Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 17 October 2019

(p. 666) References

(p. 666) References

Aarts, B. (2004). ‘Modelling Linguistic Gradience’, Studies in Language 28: 1–49.Find this resource:

Abney, S. (1987). ‘The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect’, Ph.D. diss., MIT.Find this resource:

Abraham, W., and Leiss, E. (2006). ‘Personal and Impersonal Passives: Definite vs. Indefinite Diatheses’, Transactions of the Philological Society 104: 230–59.Find this resource:

Agee, D. M., and Marlett, S. A. (1987). ‘Indirect Objects and Incorporation in Mazatec’, Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota 30: 59–76.Find this resource:

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (1998). ‘Warekena’, in D. Derbyshire and G. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. 4. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 225–439.Find this resource:

—— (2000). Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2002). Language Contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.) (2001). Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— —— and Onishi, M. (eds.) (2001). Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Aissen, J. L. (1979). The Syntax of Causative Constructions. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

—— (1987). Tzotzil Clause Structure. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Agent Focus and Inverse in Tzotzil’, Language 75: 451–85.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–83.Find this resource:

Aitchison, J. (2003). ‘Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Language Change’, in B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 736–43.Find this resource:

Aksu-K, A. A. (1988). The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Slobin, D. I. (1985). ‘Acquisition of Turkish’, in Slobin (1985a: 839–78).Find this resource:

Aldridge, E. (2005). ‘Ergativity and Word Order in Austronesian Languages’, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University.Find this resource:

Alexander, R. M. (1988). ‘A Syntactic Sketch of Ocotepec Mixtec’, in C. H. Bradley and B. E. Hollenbach (eds.), Studies in the Syntax of Mixtecan Languages, vol. 1. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 151–304.Find this resource:

Allan, K. (1977). ‘Classifiers’, Language 53: 284–310.Find this resource:

Allen, G. D. (1972). ‘The Location of Rhythmic Stress Beats in English: An Experimental Study, I and II’, Language and Speech 15: 72–100, 179–95.Find this resource:

Allen, S. E. M. (1996). Aspects of Argument Structure Acquisition in Inuktitut. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Altenberg, E., and Vago, R. (1983). ‘Theoretical Implications of an Error Analysis of Second Language Phonology Production’, Language Learning 33: 427–47.Find this resource:

(p. 667) Amberber, M. (2000). ‘Valency-Changing and Valency-Encoding Devices in Amharic’, in Dixon and Aikhenvald (2000: 312–32).Find this resource:

Andersen, E. S. (1978). ‘Lexical Universals of Body-Part Terminology’, in J. H. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 3. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 335–68.Find this resource:

Andersen, P. K. (1991). A New Look at the Passive. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Find this resource:

—— (1994a). Empirical Studies in Diathesis. Münster: Nodus.Find this resource:

—— (1994b). ‘Remarks on Dionysios Thrax's Concept of “Diathesis”’, Historiographia Linguistica 21: 1–37.Find this resource:

Andersen, T. (1988). ‘Ergativity in Päri, a Nilotic OVS Language’, Lingua 75: 289–324.Find this resource:

Anderson, J. (1987). ‘The Markedness Differential Hypothesis and Syllable Structure Difficulty’, in G. Ioup and S. Weinberger (eds.), Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of a Second Language Sound System. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House, 279–91.Find this resource:

Anderson, L. B. (1974). ‘Distinct Sources of Fuzzy Data: Ways of Integrating Relatively Discrete and Gradient Aspects of Language, and Explaining Grammar on the Basis of Semantic Fields’, in R. W. Shuy and C.- J. N. Bailey (eds.), Towards Tomorrow's Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 50–64.Find this resource:

—— (1982). ‘The “Perfect” as a Universal and as a Language-Specific Category’, in Hopper (1982: 227–64).Find this resource:

—— (1986). ‘Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries’, in Chafe and Nichols (1986: 273–312).Find this resource:

Anderson, S. R. (1976). ‘On the Notion of Subject in Ergative Languages’, in Li (1976: 1–23).Find this resource:

—— (1985a). Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— (1985b). ‘Inflectional Morphology’, in T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 150–201.Find this resource:

—— (1993). ‘Wackernagel's Revenge: Clitics, Morphology, and the Syntax of Second Position’, Language 69: 68–98.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘A Formalist's Reading of Some Functionalist Work in Syntax’, in M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley (eds.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 111–35.Find this resource:

Anderwald, L., and Kortmann, B. (2002). ‘Typology and Dialectology: A Programmatic Sketch’, in J. Berns and J. van Maarle (eds.), Present Day Dialectology: Problems and Findings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 159–72.Find this resource:

Angdembe, T. M. (1998). ‘Antipassive via Noun Incorporation: Future of the Limbu Object Agreement’, Journal of Nepalese Studies 2: 17–25.Find this resource:

Antinucci, F. (1977). Fondamenti di una teoria tipologica del linguaggio. Bologna: Il Mulino.Find this resource:

—— Duranti, A., and Gebert, L. (1979). ‘Relative Clause Structure, Relative Clause Perception and the Change from SOV to SVO’, Cognition 7: 145–76.Find this resource:

Anttila, R. (1989). Historical and Comparative Linguistics. 2nd rev. edn. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Anward, J., Moravcsik, E. A., and Stassen, L. (1997). ‘Parts of Speech: A Challenge for Typology’, Linguistic Typology 1: 167–83.Find this resource:

Apresjan, J. D. (1974). Leksiceskaja semantika: Sinonimiceskie sredstva jazyka. Moscow: NaukaFind this resource:

. (Trans.

Y. D. Apresjan, Lexical Semantics: User's Guide to Contemporary Russian Vocabulary. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma, 1992Find this resource:

.)

Arensen, J. (1982). Murle Grammar. Juba: SIL Sudan.Find this resource:

(p. 668) Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

—— (1991). ‘The Function of Accessibility in a Theory of Grammar’, Journal of Pragmatics 16: 141–61.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Cognitive Universals and Linguistic Conventions: The Case of Resumptive Pronouns’, Studies in Language 23: 217–69.Find this resource:

Aristar, A. R. (1996). ‘The Relationship Between Dative and Locative: Kuryłowicz's Argument from a Typological Perspective’, Diachronica 13: 207–24.Find this resource:

Aronoff, M. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1994). Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Ascoli, G. I. (1877 [1867]). ‘Review of G. Lignana, La grammatica comparata di BoppFind this resource:

, repr. in

G. I. Ascoli, Studi critici, vol. 2. Rome: Loescher, 31–61Find this resource:

.

Asher, N. (1979). Tamil. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

Austin, P. (1981). A Grammar ofDiyari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘Causatives and Applicatives in Australian Aboriginal Languages’, in K. Matsumura and T. Hayasi (eds.), The Dative and Related Phenomena. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo, 165–225.Find this resource:

—— Bond, O., and Nathan, D. (eds.) (2007). Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory. London: School of Oriental and African Studies. Available at: http://www.hrelp.org/publications/ldlt/papers/ldltproceedings.htmlFind this resource:

—— and Simpson, A. (2007). ‘Introduction’, in P. Austin and A. Simpson (eds.), Endangered Languages. Hamburg: Buske, 5–18.Find this resource:

Babby, L. H. (1983). ‘The Relation between Causative and Voice: Russian vs. Turkish’, Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 11: 61–88.Find this resource:

—— (1989). ‘Subjectlessness, External Subcategorization, and the Projection Principle’, Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku 32: 7–40.Find this resource:

Bach, E. (1971). ‘Questions’, Linguistic Inquiry 2: 153–66.Find this resource:

—— (1984). ‘Some Generalizations of Categorial Grammars’, in F. Landmand and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics. Dordrecht: Foris, 1–23.Find this resource:

—— Jelinek, E., Kratzer, A., and Partee, B. (eds.) (1995). Quantification in Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Back, M. (1979). ‘Die Rekonstruction der idg: Verschlusslautsystems im Lichte der einzelsprachlichen Veränderungen’, Zeitschrift für vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft 93: 179–95.Find this resource:

Baerman, M. (2005). A Survey of Deponency in a Sample of 100 Languages Based on the World Atlas of Language Structures List. 12 December 2007: http://www.smg.surrey.ac.uk/Deponency/WALS/WALS.htm

—— Brown, D., and Corbett, G. (2005). The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Corbett, G. (2007). ‘Linguistic Typology: Morphology’, Linguistic Typology 11: 115–7.Find this resource:

Bailey, C.-J. N. (1973). Variation and Linguistic Theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Find this resource:

Baker, M. C. (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— (1996). The Polysynthesis Parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2001). The Atoms of Language. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

—— and Mccloskey, J. (2005). ‘On the Relationship of Typology to Theoretical Syntax’, paper presented at the LSA Symposium on Typology in America, Oakland, CA.Find this resource:

(p. 669) —— —— (2007). ‘On the Relationship of Typology to Theoretical Syntax’, Linguistic Typology 11: 285–96.Find this resource:

Barker, D., GÓmez RendÓn, J., and Hekking, E. (2008). ‘Spanish Meets Guaraní, Otomí and Quichua: A Multilingual Confrontation’, in T. Stolz, D. Bakker, and R. S. Palomo (eds.), Hispanisation: The Impact of Spanish on the Lexicon and Grammar of the Indigenous Languages of Austronesia and the Americas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bakker, P. (1999). ‘Review of Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists, by Thomas E. Payne’, Linguistic Typology 3: 271–4.Find this resource:

Bally, C. (1926). Le langage et la vie. Paris: Payot.Find this resource:

Bammesberger, A. (1982). ‘On the Ending for Nom. Acc. Du. in Indo-European’, General Linguistics 22: 245–9.Find this resource:

Barlow, M. (1988). ‘A Situated Theory of Agreement’, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University. (Published by Garland Press, New York.)Find this resource:

—— (1991). ‘The Agreement Hierarchy and Grammatical Theory’, in L. A. Sutton, C. Johnson, and R. Shields (eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on the Grammar of Event Structure. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, 30–40.Find this resource:

—— and Ferguson, C. (1988). ‘Introduction’, in M. Barlow and C. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in Natural Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 1–22.Find this resource:

Barnes, J. (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Barrack, C. (2002). ‘The Glottalic Theory Revisited: A Negative Appraisal’, Indogermanische Forschungen 107: 76–95.Find this resource:

Bartsch, R., and Vennemann, T. (1972). Semantic Structures: A Study in the Relation between Semantics and Syntax. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaum.Find this resource:

Barwise, J., and Cooper, R. (1981). ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219.Find this resource:

Bates, E., and MacWhinney, B. (1982). ‘Functionalist Approaches to Grammar’, in E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174–218.Find this resource:

—— —— (1989). ‘Functionalism and the Competition Model’, in B. MacWhinney and E. Bates (eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–73.Find this resource:

Battistella, E. L. (1990). Markedness: The Evaluative Superstructure of Language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Find this resource:

BeauzÉe, N. (1767). Grammaire générale ou exposition raisonnée des éléments nécessaires du langage, pour servir de fondement à lʼétude de toutes les langues. 2 vols. Paris: Barbou. (Repr. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann, 1974.)Find this resource:

Beesley, K., and Karttunen, L. (2003). Finite-State Morphology. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Find this resource:

Behrens, L., and Sasse, H.-J. (2003). The Microstructure of Lexicon-Grammar Interaction: A Study of ‘Gold’ in English and Arabic. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Bell, A. (1978). ‘Language Samples’, in Greenberg et al. (1978: 123–56).Find this resource:

Bellugi, U., and Klima, E. (1976). ‘Two Faces of the Sign: Iconic and Abstract’, in S. R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, and J. Lancaster (eds.), The Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech. New York: Academy of Sciences, 514–38.Find this resource:

Benveniste, E. (1939). ‘Nature du signe linguistique’, Acta Linguistica 1: 23–9.Find this resource:

—— (1946). ‘Relations de personne dans le verbe’, BSL 43: 1–12.Find this resource:

(p. 670) Benveniste, E. (1966 [1952–53]). ‘La Classification des langues’, in Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard, 99–118.Find this resource:

—— (1971). Problems in General Linguistics, trans. Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami.Find this resource:

Benzing, J. (1955). Lamutische Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Find this resource:

Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological Classification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

—— Breedlove, D. E., and Raven, P. H. (1973). ‘General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology’, American Anthropologist 75: 214–42.Find this resource:

—— and Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Repr., with a bibliography by L. Maffi, Stanford, CA: CSLI, 1999.)Find this resource:

Berman, R. A., and Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Bernini, J., and Schwartz, M. (eds.) (2006). Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bertinetto, P. M., and Delfitto, D. (2000). ‘Aspect vs. Actionality: Why They Should Be Kept Apart’, in Dahl (2000a: 189–225).Find this resource:

Beyrer, A., Bochmann, K., and Bronsert, S. (1987). Grammatik der Rumanischen Sprache der Gegenwart. Leipzig: Enzyklopadie.Find this resource:

Bhaskararao, P., and Subbarao, K. V. (eds.) (2004). Non-nominative Subjects. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bhat, D. N. S. (1991). Grammatical Relations: Evidence Against Their Necessity and Universality. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

—— (1994). The Adjectival Category: Criteria for Differentiation and Identification. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (1999). The Prominence of Tense, Aspect, and Mood. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (2004). Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Ningomba, M. S. (1997). Manipuri Grammar. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Bickel, B. (1995). ‘In the Vestibule of Meaning: Transitivity Inversion as a Morphological Phenomenon’, Studies in Language 19: 73–127.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘From Ergativus Absolutus to Topic Marking in Kiranti: A Typological Perspective’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 25: 38–49.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Introduction: Person and Evidence in Himalayan Languages’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23: 1–11.Find this resource:

—— (2004a). ‘Hidden Syntax in Belhare’, in A. Saxena (ed.), Himalayan Languages: Past and Present. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 141–90.Find this resource:

—— (2004b). ‘The Syntax of Experiencers in the Himalayas’, in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: 77–112).Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Typology in the 21st Century: Major Current Developments’, paper presented at the workshop ‘Typology in American Linguistics: An Appraisal of the Field’, Oakland, CA.Find this resource:

—— (2006a). ‘Clause-Level vs. Predicate-Level Linking’, in I. Bornkessel, M. Schlesewsky, B. Comrie, and A. D. Friederici (eds.), Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking: Theoretical, Typological and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 155–90.Find this resource:

—— (2006b). ‘What Favors Rara? A Himalayan Case Study’, paper presented at the Rara and Rarissima Conference, Leipzig, March-April. Available at: http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~bickel/research/presentations/index.htmlFind this resource:

(p. 671) —— (2007). ‘Typology in the 21st Century: Major Current Developments’, Linguistic Typology 11: 239–51.Find this resource:

—— (2008a). ‘On the Scope of the Referential Hierarchy in the ʻTypology of Grammatical Relations’, in G. G. Corbett and M. Noonan (eds.), Case and Grammatical Relations: Studies in Honor of Bernard Comrie. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 191–210.Find this resource:

—— (2008b). ‘A Refined Sampling Procedure for Genealogical Control’, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61: 221–33.Find this resource:

—— and Gaenszle, M. (2005). ‘1P Antipassives and the Political History of the Southern Kirant’, paper presented at the 11th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Bangkok, 6–9 December.Find this resource:

—— —— Rai, A., Rai, P. D., Rai, S. K., Rai, V. S., and Sharma (Gautam), N. P. (2007). ‘Two Ways of Suspending Object Agreement in Puma: Between Incorporation, Antipassivization, and Optional Agreement’, Himalayan Linguistics 7: 1–18.Find this resource:

—— and Nichols, J. (2001). ‘Syntactic Ergativity in Light Verb Complements’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 27: 39–52.Find this resource:

—— —— (2007). ‘Inflectional Morphology’, in Shopen (2007: 169–240).Find this resource:

—— —— (2009). ‘Case-Marking and Alignment’, in Malchukov and Spencer (2009: 304–21).Find this resource:

—— —— and YĀdava, Y. P. (2000). ‘A Fresh Look at Grammatical Relations in Indo-Aryan’, Lingua 110: 343–73.Find this resource:

Bickerton, D. (1981). The Roots of Language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Find this resource:

Bisang, W. (1996). ‘Areal Typology and Grammaticalization: Processes of Grammaticalization Based on Nouns and Verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian Languages’, Studies in Language 20.3: 519–97.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Dialectology and Typology: An Integrative Perspective’, in Kortmann (2004: 11–46).Find this resource:

—— (2008). ‘Precategoriality and Argument Structure Constructions in Late Archaic Chinese’, in J. Leino (ed.), Constructional Reorganization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Blake, B. J. (1982). ‘The Absolutive: Its Scope in English and Kalkatungu’, in Hopper and Thompson (1982a: 71–94).Find this resource:

—— (1987). Australian Aboriginal Grammar. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

—— (2001a). case. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2001b). ‘Global Trends in Language’, Linguistics 39.5: 1009–29.Find this resource:

Blevins, J. (1993). ‘A Tonal Analysis of Lithuanian Nominal Accent’, Language 69: 237–73.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘The Syllable in Phonological Theory’, in J. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 206–44.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Stems and Paradigms’, Language 79: 737–67.Find this resource:

—— (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Endangered Sound Patterns: Three Perspectives on Theory and Description’, Language Documentation and Conservation 1: 1–16. Available at: http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldcFind this resource:

—— and Garrett, A. (1998). ‘The Origins of Consonant-Vowel Metathesis’, Language 74: 508–56.Find this resource:

Bloom, H. (1979). ‘Language Creation in the Manual Modality’, B.Sc. diss., University of Chicago.Find this resource:

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Find this resource:

Boas, F. (1911). ‘Introduction’, in Boas (1911–22: i. 5–83).Find this resource:

(p. 672) Boas, F. (1911–22). Handbook of American Indian Languages. 2 vols. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology/Government Printing Office.Find this resource:

Boeder, W. (1969). ‘Uber die Versionen des georgischen Verbs’, Folia Linguistica 2: 82–152.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘The South Caucasian Languages’, Lingua 115: 5–89.Find this resource:

Bolinger, D. (1977). The Form of Language. London: Longman.Find this resource:

—— (1978). ‘Intonation Across Languages’, in Greenberg et al. (1978: 471–524).Find this resource:

Bomhard, A. (2002). Reconstructing Proto-Nostratic: Comparative Phonology, Morphology, and Vocabulary, vol. 1. Charleston, SC: Signum.Find this resource:

Bonch-Osmolovskaja, A., Rakhilina, E. V., and Reznikova, T. I. (forthcoming). ‘Towards a Typology of Pain Predicates’, special issue of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Bopp, F. (1985 [1816]). A Comparative Grammar of the Sanscrit, Zend, Greek, Latin, Lithuanian, German, and Slavonic Languages, trans. E. Eastwick. Hildesheim: Olms.Find this resource:

Bossong, G. (1985a). Empirische Universalienforschung: Differentielle Objektmarkierung in Neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

—— (1985b). ‘Markierung der Aktantenfunktionen im Guaraní: Zur Frage der Differentiellen Objektmarkierung in Nicht-akkusativischen Sprachen’, in F. Plank (ed.), Relational Typology. Berlin: Mouton, 1–30.Find this resource:

Boster, J. (1980). ‘How Exceptions Prove the Rule: An Analysis of Informant Disagreement in Aguaruna Manioc Identification’, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Bowerman, M. (1973). Early Syntactic Development: A Cross-linguistic Comparison, with Special Reference to Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1978). ‘Systematizing Semantic Knowledge: Changes over Time in the Child's Organization of Word Meaning’, Child Development 49: 977–87.Find this resource:

—— (1980). ‘The Structure and Origin of Semantic Categories in the Language-Learning Child’, in M. L. Foster and S. H. Brandes (eds.), Symbol as Sense: New Approaches to the Analysis of Meaning. New York: Academic Press, 271–99.Find this resource:

—— (1982). ‘Starting to Talk Worse: Clues to Language Acquisition from Children's Late Speech Errors’, in S. Strauss (ed.), U-shaped Behavioral Growth. New York: Academic Press, 101–45.Find this resource:

—— (1985). ‘What Shapes Children's Grammars?’, in Slobin (1985b: 1257–1319).Find this resource:

—— (1990). ‘Mapping Thematic Roles onto Syntactic Functions: Are Children Helped by Innate Linking Rules?’, Linguistics 28: 1253–89.Find this resource:

—— (1993). ‘Typological Perspectives on Language Acquisition: Do Crosslinguistic Patterns Predict Development?’, in E. V. Clark (ed.), The Proceedings of the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 7–15.Find this resource:

—— (1994). ‘From Universal to Language-Specific in Early Grammatical Development’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 346: 34–45.Find this resource:

—— (1996). ‘Learning How to Structure Space for Language: A Crosslinguistic Perspective’, in P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 385–436.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Where Do Children's Word Meanings Come from? Rethinking the Role of Cognition in Early Semantic Development’, in L. P. Nucci, G. Saxe, and E. Turiel (eds.), Culture, Thought, and Development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 199–230.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Why Can't You “Open” a Nut or “Break” a Cooked Noodle? Learning Covert Object Categories in Action Word Meanings’, in L. Gershkoff-Stowe and D. H. Rakison (eds.), Building Object Categories in Developmental Time. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 209–43.Find this resource:

(p. 673) —— (2007). ‘Elicited Production: Tools for Semantic Typology’, paper presented at the Pre-ALT workshop on Linguistic Typology and Language Documentation, Paris, 24–25 September.Find this resource:

—— and Brown, P. (eds.) (2008a). Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

—— (2008b). ‘Introduction’, in Bowerman and Brown (2008a: 1–26).Find this resource:

—— and Choi, S. (2001). ‘Shaping Meanings for Language: Universal and Language-Specific in the Acquisition of Spatial Semantic Categories’, in M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 475–511.Find this resource:

—— —— (2003). ‘Space under Construction: Language-Specific Spatial Categorization in First Language Acquisition’, in D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 387–427.Find this resource:

—— de LeÓn, L., and Choi, S. (1995). ‘Verbs, Particles, and Spatial Semantics: Learning to Talk about Spatial Actions in Typologically Different Languages’, in E. V. Clark (ed.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 101–10.Find this resource:

—— Majid, A., Erkelens, M., Narasimhan, B., and Chen, J. (2004). ‘Learning How to Encode Events of “Cutting and Breaking”: A Crosslinguistic Study of Semantic Development’, poster presented at the Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University, April.Find this resource:

—— and Pederson, E. (1992). ‘Cross-linguistic Studies of Spatial Semantic Organization’, Annual Report of the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics 1992, 53–6.Find this resource:

Bradley, D. (1993). ‘Pronouns in Burmese-Lolo’, Linguistics in the Tibeto-Burman Area 16: 157–215.Find this resource:

BrÉal, M. (1897). Essai de sémantique. Paris: Hachette.Find this resource:

Breen, G., and Pensalfini, R. (1999). ‘Arrernte: A Language with No Syllable Onsets’, Linguistic Inquiry 30: 1–25.Find this resource:

Bresnan, J. (2001). ‘The Emergence of the Unmarked Pronoun’, in G. Legendre, J. Grimshaw, and S. Vikner (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 113–42.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘The Lexicon in Optimality Theory’, in S. Stevenson and P. Merlo (eds.), The Lexical Basis of Syntactic Processing: Formal, Computational and Experimental Issues. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 39–58.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘A Few Lessons from Typology’, Linguistic Typology 11: 297–306.Find this resource:

—— and Aissen, J. (2002). ‘Optimality and Functionality: Objections and Refutations’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 81–95.Find this resource:

—— Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., and Baaten, R. H. (2004). ‘Predicting the Dative Alternation’, paper presented at the KNAW Academy Colloquium on the Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Stanford University.Find this resource:

—— and Nikitina, T. (2003). ‘On the Gradience of the Dative Alternation’. Available at: http://www.stanford.edu/~bresnan/publications/index.html

Bricyn, V. M., Raxilina, E. V., Reznikova, T. I., and Javorskaja, G. M. (2009). Koncept boli v tipologičeskom osveščenii. Kiev: Burago.Find this resource:

Broschart, J. (1991). ‘Noun, Verb, and Participation: A Typology of the Noun/Verb Distinction’, in H. Seiler and W. Premper (eds.), Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten. Tübingen: Narr, 65–137.Find this resource:

(p. 674) Broschart, J. (1997). ‘Why Tongan Does It Differently: Categorial Distinctions in a Language Without Nouns and Verbs’, Linguistic Typology 1: 123–65.Find this resource:

Broselow, E. (1983). ‘Non-obvious Transfer: On Predicting Epenthesis Errors’, in S. Gass and L. Selinker (eds.), Language Transfer in Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 269–80.Find this resource:

Browman, C. P., and Goldstein, L. M. (1992). ‘Articulatory Phonology: An Overview’, Phonetica 49: 155–80.Find this resource:

Brown, C. (1976). ‘General Principles of Human Anatomical Partonomy and Speculations on the Growth of Partonomic Nomenclature’, American Anthropologist 3: 400–424.Find this resource:

Brown, P. (1994). ‘The Ins and Ons of Tzeltal Locative Expressions: The Semantics of Static Descriptions of Location’, Linguistics 32: 743–90.Find this resource:

—— and Levinson, S. C. (2009). ‘Language as Mind Tools: Learning How to Think through Speaking’, in Guo et al. (2009: 451–63).Find this resource:

Brown, R. (1973). A First Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Brugmann, K. (1897). The Nature and Origin of the Noun Genders in the Indo-European Languages, trans. E. Robbins. New York: Scribner's.Find this resource:

Bugenhagen, R. D. (1994). ‘The Semantics of Irrealis in the Austronesian Languages of Papua New Guinea’, in G. P. Reesink (ed.), Topics in Descriptive Austronesian Linguistics. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, 1–39.Find this resource:

Butler, C. (1985). Statistics in Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. Available at: http://www.uwe.ac.uk/hlss/llas/statistics-in-linguistics/bkindex.shtmlFind this resource:

Butt, M. (2006). Theories of Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘The Diachronic Dimension in Explanation’, in Hawkins (1988: 350–79).Find this resource:

—— (1994). ‘The Grammaticization of Zero: Asymmetries in Tense and Aspect Systems’, in Pagliuca (1994: 235–54).Find this resource:

—— (1995a). ‘Regular Morphology and the Lexicon’, Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 425–55.Find this resource:

—— (1995b). ‘The Semantic Development of Past Tense Modals in English’, in Bybee and Fleischman (1995: 503–17).Find this resource:

—— (1998a). ‘A Functionalist Approach to Grammar and Its Evolution’, Evolution of Communication 2: 249–78.Find this resource:

—— (1998b). ‘“Irrealis” as a Grammatical Category’, Anthropological Linguistics 40: 257–71.Find this resource:

—— (2001). Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition’, Presidential address given at the meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Oakland, CA.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘From Usage to Grammar’, Language 82: 711–33.Find this resource:

—— and Brewer, M. A. (1980). ‘Explanation in Morphophonemics: Changes in Provençal and Spanish Preterite Forms’, Lingua 52: 201–42.Find this resource:

—— and Dahl, Ö. (1989). ‘The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World’, Studies in Language 13: 51–103.Find this resource:

—— and Fleischman, S. (eds.) (1995). Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— and Hopper, P. (eds.) (2001). Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

(p. 675) —— Perkins, R., and Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Byrne, J. (1885). General Principles of the Structure of Language. London: Trübner.Find this resource:

Campbell, L. (1996). ‘Typological and Areal Issues in Grammar’, in K. Brown and J. Miller (eds.), Concise Encyclopaedia of Syntactic Theories. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 339–43.Find this resource:

—— (1998). Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (2001). Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment. Special issue of Language Sciences (23).Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Areal Linguistics: A Closer Scrutiny’, in Matras et al. (2006: 1–31).Find this resource:

—— and Janda, R. (2001). ‘Introduction: Conceptions of Grammaticalization and Their Problems’, Language Sciences 23: 93–112.Find this resource:

—— Kaufman, T., and Smith-Stark, T. C. (1986). ‘Meso-America as a Linguistic Area’, Language 62: 530–70.Find this resource:

Carey, S. (2001). ‘Whorf versus Continuity Theorists: Bringing Data to Bear on the Debate’, in M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 185–214.Find this resource:

Carlisle, R. S. (1991). ‘The Influence of Environment on Vowel Epenthesis in Spanish/English Interphonology’, Applied Linguistics 12: 76–95.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘The Modification of Onsets in a Markedness Relationship: Testing the Inter-language Structural Conformity Hypothesis’, Language Learning 47: 327–61.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘The Acquisition of Onsets in a Markedness Relationship: A Longitudinal Study’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 245–60.Find this resource:

Chafe, W. (1995). ‘The Realis—Irrealis Distinction in Caddo, the Northern Iroquoian Languages, and English’, in Bybee and Fleischman (1995: 349–66).Find this resource:

—— and Nichols, J. (eds.) (1986). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Find this resource:

Chappell, H., and Mcgregor, W. (eds.) (1996). The Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part—Whole Relation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

CharachidzÉ, G. (1981). Grammaire de la langue avar. Paris: Jean-Favard.Find this resource:

Chelliah, S. (2001). ‘The Role of Text Collection and Elicitation in Linguistic Fieldwork’, in P. Newman and M. Ratliff (eds.), Linguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152–65.Find this resource:

Chen, J. (2008). ‘The Acquisition of Verb Compounding in Mandarin Chinese’, Ph.D. diss., Free University, Amsterdam.Find this resource:

Cheng, L. L.-S. (1991). ‘On the Typology of Wh-Questions’, Ph.D. diss., MIT.Find this resource:

—— (1997). On the Typology of Wh-Questions. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Choi, J. (1991). ‘An Acoustic Study of Kabardian Vowels’, Journal of the International Phonetic Association 21: 4–12.Find this resource:

Choi, S. (1995). ‘The Development of Epistemic Modal Forms and Functions in Korean Children’, in Bybee and Fleischman (1995: 165–204).Find this resource:

—— and Bowerman, M. (1991). ‘Learning to Express Motion Events in English and Korean: The Influence of Language-Specific Lexicalization Patterns’, Cognition 41: 83–121.Find this resource:

Chomsky, N. (1955). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University and MIT. (Rev. edn. New York: Plenum, 1975.)Find this resource:

—— (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— (1959). ‘Review of Verbal Behavior, by B. F. Skinner’, Language 35: 26–58.Find this resource:

(p. 676) Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1980). ‘On Cognitive Structures and Their Development: A Reply to Piaget’, in M. Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 35–52.Find this resource:

—— (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

—— (1986a). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1986b). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Find this resource:

—— (1995a). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1995b). ‘Bare Phrase Structure’, in G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell, 383–439.Find this resource:

—— (1998 [1977]). ‘Language and Responsibility’, in N. Chomsky, On Language. New York: New Press, 1–197.Find this resource:

—— and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Find this resource:

Chung, S. (1994). ‘Wh-Agreement and “Referentiality” in Chamorro’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 1–44.Find this resource:

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Clancy, P. M., Jacobsen, T., and Silva, M. (1976). ‘The Acquisition of Conjunctions: A Cross-linguistic Study’, Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 12: 71–80.Find this resource:

—— Lee, H., and Zoh, M. (1986). ‘Processing Strategies in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses’, Cognition 14: 225–62.Find this resource:

Clark, E. V. (1973). ‘What's in a Word? On the Child's Acquisition of Semantics in His First Language’, in T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York: Academic Press, 65–110.Find this resource:

—— (1976). ‘Universal Categories: On the Semantics of Classifiers and Children's Early Word Meanings’, in A. Juilland (ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday, vol. 3: Syntax. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri, 449–62.Find this resource:

—— (1983). ‘Meanings and Concepts’, in C. H. Mussen (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. 3: Cognitive Development. New York: Wiley, 787–840.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Emergent Categories in First Language Acquisition’, in M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 379–405.Find this resource:

—— and Clark, H. H. (1979). ‘When Nouns Surface as Verbs’, Language 55: 767–811.Find this resource:

Clark, H. H., and Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Find this resource:

—— —— (1978). ‘Universals, Relativity and Language Processing’, in J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 225–77.Find this resource:

Clark, T. W. (1989). Introduction to Nepali. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar.Find this resource:

Coates, J. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Cole, P. (1976). ‘An Apparent Asymmetry in the Formation of Relative Clauses in Modern Hebrew’, in P. Cole (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 231–47.Find this resource:

—— (1982). Imbambura Quechua. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

—— Herman, G., and Nasanius Tjung, Y. (2005). ‘How Irregular is WH in Situ in Indonesian?’, Studies in Language 29: 553–81.Find this resource:

Collinge, N. E. (1995). The Laws of Indo-European. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

(p. 677) Comrie, B. (1973). ‘The Ergative: Variations on a Theme’, Lingua 32: 239–53.Find this resource:

—— (1975a). ‘The Anti-Ergative: Finland's Answer to Basque’, Chicago Linguistic Society 11: 112–21.Find this resource:

—— (1975b). ‘Causatives and Universal Grammar’, Transactions of the Philological Society 1974: 1–32.Find this resource:

—— (1975c). ‘Polite Plurals and Predicate Agreement’, Language 51: 406–18.Find this resource:

—— (1976a). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1976b). ‘The Syntax of Causative Constructions: Cross-language Similarities and Divergences’, in Shibatani (1976a: 261–312).Find this resource:

—— (1977). ‘In Defense of Spontaneous Demotion: The Impersonal Passive’, in P. Cole and J. Sadock (eds.), Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic Press, 47–58.Find this resource:

—— (1978). ‘Ergativity’, in Lehmann (1978a: 329–94).Find this resource:

—— (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— (1985a). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1985b). ‘Causative Verb Formation and Other Verb-deriving Morphology’, in T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 309–48.Find this resource:

—— (1988a). ‘Coreference and Conjunction Reduction in Grammar and Discourse’, in Hawkins (1988: 186–208).Find this resource:

—— (1988b). ‘Passive and Voice’, in M. Shibatani (ed.), Passive and Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 9–23.Find this resource:

—— (1988c). ‘Linguistic Typology’, Annual Review of Anthropology 17: 145–59.Find this resource:

—— (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

—— (1993). ‘Language Universals and Linguistic Typology’, Sprachtypologie und Universa lienforschung 46: 3–14.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Rethinking the Typology of Relative Clauses’, Language Design 1: 59–86.Find this resource:

—— (2003a). ‘On Explaining Language Universals’, in Tomasello (2003b: 195–209).Find this resource:

—— (2003b). ‘Typology and Language Acquisition: The Case of Relative Clauses’, in Giacalone Ramat (2003: 19–37).Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Alignment of Case Marking’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 398–405).Find this resource:

—— Haspelmath, M., and Bickel, B. (2008). ‘The Leipzig Glossing Rules’. Rev. version, February 2008. Available at: http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.phpFind this resource:

—— and Kuteva, T. (2005). ‘Relativization Strategies’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 494–501).Find this resource:

—— and Polinsky, M. (eds.) (1993). Causatives and Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— —— (1998). ‘The Great Daghestan Case Hoax’, in A. Siewierska and J. J. Song (eds.), Case, Typology and Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 95–114.Find this resource:

