Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 22 September 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article is concerned with ‘formalism’, as it appears, as a term of criticism in the tradition of thought originating with Holmes and the Realists. It presents two examples of the first difficulty in grasping the aim of this tradition, i.e., scarecrows, and it then briefly elaborates the second difficulty, i.e., the varieties of formalism. It critically surveys what various writers since Holmes have meant by ‘formalism’ and places the various types of formalism in relation to one another. It also offers directions for addressing two broad questions that are threaded throughout the previous tapestry of formalisms, those of desirability and the very possibility of judicial adherence to rules. The purpose here is to motivate certain features of post-Holmesian thought that would otherwise seem confusing.

Keywords: formalism, criticism, post-Holmesian thought, desirability, judicial adherence

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.