260. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Koopman, Hilda (1984). The syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to universal grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Koopman, Hilda, and Claire Lefebvre (1982). ‘Pu: Marqueur de mode, proposition et complémenteur,’ in Holly Magloire-Holly and Nani Piou (eds.), Syntaxe de I’Haïtien, pp., 64–91. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Find this resource:

Korn, Agnes (2003). ‘Balochi and the concept of North-Western Iranian,’ in Carina Jahani and Agnes Korn (eds.), The Baloch and their neighbours: Ethnic and linguistic contact in Balochistan in historical and modern times, pp. 49–60. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Find this resource:

Korn, Agnes (2009). ‘Lengthening of i and u in Persian,’ in Werner Sundermann, Almut Hintze, and François de Blois (eds.), Exegisti monumenta: Festschrift in honour of Nicholas Sims-Williams, pp. 197–213. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Find this resource:

Kornfilt, Jaklin (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Koshal, Sanyukta (1979). Ladakhi grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Find this resource:

Koukoulioti, V. (2010). ‘Production of modal and negative particles in Greek aphasia,’ Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, vol. 24, pp. 669–690.Find this resource:

Koutsoudas, Andreas, Gerald Sanders, and Craig Noll (1974). ‘The application of phonological rules,’ Language, vol. 50, pp. 1–28.Find this resource:

Kouwenberg, Silvia (2010). ‘Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 2,’ Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, vol. 25, pp. 359–380.Find this resource:

Krashen, Stephen D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (2009). ‘Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 40, pp. 187–237.Find this resource:

Kripke, Saul (1976). ‘Is there a problem about substitutional quantification?’ In Gareth Evans and John H. McDowell (eds.), Truth and meaning: Essays in semantics, pp. 325–419. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kripke, Saul (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Kripke, Saul (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Kroch, Anthony (1989). ‘Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change,’ Journal of Language Variation and Change, vol. 1, pp. 199–244.Find this resource:

Kroch, Anthony (1994). ‘Morphosyntactic variation,’ in K. Beals, J. Denton, B. Knippen, L. Melnar, H. Suzuki, and E. Zeinfeld (eds.), Proceedings of the thirtieth annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Vol. II, pp. 180–201. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Find this resource:

Kroch, Anthony (2001). ‘Syntactic change,’ in M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, pp. 699–729. Oxford: Blackwell. (p. 590) Find this resource:

Kroch, Anthony, and Ann Taylor (1997). ‘Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact,’ in Ans van Kemenade and Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, pp. 297–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kroch, Anthony, and Ann Taylor (2000). ‘Verb-complement order in Middle English,’ in Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas, and Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, pp. 132–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kroch, Anthony, Ann Taylor, and Donald Ringe (2000). ‘The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change,’ in S. C. Herring, P. van Reenen, and L. Schøsler (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages, pp. 353–391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Kubuş, O. (2010). ‘Relative clause constructions in Turkish Sign Language,’ poster presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Find this resource:

Kuhl, Patricia K. (1991). ‘Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not,’ Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 50, pp. 93–107.Find this resource:

Kuhl, Patricia K. (2000). ‘A new view of language acquisition,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 97, pp. 11850–11857.Find this resource:

Kuhl, Patricia K., and J. Miller (1975). ‘Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants,’ Science, vol. 190.4209, pp. 69–72.Find this resource:

Kuhl, Patricia K., F.-M. Tsao, and H.-M. Liu (2003). ‘Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 100, pp. 9096–9101.Find this resource:

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Kuno, Susumu (1987). Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse, and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Kuno, Susumu, and Ken-ichi Takami (1993). Grammar and discourse principles: Functional syntax and GB theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Labov, William (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Labov, William (2007). ‘Transmission and diffusion,’ Language, vol. 83, pp. 344–387.Find this resource:

Labov, William, Ingrid Rosenfelder, and Josef Fruehwald (2013). ‘One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis,’ Language, vol. 89, pp. 30–65.Find this resource:

Lachlan, Robert F., and Stephen Nowicki (2015). ‘Context-dependent categorical perception in a songbird,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, vol. 112, pp. 1892–1897.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George (1971). ‘On generative semantics,’ in D. D. Steinberg and L. A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, pp., 232–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George, and Rafael Nuñez (2001). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George, and Haj Ross (1976). ‘Is Deep Structure necessary?’ In James D. McCawley (ed.), Notes from the linguistic underground: Syntax and semantics, vol. 7, pp. 159–164. New York: Academic Press. (p. 591) Find this resource:

Lakoff, Robin (1969). Review of Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Language, vol. 45, pp. 343–364.Find this resource:

Lalla, Barbara, and Jean D’Costa (eds.) (1989). Voices in exile: Jamaican texts of the 18th and 19th centuries. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Find this resource:

Lamarre, Christine (2008). ‘Divergent evolution of directionals in two non-standard varieties of Sinitic,’ paper presented at the symposium The Past Meets the Present, Academia Sinica.Find this resource:

Lambek, Joachim (1958). ‘The mathematics of sentence structure,’ The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 65, pp. 154–170.Find this resource:

Landau, Barbara, and Lila Gleitman (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Landau, Idan (2006). ‘Severing the distribution of PRO from Case,’ Syntax, vol. 9, pp. 153–170.Find this resource:

Landau, Idan (2008). ‘Two routes of control: Evidence from case transmission in Russian,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 26, pp. 877–924.Find this resource:

Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Larson, Richard (1988). ‘On the double object construction,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 19, pp. 335–392.Find this resource:

Larson, Richard (1998). ‘Events and modification in nominals,’ in D. Strolovitch and A. Lawson (eds.) Proceedings of SALT VIII, pp. 145–168. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Find this resource:

Larson, Richard, and Gabriel Segal (1995). Knowledge of meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lasersohn, Peter (2005). ‘Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste.’ Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 28, pp. 643–686.Find this resource:

Lasnik, Howard (1976). ‘Remarks on coreference,’ Linguistic Analysis, vol. 2, pp. 1–22.Find this resource:

Lasnik, Howard (1989). ‘On certain substitutes for negative data,’ in Robert J. Matthews and William Demopoulos (eds.), Learnability and linguistic theory, pp. 89–105. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Lasnik, Howard, and Terje Lohndal (2013). ‘Brief overview of the history of generative syntax,’ in Marcel den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, pp. 26–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito (1984). ‘On the nature of proper government,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 15, pp. 235–289.Find this resource:

Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito (1992). Move alpha: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lasnik, Howard, and Juan Uriagereka (2002). ‘On the poverty of the challenge,’ The Linguistic Review, vol. 19, pp. 147–150.Find this resource:

Lasnik, Howard, and Juan Uriagereka (2007). ‘Structure dependence, the rational learner, and Putnam’s “sane person”,’ MIT Workshop: Where Does Syntax Come From? MIT.Find this resource:

Law, Vivienne (2003). The History of linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lazar, R. M., and D. Antoniello (2008). ‘Variability in recovery from aphasia,’ Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, vol. 8, pp. 497–502.Find this resource:

Leben, William (1973). ‘Suprasegmental phonology,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Lefebvre, Claire (1998). Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lefebvre, Claire, Lydia White, and Christine Jourdan (eds.) (2006). L2 acquisition and creole genesis: Dialogues. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (p. 592) Find this resource:

Legate, Julie A., and Charles Yang (2002). ‘Empirical re-assessment of stimulus poverty arguments,’ The Linguistic Review, vol. 19, pp. 151–162.Find this resource:

Legate, Julie A., and Charles Yang (2007). ‘Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 14, pp. 315–344.Find this resource:

Lehmann, Christian (2002). Thoughts on grammaticalization. Second edition. Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt.Find this resource:

