Abstract and Keywords
This article describes some of the most influential criticisms of inclusive positivism. It discusses in detail three commitments: the Social Fact Thesis, the Conventionality Thesis, and the Separability Thesis. The modified version of the Social Fact Thesis explains the validity of first-order norms. the Weak Conventionality Thesis gives a more detailed account of the social fact that explains the authority of the validity criteria. The Strong Conventionality Thesis asserts that officials are obligated to apply the requirements of the rule of recognition in discharging their official functions. The Separability Thesis, foundation of positivism, asserts that law and morality are conceptually distinct. This article presents the historical overview of Incorporation Thesis. Critics of inclusive positivism have developed a number of arguments claiming to show that inclusive legal positivism is conceptually incoherent. Finally, it discusses two components to the Incorporation Thesis, the Necessity Component and the Sufficiency Component.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.