Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 23 January 2022

Abstract and Keywords

This chapter argues that scholarly works on employment discrimination have had little influence on practice for three reasons: accessibility, scope, and relevance. It begins by discussing how the accessibility of scholarly works is limited by the fact that few persons outside academia have access to them, or that their authors do not seem to recognize the need to explain or even address how their findings might be applied to practical situations. The article then shows that most scholarly works in employment discrimination do not give sufficient consideration to factors that underlie discrimination across several venues such as housing, or focus too narrowly on one target group defined on the basis of race, nationality, gender, age, religion, and so forth. It also looks at some problems with current research methodologies and offers suggestions on how research can be more influential in developing practices that combat discrimination in the workplace.

Keywords: scholarly work, employment, accessibility, scope, relevance, methodology, discrimination, workplace, research

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.