Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 28 February 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article notes that stone artefacts often provide the only means for identifying sites, reconstructing behaviour and determining cultural affiliation in West and Central Africa. For the period covering the end of the Pleistocene and early Holocene, lithic industries can be grouped into two broad technological traditions, the Lupemban–Tshitolian assemblages and microlithic quartz industries. Even if different human populations would leave different signatures in their material culture and, more specifically, their stone tools, the current distribution of western and eastern hunter-gatherers in the Central African forest is not reflected in the Pleistocene or Holocene distribution of the two broad technological complexes. Meanwhile, a combination of poor access to and conservation of raw material may explain the absence of evidence in the forests of the central Congo basin.

Keywords: West Africa, Central Africa, stone artefacts, lithic industries, Lupemban–Tshitolian assemblages, microlithic quartz industries, central Congo basin

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.