Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 18 September 2019

Abstract and Keywords

Governments seek to influence behaviour by employing a variety of rule types. These range from formal statutes to rules made under delegated powers to the most informal of administrative prescriptions. These different kinds of rules, in turn, are reinforced with very different responses — from penal threats to administrative sanctions, to mere exhortations. Such variety in rule use has long attracted the attention of legal scholars who have sought to explain and justify rule-making practices, to evaluate processes as well as to explore the implications of choosing different strategies of rule use. This article looks at developing scholarly debates clustered around three themes: explaining choices between rule types; issues of legitimation surrounding governmentally produced rules; and the challenge of making rules that are attuned to new modes of government. Particular attention is then paid to a number of rule-making issues that are likely to be prominent in forthcoming scholarly and policy concerns.

Keywords: rule types, rule use, legitimation, rule-making

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.