Lehmann, Winfried P. (1973). ‘A structural principle of language and its implications,’ Language, vol. 49, pp. 47–66.Find this resource:

Lehmann, Winfred P. (1978a). ‘The great underlying groundplans,’ in W. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, pp 3–55. Austin: University of Texas Press.Find this resource:

Lehmann, Winfried P. (ed.) (1978b). Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language. Austin: University of Texas Press.Find this resource:

Lehrdal, F., and Ray Jackendoff (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Leiss, E. (2009). Sprachphilosophie. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Leivada, E. (2012). ‘A non-parametric approach to universal grammar within the biolinguistic program,’ MA thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.Find this resource:

Lenneberg, Eric (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Find this resource:

Lenneberg, Eric (1975). Foundations of language development (2 vols.). New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Leonard, L. (1989). ‘Language learnability and specific language impairment in children,’ Applied Psycholinguistics, vol. 10, pp. 179–202.Find this resource:

Leonard, L. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Leonard, L. (2014). ‘Children with specific language impairment and their contribution to the study of language development.’ Journal of Child Language, vol. 41, pp. 38–47.Find this resource:

Leonard, L., U. Bortolini, M.-C. Caselli, K. McGregor, and L. Sabbadini (1992). ‘Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: The status of features in the underlying grammar,’ Language Acquisition, vol. 2, pp. 151–179.Find this resource:

Leonard, L., S. Ellis Weismer, C. A. Miller, D. Francis, J. B. Tomblin, and R. Kail (2007). ‘Speed of processing, working memory, and language impairment in children,’ Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 50, pp. 408–428.Find this resource:

Lepsius, Richard, and William Dwight Whitney (1865). ‘On the relation of vowels & consonants,’ Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 8, pp. 357–373.Find this resource:

Leslau, Wolf (1945). ‘The influence of Cushitic on the Semitic languages of Ethiopia: A problem of substratum,’Word, vol. 1, pp. 59–82.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav (2005). Argument realization, research surveys in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Levin, Juliette (1985). ‘A metrical theory of syllabicity,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). ‘Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of Binding and Control phenomena,’ Journal of Linguistics, vol. 23, pp. 379–434.Find this resource:

Levy, Y., and G. Kavé (1999). ‘Language breakdown and linguistic theory: A tutorial overview,’ Lingua, vol. 107, pp. 95–143.Find this resource:

Lewis, David K. (1981). ‘Index, context and content,’ in Stig Kanger and Sven Ohman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar, pp. 79–101. Dordrecht: Reidel. (p. 593) Find this resource:

Lewis, J. D., and J. Elman (2001). ‘Learnability and poverty of stimulus arguments revisited,’ in B. Skarabela, S. Fish, and A.H. Do (eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual Boston University conference on language development, pp. 359–370. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Liddell, S. (1978). ‘Nonmanual signals and relative clauses in ASL,’ in P. Siple (ed.) Understanding language through sign language research, pp. 59–90. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Lidz, Jeffrey (2010). ‘Language learning and language universals,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 4, pp. 201–217.Find this resource:

Lidz, Jeffrey, and Annie Gagliardi (2015). ‘How nature meets nurture: Statistical learning and Universal Grammar,’ Annual Review of Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 333–353.Find this resource:

Lidz, Jeffrey, and Julien Musolino (2002). ‘Children’s command of quantification,’ Cognition, vol. 84, pp. 113–154.Find this resource:

Lidz, Jeffrey, Sandra Waxman, and Jennifer Freedman (2003).‘What infants know about syntax but couldn’t have learned: Experimental evidence for syntactic structure at 18 months,’ Cognition, vol. 89, pp. B65-B73.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, David W. (1979). Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, David W. (1982). The language lottery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, David W. (1991). How to set parameters: Degree-0 learnability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, David W. (1997). ‘Catastrophic change and learning theory,’ Lingua, vol. 100, pp. 171–192.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, David W. (1999). The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, David W. (ed.) (2002). Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, David W. (2006). How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lillo-Martin, Diane (1991). Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the null argument parameters. Netherlands: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Lillo-Martin, Diane (1992). ‘Sentences as islands: on the boundedness of A′-movement in American Sign Language,’ in H. Goodluck and M. Rochemont (eds.), Island constraints, pp. 259–274. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Edward Klima (1990). ‘Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory,’ in S. Fischer and P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, vol. 1: Linguistics, pp. 191–210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Lin, T.-H. Jonah (2001). ‘Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Find this resource:

Lin, T.-H. Jonah, and C.-Y. Cecilia Liu (2005). ‘Coercion, event structure and syntax,’ Nanzan Linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 9–31.Find this resource:

Lindblom, Bjorn, Peter MacNeilage, and Michael Studdert-Kennedy (1984). ‘Self-organizing processes and the explanation of language universals,’ in B. Butterworth, C. Bernard, and O. Dahl (eds.), Explanations for language universals, pp. 181–203. Mouton: Berlin.Find this resource:

Liu, C.-S. Luther (2010). ‘The positive morpheme in Chinese and the adjectival structure,’ Lingua, vol. 120, pp. 1010–1056.Find this resource:

Liu, Danqing (2002). ‘Hanyu fangyan de yuxu leixing bijiao [A comparative study of word order types among Chinese dialects],’ in Youwei Shi (ed.) Cong yuyi leixing dao leixing bijiao (p. 594) [From Semantic Types to Typological Comparison], pp. 222–244. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Find this resource:

Lohndal, Terje (2012). ‘Without specifiers: Phrase structure and events,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.Find this resource:

Lohndal, Terje (2014). Phrase structure and argument structure: A case study of the syntax–semantics interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Lombardi, Linda (2001). ‘Why place and voice are different: Constraint-specific alternations in Optimality Theory,’ in Linda Lombardi (ed.), Segmental phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and representations, pp. 13–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Long, Edward (1774). The history of Jamaica. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Edition 2002.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe (1994). ‘Reference and proper names,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol 25, pp. 609–665.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe (1996). ‘The syntax of N-raising: A Minimalist Theory,’ OTS Working Papers in Linguistics, Utrecht.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe (2001a). ‘Formal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 32, pp. 275–302.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe (2001b). ‘How comparative is semantics? A unified parametric theory of bare nouns and proper names,’ Natural Language Semantics, vol. 9, pp. 335–369.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe (2003). ‘Methods in parametric linguistics and cognitive history,’ Linguistic Variation Yearbook, pp. 101–138.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe (2005). ‘A minimalist program for parametric linguistics?’ In Hans Broekhuis, Riny Huybregts, Uri Kleinhenz, and Jan Koster (eds.), Organizing grammar: A Festschrift for Henk van Riemsdijk, pp. 407–414. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe (2008). ‘Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters,’ in A. Klinge and H. Müller (eds.), Essays on nominal determination: From morphology to discourse management, pp. 189–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe (2016). ‘Principles, parameters and schemata: A constructivist UG,’ manuscript, University of York, Università di Trieste.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe, and Cristina Guardiano (2009). ‘Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness,’ Lingua, vol. 119, pp. 1679–1706, John Nerbonne (ed.), special issue: The Forests behind the Trees.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe, Cristina Guardiano, Giuseppina Silvestri, Alessio Boattini, and Andrea Ceolin (2013). ‘Toward a syntactic phylogeny of modern Indo-European languages,’ Journal of Historical Linguistics, vol. 3, pp. 122–152, Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas (eds.), special issue: Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe, Silvia Ghirotto, Cristina Guardiano, Francesca Tassi, Andrea Benazzo, Andrea Ceolin, and Guido Barbujani (2015). ‘Across language families: Genome diversity mirrors linguistic variation within Europe,’ American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 157, pp. 630–640.Find this resource:

Longobardi, Giuseppe, Andrea Ceolin, Luca Bortolussi, Cristina Guardiano, Monica Alexandrina Irimia, Dimitris Michelioudakis, Nina Radkevich, Andrea Sgarro (2016). ‘Mathematical modeling of grammatical diversity supports the historical reality of formal syntax.’ Downloadable at: https://publikationen.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/handle/10900/68704.

Lowe, E. J. (2008). Personal agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ludlow, Peter (2003). ‘Referential semantics for I-languages,’ in Louise M. Anthony and Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and his critics, pp. 140–161. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. (p. 595) Find this resource:

Ludlow, Peter (2011). The philosophy of generative grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Luís, Ana (2008). ‘Tense marking and inflectional morphology in Indo-Portuguese creoles,’ in Susanne Michaelis (ed.), Roots of creole structures: Weighing the contribution of substrates and superstrates, pp. 83–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Lukyanenko, Cynthia, Anastasia Conroy, and Jeffrey Lidz (2014) ‘Is she patting Katie? Constraints on pronominal reference in 30-month-olds,’ Language Learning and Development, vol. 10, pp. 328–344.Find this resource:

Lycan, W. (2003). ‘Chomsky on the mind–body problem,’ in Louise M. Anthony and Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and his critics, pp. 11–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Maat, Jaap (2013). ‘General or universal grammar from Plato to Chomsky,’ in Keith Allan (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics, pp. 397–418. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Mackenzie, D. (1967). ‘Notes on the transcription of Pahlavi,’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, vol. 30, pp. 17–29.Find this resource:

Mackenzie, D. (1971). A concise Pahlavi dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Maddieson, Ian (2013). ‘Tone,’ in Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.) The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/13, accessed on April 14, 2015.Find this resource:

Magee, Bryan (1978). Talking philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Magloire-Holly, Hélène (1981). ‘Les modaux en haïtien,’ Master’s thesis, Université du Québec à Montréal.Find this resource:

Magnus, Margaret (2013) ‘A history of sound symbolism,’ in Keith Allan (ed.) The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics, pp. 191–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Mahajan, Anoop (1994). ‘Universal Grammar and the typology of ergative languages,’ manuscript, UCLA.Find this resource:

Major, Roy (1987). ‘A model for interlanguage phonology,’ in G. Ioup and S. Weinberger (eds.), Interlanguage phonology, pp. 101–124. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Find this resource:

Major, Roy (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Find this resource:

Manika, S., Spyridoula Varlokosta, and Kenneth Wexler (2011). ‘The lack of omission of clitics in Greek children with SLI: An experimental study,’ in N. Danis, K. Mesh, and H. Sung (eds.), BUCLD 35: Proceedings of the 35th Boston University conference on language development, vol. 2, pp. 429–437. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Find this resource:

Manzini, Rita M., and Kenneth Wexler (1987). ‘Parameters, binding theory, and learnability,’ Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 18, pp. 413–444.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (1991). ‘Case and licensing,’ in G. F. Westphal, B. Ao and H.-R. Chae (eds.), ESCOL ‘91: Proceedings of the Eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, pp. 234–253. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Department of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (1995). ‘”Cat” as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in Distributed Morphology,’ manuscript, MIT.Find this resource:

Marantz, Alec (1997). ‘No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own Lexicon,’ in A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark, and A. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2, pp. 201–225. University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

Marcus, Gary F. (1993). ‘Negative evidence in language acquisition,’ Cognition, vol. 46, pp. 53–85.Find this resource:

Marcus, Gary F., Charles Vijayan Rao, S. Bandi, and P. Vishton (1999). ‘Rule learning by seven-month-old infants,’ Science, vol. 283, pp. 77–80. (p. 596) Find this resource:

Marcus, Ruth Barcan (1972). ‘Quantification and ontology,’ Noûs, vol. VI, pp. 240–250.Find this resource:

Marcus, Ruth Barcan (1993). Modalities: Philosophical essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Marler, Peter (1977). ‘The structure of animal communication sounds,’ in T. H. Bullock (ed.), Recognition of complex acoustic signals, pp. 17–35. Berlin: Dahlem Konferenzen.Find this resource:

Martín, T. (2012). ‘Deconstructing Catalan object clitics,’ Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Find this resource:

Martin, T., and Wolfram Hinzen (2014). ‘The grammar of the essential indexical,’ Lingua, vol. 148, pp. 95–117.Find this resource:

Martinet, André (1962). A functional view of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Martohardjono, Gita (1993). ‘Wh-movement in the Acquisition of a Second Language: A cross-linguistic study of three languages with and without overt movement,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Find this resource:

Massam, Diane (2001a). ‘Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 19, pp. 153–197.Find this resource:

Massam, Diane (2001b). ‘On predication and the status of subjects in Niuean,’ in W. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, pp. 225–246. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Massam, Diane (2005).‘Lexical categories, lack of inflection, and predicate fronting in Niuean,’ in Andrew Carnie, Sheila Dooley, and Heidi Harley (eds.), Verb first: On the syntax of verb-initial languages, pp. 227–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Mathieu, Eric (2009). ‘From local blocking to Cyclic Agree: The role and meaning of determiners in the history of French,’ in Jila Ghomeshi, Ileana Paul, and Martina Wiltschko (eds.), Determiners: Universals and variation, pp. 123–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Mathur, G., and C. Rathmann (2012). ‘Verb agreement,’ in R. Pfau, M. Steinbach and B. Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (HSK - Handbooks of linguistics and communication science), pp. 136–157. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Matilal, B. K. (1990). The word and the world: India’s contribution to the study of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Matthei, Edward H. (1982). ‘The acquisition of prenominal modifier sequences,’ Cognition, vol. 2, pp. 301–332.Find this resource:

Matthews, Peter H. (1993). Grammatical theory in the United States: From Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Matthewson, Lisa (2007). ‘Review of Restriction and Saturation by Sandra Chung and William A. Ladusaw,’ Language, vol. 83, pp. 425–429.Find this resource:

Mattos, O., and Wolfram Hinzen (2015). ‘The linguistic roots of natural pedagogy,’ manuscript, Universitat de Barcelona.Find this resource:

May, Robert (1985). Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Mayberry, Rachel (1993). ‘First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language,’ Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, vol. 36, pp. 1258–1270.Find this resource:

Mayberry, R. I., and P. Witcher (2005). ‘What age of acquisition effects reveal about the nature of phonological processing,’ Center for Research on Language Technical Report, vol. 17, p. 3.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John (1988). ‘Feature geometry and dependency: A review,’ Phonetica, vol. 45, pp. 84–108.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John (2002). A thematic guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge. University Press.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John (2008). Doing Optimality Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. (p. 597) Find this resource:

McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince (1993). ‘Generalized Alignment,’ Yearbook of Morphology, pp. 79–153.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince (1994). ‘The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology,’ in Mercè Gonzàlez (ed.), Proceedings of 25th Meeting of the Northeastern Linguistics Society, pp. 333–379. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Find this resource:

McCawley, James D. (1976). Notes from the linguistic underground: Syntax and semantics, Volume 7. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

McCloskey, James (1996). ‘The scope of verb-movement in Irish,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 14, pp. 47–104.Find this resource:

McCloskey, James, and Kenneth Hale (1984). ‘On the syntax of person–number inflection in Modern Irish,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 1, pp. 487–553.Find this resource:

McDaniel, Dana (1989). ‘Partial and multiple Wh-movement,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 7, pp. 565–604.Find this resource:

McFadden, T. (2004). ‘The position of morphological case in the derivation: A study on the syntax–morphology interface,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Find this resource:

McGilvray, James (2009). ‘Introduction to third edition,’ in Noam Chomsky (1966/2009) Cartesian Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–52.Find this resource:

McGinn, Colin (1991). The problem of consciousness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Find this resource:

McGinn, Colin (1993). Problems in philosophy: The limits of inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

McGinn, Colin (1994). ‘The problem of philosophy,’ Philosophical Studies, vol. 76, pp. 169–174.Find this resource:

McNeill, David (1966). ‘Developmental psycholinguistics,’ in F. Smith and George A. Miller (eds.), The genesis of language: A Psycholinguistic approach, pp. 35–51. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

McWhorter, John H. (1998). ‘Identifying the Creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class,’ Language, vol. 74, pp. 788–818.Find this resource:

McWhorter, John H. (2001). ‘The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars,’ Linguistic Typology, vol. 5, pp. 125–166.Find this resource:

McWhorter, John H. (2011). Linguistic simplicity and complexity: Why do languages undress? Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Medeiros, David (2008). ‘Optimal growth in phrase structure,’ Biolinguistics, vol. 2, pp. 152–195.Find this resource:

Medeiros, David (2012). ‘Economy of command,’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.Find this resource:

Mehler, Jacques, E. Dupoux, T. Nazzi, and G. Dehaene-Lambertz (1996). ‘Coping with linguistic diversity: The infant’s viewpoint,’ in J. L. Morgan and K. D. Demuth (eds.), From signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, pp. 101–116. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Mei, Kuang (2003). ‘Yingjie yige kaozhengxue he yuyanxue jiehe de hanyuyufashi yanjiu de xin jumian [Anticipating a new horizon of the historical syntax of Chinese incorporating philology and linguistics],’ in Dah-An Ho (ed.), Gujin Tongsai: Hanyu de lishi yu fazhan (Historical Development of Chinese Language), pp. 23–47. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Find this resource:

Mei, Tsu-lin (1989). ‘The causative and denominative functions of the *s- prefix in Old Chinese,’ in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sinology, pp. 33–51. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Find this resource:

Mei, Tsu-lin (2012). ‘The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan,’ Language and Linguistics, vol. 13, pp. 1–28.Find this resource:

Meier, R. (1990) ‘Person deixis in ASL,’ in S. Fischer and P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, vol. 1: Linguistics, pp. 175–190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (p. 598) Find this resource:

Meillet, Antoine (1904–1905). ‘Comment les mots changent de sens,’ L’année sociologique, vol. 9, pp. 1–38.Find this resource:

Meillet, Antoine (1951). Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, Volume II. Paris: Klincksieck.Find this resource:

Meillet, Antoine (1958). Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, Volume I. Paris: Honoré Champion.Find this resource:

Meillet, Antoine, and J. Vendryes (1968). Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques, 4th edition. Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion.Find this resource:

Meixner, U. (2004). The two sides of being. Paderborn: Mentis.Find this resource:

Melchert, Craig (1994). Anatolian historical phonology. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Find this resource:

Mendez, M. F., D. G. Clark, J. S. Shapira, and J. L. Cummings (2003). ‘Speech and language in progressive nonfluent aphasia compared with early Alzheimer’s disease,’ Neurology, vol. 61, pp. 1108–1113.Find this resource:

Merchant, Jason (2001). The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Merker, Björn (2000). ‘Synchronous chorussing & human origins,’ in Nils Wallin, Björn Merker, and Steven Brown (eds.), The origin of music, pp. 315–328. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Mesgarani, Nima, Stephen V. David, Jonathan B. Fritz, and Shihab A. Shamma (2008). ‘Phoneme representation & classification in primary auditory cortex,’ Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 123, pp. 899–909.Find this resource:

Mielke, Jeff (2004). ‘The emergence of distinctive features,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.Find this resource:

Miestamo, Matti (2005). Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource: