Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 14 October 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This article looks at the relevance of theory, fact, and logic in contextual political analysis. It discusses the endless argument in the social and physical sciences where theory explains fact and fact tests theory by way of logic, which connects them as premise to a conclusion. It explains that fact tests theory by observation compared with prediction and if observation confirms prediction then what is observed confirms theory. It suggests that if postmodern antinomianism is correct, then the hypothetico-deductive ‘consistency and responsibility to fact’ view of rational inquiry is vanity.

Keywords: theory, fact, logic, contextual political analysis, prediction, hypothetico-deductive, rational inquiry

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.