Abstract and Keywords
Neither the subject of race, nor its racialized subjects, played a significant role in legal scholarship for most of the last century. It was not until relatively recently that legal scholars began seriously to engage matters of race and the experiences of people of color in the United States. This article examines the ways in which scholars have addressed the problem of race in legal theory. In offering this critical overview, it hopes to provide context for ongoing debates about the persistence of racial inequality in American society, to underscore the limitations of earlier theories about race and racial discrimination, and, ultimately, to highlight the promise of engagement with “traditional” legal theories for understanding the nature of racial subordination. First, the article explores legal discourse on race in the years preceding the groundbreaking U.S. Supreme Court decision, Brown v. Board of Education. It then charts the emergence of Critical Race Theory (CRT) before concluding with a discussion of fruitful areas of future study regarding the place of race in American law.
Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.
If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.