Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 05 June 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article discusses head dependencies. It begins by recapitulating the essentials of the analysis of head movement as it was largely agreed on in mainstream syntactic theory by the late 1980s. This approach was in essence unaltered in the earlier versions of minimalism. Section 9.3 considers the reasons that led Chomsky to suggest excluding head movement from the core operations of the narrow syntax. Section 9.4 reviews the various alternatives to the earlier conception of narrow-syntactic head movement that have been put forward: phonetic form movement, remnant phrasal-category movement, and ‘reprojective movement’, focusing on a case study of each alternative. Finally, Section 9.5 considers the conceptual status of head movement in relation to the general goals of the minimalist program.

Keywords: head dependencies, syntactic theory, minimalism, Chomsky, narrow syntax, phonetic form movement, phrasal-category movement, reprojective movement

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.