Cook, E.-D. (2004). A Grammar of Dene Suline. Winnipeg, MB: Algonkian and Iroquoian Linguistics.Find this resource:

Cooreman, A. (1994). ‘A Functional Typology of Antipassives’, in B. A. Fox and P. J. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and Function. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 49–88.Find this resource:

Corbett, G. G. (1979). ‘The Agreement Hierarchy’, Journal of Linguistics 15: 203–24.Find this resource:

—— (1983). Hierarchies, Targets and Controllers: Agreement Patterns in Slavic. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘The Morphology/Syntax Interface: Evidence from Possessive Adjectives in Slavonic’, Language 63: 299–345.Find this resource:

(p. 678) Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1994). ‘Gender and Gender Systems’, in R. Asher (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1347–53.Find this resource:

—— (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Davies, I. R. (1995). ‘Linguistic and Behavioural Measures for Ranking Basic Colour Terms’, Studies in Language 19: 301–57.Find this resource:

—— and Morgan, G. (1988). ‘Colour Terms in Russian: Reflections of Typological Constraints in a Single Language’, Journal of Linguistics 24: 31–64.Find this resource:

Corder, S. P. (1971). ‘Idiosyncratic Dialects and Error Analysis’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 9: 149–59.Find this resource:

Cormier, K. (2005). ‘Exclusive Pronouns in American Sign Language’, in E. Filimonova (ed.), Clusivity: Typological and Case Studies in Inclusive/Exclusive Distinction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 231–58.Find this resource:

Cornish, F. (1986). Anaphoric Relations in English and French: A Discourse Perspective. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Coseriu, E. (1968). ‘Adam Smith und die Anfange der Sprachtypologie’, in H. E. Brekle and L. Lipka (eds.), Wortbildung, Syntax und Morphologie: Festschrift Hans Marchand. The Hague: Mouton, 46–54.Find this resource:

—— (1973). ‘Sulla tipologia linguistica di Wilhelm von Humboldt: contributo alla critica della tradizione linguistica’, Lingua e stile 8: 235–66.Find this resource:

Costello, J. (1982). ‘The Absolute Construction in Indo-European: A Syntagmemic Reconstruction’, Journal of Indo-European Studies 10: 235–52.Find this resource:

—— (1983). Syntactic Change and Syntactic Reconstruction. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Find this resource:

Cristofaro, S. (2003). Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Past Habituals and Irrealis’, in Lander et al. (2004: 256–72).Find this resource:

—— and Giacalone Ramat, A. (2002). ‘Relativization Patterns in Mediterranean Languages, with Particular Reference to the Relativization of Time Circumstantials’, in Ramat and Stolz (2002: 102–12).Find this resource:

Croft, W. (1990). Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— (1993). ‘Case Marking and the Semantics of Mental Verbs’, in J. Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 55–72.Find this resource:

—— (1995a). ‘Modern Syntactic Typology’, in Shibatani and Bynon (1995: 85–144).Find this resource:

—— (1995b). ‘Autonomy and Functionalist Linguistics’, Language 71: 490–532.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Linguistic Evidence and Mental Representations’, Cognitive Linguistics 9: 51–73.Find this resource:

—— (2000a). Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman.Find this resource:

—— (2000b). ‘Parts of Speech as Typological Universals and as Language Particular Categories’, in P. M. Vogel and B. Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 65–102.Find this resource:

—— (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2003a). Typology and Universals. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2003b). ‘Lexical Rules vs. Constructions: A False Dichotomy’, in H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, and K.-U. Panther (eds.), Motivation in Language: Studies in Honour of Gunter Radden. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 49–68.Find this resource:

(p. 679) —— (2003c). ‘Typology’, in M. Aronoff and J. Rees-Miller (eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 337–68.Find this resource:

—— (2007a). ‘Beyond Aristotle and Gradience: A Reply to Aarts’, Studies in Language 31: 409–30.Find this resource:

—— (2007b). ‘Typology and Linguistic Theory in the Past Decade: A Personal View’, Linguistic Typology 11: 79–91.Find this resource:

Crowley, T. (1982). The Paamese Language of Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Crystal, D. (1967). ‘Word Classes in English’, Lingua 17: 24–56.Find this resource:

Curnow, T. J. (2001). ‘What Language Features can be “Borrowed”?’, in Aikhenvald and Dixon (2001: 412–36).Find this resource:

Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., and Segui, J. (1986). ‘The Syllable's Differing Role in the Segmentation of French and English’, Journal of Memory and Language 25: 385–400.Find this resource:

Cysouw, M. (2003a). The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2003b). ‘Against Implicational Universals’, Linguistic Typology 7: 89–101.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘The Importance of Rara for Linguistic Theory’, paper presented at the Rara and Rarissima Conference, Leipzig, March-April. Available at: http://email.eva.mpg.de/cysouw/presentations.htmlFind this resource:

—— (ed.) (2008). Using the World Atlas of Language Structures. Special issue of Sprachty-pologie und Universalienforschung (61.3).Find this resource:

—— and Wälchli, B. (eds.) (2007). Parallel Texts: Using Translational Equivalents in Linguistic Typology. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalforschungen (60.2).Find this resource:

Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘Areal Tendencies in Tense-Aspect Systems’, in P. M. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, O. Dahl, and M. Squartini (eds.), Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier, 11–28.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (2000a). Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (2000b). ‘The Tense-Aspect Systems of European Languages in a Typological Perspective’, in Dahl (2000a: 3–25).Find this resource:

—— (2000c). ‘Egophoricity in Discourse and Syntax’, Functions of Language 7: 37–78.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Principles of Areal Typology’, in Haspelmath et al. (2001: ii. 1456–70).Find this resource:

—— (2004a). The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (2004b). ‘Definite Articles in Scandinavian: Competing Grammaticalization Processes in Standard and Non-standard Varieties’, in Kortmann (2004: 147–80).Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘From Questionnaires to Parallel Corpora in Typology’, Sprachtypologie und Universalforschungen 60: 172–81.Find this resource:

—— (2008). ‘An Exercise in a posteriori Language Sampling’, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61: 208–20.Find this resource:

—— and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (eds.) (2001a). The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— —— (2001b). ‘Kinship in Grammar’, in I. Baron, M. Herslund, and F. Sorensen (eds.), Dimensions of Possession. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 201–25.Find this resource:

—— and Velupillai, V. (2005a). ‘The Past Tense’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 268–9).Find this resource:

—— —— (2005b). ‘The Perfect’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 271–2).Find this resource:

—— —— (2005c). ‘Perfective/Imperfective Aspect’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 267–8).Find this resource:

(p. 680) DʼAndrade, R. (1995). The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Daniel, M. (2007). ‘Representative Sampling and Typological Explanation: A Phenomeno-logical Lament’, Linguistic Typology 11: 69–78.Find this resource:

—— and Spencer, A. (2009). ‘The Vocative: An Outlier Case’, in Malchukov and Spencer (2009: 626–34).Find this resource:

Danziger, E. (2008). ‘A Person, a Place, or a Thing? Whorfian Consequences of Syntactic Bootstrapping in Mopan Maya’, in Bowerman and Brown (2008a: 29–48).Find this resource:

Dauer, R. M. (1983). ‘Stress-Timing and Syllable-Timing Reanalyzed’, Journal of Phonetics 11: 51–62.Find this resource:

Davies, I., Sosenskaja, T., and Corbett, G. (1999). ‘Colours in Tsakhur: First Account of the Basic Colour Terms of a Nakh-Daghestanian Language’, Linguistic Typology 3: 179–207.Find this resource:

Davies, W., and Dubinsky, S. (2004). A Grammar of Raising and Control. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Davis, P. W., and Saunders, R. (1997). A Grammar of Bella Coola. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.Find this resource:

Dawkins, R. (2004). The Ancestor's Tale. London: Phoenix.Find this resource:

de Haan, F. (2005). ‘Modality in Slavic and Semantic Maps’, in B. Hansen and P. Karlik (eds.), Modality in Slavonic Languages: New Perspectives. Munich: Sagner, 3–24.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Typological Approaches to Modality’, in Frawley (2006: 27–69).Find this resource:

Delancey, S. (1981). ‘An Interpretation of Split Ergativity and Related Patterns’, Language 57: 626–57.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information’, Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.Find this resource:

de Leon, L. (2001). ‘The Acquisition of Verticality in Tzotzil’, in M. Bowerman and S. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 544–65.Find this resource:

Dell, F., and Elmedlaoui, M. (1985). ‘Syllabic Consonants and Syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber’, Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7: 105–30.Find this resource:

De Mauro, T., and Formigari, L. (eds.) (1990). Leibniz, Humboldt, and the Origins of Comparativism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Demuth, K. (1989). ‘Maturation and the Acquisition of the Sesotho Passive’, Language 65: 56–80.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Introduction: Crosslinguistic Perspectives on the Development of Prosodic Words’, Language and Speech 49: 129–35.Find this resource:

—— Machobane, M., Moloi, F., and Odato, C. (2005). ‘Learning Animacy Hierarchy Effects in Sesotho Double Object Applicatives’, Language 81: 421–47.Find this resource:

Dench, A. (1991). ‘Panyjima’, in R. M. W. Dixon and B. J. Blake (eds.), Handbook of Australian Languages, vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 124–243.Find this resource:

Derbyshire, D. (1977). ‘Word Order Universals and the Existence of OVS Languages’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 590–9. Dictionnaire Cambodgien (1938). Phnom Penh: Institut Buddhique.Find this resource:

Diessel, H. (1999). Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Dik, S. (1997). The Theory of Functional Grammar, pt. 1: The Structure of the Clause, ed. K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Di Sciullo, A. (ed.) (2003). Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

(p. 681) Dixon, R. M. W. (1972). The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1977). ‘Where Have All the Adjectives Gone?’, Studies in Language 1: 19–80.Find this resource:

—— (1979a). ‘Corrections and Comments Concerning Heath's “Is Dyirbal Ergative?”’, Linguistics 17: 1003–15.Find this resource:

—— (1979b). ‘Ergativity’, Language 55: 59–138.Find this resource:

—— (1982). Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? And Other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— (1986). ‘Noun Classes and Noun Classification in Typological Perspective’, in C. Craig (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 106–12.Find this resource:

—— (1988). A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— (1991). Words of Our Country. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Find this resource:

—— (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘Complement Clauses and Complementation Strategies’, in F. R. Palmer (ed.), Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honour of Sir John Lyons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 175–220.Find this resource:

—— (1997). The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘A Typology of Causatives: Form, Syntax and Meaning’, in Dixon and Aikhenvald (2000: 30–83).Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Adjective Classes in Typological Perspective’, in Dixon and Aikhenvald (2004: 1–49).Find this resource:

—— (2009). Basic Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (1997). ‘A Typology of Argument-Determined Constructions’, in J. Bybee, J. Haiman, and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givon. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 71–113.Find this resource:

—— —— (1999). ‘Introduction’, in R. M. W. Dixon and A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–21.Find this resource:

—— —— (eds.) (2000). Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— —— (eds.) (2002). Word: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— —— (eds.) (2004). Adjective Classes: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Donohue, M. (1999). Warembori. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

—— (2008). ‘Semantic Alignment Systems: What's What, and What's Not’, in Donohue and Wichmann (2008: 24–75).Find this resource:

—— and Brown, L. (1999). ‘Ergativity: Some Additions from Indonesia’, Australian Journal of Linguistics 19: 57–76.Find this resource:

—— and Maclachlan, A. (1999). ‘What Agreement in Chamorro?’, in C. Smallwood and C. Kitto (eds.), Proceedings of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association VI (Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 16.2). Toronto, ON: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Toronto, 121–32.Find this resource:

—— and Wichmann, S. (eds.) (2008). The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dougherty, J. (1978). ‘Salience and Relativity in Classification’, American Ethnologist 5: 66–80.Find this resource:

Doughty, C. (1991). ‘Second Language Instruction Does Make a Difference: Evidence from an Empirical Study on Second Language Relativization’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 341–69.Find this resource:

(p. 682) Doughty, C., and Long, M. H. (eds.) (2003). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Find this resource:

—— (1991). ‘Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection’, Language 67: 547–619.Find this resource:

Dressler, W. U. (1990). ‘The Cognitive Perspective of “Naturalist” Linguistic Models’, Cognitive Linguistics 1: 75–98.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘Universals, Typology, and Modularity in Natural Morphology’, in R. Hickey and S. Puppel (eds.), Language History and Linguistic Modelling. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1399–1421.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Naturalness and Morphological Change’, in B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 461–71.Find this resource:

—— Mayerthaler, W., Pangl, O., and Wurzel, W. U. (1987). Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Dryer, M. S. (1986). ‘Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative’, Language 62: 808–45.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘Object-Verb Order and Adjective-Noun Order: Dispelling a Myth’, Lingua 74: 185–217.Find this resource:

—— (1989). ‘Large Linguistic Areas and Language Sampling’, Studies in Language 13: 257–92.Find this resource:

—— (1991). ‘SVO Languages and the OV:VO Typology’, Journal of Linguistics 27: 443–82.Find this resource:

—— (1992). ‘The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations’, Language 68: 81–138.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘Frequency and Pragmatically Unmarked Word Order’, in P. Downing and M. Noonan (eds.), Word Order in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 105–35.Find this resource:

—— (1996). ‘Grammatical Relations in Ktunaxa (Kutenai)’, The Belcourt Lecture Delivered before the University of Manitoba on 24 February 1995. Winnipeg: Voices of Rupert's Land. Available at: http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/dryer.htmFind this resource:

—— (1997a). ‘Are Grammatical Relations Universal?’, in J. Bybee, J. Haiman, and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type Dedicated to T. Givon. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 117–43.Find this resource:

—— (1997b). ‘On the Six-Way Word Order Typology’, Studies in Language 21: 69–103.Find this resource:

—— (1997c). ‘Why Statistical Universals Are Better than Absolute Universals’, Chicago Linguistic Society 33: 123–45.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘What Is Basic Linguistic Theory?’ Available at: http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/bltFind this resource:

—— (2002a). ‘Case Distinctions, Rich Verb Agreement, and Word Order Type’, Theoretical Linguistics 28: 151–7.Find this resource:

—— (2002b). ‘Minute Details, the Big Picture, and Joseph Greenberg’, Linguistic Typology 6: 16–18.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Significant and Non-significant Implicational Universals’, Linguistic Typology 7: 108–28.Find this resource:

—— (2005a). ‘Coding of Nominal Plurality’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 138–41).Find this resource:

—— (2005b). ‘Determining Dominant Word Order’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 371).Find this resource:

—— (2005c). ‘Order of Adjective and Noun’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 354–7).Find this resource:

—— (2005d). ‘Order of Genitive and Noun’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 350–53).Find this resource:

—— (2005e). ‘Order of Subject, Object, and Verb’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 330–33).Find this resource:

—— (2005f). ‘The Position of Case Affixes’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 210–12).Find this resource:

—— (2005g). ‘Position of Interrogative Phrases in Content Questions’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 378–81).Find this resource:

(p. 683) —— (2005h). ‘Position of Polar Question Particles’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 374–7).Find this resource:

—— (2005i). ‘Relationship between the Order of Object and Verb and the Order of Relative Clause and Noun’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 390–93).Find this resource:

—— (2006a). ‘Descriptive Theories, Explanatory Theories, and Basic Linguistic Theory’, in F. K. Ameka, A. Dench, and N. Evans (eds.), Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 207–34.Find this resource:

—— (2006b). ‘Functionalism and the Theory-Metalanguage Confusion’, in G. Wiebe, G. Libben, T. Priestly, R. Smyth, and S. Wang (eds.), Phonology, Morphology, and the Empirical Imperative: Papers in Honour of Bruce Derwing. Taipei: Crane Publishing Company, 27–59.Find this resource:

—— (2006c). ‘Functionalism and the Metalanguage-Theory Confusion’. Available at: http://wings.buffalo.edu/socsci/linguistics/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/dryer.htmFind this resource:

Dubinsky, S. (1990). ‘Japanese Direct Object to Indirect Object Demotion’, in P. M. Postal and B. D. Joseph (eds.), Studies in Relational Grammar 3. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 49–86.Find this resource:

DuBois, J. W. (1980). ‘Beyond Definiteness: The Trace of Identity in Discourse’, in W. L. Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 203–74.Find this resource:

—— (1985). ‘Competing Motivations’, in J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 343–66.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘The Discourse Basis of Ergativity’, Language 63: 805–55.Find this resource:

—— Kumpf, L. E., and Ashby, W. J. (eds.) (2003). Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Du Feu, V. (1996). Rapanui. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Dunkel, G. (1981). ‘Typology Versus Reconstruction’, in Y. Arbeitman and A. Bomhard (eds.), Bono Homini Donum: Essays in Historical Linguistics in Honor of J. Alexander Kerns. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 559–69.Find this resource:

Dunn, M. J. (1999). ‘A Grammar of Chukchi’, Ph.D. diss., Australian National University.Find this resource:

Durie, M. (1985). A Grammar of Acehnese. Dordrecht: Foris.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘Grammatical Relations in Acehnese’, Studies in Language 11: 365–99.Find this resource:

DuŠKOVÁ,L. (1969). ‘On Sources of Errors in Foreign Language Learning’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 8: 11–37.Find this resource:

Eastman, C. (1978). Linguistic Theory and Language Description. Philadelphia, PA: Lippin-cott.Find this resource:

Eckman, F. (1977). ‘Markedness and the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis’, Language Learning 27: 315–30.Find this resource:

—— (1981a). ‘On Predicting Phonological Difficulty in Second Language Acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 4: 18–30.Find this resource:

—— (1981b). ‘On the Naturalness of Interlanguage Phonological Rules’, Language Learning 31: 195–216.Find this resource:

—— (1991). ‘The Structural Conformity Hypothesis and the Acquisition of Consonant Clusters in the Interlanguage of ESL Learners’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 23–41.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘From Phonemic Differences to Constraint Rankings: Research on Second Language Phonology’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26: 513–49.Find this resource:

—— Bell, L., and Nelson, D. (1988). ‘On the Generalization of Relative Clause Instruction in the Acquisition of English as a Second Language’, Applied Linguistics 9: 1–20.Find this resource:

(p. 684) Eckman, F., and Iverson, G. (1994). ‘Pronunciation Difficulties in ESL: Coda Consonants in English Interlanguage’, in M. Yavas (eds.), First and Second Language Phonology. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing, 251–66.Find this resource:

—— Moravcsik, E., and Wirth, J. (1989). ‘Implicational Universals and Interrogative Structures in the Interlanguage of ESL Learners’, Language Learning 39: 173–205.Find this resource:

Edwards, J., and Beckman, M. (2008). ‘Some Cross-linguistic Evidence for Modulation of Implicational Universals by Language-Specific Frequency Effects in Phonological Development’, Language Learning and Development 4: 122–56.Find this resource:

Eggers, S., Langendoen, T., and Lewis, W. (2004). ‘The GOLD Ontology’, E-MELD Language Documentation Conference 2004: Workshop on Linguistic Databases and Best Practice, Wayne State University, Detroit, 15–18 July.Find this resource:

Elliott, J. R. (2000). ‘Realis and Irrealis: Forms and Concepts of the Grammaticalization of Reality’, Linguistic Typology 4: 55–90.Find this resource:

Enfield, N. (2003). Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge Curzon.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Areal Linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia’, Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.Find this resource:

—— Majid, A., and van Staden, M. (2006). ‘Cross-linguistic Categorisation of the Body: Introduction’, Language Sciences 28.2–3: 137–47.Find this resource:

England, N. C. (1983). A Grammar of Mam, a Mayan Language. Austin: University of Texas Press.Find this resource:

Epps, P. (2007). ‘Birth of a Noun Classification System: The Case of Hup’, in L. Wetzels (eds.), Language Endangerment and Endangered Languages: Linguistic and Anthropological Studies with Special Emphasis on the Languages and Cultures of the Andean-Amazonian Border Area. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), 107–28.Find this resource:

—— (2008). A Grammar of Hup. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Ernst, T. (2002). The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Essegbey, J. (2008). ‘Intransitive Verbs in Ewe and the Unaccusativity Hypothesis’, in Bowerman and Brown (2008a: 213–30).Find this resource:

Evans, N. (1992). ‘Multiple Semiotic Systems, Hyperpolysemy, and the Reconstruction of Semantic Change in Australian Languages’, in G. Kellermann and M. Morrissey (eds.), Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition. Frankfurt: Lang, 475–508.Find this resource:

—— (1994). ‘Semantic Primitives in Kayardild’, in C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka (eds.), Lexical Universals and Semantic Primitives. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 203–28.Find this resource:

—— (1995). A Grammar of Kayardild, with Historical-Comparative Notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘Role or Cast? Noun Incorporation and Complex Predicates in Mayali’, in A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, and P. Sells (eds.), Complex Predicates. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 397–430.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘The True Status of Grammatical Object Affixes: Evidence from Bininj Gun-wok’, in N. Evans and H.-J. Sasse (eds.), Problems of Polysynthesis. Berlin: Akademie, 15–50.Find this resource:

—— (2003a). ‘Context, Culture, and Structuration in the Languages of Australia’, Annual Review ofAnthropology 32: 13–40.Find this resource:

—— (2003b). ‘Typologies of Agreement: Some Problems from Kayardild’, Transactions of the Philological Society 101: 203–34.Find this resource:

—— (2007a). ‘Standing Up Your Mind: Remembering in Dalabon’, in M. Amberber (ed.), The Semantics of Memory and Forgetting. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 67–95.Find this resource:

(p. 685) —— (2007b). ‘Warramurrungunji Undone: Australian Languages in the 51st Millenium’, in P. Austin and A. Simpson (eds.), Endangered Languages. Hamburg: Buske, 19–44.Find this resource:

—— and Levinson, S. C. (2009). ‘The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and Its Importance for Cognitive Science’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–48.Find this resource:

—— and Osada, T. (2005). ‘Mundari: The Myth of a Language Without Word Classes’, Linguistic Typology 9: 351–90.Find this resource:

—— and Wilkins, D. (2000). ‘In the Mind's Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages’, Language 76: 546–92.Find this resource:

Evans, R., and Gazdar, G. (1996). ‘DATR: A Language for Lexical Knowledge Representation’, Computational Linguistics 22: 167–216.Find this resource:

Everett, D. L. (1986). ‘Pirahã’, in D. C. Derbyshire and G. K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 200–325.Find this resource:

—— and Kern, B. (1997). Wari. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

EythÓRSSON, T., and BarĐDAL, J. (2005). ‘Oblique Subjects: A Common Germanic Inheritance’, Language 81.4: 824–81.Find this resource:

Faarlund, J. T. (1998). ‘Symetrie et dissymetrie des actants centraux’, in Feuillet (1998:147–92).Find this resource:

Facundes, S. (2000). ‘The Language of the Apurina People of Brazil’, Ph.D. diss., State University of New York at Buffalo.Find this resource:

Falk, Y. N. (1991). ‘Causativization’, Journal of Linguistics 27: 55–79.Find this resource:

Faltz, L. (1995). ‘Towards a Typology of Natural Logic’, in Bach et al. (1995: 271–320).Find this resource:

—— (1998). The Navajo Verb. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Find this resource:

Farrell, P. (2005). Grammatical Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— Marlett, S. A., and Perlmutter, D. M. (1991). ‘Notions of Subjecthood and Switch Reference: Evidence from Seri’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 431–56.Find this resource:

Ferguson, C., and Farwell, C. (1975). ‘Words and Sounds in Early Language Acquisition’, Language 51: 419–39.Find this resource:

Feuillet, J. (ed.) (1998). Actance et valence dans les langues de l'Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Filimonova, E. (2005). ‘The Noun Phrase Hierarchy and Relational Marking: Problems and Counterevidence’, Linguistic Typology 9: 77–113.Find this resource:

—— Plank, F., and Mayer, T. (1996–2001). The Universals Archive. Available at: http://typo.unikonstanz.de/archive/intro/index.phpFind this resource:

Fillmore, C. (1968). ‘The Case for Case’, in E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1–88.Find this resource:

Finck, F. N. (1901). Die Klassification der Sprachen. Marburg: Elwert.Find this resource:

—— (1907). ‘Der angeblich Passivische Charakter des Transitiven Verbs’, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 41: 209–82.Find this resource:

—— (1910). Die Haupttypen des Sprachbaus. Leipzig: Teubner.Find this resource:

Fisher, C., and Gleitman, L. (2002). ‘Language Acquisition’, in H. Pashler and R. Gallistel (eds.), Stevens Handbook of Experimental Psychology, vol. 3. New York: Wiley, 445–96.Find this resource:

Fleischman, S. (1982). The Future in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1989). ‘Temporal Distance: A Basic Linguistic Metaphor’, Studies in Language 13: 1–51.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘Imperfective and Irrealis’, in Bybee and Fleischman (1995: 519–51).Find this resource:

Fodor, J. D. (1983). ‘Phrase Structure Parsing and the Island Constraints’, Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 163–223.Find this resource:

(p. 686) Foley, W. A. (1986). The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1997). Anthropological Linguistics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Symmetrical Voice System and Precategoriality in Philippine Languages’, paper presented at the Workshop on Voice and Grammatical Functions in Austronesian Languages, University of Queensland, 1 July. Available at: http://www.sultry.arts.usyd.edu.au/LFG98/austro/workshop.htmFind this resource:

—— and Van Valin, R. D., Jr. (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Forchheimer, P. (1953). The Category of Person in Language. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Ford, M. (1983). ‘A Method of Obtaining Measures of Local Parsing Complexity throughout Sentences’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 203–18.Find this resource:

Fortescue, M. (1984). West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Fortson, B. (2004). Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Fox, A. (1995). Linguistic Reconstruction: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fox, B. (1987). ‘The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy Reinterpreted: Subject Primacy or the Absolutive Hypothesis?’, Language 63: 856–70.Find this resource:

Fox, J. (1977). ‘Roman Jakobson and the Comparative Study of Parallelism’, in C. H. van Schooneveld and D. Armstrong (eds.), Roman Jakobson: Echoes of His Scholarship. Lisse: de Ridder Press, 59–90.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1988). To Speak in Pairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Frajzyngier, Z., and Shay, E. (2003). Explaining Language Structure through Systems Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Franchetto, B. (2006). ‘Ethnography in Language Documentation’, in Gippert et al. (2006: 183–212).Find this resource:

Frantz, D. G. (1973). ‘On Question Word Movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 4: 531–4.Find this resource:

Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (2006). The Expression of Modality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Friedrich, P. (1975). Proto-Indo-European Syntax: The Order of Meaningful Elements. Butte, MT: Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology.Find this resource:

Gabelentz, G. von der (1869). ‘Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax’, Zeitschrift fur Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 6: 376–84.Find this resource:

—— (1874–75). ‘Weiteres zur vergleichenden Syntax-Wort- und Satzstellung’, Zeitschrift fur Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 8: 129–65, 300–38.Find this resource:

—— (1891). Die Sprachwissenschaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.Find this resource:

—— (1894). ‘Hypologie [sic] der Sprachen, eine neue Aufgabe der Linguistik’, Indogerma-nische Forschungen 4: 1–7.Find this resource:

—— (1901 [1891]). Die Sprachwissenschaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. 2nd edn. Leipzig: Tauchnitz. (Ed. G. Narr and U. Petersen, with an essay by E. Coseriu. Tubingen: TBL, 1972.)Find this resource:

Gair, J. W. (1990). ‘Subjects, Cases and INFL in Sinhala’, in Verma and Mohanan (1990:13–41).Find this resource:

Gamkrelidze, T., and Ivanov, V. (1973). ‘Sprachtypologie und die Rekonstruktion der Gemeinindogermanischen Verschlüsse’, Phonetica 27: 150–56.Find this resource:

(p. 687) —— —— (1995) Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans, trans. J. Nichols. 2 vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

GarcÍA, E., and van Putte, F. (1989). ‘Forms Are Silver, Nothing Is Gold’, Folia Linguistica Historica 8.1–2: 365–84.Find this resource:

Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Garrett, A. (1990). ‘The Origin of NP Split Ergativity’, Language 66: 261–96.Find this resource:

Garvin, P. (1948). ‘Kutenai III: Morpheme Distributions (Prefix, Theme, Suffix)’, International Journal of American Linguistics 14: 171–87.Find this resource:

Gass, S. (1979). ‘Language Transfer and Universal Grammatical Relations’, Language Learning 29: 327–45.Find this resource:

—— (1982). ‘From Theory to Practice’, in J. Hines and W. Rutherford (eds.), On TESOL 81. Washington, DC: TESOL, 129–40.Find this resource:

Gathercole, V., and Min, H. (1997). ‘Word Meaning Biases or Language-Specific Effects? Evidence from English, Spanish and Korean’, First Language 17: 31–56.Find this resource:

Geeraerts, D. (1989). ‘Introduction: Prospects and Problems of Prototype Theory’, Linguistics 27: 587–612.Find this resource:

Geertz, C. (1973). ‘Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture’, in C. Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, 3–30.Find this resource:

Gell-Mann, M. (1992). ‘Complexity and Complex Adaptive Systems’, in J. A. Hawkins and M. Gell-Mann (eds.), The Evolution of Human Languages. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, 3–18.Find this resource:

Geniusien E. E. (1987). The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Gensini, S. (1990). ‘“Vulgaris opinio babelica”: sui fondamenti storico-teorici della plur-alità delle lingue nel pensiero di Leibniz’, in De Mauro and Formigari (1990: 61–83).Find this resource:

Gensler, O. (1993). ‘A Typological Evaluation of Celtic/Hamito-Semitic Syntactic Parallels’, Ph.D. diss., University of California at Berkeley.Find this resource:

Gentner, D., and Boroditsky, L. (2001). ‘Individuation, Relativity, and Early Word Learning’, in M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 215–56.Find this resource:

—— and Bowerman, M. (2009). ‘Why Some Spatial Semantic Categories are Harder to Learn than Others: The Typological Prevalence Hypothesis’, in Guo et al. (2009: 465–80).Find this resource:

Gerdts, D. B. (1988). Object and Absolutive in Halkomelem Salish. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Ghomeshi, J., Jackendoff, R., Rosen, N., and Russell, K. (2004). ‘Contrastive Focus Reduplication in English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 307–57.Find this resource:

Giacalone Ramat, A. (ed.) (2003). Typology and Second Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Gibson, E. (1998). ‘Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies’, Cognition 68: 1–76.Find this resource:

Gil, D. (2001). ‘Escaping Eurocentrism’, in P. Newman and M. Ratliff (eds.), Linguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 102–32.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Riau Indonesian sama: Explorations in Macrofunctionality’, in M. Haspelmath (ed.), Co-ordinating Constructions. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 371–424.Find this resource:

Gildea, S. (1992). ‘Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax: On the Genesis of Ergativity in Independent Clauses’, Ph.D. diss., University of Oregon.Find this resource:

Gippert, J., Himmelmann, N. P., and Mosel, U. (eds.) (2006). Essentials of Language Documentation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

(p. 688) Girard, G. (1747). Les Vrais principes de la langue frangaise. Paris: Mercier. (Repr., with an introduction by P. Swiggers. Geneva-Paris: Droz, 1982.)Find this resource:

Givon, T. (1971). ‘Historical Syntax and Synchronic Morphology: An Archaeologist's Field Trip’, Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 394–415.Find this resource:

—— (1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—— (1981). ‘Logic vs. Pragmatics, with Natural Languages as the Referee’, Journal of Pragmatics 6: 81–133.Find this resource:

—— (1982). ‘Transitivity, Topicality, and the Ute Impersonal Passive’, in Hopper and Thompson (1982a: 143–60).Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1983). Topic Continuity in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (1985). ‘Iconicity, Isomorphism, and Non-arbitrary Coding’, in J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 187–219.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1994a). Voice and Inversion. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (1994b). ‘The Pragmatics of De-transitive Voice: Functional and Typological Aspects of Inversion’, in Givón (1994a: 3–44).Find this resource:

—— (1995). Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (2001). Syntax: An Introduction. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (2002). Bio-linguistics: The Santa Barbara Lectures. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— and Malle, B. F. (eds.) (2002). The Evolution of Language out of Pre-language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gleitman, L. (1990). ‘The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings’, Language Acquisition 1: 3–55.Find this resource:

Glidden, S. H. (1985). ‘The Koh Verbal System’, Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota 29: 223–82.Find this resource:

Goddard, C. (1998). Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Wierzbicka, A. (eds.) (2002). Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Goedemans, R. W. N. (1996). ‘Syllable Weight and Prominence’, in Goedemans et al. (1996: 115–64).Find this resource:

—— van der Hulst, H. G., and van zanten, E. (eds.) (2009). A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— —— and Visch, E. A. M. (1996). Stress Patterns of the World, Pt. 1: Background. The Hague: HIL Publications, Holland Academic Graphics. (See also: http:/stresstyp.leidenuniv.nl/)Find this resource:

Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Gooch, A. (1970). Diminutive, Augmentative, and Pejorative Suffixes in Modern Spanish. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Find this resource:

Gordon, M., and Applebaum, A. (2006). ‘Phonetic Structures of Turkish Kabardian’, Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36: 159–86.Find this resource:

Gordon, R. G., Jr. (ed.) (2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 15th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Available at: http://www.ethnologue.comFind this resource:

Gorgoniev, Y. (1966). Grammatika kxmerskogo jazyka. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.Find this resource:

Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N. (1993). ‘Punctuated Equilibrium Comes of Age’, Nature 366: 223–7.Find this resource:

Gowlett, D. (2003). ‘Zone S’, in D. Nurse and G. Philippson (eds.), The Bantu Languages. London: Routledge, 609–38.Find this resource:

Grabe, E., and Low, E. L. (2002). ‘Durational Variability in Speech and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis’, in C. Gussenhoven and N. Warner (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 377–401.Find this resource:

(p. 689) Gradman, H. (1971). ‘Limitations of Contrastive Analysis Predictions’, Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 11–15.Find this resource:

Graffi, G. (2001). 200 Years of Syntax: A Critical Survey. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Grasserie, R. de la (1889–90). ‘De la classification des langues’, Internationale Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 4: 374–87Find this resource:

;

5: 296–338.Find this resource:

Greenberg, J. H. (1954). ‘A Quantitative Approach to the Morphological Typology of Language’, in R. Spencer (ed.), Method and Perspective in Anthropology. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 192–220Find this resource:

.

(Repr.in International Journal of American Linguistics 26 (1960): 178–94.)Find this resource:

—— (1957). ‘Order of Affixing: A Study in General Linguistics’, in J. H. Greenberg, Essays in Linguistics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 86–94.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1963a). Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1963b). ‘Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements’, in Greenberg (1963a: 58–90).Find this resource:

—— (1966a). Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— (1966c). ‘Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements’, in Greenberg (1966b: 73–113).Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1966b[1963J). Universals of Language. 2nd rev. edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (1974). Language Typology: A Historical and Analytic Overview. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— (1978a). ‘Diachrony, Synchrony and Language Universals’, in J. H. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 3. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 61–91.Find this resource:

—— (1978b). ‘How Does a Language Acquire Gender Markers?’, in J. H. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 3. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 47–82.Find this resource:

—— (1978c). ‘Some Generalizations Concerning Initial and Final Consonant Clusters’, in Greenberg et al. (1978: 243–279).Find this resource:

—— (1986). ‘On Being a Linguistic Anthropologist’, Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 1–24.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘The Diachronic Typological Approach to Language’, in Shibatani and Bynon (1995: 145–66).Find this resource:

—— (2000). Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives, vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

—— Ferguson, C., and Moravcsik, E. A. (eds.) (1978). Universals of Human Language, vol. 2: Phonology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

—— Osgood, C. E., and Jenkins, J. J. (1966 [1963]). ‘Memorandum Concerning Language Universals’, in Greenberg (1966b: xv–xxvii).Find this resource:

Gregores, E., and SuÁREZ, J. A. (1967). A Description of Colloquial Guaraní The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

Grice, P. (1975). ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.Find this resource:

Grinevald, C. (2000). ‘A Morphosyntactic Typology of Classifiers’, in G. Senft (ed.), Systems of Nominal Classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 50–92.Find this resource:

(p. 690) Grinevald, C. (2002). ‘Making Sense of Nominal Classification Systems: Noun Classifiers and the Grammaticalization Variable’, in I. Wischer and G. Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 259–75.Find this resource:

—— and Seifart, F. (2004). ‘Noun Classes in African and Amazonian Languages: Towards a Comparison’, Linguistic Typology 8: 243–85.Find this resource:

Groves, T. R., Groves, G. W., and Jacobs, R. (1985). Kiribatese: An Outline Description. Canberra: Australian National University.Find this resource:

Guirardello, R. (1999). ‘A Reference Grammar of Trumai’, Ph.D. diss., Rice University.Find this resource:

Gumperz, J. J., and Wilson, R. (1971). ‘Convergence and Creolization: A Case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian Border’, in D. Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151–68.Find this resource:

Gundel, J. K. (1988). ‘Universals of Topic-Comment Structure’, in M. Hammond, E. Moravcsik, and J. R. Wirth (eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 209–39.Find this resource:

Guo, J., Lieven, E., Ervin-Tripp, S., Budwig, N., Özçalişkan, S., and Nakamura, K. (eds.) (2009). The Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. New York: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Haarman, H. (1976). Aspekte der Arealtypologie: Die problematik der Europaischen Sprachbünde. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

HagÈGE, C. (1974). ‘Les Pronoms logophoriques’, Bulletin de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris 69: 287–310.Find this resource:

—— (1993). The Language Builder. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Haggblade, H. (1983). ‘Contributors to the Beginnings of Language Typology’, Historio-graphia Linguistica 10: 13–24.Find this resource:

Haider, H. (1985). ‘The Fallacy of Typology: Remarks on the PIE Stop System’, Lingua 65: 1–27.Find this resource:

Haig, G. (2001). ‘Linguistic Diffusion in Present-Day Anatolia: From Top to Bottom’, in Aikhenvald and Dixon (2001: 195–224).Find this resource:

Haiman, J. (1971). ‘Targets and Paradigmatic Borrowing in Romantsch’, Language 47: 797–808.Find this resource:

—— (1980). Hua: A Papuan Language of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (1983). ‘Iconic and Economic Motivation’, Language 59: 781–819.Find this resource:

—— (1985). Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1994). ‘Ritualization and the Development of Language’, in Pagliuca (1994: 3–28).Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Hua (Papuan)’, in A. Spencer and A. Zwicky (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 537–62.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Action, Speech, and Grammar’, in M. Nanny and O. Fischer (eds.), Form Miming Meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 37–57.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Explaining Infixation’, in J. Moore and M. Polinsky (eds.), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 105–20.Find this resource:

Hajek, J. (2007). ‘Sound Systems of the Asia-Pacific: Some Basic Typological Observations’, in P. Austin and A. Simpson (eds.), Endangered Languages. Hamburg: Buske, 206–22.Find this resource:

Hale, K. (1983). ‘Warlpiri and the Grammar of Nonconfigurational Languages’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5–47.Find this resource:

(p. 691) —— Krauss, M., Watahomigie, L. J., Yamamoto, A. Y., Craig, C., Jeanne, L. M., and England, N. C. (1992). ‘Endangered Languages’, Language 68: 1–42.Find this resource:

Hale, W. G., and Buck, C. D. (1903). A Latin Grammar. Boston, MA: Ginn.Find this resource:

Hall, C. (1992). Morphology and Mind: A Unified Approach to Explanation in Linguistics. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Hamp, E. (1989). ‘The Indo-European Obstruent Features and Phonotactic Constraints’, in T. Vennemann (ed.), The New Sound of Indo-European: Essays in Phonological Reconstruction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 209–14.Find this resource:

Hardin, C. L., and Maffi, L. (eds.) (1997). Color Categories in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Harris, A. C. (1984). ‘Georgian’, in W. S. Chisholm, Jr. (ed.), Interrogativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 63–112.Find this resource:

—— and Campbell, L. (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Harrison, S. P. (1978). ‘Transitive Marking in Micronesian Languages’, in S. A. Wurm and L. Carrington (eds.), Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 1067–1124.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, M. (1987). Transitivity Alternations of the Anticausative Type. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Find this resource:

—— (1990). ‘The Grammaticalization of Passive Morphology’, Studies in Language 14: 25–71.Find this resource:

—— (1993a). A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (1993b). ‘More on the Typology of Inchoative/Causative Verb Alternations’, in Comrie and Polinsky (1993: 87–120).Find this resource:

—— (1997). Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘How Young Is Standard Average European?’, Language Sciences 20: 271–87.Find this resource:

—— (1999a). ‘External Possession in a European Areal Perspective’, in Payne and Barshi (1999: 109–35).Find this resource:

—— (1999b). ‘Optimality and Diachronic Adaptation’, Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft 18.2: 180–205.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘The European Linguistic Area: Standard Average European’, in Haspelmath et al. (2001: 1492–1510).Find this resource:

—— (2002). Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning: Semantic Maps and Cross-linguistic Comparison’, in Tomasello (2003b: 211–42).Find this resource:

—— (2004a). ‘Co-ordinating Constructions: An Overview’, in M. Haspelmath (ed.), Co-ordinating Constructions. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–39.Find this resource:

—— (2004b). ‘Does Linguistic Explanation Presuppose Linguistic Description?’, Studies in Language 28: 554–79.Find this resource:

—— (2004c). ‘Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: AUsage-Based Account’, Constructions 2: 1–71.Find this resource:

—— (2005a). ‘Ditransitive Constructions: The Verb “Give”’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 426–9).Find this resource:

—— (2005b). ‘Argument Marking in Ditransitive Alignment Types’, Linguistic Discovery 3: 1–21.Find this resource:

—— (2005c). ‘Argument Marking in Ditransitive Alignment Types’, Linguistic Discovery 3. Available at: http://linguistic-discovery.dartmouth.eduFind this resource:

(p. 692) Haspelmath, M. (2006). ‘Against Markedness (and What to Replace it With)’, Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Pre-established Categories Don't Exist: Consequences for Language Description and Typology’, Linguistic Typology 11: 119–32.Find this resource:

—— (2008a). ‘Parametric versus Functional Explanations of Syntactic Universals’, in T. Biberauer (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 75–107.Find this resource:

—— (2008b). ‘Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Cross-linguistic Studies’. MS. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Typology. Available at: http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/staff/haspelmath/papers.phpFind this resource:

—— (2009). ‘Usage Frequency Effects in Ditransitive Constructions’, lecture handout, LSA Linguistic Institute, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

—— (forthcoming). ‘Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Cross-linguistic Studies’.Find this resource:

—— Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., and Comrie, B. (eds.) (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— König, E., Oesterreicher, W., and Raible, W. (eds.) (2001). Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook. 2 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— Müller-Bardey, T. (2004). ‘Valency Change’, in G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1130–45.Find this resource:

—— and Tadmor, U. (eds.) (2009). Lexical Borrowability. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Haub, C. (1995). ‘How Many People Have Ever Lived On Earth?’, Population Today, 5 February 1–2.Find this resource:

Haude, K. (2006). ‘A Grammar of Movima’, Ph.D. diss., Radboud University.Find this resource:

Haudry, J. (1977). L'emploi des cas en védique: introduction à lʼétude des cas en indo-européen. Lyon: Éditions l'Hermès.Find this resource:

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. (2002). ‘The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?’, Science 298: 1569–79.Find this resource:

Hawkins, J. A. (1979). ‘Implicational Universals as Predictors of Word Order Change’, Language 55: 618–48.Find this resource:

—— (1980). ‘On Implicational and Distributional Universals of Word Order’, Journal of Linguistics 16: 193–235.Find this resource:

—— (1983). Word Order Universals. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘Implicational Universals as Predictors of Language Acquisition’, Linguistics 25: 453–73.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1988). Explaining Language Universals. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

—— (1990). ‘A Parsing Theory of Word Order Universals’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 223–61.Find this resource:

—— (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Morphological Hierarchies in the History of Germanic’, International Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 3: 197–217.Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies across Grammars’, Language 75: 244–85.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘Symmetries and Asymmetries: Their Grammar, Typology and Parsing’, Theoretical Linguistics 28: 95–149.Find this resource:

—— (2004). Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 693) —— and Gilligan, G. (1988). ‘Prefixing and Suffixing Universals in Relation to Basic Word Order’, Lingua 74: 219–59.Find this resource:

Hay, J. (2001). ‘Lexical Frequency in Morphology: Is Everything Relative?’ Linguistics 39: 1041–70.Find this resource:

Hayes, B. (1999). ‘Phonetically-Driven Phonology: The Role of Optimality Theory and Grounding’, in M. Darnell, E. Moravscik, M. Noonan, F. Newmeyer, and K. Wheatley (eds.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. 1: General Papers. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 243–85.Find this resource:

Heath, J. (1980). Functional Grammar of Nunngubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Find this resource:

Heine, B. (2003). ‘Grammaticalization’, in B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 575–601.Find this resource:

—— Claudi, U., and Hunnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— and Kuteva, T. (2002). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— —— (2005). Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— —— (2007). The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Reh, M. (1984). Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.Find this resource:

Helmbrecht, J. (1996a). ‘On the Grammaticalization of First and Second Person Pronominal Affixes in North American Indian Languages’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 22: 69–77.Find this resource:

—— (1996b). ‘The Syntax of Personal Agreement in East Caucasian Languages’, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 2: 127–48.Find this resource:

Henderson, J. (1995). Phonology and Grammar of Yele, Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Find this resource:

Hengeveld, K. (1992). Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Herrmann, T. (2005). ‘Relative Clauses in English Dialects of the British Isles’, in B. Kortmann, T. Herrmann, L. Pietsch, and S. Wagner (eds.), A Comparative Grammar of English Dialects: Agreement, Gender, Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 21–123.Find this resource:

Hess, S. A. (1998). ‘Pharyngeal Articulations’, Ph.D. diss., UCLA.Find this resource:

Hetzron, R. (1969). The Verbal System of Southern Agaw. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Hewett, H., Singer, R., Dineen, A., Stainsby, D., and Field, R. (2005). Mawng Dictionary. Electronic data file, 2005 version.Find this resource:

Hewitt, G. B. (1979). Abkhaz. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

Hill, J. H. (2006). ‘Writing Culture in Grammar in the Americanist Tradition’, in F. Ameka, A. Dench, and N. Evans (eds.), Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 609–28.Find this resource:

Himmelmann, N. P. (1987). Morphosyntax und Morphologie: Die Ausrichtungsaffixe im Tagalog. Munich: Fink.Find this resource:

—— (1991). The Philippine Challenge to Universal Grammar. Cologne: Department of Linguistics.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Documentary and Descriptive Linguistics’, Linguistics 36: 161–95.Find this resource:

(p. 694) Himmelmann, N. P. (2005). ‘The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological Characteristics’, in K. A. Adelaar and N. P. Himmelmann, Jr. (eds.), The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Routledge, 110–81.Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Language Documentation: What Is It and What Is It Good for?’, in Gippert et al. (2006: 1–30).Find this resource:

—— and Evans, N. (2007). ‘Workshop Proposal’ for the Pre-ALT workshop on Linguistic Typology and Language Documentation, Paris, 24–25 September. Available at: http://www.alt7.cnrs.fr/fr/evenements.htmlFind this resource:

Hinds, J. (1984). ‘Japanese’, in W. S. Chisholm, Jr. (ed.), Interrogativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 145–88.Find this resource:

Hinton, L., Nichols, J., and Ohala, J. (1994). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hirst, D., and Di Cristo, A. (eds.) (1998). Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hirt, H. (1927). Indogermanische Grammatik, vol. 3. Heidelberg: Winter.Find this resource:

Hjelmslev, L. (1961 [1943]). Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Rev. edn. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Find this resource:

(

Translated from Omkring sprogteoriens grundlaiggelse. Copenhagen: Munskgaard.)Find this resource:

—— (1970 [1963]). Language: An Introduction, trans. F. J. Whitfield. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Find this resource:

(

Translated from Sproget: En introduktion. Charlottenlund: Nature Method Center.Find this resource:

)

Hock, H. H. (1991). Principles of Historical Linguistics. 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (1992). ‘Reconstruction and Syntactic Typology: A Plea for a Different Approach’, in G. Davis and G. Iverson (eds.), Explanation in Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 105–21.Find this resource:

—— and Joseph, B. (1996). Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Hockett, C. F. (1966). ‘The Problem of Universals in Language’, in Greenberg (1966b: 1–29).Find this resource:

—— (1993). ‘Direction in the Algonquian Verb: A Correction’, in The Rice Papers, first instalment, June. MS. Rice University.Find this resource:

Hoeksema, J., and Janda, R. (1988). ‘Implications of Process-Morphology for Categorial Grammar’, in R. Oehrle, E. Bach, and D. Wheeler (eds.), Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. Dordrecht: Reidel, 199–249.Find this resource:

Hoekstra, T., and Kooji, J. G. (1988). ‘The Innateness Hypothesis’, in Hawkins (1988: 31–55).Find this resource:

Hoffmann, C. (1903). Mundari Grammar. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.Find this resource:

Holmes, P., and Hinchliffe, I. (1994). Swedish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Holmes, V. M., and O'Regan, J. K. (1981). ‘Eye Fixation Patterns during the Reading of Relative Clause Sentences’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 417–30.Find this resource:

Hongkai, S. (1996). ‘Case Markers of Personal Pronouns in Tibeto-Burman Languages’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 19: 1–14.Find this resource:

Hooper, J. B. (1976). ‘Word Frequency in Lexical Diffusion and the Source of Morpho-phonological Change’, in W. Christie (ed.), Current Progress in Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 96–105.Find this resource:

Hopper, P. J. (1973). ‘Glottalized and Murmured Occlusives in Indo-European’, Glossa 7: 141–66.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1982). Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘Emergent Grammar’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–57.Find this resource:

(p. 695) —— (1990). ‘Where Do Words Come From?’, in W. Croft, C. Kemmer, and K. Denning (eds.), Studies in Typology and Diachrony for Joseph Greenberg. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 151–60.Find this resource:

—— and Thompson, S. A. (1980). ‘Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse’, Language 56: 251–99.Find this resource:

—— —— (eds.) (1982a). Studies in Transitivity: Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—— —— (1982b). ‘Introduction’, in Hopper and Thompson (1982a: 1–5).Find this resource:

—— —— (1984). ‘The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar’, Language 60: 703–52.Find this resource:

—— —— (1985). ‘The Iconicity of the Universal Categories “Noun” and “Verb”’, in J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 151–83.Find this resource:

—— and Traugott, E. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— —— (2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hualde, J. I. (1991). Basque Phonology. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Hubbard, K. (1995). ‘Toward a Theory of Phonological and Phonetic Timing: Evidence from Bantu’, in B. Connell and A. Arvaniti (eds.), Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–187.Find this resource:

Hudson, R. (2007). ‘Towards a Useful Theory of Language’, in Austin et al. (2007: 3–11). Available at: www.hrelp.org/eprints/ldlt_02.pdfFind this resource:

Huisman, R. D. (1973). ‘Angaatha Verb Morphology’, Linguistics 110: 43–54.Find this resource:

Hüllen, W. (2001). ‘Characterization and Evaluation of Languages in the Renaissance and the Early Modern Period’, in Haspelmath et al. (2001: i. 234–49).Find this resource:

Humboldt, W. von (1907 [1830–35]). Uber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprach-baues und ihren Einfluss auf die Geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts, in W. von Humboldts Werke, vol. 7. Berlin: B. Behr's Verlag. (Repr. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1968.)Find this resource:

—— (1933). Gramatica vasca. Unpub. Ger. text (1819–20).Find this resource:

(

Sp. trans. J. Garate, Guillermo de Humboldt: Estudios de sus trabajos sobre vasconia. Bilbao: Imprenta Provincial de Viz-caya.Find this resource:

)

—— (1968 [1836]). Über die verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die Geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. (Repr. Berlin: Dümmler.)Find this resource:

—— (2005 [1826]). ‘Uber den Grammatischen Bau der chinesischen Sprache’, in W. von Humboldt, Grundzuge des sprachlichen Typus. Berlin: Philo, 242–57.Find this resource:

Hume, E. (2000). Metathesis Website. 12 December 2007: http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~ehume/metathesis

Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M., and Knight, C. (ed.) (1998). Approaches to the Evolution ofLanguage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Huson, D. H., and Bryant, D. (2006). ‘Application of Phylogenetic Networks in Evolutionary Studies’, Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 254–67.Find this resource:

Hyams, N. M. (1986). Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Boston: Reidel.Find this resource:

