Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 13 November 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This chapter examines ethical issues arising from the widespread trend, originated by Jon Kabat-Zinn, toward using mindfulness-based practices, such as meditation, for relief of psychological symptoms, such as anxiety and depression. These techniques are adapted from Buddhist practices and are prescribed for quite different ends—such as enlightenment—in that context. Further, psychotherapeutic mindfulness clients are often not informed of the religious provenance of the techniques. These circumstances give rise to psychotherapeutic ethical considerations, such as whether psychotherapeutic mindfulness practices are problematically appropriative from Buddhism, and whether the religious provenance of the practices should be disclosed to clients. The author argues that while the practices are not problematically appropriative from Buddhists, the failure to disclose the religious origins of the practices violates informed consent obligations owed to clients.

Keywords: mindfulness, informed consent, Buddhism, psychotherapeutic ethics, appropriation, Jon Kabat-Zinn

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.