Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 28 November 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article discusses different uses of ‘responsibility’ in our everyday social, moral, and legal discourse. Moral responsibility serves as a template for more institutionalized forms of responsibility, thus the capacities it presupposes and its criteria of liability can illuminate other forms. The article further discusses criminal responsibility, notably the problems of finding an adequate theory of criminal legislation, appropriate response, and criteria of responsibility. It shows that the periodic oscillations between managerial and retributive approaches to punishment reflect a deeper debate about the nature of state–social relations. The article focuses on the debate in tort theory between instrumentalist and corrective justice views. The aim of the article is to show how a relational understanding of responsibility clarifies the debates within tort theory.

Keywords: moral responsibility, liability, criminal responsibility, state–social relations, tort theory

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.