Hyltenstam, K. (1984). ‘The Use of Typological Markedness Conditions as Predictors in Second Language Acquisition: The Case of Pronominal Copies in Relative Clauses’, in R. W. Andersen (ed.), Second Languages: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 39–58.Find this resource:

Hyman, L. M. (1977). ‘On the Nature of Linguistic Stress’, in L. M. Hyman (ed.), Studies in Stress and Accent. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 37–81.Find this resource:

(p. 696) Hyman, L. M. (1984). ‘Form and Substance in Language Universals’, in B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, and Ö. Dahl (eds.), Explanation of Language Universals. Berlin: Mouton, 67–85.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Tone Systems’, in Haspelmath et al. (2001: ii. 1367–79).Find this resource:

Iggesen, O. A. (2005). A World-Wide Typological Study on Lexeme-Class-Dependent Deviations in Morphological Case Inventories. Munich: Lincom.Find this resource:

Imai, M., and Gentner, D. (1997). ‘A Cross-linguistic Study of Early Word Meaning: Universal Ontology and Linguistic Influence’, Cognition 62: 169–200.Find this resource:

Inkelas, S., and Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: Doubling in Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Isacenko, A. V. (1972). ‘Rolʼ usecenija v russkom slovoobrazovanii’, International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 15: 95–125.Find this resource:

Ittmann, J. (1939). Grammatik des Duala. Berlin: Reimer.Find this resource:

Jacobsen, W. H., Jr. (1979). ‘Noun and Verb in Nootkan’, in B. S. Efrat (ed.), The Victoria Conference on Northwestern Languages. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Provincial Museum, 83–155.Find this resource:

Jacobsen, W. M. (1985). ‘Morphosyntactic Transitivity and Semantic Markedness’, in W. H. Eilfort, P. D. Kroeber, and K. L. Peterson (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity at the Twenty-First Regional Meeting of CLS. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 89–104.Find this resource:

Jacquesson, F. (2001). ‘Person-Marking in TB Languages of North-East India’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24: 113–44.Find this resource:

Jaeger, T. F., and Wasow, T. (2005). ‘Production-Complexity Driven Variation: Relativizer Omission in Non-subject-extracted Relative Clauses’, paper presented at the 18th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, Tucson, AZ.Find this resource:

Jäger, G. (2007). ‘Evolutionary Game Theory and Typology: A Case Study’, Language 83: 74–109.Find this resource:

Jakobson, R. (1936). ‘Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre’, Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 240–88.Find this resource:

—— (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Uppsala Universi-tet Arsskrift.Find this resource:

—— (1958). ‘Typological Studies and Their Contribution to Historical Comparative Linguistics’, in E. Siversten, C. H. Borgstrom, A. Gallis, and A. Sommerfelt (eds.), Actes du huitième congrès international des linguistes/Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Linguists. Oslo: Oslo University Press, 17–25.Find this resource:

—— (1960). ‘Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics’, in T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350–77.Find this resource:

—— (1966 [1963]). ‘Language Universals and Linguistics’, in Greenberg (1966b: 263–78).Find this resource:

—— (1968 [1941]). Child Language Aphasia and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— (1971a [1936]). ‘Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der rus-sischen Kasus’Find this resource:

, in Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague. (

Repr. in Roman Jakobson: Selected Writings, vol. 2. The Hague: Mouton, 23–71Find this resource:

).

—— (1971b [1939]). ‘Signe zero’, in Melanges de liguistique offerts a Charles BallyFind this resource:

. (

Repr. In Roman Jakobson: Selected Writings, vol. 2. The Hague: Mouton, 211–19.Find this resource:

)

—— (1971c [1957]). ‘Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb’.Find this resource:

(

Repr. in Roman Jakobson: Selected Writings, vol. 2. The Hague: Mouton, 130–47.Find this resource:

)

—— (1971d [1958]). ‘Boas' View of Grammatical Meaning’.Find this resource:

(

Repr. in Roman Jakobson: Selected Writings, vol. 2. The Hague: Mouton, 98–135.Find this resource:

)

(p. 697) —— (1971e [1958]). ‘Typological Studies and Their Contribution to Historical Comparative Linguistics’.Find this resource:

(

Repr. in Roman Jakobson: Selected Writings, vol. 1. The Hague: Mouton, 523–32.Find this resource:

)

—— (1971f [1962]). ‘Morfologicheskije nabljudenija nad slvjanskim sklonenijem (sostav russkix padezhnyx form)’. (Repr. in Roman Jakobson: Selected Writings, vol. 2. The Hague: Mouton, 154–83.)Find this resource:

—— (1971g [1966]). ‘Quest for the Essence of Language’, Diogenes 51.Find this resource:

(Repr.in

Roman Jakobson: Selected Writings, vol. 2. The Hague: Mouton, 345–59.)Find this resource:

—— Fant, G., and Halle, M. (1952). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— and Halle, M. (1956). Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.Find this resource:

—— and Waugh, L. (1979). The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Find this resource:

James, D. (1982). ‘Past Tense and the Hypothetical: A Cross-linguistic Study’, Studies in Language 6: 375–403.Find this resource:

Janda, R. D., and Joseph, B. D. (2003). ‘On Language, Change, and Language Change—or, Of History, Linguistics, and Historical Linguistics’, in B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 3–180.Find this resource:

Janssen, D. P., Bickel, B., and Zúñiga, F. (2006). ‘Randomization Tests in Language Typology’, Linguistic Typology 10: 419–40.Find this resource:

Jeffers, R. (1976). ‘Review of Proto-Indo-European Syntax, by Winfred Lehmann’, Language 52: 982–8.Find this resource:

—— and Lehiste, I. (1982). Principles and Methods for Historical Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Jelinek, E. (1984). ‘Empty Categories and Non-configurational Languages’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39–76.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘Quantification in Straits Salish’, in Bach et al. (1995: 487–540).Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Prepositions in North Straits Salish and the Noun/Verb Question’, in E. Czaykowska-Higgins and M. D. Kinkade (eds.), Salish Languages and Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 325–46.Find this resource:

Jensen, C. (1990). ‘Cross-referencing Changes in Some Tupi-Guarani Languages’, in D. L. Payne (ed.), Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland American Languages. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 117–58.Find this resource:

jespersen, O. (1924). The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Find this resource:

Job, M. (1995). ‘Did Proto-Indo-European Have Glottalized Stops?’, Diachronica 12: 237–50.Find this resource:

Johanson, L. (2002). Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.Find this resource:

Johnson, K. (2002). ‘Review of Vowels and Consonants, by Peter Ladefoged’, Phonology 19: 1–5.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Decisions and Mechanisms in Exemplar-Based Phonology’, in M.-J. Solé, P. S. Beddor, and M. Ohala (eds.), Experimental Approaches to Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–40.Find this resource:

Johnston, J. R., and Slobin, D. I. (1979). ‘The Development of Locative Expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish’, Journal of Child Language 6: 529–45.Find this resource:

Joseph, B. D. (1985). ‘Proto-Indo-European Consonantism: Methodological and Further Concerns’, in J. Fisiak (ed.), Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 313–22.Find this resource:

(p. 698) Joseph, B. D. (2003). ‘Morphologization from Syntax’, in B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 472–92.Find this resource:

Jun, S.-A. (ed.) (2005). Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Jurafsky, D. (1996). ‘Universal Tendencies in the Semantics of the Diminutive’, Language 72: 533–78.Find this resource:

Kager, R. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— Pater, J., and Zonneveld, W. (eds.) (2004). Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kahn, D. (1980). Syllable-Based Generalizations in English Phonology. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Kalinina, E., Kolomatsky, D., and Sudobina, A. (2006). ‘Transitivity Increase Markers Interacting with Verb Semantics: Evidence from Finno-Ugric Languages’, in L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, and P. de Swart (eds.), Case, Valency and Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 441–63.Find this resource:

Kant, I. (1927). Critique of Pure Reason, trans. F. Max Mueller. 2nd rev. edn. New York: Macmillan.Find this resource:

Kay, P., Berlin, B., Maffi, L., and Merrifield, W. (1997). ‘Color Naming across Languages’, in Hardin and Maffi (1997: 21–56).Find this resource:

—— and Merrifield, W. (1991). ‘Biocultural Implications of Systems of Color Naming’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1: 12–25.Find this resource:

—— and Maffi, L. (1999). ‘Color Appearance and the Emergence and Evolution of Basic Color Lexicons’, American Anthropologist 101: 743–60.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Colour Terms’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 534–45).Find this resource:

—— and McDaniel, C. K. (1978). ‘The Linguistic Significance of the Meanings of Basic Color Terms’, Language 54: 610–46.Find this resource:

Kayne, R. S. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Kazenin, K. I. (1994). ‘Split Syntactic Ergativity: Toward an Implicational Hierarchy’, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 47: 78–98.Find this resource:

—— (2001a). ‘The Passive Voice’, in Haspelmath et al. (2001: ii. 899–916).Find this resource:

—— (2001b). ‘Verbal Reflexives and the Middle Voice’, in Haspelmath et al. (2001: ii. 916–27).Find this resource:

Keenan, E. L. (1975). ‘Variation in Universal Grammar’, in R. W. Fasold and R. W. Shuy (eds.), Analyzing Variation in Language: Papers from the Second Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 136–48.Find this resource:

—— (1976a). ‘Remarkable Subjects in Malagasy’, in Li (1976: 247–301).Find this resource:

—— (1976b). ‘Towards a Universal Definition of “Subject”’, in Li (1976: 303–33).Find this resource:

—— (1979). ‘On Surface Form and Logical Form’, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 8: 163–203.Find this resource:

—— (1985). ‘Relative Clauses’, in T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 2: Complex Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–70.Find this resource:

—— (1987a). Universal Grammar: 15 Essays. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

—— (1987b). ‘On Surface Form and Logical Form’, in Keenan (1987a: 89–120).Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘An Historical Explanation of Some Binding Theoretic Facts in English’, in J. Moore and M. Polinsky (eds.), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 153–90.Find this resource:

—— and Comrie, B. (1977). ‘Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Find this resource:

—— —— (1979). ‘Data on the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy’, Language 55: 333–51.Find this resource:

(p. 699) —— and Dryer, M. S. (2005). ‘Passive in the World's Languages’, in T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 1. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 325–61.Find this resource:

—— and Hawkins, S. (1987). ‘The Psychological Validity of the Accessibility Hierarchy’, in Keenan (1987a: 60–85).Find this resource:

Keller, R. (1994). On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

—— (1998). A Theory of Linguistic Signs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Kemmer, S. (1993). The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Keyser, S. J., and Roeper, T. (1984). ‘On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381–416.Find this resource:

Khanina, O. (2009). ‘The Symbiosis of Descriptive Linguistics and Typology: A Case Study of Desideratives’, in P. Epps and A. Arkhipov (eds.), New Challenges in Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 199–221.Find this resource:

Kibrik, A. A. (1996). ‘Transitivity in Lexicon and Grammar’, in A. E. Kibrik (ed.), Godoberi. Munich: Lincom Europa, 107–46.Find this resource:

Kibrik, A. E. (1997). ‘Beyond Subject and Object: Toward a Comprehensive Relational Typology’, Linguistic Typology 1: 279–346.Find this resource:

—— (1998). ‘Does Intragenetic Typology Make Sense?’, in W. Boeder, C. Schroeder, and K.-H. Wagner (eds.), Sprache im Raum und Zeit: In Memoriam Johannes Bechert, vol. 2: Beitrage zur empirischen Sprachwissenschaft.Tiibingen: Narr, 61–8.Find this resource:

Kimball, G. D. (1991). Koasati Grammar. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Find this resource:

Kimenyi, A. (1980). A Relational Grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Kimura, M. (1983). The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

King, J., and Just, M. A. (1991). ‘Individual Differences in Syntactic Processing: The Role of Working Memory’, Journal of Memory and Language 30: 580–602.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, P. (1974). ‘Remarks on Analogical Change’, in J. Anderson and C. Jones (eds.), Historical Linguistics: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Edinburgh 1973, vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 257–77.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘On the Architecture of Panini's Grammar’. MS. Available at: www.stanford.edu/~kiparskyFind this resource:

—— and Menn, L. (1977). ‘On the Acquisition of Phonology’, in J. Macnamara (ed.), Language Learning and Thought. New York: Academic Press, 44–78.Find this resource:

Kirby, S. (1999). Function, Selection, and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— Smith, K., and Brighton, H. (2004). ‘From UG to Universals’, Studies in Language 28: 587–607.Find this resource:

Kiss, K. É. (1994). ‘Sentence Structure and Word Order’, in F. Kiefer and K. É. Kiss (eds.), The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1–90.Find this resource:

Kittilä, S. (2002). Transitivity: Towards a Comprehensive Typology. Turku/Abo: Abo Aka-demis Tryckeri.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Remarks on Involuntary Agent Constructions’, Word 56: 3.Find this resource:

Klaiman, M. H. (1991). Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kleiber, G. (1990). La Semantique du prototype: categories et sens lexical. Paris: PUF.Find this resource:

Klein, T. (2005). ‘Infixation and Segmental Constraint Effects: UM and IN in Tagalog, Chamorro, and Toba Batak’, Lingua 115: 959–95.Find this resource:

(p. 700) Klimov, G. (1977). Tipologija jazykov aktivnogo stroja. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

—— (1983). Principy kontensivnoj tipologii. Moscow: Nauka.Find this resource:

Kluender, R. (2004). ‘Are Subject Islands Subject to a Processing Account?’, WCCFL 23: 475–99.Find this resource:

Koch, P. (1999). ‘Tree and Fruit: A Cognitive-Onomasiological Approach’, Studi italiani di linguistica teorica e applicata 28: 330–47.Find this resource:

Kölligan, D. (2004). ‘Wenn zwei dasselbe tun: Iterativa und Kausativa’, in M. Kozianka, R. Luhr, and S. Zeilfelder (eds.), Indogermanistik-Germanistik-Linguistik: Akten der Arbeit-stagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Jena 18–20.09.2002. Hamburg: Kovac, 193–248.Find this resource:

König, E. (1998). ‘General Preface’, in Siewierska (1998a: v–vii).Find this resource:

—— and Gast, V. (eds.) (2008). Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Typological Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Koptjevskaja-tamm, M. (1993a). Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

—— (1993b). ‘Finiteness’, in R. E. Asher and J. M. Simpson (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1245–8.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘“A piece of the cake” and “a cup of tea”: Partitive and Pseudo-Partitive Nominal Constructions in the Circum-Baltic Languages’, in Dahl and Koptjevskaja-Tamm (2001a: 523–68).Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘The Circle That Won't Come Full: Two Potential Isoglosses in the Circum-Baltic Area’, in Matras et al. (2006: 182–226).Find this resource:

—— (2008). ‘Approaching Lexical Typology’, in M. Vanhove (ed.), From Polysemy to Semantic Change: A Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–52.Find this resource:

—— and Rakhilina, E. (2006). ‘“Some Like It Hot”: On Semantics of Temperature Adjectives in Russian and Swedish’, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59: 253–69.Find this resource:

—— Vanhove, M., and Koch, P. (2007). ‘Typological Approaches to Lexical Semantics’, Linguistic Typology 11: 159–85.Find this resource:

—— and Wälchli, B. (2001). ‘The Circum-Baltic Languages: An Areal-Typological Approach’, in Dahl and Koptjevskaja-Tamm (2001a: 615–750).Find this resource:

Kortlandt, F. H. H. (1992). ‘On the Meaning of the Japanese Passive’, Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 24: 97–108.Find this resource:

Kortmann, B. (ed.) (2004). Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Koshal, S. (1979). Ladakhi Grammar. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Find this resource:

Kozinsky, I., and Polinsky, M. (1993). ‘Causee and Patient in the Causative of Transitive: Coding Conflict or Doubling of Grammatical Relations?’, in Comrie and Polinsky (1993: 177–240).Find this resource:

Kroeger, P. (1993). Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Find this resource:

Kulikov, L. (1999a). ‘May He Prosper in Offspring and Wealth (A Few Jubilee Remarks on the Typology of Labile Verbs and Sanskrit púṣyati ‘prospers; makes prosper’)’, in E. V. Rakhilina and Y. G. Testelets (eds.), Tipologija i teorija jazyka: Ot opisanija kob jasneniju. K 60-letiju A. E. Kibrika. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kulʼtury, 224–44.Find this resource:

—— (1999b). ‘Split Causativity: Remarks on Correlations between Transitivity, Aspect, and Tense’, in W. Abraham and L. Kulikov (eds.), Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and Causativity: Essays in Honour of Vladimir Nedjalkov. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 21–42.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Causatives’, in Haspelmath et al. (2001: ii. 886–98).Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘The Labile Syntactic Type in a Diachronic Perspective: The Case of Vedic’, SKY Journal of Linguistics (Journal of the Linguistic Association of Finland) 16: 93–112.Find this resource:

(p. 701) —— (2010). ‘Bridging Typology and Diachrony: A Preliminary Questionnaire for a Diachronic Typological Study of Voice and Valency-Changing Categories’, in V. F. Vydrin, S. J. Dmitrenko et al. (eds.), Problemy grammatiki i tipologii: Sbornik state] pamjati V. P. Nedjalkova. Moscow: Znak, 139–163.Find this resource:

Kuno, S. (1973). The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Kurylowicz, J. (1935). Etudes indoeuropeennes. Cracow: Gebethner & Wolff.Find this resource:

—— (1945–49). ‘La Nature des procès dits “analogiques”,’ Acta Linguistica 5: 15;37.Find this resource:

—— (1964). The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Find this resource:

Kwon, N., Polinsky, M., and Kluender, R. (2006). ‘Subject Preference in Korean’, in D. Baumer, D. Montero, and M. Scanlon (eds.), WCCFL: Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 1–14.Find this resource:

