Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 01 December 2020

(p. 579) References

(p. 579) References

Aarnio, Maria Losonen (2010). ‘Unreasonable knowledge’, Philosophical Perspectives 24: 1–21.Find this resource:

Abe, Nobuhito (2009). ‘The neurobiology of deception: evidence from neuroimaging and loss-of-function studies’, Current Opinion in Neurology 22 (6): 594–600.Find this resource:

Abe, Nobuhito (2011). ‘How the brain shapes deception: an integrated review of the literature’, The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry 17 (5): 560–74.Find this resource:

Abe, Nobuhito, Maki Suzuki, Etsuro Mori, Masatoshi Itoh, and Toshikatsu Fujii (2007). ‘Deceiving others: distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19 (2): 287–95.Find this resource:

Abney, Steven (1996). ‘Statistical Methods and Linguistics’, in Judith L. Klavans and Philip Resnik (eds), The Balancing Act: Combining Symbolic and Statistical Approaches to Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–26.Find this resource:

Abraham, Anna (2013). ‘The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 246.Find this resource:

Abramson, Julia (2005). Learning from Lying. Paradoxes of the Literary Mystification. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Brian P. (1981). ‘Young children’s understanding of a speaker’s intentional use of a false utterance’, Developmental Psychology 17: 472–80.Find this resource:

Adams, Susan and John Jarvis (2006). ‘Indicators of Veracity and Deception: An Analysis of Written Statements Made to Police’, The International Journal of Speech, Language, and the Law 13 (1): 1–22.Find this resource:

Adenzato, Mauro and Rita Bianca Ardito (1999). ‘The role of theory of mind and deontic reasoning in the evolution of deception’, in Martin Hahn and Scott C. Stoness (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 7–12.Find this resource:

Adler, Jonathan (1997). ‘Lying, Deceiving, or Falsely Implicating’, The Journal of Philosophy 94: 435–52.Find this resource:

Aesop (1972). Fables. London: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Agronin, Marc E. (2011). How We Age: A Doctor’s Journey Into the Heart of Growing Old. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Find this resource:

Ahern, Elizabeth C., Thomas D. Lyon, and Jodi A. Quas (2011). ‘Young children’s emerging ability to make false statements’, Developmental Psychology 47 (1): 61–6.Find this resource:

Aitchison, Jean (1996). The Seeds of Speech. Language Origin and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Akimoto, Yoritaka, Shiho Miyazawa, and Toshiaki Muramoto (2012). ‘Comprehension processes of verbal irony: The effects of salience, egocentric context, and allocentric theory of mind’, Metaphor and Symbol 27 (3): 217–42.Find this resource:

(p. 580) Allan, Keith and Kate Burridge (1991). Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Allan, Keith and Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds) (2012). The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Allen, John J., William G. Iacono, and Kurt D. Danielson (1992). ‘The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: a methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences’, Psychophysiology 29 (5): 504–22.Find this resource:

Allhoff, Fritz (2003). ‘Business Bluffing Reconsidered’, Journal of Business Ethics 45: 283–9.Find this resource:

Alston, William P. (1964). Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Find this resource:

Alston, William P. (2000). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Find this resource:

Alterman, Eric (2004). When Presidents Lie: A History of Official Deception and Its Consequences. New York, NY: Viking Books.Find this resource:

Alxatib, Sam and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (2011). ‘The psychology of vagueness: Borderline cases and contradictions’, Mind & Language 26 (3): 287–326.Find this resource:

Amati, Franco, Hanna Oh, Virgina S. Y. Kwan, Kelly Jordan, and Julian P. Keenan (2010). ‘Overclaiming and the medial prefrontal cortex: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study’, Cognitive Neuroscience 1 (4): 268–76.Find this resource:

Ambach, Wolfgang, Rudolf Stark, and Dieter Vaitl (2011). ‘An interfering n-back task facilitates the detection of concealed information with EDA but impedes it with cardiopulmonary physiology’, International Journal of Psychophysiology 80 (3): 217–26.Find this resource:

Amir. (6 July 2008). A comment (in Hebrew). http://www.calcalist.co.il/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/Proc/TalkBacks_iframe/0,9657,L-3087502-68--2,00.html (Retrieved 17 February 2015).

Anolli, Luigi, Michela Balconi, and Rita Ciceri (2003). ‘Linguistic Styles in Deceptive Communication: Dubitative Ambiguity and Elliptical Eluding in Packaged Lies’, Social Behavior and Personality 31 (7): 687–710.Find this resource:

Anon. (1657). A True and Exact Relation of the Strange Finding out of Moses His Tomb. London: Richard Lowndes.Find this resource:

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Philosophy 33: 1–19.Find this resource:

Aquinas, Thomas (1897 [c.1265–73]). Summa theologiae IIaIIae, 110, in S. Thomae de Aquino, Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII edita cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum (‘Editio Leonina’), vol. IX. Roma 1897.Find this resource:

Arciuli, Joanne, David Mallar, and Gina Villar (2010). ‘ “Um, I can tell you’re lying”: Linguistic markers of deception versus truth-telling in speech’, Applied Psycholinguistics 31: 397–411.Find this resource:

Arendt, Hannah (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Find this resource:

Arendt, Hannah (1967). ‘Truth and Politics’, The New Yorker, 25 February.Find this resource:

Arendt, Hannah (1973). ‘Lying in Politics’, in Hannah Arendt, Crises of the Republic. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1–48.Find this resource:

Arico, Adam J. and Don Fallis (2013). ‘Lies, damned lies, and statistics. An empirical investigation of the concept of lying’, Philosophical Psychology 26 (6): 790–816.Find this resource:

Ariel, Mira (2002). ‘The demise of a unique concept of literal meaning’, Journal of Pragmatics 34: 361–402.Find this resource:

Ariel, Mira (2010). Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Aristotle (1971). Metaphysics, Book Γ, Λ, Ε. Trans. C. Kirwan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Aristotle (1985). Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Terence Irwin. Cambridge: Hackett.Find this resource:

(p. 581) Aristotle (2010 [230 bc]). Rhetoric. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. ReadaClassic.com.

Armstrong, D. M. (2004). ‘Going through the Open Door Again’, in John Collins, Ned Hall, and Laurie A. Paul (eds), Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 445–58.Find this resource:

Aron, Adam R., Trevor W. Robbins, and Russell A. Poldrack (2004). ‘Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (4): 170–7.Find this resource:

Aron, Adam R., Trevor W. Robbins, and Russell A. Poldrack (2014). ‘Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18 (4): 177–85.Find this resource:

Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides (2013). ‘Strategic conversation’, Semantics and Pragmatics 6, Article 2: 1–62.Find this resource:

Ashton, Michael C. and Kibeom Lee (2007). ‘Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 11: 150–66.Find this resource:

Astington, Janet Wilde and Jennifer M. Jenkins (1999). ‘A longitudinal study of the relationship between language and theory-of-mind development’, Developmental Psychology 35: 1311–20.Find this resource:

Attardo, Salvatore (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. New York, NY: Mouton.Find this resource:

Attardo, Salvatore (2001). Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. New York, NY: De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Attardo, Salvatore and Victor Raskin (1991). ‘Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model’, Humor 4: 293–348.Find this resource:

Augustine (1952a). ‘Against lying’, in Roy J. Deferrari (ed.), Treatises on Various Subjects (Vol. 16). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 125–79.Find this resource:

Augustine (1952b). ‘Lying’, in Roy J. Deferrari (ed.), Treatises on Various Subjects (Vol. 16). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 53–120.Find this resource:

Augustine (1961). Enchiridion, Henry Paoluccci (ed.). Chicago, IL: Regnery.Find this resource:

Aune, R. Kelly and Linda L. Walters (1994). ‘Cultural Differences in Deception: Motivations to Deceive in Samoans and North Americans’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations 18 (2): 159–72.Find this resource:

Austin, J. L. (1946). Other Minds. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 20:1.Find this resource:

Austin, John L. (1950). ‘Truth’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 24 (1): 111–28.Find this resource:

Austin, John L. (1958). ‘Pretending’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 32. London: Harrison and Sons, 261–78.Find this resource:

Austin, John L. ([1962a] 1976). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2nd edn 1976.Find this resource:

Austin, John L. (1962b). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ayasse, Manfred, Johannes Stökl, and Wittko Francke (2011). ‘Chemical ecology and pollinator-driven speciation in sexually deceptive orchids’, Phytochemistry 72 (13): 1667–77.Find this resource:

Bach, Kent (2001). ‘You don’t say?’, Synthese 128: 15–44.Find this resource:

Bach, Kent (2013). ‘Odds & Ends (loose/deep/dead)’, Expanded handout for the New Work on Speech Acts Conference, Columbia University, 27–29 Sept, 2013.Find this resource:

Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Backbier, Esther, Johan Hoogstraten, and Katharina M. Terwogt-Kouwenhoven (1997). ‘Situational determinants of the acceptability of telling lies’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27 (12): 1048–62.Find this resource:

Bacon, Francis (2015 [1612]). ‘On Simulation and Dissimulation’, in Alfred S. West (ed.), Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–17.Find this resource:

(p. 582) Baddeley, Alan D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Bagley, Janice and Leon Manelis (1979). ‘Effect of awareness on an indicator of cognitive load’, Perceptual and Motor Skills 49: 591–4.Find this resource:

Baier, Annette (1986). ‘Trust and Anti-Trust’, Ethics 96 (2): 231–60.Find this resource:

Baima, Nicholas (2017). ‘Republic 382a–d: On the Dangers and Benefits of Falsehood’, Classical Philology 112: 1–19.Find this resource:

Baker-Hytch, Max and Matthew A. Benton (2015). ‘Defeatism Defeated’, Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1): 40–66.Find this resource:

Bakir, Vian (2010). Sousveillance, Media and Strategic Political Communication: Iraq, USA, UK. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Find this resource:

Bakir, Vian (2013). Torture, Intelligence and Sousveillance in the War on Terror: Agenda-building Struggles. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Bakir, Vian and David M. Barlow (eds) (2007). Communication in the Age of Suspicion: Trust and the Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

Bakir, Vian, David Miller, Eric Herring, and Piers Robinson (2015). ‘Rethinking propaganda as a sub-set of organised persuasive communication’. Unpublished working paper, Bangor, UK.Find this resource:

Balliet, Daniel (2010). ‘Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analytic Review’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (1): 39–57.Find this resource:

Bandler, Richard and John Grinder (1979). Frogs into Princes. Moab, UT: Real People Press.Find this resource:

Barbe, Katharina (1993). ‘ “Isn’t it ironic that … ?”: explicit irony markers’, Journal of Pragmatics 20: 578–90.Find this resource:

Barker, Stephen (2004). Renewing Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Barnes, Annette (1997). Seeing through Self-deception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Barnes, John A. (1994). A Pack of Lies: Towards a Sociology of Lying. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Barnlund, Dean C. (1973). Public and Private Self in Japan and the United States. Tokyo: The Simul Press Inc.Find this resource:

Baron-Cohen, Simon (1992). ‘The theory of mind hypothesis of autism: History and prospects of the idea’, The Psychologist 5: 9–12.Find this resource:

Baron-Cohen, Simon (1999). ‘The evolution of a theory of mind?’, in Michael Corballis and Stephen E. G. Lea (eds), The Descent of Mind: Psychological Perspectives on Hominid Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 261–83.Find this resource:

Baron-Cohen, Simon, Alan M. Leslie, and Uta Frith (1985). ‘Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?’, Cognition 21 (1): 37–46.Find this resource:

Barr, Dale J. and Boaz Keysar (2002). ‘Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents’, Journal of Memory and Language 46 (2): 391–418.Find this resource:

Barr, Dale J. and Boaz Keysar (2006). ‘Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use’, in Matthew J. Traxler and Morton A. Gernsbacher (eds), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 901–38.Find this resource:

Barr, John McKee (2014). Loathing Lincoln. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Find this resource:

Barrios, Veronica, Virginia S. Y. Kwan, Giorgio Ganis, Jaime Gorman, Jennifer Romanowski, and Julian P. Keenan (2008). ‘Elucidating the neural correlates of egoistic and moralistic self-enhancement’, Consciousness and Cognition 17 (2): 451–6.Find this resource:

Bauer, Matthias and Sigrid Beck (2014). ‘On the Meaning of Fictional Texts’, in Daniel Gutzmann, Jan Köpping, and Cécile Meier (eds), Approaches to Meaning. Leiden: Brill, 250–75.Find this resource:

(p. 583) Baumgartner, Thomas, Lorena R. Gianotti, and Daria Knoch (2013). ‘Who is honest and why: Baseline activation in anterior insula predicts inter-individual differences in deceptive behavior’, Biological Psychology 94 (1): 192–7.Find this resource:

Baumgartner, Thomas, Urs Fischbacher, Anja Feierabend, Kai Lutz, and Ernst Fehr (2009). ‘The neural circuitry of a broken promise’, Neuron 64 (5): 756–70.Find this resource:

Bavelas, Janet Beavin (1983). ‘Situations that lead to disqualifications’, Human Communication Research 9: 130–45.Find this resource:

Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Alex Black, Nicole Chovil, and Jennifer Mullett (1990). Equivocal Communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Find this resource:

Bazzanella, Carla (2009). ‘Approssimazioni pragmatiche e testuali alla menzogna’ (Pragmatic and textual approaches to the concept of lying), in Federica Venier (ed.), Tra Pragmatica e Linguistica testuale. Ricordando Maria-Elisabeth Conte. Alessandria: Dell’Orso, 67–90.Find this resource:

Bazzanella, Carla, Claudia Caffi, and Marina Sbisà (1991). ‘Scalar dimensions of illocutionary force’, in Igor Ž. Žagar (ed.), Speech Acts: Fiction or Reality. Antwerp, Ljubljana: IPrA Distribution Center for Yugoslavia and Institute for Social Sciences, 63–76.Find this resource:

Beach, John (1985). ‘Bluffing: Its Demise as a Subject into Itself’, Journal of Business Ethics 4: 191–6.Find this resource:

Beardsley, Monroe Curtis (1958). Aesthetics. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.Find this resource:

Beaver, David and Bart Geurts (2011). ‘Presupposition’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online publication [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/presupposition].Find this resource:

Becker, Jurek (1999 [1969]). Jacob the Liar. Trans. Leila Vennewitz. London: Penguin (original German edn Jakob der Lügner. 1969).Find this resource:

Beebee, Helen (2004). ‘Causing and Nothingness’, in John Collins, Ned Hall, and Laurie A. Paul (eds), Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 291–308.Find this resource:

Beeman, William O. (1986). Language, Status, and Power in Iran. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Find this resource:

Beier, Kathi (2010). Selbsttäuschung. Berlin and New York, NY: De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Belfiore, Elizabeth (1985). ‘ “Lies Unlike the Truth”: Plato on Hesiod, Theogony 27’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 115: 47–57.Find this resource:

Bell, Kathy L. and Bella M. DePaulo (1996). ‘Liking and Lying’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 18: 243–66.Find this resource:

Belot, Michèle and Jeroen van de Ven (2017). ‘How private is private information? The ability to spot deception in an economic game’, Experimental Economics 20 (1): 19–43.Find this resource:

Bennett, Lerone (2007). Forced Into Glory: Abraham Lincoln’s White Dream. Chicago, IL: Johnson Publishing Company.Find this resource:

Ben-Shakhar, Gershon and Eitan Elaad (2003). ‘The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review’, Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (1): 131–51.Find this resource:

Ben-Shakhar, Gershon and John J. Furedy (1990). Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psychophysiological and International Perspective. New York, NY: Springer.Find this resource:

Benton, Matthew A. (2011). ‘Two More for the Knowledge Account of Assertion’, Analysis 71: 684–7.Find this resource:

Benton, Matthew A. (2014). ‘Knowledge Norms’, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online. Available at http://www.iep.utm.edu/kn-norms/.

Benton, Matthew A. (2016). ‘Gricean Quality’, Noûs 50 (4), 689–703.Find this resource:

Benton, Matthew A. (2018). Lying, Accuracy, and Credence. Analysis.Find this resource:

(p. 584) Benton, Matthew A. (Forthcoming). Knowledge and Language. Unpublished ms., Seattle, WA.Find this resource:

Benton, Matthew A. and John Turri (2014). ‘Iffy Predictions and Proper Expectations’, Synthese 191: 1857–66.Find this resource:

Berger, Lee R., John Hawks, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Steven E. Churchill, Peter Schmid, Lucas K. Delezene, et al. (2015). ‘Homo naledi, a new species of the genus Homo from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa’, eLife 4.Find this resource:

Bermúdez, José Luis (2000). ‘Self-deception, intentions, and contrary beliefs’, Analysis 60: 309–19.Find this resource:

Berry, Dianne C., Peter R. Knapp, and Theo Raynor (2002). ‘Is 15% very common? Informing people about the risk of medication side effects’, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 10: 145–51.Find this resource:

Bertucelli Papi, Marcella (2014). ‘The pragmatics of insinuation’, Intercultural Pragmatics 11 (1): 1–29.Find this resource:

Besnier, Niko (1994). ‘Christianity, Authority, and Personhood: Sermonic Discourse on Nukulaelae Atoll’, Journal of the Polynesian Society 103 (4): 339–378.Find this resource:

Bhatt, Meghana A., Terry Lohrenz, Colin F. Camerer, and P. Read Montague (2010). ‘Neural Signatures of Strategic Types in a Two-Person Bargaining Game’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 19720–5.Find this resource:

Bibas, Stephanos (2004). ‘Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of the Trial’, Harvard Law Review 117: 2463–547.Find this resource:

Birch, Susan A. J., Nazanin Akmal, and Kristen L. Frampton (2010). ‘Two-Year-Olds Are Vigilant of Others’ Non-Verbal Cues to Credibility’, Developmental Science 13 (2): 363–9.Find this resource:

Birner, Betty J. and Gregory Ward (1998).Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bittner, Rüdiger (1988). ‘Understanding a Self-deceiver’, in Brian P. McLaughlin and Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds), Perspectives on Self-deception. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 535–51.Find this resource:

Black, Max (1983). ‘The prevalence of humbug’, in his The Prevalence of Humbug and Other Essays. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 115–46.Find this resource:

Blackwell, Natalia and Jean E. Fox Tree (2012). ‘Social factors affect quotative choice’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1150–62.Find this resource:

Blommaert, Jan (2005). ‘Why we are as good or bad as our language’, Guardian Weekly, Learning English Supplement (21 Oct., 7).Find this resource:

Bloom, Harold (2010). The Trickster. New York, NY: Bloom’s Literary Criticism.Find this resource:

Bloomquist, Jennifer (2009). ‘Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Study of Categorical Misdeeds’, Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1595–605.Find this resource:

Blum, Susan D. (2005). ‘Five Approaches to Explaining “Truth” and “Deception” in Human Communication’, Journal of Anthropological Research 61 (3): 289–315.Find this resource:

Blum, Susan, D. (2007). Lies that Bind: Chinese Truth, Other Truths. Lanham, MD: Rownan & Littlefield.Find this resource:

Blume, Andreas, Douglas V. DeJong, Yong Gwan Kim, and Geoffrey B. Sprinkle (1998). ‘Experimental Evidence on the Evolution of the Meaning of Messages in Sender-Receiver Games’, American Economic Review 88: 1323–40.Find this resource:

Blume, Andreas, Douglas V. DeJong, Yong Gwan Kim, Geoffrey B. Sprinkle (2001). ‘Evolution of Communication with Partial Common Interest’, Games and Economic Behavior 37: 79–120.Find this resource:

(p. 585) BNC = British National Corpus. (2001). Version 2. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium.Find this resource:

Bok, Sissela (1999). Lying. Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Find this resource:

Bolhuis, Johan J. (2015). ‘Evolution cannot explain how minds work’, Behavioural Processes 117: 82–91.Find this resource:

Bolinger, Dwight (1980). Language, the Loaded Weapon. New York, NY: Longman.Find this resource:

Bond, Charles F. and Bella M. DePaulo (2006). ‘Accuracy of deception judgments’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 10 (3): 214–34.Find this resource:

Bond, Gary D. (2008). ‘Deception detection expertise’, Law and Human Behavior 32 (4): 339–51.Find this resource:

Bonomi, Andrea and Sandro Zucchi (2003). ‘A pragmatic framework for truth in fiction’, Dialectica 57 (2): 103–20.Find this resource:

Borg, Emma (2012). Pursuing Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Borge, Steffen (2003). ‘The Myth of Self-deception’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 41: 1–28.Find this resource:

Börjesson, Kristin (2014). The Semantics-Pragmatics Controversy. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bosco, Francesca M. and Monica Bucciarelli (2008). ‘Simple and Complex Deceits and Ironies’, Journal of Pragmatics 40: 583–607.Find this resource:

Boxer, Diana and Florencia Cortés-Conde (1997). ‘From Bonding and Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display’, Journal of Pragmatics 27: 275–95.Find this resource:

Bradac, James J., Evan Friedman, and Howard Giles (1986). ‘A social approach to propositional communication. Speakers lie to hearers’, in Graham McGregor (ed.), Language for Hearers. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 127–51.Find this resource:

Bradlee, Ben (1995). A Good Life: Newspapering and Other Adventures. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Find this resource:

Brandom, Robert B. (1994). Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Brandom, Robert B. (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Brandt, Richard (1979). A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Bratman, Michael (1993). ‘Shared Intention’, Ethics 104: 97–113.Find this resource:

Braun, David (2005). ‘Empty names, fictional names, mythical names’, Noûs 39 (4): 596–631.Find this resource:

Brewer, Gayle and Loren Abell (2015). ‘Machiavellianism and Sexual Behavior: Motivations, Deception, and Infidelity’, Personality and Individual Differences 74: 186–91.Find this resource:

Brewer, Marilynn and Ya-Ru Chen (2007). ‘Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism’, Psychological Review 114 (1): 133–51.Find this resource:

Brickhouse, Thomas C. and Nicholas D. Smith (1983). ‘Justice and Dishonesty in Plato’s Republic’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 21: 79–96.Find this resource:

Brickhouse, Thomas C. and Nicholas D. Smith (2000). The Philosophy of Socrates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Find this resource:

Brooks, D. (1989, October 5). ‘Journalists and others for saving the planet’, The Wall Street Journal, A28: 3.Find this resource:

Brown, Jessica and Herman Cappelen (2011). ‘Assertion: An Introduction and Overview’, in Jessica Brown and Herman Cappelen (eds), Assertion. New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–17.Find this resource:

(p. 586) Brown, Penelope (2002). ‘Everyone Has to Lie in Tzeltal’, in Shoshana Blum-Kulka and Catherine E. Snow (eds), Talking to Adults: The Contribution of Multiparty Discourse to Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 241–75.Find this resource:

Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Peter, Thomas Sutikna, Michael J. Morwood, Raden P. Soejono, Jatmiko, E. Wayhu Saptomo, et al. (2004). ‘A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia’, Nature 431 (7012): 1055–61.Find this resource:

Brown, Roger (1958). Words and Things. New York, NY: Free Press.Find this resource:

Brown, Stephen Rex (2014). ‘Upstate NY Man Wrongly Convicted of Rape wins $41.6M Lawsuit; Lawyers Say It’s Largest Sum in U.S. History. New York Daily News. Retrieved from: nydn.us/1FKZieS. Thursday, October 23, 2014.Find this resource:

Brown-Schmidt, Sarah, Christine Gunlogson, and Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). ‘Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during intercative conversation’, Cognition 107 (3): 1122–34.Find this resource:

Brugioni, Dino A. (1999). Photo Fakery. A History of Deception and Manipulation. Dulles, VA: Brassey’s Inc.Find this resource:

Bryan, Christopher J., Gabrielle S. Adams, and Benoît Monin (2013). ‘When Cheating Would Make You a Cheater: Implicating the Self Prevents Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (4): 1001–5.Find this resource:

Bryant, Erin (2008). ‘Real lies, white lies and gray lies: Towards a typology of deception’, Kaleidoscope 7: 23–50.Find this resource:

Bryant, Gregory A. and Jean E. Fox Tree (2002). ‘Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech’, Metaphor and Symbol 17: 99–117.Find this resource:

Buckwalter, Wesley and John Turri (2014). ‘Telling, Showing, and Knowing: A Unified Theory of Pedagogical Norms’, Analysis 74: 16–20.Find this resource:

Buller, David B. and Judee K. Burgoon (1996). ‘Interpersonal deception theory’, Communication Theory 6 (3): 203–42.Find this resource:

Burge, Tyler (1993). ‘Content Preservation’, Philosophical Review 101: 457–488.Find this resource:

Burkett, James P., Elissar Andari, Zachary V. Johnson, Daniel Curry, Frans B. M. de Waal, and Larry J. Young (2016). ‘Oxytocin-dependent consolation behavior in rodents’, Science 351 (6271): 375–8.Find this resource:

Burks, Arthur W. (1946). ‘Empiricism and vagueness’, The Journal of Philosophy 43 (18): 477–86.Find this resource:

Burnett, Heather (2016). Gradability in Natural Language: Logical and Grammatical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Burnyeat, Myles F. (1997). ‘The Impiety of Socrates’, Ancient Philosophy 17: 1–12.Find this resource:

Bursztyn, Leonardo, Florian Ederer, Bruno Ferman, and Noam Yuchtman (2014). ‘Understanding peer effects in financial decisions: Evidence from a field experiment’, Econometrica 82 (4): 1273–301.Find this resource:

Burton-Roberts, Noël (2010). ‘Cancellation and Intention’, in Belén Soria and Esther Romero (eds), Explicit Communication. Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 138–55.Find this resource:

Burton-Roberts, Noël (2013). ‘On Grice and cancellation’, Journal of Pragmatics 48 (1): 17–28.Find this resource:

Bush, George W. (2010). Decision Points. New York, NY: Crown.Find this resource:

Bussey, Kay (1992). ‘Lying and truthfulness: Children’s definitions, standards, and evaluative reactions’, Child Development 63 (1): 129–37.Find this resource:

Bussey, Kay (1999). ‘Children’s categorization and evaluation of different types of lies and truths’, Child Development 70 (6): 1338–47.Find this resource:

(p. 587) Butterfill, Stephen A. and Ian A. Apperly (2013). ‘How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind’, Mind & Language 28: 606–37.Find this resource:

Byrne, Christopher C. and Jeffrey A. Kurland (2001). ‘Self-deception in an evolutionary game’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 212 (4): 457–80.Find this resource:

Byrne, Richard W. and Nadia Corp (2004). ‘Neocortex size predicts deception rate in primates’, Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 271 (1549): 1693–9.Find this resource:

Caffi, Claudia (2007). Mitigation. London: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Cai, Hongbin and Joseph Tao-Yi Wang (2006). ‘Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games’, Games and Economic Behavior 56: 7–36.Find this resource:

Caldwell, H. Mitchell (2012). ‘Coercive Plea Bargaining: The Unrecognized Scourge of the Justice System’, Catholic University Law Review 61: 63–96.Find this resource:

Call, Josep and Michael Tomasello (1999). ‘A nonverbal false belief task: the performance of children and great apes’, Child Development 70 (2): 381–95.Find this resource:

Call, Josep and Michael Tomasello (2008). ‘Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (5): 187–92.Find this resource:

Callaway, Ewen, Thomas Sutikna, Richard Roberts, Wahyu Saptomo, Peter Brown, Henry Gee, et al. (2014). ‘The discovery of Homo floresiensis: Tales of the hobbit’, Nature 514 (7523): 422–6.Find this resource:

Camden, Carl, Michael T. Motley, and Ann Wilson (1984). ‘White Lies in Interpersonal Communication: A Taxonomy and Preliminary Investigation of Social Motivations’, The Western Journal of Speech Communication 48 (4): 309–25.Find this resource:

Camerer, Colin F., Jonathan D. Cohen, Ernst Fehr, Paul W. Glimcher, and David Laibson. (2016). ‘Neuroeconomics’, in John Kagel and Alvin Roth (eds), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 153–216.Find this resource:

Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello (2003). ‘A construction based analysis of child directed speech’, Cognitive Science 27 (6): 843–73.Find this resource:

Campbell, John D. and Albert N. Katz (2012). ‘Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony?’, Discourse Processes 49: 459–80.Find this resource:

Cano Mora, Laura (2006). ‘How to Make a Mountain out of a Molehill’: A Corpus-Based Pragmatic and Conversational Analysis Study of Hyperbole in Interaction. Doctoral Thesis. Universitat de Valencia: Servei de Publicacions.Find this resource:

Caplan, Jason P., Jonathan F. Borus, Grace Chang, and William E. Greenberg (2008). ‘Poor Intentions or Poor Attention: Misrepresentation by Applicants to Psychiatry Residency’, Academic Psychiatry 32: 225–9.Find this resource:

Cappelen, Alexander, Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden (2013). ‘When do we lie?’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 93: 258–65.Find this resource:

Cappelen, Herman and Jessica Brown (2009). Assertion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore (1997). ‘Varieties of quotation’, Mind 106 (423): 429–50.Find this resource:

Carenini, Giuseppe and Johanna D. Moore (2006). ‘Generating and Evaluating Evaluative Arguments’, Artificial Intelligence 170: 925–52.Find this resource:

Carlson, Stephanie M., Louis J. Moses, and Laura J. Claxton (2004). ‘Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability’, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 87 (4): 299–319.Find this resource:

Carlson, Stephanie M., Louis J. Moses, and Hollie R. Hix (1998). ‘The role of inhibitory processes in young children’s difficulties with deception and false belief’, Child Development 69 (3): 672–91.Find this resource:

Carmola, Kateri (2003). ‘Noble Lying: Justice and Intergenerational Tension in Plato’s Republic’, Political Theory 31: 39–62.Find this resource:

(p. 588) Carr, Albert Z. (1968). ‘Is Business Bluffing Ethical?’, Harvard Business Review 46: 143–53.Find this resource:

Carrión, Ricardo E., Julian P. Keenan, and Natalie Sebanz (2010). ‘A truth that’s told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception’, Cognition 114 (1): 105–10.Find this resource:

Carson, Thomas L. (1993). ‘Second Thoughts about Bluffing’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3: 317–41.Find this resource:

Carson, Thomas L. (2006). ‘The Definition of Lying’, Noûs 40 (2): 284–306.Find this resource:

Carson, Thomas L. (2010). Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Carson, Thomas L. (2015). Lincoln’s Ethics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Carson, Thomas L. (2016). ‘Frankfurt and Cohen on Bullshit, Bullshitting, Deception, Lying, and Concern with the Truth of What One Says’, Pragmatics & Cognition 23: 54–68.Find this resource:

Carson, Thomas L., Richard E. Wokutch, and Kent F. Murrmann (1982). ‘Bluffing in Labor Negotiations: Legal and Ethical Issues’, Journal of Business Ethics 1: 13–22.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn (1996). ‘Metalinguistic negation and echoic use’, Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 309–30.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn (2002). Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Carston, Robyn and Catherine Wearing (2011). ‘Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach’, Language and Cognition 3 (2): 283–312.Find this resource:

Carter, C. Sue, Jessie R. Williams, Danie M. Witt, and Thomas R. Insel (1992). ‘Oxytocin and social bonding’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 652: 204–11.Find this resource:

Carter, Cameron S. and Vincent van Veen (2007). ‘Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data’, Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 7 (4): 367–79.Find this resource:

Caso, Letizia, Augusto Gnisci, Aldert Vrij, and Samantha Mann (2005). ‘Processes underlying deception: an empirical analysis of truth and lies when manipulating the stakes’, Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 2 (3): 195–202.Find this resource:

Castelfranchi, Cristiano and Isabella Poggi (1994). ‘Lying as pretending to give information’, in H. Parret (ed.), Pretending to Communicate, Berlin and New York, NY: De Gruyter, 276–90.Find this resource:

Castells, Manuel (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Caucci, Gina M. and Roger J. Kreuz (2012). ‘Social and paralinguistic cues to sarcasm’, Humor 25: 1–22.Find this resource:

Cecílio, Pedro, Begoña Pérez-Cabezas, Nuno Santarém, Joana Maciel, Vasco Rodrigues, and Anabela Cordeiro-da-Silva (2014). ‘Deception and manipulation: the arms of leishmania, a successful parasite’, Frontiers in Immunology 5: 480.Find this resource:

Chan, Timothy and Guy Kahane (2011). ‘The trouble with being sincere’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41(2): 215–34.Find this resource:

Channell, Joanna (1985). ‘Vagueness as a conversational strategy’, Nottingham Linguistic Circular 14: 3–24.Find this resource:

Channell, Joanna (1994). Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Chapman, Robert M. and Henry R. Bragdon (1964). ‘Evoked Responses to Numerical and Non-Numerical Visual Stimuli While Problem Solving’, Nature 203: 1155–7.Find this resource:

Chapman, Siobhan (1993). ‘Metalinguistic negation, sentences and utterances’, Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 74–94.Find this resource:

Chapman, Siobhan (1996). ‘Some observations on metalinguistic negation’, Journal of Linguistics 32: 387–402.Find this resource:

Charness, Gary and Martin Dufwenberg (2006). ‘Promises and Partnership’, Econometrica 74: 1579–601.Find this resource:

(p. 589) Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2005). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

Chase, Jefferson S. (1993). ‘Lying in Swift’s “Gulliver’s Travels” and Heine’s “Atta Troll” ’, Comparative Literature 45: 330–45.Find this resource:

Chen, Rong, Chunmei Hu, and Lin He (2013). ‘Lying between English and Chinese: An intercultural comparative study’, Intercultural pragmatics: 10 (3): 375–401.Find this resource:

Cheney, Karen L. and Isabelle M. Côté (2005). ‘Frequency-dependent success of aggressive mimics in a cleaning symbiosis’, Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 272 (1581): 2635–9.Find this resource:

Cherry, E. Colin (1953). ‘Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears’, Journal of Acoustic Society of America 25: 975–9.Find this resource:

Chisholm, Roderick M. and Thomas D. Feehan (1977). ‘The intent to deceive’, The Journal of Philosophy 74 (3): 143–59.Find this resource:

Chouliaraki, Lilie and Norman Fairclough (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Christ, Shawn E., David C. Van Essen, Jason M. Watson, Lindsay E. Brubaker, and Kathleen B. McDermott (2009). ‘The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses’, Cerebral Cortex 19 (7): 1557–66.Find this resource:

Christian, Sue Ellen (2013). ‘Cognitive biases and errors as cause—and Journalistic best practices as effect’, Journal of Mass Media Ethics 28: 160–74.Find this resource:

Chuang, Rueyling (2003). ‘A postmodern critique of cross-cultural and intercultural communication research’, in William J. Starosta and Guo-ming Chen (eds), Ferment in the intercultural field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 24–53.Find this resource:

CIA (US Central Intelligence Agency) (2013). Memorandum for The Honorable Dianne Feinstein, The Honorable Saxby Chambliss. CIA Comments on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Report on the Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation Program, 27 June.Find this resource:

Cialdini, Robert B. and Noah J. Goldstein (2004). ‘Social influence: Compliance and conformity’, Annual Review of Psychology 55 (1): 591–621.Find this resource:

Cialdini, Robert B., Jessica Li, and Adriana Samper (2015). The varied internal costs of unethical leadership: Performance decrements, turnover intentions, and the selective attrition effect. Unpublished ms.Find this resource:

Claridge, Claudia (2011). Hyperbole in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. and Brennan, Susan E. (1991). ‘Grounding in Communication’, in Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley (eds), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC: APA Books, 127–49.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. and Jean E. Fox-Tree (2002). ‘Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking’, Cognition 84 (1): 73–111.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig (1984). ‘On the pretense theory of irony’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 121–6.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig (1990). ‘Quotations as demonstrations’, Language 66: 764–805.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. and Gregory L. Murphy (1982). ‘Audience design in meaning and reference’, in Jean-Francois Le Ny and Walter Kintsch (eds), Language and Comprehension. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 287–99.Find this resource:

Clément, Fabrice, Melissa A. Koenig, and Paul L. Harris (2004). ‘The Ontogenesis of Trust’, Mind & Language 19 (4): 360–79.Find this resource:

(p. 590) Clements, Wendy A. and Josef Perner (1994). ‘Implicit understanding of belief’, Cognitive Development 9: 377–95.Find this resource:

Cliffe, Lionel, Maureen Ramsay, and Dave Bartlett (2000). The Politics of Lying. Implications for Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Find this resource:

Coady, Cecil Anthony John (1992). Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Coates, Jennifer (1987). ‘Epistemic modality and spoken discourse’, Transactions of the Philological Society 85 (1): 110–31.Find this resource:

Cobreros, Pablo, Paul Egré, David Ripley, and Robert van Rooij (2012). ‘Tolerant, Classical, Strict’, The Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2): 347–85.Find this resource:

Cobreros, Pablo, Paul Egré, David Ripley, and Robert van Rooij (2015). ‘Pragmatic interpretations of vague expressions: Strongest meaning and nonmonotonic consequence’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (4): 375–93.Find this resource:

Cohen, Gerald A. (2002). ‘Deeper into bullshit’, in Sarah Buss and Lee Overton (eds), Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 321–39.Find this resource:

Cohen, Jonathan D., Kevin Dunbar, and James L. McClelland (1990). ‘On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect’, Psychological Review 97: 332–61.Find this resource:

Colb, Sherry F. (2013). ‘Rape by Deception, Rape by Impersonation, and a New California Bill’, Justia.com May 1.Find this resource:

Cole, Shirley A. N. (1996). ‘Semantic Prototypes and the Pragmatics of Lie Across Cultures’, The LACUS Forum 23: 475–83.Find this resource:

Coleman, Linda (2007). ‘True Lies: Collusion, Evasion, and the Assignment of Responsibility in Cases of Misrepresentation’, in Jochen Mecke (ed.), Cultures of Lying: Theories and Practice of Lying in Society, Literature, and Film. Berlin–Madison, WI: Galda + Wilch, 47–68.Find this resource:

Coleman, Linda and Paul Kay (1981). ‘Prototype Semantics: The English Word lie,’ Language 57 (1): 26–44.Find this resource:

College of William and Mary (1736). ‘Statutes of the College of William and Mary in Virginia’, Bulletin of the College of William and Mary 7: 13–14.Find this resource:

Collodi, Carlo (1988 [1881]). The Adventures of Pinocchio. Trans. Carol della Chiesa. New York, NY: Knopf (original Italian ed.: Le avventure di Pinocchio, 1881).Find this resource:

Colston, Herbert L. and Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr (2002). ‘Are irony and metaphor understood differently?’, Metaphor and Symbol 17 (1): 57–80.Find this resource:

Colston, Herbert L. and Shana B. Keller (1998). ‘You’ll Never Believe This: Irony and Hyperbole in Expressing Surprise’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27: 499–513.Find this resource:

Colston, Herbert L. and Jennifer O’Brien (2000). ‘Contrast of Kind Versus Contrast of Magnitude: The Pragmatic Accomplishments of Irony and Hyperbole’, Discourse Processes 30: 179–99.Find this resource:

Cook, Amy E. and Antje S. Meyer (2008). ‘Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34 (4): 886.Find this resource:

Coons, Christian and Michael Weber (eds) (2014). Manipulation. Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Corner, John (2007). ‘Mediated Politics, Promotional Culture and the Idea of Propaganda’, Media, Culture and Society 29 (3): 669–77.Find this resource:

Corriveau, Kathleen and Paul L. Harris (2009). ‘Preschoolers Continue to Trust a More Accurate Informant 1 Week After Exposure to Accuracy Information’, Developmental Science 12 (1): 188–93.Find this resource:

(p. 591) Corriveau, Kathleen and Paul L. Harris (2010). ‘Young Children’s Trust in What Other People Say’, in Ken J. Rotenberg (ed.), Interpersonal Trust During Childhood and Adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 87–109.Find this resource:

Coupland, Nicolas (2004). ‘Stylised Deception’, in Adam C. Jaworski, Nicolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasiński (eds), Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter, 259–74.Find this resource:

Crawford, Vincent P. (1998). ‘A survey of experiments on communication via cheap talk’, Journal of Economic Theory 78 (2): 286–98.Find this resource:

Crawford, Vincent P. and Joel Sobel (1982). ‘Strategic Information Transmission’, Econometrica 50 (6): 1431–51.Find this resource:

Culbertson, Hugh M. and Nancy Somerick (1976). ‘Quotation marks and bylines—what do they mean to readers?’, Journalism Quarterly 53: 463–9, 508.Find this resource:

Cummings, Louise (ed.) (2012). The Pragmatics Encyclopedia. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Cuneo, Terence (2015). Speech and Morality: On the Metaethical Implications of Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Currie, Gregory (1990). The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

D’Agostini, Franca (2012). Menzogna (Lying). Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.Find this resource:

Dale, Anders M. (1999). ‘Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI’, Human Brain Mapping 8: 109–14.Find this resource:

Dallek, Robert (1979). Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy 1932-1945. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary, Makoto Kanazawa, Yookyung Kim, Sam Mchombo, and Stanley Peters (1998). ‘Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21(2): 159–210.Find this resource:

Danks, Joseph H. (1970). ‘Encoding of novel figures for communication and memory’, Cognitive Psychology 1 (2): 171–91.Find this resource:

Danziger, Eve (2010). ‘On trying and lying: Cultural configurations of Grice’s Maxim of Quality’, Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (2): 199–219.Find this resource:

Darwin, Charles (1877). ‘A biographical sketch of an infant’, Mind 2 (7): 285–94.Find this resource:

Dasgupta, Purnamita, John Morton, David Dodman, Barış Karapinar, Francisco Meza, Marta G. Rivera-Ferre, et al. (2014). ‘Rural areas’, in Christopher B. Field, Vincente R. Barros, David Jon Dokken, Katharine J. Mach, Michael D. Mastrandrea, T. Eren Bilir, et al. (eds), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 613–57.Find this resource:

Da Silva, Cayla S. and Amy-May Leach (2013). ‘Detecting Deception in Second-Language Speakers’, Legal and Criminological Psychology 18: 115–27.Find this resource:

Davatzikos, Christos, Kosha Ruparel, Yong Fan, Dinggang Shen, Mausumi Acharyya, James W. Loughead, et al. (2005). ‘Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: application to lie detection’, NeuroImage 28 (3): 663–8.Find this resource:

Davidson, Donald (1973). ‘Radical Interpretation’, Dialectica 27: 314–28.Find this resource:

Davidson, Donald (1978). ‘What metaphors mean’, Critical Inquiry 5 (1): 31–47.Find this resource:

Davidson, Donald (1985). ‘Deception and Division’, in Jon Elster (ed.), The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79–92.Find this resource:

Davidson, Donald (1989). ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’, in Ernie LePore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. New York, NY: Blackwell, 307–19.Find this resource:

(p. 592) Davidson, Donald (2004a). ‘Paradoxes of Irrationality’, in Donald Davidson, Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 169–88.Find this resource:

Davidson, Donald (2004b). ‘Deception and Division’, in Donald Davidson, Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 199–212.Find this resource:

Davidson, Donald (2004c). ‘Who is Fooled?’, in Donald Davidson, Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 213–30.Find this resource:

Davis, Wayne (1998). Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Debey, Evelyne, Jan De Houwer, and Bruno Verschuere (2014). ‘Lying relies on the truth’, