Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 16 October 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This article looks at the relevance of the so-called frames in political analysis. It explains that frames matter and it can be seen in the ways in which political actors package their messages to affect their ability to recruit adherents, gain favorable media coverage, demobilize antagonists, and win political victories. The article traces the emergence of the concepts of frame and framing in the sociology of social movements in the 1980s and discusses the pioneering works of William Gamson and David Snow. Gamson and Snow adopted Erving Goffman's interactive perspective that frames are jointly and continuously constructed and reconstructed by movement actors and their audiences. This article also highlights the role of familiar relationships, routine practices, and institutionalized rules, both in spawning frames and in limiting their reach.

Keywords: frames, political analysis, political actors, social movements, William Gamson, David Snow, Erving Goffman, familiar relationships, routine practices, institutionalized rules

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.