Abstract and Keywords
This article evaluates the status of historical approaches to the study of Congress. It focuses on the intersection of Congress and American Political Development (APD). It particularly traces missed changes, how the advantageous substantive and methodological conditions created in the past decade might be captured and seized to achieve the goal John Lapinski and the author of this chapter have set half a decade ago: to make the “study of Congress as an institution and as a site for discussion, behavior, and choice on public policy a more constitutive part of ADP”. Both the author and John Lapinski argued that the secondary place of Congress within ADP has proved to be paradoxical and expensive: paradoxical because political representation as a concept and as an institutional practice offers a rich site to investigate the temporality and the qualities of political liberalism in America; and expensive because Congress has always been a constitutive part of the American state specifically in its role in the policy process. Building a closer relationship between congressional studies and ADP is significant for without the thematic integration ADP offers, historical studies of Congress run the risk of being insufficiently focused and scattered, hence losing a coherent vantage point from which to understand the trajectories of American politics.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.