Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 06 June 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article considers some of the conceptual relations between the conventionally identified sources of law and the idea of legal validity. It begins with the discussion of concept of legal validity and legal system. It also presents the idea of inclusive positivism with three versions. There are two main ways in which inclusive positivists can claim that morality bears on what the law is. One type of phenomenon is conditional validity and the other is content validity. This article also briefly considers another version of inclusive positivism. This version maintains that law is basically source based, but it also incorporates those norms that are entailed by source-based law. This article concludes with the argument that the inclusive version of legal positivism, which was meant to form a middle ground between exclusive legal positivism and Dworkin's anti-positivist doctrine, is invalid.

Keywords: legal validity, legal system, conditional validity, inclusive positivism

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.