Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 26 February 2020

Abstract and Keywords

Despite notable antecedents, as early as Bolzano, analytic philosophy emerged as a movement at the very end of the nineteenth century when Russell and Moore launched an attack on the neo-Hegelian philosophy that was then dominant in Britain. In Russell’s case the revolt came after an extended attempt to construct a neo-Hegelian encyclopaedia of the sciences and focused on the neo-Hegelian treatment of relations. Moore’s engagement with neo-Hegelianism was briefer and less extensive and his critique focused on the vestigial psychologism of Bradley’s treatment of judgement. Though Russell was primarily interested in the philosophy of mathematics and Moore in ethics, they combined to replace neo-Hegelianism by a philosophy that was atomist, direct-realist, and radically anti-psychologistic. The chapter outlines their work as neo-Hegelians, the reasons that led them to change their position, and the broad outlines of their new philosophy.

Keywords: Russell, Moore, neo-Hegelianism, internal and external relations, anti-psychologism, philosophical analyses, transcendental arguments

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.