Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 19 September 2019

(p. 673) References

(p. 673) References

Abaelardus, P. 1970. Dialectica, ed. L. De Rijk, Assen: Van Gorcum.Find this resource:

Abeles, M. 1982. Local Cortical Circuits: An Electrophysiological Study, Springer, Berlin.Find this resource:

Abeles, M., G. Hayon,and D. Lehman. 2004. Modeling compositionality by dynamic binding of synfire chains, Journal of Computational Neuroscience 17, 179–201.Find this resource:

Adams, E. W. 1975. The Logic of Conditionals, Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Aissen, J. 2003. Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–83.Find this resource:

Ammonius 1897. In Aristotelis De Interpretatione Commentarius, ed. A. Busse, Berlin: Reimer.Find this resource:

Andersen, H. 1973. Abductive and deductive change, Language 40: 765–93.Find this resource:

Angelelli, I. (ed.) 1967. Gottlob Frege. Kleine Schriften, Hildesheim: Olms.Find this resource:

Apresjan, J. D. 1973. Synonymy and synonyms, in F. Kiefer (ed.), Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, Dordrecht: Reidel, 173–99.Find this resource:

Arad, M. 2005. Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax, New York: Springer.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. 1981. Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In V. B. Brooks (ed.), Handbook of Physiology—The Nervous System II. Motor Control, American Physiological Society, 1449–80.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. 2005a. From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics (with commentaries and authors response), Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 105–67.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. 2005b. Interweaving protosign and protospeech: Further developments beyond the mirror, Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 6: 145–71.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. 2008. Holophrasis and the protolanguage spectrum, Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 9 (1): 151–65.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. 2012. How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. and D. Bickerton (eds). 2010. The Emergence of Protolanguage: Holophrasis vs compositionality. Philadelphia, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. and D. Caplan. 1979. Neurolinguistics must be computational. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2: 449–83.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. and J. C. Hill. 1988. Language acquisition: Schemas replace universal grammar. In J. A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining Language Universals, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 56–72.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. and J.-S. Liaw. 1995. Sensorimotor transformations in the worlds of frogs and robots, Artificial Intelligence 72: 53–79.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A. and M. B. Hesse. 1986. The Construction of Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A., K. Liebal, and S. Pika. 2008. Primate vocalization, ape gesture, and human language: An evolutionary framework, Current Anthropology 49 (6).Find this resource:

Arbib, M. A., P. Érdi, and J. Szentágothai. 1998. Neural Organization: Structure, Function, and Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (p. 674) Find this resource:

Armstrong, S. L., L. R. Gleitman, and H. Gleitman. 1983. What some concepts might not be, Cognition 13, 263–308.Find this resource:

Arnold, K. and K. Zuberbühler. 2006. Semantic combinations in primate calls, Nature 441(18): 303.Find this resource:

Aron, A. and L. Westbay. 1996. Dimensions of the prototype of love, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 535–51.Find this resource:

Ashby, W. R. 1961. An Introduction to Cybernetics, London: Chapman& Hall.Find this resource:

Asher, N. and A. Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Atkins, B. T., J. Kegl, and B. Levin. 1988. Anatomy of a Verb Entry: From Linguistic Theory to Lexicographic Practice, International Journal of Lexicography 1: 84–126.Find this resource:

Austin, J. L. 1961. Truth. In J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warncock (eds), Philosophical Papers, oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baader, F. and T. Nipkow. 1998. Term Rewriting and All That, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baccalá, L. and K. Sameshima. 2001. Overcoming the limitations of correlation analysis for many simultaneously processed neural structures, Progress in Brain Research 130, 33–47.Find this resource:

Bach, E. 1968. Nouns and noun phrases, in E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds), Universals of Linguistic Theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 91–24.Find this resource:

Bach, E. 1979. Control in Montague Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry 10: 515–31.Find this resource:

Bach, E. 1980. In defense of passive, Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 297–341.Find this resource:

Bach, E. and D. Wheeler. 1983. Montague phonology: a first approximation. In W. Chao and D. Wheeler (eds), Problems of Linguistic Metatheory, no. 7 in University of Massachussetts Occasional Papers.Find this resource:

Bach, K. 1982. Semantic non-specificity and mixed quantifiers, Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 593–605.Find this resource:

Baggio, G., T. Choma, M. van Lambalgen, and P. Hagoort. 2010. Coercion and compositionality, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22, 2131–2140.Find this resource:

Baggio, G., and M. van Lambalgen. 2007. The processing consequences of the imperfective paradox, Journal of Semantics 24, 307–30.Find this resource:

Baggio, G., M. van Lambalgen, and P. Hagoort. 2008. Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study, Journal of Memory and Language 59, 36–53.Find this resource:

Baggio, G., M. van Lambalgen, and P. Hagoort 2012. Language, linguistics and cognition. In M. Stokhof and J. Groenendijk (eds), Handbook of Philosophy of Linguistics, Amsterdam-New York: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Baker, G. and P. Hacker 1980. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, G. and P. Hacker 1984. Language, Sense and Nonsense, Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation, Chicago: University of Chicago.Find this resource:

Baker, M. 1997. Thematic roles and grammatical categories. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 73–137.Find this resource:

Baker, M. 2001. The Atoms of Language: The Minds Hidden Rules of Grammar, New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Baker, M. 2003. Lexical Categories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Baker, M., K. Johnson, and I. Roberts 1989. Passives raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–51.Find this resource:

Baldwin, J. M. 1896. A new factor in evolution, American Naturalist 30: 441–51.Find this resource:

Balota, D. A. 1994. Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, San Diego: Academic Press, 303–58. (p. 675) Find this resource:

Bar-Hillel, Y. 1964. A demonstration of the nonfeasibility of fully automatic high quality translation, in Y. Bar-Hillel, Language and Information: Selected Essays on their Theory and Application, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 174–9.Find this resource:

Barsalou, L. W. 1987. The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Barsalou, L. W. 1992. Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields, in A. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay (eds), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 21–74.Find this resource:

Barsalou, L. W. 1993. Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. C.Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway and P. E. M. Morris (eds), Theories of memory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Find this resource:

Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577–660.Find this resource:

Barsalou, L. W. and C. R. Hale. 1993. Components of conceptual representation: from feature lists to recursive frames, in I. van Mechelen, J. A. Hampton, R. S. Michalski, and P. Theuns (eds), Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis, London: Academic Press, 97–144.Find this resource:

Barsalou, L. W. and J. J. Prinz. 1997. Mundane creativity in perceptual symbol systems. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, and J. Vaid (eds), Creative Thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 267–307.Find this resource:

Barss, A. and H. Lasnik. 1986. A note on anaphora and double objects, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–54.Find this resource:

Barton, S. and A. Sanford. 1993. A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment, Memory and Cognition 21, 477–87.Find this resource:

Barwise, J. 1987. Noun phrases, generalized quantiers and anaphora. In P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantiers, Studies in Language and Philosophy, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1–30.Find this resource:

Barwise, J. and J. Etchemendy. 1987. The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity, New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Barwise, J. and J. Perry. 1983. Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Barwise, J. and R. Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language, Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219.Find this resource:

Bastiaansen, M., M. van der Linden, M. Ter Keurs, T. Dijkstra, and P. Hagoort. 2005. Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17, 530–41.Find this resource:

Batali, J. 2002. The negotiation and acquisition of recursive grammars as a result of competition among exemplars. In E. Briscoe (ed.), Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–72.Find this resource:

Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney. 1982. Functionalist approaches to grammar, in E. Wanner, and L. R. Gleitman (eds), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 173–218.Find this resource:

Beaver, D. and B. Clark. 2003. Always and only. Why not all focus sensitive operators are alike, Natural Language Semantics 11(4): 323–62.Find this resource:

Beaver, D. 1997. Presupposition. In J. van Benthem and A. (eds), Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 939–1008.Find this resource:

Beck, S. and K. Johnson. 2004. Double objects again, Linguistic Inquiry 35(1): 97–123. (p. 676) Find this resource:

Belvin, R. S. 1996. Inside Events: The Non-Possessive Meanings of Possession Predicates and the Semantic Conceptualization of Events. Doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Find this resource:

Bendor, D. and X. Wang. 2005. The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex, Nature 4367054: 1161–5.xFind this resource:

Beqa, A., S. Kirby, and J. R. Hurford. 2008. Regular morphology as a cultural adaptation: Nonuniform frequency in an experimental iterated learning model. In A. D. M. Smith, K. Smith, and R. Ferrer i Cancho (eds), The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, Singapore: World Scientific, 401–2.Find this resource:

Berg, G. 1992. A connectionist parser with recursive sentence structure and lexical disambiguation, AAAI-92: Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Berlin, B. and P. Kay. 1969. Basic Colour Terms: Their Universality and Evolution, Berkeley/CA: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Bickerton, D. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–221.Find this resource:

Bickerton, D. 1995. Language and Human Behavior, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Find this resource:

Bickerton, D. 2003. Symbol and structure: A comprehensive framework for language evolution. In M. H. Christiansen and S. Kirby (eds), Language Evolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 77–93.Find this resource:

Bickerton, D. 2005. Beyond the mirror neuron—the smoke neuron? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2): 126.Find this resource:

Biederman, I. 1987. Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding, Psychological Review 94: 115–47.Find this resource:

Bienenstock, E. 1995. A model of neocortex, Network: Computation in neural systems 6: 179–224.Find this resource:

Bierwisch, M. 1983. Semantische und konzeptuelle Repräsentationen lexikalischer Einheiten. In R. Ruzicka and W. Motsch (eds), Untersuchungen zur Semantik, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 61–99.Find this resource:

Bierwisch, M. 1989. The semantics of gradation, in M. Bierwisch and E. Lang (eds), Dimensional Adjectives. Grammatical structure and conceptual interpretation. Berlin: Springer, 71–262.Find this resource:

Bierwisch, M. 1997. Lexical information from a minimalist point of view. In C. Wilder, H.-M. Gärtner, and M. Bierwisch (eds), The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 227–66.Find this resource:

Bierwisch, M. 2002. A case for cause. In I. Kaufmann and B. Stiebels (eds), More than Words, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 327–53.Find this resource:

Bierwisch, M. and E. Lang (eds). 1989. Dimensional Adjectives. Grammatical structure and conceptual interpretation. Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

Bigelow, J. and R. Pargetter. 1987. Function, Journal of Philosophy 84 (4): 181–96.Find this resource:

Billings, R. S. and S. A. Marcus. 1983. Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models of decision behavior: Process tracing versus policy capturing, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31: 331–52.Find this resource:

Bird, H., M. A. Lambon Ralph, M. Seidenberg, J. L. McClelland, and K. Patterson. 2003. Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What’s the connection? Journal of Memory and Language 48: 502–26.Find this resource:

Bloom, P. 2000. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (p. 677) Find this resource:

Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language, London: George Allen & Unwin.Find this resource:

Bolinger, D. 1972. Degree Words. Den Haag: Mouton.Find this resource:

Bonnay, D. 2005. Compositionality and molecularism. In M. Werning, E. Machery, and G. Schurz (eds), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content. Vol. I. Frankfurt: OntosVerlag, 41–62.Find this resource:

Boodin, J. 1939. The Social Mind: Foundations of Social Philosophy, New York: Macmillan Co.Find this resource:

Boolos, G. 1998. Logic, Logic, and Logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Boolos, G. S., R. C. Jeffrey, and J. P. Burgess. 2002. Computability and Logic 4th edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Borer, H. 2005. Structuring Sense (volumes I and II), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Borg, E. 2004. Minimal Semantics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Borschev, V. and B. H. Partee. 2001. Genitive modifiers, sorts, and metonymy, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 242: 140–60.Find this resource:

Bouillon, P. and F. Busa (eds). 2001. The Language of Word Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Boyd, R. and P. J. Richerson, P. J. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Brachman, R. J. 1978. A structural paradigm for representing knowledge, in BBN Report No. 3605, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Brennan, J. and L. Pylkkänen 2008. Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion, Brain and Language 106: 132–43.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. and T. Nikitina. 2007. The gradience of the dative alternation. In L. Uyechi and L. Hee Wee (eds), Reality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Bridgeman, B. 2005. Action planning supplements mirror systems in language evolution, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 129–30.Find this resource:

Brighton, H. 2002. Compositional syntax from cultural transmission, Artificial Life 8: 25–54.Find this resource:

Brighton, H. 2003. Simplicity as a driving force in linguistic evolution, PhD Thesis, The University of Edinburgh.Find this resource:

Brighton, H., K. Smith, and S. Kirby. 2005b. Language as an evolutionary system, Physics of Life Reviews 2: 177–226.Find this resource:

Brighton, H., S. Kirby, and K. Smith. 2005a. Cultural selection for learnability: Three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable. In M. Tallerman (ed.), Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 291–309.Find this resource:

Briscoe, E. (ed.) 2002. Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Brogaard, B. 2009. Introduction to Relative Truth, Synthese, 166(2): 215–29 (online 2007).Find this resource:

Brooks, L. R. 1978. Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Find this resource:

Brown, C. and P. Hagoort. 1993. The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5, 34–44.Find this resource:

Buchanan, R. and G. Ostretag (2005) Has the problem of incompleteness rested on a mistake? Mind 114: 889–913.Find this resource:

Bullinaria, J. and J. Levy. 2007. Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: a computational study, Behavior Research Methods 39: 510–26.Find this resource:

Burge, T. 1973. Reference and proper names, Journal of Philosophy 70: 425–39. (p. 678) Find this resource:

Burris, S. and H. P. Sankappanavar. 1981. A Course in Universal Algebra, no. 78 in Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

Butt, M. 1997. Complex predicates in Urdu. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, and P. Sells (eds), Complex Predicates, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 107–49.Find this resource:

Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form, vol.9 of Studies in Language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, J. L. 1995. Regular mophology and the lexicon, Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 425–55.Find this resource:

Bynum, T. W. (ed.) 1972. Gottlob Frege. Conceptual notation and related articles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Caicedo, X., F. Dechesne, and T. M. V. Janssen. 2009. Equivalence and quantifier rules for logics with imperfect information, Logic Journal of the IGPL 17: 91–129.Find this resource:

Calcagno, M. 1995. A sign-based extension to the Lambek Calculus for discontinuous constituents. Bulletin of the IGPL 3: 555–78.Find this resource:

Cameron, P. J. and W. Hodges. 2001. Some combinatorics of imperfect information, Journal of Symbolic Logic 66: 673–84.Find this resource:

Cangelosi, A., A. D. M. Smith, and K. Smith. (eds) 2006. The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, Singapore: World Scientific.Find this resource:

Capirci, O. and Volterra, V. 2008. Gesture and speech. The emergence and development of a strong and changing partnership, Gesture 8 (1): 22–44.Find this resource:

Cappelen, H. 2008. The creative interpreter: content relativism and assertion, Philosophical Perspectives, 22: 23–46.Find this resource:

Cappelen, H. and J. Hawthorne. 2009. Relativism and Monadic Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cappelen, H. and E. Lepore. 2004. Insensitive Semantics, Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Caramazza, A. 1984. The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification in aphasia, Brain and Language 21: 9–20.Find this resource:

Carey, S. 1985. Conceptual Change in Childhood, Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Carey, S. 1988. Conceptual differences between children and adults, Mind and Language 3: 167–81.Find this resource:

Carlson, G. 1984. Thematic roles and their role in semantic interpretation, Linguistics 22: 259–79.Find this resource:

Carnap, R. 1947. Meaning and Necessity: a study in semantics and modal logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Carpenter, B. 1992. The Logic of Typed Feature Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Carrier, J. and J. H. Randall. 1992. The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173–234.Find this resource:

Carruthers, P. 2002. The cognitive functions of language, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 6.Find this resource:

Casati, R. and A. Varzi. 1994. Holes and Other Superficialities, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Castañeda, H. 1967. Comments. In N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Castelo-Branco, M., R. Goebel, S. Neuenschwander, and W. Singer. 2000. Neural synchrony correlates with surface segregation rules, Nature 4058: 685–91.Find this resource:

Chater, N. and C. D. Manning. 2006. Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition, TRENDS in Cognitive Science 10: 335–44.Find this resource:

Chater, N. and M. Oaksford. 1999. Ten Years of the rational analysis of cognition, Trends in Cognitive Science 3: 57–65. (p. 679) Find this resource:

Chauncey, K., A. Ozyürek, P. Hagoort, and S. Kita. 2004. Recognition of iconic gestures: A first gating study. Unpublished manuscript.Find this resource:

Cheney, D. L. and R. M. Seyfarth. 1990. How Monkeys See the World: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Find this resource:

Cheney, D. L. and R. M. Seyfarth. 2005. Constraints and preadaptations in the earliest stages of language evolution, The Linguistic Review 22: 135–59.Find this resource:

Chierchia, G. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity pphenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface, in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39–103.Find this resource:

Chierchia, G. and S. McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chiswell, I. and W. Hodges. 2007. Mathematical Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures, ‘S-Gravenhage: Mouton.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1959. A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior, Language 35: 26–58.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs and R. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Waltham: Ginn.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1975a. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, New York:Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1975b. Reflections on Language, New York, NY: Pantheon.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar, Linguistic Analysis 2: 303–51.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and representations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 1–14.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language, New York: Praeger.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1987. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 2002. On Nature and Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 2005. Three factors in language design, Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. 2008. On Phases. In C. Otero et al. (eds), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English, New York: Harper and Row.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. and H. Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. v. Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann, (eds), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, De Gruyter, 506–56. (Reprinted in N. Chomsky, The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.)Find this resource:

Christianson, K. A. Hollingworth, J. Halliwell, and F. Ferreira. 2001. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger, Cognitive Psychology 42: 368–407.Find this resource:

Church, A. 1941. The Calculus of Lambda Conversion, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Churchland, P. M. 1984. Matter and Consciousness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Churchland, P. S. 1986. Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Clahsen, H. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 991–1060.Find this resource:

Clahsen, H. and M. Almazan. 1998. Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome, Cognition 68: 167–98. (p. 680) Find this resource:

Clahsen, H. and M. Rothweiler. 1993. Inflectional rules in children’s grammars: Evidence from the development of participles in German, Yearbook of Morphology 1992: 1–34.Find this resource:

Clahsen, H., S. Eisenbeiss, and I. Sonnenstuhl. 1997. Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words, Theoretical Linguistics 23: 201–49.Find this resource:

Clark, E. 1988. On the logic of contrast, Journal of Child Language 15: 317–35.Find this resource:

Clark, H. 1975. Bridging. In R. Schank and B. Nash-Webber (eds), Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Clark, H. H. 1996. Using Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Cohen, B. and G. L. Murphy. 1984. Models of concepts, Cognitive Science 8: 27–58.Find this resource:

Cohen, L. J. 1986. How is conceptual innovation possible? Erkenntnis 25: 221–38.Find this resource:

Collins, P. 1995. The indirect object constructions in English: an informational approach, Linguistics 33: 35–49.Find this resource:

Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Conklin, J. and C. Eliasmith. 2005. An attractor network model of path integration in the rat. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 18: 183–203.Find this resource:

Connolly, A. C., J. Fodor, L. Gleitman, and H. Gleitman. 2007. Why Stereotypes Don’t Even Make Good Defaults, Cognition 103(1); 1–22.Find this resource:

Cooper, L. A. 1975. Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes, Cognitive Psychology, 7: 20–43.Find this resource:

Cooper, R. 1975. Montague’s Semantic Theory and Transformational Syntax. PhD thesis, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Cooper, R. 2005. Austinian truth, attitudes and type theory, Research on Language and Computation 3(4): 333–62.Find this resource:

Copestake, A. 1992. The Representation of Lexical Semantic Information, CSRP 280, University of Sussex.Find this resource:

Copestake, A. 1993. Defaults in the LKB. In T. Briscoe and A. Copestake (eds), Default Inheritance in the Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Copestake, A. and E. Briscoe. 1992. Lexical operations in a unification-based framework. In J. Pustejovsky and S. Bergler (eds), Lexical Semantics and Knowledge Representation, New York: Springer Verlag.Find this resource:

Copestake, A. and T. Briscoe. 1995. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension, Journal of Semantics, 15–67.Find this resource:

Cormack, A. 1984. VP anaphora: variables and scope, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds), Varieties of Formal Sematnics, Dordrecht: Reidel, 81–102.Find this resource:

Costello, F. J. and M. T. Keane. 2001a. Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination, Cognitive Science 24: 299–349.Find this resource:

Costello, F. J. and M. T. Keane. 2001b. Testing two theories of conceptual combination: Alignment versus diagnosticity in the comprehension and production of combined concepts, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27: 255–71.Find this resource:

Costello, F. J. and M. T. Keane. 2005. Compositionality and the pragmatics of conceptual combination, in E. Machery, M. Werning, and G. Schultz (eds), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content, II: Applications to Linguistics, Psychology and Neuroscience. Frankfort: Ontos, 203–16.Find this resource:

Couturat, L. 1903. Opuscules et Fragments Inédits de Leibniz, Paris: Alcan. (p. 681) Find this resource:

Covington, M. 2009. Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic Models of Sentence Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Crain, S. and P. Pietroski. 2001. Nature, nurture, and universal grammar, Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 139–86.Find this resource:

Cree, G. S. and K. McRae. 2003. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello and many other such concrete nouns, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132: 163–201.Find this resource:

Cresswell, M. J. 1973. Logics and Languages, London: Methuen.Find this resource:

Croft, W. 1998. The structure of events and the structure of language. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 67–92.Find this resource:

Croft, W. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach, Harlow, UK: Longman.Find this resource:

Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, W. and D. A. Cruse. 2005. Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Crystal, D. 2003. Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.Find this resource:

Culicover, P. and R. Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Culicover, P. and R. Jackendoff. 2006. The simpler syntax hypothesis, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 109: 413–18.Find this resource:

Currie, G. 1982. Frege: An introduction to his philosophy, nr. 11 in Harvester studies in philosophy, Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. 1965. Theories of meaning and learnable languages, in Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Proceedings of the 1964 Internatonal Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Tel-Aviv), North Holland, 383–94. Reprinted in Davidson 2001, 3–15.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. 1967a. The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, 81–95.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. 1967b. Truth and meaning, Synthese 17: 304–23. Reprinted in Davidson 2001, 17–36.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. 1968. On saying That, Synthese 19, 130–46. Reprinted in Davidson 2001, 93–108.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. 1973. In defense of convention T, in H. Leblanc (ed.), Truth, Syntax and Modality, Amsterdam: North Holland, 76–85. Reprinted in Davidson 2001, 65–75.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. 1985. Adverbs of action. In B. Vermazen, and M. Hintikka (eds), Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Davidson, D. 2001. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Davis, W. 2003. Meaning, Expression, and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dawkins, R. 1989. The Selfish Gene 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

de Beule, J. and B. K. Bergen. 2006. On the emergence of compositionality, In A. Cangelosi, A. D. M. Smith, and K. Smith (eds), The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, Singapore: World Scientific, 35–42.Find this resource:

de Diego Balaguer, R., A. Costa, N. Sebastián-Galles, M. Juncadella, and A. Caramazza. 2004. Regular and irregular morphology and its relationship with agrammatism: evidence from two Spanish–Catalan bilinguals, Brain and Language 91: 212–22. (p. 682) Find this resource:

de Groote, P. 2001. Towards abstract Categorial Grammars. In Association for Computational Linguistics, 39th Annual Meeting and 10th Conference of the European Chapter, Toulouse, 148–55.Find this resource:

de Roever, W.-P., F. de Beer, U. Hanneman, J. Hooman, Y. Lakhnech, M. Poel, and J. Zwiers. 2001. Concurrency verification. An introduction to compositional and non compositional methods, nr. 54 in W.-P. de Roever, F. de Boer, U. Hanneman, J. Hooman, Y. Lakhnech, M. Poel, and J. Zwiers (eds), Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

de Roever, W.-P., Langmaack, H. and Pnueli, A. (eds). 1998. Compositionality: the significant difference, nr. 1536 in ‘Lecture notes in computer science’, COMPOS ‘97, Bad Malente, Germany, Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

de Waal, F. B. M. 2006. Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved (with further contributions by Robert Wright, Christine M. Korsgaard, Philip Kitcher, and Peter Singer; Edited and introduced by Stephen Macedo and Josiah Ober), Princeton: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Deacon, T. 1997. The Symbolic Species, London: Penguin.Find this resource:

Dediu, D. and D. R. Ladd. 2007. Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, aspm and microcephalin, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 10944–9.Find this resource:

Den Dikken, M., R. K. Larson, and P. Ludlow. 1997. Intensional ‘transitive’ verbs and concealed complement clauses, Rivista di Linguistica 8: 29–46.Find this resource:

Dennis, I., J. A. Hampton, and S. E. G. Lea. 1973. New problem in concept formation, Nature 243: 101–2.Find this resource:

Dever, J. 1999. Compositionality as methodology, Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 311–26.Find this resource:

Dever, J. 2006. Compositionality. In E. Lepore and B. Smith (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

DiCarlo, J. J. and K. O. Johnson. 2000. Spatial and temporal structure of receptive fields in primate somatosensory area 3b: effects of stimulus scanning direction and orientation, Journal of Neuroscience 201: 495–510.Find this resource:

Diesmann, M., M.-O. Gewaltig, and A. Aertsen. 1999. Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks, Nature 402: 529–33.Find this resource:

Dijkstra, E. W. 1969. EWD 264, Unpublished note, available at http://www.cs.utexas.edu/ EWD/, last acccessed 13 June 2011.

Dölling, J. 1992. Flexible Interpretationen durch Sortenverschiebung. In I. Zimmermann and A. Strigen (eds), Fügungspotenzen, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Find this resource:

Downing, P. 1977. On the creation and use of English compound nouns, Language 53: 810–42.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. 1982. Grammatical relations in Montague Grammar, in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds), The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 79–130.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. R. 1986. The effects of aspectual class on the the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics, Linguistics and Philosophy 9(1).Find this resource:

Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection, Language 67: 547–619.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. 2007. Compositionality as an empirical problem, in C. Barker and P. Jacobson (eds), Direct Compositionality, nr. 14 in Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–101.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. R., R. E. Wall, and S. Peters. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics, no. 11 in Synthese Library. Dordrecht: Reidel. (p. 683) Find this resource:

Dray, W. 1957. Laws and Explanation in History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Duhem, P. 1906. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1954 translation of La théorie physique, son objet et sa structure, by P. Wiener.Find this resource:

Dummett, M. 1973. Frege. Philosophy of language, London: Duckworth. Second edition 1981.Find this resource:

Dummett, M. 1981a. Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Dummett, M. 1981b. The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy, London: Duckworth.Find this resource:

Dunbar, R. 1996. Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language, London: Faber and Faber LtdFind this resource:

Eckhorn, R., A. Bruns, M. Saam, A. Gail, A. Gabriel, and H. J. Brinksmeyer. 2001. Flexible cortical gamma-band correlations suggest neural principles of visual processing, Visual Cognition 83–5: 519–30.Find this resource:

Eckhorn, R., T. Schanze, M. Brosch, W. Salem, and R. Bauer. 1991. Stimulus-specific synchronizations in cat visual cortex: Multiple microelectrode and correlation studies from several cortical areas. In E. Basar and T. H. Bullock (eds), Induced Rhythms in the Brain, Berlin: Birkhuser.Find this resource:

Eisenbeiss, S. 2002. Merkmalsgesteuerter Grammatikerwerb: eine Untersuchung zum Erwerb der Struktur und Flexion vonNominalphrasen [Feature-Driven Grammar Acquisition: An Investigation on the Acquisition of NP Structure and Inflection]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Duesseldorf. http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~seisen/my%20dissertation.htm.Find this resource:

Elbourne, P. 2005. Situations and Individuals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Eliasmith, C. 2005. Cognition with neurons: A large-scale, biologically realistic model of the Wason task. In G. Bara, L. Barsalou, and M. Bucciarelli (eds), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy.Find this resource:

Eliasmith, C. in press. How to Build a Brain: A neural architecture for biological cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Eliasmith, C. and C. H. Anderson. 2003. Neural engineering: Computation, representation and dynamics in neurobiological systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Eliasmith, C., M. B. Westover, and C. H. Anderson. 2002. A general framework for neurobiological modeling: An application to the vestibular system, Neurocomputing, 46: 1071–6.Find this resource:

Ellroy, J. 1987. The Black Dahlia, New York: Vintage Books.Find this resource:

Elman, J. 2005. Connectionist models of cognitive development: where next?, TRENDS in Cognitive Science 9: 111–17.Find this resource:

Elman, J., E. Bates, M. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi, and K. Plunkett. 1996. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Embick, D. and A. Marantz. 2005. Cognitive neuroscience and the English past tense: comments on the paper by Ullman et al., Brain and Language 93: 243–7.Find this resource:

Engel, A. K. and W. Singer. 2001. Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 16–25.Find this resource:

Engel, A. K., P. König, A. K. Kreiter, T. B. Schillen, and W. Singer. 1992. Temporal coding in the visual cortex: new vistas on integration in the nervous system, Trends in Neurosciences 15: 218–26.Find this resource:

Engel, A. K., P. Fries, and W. Singer. 2001. Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing, Nature reviews: Neuroscience 2 10: 704–16.Find this resource:

Estes, W. K. 1994. Classification and Cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Estes, Z. and S. Glucksberg. 2000. Interactive property attribution in concept combination, Memory and Cognition 28: 28–34.Find this resource:

Evans, F. 1988. Binding into anaphoric verb phrases, in J. Powers and K. de Jong (eds), Proceedings of ESCOl 5, Columbus: Ohio State University, 122–9. (p. 684) Find this resource:

Evans, G. 1982. Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Evans, G. 1985. Does tense logic rest on a mistake? In Collected Papers, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 343–63.Find this resource:

Evans, J. St. B. T. 1982. The Psychology of Deductive Reasoning, London: Routledge Kegan and Paul.Find this resource:

Evans, J. St. B. T. and D. E. Over. 1996. Rationality and Reasoning, Hove: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

Evans, J. St., J. H. Simon, and D. E. Over. 2003. Conditionals and conditional probability, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition 29/2: 321–35.Find this resource:

Falkenhainer, B., K. D. Forbus, and D. Gentner. 1989. The structure mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence 41: 1–63.Find this resource:

Fanselow, G. 1993. Instead of preface: some reflections on parameters. In G. Fanselow (ed.), The Parametrization of Universal Grammar, Amsterdam: Benjamins, vii–xvii.Find this resource:

Fanselow, G. and S. W. Felix. 1987. Sprachtheorie: Eine Einführung in die Generative Grammatik. Bd. I. [Linguistic Theory: An Introduction into Generative Grammar, Volume I], Tübingen: Francke.Find this resource:

Feferman, S. 1975. A language and axioms for explicit mathematics. In J. N. Crossley (ed.), Algebra and Logic, LNM 450. Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

Felleman, D. J. and D. C. van Essen. 1991. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex, Cerebral Cortex 1: 1–47.Find this resource:

Fernando, T. 2001. Conservative generalized quantiers and presupposition. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XI, Ithaca: Cornell University, 172–91.Find this resource:

Fernando, T. 2005. Compositionality inductively, co-inductively and contextually, in M. Werning et al. (eds), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content, Volume 1: Foundational Issues. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. 87–96.Find this resource:

Fernando, T. and D. Westerståhl. 2001. ESSLLI 2001 lecture notes at www.helsinki.fi/esslli/ courses/CaC.html.

Ferreira, F. and N. Patson. 2007. The good enough approach to language comprehension, Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 71–83.Find this resource:

Ferreira, F., V. Ferraro, and K. Bailey. 2002. Good-enough representations in language comprehension, Current Directions in Psychological Science 11: 11–15.Find this resource:

Ferretti, T., M. Kutas, and K. McRae. 2007. Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 33: 182–96.Find this resource:

Fiengo, R. and R. May. 1994. Indices and Identity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fillmore, C. J., P. Kay, and M. K. O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone, Language and Cognitive Processes 64: 501–38.Find this resource:

Fine, K. 2007. Semantic Relationism, Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Finin, T. 1980. The semantic interpretation of nominal compounds, in Proceedings of the First Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Finke, R. A. 1989. The Principles of Mental Imagery, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fischer, B. 2005. A model of the computations leading to a representation of auditory space in the midbrain of the barn owl. PhD thesis. Washington University in St. Louis.Find this resource:

FitzHugh, R. 1961. Impulses and physiolological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane, Biophysical Journal 1, 445–66.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1970. Three reasons for not deriving ‘kill’ from ‘cause to die’, Linguistic Inquiry 1: 429–38.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell. (p. 685) Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1981a. The current status of the innateness controversy. In Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1981b. The present status of the innateness controversy. In Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1983: The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1984. Observation reconsidered, Philosophy of Science 51: 23–43.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1986: Psychosemantics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1990. A Theory of Content and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1992. A Theory of Content and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1998a. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1998b. There are no recognitional concepts—not even RED, Part 2: The plot thickens. In In Critical Condition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 49–62.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 1999. All at sea in semantic space, Journal of Philosophy 96/8. Reprinted in J. Fodor and E. Lepore, The Compositionality Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 174–200 (page numbers refer to reprint).Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 2000. The Mind Doesn’t Work that Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 2003. Hume Variations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. 2008. LOT2. The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. and E. Lepore. 1991. Why meaning probably isn’t conceptual role, Mind and Language 6: 329–43.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. and E. Lepore. 1992. Holism:A Shopper’s Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. and E. Lepore. 1996. The pet fish and the red herring: Why concepts still can’t be prototypes, Cognition 58 (2): 253–70.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. and E. Lepore. 1998. The emptiness of the lexicon: Reflections on James Pustejovsky’s The Generative Lexicon, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 269–88. Reprinted in J. Fodor and E. Lepore, The Compositionality Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (89–119).Find this resource:

Fodor, J. and E. Lepore. 1999. Impossible words? Linguistic Inquiry 30: 445–53.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. and E. Lepore. 2002. The Compositionality Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. and E. Lepore. 2005. Morphemes matter; the continuing case against lexical decomposition Or: Please don’t play that again, Sam. Rutgers Centre for Cognitive Science Technical Report, MS Rutgers University.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. and B. McLaughlin. 1990. Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky’s solution doesn’t work, Cognition 35: 183–204.Find this resource:

Fodor, J. and Z. Pylyshyn. 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis, Cognition 28: 3–71.Find this resource:

Fodor, J., M. F. Garrett, E. C. T. Walker, and C. H.Parkes. 1980. Against definitions, Cognition 8, 263–7.Find this resource:

Folli, R., H. Harley, and S. Karimi. 2005. Determinants of event structure in Persian complex predicates, Lingua 115(10): 1365–401.Find this resource:

Forbes, G. 2000. Objectual attitudes, Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 141–83.Find this resource:

Forbes, G. 2006. Attitude Problems. An Essay on Linguistic Intensionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Frazier, L. 1987. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance, Volume XII, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 559–86.Find this resource:

Freeze, R. 1992. Existentials and other locatives, Language 68(3): 553–95. (p. 686) Find this resource:

Frege, G. 1879. Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildeten Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, Halle: Nebert. Reprinted in Angelelli 1967, 89–93.Find this resource:

Frege, G. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl, Breslau: W. Koebner. Reprint published by Georg Olms, Hildesheim, 1961; translation by J. L. Austin (with original text): The Foundations of Arithmetic. A logicomathematical enquiry into the concept of number, Oxford Basil Blackwell, 1953.Find this resource:

Frege, G. 1891. Function und Begriff. Jena. Translated by P. Geach as: ‘Function and Concept’. In P. Geach and M. Black (eds), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, 1952, 21–41.Find this resource:

Frege, G. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50. Reprinted in Angelelli (1967), pp. 143–62. Translated by Geach and Black as ‘On sense and reference’ in Geach and Black 1952, 56–78.Find this resource:

Frege, G. 1914. Logic in mathematics. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, and F. Kaulbach (eds), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous Writings, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 72–84. Trans P. Long and R. White.Find this resource:

Frege, G. 1923. Logische Untersuchungen. Dritter Teil: Gedankengefüge, in ‘Beiträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus’, Vol. III, pp. 36–51. Reprinted in Angelelli (1967), 378–94. Translated as ‘Compound thoughts’ in Geach and Stoothoff 1977, 55–78 and Mind 72, 1–17.Find this resource:

Frege, G. 1976. Compound thoughts. In P. Geach and R. H. Stoothoff (eds and trans), Logical investigations. Gottlob Frege, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 55–78. Original work published 1923.Find this resource:

Frege, G. 1980. Brief an Jourdain. In G. Gabriel, F. Kambartel, and C. Thiel (eds), Gottlob Freges Briefwechsel mit D. Hilbert, E. Husserl, B. Russell, sowie ausgewählte Einzelbriefe Freges, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 110–12; also in G. Gabriel et al. (eds), Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980: 78–80 (Original work published 1914.)Find this resource:

Friederici, A. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 78–84.Find this resource:

Fries, P. 2005. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 474–80.Find this resource:

Fries, P., J. Reynolds, A. Rorie, and R. Desimone. 2001. Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention, Science 291: 1560–3.Find this resource:

Fries, P., P. R. Roelfsema, A. K. Engel, P. König, and W. Singer. 1997. Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 94: 12699–704.Find this resource:

Gabriel, G., H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, C. Thiel, and A. Veraart (eds). 1976. Gottlob Frege. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Find this resource:

Gabriel, G., H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, C. Thiel, and A. Veraart (eds). 1980. Gottlob Frege. Philosophical and mathematical correspondence, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Abridged by McGuiness and translated by H. Kaal.Find this resource:

Gagné, C. L. and E. J. Shoben. 1997. Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier–noun combinations, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 71–87.Find this resource:

Gagné, C. L. and Spalding. 2004. Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun-noun compounds, Brain and Language 90 (1–3).Find this resource:

Galantucci, B. 2005. An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems, Cognitive Science 29: 737–67. (p. 687) Find this resource:

Gallistel, C. 1990. The Organization of Learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Gallistel, C. and J. Gibbon. 2002. The Symbolic Foundations of Conditioned Behavior, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Gamerschlag, T. 2005. Komposition undArgumentstrukturkomplexer Verben.Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Find this resource:

García-Carpintero, M. and J. Macia (eds). 2006. Two-dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

García-Carpintero, M. and M. Kölbel (eds). 2008. Relative Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Gardner, H. 1985. The Mind’s New Science. A History of the Cognitive Revolution, New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Garey, M. R. and D. S. Johnson. 1979. Computers and Intractability. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Find this resource:

Garfinkel, A. 1981. Forms of Explanation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Find this resource:

Garrod, S., N. Fay, J. Lee, J. Oberlander, and T. MacLeod. 2007. Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from? Cognitive Science 31: 961–87.Find this resource:

Gayler, R. 2003. Vector symbolic architectures answer Jackendoff ‘s challenges for cognitive neuroscience, ICCS/ASCS International Conference on Cognitive Science, Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales, 133–8.Find this resource:

Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. Pullum, and I. Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Find this resource:

Geach, P. 1972. A program for syntax. In D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds), Semantics for Natural Language, no. 40 in Synthese Library. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Geach, P. T. 1962. Reference and Generality. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Find this resource:

Geach, P. T. and M. Black (eds). 1952. Translations from the Philosphical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Find this resource:

Geach, P. T. and R. Stoothof f (eds). 1977. Logical Investigations. Gottlob Frege, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Find this resource:

Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy, Cognitive Science 7: 155–70.Find this resource:

Gentner, D. 1989. The mechanisms of analogical learing. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds), Similarity, Analogy, and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199–241.Find this resource:

Gerrig, R. J. 1989. The time-course of sense creation, Memory and Cognition 17: 194–207.Find this resource:

Gerrig, R. J. and G. L. Murphy. 1992. Contextual influences on the comprehension of complex concepts, Language and Cognitive Processes 7: 205–30.Find this resource:

Gerrig, R. J. and H. Bortfeld. 1999. Sense creation in and out of discourse contexts, Journal of Memory and Language, 41: 457–68.Find this resource:

Giannakidou, A. and M. Stavrou. 1999. Nominalization and ellipsis in the Greek DP, The Linguistic Review 16: 295–332.Find this resource:

Gibbs, R. W. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gibson, E. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies, Cognition 68: 1–76.Find this resource:

Gigerenzer, G. and D. G. Goldstein. 1996. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality, Psychological Review 103: 650–69.Find this resource:

Gigerenzer, G., P. M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press. (p. 688) Find this resource:

Gillon, B. 2007. Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī and linguistic theory, Journal of Indian Philosophy 35, 445–68.Find this resource:

Ginzburg, J. and R. Cooper. 2004. Clarication, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue, Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3): 297–365.Find this resource:

Ginzburg, J. and Sag, I. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives, Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Glanzberg, M. 2009. Semantics and truth relative to a world, Synthese, 166(2): 281–307, (online 2007).Find this resource:

Gleitmann, L. 1990. The structural sources of verb meanings, Language Acquisition 1: 3–55.Find this resource:

Glenberg, A. M. 1997. What memory is for, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 1–55.Find this resource:

Glucksberg, S. and Z. Estes. 2000. Feature accessibility in conceptual combination: Effects of context-induced relevance, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7: 510–15.Find this resource:

Glüer, K. and P. Pagin. 2006. Proper names and relational modality, Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 507–35.Find this resource:

Glüer, K. and P. Pagin. 2008. Relational modality, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17: 307–22.Find this resource:

Goddard, C. and A. Wierzbicka (eds). 2002. Meaning and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gödel, K. 1932. Zum intuitionistischen Aussagenkalkül. Anzeiger Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien, 69 Math.-nat. Klasse. 65–6.Find this resource:

Gödel, K. 1944. Russell’s Mathematical Philosophy. In P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Evanston and Chicago: North-Western University Press, 125–53.Find this resource:

Gold, E. 1967. Language identification in the limit, Information and Control 16: 447–74.Find this resource:

Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Goldin-Meadow, S. and C. Mylander. 1998. Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures, Nature 391: 279–81.Find this resource:

Goldstein, D. G. and G. Gigerenzer. 2002. Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic, Psychological Review 109: 75–90.Find this resource:

Goldstein, R. 1983. The Mind–Body Problem. New York: Penguin Books.Find this resource:

Goldstone, R. L. 1994. Similarity, interactive activation and mapping, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20: 3–28.Find this resource:

Gómez, R. L. and L. Gerken. 2000. Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 178–86.Find this resource:

Gómez, R. L. and L. A. Gerken. 2001. Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition, in M. Tomasello and E. Bates (eds), Language Development: The Essential Readings, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 42–8.Find this resource:

Gonchar, Y. and A. Burkhalter. 1999. Connectivity of GABAergic calretinin-immunoreactive neurons in rat primary visual cortex, Cerebral Cortex 9: 683–96.Find this resource:

Gopnik, M. and M. B. Crago. 1991. Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder, Cognition 39: 1–50.Find this resource:

Gottwald, S. 2001. A Treatise on Many-valued Logics, Baldock: Research Studies Press.Find this resource:

Gould, S. J. and R. C. Lewontin. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205: 581–98.Find this resource:

Gray, C. M. and G. Viana Di Prisco. 1997. Stimulus-dependent neuronal oscillations and local synchronization in striate cortex of the alert cat, Journal of Neuroscience 179: 3239–53. (p. 689) Find this resource:

Gray, C., P. König, A. K. Engel, and W. Singer. 1989. Oscilliatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties, Nature 338: 334–7.Find this resource:

Gray, K. C. and E. E. Smith. 1995. The role of instance retrieval in understanding complex concepts, Memory and Cognition 23: 665–74.Find this resource:

Green, G. M. 1974. Semantics and Syntactic Regularity, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Find this resource:

Grice, H. P. 1969. Utterer’s meaning and intentions, Philosophical Review, 78: 147–77.Find this resource:

Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts, New York: Academic Press, 41–58.Find this resource:

Griffiths, T. L. and M. L. Kalish. 2007. Language evolution by iterated learning with Bayesian agents, Cognitive Science 31: 441–80.Find this resource:

Griffiths, T. L., B. R. Christian, and M. L. Kalish. 2008. Using category structures to test iterated learning as a method for revealing inductive biases, Cognitive Science 32: 68–107.Find this resource:

Grijzenhout, J. and M. Penke. 2005. On the interaction of phonology and morphology in language acquisition and German and Dutch Broca’s aphasia: the case of inflected verbs, Yearbook of Morphology 2005: 49–81.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, J. and A. Mester. 1988. Light verbs and theta-marking, Linguistic Inquiry 192: 205–32.Find this resource:

Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof. 1982. Semantic analysis of wh-complements, Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 175–233.Find this resource:

Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof. 1991. Dynamic predicate logic, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.Find this resource:

Gross, C. 2002. Genealogy of the ‘grandmother cell’, Neuroscientist 8512. 512–18.Find this resource:

Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse, Computational Linguistics 12(3): 175–204.Find this resource:

Gruppe, O. F. 1834. Wendepunkt der Philosophie in neunzehnten Jahrhundert, Berlin: Reimer.Find this resource:

Guerssel, M., K. Hale, M. Laughren, B. Levin, and J. White Eagle. 1985. A cross-linguistic study of transitivity alternations. In W. H. Eilfort et al. (eds), Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity, Chicago Linguistic Society, 48–63.Find this resource:

Haaparanta, L. 1985. Frege’s Doctrine of Being. Helsinki: Acta Philosophica Fennica 39.Find this resource:

Hacker, P. M. S. 1979. Semantic holism, in C. Luckhardt (ed.), Wittgenstein. Sources and perspectives, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 213–42.Find this resource:

Hagoort, P. 2003. How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing, Neuroimage 20: S18–S29.Find this resource:

Hagoort, P. and C. Brown. 1994. Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, and K. Rayner (eds), Perspectives on Sentence Processing, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 45–81.Find this resource:

Hagoort, P., C. Brown, and J. Groothusen. 1993. The syntactic positive shif t SPS. as an ERP measure of syntactic processing, Language and Cognitive Processes 8: 439–83.Find this resource:

Hagoort, P., C. Brown, and L. Osterhout. 2001. The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. M. Brown and P. Hagoort (eds), The Neurocognition of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273–307.Find this resource:

Hagoort, P., G. Baggio, and R. Willems. 2009. Semantic unification. In M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences, Canbridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hagoort, P., L. Hald, M. Bastiaansen, and K. M. Petersson. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension, Science 304 (5669): 438–41. (p. 690) Find this resource:

Haida, A. 2007. The Indefiniteness and Focusing of Wh-Words. Dissertation, Humboldt-UniversitätBerlin 2007. http://amor.cms.hu-berlin.de/~haidaand/download/Haida2007 Diss.pdf.

Haken, H. 1990. Synergetik, 3rd edn, Berlin: Springer Verlag.Find this resource:

Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. 1992. The syntactic character of thematic structure. In I. M. Roca (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, Berlin: Foris, 107–44.Find this resource:

Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale and J. Keyser (eds), The View from Building 20, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. 1997. On the complex nature of simple predicators. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, and P. Sells (eds), Complex Predicates, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 29–65.Find this resource:

Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Halff, H. M., A. Ortony, and R. C. Anderson. 1976. A context sensitive representation of word meanings, Memory and Cognition 4: 378–83.Find this resource:

Halle, M. and A. Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection, in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds), The View from Building 20, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–76.Find this resource:

Halliday, M. A. K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English, London: Longman.Find this resource:

Hamm, F. and T. E. Zimmermann. 2002. Quantifiers and anaphora. In F. Hamm and T. E. Zimmermann (eds), Semantics. Hamburg: Buske, 137–72.Find this resource:

Hamm, F., H. Kamp, and M. van Lambalgen. 2006. There is no opposition between formal and cognitive semantics, Theoretical Linguistics 32(1): 1–40.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1979. Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 441–61.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1982. A demonstration of intransitivity in natural categories, Cognition 12: 151–64.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1987. Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions, Memory and Cognition 15, 55–71.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1988a. Disjunction of natural concepts, Memory and Cognition 16: 579–91.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1988b. Overextension of conjunctive concepts: Evidence for a unitary model of concept typicality and class inclusion, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 12–32.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1991. The combination of prototype concepts, in P. J. Schwanenflugel (ed.), The Psychology of Word Meanings, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 91–116.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1993. Prototype models of concept representation. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, and P. Theuns (eds), Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis, New York: Academic Press, 67–95.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1995. Testing the prototype theory of concepts, Journal of Memory and Language, 34: 686–708.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1996. Conjunctions of visually based categories: Overextension and compensation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 378–96.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1997a. Conceptual combination: Conjunction and negation of natural concepts, Memory and Cognition 25: 888–909.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1997b. Emergent attributes in conceptual combinations. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, and J. Viad (eds), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes, Washington DC: American Psychological Association Press, 83–110. (p. 691) Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1997c. Conceptual combination. In K. Lamberts and D. Shanks (eds), Knowledge, Concepts, and Categories, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 133–60.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 1998. Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories, Cognition 65: 137–65.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 2000. Concepts and prototypes, Mind and Language 15: 299–307.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 2006. Concepts as prototypes, in B. H. Ross (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 46. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 79–113.Find this resource:

Hampton, J. A. 2007. Typicality, graded membership and vagueness, Cognitive Science 31: 355–83.Find this resource:

Hardt, D. 1993. VP Ellipsis: Form, Meaning, and Processing. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Find this resource:

Harel, D. 1984. Dynamic logic. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2, Dordrecht: Reidel, 497–604.Find this resource:

Harley, H. 1995. Subjects, Events and Licensing. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Find this resource:

Harley, H. 2003. Possession and the double object construction. In P. Pica and J. Rooryck (eds), The Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 29–68.Find this resource:

Harley, H. 2004. Wanting, having, and getting: A note on Fodor and Lepore 1998, Linguistic Inquiry 352: 255–67.Find this resource:

Harley, H. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English, in N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport (eds), The Syntax of Aspect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 42–64.Find this resource:

Harley, H. 2006. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In A. Giannakidou, and A. Rathert (eds), Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Harley, H. 2011. Lexical decomposition, this volume.Find this resource:

Harman, G. 1974. Meaning and semantics. In M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds), Semantics and Philosophy, New York: SUNY Press, 1–16.Find this resource:

Harrell, M. 1996. Confirmation holism and semantic holism. Synthese 109, 63–101.Find this resource:

Hartmanis, J and R. E. Stearns. 1965. On the computational complexity of algorithms, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 117: 285–306.Find this resource:

Harves, S. and R. Kayne. 2008. Having need and needing have in Indo-European. Ms, Pomona College and New York University.Find this resource:

Hastie, R., C. Schroeder, and R. Weber. 1990. Creating complex social conjunction categories from simple categories, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28: 242–7.Find this resource:

Hauser, M. D., N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–79.Find this resource:

Hausser, R. R. 1984. Surface Compositional Grammar, Munich: Wilhelm Finck Verlag.Find this resource:

Hawkins, J. A. 2003. Efficiency and complexity in grammars: Three general principles. In by J. Moore and M. Polinsky (eds), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 121–52.Find this resource:

Hay, J., C. Kennedy, and B. Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements’, in T. Mathews and D. Stolovitch (eds), Proceedings of SALT IX. Ithaca: CLC Publications, 127–44.Find this resource:

Heal, J. 1994. Semantic holism: Still a good buy, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94, 325–39.Find this resource:

Hebb, D. O. 1949. The Organization of Behavior, New York: Wiley. (p. 692) Find this resource:

Heck, R. 2001. Do demonstratives have senses? Philosophers’ Imprint, 2(2): 1–33.Find this resource:

Heider (= Rosch), E. 1971. Focal colour areas and the development of colour names, Developmental Psychology 4: 447–55.Find this resource:

Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Find this resource:

Heim, I. and A. Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Find this resource:

Heit, E. and L. W. Barsalou. 1996. The instantiation principle in natural categories, Memory 4: 413–51.Find this resource:

Hempel, C. 1950. Problems and changes in the empiricist criterion of meaning, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4, 41–63.Find this resource:

Hempel, C. G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanations, New York: Free Press.Find this resource:

Hendriks, H. 1993. Studied Flexibility. Categories and Types in Syntax and Semantics. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Hendriks, H. 2001. Compositionality and model-theoretic interpretation, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10: 29–48.Find this resource:

Henkin, L. J. D. Monk, and A. Tarski. 1971. Cylindric algebras. Part I, nr. 64 in Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, Amsterdam: North Holland.Find this resource:

Hermes, H., F. Kambartel, and F. Kaulbach (eds). 1969. Gottlob Frege. Nachgelassene Schriften, Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Find this resource:

Hermes, H., F. Kambartel, and F. Kaulbach (eds). 1979. Gottlob Frege. Posthumous writings, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, transl. by P. Long and R. White.Find this resource:

Herrmann, C. S., M. H. J. Munk, and A. K. Engel. 2004. Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: Memory match and utilization, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 347–55.Find this resource:

Hess, T. M., S. M. Pullen, and K. A. McGee. 1996. Acquisition of prototype-based information about social groups in adulthood, Psychology and Aging 11 (1), 179–90.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, J. 1983. The logical form of perceptual reports, Journal of Philosophy 80: 100–27.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, J. 1985. On semantics, Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–93.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, J. 2007. Some consequences of compositionality, in G. Ramchand and C. Reiss (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 425–44.Find this resource:

Higginbotham, J. no date. Some consequences of compositionality, manuscript.Find this resource:

Hill, J. C. 1983. A computational model of language acquisition in the two-year-old, Cognition and Brain Theory 6: 287–317.Find this resource:

Hintikka, J. 1980. On the any-thesis and the methodology of linguistics, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 101–22.Find this resource:

Hintikka, J. 1983. The Game of Language. Studies in Game-Theoretical Semantics and its Applications, Synthese Language Library, Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Hintikka, J. 1984. A hundred years later: The rise and fall of Frege’s influence in language theory, Synthese 59, 27–49.Find this resource:

Hintikka, J. 1996. The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu. 1989. Informational independence as a semantical phenomenon. In J. E. Fenstad et al. (eds), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VIII, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 571–89.Find this resource:

Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu. 1997. Game-theoretical semantics. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (ed.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 361–410. (p. 693) Find this resource:

Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu. 1999. Tarski’s guilty secret: compositionality, in J. Wolenski and E. Köhler (eds). Alfred Tarski and the Vienna circle, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 217–30.Find this resource:

Hinton, G. (ed.), 1990. Special issue on connectionist symbol processing, Artificial Intelligence 46.Find this resource:

Hinton, G. 1992. How neural networks learn from experience, Scientific American 11: 145–51.Find this resource:

Hinzen, W. 2006a. Mind Design and Minimal Syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hinzen, W. 2006b. Dualism and the atoms of thought, Journal of Consciousness Studies 13(9): 25–55.Find this resource:

Hinzen, W. 2007. An Essay on Naming and Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hinzen, W. 2008. Succ + Lex = Language?, in Grohmann,K. (ed.), InterPhases:PhaseTheoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–47.Find this resource:

Hinzen, W. 2009. Hierarchy, Merge, and Truth. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini, P. Salaburu, and J. Uriagereka (eds), Of Minds and Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123–41.Find this resource:

Hinzen, W. and J. Uriagereka. 2006. On the metaphysics of linguistics, Erkenntnis 65(1): 71–96.Find this resource:

Hobbs, J. R. 1979. Coherence and coreference, Cognitive Science 3(1): 67–90.Find this resource:

Hobbs, J. 1985. Ontological promiscuity. Proceedings, 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Chicago, Illinois, July, 61–9.Find this resource:

Hockett, C. F. 1960. The origin of speech, Scientific American 203: 88–96.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 1997a. Compositional semantics for a language of imperfect information, Logic Journal of the IGPL 5(4): 539–63.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 1997b. Some strange quantifiers, in J. Mycielski et al. (eds), Structures in Logic and Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1261, Berlin: Springer, 51–65.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 1998. Compositionality is not the problem, Logic and Logical Philosophy 6: 7–33.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 2001. Formal features of compositionality, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10: 7–28.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 2005. A context principle, in R. Kahle (ed.), Intensionality, Wellesley, MA: Association for Symbolic Logic and A. K. Peters, 42–59.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 2006a. Two doors to open. In D. Gabbay, S. Goncharov, and M. Zakharyaschev (eds), Mathematical Problems from Applied Logic I: New Logics for the 21st Century, New York: Springer, 277–316.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 2006b. From sentence meanings to full semantics. Unpublished manuscript.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 2007. Logics of imperfect information: Why sets of assignments?, in J. van Benthem et al. (eds), Interactive Logic, Selected Papers from the 7th Augustus De Morgan Workshop, London and Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 117–33.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 2008a. From sentence meanings to full semantics, in A. Gupta et al. (eds), Logic at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary View I, New Delhi, Allied Publishers, 399–416.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. 2008b. Tarski’s theory of definition, in D. E. Patterson (ed.), New Essays on Tarski and Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 94–132.Find this resource:

Hodges, W. Submitted. Requirements on a theory of sentence and word meanings, in R. Schantz (ed.), Prospects for Meaning, New York: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Hoefler, S. 2006. Why has ambiguous syntax emerged? In A. Cangelosi, A. D. M. Smith, and K. Smith (eds), The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, Singapore: World Scientific, 123–30.Find this resource:

Holyoak, K. J. and P. Thagard. 1989. Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction, Cognitive Science 13: 295–355. (p. 694) Find this resource:

Hopfield, J. 1982. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 79: 2554–8.Find this resource:

Horgan, T. 1997. Modelling the noncomputational mind: Reply to Litch, Philosophical Psychology 10: 365–71.Find this resource:

Horgan, T. and J. Tienson. 1996. Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hornstein, N. and P. Pietroski. 2009. Basic operations, Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 113–39.Find this resource:

Horty, J. 2007. Frege on Definitions: A Case Study of Semantic Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Horwich, P. 1997. The composition of meanings, Philosophical Review 106: 503–32.Find this resource:

Horwich, P. 1998. Meaning, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Horwich, P. 2001. Deflating compositionality, Ratio 14: 369–85.Find this resource:

Huang, J. T. 1995. Logical form. In G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Hubel, D. H. and T. N. Wiesel. 1968. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex, Journal of Physiology 195: 215–43.Find this resource:

Hudson Kam, C. L. and E. L. Newport. 2005. Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change, Language Learning and Development 1: 151–95.Find this resource:

Hume, D. 1739. A treatise of human nature: Being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. In D. F. Norton and M. J. Norton (eds), Cambridge: Oxford Philosophical Texts.Find this resource:

Hummel, J. E. and Holyoak, K. J. 1998. Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping, Psychological Review 104: 427–66.Find this resource:

Hummel, J. E. and K. J. Holyoak. 2003. A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization, Psychological Review 110(2), 220–64.Find this resource:

Hummel, J. E., B. Burns, and K. J. Holyoak. 1994. Analogical mapping by dynamic binding: Preliminary investigations. In K. J. Holyoak and J. A. Barnden (eds), Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory: Analogical connections, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Find this resource:

Hung, H.-K. and J. I. Zucker. 1991. Semantics of pointers, referencing and dereferencing with intensional logic, in Proceedings of the 6th annual IEEE symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Los Almolitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 127–36.Find this resource:

Hurford, J. R. 1990. Nativist and functional explanations in language acquisition. In I. M. Roca (ed.), Logical Issues in Language Acquisition, Dordrecht: Foris, 85–136.Find this resource:

Hurford, J. R. 2007. The Origins of Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University PressFind this resource:

Husserl, E. 1900. Logische Untersuchungen, band ii. Berlin: Halle. Section references to the translation (of the 1913 2nd edn) by J. M. Findlay, 1970, as Logical Investigations, Vol. 2, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Find this resource:

Ibn Sīnā 1970. Al-shifā’: Al-mantiq III, Al-’ c ibāra, M. El-Khodeiri (ed.), Cairo: Dar El-Katib al- c Arabi.Find this resource:

Ibn Sīnā 2002. Al-’ishārāt wa-l-tanbiyyāt, ed. M. Zāre’ī (ed.), Qum: Bū stān-e ketab-e Qom.Find this resource:

Inati, S. 1984. Ibn Sina on single expressions, in M. Marmura (ed.), Islamic Theology and Philosophy: Studies in Honor of George F. Hourani, Albany NY: State University of New York Press, 148–59.Find this resource:

Israel, D. and J. Perry. 1996. Where monsters dwell. In J. Seligman and D. Westerståhl (eds), Logic, Language, Computation, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 303–16. (p. 695) Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. 1992. Babe Ruth Homered his way into the hearts of America, in T. Stowell and E. Wehrli (eds), Syntax and the Lexicon, Academic Press, San Diego, 155–78.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. 1996. Semantics and cognition. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, 539–59.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution, New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Jacobsen, W. M. 1981. Transitivity in the Japanese Verbal System. Doctoral dissertation. Chicago: University of Chicago.Find this resource:

Jacobson, P. 1987. Phrase structure, grammatical relations, and discontintinuous constituteunts, in G. Huck and A. Ojeda (eds), Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituency, New York: Academic Press, 27–69.Find this resource:

Jacobson, P. 1992a. Flexible categorial grammars: Questions and prospects, in R. Levine (ed.), Formal Grammar: Theory and Implementation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129–67.Find this resource:

Jacobson, P. 1992b. Antecedent contained deltion in a variable-free semantics, in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Sematnics and Linguistic Theory, Columbus: Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics, 193–213.Find this resource:

Jacobson, P. 1999. Towards a variable free semantics, Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 117–84.Find this resource:

Jacobson, P. 2002. The (dis)oganizaiton of the grammar: 25 years, Lingusitics and Philosophy 25(5–6): 601–26.Find this resource:

Jacobson, P. 2003. Binding without pronouns (and pronouns without binding), in G.-J. Kruiff and R. Oerhle (eds), Binding and Resource Sensitivity, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 57–96.Find this resource:

Jacobson, P. 2007. Direct compositionality and variable-free semantics: The case of antecedent contained deletion, in K. Johnson (ed.), Topics in Ellipsis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Jacobson, P. 2009. Do representations matter or do meanings matter: The case of antecedent containment. In E. Hinrichs and J. Nerbonne (eds), Theory and Evidence in Semantics: Papers in Honor of David R. Dowty, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 81–107.Find this resource:

Jäger, G. and Blutner, R. 2000. Against lexical decomposition in syntax. In A. Z. Wyner (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference, of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Haifa: University of Haifa. Downloadable at http://semanticsarchive.net/ Archive/mRkMTJiO/rbgjIATL15.pdf. Reprinted in R. Blutner and G. Jäger (eds), Studies in Optimality Theory, University of Potsdam, 5–29.Find this resource:

Janssen, T. 1983. Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar, Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.Find this resource:

Janssen, T. M. V. 1986. Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar. Part 1: Philosophy, framework, computer science, no. 19 in CWI tracts, Amsterdam: Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science.Find this resource:

Janssen, T. M. V. 1997. Compositionality (with an appendix by B. Partee), in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds), Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 417–73. (p. 696) Find this resource:

Janssen, T. M. V. 2001. Frege, contextuality and compositionality, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10(1): 115–36.Find this resource:

Janssen, T. M. V. and P. van Emde Boas. 1977a. The expressive power of intensional logic in the semantics of programming languages, in J. Gruska (ed.), Mathematical foundations of computer science 1977 (Proceedings of the 6th symposium Tatranska Lomnica), no. 53 in Lecture notes in computer science, Berlin: Springer, 303–11.Find this resource:

Janssen, T. M. V. and P. van Emde Boas. 1977b. On the proper treatment of referencing, dereferencing and assignment, in A. Salomaa and M. Steinby (eds), Automata, languages and programming (Proceedings of the 4th coll. Turku), no. 52 in Lecture notes in computer science, Berlin: Springer, 282–300.Find this resource:

Jelinek, E. 1998. Voice and transitivity as functional projections in Yaqui. In M. Butt and W. Geuder (eds), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Stanford: CSLI, 177–206.Find this resource:

Johnson, K. 2004a. On the systematicity of language and thought, Journal of Philosophy 101, 111–39.Find this resource:

Johnson, K. 2004b. From impossible words to conceptual structure: the role of structure and processes in the lexicon, Mind and Language 19(3): 334–58.Find this resource:

Jönsson, M. L. 2008. On Compositionality: Doubts about The Structural Path to Meaning, PhD Thesis, Department of Philosophy, Lund University.Find this resource:

Jönsson, M. L. and J. A. Hampton. 2006. The inverse conjunction fallacy, Journal of Memory and Language 55, 317–34.Find this resource:

Jönsson, M. L. and J. A. Hampton. 2008. On prototypes as defaults (Comment on Connolly, Fodor, Gleitman and Gleitman, 2007). Cognition 106, 913–23.Find this resource:

Jönsson, M. L. and J. A. Hampton. 2011. The modifier effect in within-category induction: Default inheritance in complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, (forthcoming).Find this resource:

Jusczyk, P. W. 2001. Finding and remembering words: Some beginnings by English-learning infants, in M. Tomasello and E. Bates (eds), Language Development: The Essential Readings, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 19–25.Find this resource:

Juslin, P., and M. Persson. 2002. PROBabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): a ‘Lazy’ Algorithm for Probabilistic Inference from Generic Knowledge, Cognitive Science 26: 563–607.Find this resource:

Kalish, M. L., T. L. Griffiths, and S. Lewandowsky. 2007. Iterated learning: Intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 14: 288–94.Find this resource:

Kamiński, M., M. Ding, W. Truccolo, and S. Bressler. 2001. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance, Biological Cybernetics 85, 145–57.Find this resource:

Kamp, H. 1971. Formal properties of ‘now’, Theoria 37: 227–74.Find this resource:

Kamp, H. 1975. Two theories of adjectives. In E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kamp, H. 1979. Events, instants and temporal reference. In R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds), Semantics from Different Points of View, Berlin: Springer, 27–54.Find this resource:

Kamp, H. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Amsterdam: CWI, 1–14. Reprinted in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds), Truth, Interpretation and Information, Dordrecht:Foris, 1984, 115–43, and in Portnerand Partee 2002, 189–222. (p. 697) Find this resource:

Kamp, H. 1990. Prolegomena to a structural account of belief and other attitudes. In C. A. Anderson and J. Owens (eds), Propositional Attitudes, CSLI Lecture Notes Number 20, Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Kamp, H. and B. Partee.. 1995. Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57 (2): 129–91.Find this resource:

Kamp, H. and U. Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Kant, I. 1781. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Berlin: Reimer.Find this resource:

Kaplan, D. 1975. How to Russell a Frege-Church, Journal of Philosophy 72: 716–29.Find this resource:

Kaplan, D. 1977. Demonstratives, presented at the 1977 meeting of the Pacific Division of the American Philosophical Association.Find this resource:

Kaplan, D. 1979. On the logic of demonstratives, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1).Find this resource:

Kaplan, D. 1989. Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 481–566.Find this resource:

Kaplan, R. and J. Bresnan. 1982. Lexical-Functional Grammar:a formal system for grammatical representation, in J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 173–281.Find this resource:

Karttunen, L. 1976. Discourse referents. In J. McCawley (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground, New York: Academic Press, 363–85.Find this resource:

Katz, J. 1964. Semantic theory and the meaning of good, Journal of Philosophy 61 (23): 739–66.Find this resource:

Katz, J. 1966. The Philosophy of Language, London: Harper and Row.Find this resource:

Katz, J. 1972. Semantic Theory, New York: Harper& Row.Find this resource:

Katz, J. 1994. Names without bearers, Philosophical Review 103: 1–39.Find this resource:

Katz, J. and J. Fodor. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory, Language 39, 170–210.Find this resource:

Kaufmann, I. 1995a. Die Kombinatorik lokaler Verben und prädikativer Argumente, Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Kaufmann, I. 1995b. What is an impossible verb? Restrictions on Semantic Form and their consequences for argument structure, Folia Linguistica 29: 67–103.Find this resource:

Kaufmann, I. and D. Wunderlich. 1998. Cross-linguistic patterns of resultatives. Working Papers SFB 282 Theory of the Lexicon, #109. University of Düsseldorf.Find this resource:

Kayne, R. 1993. Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection, Studia Linguistica 47(1): 3–31.Find this resource:

Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Kayne, R. 2008. Antisymmetry and the Lexicon. Ms. New York University. Downloadable at http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000598.Find this resource:

Kazmi, A. and F. Pelletier 1998. Is compositionality formally vacuous? Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 629–33.Find this resource:

Keane, M. T., T. Ledgeway, and S. Duff. 1994. Constraints on analogical mapping:A comparison of three models, Cognitive Science 18: 387–438.Find this resource:

Keefe, R. and P. Smith. 1997. Theories of vagueness, in R. Keefe and P. Smith (eds), Vagueness: A Reader, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–57.Find this resource:

Keenan, E. 1979. On surface form and logical form, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 8: 163–203.Find this resource:

Keenan, E. L. and L. L. Faltz. 1985. Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

Keenan, E. and E. Stabler. 2003. Bare Grammar, Stanford: CSLI.Find this resource:

Kehler, A. 2002. Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar, Stanford:CSLI Publications. (p. 698) Find this resource:

Keil, F. C. 1989. Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Keller, R. 1994. On Language Change: the Invisible Hand in Language, London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Kempson, R. and A. Cormack. 1981. Ambiguity and quantification, Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 259–309.Find this resource:

Kennedy, C. 1999. Gradable adjectives denote measure functions, not partial functions, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29(1).Find this resource:

Kennedy, C. and L. McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates, Language 81: 345–81.Find this resource:

Kim, A. and L. Osterhout. 2005. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials, Journal of Memory and Language 52: 205–25.Find this resource:

King, J. C. 2003. Tense, modality, and semantic values. In J. Hawthorne and D. Zimmerman, (eds), Philosophical Perspectives 17: Language and Philosophical Linguistics, 195–246.Find this resource:

King, J. C. 2011. Structured propositions. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/propositionsstructured/, Fall.Find this resource:

King, J. C. and J. Stanley. 2005. Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. In Zoltan Szabó (ed.), Semantics versus Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 111–64.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. Remarks on denominal verbs. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, and P. Sells (eds) Complex Predicates, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 473–99.Find this resource:

Kirby, S. 1999a. Function, Selection and Innateness: The emergence of language universals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kirby, S. 1999b. Syntax out of learning: The cultural evolution of structured communication in a population of induction algorithms. In D. Floreano, J. D. Nicoud, and F. Mondada (eds), Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Artificial Life, Berlin: Springer, 694–703.Find this resource:

Kirby, S. 2000. Syntax without natural selection: How compositionality emerges from vocabulary in a population of learners. In C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy, and J. Hurford (eds), The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–23.Find this resource:

Kirby, S. 2001. Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: An iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5: 102–10.Find this resource:

Kirby, S. 2002. Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax. In E. Briscoe (ed.), Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 173–203.Find this resource:

Kirby, S. and J. R. Hurford. 2002. The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model. In A. Cangelosi and D. Parisi (eds), Simulating the Evolution of Language, Springer Verlag, 121–47.Find this resource:

Kirby, S., H. Cornish, and K. Smith. 2008. Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (31): 10681–6.Find this resource:

Kirschbaum, I. 2002. Schrecklich nett und voll verrückt. Muster der Adjektiv-Intensivierung im Deutschen. Dissertation. Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorf. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=969264437.

Kleiber, G. 1998. Prototypensemantik, Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Find this resource:

Klein, E. and I. A. Sag. 1985. Type-driven translation, Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 163–201. (p. 699) Find this resource:

Kobele, G. 2006. Generating Copies: An Investigation into Structural Identity in Language and Grammar. PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, UCLA.Find this resource:

Koch, C. and T. Poggio. 1992. Multiplying with synapses and neurons. In T. McKenna, J. Davis, and S. F. Zornetzer (eds), Single Neuron Computation, Boston, MA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Kölbel, M. 2004. Faultless disagreement, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104: 53–73.Find this resource:

König, P. and T. B. Schillen. 1991. Stimulus-dependent assembly formation of oscillatory responses: I. Synchronization, Neural Computation 3: 155–66.Find this resource:

König, P., A. K. Engel, and W. Singer. 1996. Integrator or coincidence detector? The role of the cortical neuron revisited, Trends in Neurosciences 19: 130–7.Find this resource:

Konorski, J. 1967. Integrative Activity of the Brain; An Interdisciplinary Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche 1991. The position of subjects, in Lingua, 85(1): 211–58.Find this resource:

Koster-Moeller, J., J. Varvoutis, and M. Hackl. 2006. Processing evidence for quantifier raising: The case of antecedent contained deletion, in Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Cornell University: CLS Publications.Find this resource:

Kracht, M. 2001. Strict compositionality and literal movement grammar. In M. Moortgat (ed.), Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, Berlin: Springer LNAI.Find this resource:

Kracht, M. 2003. The Mathematics of Language, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Kracht, M. 2007. Compositionality: the very idea, Research on Language and Computation 5: 287–308.Find this resource:

Kracht, M. 2011. Interpreted Language and Compositionality, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Find this resource:

Kratzer, A. 1993. On external arguments, University of Massachusetts Amherst Occasional Papers 17. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, 103–30.Find this resource:

Kratzer, A. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

Kreisel, G. and J. Krivine. 1976. Elements of Mathematical Logic. Model Theory, no. 2 in Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, Amsterdam: North Holland.Find this resource:

Kreiser, L. 2001. Gottlob Frege. Leben-Werk-Zeit, Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Find this resource:

Kreiter, A. K. and W. Singer. 1994. Global stimulus arrangement determines synchronization of neuronal activity in the awake macaque monkey, Supplement European Journal of Neuroscience 7: 153.Find this resource:

Krifka, M. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution, and quantification in event semantics. In J. van Benthem, R. Bartsch, and P. van Emde Boas (eds), Semantics and Contextual Expression, Dordrecht: Foris, 75–115.Find this resource:

Krifka, M. 1992a. Definite NPs aren’t quantifiers, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 157–62.Find this resource:

Krifka, M. 1992b. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution, in I. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds), Lexical Matters, CSLI Lecture Notes, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Krifka, M. 1999. At least some determiners aren’t determiners, in K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., 257–91.Find this resource:

Krifka, M. 2001a. Compositionality. In R. A. Wilson and F. Keil (eds), The MIT Encyclopaedia of the Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 152–3.Find this resource:

Krifka, M. 2001b. For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. In C. Fery and W. Sternefeld (eds), Audiatur Vox Sapientia. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 287–319. (p. 700) Find this resource:

Krifka, M. 2004. Lexical representations and the nature of the dative alternation, Korean Jounal of English Language and Linguistics 4: 1–32.Find this resource:

Kripke, S. 1976. Is there a problem about substitutional quantification?, in G. Evans and J. H. McDowell (eds), Truth and Meaning. Essays in semantics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 325–419.Find this resource:

Kripke, S. 1979. Speaker’s reference and semantic reference, Midwest Studies 2: 255–76.Find this resource:

Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Kuhn, W. 1990. Untersuchungen zum Problem der seriellen Verben, Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Kunda, Z., D. T. Miller, and T. Claire. 1990. Combining social concepts: The role of causal reasoning, Cognitive Science 14, 551–77.Find this resource:

Kuo, D. and C. Eliasmith. 2005. Integrating behavioral and neural data in a model of zebrafish network interaction, Biological Cybernetics 933: 178–87.Find this resource:

Kuperberg, G. R., A. Choi, N. Cohn, M. Paczynski and R. Jackendoff. 2010. Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22, 2685–701.Find this resource:

Kupffer, M. 2008. An unintentional defense of the indeterminacy of meaning?, Erkenntnis 68: 225–38.Find this resource:

Kutas, M. and S. Hillyard. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity, Science 207: 203–5.Find this resource:

Kutas, M. and S. Hillyard. 1984. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association, Nature 307, 161–3.Find this resource:

Lachaux, J.-P., E. Rodriguez, J. Martinerie, and F. Varela. 1999. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals, Human Brain Mapping 8, 194–208.Find this resource:

Lahav, R. 1989. Against compositionality: The case of adjectives, Philosophical Studies 57: 261–79.Find this resource:

Lakoff, G. 1970. Linguistics and natural logic, Synthese 22: 151–271.Find this resource:

Lakoff, G. 1971. On generative semantics, in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds), Semantics, Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press, 232–96.Find this resource:

Lakoff, G. 1986. Classifiers as a reflection of the mind. In C. Craig (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization, Amsterdam: Benjamin, 13–51.Find this resource:

Lakoff, G. 1987a. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Lakoff, G. 1987b. Cognitive models and prototype theory. In E. Margolis, and S. Laurence (eds), Concepts: Core Readings, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 391–424.Find this resource:

Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we Live by, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Landau, B. 1982. Will the real grandmother please stand up? The psychological reality of dual meaning, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11: 47–62.Find this resource:

Langacker, R. W. 1986. An introduction to cognitive grammar,Cognitive Science 10: 1–40.Find this resource:

Langacker, R. W. 1987a. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol. 1 Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Langacker, R. W. 1987b. Nouns and verbs, Language 63: 53–94.Find this resource:

Langacker, R. W. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Larson, R. 1988. On the double object construction, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91.Find this resource:

Larson, R. and G. Segal. 1995. Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lasersohn, P. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste, Linguistics and Philosophy, 28: 643–86. (p. 701) Find this resource:

Laurier, D. 1996. Function, normality, and temporality. In M. Marion and R. S. Cohen (eds), Québec Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 25–52.Find this resource:

Lawrence, S. and E. Margolis. 1999. Review of Jerry A. Fodor ‘Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong’, British Journal of Philosophy of Science 50: 487–91.Find this resource:

Leech, G., P. Rayson, and A. Wilson. 2001. Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: based on the British National Corpus, London: Longman.Find this resource:

Lefebvre, C. and A.-M. Brousseau. 2002. A Grammar of Fongbe, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Leitgeb, H. 2005. Hodges’ theorem does not account for determinacy of translation: a reply to Werning, Erkenntnis 62: 411–25.Find this resource:

Leslie, A. 1984. Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causation in infants, Perception 13: 287–305.Find this resource:

Levi, J. N. 1978. The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals, New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1991. Wiping the slate clean, Cognition 41: 123–51.Find this resource:

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Semantics Interface, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1999. Two structures for compositionally derived events. In T. Matthews and D. Strolovich (eds) Semantics and linguistic theory =SALT 9, Ithaca: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publishing, 199–223.Find this resource:

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument Realization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav. 2007. Reflections on the complementarity of manner and result. Talk at ZAS Berlin, 21 November.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. 1970. General Semantics, Synthese 22: 18–67, reprinted in B. H. Partee (ed.)n Montague Grammar, New York: Academic Press Inc, 1976, 1–50.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. K. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In E. L. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–15.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 339–59.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. 1980. Index, context, and content. In S. Kanger and S. Öhman (eds), Philosophy and Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel; reprinted in Lewis 1998, 21–44.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. 1998. Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. and S. Lewis. 1970. Holes, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48, 206–12.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. and S. Lewis. 1996. Review of Casati and Varzi (1994), Philosophical Review 105, 77–9.Find this resource:

Li, Ming and Vitányi. 1997. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications 2nd edn, New York: Springer.Find this resource:

Li, X., P. Hagoort, and Y. Yang. 2008. Event-related potential evidence on the influence of accentuation in spoken discourse comprehension in Chinese, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 906–15.Find this resource:

Li, Z. 2000. Pre-attentive segmentation in the primary visual cortex, Spatial Vision 131: 25–50.Find this resource:

Lieberman, E., J.-B. Michel1, J. Jackson, T. Tang, and M. A. Nowak. 2007. Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language, Nature 449: 713–16.Find this resource:

Lively, S. E., D. B. Pisoni, and S. D. Goldinger. 1994. Spoken word recognition: Research and theory, in M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, San Diego: Academic Press, 265–301. (p. 702) Find this resource:

Löbner, S. 1979. Intensionale Verben und Funktionalbegriffe. Untersuchung zur Syntax und Semantik von wechseln und den vergleichbaren Verben des Deutschen, Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

Löbner, S. 1987. Natural language and generalized quantifier theory, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers: linguistic and logical approaches, Dordrecht: Reidel, 181–201.Find this resource:

Löbner, S. 1990. Wahr neben Falsch. Duale Operatoren als die Quantoren natürlicher Sprache, Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Löbner, S. 2000. Polarity in natural language: predication, quantification and negation in particular and characterizing sentences, Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 213–308.Find this resource:

Locke, J. 1968. An essay concerning human understanding, Cleveland, Ohio: World Publishing Co. Original publication 1690.Find this resource:

Longobardi, G. 1994. Reference and proper names, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–65.Find this resource:

Lotze, H. 1874. Logik, Leipzig: Hirzel. second edition 1880.Find this resource:

Luck, S. 2005. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lyons, D. M. and M. A. Arbib. 1989. A formal model of computation for sensory-based robotics, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 5: 280–93.Find this resource:

Macdonald, C. and G. Macdonald. (eds), 1995. Connectionism: Debates on Psychological Explanation. Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

MacFarlane, J. 2003. Future contingents and relative truth. The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(212): 321–36.Find this resource:

MacFarlane, J. 2005. Making sense of relative truth, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105: 321–39.Find this resource:

MacFarlane, J. 2007. Relativism and disagreement, Philosophical Studies, 132(1): 17–31.Find this resource:

MacFarlane, J. 2008. Truth in the garden of forking paths. In García-Carpintero and Kölbel, 2008, 81–102.Find this resource:

MacFarlane, J. 2009. Nonindexical contextualism. Synthese, 166(2): 231–50.Find this resource:

Machery, E. 2005. Concepts are not a natural kind, Philosophy of Science 72: 444–67.Find this resource:

Machery, E. 2009. Doing without Concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

MacNeilage, P. F. and B. L. Davis. 2005. The frame/content theory of evolution of speech: Comparison with a gestural origins theory, Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 6: 173–99.Find this resource:

Mahesh, K. I., K. P. Eiselt, and J. K. Holbrook. 1999. Sentence Processing in Understanding: Interaction and Integration of Knowledge Sourc es. In A. Ram and K. Moorman (ed.), Understanding Language Understanding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Mann, W. C. and S. A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization, Text 8(3): 243–81.Find this resource:

Marantz, A. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Marantz, A. 1996. Cat as a phrasal idiom MS, MIT.Find this resource:

Marantz, A. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon, University of Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2).Find this resource:

Marcus, G. F. 1998a. Can connectionism save constructivism?, Cognition 66: 153–82.Find this resource:

Marcus, G. F. 1998b. Rethinking eliminative connectionism, Cognitive Psychology 37: 243–82.Find this resource:

Marcus, G. F. 2001. The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Marcus, G. F., S. Pinker, M. Ullman, M. Hollander, T. J. Rosen, and F. Xu. 1992. Overregularization in Language Acquisition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Marcus, G. F., U. Brinkmann, H. Clahsen, R. Wiese, and S. Pinker. 1995. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule, Cognitive Psychology 29: 189–256. (p. 703) Find this resource:

Marcus, R. 1962. Interpreting quantification, Inquiry 5, 252–9.Find this resource:

Margolis, E. and S. Laurence. 1999a. Concepts: Core Readings, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Margolis, E. and S. Laurence. 1999b. Concepts and cognitive science. In E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds), Concepts: Core Readings, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–82.Find this resource:

Markman, A. B. and D. Gentner. 1993. Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity, Journal of Memory and Language 32: 517–35.Find this resource:

Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, San Francisco: Freeman and Company.Find this resource:

Mates, B. 1950. Synonymity, University of Calfornia Publications in Philosophy 25, 201–226. Reprinted in L. Linsky (ed.) Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1952.Find this resource:

Mateu, J. 2005. Impossible primitives. In M. Werning et al. (eds), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content: Foundational Issues. Frankfurt: Ontos Press, 213–29.Find this resource:

Matushansky, O. 2006. Why rose is the rose: on the use of definite articles in names, Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6: 285–307.Find this resource:

May, R. 1977. The Grammar of Quantification. PhD Dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Find this resource:

Maye, A. 2003. Correlated neuronal activity can represent multiple binding solutions, Neurocomputing 52–54: 73–7.Find this resource:

Maye, A. and M. Werning. 2004. Temporal binding of non-uniform objects, Neurocomputing 58–60: 941–8.Find this resource:

Maye, A. and M. Werning. 2007. Neuronal synchronization: From dynamic feature binding to object representations, Chaos and Complexity Letters 22/3. 315–25.Find this resource:

Mazurkiewicz, A. 1975. Parallel recursive program schemes, in J. Becvar (ed.), Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (4th. coll., Marianske Lazne), no. 32 in Lecture notes in computer science, Berlin: Springer, 75–87.Find this resource:

McCarthy, J. 1986. Application of circumscription to formalizing common-sense knowledge, Artificial Intelligence 13: 89–116.Find this resource:

McCawley, J. D. 1968. Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure/Chicago Linguistic Society 4: 71–80.Find this resource:

McCawley, J. 1970. Where do noun phrases come from?”, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Waltham, MA: Ginn & Co., 166–83.Find this resource:

McCawley, J. D. 1971. Prelexical syntax. In R. O’Brien (ed.), Report on the 22nd Roundtable Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 19–33.Find this resource:

McCawley, J. D. 1974. On identifying the remains of deceased clauses, Language Research 9: 73–85.Find this resource:

McCawley, J. 1981. The syntax and semantics of English relative clauses, Lingua 53: 99–149.Find this resource:

McClelland, J. L. and D. C. Plaut. 1999. Does generalization in infant learning implicate abstract algebra-like rules? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 3: 166–8.Find this resource:

McElree, B., M. Traxler, M. Pickering, R. Seely, and R. Jackendoff. 2001. Reading time evidence for enriched composition, Cognition 780010–0277 Print: B17–25.Find this resource:

McElree, B., G. Murphy, and T. Ochoa. 2006a. Time course of retrieving conceptual information: A speed–accuracy trade-off study, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13: 848–53.Find this resource:

McElree, B., L. Pylkkanen, M. Pickering, and M. Traxler. 2006b. A time course analysis of enriched composition, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 131: 53–59.Find this resource:

McGinnis, M. 2002. On the systematic aspect of idioms, Linguistic Inquiry 33(4): 665–72.Find this resource:

McGonigle, B. O. and M. Chalmers. 2006. Ordering and executive functioning as a window on the evolution and development of cognitive systems, International Journal of Comparative Psychology. Special issue on Development, Evolution and Comparative Psychology and development of cognitive systems 19, 241–67. (p. 704) Find this resource:

McLaughlin, B. 1992. The rise and fall of British emergentism. In A. Beckermann, H. Flohr, and J. Kim (eds), Emergence or Reduction?, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 49–93.Find this resource:

McLaughlin, B. P. 1993. The connectionism/classicism battle to win souls, Philosophical Studies 71: 163–90.Find this resource:

McLaughlin, B. 1995. Classical constituents in Smolensky’s ICS Architecture. In M. L. D. Chiara, K. Doets, D. Mundici, and J. van Bentham (eds), Structures and Norms in Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

McQueen, J. M. and A. Cutler. 1998. Morphology in word recognition. In A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds), Handbook of Morphology, Oxford: Blackwell, 406–27.Find this resource:

Medin, D. L. and M. M. Schaffer. 1978. Context theory of classification learning, Psychological Review 85: 207–38.Find this resource:

Medin, D. L. and E. J. Shoben. 1988. Context and structure in conceptual combination, Cognitive Psychology 20: 158–90.Find this resource:

Medin, D. L., R. L. Goldstone, and D. Gentner. 1993. Respects for similarity, Psychological Review 100: 254–78.Find this resource:

Mel, B. W. 1994. Information processing in dendritic trees, Neural Computation, 66: 1031–85.Find this resource:

Mervis, C. B., J. Catlin, and E. Rosch. 1976. Relationships among goodness-of-example, category norms and word frequency, Bulletin of the Psychnomic Society 7: 268–84.Find this resource:

Mesoudi, A., A. Whiten, and K. N. Laland. 2006. Towards a unified science of cultural evolution, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29: 329–83.Find this resource:

Mill, J. S. 1843. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive, being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation, London: Parker, Son, and Bourn. Reprinted in J. M. Robson (ed.), intro. by R. F. McRae, Collected works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 7–8, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973–74. German translation: Mill 1877.Find this resource:

Mill, J. S. 1877. System der deductiven und inductiven Logik: eine Darlegung der Principien wissenschaftlicher Forschung, insbesondere der Naturforschung (2 vol.), Braunschweig. German transl. by J. Schiel.Find this resource:

Miller, G. and P. N. Johnson-Laird. 1976. Language and Perception, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Millikan, R. G. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Milner, H. J. 1975. Processes: a mathematical model of computing agents, in H. E. Rose and J. C. Shepherdson (eds), Logic colloquium ’73 (Bristol), no. 80 in Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, Amsterdam: North Holland, 157–73.Find this resource:

Mithen, S. 2005. The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind and Body, London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Find this resource:

Mohanan, T. 1997. Multidimensionality of Representation: NV Complex Predicates in Hindi, in A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, and P. Sells (eds), Complex Predicates, Stanford: CSLI, 431–71.Find this resource:

Monk, J. D. 1976. Mathematical logic, no. 37 in Graduate texts in mathematics, Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

Montague, R. 1960. On the nature of certain philosophical entities, The Monist 53: 159–94. Reprinted in Montague 1974, 148–87.Find this resource:

Montague, R. 1968. Pragmatics. In R. Klibansky (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy: A Survey, Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 102–22, Reprinted in Montague 1974, 95–118. (p. 705) Find this resource:

Montague, R. 1969. On the nature of certain philosophical entities, Monist 53: 159–95. Reprinted in Montague, 1974, 149–87.Find this resource:

Montague, R. 1970a. English as a Formal Language. In B. Visentini (ed.), Linguaggi nella Società a nella Tecnica. Mailand, 189–223. Reprinted in Montague, 1974, 188–221.Find this resource:

Montague, R. 1970b. Universal grammar. Theoria 36: 373–298. Reprinted in Montague, 1974, 222–46.Find this resource:

Montague, R. 1973. The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English. In J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds), Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in Montague 1974, 247–270, and in Portner and Partee 2002, 17–35.Find this resource:

Montague, R. 1974. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, ed. by Richmond H. Thomason.Find this resource:

Moortgat, M. 1993. Generalized quantifiers and discontinuous type constructors. In W. Sijtsma and A. van Horck (eds), Discontinuous Constituency, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Moravcsik, J. M. 1975. Aitia as generative factor in Aristotle’s philosophy, Dialogue, 14: 622–36.Find this resource:

Moravcsik, J. M. 1990. Thought and Language, London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Morgan, J. 1969. On arguing about semantics. Papers in Linguistics 1: 49–70.Find this resource:

Moro, A. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Morrill, G. V. 1994. Type Logical Grammar. Categorial Logic of Signs, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

Moss, H. E., L. K. Tyler, K. A. Dalrymple, and J. A. Hampton. 1997. When do rotten bananas go black? The time course of conceptual combination in noun phrases. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, Oxford.Find this resource:

Müller-Olm, M. 1997. Modular Compiler Verification, no. 1283 in Lecture notes in computer science, Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

Münte, T., K. Schiltz, and M. Kutas. 1998. When temporal terms belie conceptual order, Nature 395: 71–3.Find this resource:

Murphy, G. L. 1988. Comprehending complex concepts, Cognitive Science 12: 529–62.Find this resource:

Murphy, G. L. 1990. Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination, Journal of Memory and Language 29: 259–88.Find this resource:

Murphy, G. L. 2002. The Big Book of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Murphy, G. L. and D. L. Medin. 1985. The role of theories in conceptual coherence, Psychological Review 92: 289–316.Find this resource:

Muskens, R. 1989. A relational reformulation of the theory of types, Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 325–46.Find this resource:

Muskens, R. 1995. Meaning and Partiality. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Find this resource:

Muskens, R. 2001. Lambda Grammars and the syntax–semantics interface. In R. van Rooy and M. Stokhof (eds), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterddam: ILLC/University of Amsterdam, 150–5.Find this resource:

Neale, S. 1995. The Philosophical Significance of Gödel’s Slingshot. Mind 104: 761–825.Find this resource:

Neuholt, E. (ed.). 1978. Formal description of programming language concepts, Proceedings of the IFIP working conference on formal description of programming concepts, St. Andrews, Canada 1977, Amsterdam: North Holland.Find this resource:

Newmeyer, F. J. 1980. Linguistic Theory in America: The First Quarter-Century of Transformational Generative Grammar, New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Newmeyer, F. J. 1996. Generative Linguistics. A historical perspective., London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Nida, E. A. 1951. A system for the description of semantic elements, Word 7: 1–14. (p. 706) Find this resource:

Nieuwland, M. and J. van Berkum. 2005. When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, 1098–111.Find this resource:

Nosofsky, R. M. 1986. Attention, similarity, and the identification–categorization relationship, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115: 39–57.Find this resource:

Nowak, M. A., J. B. Plotkin, and V. A. A. Jansen. 2000. The evolution of syntactic communication, Nature 404: 495–8.Find this resource:

Nunberg, G. 1979. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy, Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 143–84.Find this resource:

Nunberg, G., I. A. Sag, and T. Wasow. 1994. Idioms, Language 70: 491–538.Find this resource:

O’Connor, T. and H. Y. Wong. 2006. Emergent properties. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Find this resource:

O’Grady, W. 2008. The emergentist program, Lingua 118: 447–64.Find this resource:

Oehrle, R. 1976. The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation, Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Find this resource:

Oehrle, R. T. 1988. Multi-dimensional compositional functionsas a basis for grammatical analysis. In E. Bach, R. T. Oehrle, and D. Wheeler (eds), Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures, Dordrecht: Reidel, 349–89.Find this resource:

Okasha, S. 2000. Holism about meaning and about evidence: In defence of W. V. Quine, Erkenntnis 52, 39–61.Find this resource:

Osgood, C., G. Suci, and P. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Find this resource:

Osherson, D. N. 1978. Three conditions on conceptual naturalness, Cognition 6: 263–89.Find this resource:

Osherson, D. N. and E. E. Smith. 1981. On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts, Cognition 9: 35–58.Find this resource:

Osherson, D. N. and E. E. Smith. 1982. Gradedness and conceptual conjunction, Cognition 12: 299–318.Find this resource:

Osherson, D. N. and E. E. Smith. 1997. On typicality and vagueness, Cognition 64: 189–206.Find this resource:

Osterhout, L. and P. Holcomb. 1992. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly, Journal of Memory and Language 31: 785–806.Find this resource:

Ouattara, K., A. Lemasson, and K. Zuberbühler. 2009. Campbell’s Monkeys Use Affixation to Alter Call Meaning. PLoS ONE 4(11): e7808.Find this resource:

Ozyürek, A., R. Willems, S. Kita, and P. Hagoort. 2007. On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 605–16.Find this resource:

Pagin, P. 1997. Is compositionality compatible with holism? Mind and Language 12, 11–33.Find this resource:

Pagin, P. 2003. Communication and strong compositionality, Journal of Philosophical Logic 32: 287–322.Find this resource:

Pagin, P. 2005. Compositionality and context. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 303–48.Find this resource:

Pagin, P. 2006. Meaning holism. In E. Lepore and B. Smith (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–31.Find this resource:

Pagin, P. 2008a. Belief sentences and quotation with generalized compositionality. Presentation at the Logos Seminar, Barcelona.Find this resource:

Pagin, P. 2008b. Compositionality, computability, and complexity. Draft. Earlier version presented at the Compositionality Series of lectures, Rutgers University, 2007.Find this resource:

Pagin, P. and J. Pelletier. 2007. Context, content and composition. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds), Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 25–62. (p. 707) Find this resource:

Pagin, P. and D. Westerståhl. 2010a. Compositionality I: Definitions and Variants, Philosophy Compass 5(3): 250–64.Find this resource:

Pagin, P. and D. Westerståhl. 2010b. Compositionality II: Arguments and Problems, Philosophy Compass 5: 265–82.Find this resource:

Pagin, P. and D. Westerståhl.2010c. Pure quotation and general compositionality, Linguistics and Philosophy 33: 381–415.Find this resource:

Palmer, S. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to phenomenology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Parisien, C. C., H. Anderson, and C. Eliasmith. 2008. Solving the problem of negative synaptic weights in cortical models, Neural Computation 20: 1473–94.Find this resource:

Parsons, T. 1970. Some problems concerning the logic of grammatical modifiers, Synthese 21: 320–34.Find this resource:

Parsons, T. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Partee, B. 1974. Opacity and scope. In M. K. Munitz and P. K. Unger (eds), Semantics and Philosophy, New York: New York University Press, 81–101.Find this resource:

Partee, B. H. 1975. Comments on C. J. Fillmore’s and N. Chomsky’s Papers. In R. Austerlitz (ed.), The Scope of American Linguistics, Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press, 197–209.Find this resource:

Partee, B. H. 1976. Some transformational extensions of Montague Grammar, in B. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar. New York: Academic Press, 51–76.Find this resource:

Partee, B. H. 1984. Compositionality, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds), Varieties of Formal Semantics, no. 3 in GRASS, Dordrecht: Foris, 281–311. Reprinted in Partee 2004, 153–81.Find this resource:

Partee, B. H. 1986. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shiftingrules. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jong, and M. Stokhof (eds), Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quanifiers, Dordrecht: Foris, 115–43.Find this resource:

Partee, B. H. 2004. Compositionality in Formal Semantics. Selected papers by Barbara H. Partee, no. 1 in Explorations in semantics, Malden, USA: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Partee, B. and E. Bach. 1981. Quantification, pronouns, and VP anaphora, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds), Formal Approaches to the Study of Language: Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum, 445–81.Find this resource:

Partee, B. and M. Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity, in R. Bauerle et al. (eds), Meaning, Use, and the Interpretation of Language, Berlin: de Gruyter, 361–83.Find this resource:

Partee, B., A. ter Meulen, and R. Wall. 1990. Mathematical Methods in Linguistics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

Patalano, A. L., S. Chin-Parker, and B. H. Ross. 2006. The importance of being coherent: Category coherence, cross-classification, and reasoning, Journal of Memory and Language 54: 407–24.Find this resource:

Patterson, D. E. 2005. Learnability and compositionality, Mind and Language 20 (3): 326–52.Find this resource:

Patterson, K., M. A. Lambon Ralph, J. R. Hodges, and J. L. McClelland. 2001. Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge, Neuropsychologia 39: 709–24.Find this resource:

Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Santa Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.Find this resource:

Pelletier, F. J. 1994a. The principle of semantic compositionality, Topoi 13, 11–24. Reprinted, with additions, in S. Davis and B. Gillon, Semantics: A Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004, 133–56.Find this resource:

Pelletier, F. J. 1994b. Semantic compositionality: The argument from synonymy. In R. Casati, B. Smith, and G. White (eds), Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences, Vienna: Hölder-PichlerTempsky, 283–95. (p. 708) Find this resource:

Pelletier, F. J. 2000a. Did Frege believe Frege’s principle? Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 10, 87–114. See www.sfu.ca/jeffpell, extended version of Pelletier 2001, last accessed 1 February 2009.Find this resource:

Pelletier, F. J. 2000b. Semantic compositionality: Free algebras and the argument from ambiguity. In M. Feller, S. Kaufmann, and M. Pauly (eds), Formalizing the Dynamics of Information, Stanford: CSLI Press, pp. 207–18.Find this resource:

Pelletier, F. J. 2001. Did Frege believe Frege’s principle?, Journal for Logic, Language and Information 10(1): 87–114.Find this resource:

Pelletier, F. J. 2003. Context-dependence and compositionality, Mind and Language 18: 148–61.Find this resource:

Penke, M. 2006. Flexion im mentalen Lexikon. [Inflectional Morphology in the Mental Lexicon], Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Penke, M. Morphology and language disorder. In M. Ball, M. Perkins, N. Mueller, and S. Howard (eds), The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics, Oxford: Blackwell, 212–27.Find this resource:

Penke, M. and M. Krause. 2004. Regular and irregular inflectional morphology in German Williams syndrome. In S. Bartke, and J. Siegmüller (eds), Williams Syndrome across Languages, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 245–70.Find this resource:

Penke, M. and A. Rosenbach. 2007. What counts as evidence in linguistics? An Introduction. In M. Penke, and A. Rosenbach (eds), What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics—the Case of Innateness, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–50.Find this resource:

Penke, M. and G. Westermann. 2006. Broca’s area and inflectional morphology: Evidence from Broca’s aphasia and computer modeling, Cortex 42: 563–76.Find this resource:

Penke, M., U. Janssen, and M. Krause. 1999. The representation of inflectional morphology: evidence from Broca’s aphasia, Brain and Language 68: 225–32.Find this resource:

Perry, J. 1986. Thought without representation, Supplementary Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 60: 137–52, Reprinted in Perry, The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 205–18.Find this resource:

Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Petersen, W. 2007. Decomposing concepts with frames, in J. Skilters, F. Toccafondi, and G. Stemberger (eds), Complex Cognition and Qualitative Science. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, University of Latvia. Vol. 2, 151–70.Find this resource:

Petersen, W. and M. Werning. 2007. Conceptual fingerprints: Lexical decomposition by means of frames—a neuro-cognitive model. In U. Priss, S. Polovina, and R. Hill (eds), Conceptual Structures: Knowledge architectures for smart applications LNAI 4604, Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag, 415–28.Find this resource:

Pfeifer, N., and G. D. Kleiter. 2005. Coherence and non-monotonicity in human reasoning, Synthese 146 (1–2): 93–109.Find this resource:

Pfeifer, N. and G. D. Kleiter. 2008. The conditional in mental probability logic, to appear in: M Oaksford (ed.), The Psychology of Conditionals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 153–73.Find this resource:

Phillips, D. 1976. Holistic Thought in Social Science, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Philosophical Perspectives. 2008. Special issue: Philosophy of Language, vol. 22.Find this resource:

Piaget, J. 1980. The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), On Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 23–34.Find this resource:

Pierce, B. 2002. Types and Programming Languages, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Pietroski, P. 1998. Actions, adjuncts, and agency, Mind 107: 73–111. (p. 709) Find this resource:

Pietroski, P. 2002. Events and Semantic Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press (2nd edition 2005).Find this resource:

Pietroski, P. 2003. Small verbs, complex events. In L. Antony and H. Hornstein (eds), Chomsky and His Critics, New York: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Pietroski, P. 2005. Events and their Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Pietroski, P. 2006a. Interpreting concatenation and concatenates, Philosophical Issues 16: 221–45.Find this resource:

Pietroski, P. 2006b. Induction and comparison, Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 15: 157–90.Find this resource:

Pietroski, P. 2011. Minimal semantic instructions. In C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Lingustic Minimalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 472–98.Find this resource:

Pietroski, P. Forthcoming. Lexicalizing and combining.Find this resource:

Piñango, M., E. Zurif, and R. Jackendoff. 1999. Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax–semantics interface, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 395–414.Find this resource:

Piñango, M., A. Winnick, R. Ullah, and E. Zurif. 2006. The time course of semantic composition: The case of aspectual coercion, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35: 233–44.Find this resource:

Pinker, S. 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language, New York: William Morrow and Company.Find this resource:

Pinker, S. 1997. Words and rules in the human brain, Nature 387: 547–8.Find this resource:

Pinker, S. 1999. Words and Rules, New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Pinker, S. 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, New York: Viking.Find this resource:

Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(4): 707–84.Find this resource:

Pinker, S. and J. Mehler (eds). 1989. Connections and Symbols, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Pinker, S. and A. Prince. 1988. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition, Cognition 28: 73–193.Find this resource:

Plate, T. 1995. Holographic reduced representations, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 63: 623–41.Find this resource:

Plate, T. 2003. Holographic Reduced Representations, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication.Find this resource:

Plaut, D. C. and L. G. Gonnerman. 2000. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 445–85.Find this resource:

Polanyi, L. 1985. A theory of discourse structure and discourse coherence. In W. H. Eilfort, P. D. Kroeberger, and K. L. Peterson (eds), Papers from the General Session at the TwentyFirst Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Find this resource:

Pollack, J. 1990. Recursive distributed representations, Artificial Intelligence 46: 77–105.Find this resource:

Pollard, C. 1984. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, Head Grammars, and Natural Langugage. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Pollock, J. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Find this resource:

Portner, P. and Partee, B. (eds). 2002. Formal Semantics: the essential readings, Oxford: Blackwell. (p. 710) Find this resource:

Posner, M. I. and S. W. Keele. 1968. On the genesis of abstract ideas, Journal of Experimental Psychology 77: 353–363.Find this resource:

Pothos, E. M. 2005. The rules versus similarity distinction, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 1–49.Find this resource:

Potts, C. 2007. The dimensions of quotation. In C. Barker and P. Jacobson (eds), Direct Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 405–31.Find this resource:

Prasada, S. and S. Pinker. 1993. Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns, Language and Cognitive Processes 8: 1–51.Find this resource:

Pratt, V. R. 1979. Dynamic logic, in J. W. de Bakker and J. van Leeuwen (eds), Foundations of computer science III, part 2, Languages, logic, semantics, no. 100 in CWI Tracts, Amsterdam: Centre for Mathematics and Computer science, 53–82.Find this resource:

Prinz, J. J. 2002. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Prosoporov, O. 2005. Compositionality and contextuality as adjoint principles, in E. Machery, M. Werning and G. Schurz (eds), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content. Vol. II Applications to linguistics, psychology and neuroscience, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 149–75.Find this resource:

Pullum, G. and B. Scholz. 2007. Systematicity and natural language syntax, Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7, 375–402.Find this resource:

Pullum, G. K. and B. C. Scholz. 2002. Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments, The Linguistic Review 19: 9–50.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, F. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 67. 576–82.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, J. 1991a. The generative lexicon, Computational Linguistics 17: 409–41.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, J. 1991b. The syntax of event structure, Cognition 41: 47–81.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, J. 2011. The ultiplicity of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, J. and E. Jezek. 2008. Semantic coercion in language: Beyond distributional analysis, Italian Journal of Linguistics 20(1): 181–214.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, J. and A. Rumshisky. 2008. Between chaos and structure: Interpreting lexical data through a theoretical lens, International Journal of Lexicography 21(3): 337–55.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, J. and A. Rumshisky. 2010. Mechanisms of sense extensions in verbs, in G.-M. de Schry ver (ed.) A Way with Words: Recent Advances in Lexical Theory and Analysis. A Festscrhift for Patrick Hanks, Gent, Kampala: Menha Publishers.Find this resource:

Putnam, H. 1954. Synonymity, and the analysis of belief sentences, Analysis 14: 114–22.Find this resource:

Pylkkäen, L., R. Llinas, and B. McElree. 2007. An MEG study of silent meaning, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19(11): 1905–21.Find this resource:

Qu, Wei and Ming an Han. 2004. Dictionary of Contemporary Chinese New Words, Beijing: China Encyclopedia Publishing House.Find this resource:

Quartz, S. R. and T. J. Sejnowski. 1997. The neural basis of cognitive development:a constructivist manifesto, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 537–96.Find this resource:

Quine, W. V. O. 1951. Two dogmas of empiricism, Philosophical Review 60, 20–43.Find this resource:

Quine, W. V. O. 1956. Quantifiers and propositional attitudes, Journal of Philosophy 53: 177–87.Find this resource:

Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Quine, W. V. O. 1963. On what there is. In From a Logical Point of View, New York: Harper and Row.Find this resource:

Ramchand, G. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A first phase syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (p. 711) Find this resource:

Ranta, A. 1994. Type-Theoretical Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Rapp, I. and A. von Stechow. 1999 Fast ‘almost’ and functional heads, Journal of Semantics 16: 149–204.Find this resource:

Rappaport Hovav, M. and B. Levin. 2008. The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity, Journal of Linguistics 44: 129–67.Find this resource:

Recanati, F. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Recanati, F. 2007. Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Recanati, F. 2011. Compositionality, flexibility, and context-dependence. In this volume.Find this resource:

Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic, London: Macmillan.Find this resource:

Reiter, R. 1980. A logic for default reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13: 81–132.Find this resource:

Reiter, R. 1987. Non-monotonic reasoning, Annual Review of Computer Science 2: 147–86.Find this resource:

Rescher, N. (ed.) 1967. The Logic of Decision and Action, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Resnik, M. D. 1967. The context principle in Frege’s philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27: 356–65.Find this resource:

Resnik, M. D. 1976. Frege’s context principle revisited, in M. Schirn (ed.), Studien zu Frege III: Logik und Semantik, Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 35–49.Find this resource:

Resnik, M. D. 1979. Frege as idealist and then realist, Inquiry 22: 350–7.Find this resource:

Rey, G. 1983. Concepts and stereotypes, Cognition 15, 237–62.Find this resource:

Richards, N. 2001. An idiomatic argument for lexical decomposition, Linguistic Inquiry 321: 183–92.Find this resource:

Ridley, M. 1993. Evolution, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Find this resource:

Riehle, A., S. Grün, and A. Aertsen. 1997. Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical functions, Science 278: 1950–3.Find this resource:

Rieke, F., D. Warland, R. de Ruyter van Steveninick, and W. Bialek. 1997. Spikes: Exploring the neural code, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Rips, L. J. 1975. Inductive judgements about natural categories, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 665–81.Find this resource:

Rips, L. J. 1989. Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Rips, L. J. 1995. The current status of research on conceptual combination. Mind and Language 10: 72–104.Find this resource:

Rips, L. J., F. J. Shoben, and E. F. Smith. 1973. Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, 1–20.Find this resource:

Robbins, P. S. 2002. How to blunt the sword of compositionality, Noûs 36: 313–34.Find this resource:

Robbins, P. 2005. The myth of reverse compositionality, Philosophical Studies 125: 251–75.Find this resource:

Robbins, P. 2007. Minimalism and modularity. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds), ContextSensitivity and Semantic Minimalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Roelfsema, P. R., A. K. Engel, P. König, and W. Singer. 1997. Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas, Nature 385, 157–61.Find this resource:

Rooth, M. 1985. Association with focus. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Find this resource:

Rosch, E. R. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Rosch, E. R. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104: 192–232. (p. 712) Find this resource:

Rosch, E. R. 1978. Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Rosch, E. R. and C. B. Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories, Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605.Find this resource:

Rosch, E. R., C. Simpson, and R. S. Miller. 1976a. Structural bases of typicality effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2: 491–502.Find this resource:

Rosch, E., C. B. Mervis, W. D. Gray, D. M. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Bream. 1976b. Basic objects in natural categories, Cognitive Psychology 8: 382–429.Find this resource:

Rosen, C. 1997. Auxiliation and serialization: On discerning the difference. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, and P. Sells (eds), Complex Predicates, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 175–202.Find this resource:

Rosier-Catach, I. 1999. La notion de translation, le principe de compositonalité et l’analyse de la prédiction aceidentelle chez Abélard, in J. Biard (ed.), Langage, Sciences, Philosophie au XIIe siècle, Paris: Vrin, 125–64.Find this resource:

Ross, J. R. 1969. Auxiliaries as main verbs, in W. Todd (ed.), Studies in Philosophical Linguistics (Series 1), Evanston, Ill: Great Expectations Press.Find this resource:

Ross, J. R. 1972. Act. In D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds), Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht: Reidel, 70–126.Find this resource:

Ross, J. R. 1976. To have have and to not have have, in M. A. Jazayery, E. C. Polomé and W. Winter (eds), Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill I, The Hague: Mouton, 263–70.Find this resource:

Rott, H. 2000. Fregean elucidations, Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 621–41.Find this resource:

Rumelhart, D. 1979. Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2nd edn, 1993), 71–82.Find this resource:

Rumelhart, D. E. and J. L. McClelland. 1986a. PDP models and general issues in cognitive science, in D. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, and PDP Research Group (eds), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Rumelhart, D. E. and J. L. McClelland. 1986b. On learning the past tenses of English verbs, in D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group (eds), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and Biological Models, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 216–71.Find this resource:

Rumelhart, D. E., G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams. 1986a. Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group, Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 1 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 318–62.Find this resource:

Rumelhart, D. E., J. L. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group (eds). 1986b. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vols 1 and 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Russell, B. 1905. On denoting, Mind, 14. Reprinted in A. P. Martinich (ed.), The Philosophy of Language 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 212–20.Find this resource:

Russell, B. 1918. Lectures on logical atomism. In R. Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, London: Allen & Unwin. Marsh collection published 1956; page references to those in Marsh.Find this resource:

Russell, B. 2006. Against grammatical computation of scalar implicatrues, Journal of Semantics 23: 361–82.Find this resource:

Ryle, G. 1957. The theory of meaning, in C. A. Mace (ed.), British Philosophy in the Mid-century, Allen & Unwin, 239–64.Find this resource:

Sabo, W. D. and J. J. Prinz, in progress. When are prototypes compositional? University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. (p. 713) Find this resource:

Saffran, J. R. R. N. Aslin, and E. L. Newport. 1996. Statistical learning by eight-month-old infants, Science 274: 1926–8.Find this resource:

Sag, I. 1976. Deletion and Logical Form. PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambrdige, MA.Find this resource:

Sag, I. 1981. Formal semantics and extralinguistic context. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 273–94.Find this resource:

Salari, N. and A. Maye. 2008. Brain Waves: How synchronized neuronal oscillations can explain the perception of illusory objects, Hamburg: VDM Verlag.Find this resource:

Salinas, E. and T. J. Sejnowski. 2001. Correlated neuronal activity and the flow of neural information, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 529–50.Find this resource:

Sandu, G. and J. Hintikka. 2001. Aspects of compositionality, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10: 49–61.Find this resource:

Sanford, A. 2002. Context, attention and depth of processing during interpretation, Mind and Language 17: 188–206.Find this resource:

Sanford, A. and P. Sturt. 2002. Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6, 382–6.Find this resource:

Saussure, F. de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Translated by Roy Harris as F. de Saussure: Course in General Linguistics, Chicago: Open Court, 1986. Page references to this translation.Find this resource:

Schank, R. C. 1972. Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding, Cognitive Psychology 3, 532–631.Find this resource:

Schein, B. 1993. Plurals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Schein, B. 2001. Adverbial, descriptive reciprocals. In R. Hastings et al., Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XI, Ithaca: CLC Publications.Find this resource:

Schein, B. Forthcoming. Conjunction Reduction Redux, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Schiffer, S. R. 1987. The Remnants of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Find this resource:

Schiffer, S. R. 2003. The Things we Mean, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Schillen, T. B. and P. König. 1991. Stimulus-dependent assembly formation of oscillatory responses: II. Desynchronization, Neural Computation 3: 167–78.Find this resource:

Schillen, T. B. and P. König. 1994. Binding by temporal structure in multiple feature domains of an oscillatory neuronal network, Biological Cybernetics 70, 397–405.Find this resource:

Schlenker, P. 2003. A plea for monsters, Linguistics and Philosophy, 26: 29–120.Find this resource:

Schlick, M. 1918. General Theory of Knowledge, New York: Springer-Verlag. Translated by A. E. Blumberg; published 1974.Find this resource:

Scholl, B. and P. Tremoulet. 2000. Perceptual causality and animacy, Trends in Cognitive Science 4: 299–309.Find this resource:

Scholz, B. C. and G. K. Pullum. 2002. Searching for arguments to support linguistic nativism, The Linguistic Review 19: 185–223.Find this resource:

Scholz, O. R. 1999. Verstehen un Rationalität. Untersuchungen zu den Grundlagen von Hermeneutik und Sprachphilosophie, no. 76 in Philosophische Abhandlungen, Frankfurt am Main, Klostermann.Find this resource:

Scholz, O. R. 2001a. Jenseits der Legende—Auf Suche nach den genuinen Leistungen Schleiermachers für die allgemeine Hermeneutik, in J. Schröder (ed.), Theorie der Interpretation van Humanismus bis zur Romantik—Rechtswissenschaft, Pilosophie, Theologie, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 168–88.Find this resource:

Scholz, O. R. 2001b. Wittgensteins Holismen: Sätze, Sprachspiele, Lebensformen, in U. Meixner and A. Newen (eds), Grundlagen der analytische Philosophy, Vol. 4 of Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse/Logical analysis and history of philosophy, Paderborn: Mentis, 173–88. (p. 714) Find this resource:

Schreuder, R. and H. Baayen. 1995. Modeling morphological processing, in L. B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 131–54.Find this resource:

Schubert, L. 2000. The situations we talk about. In J. Minker (ed.), Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 407–39.Find this resource:

Schütte, K. 1977. Proof Theory, no. 225 in Grundlehren der mathematische wissenschaften, Berlin: Springer.Find this resource:

Schurz, G. 1998. Probabilistic semantics for Delgrande’s Conditional Logic, Artificial Intelligence 102: 81–95.Find this resource:

Schurz, G. 2001a. What is normal? An evolution-theoretic foundation of normic laws and their relation to statistical normality, Philosophy of Science 28: 476–97.Find this resource:

Schurz, G. 2001b. Kinds of rationality and their role in evolution. In B. B. Brogaard and B. Smith (eds), Rationality and Irrationality, Vienna: öbv and hpt, 301–10.Find this resource:

Schurz, G. 2002. Ceteris paribuslaws: Classification anddeconstruction,Erkenntnis 57: 351–72.Find this resource:

Schurz, G. 2004. Normic laws, nonmonotonic reasoning, and the unity of science. In S. Rahman (eds), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, Kluwer: Dordrecht, 181–211.Find this resource:

Schurz, G. 2005a. Non-monotonic reasoning from an evolutionary viewpoint: Ontic, logical and cognitive foundations, Synthese 146: 37–51.Find this resource:

Schurz, G. 2005b. Semantic holism and (non-)compositionality in scientific theories. In M. Werning, E. Machery, and G. Schurz (eds), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content. Vol. 1: Foundational Issues, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 271–84.Find this resource:

Schurz, G. 2007. Human conditional reasoning explained by non-monotonicity and probability: An evolutionary account. In S. Vosniadou et al. (eds), Proceedings of EuroCogSci07. The European Cognitive Science Conference 2007, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 628–33.Find this resource:

Schuster, H. G. and P. Wagner. 1990. A model for neuronal oscillations in the visual cortex, Biological Cybernetics 64: 77–82.Find this resource:

Schwarz, B. 2006. Attributive wrong. In D. Baumer et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA, 362–70. http://www.lingref.com/ cpp/wccfl/25/paper1469.pdf.Find this resource:

Scott, D. 1970. Advice on modal logic. In Karel Lambert (ed.), Philosophical Problems in Logic, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 143–73.Find this resource:

Scriven, M. 1959. Truisms as grounds for historical explanations. In P. Gardiner (ed.), Theories of History, New York: The Free Press.Find this resource:

Searle, J. 1980. The background of meaning. In J. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch (eds), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, Dordrecht: Reidel, 221–32.Find this resource:

Searle, J. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Sedivy, J., M. Tanenhaus, C. Chambers, and G. Carlson. 1999. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation, Cognition 71: 109–47.Find this resource:

Sedlak, P. A. S. 1975. Direct/indirect object word order: a cross-linguistic analysis, Working Papers on Language Universals 18: 117–64. Stanford University.Find this resource:

Segal, G. 2001. Two theories of names, Mind and Language 5: 547–63.Find this resource:

Segerberg, K. 1973. Two-dimensional modal logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2: 77–96.Find this resource:

Seidenberg, M. S. 1994. Language and connectionism: The developing interface, Cognition 50: 385–401Find this resource:

Seidenberg, M. S. and M. C. MacDonald. 1999. A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing, Cognitive Science 23: 569–88. (p. 715) Find this resource:

Sekular R. and D. Nash. 1972. Speed of size scaling in human vision, Psychonomic Science 27: 93–4.Find this resource:

Selten, R. and M. Warglien. 2007. The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 7361–6.Find this resource:

Senkowski, D., T. R. Schneider, J. J. Foxe, and A. K. Engel. 2008. Crossmodal binding through neural coherence: implications for multisensory processing, Trends in Neurosciences 31, 401–9.Find this resource:

Shaffir, E., E. E. Smith, and D. N. Osherson. 1990. Typicality and reasoning fallacies, Memory and Cognition 18: 229–39.Find this resource:

Shan, Chung-chieh. 2005. Linguistic side efects, Dissertation, Harvard University.Find this resource:

Shannon, C. E. 1949. themathematical theory of communication. In C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver (eds), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, The University of Illinois Press.Find this resource:

Shastri, L. and V. Ajjanagadde. 1993. From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 417–49.Find this resource:

Shepard, R. N. and J. Metzler. 1971. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, Science 171: 701–3.Find this resource:

Shieber, S., 1985. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language, Lingusitics and Philosophy 8: 333–43.Find this resource:

Shmuel, A. and A. Grinvald. 2000. Coexistence of linear zones and pinwheels within orientation maps in cat visual cortex, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97: 5568–73.Find this resource:

Siegel, M., T. H. Donner, R. Oostenveld, P. Fries, and A. K. Engel. 2008. Neuronal synchronization along the dorsal visual pathway reflects the focus of spatial attention, Neuron 60: 709–19.Find this resource:

Singer, W. 1994. Time as coding space in neocortical processing. In R. Buzsaki, W. Singer, A. Berthoz, and Y. Christen (eds), Temporal Coding in the Brain, New York: Springer Verlag, 51–79.Find this resource:

Singer, W. 1999. Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 24: 49–65.Find this resource:

Singh, R. and C. Eliasmith. 2006. Higher-dimensional neurons explain the tuning and dynamics of working memory cells, Journal of Neuroscience 26: 3667–78.Find this resource:

Sinha, A. K. 2002. Prototype theory and the conceptualisation of culture, Psychology and Developing Societies 14 (1): 45–54.Find this resource:

Skinner, B. F. 1957. Verbal Behavior, Acton: Copley Publishing Group.Find this resource:

Slobin, D. I. 1977. Language change in childhood and history. In J. Macnamara (ed.), Language Learning and Thought, London: Academic Press, 185–221.Find this resource:

Sloman, S. A. 1993. Feature-based induction, Cognitive Psychology 25: 231–80.Find this resource:

Sluga, H. D. 1971. Review of Frege’s Nachgelassene Schriften, The Journal of Philosophy 68: 265–72.Find this resource:

Sluga, H. D. 1975. Frege and the rise of analytic philosophy, Inquiry 18: 471–98. Review discussion of Bynum (1972) and Dummett (1973).Find this resource:

Sluga, H. D. 1977. Frege’s alleged realism, Inquiry 20: 227–42.Find this resource:

Sluga, H. D. 1980. Gottlob Frege, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Find this resource:

Smith, A. D. M. 2008. Protolanguage reconstructed. Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 9 (1): 100–16.Find this resource:

Smith, E. E. and D. L. Medin. 1981. Categories and Concepts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (p. 716) Find this resource:

Smith, E. E. and D. N. Osherson. 1984. Conceptual combination with prototype concepts, Cognitive Science 8: 337–61.Find this resource:

Smith, E. E., E. Shoben, and L. Rips. 1974. Structure and process in semantic memory:a featural model for semantic decisions, Psychological Review 81: 214–41.Find this resource:

Smith, E. E., D. L. Medin, L. J. Rips, and M. Keane. 1988a. Combining prototypes: A selective modification model, Cognitive Science 12: 485–527.Find this resource:

Smith, E. E., D. N. Osherson, L. J. Rips, and M. Keane. 1988b. Combining concepts:A selective modification model, Cognitive Science 12, 485–527.Find this resource:

Smith, K. 2003. The Transmission of Language: Models of biological and cultural evolution, PhD Thesis, The University of Edinburgh.Find this resource:

Smith, K., H. Brighton, and S. Kirby. 2003. Complex systems in language evolution: the cultural emergence of compositional structure, Advances in Complex Systems 6: 537–58.Find this resource:

Smits, T., G. Storms, Y. Rosseel, and P. De Boeck. 2002. Fruits and vegetables categorized: An application of the generalized context model, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 836–44.Find this resource:

Smolensky, P. 1988a. On the proper treatment of connectionism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11: 1–74.Find this resource:

Smolensky, P. 1988b. The constituent structure of connectionist mental states: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn, Southern Journal of Philosophy 26: Supplement: Spindel Conference 1987: Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind, 137–61. Reprinted in T. Horgan and J. Tienson (eds), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.Find this resource:

Smolensky, P. 1990. Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems, Artificial Intelligence 46: 159–216. Reprinted in G. Hinton (ed.), Connectionist Symbol Processing, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.Find this resource:

Smolensky, P. 1995a. Connectionism, constituency and the language of thought. In C. Macdonald and G. Macdonald (eds), Connectionism Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 164–98. Original work published 1991.Find this resource:

Smolensky, P. 1995b. Reply: Constituent structure and explanation in an integrated connectionist/symbolic cognitive architecture. In C. Macdonald and G. Macdonald (eds.), Connectionism, Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell, 223–90.Find this resource:

Smuts, J. 1926. Holism and Evolution, London: Macmillan.Find this resource:

Solomon, K. O. and L. W. Barsalou. 2004. Perceptual simulation in property verification, Memory and Cognition 32: 244–59.Find this resource:

Song, S., P. J. Sjostrom, M. Reigl, S. Nelson, and D. B. Chklovskii. 2005. Highly nonrandom features of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits, PLoS Biology, 33.Find this resource:

Sonnenstuhl, I., S. Eisenbeiss, and H. Clahsen, 1999. Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon, Cognition 72: 203–36.Find this resource:

Spelke, E. 1990. Principles of object perception, Cognitive Science 14: 29–56.Find this resource:

Spelke, E. 2002. Developing knowledge of space: Core systems and new combinations. In S. Kosslyn and A. Galaburda (eds), Languages of the Brain, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Spijkerman, R. and R. J. J. M. van den Eijnden. Addiction Research Institute, Rotterdam, S. Vitale, and R. C. M. E. Engels. 2004. Explaining adolescents smoking and drinking behavior: The concept of smoker and drinker prototypes in relation to variables of the theory of planned behavior, Addictive Behaviors 29 (8): 1615–22.Find this resource:

Springer, K. and G. L. Murphy. 1992. Feature availability in conceptual combination, Psychological Science 3: 111–17. (p. 717) Find this resource:

Stalnaker, C. R. 1970. Pragmatics, Synthese 22: 272–89, reprinted in C. R. Stalnaker Context and Content, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Find this resource:

Stalnaker, C. R. 1978. Assertion. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 315–32.Find this resource:

Stalnaker, C. R. 1999. Context and Content, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Stanley, J. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Stanley, J. and Z. G. Szabó. 2000. On quantifier domain restriction, Mind and Language 15: 219–61.Find this resource:

Stechow, A. von. 1995. Lexical decomposition in syntax, in U. Egli, P. E. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. v. Stechow, and G. Wienold (eds), Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 81–118.Find this resource:

Stechow, A. von. 1996. The different readings of wieder ‘again’: A structural account, Journal of Semantics 13: 87–138.Find this resource:

Stechow, A. von. 2003. How are results represented and modified? Remarks on Jäger & Blutner’s anti-decomposition, in E. Lang et al. (eds), Modifying Adjuncts, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 417–51.Find this resource:

Stechow, A. von and T. E. Zimmermann. 1984. Term answers and contextual change, Linguistics 22: 3–40.Find this resource:

Steedman, M. 1987. Combinatory Grammars and Parasitic Gaps, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 403–39.Find this resource:

Steedman, M. 1990. Gapping as constituent coordination, Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 207–63.Find this resource:

Steedman, M. 1997. The productions of time. Draft, ftp://ftp.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/pub/steedman/ temporality/temporality.ps.gz, July 2000. Subsumes Temporality, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds), Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland, 895–935.Find this resource:

Steinmetz, P. N., A. Roy, P. J. Fitzgerald, S. S. Hsiao, K. O. Johnson, and E. Niebur. 2000. Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing in primate somatosensory cortex, Nature 404: 187–90.Find this resource:

Stewart, O. T. 2001. The Serial Verb Construction Parameter, New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Stewart, T. C. and C. Eliasmith. 2008. Building production systems with realistic spiking neurons. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, and V. M. Sloutsky (eds), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 1759–64.Find this resource:

Stiebels, B. 1996. Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Find this resource:

Stiebels, B. 1998. Complex denominal verbs in German and the morphology-semantics interface. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1997, Dordrecht: Kluwer. 265–302.Find this resource:

Stiebels, B. 2002. Typologie des Argumentlinkings: Ökonomie und Expressivität [Typology of Argument Linking: Economy and Expressivity]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Find this resource:

Stigler, S. M. 1980. Stigler’s law of eponymy. In T. F. Gieryn (ed.), Science and social structure: a festchrift for Robert K. Merton, New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 147–57.Find this resource:

Stokoe, W. C. 2001. Language in Hand: Why Sign Came Before Speech, Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Find this resource:

Storms, G., P. De Boeck, I. van Mechelen, and W. Ruts. 1996. The dominance effect in concept conjunctions: Generality and interaction aspects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 1–15. (p. 718) Find this resource:

Storms, G., P. De Boeck, I. van Mechelen, and W. Ruts. 1998a. Not guppies, nor goldfish, but tumble dryers, Noriega, Jesse Jackson, panties, car crashes, bird books, and Stevie Wonder, Memory and Cognition 26: 143–45.Find this resource:

Storms, G., W. Ruts, and A. Vandenbroucke. 1998b. Dominance, overextensions, and the conjunction effect in different syntactic phrasings of concept conjunctions, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 10: 337–72.Find this resource:

Storms, G., P. de Boeck, J. A. Hampton, and I. van Mechelen. 1999. Predicting conjunction typicalities by component typicalities, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6: 677–84.Find this resource:

Storms, G., P. De Boeck, and W. Ruts. 2000. Prototype and exemplar based information in natural language categories, Journal of Memory and Language 42: 51–73.Find this resource:

Sundholm, G. 1986. Proof theory and meaning. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 3, Dordrecht: Reidel, 471–506.Find this resource:

Swinney, D., T. Love, M. Walenski, and E. Smith. 2007. Conceptual combination during sentence comprehension, Psychological Science, 18: 397–400.Find this resource:

Synthese. 2009. Special issue: Relative Truth, vol. 166(2).Find this resource:

Szabó, Z. G. 2000a. Problems of Compositionality. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Szabó, Z. G. 2000b. Compositionality as supervenience, Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 475–505.Find this resource:

Szabó, Z. G. 2003. Believing in things, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 584–611.Find this resource:

Szabó, Z. G. 2004. Review of J. Fodor and E. Lepore The Compositionality Papers, Mind 113: 340–4.Find this resource:

Szabó, Z. G. 2007. Compositionality. Stanford Enclyclopedia of Philosophy.Find this resource:

Tabossi, P. 1988. Effects of context on immediate interpretation of unambiguous nouns, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 153–62.Find this resource:

Tallerman, M. 2006. A holistic protolanguage cannot be stored, cannot be retrieved. In: A. Cangelosi, A. D. M. Smith, and K. Smith (eds), The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference (EVOLANG6), World Scientific, 447–8.Find this resource:

Tallerman, M. 2007. Did our ancestors speak a holistic protolanguage? Lingua 117: 579–604.Find this resource:

Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 136–49.Find this resource:

Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition, Cognitive Science 12: 49–100.Find this resource:

Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vols. I and II, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Tarski, A. 1931. Sur les ensembles définissables de nombres réels. I, Fundamenta Mathematicae 17: 210–39.Find this resource:

Tarski, A. 1933. Pojcie prawdy w jezykach nauk dedukcyjnych, Prace Towarzystwa naukowego Warszawsiego. Wydzial III, 34. German translation with added postscript: Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen, Studia Philosophica 1: 261–405, 1935. English translation of the German text: The concept of truth in formalized languages, in: J. Woodger (ed.) Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956; revised second edition, J. Corcoran (ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983, 152–278.Find this resource:

Tarski, A. 1983. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: papers from 1923 to 1938, ed. J. Corcoran, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Find this resource:

Taylor, B. 1985. Modes of Occurrence, Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Taylor, J. R. 2003. Linguistic Categorization 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Taylor, S.E. 1989. Positive Illusions, New York: Basic Books Inc. (p. 719) Find this resource:

Tenny, C. 1992. The aspectual interface hypothesis. In I. A. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds), Lexical Matters, Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1–27.Find this resource:

Tenny, C. and J. Pustejovsky. 2000. Events as Grammatical Objects, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Termann, D. and D. Wang. 1995. Global competition and local cooperation in a network of neural oscillators, Physica D 81: 148–76.Find this resource:

Thagard, P. 1983. Conceptual combination: a frame-based theory, Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology, Wellesley, June.Find this resource:

Thomason, R. 1974. Introduction in R. Montague 1974, 1–69.Find this resource:

Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Travis, L. 2000. Event structure in syntax. In C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky (eds), Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 145–85.Find this resource:

Traxler, M., M. Pickering, and B. McElree. 2002. Coercion in sentence processing: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading, Journal of Memory and Language 47, 530–47.Find this resource:

Traxler, M., B. McElree, R. Williams, and M. Pickering. 2005. Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements, Journal of Memory and Language 53, 1–25.Find this resource:

Treisman, A. 1996. The binding problem, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6: 171–8.Find this resource:

Trendelenburg, A. 1840. Logische Untersuchungen, Berlin: Bethge,.Find this resource:

Troelstra, A. S. and H. Schwichtenberg. 2000. Basic Proof Theory, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Tsujimura, N. 2001. Degree words and scalar structure in Japanese, Lingua 111: 29–52.Find this resource:

Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1983. Extensional versus intuitive resoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement, Psychological Review 90: 293–315.Find this resource:

Ullman, M. T., S. Corkin, M. Coppola, G. Hickok, J. Growdon, W. Koroshetz, and S. Pinker. 1997. A neural dissociation within language: evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9: 266–76.Find this resource:

Uriagereka, J. 1995. Warps. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics.Find this resource:

Uriagereka, J. 2002. Derivations, London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Uriagereka, J. 2008. Syntactic Anchors, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

van Benthem, J. 1986. The Logic of Semantics, in Essays on Logical Semantics, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 198–214.Find this resource:

van Benthem, J. 1995. Language in Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

van Benthem, J. and A. ter Meulen. 1997. Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam: Elsevier and Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

van Berkum, J. 2004. Sentence comprehension in a wider discourse: Can we use ERPs to keep track of things? In M. Carreiras and C. Clifton (eds), The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, Erps and Beyond, New York: Psychology Press, 229–70.Find this resource:

van Berkum, J., P. Hagoort, and C. Brown. 1999. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11: 657–71.Find this resource:

van Berkum, J., P. Zwitserlood, P. Hagoort, and C. Brown. 2003. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect, Cognitive Brain Research 17: 701–18.Find this resource:

van der Lely, H. and M. T. Ullman. 2001. Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children, Language and Cognitive Processes 16: 177–217. (p. 720) Find this resource:

van der Pol, B. 1926. On ‘relaxation-oscillations’, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science Series 7 (2): 978–92.Find this resource:

van der Sandt, R. A. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution, Journal of Semantics 9(4): 333–77.Find this resource:

van der Velde, F. and M. de Kamps. 2006. Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 37–70.Find this resource:

van Eijck, J. and H. Kamp. 1997. Representing discourse in context, in van Benthem and ter Meulen 1997, 179–237.Find this resource:

van Lambalgen, M. and F. Hamm. 2004. The Proper Treatment of Events, Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

van Oostendorp, H. and S. de Mul. 1990. Moses beats Adam: A semantic relatedness effect on a semantic illusion, Acta Psychologica 74: 35–46.Find this resource:

van Vreeswijk, C. and H. Sompolinsky. 1996. Chaos in neuronal networks with balanced excitatory and inhibitory activity, Science 274, 1724–6.Find this resource:

Vendler, Z. 1967. Verbs and times, in Z. Vendler, Linguistics in Philosophy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 97–121.Find this resource:

Vijay-Shanker, K., D. Wier and A. Joshi. 1986. Adjoining, wrapping, and headed strings, in Proceedings of the 24th Meeting of the Association for Computaitonal Linguistics, New York: ACL.Find this resource:

Vogt, P. 2005. The emergence of compositional structures in perceptually grounded language games, Artificial Intelligence 167: 206–42.Find this resource:

von der Malsburg, C. 1981. The correlation theory of brain function, Internal Report 81–2, MaxPlanck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen.Find this resource:

von der Malsburg, C. 1987. Synaptic plasticity as basis of brain organization. In J. Changeux and M. Konishi (eds), The Neural and Molecular Bases of Learning, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 411–31.Find this resource:

von Frisch, K. 1974. Decoding the language of the bee, Science 185: 663–8.Find this resource:

von Stein, A., C. Chiang, and P. König, 2000. Top-down processing mediated by interareal synchronization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 9726: 14748–53.Find this resource:

Wachbroit, R. 1994. Normality as a Biological Concept, Philosophy of Science 61: 579–91.Find this resource:

Walsh, S. P. and K. M. White. 2007. Me, my mobile, and I: The role of selfand prototypical identity influences in the prediction of mobile phone behavior, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 37 (10), 2405–34.Find this resource:

Wang, D. 1996. Primitive auditory segregation based on oscillatory correlation, Cognitive Science 20: 409–56.Find this resource:

Wanner, E. 1979. False identification of prime numbers. Paper presented at the 1979 meeting of The Society for Philosophy and Psychology, New York.Find this resource:

Washio, R. 1997. Resultatives, compositionality and language variation, East Asian Journal of Linguistics 6: 1–49.Find this resource:

Weatherson, B. 2006. Intrinsic and extrinsic properties, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = 〈http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intrinsic-extrinsic/〉.Find this resource:

Webber, B., M. Stone, A. Joshi, and A. Knott. 2003. Anaphora and discourse structure, Computational Linguistics 29(4): 545–88.Find this resource:

Wechsler, S. 1995. The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure, Stanford: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Wechsler, S. 2008. Idioms, light verbs and lexical decomposition. Talk presented at the NORMS Workshop on Argument Structure, University of Lund, Sweden, 5–6 February.Find this resource:

Weinreich, U. 1972. Explorations in Semantic Theory, The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Weiskopf, D. 2007. Compound nominals, context, and compositionality Synthese 156: 161–204. (p. 721) Find this resource:

Wells, R. 1947. Immediate constituents, Language 23: 81–117.Find this resource:

Werning, M. 2003a. Synchrony and composition: Toward a cognitive architecture between classicism and connectionism. In B. Löwe, W. Malzkorn, and T. Raesch (eds), Applications of Mathematical Logic in Philosophy and Linguistics, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 261–78.Find this resource:

Werning, M. 2003b. Ventral vs. dorsal pathway: The source of the semantic object/event and the syntactic noun/verb distinction, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 263: 299–300.Find this resource:

Werning, M. 2004. Compositionaltity, context, categories and the indeterminacy of translation, Erkenntnis 60(2): 145–78.Find this resource:

Werning, M. 2005a. The temporal dimension of thought: Cortical foundations of predicative representation, Synthese 146(1/2): 203–24.Find this resource:

Werning, M. 2005b. Right and wrong reasons for compositionality. In M. Werning, E. Machery, and G. Schurz (eds), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content Vol. I: Foundational Issues, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 285–309.Find this resource:

Werning, M. 2005c. Neuronal synchronization, covariation, and compositional representation. In E. Machery, M. Werning, and G. Schurz (eds), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content Vols. II: Applications to Linguistics, Philosophy and Neuroscience, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 283–312.Find this resource:

Werning, M. 2008. The complex first paradox: Why do semantically thick concepts so early lexicalize as nouns? Interaction Studies 9: 67–83.Find this resource:

Werning, M. 2010. Complex first? On the evolutionary and developmental priority of semantically thick words. Philosophy of Science 77: 1096–1108.Find this resource:

Werning, M. 2011. The compositional brain: A unification of conceptual and neuronal perspectives. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag (in press).Find this resource:

Werning, M. and A. Maye. 2006. The neural basis of the object concept in ambiguous and illusionary perception. In R. Sun and N. Miyake (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, London: Erlbaum, 876–81.Find this resource:

Wertheimer, M. 1950. Gestalt theory. In W. D. Ellis (ed.), A Sourcebook of Gestalt Psychology, New York: The Humanities Press, 1–11. Original work published 1924.Find this resource:

Wertheimer,M. 1958. Principles of perceptual organization.In D. G. Beardslee and M. Wertheimer (eds), Readings in Perception, Princeton: Van Nostrand.Find this resource:

Westermann, G. 1998. Emergent modularity and u-shaped learning in a constructivist neural network learning the English past tense, Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1130–5.Find this resource:

Westermann, G. 2000. Constructivist Neural Network Models of Cognitive Development, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Find this resource:

Westermann, G., D. Mareschal, M. H. Johnson, S. Sirois, M. W. Spratling, and M. S. C. Thomas. 2007. Neuroconstructivism, Developmental Science 10: 75–83.Find this resource:

Westerståhl, D. 1998. On mathematical proofs of the vacuity of compositionality, Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 635–43.Find this resource:

Westerståhl, D. 2004. On the compositional extension problem, Journal of Philosophical Logic 33, 549–82.Find this resource:

Westerståhl, D. 2011. Compositionality in Kaplan style semantics. This volume.Find this resource:

Wierzbicka, A. 1972. Semantic Primitives, Frankfurt a.M.: Athenäum.Find this resource:

Wierzbicka, A. 1985. Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis, Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Find this resource:

Wierzbicka, A. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals, New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Williams, A. 2005. Complex Causatives and Verbal Valence. Doctoral Dissertation: University of Pennsylvania. (p. 722) Find this resource:

Williams, A. 2007. Patients in Igbo and Mandarin. In J. Dölling and T. Heye-Zybatow (eds), Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Williams, J. R. G. 2005. The Inscrutability of Reference. Dissertation, University of St Andrews. https://webspace.utexas.edu/deverj/personal/test/inscrutabilityofreference.pdf.Find this resource:

Wilson, C. 1989. Leibniz’s Metaphysics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Wilson, D.S. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Wilson, H. R. and J. D. Cowan. 1972. Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons, Biophysical Journal 121.Find this resource:

Winograd, T. 1972. Understanding Natural Language, New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Wisniewski, E. J. 1996. Construal and similarity in conceptual combination, Journal of Memory and Language, 35: 434–53.Find this resource:

Wisniewski, E. J. 1997. When concepts combine, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4: 167–83.Find this resource: