Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 26 February 2020

Abstract and Keywords

Russia's military history has been marked by an aptitude to ‘produce’ able officers, who ensured Russia's response to foreign attacks while helping the country to extend its geographical reach. Also striking is the continuous interest of Russian military theoreticians in the contributions of foreign military thinkers to the art of warfare and military theory. However, in the post-Cold War years, Russia seems not to have retained much that is positive of its legacy of militarism. Its beleaguered military performed poorly in Afghanistan, Chechnya, and, though to a lesser extent, in Georgia. In all these circumstances, the Russian military appeared unable to act adequately, not only because of the acute moral and material crisis it was living through but also out of what appeared to be operational and conceptual inertia, if not disarray.

Keywords: military history, Russia, foreign attacks, striking, art of warfare, military theory

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.