Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 20 September 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This article addresses the basic jurisprudential question. It is concerned with some of the ways in which people claim that an understanding of language helps to solve problem of jurisprudence. It attempts to identify some of the most interesting and important mistakes that legal philosophers have made about language. It discusses three reasons why understanding language might be useful. An understanding of vagueness points out that the language of the law, and the law itself, cannot always determine the outcome that the law requires, and that the judge must resolve questions left unresolved by the law. The diversity principle and the context principle are also essential for the development of useful theoretical terms. Another insight that language provides is of limited use in jurisprudence. A clear understanding of some of the problems of the philosophy of language is very useful for legal philosophers.

Keywords: jurisprudential, legal philosophers, vagueness, theoretical terms, language

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.