Laaha, S., and Gillis, S. (eds.) (2007). ‘Typological Perspectives on the Acquisition of Noun and Verb Morphology’, Antwerp Papers in Linguistic 112.Find this resource:

Labov, W. (1973). ‘The Boundaries of Words and Their Meanings’, in C.-J. N. Bailey and R. W. Shuy (eds.), New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 340–73.Find this resource:

—— (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Lacerda, F. (2009). ‘On the Emergence of Early Linguistic Functions: A Biological and Interactional Perspective’, in K. Alter, M. Horne, M. Lindgren, M. Roll, and J. von Koss Torkildsen (eds.), Brain Talk: Discourse With and In the Brain, Papers from the First Birgit Rausing Language Program Conference in Linguistics. Lund: Lund University, 208–30.Find this resource:

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics Across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Find this resource:

Lahiri, A., and Plank, F. (2008). ‘What Linguistic Universals Can Be True Of’, in S. Scalise, E. Magni, and A. Bisetto (eds.), Universals of Language Today. Dordrecht: Springer, 31–58.Find this resource:

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Lallot, J. (1998). La Grammaire de Denys le Thrace. Paris: CNRS.Find this resource:

Lander, Y. A., Plungian, V. A., and Urmancieva, A. Y. (eds.) (2004). Irrealis i irreal'nostʼ. Moscow: Gnozis.Find this resource:

Langacker, R. W. (1977). ‘Syntactic Reanalysis’, in C. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 57–139.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘Nouns and Verbs’, Language 63: 53–94.Find this resource:

—— (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘A Dynamic Usage-Based Model’, in M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 1–63.Find this resource:

LaPolla, R. J. (1993). ‘Arguments against “Subject” and “Object” as Viable Concepts in Chinese’, Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 63: 759–813.Find this resource:

Lass, R. (1997). Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Launey, M. (1994). Une Grammaire omnipredicative: essai sur la morphosyntaxe du Nahuatl classique. Paris: CNRS.Find this resource:

Lazard, G. (1998). Actancy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Le Marquage differentiel de l'objet’, in Haspelmath et al. (2001: ii. 873–85).Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘Transitivity Revisited as an Example of a More Strict Approach in Typological Research’, Folia Linguistica 36: 141–90.Find this resource:

(p. 702) Lazarus, M., and Steinthal, H. (1860). ‘Einleitende Gedanken über Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft’, Zeitschrift fürVölkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 1: 1–73.Find this resource:

Lehmann, C. (1982). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Cologne: AKUP.Find this resource:

—— (1983). ‘Directions for Interlinear Morphemic Translations’, Folia Linguistica 16: 193–224.Find this resource:

—— (1984). Der Relativsatz: Typologie seiner Strukturen, Theorie seiner Funktionen, Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

—— (1986). ‘On the Typology of Relative Clauses”,’ Linguistics 24: 663–80.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘On the Function of Agreement’, in M. Barlow and C. A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in Natural Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 55–67.Find this resource:

—— (1995). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

—— (1998). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Language Documentation: A Program’, in W. Bisang (ed.), Aspects of Typology and Universals. Berlin: Akademie, 83–97.Find this resource:

Lehmann, W. P. (1973). ‘A Structural Principle of Language and Its Implications’, Language 49: 47–66.Find this resource:

—— (1974). Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1978a). Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Find this resource:

—— (1978b). ‘Conclusion: Toward an Understanding of the Profound Unity Underlying Languages’, in Lehmann (1978a: 395–432).Find this resource:

—— (1978c). ‘The Great Underlying Ground-Plans’, in Lehmann (1978a: 3–55).Find this resource:

—— (1993). ‘Diagnostic Uses of Typology’, Languages of the World 7: 3–13.Find this resource:

—— (1995). Residues of Pre-Indo-European Active Structure and Their Implications for the Relationships among the Dialects. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Find this resource:

—— (2002). Pre-Indo-European. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Find this resource:

Lehrer, A. (1992). ‘A Theory of Vocabulary Structure: Retrospectives and Prospectives’, in M. Pütz (ed.), Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in Honour of René Dirven on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday. Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins, 243–56.Find this resource:

Leko, N. (2000). ‘Syntactic vs. Semantic Agreement in the Oslo Corpus’, in T. Holloway King and I. A. Sekerina (eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 8: The Philadelphia Meeting 1999. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, 259–78.Find this resource:

Levelt, C. C., and de Vijver, R. (2004). ‘Syllable Types in Cross-linguistic and Developmental Grammars’, in Kager et al. (2004: 204–18).Find this resource:

Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Levin, M. (2001). Agreement with Collective Nouns in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Find this resource:

Levinson, S. C. (2000a). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (2000b). ‘Yélî Dnye and the Theory of Basic Color Terms’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10: 1–53.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Syntactic Ergativity in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan Language of Rossel Island’. MS. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Find this resource:

—— and Meira, S. (2003). ‘“Natural Concepts” in the Spatial Topological Domain’, Language 79: 485–516.Find this resource:

(p. 703) —— and Wilkins, D. P. (eds.) (2006). Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lewis, D. (1984). ‘Putnam's Paradox’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 221–36.Find this resource:

Lewis, G. L. (1967). Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Lewis, M. (1984). ‘Relative Clauses in A?lç Ewe’, Studies in African Linguistics 9: 196–202.Find this resource:

Li, C. N. (ed.) (1976). Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—— and Thompson, S. A. (1974). ‘An Explanation of Word Order Change SVO ? SOV’, Foundations of Language 12: 201–14.Find this resource:

—— (1976). ‘Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language’, in Li (1976: 491–518).Find this resource:

—— (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Li, F. (1991). ‘An Examination of Causative Morphology from a Cross-linguistic and Diachronic Perspective’, in Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pt. 1: The General Session. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 344–59.Find this resource:

Lichtenberk, F. (1983). A Grammar of Manam. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Find this resource:

—— (1991). ‘Semantic Change and Heterosemy in Grammaticalization’, Language 67: 474–509.Find this resource:

Lidz, L. (2007). ‘Combinatorial Complexity: An Example from Yongning Na (Mosuo)’, paper presented at the Pre-ALT workshop on Linguistic Typology and Language Documentation, Paris, 24–25 September.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, D. (1999). The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Grammatical Approaches to Syntax’, in B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 495–508.Find this resource:

Lillehaugen, B. D. (2004). ‘Syntactic and Semantic Development of Body Part Prepositions in Valley Zapotec Languages’, in J. Castillo (ed.), Proceedings from the Sixth Workshop on American Indigenous Languages, Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 14: 69–82.Find this resource:

Lindblom, B. (1983). ‘Economy of Speech Gestures’, in P. F. MacNeilage (ed.), The Production of Speech. New York: Springer, 217–46.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Developmental Origins of Adult Phonology: The Interplay between Phonetic Emergents and the Evolutionary Adaptations of Sound Patterns’, Phonetica 57: 297–314.Find this resource:

—— MacNeilage, P., and Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1984). ‘Self-Organizing Processes and the Explanation of Phonological Universals’, in B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, and Ö. Dahl (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals. New York: Mouton, 181–203.Find this resource:

—— (1990). Evolution of Spoken Language. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—— and Maddieson, I. (1988). ‘Phonetic Universals in Consonant Systems’, in L. M. Hyman and C. N. Li (eds.), Language, Speech and Mind. London: Routledge, 62–78.Find this resource:

Lindstedt, J. (2000). ‘The Perfect: Aspectual, Temporal, and Evidential’, in Dahl (2000a: 365–84).Find this resource:

Linguistic Typology (2007). 11.1.Find this resource:

Löbner, S. (2003). Understanding Semantics. London: Arnold.Find this resource:

Loeb-Diehl, F. (2005). ‘The Typology of Manner Expressions’, Ph.D. diss., Radboud University.Find this resource:

Lohr, M. (2000). ‘New Approaches to Lexicostatistics and Glottochronology’, in C. Renfrew, A. McMahon, and L. Trask (eds.), Time Depth in Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 209–22.Find this resource:

Lucy, J. A. (1992). Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 704) Lukas, J. (1953). Die Sprache der Tubu in der zentralen Sahara. Berlin: Akademie.Find this resource:

Lüpke, F. (2007). ‘Vanishing Voice: The Morphologically Zero-Coded Passive of Jalonke’, in P. Austin and A. Simpson (eds.), Endangered Languages. Hamburg: Buske, 173–90.Find this resource:

Lust, B. (2006). Child Language: Acquisition and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Luutonen, J. (1997). The Variation of Morpheme Order in Mari Declension. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Find this resource:

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

MacDonald, L. (1990). A Grammar of Tauya. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). ‘The Lexical Nature of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution’, Psychological Review 101.4: 676–703.Find this resource:

MacWhinney, B. (2004). ‘A Multiple Process Solution to the Logical Problem of Language Acquisition’, Journal of Child Language 31: 883–914.Find this resource:

Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2005a). Contributions to Haspelmath et al. (2005).Find this resource:

—— (2005b). ‘Tone’, in Haspelmath et al. (2005: 58–61).Find this resource:

—— (2006). ‘Correlating Phonological Complexity: Data and Validation’, Linguistic Typology 10: 108–25.Find this resource:

—— (2009). ‘Calculating Phonological Complexity’, in F. Pellegrino, E. Marsico, I. Chitoran, and C. Coupé (eds.), Approaches to Phonological Complexity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 85–109.Find this resource:

Mairal, R., and Gil, J. (eds.) (2006). Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Majid, A., Bowerman, M., van Staden, M., and Boster, J. S. (2007). ‘The Semantic Categories of “Cutting and Breaking” Events Across Languages’, Cognitive Linguistics 18: 133–52.Find this resource:

—— Enfield, N. J., and van Staden, M. (eds.) (2006). Parts of the Body: Cross-linguistic Categorization. Special issue of Language Sciences (28.2–3).Find this resource:

Majsak, T., and Raxilina, E. (eds.) (2007). Aquamotion. Glagoly dviženija v vode: Leksiceskaja tipologija. Moscow: Indrik.Find this resource:

Malchukov, A. L. (1995). Even. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

—— (2000). Dependency Reversal in Noun-Attributive Constructions: Towards a Typology. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

—— and Spencer, A. (eds.) (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Malkiel, Y. (1970). ‘Genetic Analysis of Word Formation’, in T. Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 3. The Hague: Mouton, 305–64.Find this resource:

Mallinson, G., and Blake, B. J. (1981). Language Typology: Cross-linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Find this resource:

Manaster Ramer, A., Michalove, P., Baertsch, K., and Adams, K. (1998). ‘Exploring the Nostratic Hypothesis’, in J. Salmons and B. Joseph (eds.), Nostratic: Sifting the Evidence. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 61–84.Find this resource:

Manczak, W. (1958). ‘Tendences générales des changements analogiques’, Lingua 7: 298–325, 387–420.Find this resource:

—— (1978a). ‘Irregular Sound Change Due to Frequency in German’, in J. Fisiak (ed.), Recent Developments in Historical Phonology. The Hague: Mouton, 309–19.Find this resource:

—— (1978b). ‘Les Lois du développement analogique’, Linguistics 205: 53–60.Find this resource:

(p. 705) —— (1980). ‘Laws of Analogy’, in J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 283–8.Find this resource:

Manninen, S., and Nelson, D. (2004). ‘What Is a Passive? The Case of Finnish’, Studia Linguistica 58: 212–51.Find this resource:

Manning, C. D. (1996). Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Find this resource:

Marantz, A. (1984). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Marchand, H. (1960). Categories and Types of English Word Formation. Heidelberg: Winter.Find this resource:

Marcus, M. P. (1980). A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Martin, J. B. (2000). ‘Creek Voice: Beyond Valency’, in Dixon and Aikhenvald (2000: 375–403).Find this resource:

Martinet, A. (1955). Économie des changements phonétiques: traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: Francke.Find this resource:

—— (1962). A Functional View of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Martins, S., and Martins, V. (1999). ‘Maku’, in R. M. W. Dixon and A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251–68.Find this resource:

Masica, C. (1976). Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Maslova, E. (2000). ‘A Dynamic Approach to the Verification of Distributional Universals’, Linguistic Typology 4: 307–33.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘A Case for Implicational Universals’, Linguistic Typology 7: 101–8.Find this resource:

Maspero, G. (1915). Grammaire de la langage khmère. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Find this resource:

Mater, E. (1971). Deutsche Verben, vol. 6. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.Find this resource:

Matisoff, J. (1978). Variational Semantics in Tibeto-Burman. Philadelphia, PA: ISHI.Find this resource:

Matras, Y. (1998). ‘Utterance Modifiers and the Universals of Grammatical Borrowing’, Linguistics 36: 281–331.Find this resource:

—— (2001). ‘Language Contact’, in J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics Online. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Contact, Connectivity and Language Evolution’, in J. Rehbein, C. Hohenstein, and L. Pietsch (eds.), Connectivity in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 51–74.Find this resource:

—— McMahon, A., and Vincent, N. (eds.) (2006). Linguistic Areas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

—— and Sakel, J. (eds.) (2007a). Grammatical Borrowing: A Cross-linguistic Survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (2007b). ‘Investigating the Mechanisms of Pattern Replication in Language Convergence’, Studies in Language 31: 829–65.Find this resource:

Matthews, P. (1990). ‘La linguistica greco-latina’, in G. C. Lepschy (ed.), Storia della linguistica, vol. 1. Bologna: Il Mulino, 187–310.Find this resource:

Matthews, P. H. (2007). Syntactic Relations: A Critical Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Matthews, S., and Yip, V. (2003). ‘Relative Clauses in Early Bilingual Development: Transfer and Universals’, in Giacalone Ramat (2003: 39–81).Find this resource:

Matthewson, L. (2001). ‘Quantification and the Nature of Crosslinguistic Variation’, Natural Language Semantics 9: 145–89.Find this resource:

(p. 706) Matthewson, L. (2004). ‘On the Methodology of Semantic Fieldwork’, International Journal of American Linguistics 70: 369–415.Find this resource:

Mayerthaler, W. (1981). Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Find this resource:

—— (1987). ‘System-Independent Morphological Naturalness’, in Dressler et al. (1987: 25–58).Find this resource:

McCarthy, J. (2002). A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— and Prince, A. (1993). ‘Generalized Alignment’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 79–153.Find this resource:

McCawley, J. D. (1971). ‘Tense and Time Reference in English’, in C. Fillmore and D. T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 96–113.Find this resource:

Mccloskey, J. (2001). ‘On the Distribution of Subject Properties in Irish’, in W. D. Davies and S. Dubinsky (eds.), Objects and Other Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 157–92.Find this resource:

McGregor, W. (2002). Verb Classification in Australian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

McMahon, A., and McMahon, R. (2000). ‘Problems of Dating and Time Depth in Linguistics and Biology’, in C. Renfrew, A. McMahon, and L. Trask (eds.), Time Depth in Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 59–73.Find this resource:

Meid, W. (1989). Das Problem von Indogermanisch /b/. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Find this resource:

Meillet, A. (1912). ‘LʼÉvolution des formes grammaticales’, Scientia 12: 384–400.Find this resource:

—— (1967). The Comparative Method in Historical Linguistics, trans. G. Ford. Paris: Champion.Find this resource:

—— (1975 [1914]). ‘Le Problème de la parenté des langues’, Scientia 15: 403–25Find this resource:

. (Repr. in

A. Meillet, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion, 76–101Find this resource:

.)

MelʼČuk, I. A. (1968 [1976]). ‘Stroenie jazykovyx znakov i vozmožnye formalʼno-smyslovye otnošenija meždu nimi’, Izvestija AN SSR, Serija lit. i jaz. 5Find this resource:

. (Eng. trans.

‘The Structure of Linguistic Signs and Possible Formal-Semantic Relations Between Them’, in Das Wort. Munich: Fink, 89–114Find this resource:

.)

—— (1991). ‘Toward a Universal Calculus of Inflectional Categories: On Roman Jakobson's Trail’, in L. Waugh and S. Rudy (eds.), New Vistas in Grammar: Invariance and Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 85–109.Find this resource:

—— (1993). ‘The Inflectional Category of Voice: Towards a More Rigorous Definition’, in Comrie and Polinsky (1993: 1–46).Find this resource:

—— (1994). Cours de morphologie générale (théorique et descriptive), vol. 2: Significations morphologiques. Montréal, PQ: Presses de lʼUniversité de Montréal.Find this resource:

—— and XolodoviČ, A. A. (1970). ‘K teorii grammatičeskogo zaloga’, Narody Azii i Afriki 4: 111–24.Find this resource:

Menn, L. (1983). ‘Development of Articulatory, Phonetic, and Phonological Capabilities’, in B. Butterworth (ed.), Language Production, vol. 2. London: Academic Press, 3–50.Find this resource:

Merlan, F. (1985). ‘Split Intransitivity: Functional Oppositions in Inflections’, in J. Nichols and A. C. Woodbury (eds.), Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause: Some Approaches to Theory from the Field. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 324–62.Find this resource:

Michael, L. (2008). ‘Nanti Evidential Practice: Language, Knowledge, and Social Action in Amazonian Society’, Ph.D. diss., University of Texas at Austin.Find this resource:

Miestamo, M. (2003). ‘Clausal Negation’, Ph.D. diss., University of Helsinki.Find this resource:

Miller, D. G. (1975). ‘Indo-European: VSO, SOV, SVO or All Three?’, Lingua 37: 31–52.Find this resource:

(p. 707) Miller, J. G. (1993). Complex Verb Formation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Miller, W. R. (1965). Acoma Grammar and Texts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Milner, G. B. (1973). ‘It is Aspect (not Voice) which is Marked in Samoan’, Oceanic Linguistics 12: 621–39.Find this resource:

Misteli, F. (1893). Charakteristik der hauptsächlichsten Typen des Sprachbaues. Berln: Dümmler.Find this resource:

Mithun, M. (1984). ‘The Evolution of Noun Incorporation’, Language 60: 847–94.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘The Grammaticization of Coordination’, in J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 331–59.Find this resource:

—— (1991). ‘Active/Agentive Case Marking and Its Motivations’, Language 67: 510–46.Find this resource:

—— (1992). ‘Is Basic Word Order Universal?’, in D. L. Payne (ed.), Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 15–61.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘On the Relativity of Irreality’, in Bybee and Fleischman (1995: 367–88).Find this resource:

—— (1999). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2000). ‘Noun and Verb in Iroquoian Languages: Multicategorisation from Multiple Criteria’, in P. M. Vogel and B. Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 397–420.Find this resource:

—— (2005). ‘Ergativity and Language Contact on the Oregon Coast: Alsea, Siuslaw, and Coos’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 27: 77–95.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘Integrating Approaches to Diversity: Argument Structure on the Northwest Coast’, in Y. Matsumoto, D. Oshima, O. Robinson, and P. Sells (eds.), Diversity in Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 9–36.Find this resource:

—— (2008a). ‘Borrowed Rhetorical Constructions as Starting Points for Grammaticalization’, in A. Bergs and G. Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (2008b). ‘The Emergence of Agentive Systems in Core Argument Marking’, in Donohue and Wichmann (2008: 297–333).Find this resource:

—— (forthcoming). ‘Core Argument Patterns and Deep Genetic Relations: Hierarchical Systems in Northern California’, in B. Comrie and P. Suihkonen (eds.), Typology of Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Miyamoto, E. T., and Nakamura, M. (2003). ‘Subject/Object Asymmetries in the Processing of Relative Clauses in Japanese’, in G. Garding and M. Tsujimura (eds.), WCCFL: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 342–55.Find this resource:

Mohanan, T. (1994). Argument Structure in Hindi. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Find this resource:

Moore, J., and Polinsky, M. (2003). ‘Explanations in Linguistics’, in J. Moore and M. Polinsky (eds.), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 1–30.Find this resource:

Moravcsik, E. A. (1975). ‘Borrowed Verbs’, Wiener Linguistische Gazette 8: 3–30.Find this resource:

—— (1978a). ‘Agreement’, in J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 4. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 352–74.Find this resource:

—— (1978b). ‘On the Distribution of Ergative and Accusative Patterns’, Lingua 45: 233–79.Find this resource:

—— (1995). ‘Summing up Suffixaufnahme’, in Plank (1995: 451–84).Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘What is Universal about Typology?’, Linguistic Typology 11: 27–41.Find this resource:

—— and Wirth, J. (1986). ‘Markedness: An Overview’, in F. R. Eckman, E. A. Moravcsik, and J. R. Wirth (eds.), Markedness. New York: Plenum, 1–11.Find this resource:

Morpurgo Davies, A. (1975). ‘Language Classification in the Nineteenth Century’, in T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 13: Historiography of Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 606–716.Find this resource:

(p. 708) Morpurgo Davies, A. (1994). ‘La linguistica dellʼOttocento’, in G. C. Lepschy (ed.), Storia della linguistica, vol. 3. Bologna: Il Mulino, 11–399.Find this resource:

Mosel, U. (1987). ‘Subject in Samoan’, in D. C. Laycock and W. Winter (eds.), A World of Language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 455–79.Find this resource:

Mous, M. (2004). ‘The Grammar of Conjunctive and Disjunctive Coordination in Iraqw’, in M. Haspelmath (ed.), Co-ordinating Constructions. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 109–22.Find this resource:

Mowrey, R., and Pagliuca, W. (1995). ‘The Reductive Character of Articulatory Evolution’, Rivista di linguistica 7: 37–124.Find this resource:

MÜller, F. M. (1876). Grundriss der Sprachwissenschaft, vol. 1: Einleitung in die Sprachwissenschaft. Vienna: Hölder.Find this resource:

—— (1880). Lectures on the Science of Language, vol. 1. 6th edn. London: Longmans.Find this resource:

MÜller-Gotama, F. (1994). Grammatical Relations: A Cross-linguistic Perspective on Their Syntax and Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Munro, P. (2003). ‘Field Linguistics’, in M. Aronoff and J. Rees-Miller (eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 130–49.Find this resource:

—— and Gordon, L. (1982). ‘Syntactic Relations in Western Muskogean’, Language 58: 81–115.Find this resource:

Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Find this resource:

Murphy, G. L. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Muysken, P. (1981). ‘Quechua Causatives and Logical Form: A Case Study of Markedness’, in A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, 445–73.Find this resource:

—— (1994). ‘Media Lengua’, in P. Bakker and M. Mous (eds.), Mixed Languages: 15 Case Studies in Language Intertwining. Amsterdam: IFOTT, 207–11.Find this resource:

—— (2000). Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-Mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Myers-Scotton, C. (2002). Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Nacaskul, K. (1976). ‘Types of Elaboration in Some Southeast Asian Languages’, in P. N. Jenner, L. C. Thompson, and S. Starosta (eds.), Austroasiatic Studies II. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii, 873–90.Find this resource:

Nbss, Å. (2003). ‘Transitivity: From Semantics to Structure’, Ph.D. diss., University of Nijmegen.Find this resource:

—— (2007). Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Nagano, Y. (1984). A Historical Study of the rGyarong Verb System. Tokyo: Seishido.Find this resource:

Narasimhan, B. (2005). ‘Splitting the Notion of “Agent”: Case-Marking in Early Child Hindi’, Journal of Child Language 32: 787–803.Find this resource:

Nedjalkov, I. V. (1991). ‘Recessive-Accessive Polysemy of Verbal Affixes’, Languages of the World 1: 4–31.Find this resource:

—— (1997). Evenki. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

—— and Nedjalkov, V. P. (1988). ‘Stative, Resultative, Passive and Perfect in Evenki’, in V. Nedjalkov (1988: 241–57).Find this resource:

Nedjalkov, V. P. (1964). ‘O svjazi kauzativnosti i passivnosti’, Učenye zapiski Baškirskogo universiteta 21: Serija filologičeskix nauk 9: 301–10.Find this resource:

—— (1977). ‘Posessivnostʼ i inkorporacija v čukotskom jazyke (inkorporacija podležaščego)’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Problemy lingvističeskoj tipologii i struktury jazyka. Leningrad: Nauka, 108–38.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1988). Typology of Resultative Constructions. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

(p. 709) —— (2000). ‘Tipologija sredstv vyraženija reciprokalʼnogo značenija’, in L. Kuzʼmin (ed.), Jazyk. Glagol. Predloženie. K 70-letiju G. G. Silʼnickogo. Smolensk: SGPU, 14–37.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Zametki po tipologii vyraženija reciprokalʼnogo i refleksivnogo značenij’, in V. S. Xrakovskij, A. Malchukov, and S. I. Dmitrenko (eds.), 40 let Sankt-Peterburgskoj tipologičeskoj škole. Moscow: Znak, 315–93.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (2007). Reciprocal Constructions. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— and Jaxontov, S. J. (1988). ‘Introduction’, in Nedjalkov (1988: 3–62).Find this resource:

—— and Litvinov, V. P. (1995). ‘The St Petersburg/Leningrad Typology Group’, in Shibatani and Bynon (1995: 215–71).Find this resource:

—— Otaina, G. A., and XolodoviČ, A. A. (1969). ‘Morfologičeskij i leksičeskij kauzativy v nivxskom jazyke’, in Xolodovič (1969: 179–99)Find this resource:

. (Eng. trans.

‘Morphological and Lexical Causatives in Nivkh’, in D. C. Bennett, T. Bynon, and B. G. Hewitt (eds.), Subject, Voice and Ergativity: Selected Essays. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1995, 60–81Find this resource:

.)

—— and Siʼnickij, G. G. (1969a). ‘Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij’, in Xolodovič (1969: 5–19).Find this resource:

—— —— (1969b). ‘Tipologija morfologičeskogo i leksičeskogo kauzativa’, in Xolodovič (1969: 20–50)Find this resource:

. (Eng. trans.

‘The Typology of Morphological and Lexical Causatives’, in F. Kiefer (ed.), Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973, 1–32.Find this resource:

)

Nemser, W. (1971). ‘Approximative Systems of Foreign Language Learners’, International Review of Applied Linguistics 9: 115–23.Find this resource:

Nerlove, S., and Romney, A. (1967). ‘Sibling Terminology and Cross-Sex Behavior’, American Anthropologist 74: 1249–53.Find this resource:

Nettle, D. (1999a). Linguistic Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1999b). ‘Is the Rate of Linguistic Change Constant?’, Lingua 108: 119–36.Find this resource:

—— and Romaine, S. (2000). Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World's Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Newmeyer, F. J. (1992). ‘Iconicity and Generative Grammar’, Language 68: 756–96.Find this resource:

—— (1998). Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

—— (2002). ‘Optimality and Functionality: A Critique of Functionally-Based Optimality Theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 43–80.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage’, Language 79: 682–707.Find this resource:

—— (2004). ‘Typological Evidence and Universal Grammar’, Studies in Language 28: 526–48.Find this resource:

—— (2005). Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Newnham, R. (1971). About Chinese. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Find this resource:

Ngonyani, D. S. (1996). ‘The Morphosyntax of Applicatives’, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.Find this resource:

Nguyen, D.-H. (1965). ‘Parallel Constructions in Vietnamese’, Lingua 15: 125–39.Find this resource:

Nichols, J. (1986). ‘Head-Marking and Dependent-Marking Grammar’, Language 62: 56–119.Find this resource:

—— (1988). ‘On Alienable and Inalienable Possession’, in W. Shipley (ed.), In Honor of Mary Haas: From the Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 557–609.Find this resource:

—— (1992). Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

—— (2003). ‘Diversity and Stability in Language’, in R. D. Janda and B. D. Joseph (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 283–310.Find this resource:

—— (2007). ‘What, if Anything, Is Typology?’, Linguistic Typology 11: 231–8.Find this resource:

(p. 710) Nichols, J. (2008). ‘Why Are Stative-Active Languages Rare in Eurasia? A Typological Perspective on Split-Subject Marking’, in Donohue and Wichmann (2008: 121–38).Find this resource:

—— Peterson, D. A., and Barnes, J. (2004). ‘Transitivizing and Detransitivizing Languages’, Linguistic Typology 8: 149–211.Find this resource:

Nikolaeva, I., and Tolskaya, M. (2001). A Grammar ofUdihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Nordhoff, S. (2006). ‘Subtractive Plural Marking in Sinhala’, paper presented at the Rara and Rarissima Conference, Leipzig, March-April. Available at: http://home.medewerker.uva.nl/s.nordhoff/page3.htmlFind this resource:

Oʼconnor, L. (2009). ‘All Typologies Leak: Predicates of Change in Lowland Chontal of Oaxaca’, in P. Epps and A. Arkhipov (eds.), New Challenges in Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 343–64.Find this resource:

Oʼgrady, W., Lee, M., and Choo, M. (2003). ‘A Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Korean as a Second Language’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 433–48.Find this resource:

Ohala, J. J. (1983). ‘The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints’, in P. F. MacNeilage (ed.), The Production of Speech. New York: Springer, 189–216.Find this resource:

—— (1984). ‘An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-language Utilization of Fo of Voice’, Phonetica 41: 1–16.Find this resource:

Olawsky, K. (2007). ‘ObViouS OVS in Urarina Syntax’, in P. Austin and A. Simpson (eds.), Endangered Languages. Hamburg: Buske, 45–72.Find this resource:

Olson, M. (1975). ‘Barai Grammar: Highlights’, in T. E. Dutton (ed.), Studies in Languages of Central and South-East Papua. Canberra: Australian National University, 471–512.Find this resource:

Onishi, M. (2000). ‘Transitivity and Valency-Changing Derivations in Motuna’, in Dixon and Aikhenvald (2000: 115–44).Find this resource:

Orr, R. (2001). ‘Review of Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin and French, by Brigitte Bauer’, Journal of Indo-European Studies 29: 420–35.Find this resource:

Ospina Bozzi, A. (2002). ‘Les Structures élémentaires du Yuhup Maku, langue de lʼAmazonie Colombienne: morphologie et syntaxe’, Ph.D. diss., Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot.Find this resource:

Ouhalla, J. (1999). Introducing Transformational Grammar: From Principles and Parameters to Minimalism. London: Arnold.Find this resource:

Ourn, N., and Haiman, J. (2000). ‘Symmetrical Compounds in Khmer’, Studies in Language 24: 483–514.Find this resource:

ÖztÜrk, Ö., and Papafragou, A. (2008). ‘The Acquisition of Evidentiality and Source Monitoring’, in H. Chan, H. Jacob, and E. Kapia (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, vol. 2. Somerville, MA: Casca-dilla Press, 367–77.Find this resource:

Pagliuca, W. (ed.) (1994). Perspectives on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (1990). Modality and the English Modals. 2nd edn. London: Longman.Find this resource:

—— (1994). Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

—— (2001). Mood and Modality. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Paloposki, P. (1999). Puolan kielioppi. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.Find this resource:

Partee, B. (1995). ‘Quantificational Structures and Compositionality’, in Bach et al. (1995: 541–602).Find this resource:

—— (1999). ‘Semantics’, in R. A. Wilan and F. C. Keil (eds.), The MIT Encyclopaedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 739–42.Find this resource:

(p. 711) Paul, H. (1995 [1880]). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 9th edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Pavesi, M. (1986). ‘Markedness, Discoursal Modes, and Relative Clause Formation in a Formal and an Informal Context’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 8: 38–55.Find this resource:

Pawley, A. (1993). ‘A Language that Defies Description by Ordinary Means’, in W. Foley (ed.), The Role of Theory in Language Description. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 87–129.Find this resource:

Payne, D. L. (1985). ‘Review of Word Order Universals, by J. A. Hawkins’, Language 61: 462–6.Find this resource:

—— (1990). The Pragmatics of Word Order: Typological Dimensions of Verb Initial Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— and Barshi, I. (eds.) (1999). External Possession. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Find this resource:

—— and Payne, T. E. (1990). ‘Yagua’, in G. Pullum and D. Derbyshire (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 249–474.Find this resource:

Payne, T. E. (1997). Describing Morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Pearson, M. (2005). ‘The Malagasy Subject/Topic as an A′-element’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 381–457.Find this resource:

Pedersen, H. (1951). Die Gemeinindoeuropäischen und die Vorindoeuropäischen Verschlusslaute. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Find this resource:

Pellegrino, F. (forthcoming). ‘Rhythm’, in P. C. Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Penke, M., and Rosenbach, A. (eds.) (2004). What Counts as Evidence in Linguistics? The Case of Innateness. Special issue of Studies in Language (28.3).Find this resource:

Perkins, R. D. (1980). ‘The Evolution of Culture and Grammar’, Ph.D. diss., SUNY, Buffalo.Find this resource:

—— (1989). ‘Statistical Techniques for Determining Language Sample Size’, Studies in Language 13: 293–315.Find this resource:

Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). ‘Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–89.Find this resource:

Perniss, P. M., Pfau, R., and Steinbach, M. (eds.) (2007). Visible Variation: Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Peters, A. M. (1985). ‘Language Segmentation: Operating Principles for the Perception and Analysis of Language’, in Slobin (1985b: 1029–64).Find this resource:

—— (1997). ‘Language Typology, Prosody, and the Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes’, in Slobin (1997b: 135–98).Find this resource:

Peterson, D. A. (2007). Applicative Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Peterson, J. (1998). Grammatical Relations in Pali and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Pickard, M. (1995). ‘Issues in the Glottalic Theory of Indo-European: The Comparative Method, Typology, and Naturalness’, Word 46: 225–35.Find this resource:

Pickering, M., and Shillcock, R. (1992). ‘Processing Subject Extractions’, in H. Goodluck and M. Rochemont (eds.), Island Constraints: Theory, Acquisition and Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 295–320.Find this resource:

Pierrehumbert, J. (1994). ‘Syllable Structure and Word Structure: A Study of Triconso-nantal Clusters in English’, in P. A. Keating (ed.), Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–88.Find this resource:

Pike, K. L. (1945). Tone Languages: The Nature of Tonemic Systems, with a Technique for the Analysis of Their Significant Pitch Contrasts. Glendale, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Find this resource:

Pilhofer, G. (1933). Grammatik der Kâte-Sprache in Neuguinea. Berlin: Reimer.Find this resource:

(p. 712) Pinker, S. (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Pitchford, N. J., and Mullen, K. T. (2002). ‘Is the Acquisition of Basic-Colour Terms in Young Children Constrained?’, Perception 31: 1349–70.Find this resource:

Plank, F. (ed.) (1979). Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Academic Press.Find this resource:

—— (1984). ‘24 Grundsätzliche Fragen zur Wortartenfrage’, Leuvense Bijdragen 73: 489–520.Find this resource:

—— (1991). ‘Hypology, Typology: The Gabelentz Puzzle’, Folia Linguistica 25: 421–58.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (1995). Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. New York: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (2003a). Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

—— (2003b). ‘There's More than One Way to Make Sense of One-Way Implications—and Sense They Need to Be Made of’, Linguistic Typology 7: 128–39.Find this resource:

—— (ed.) (2003c). Das grammatische Raritatenkabinett. Available at: http://typo.uni-kon-stanz.de/rara/intro/

—— (2007). ‘Extent and Limits of Linguistic Diversity as the Remit of Typology—But Through Constraints on What Is Diversity Limited?’, Linguistic Typology 11: 43–68.Find this resource: