Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 15 November 2019

Abstract and Keywords

Three major moral positions recur, resting on far-reaching disagreements over the consequences of renouncing war. The mix and relative intensity of such convictions among populations is a major determinant of national strategic culture (NSC), ‘a distinctive body of beliefs, attitudes and practices regarding the use of force’ arising from historical experience and geopolitical setting, and imposing boundaries (though often imprecise or long term—and more flexible over covert operations) to the moral decisions that a nation can tolerate in conflict. NSCs condition national appetites for strategic risk, and capacities to deter, reassure, or intervene. They can change profoundly if different moral positions gain electoral importance, straining alliances when change occurs unevenly between members.

Keywords: morality, war, national strategic culture, moral decision, strategic risk, electoral importance

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.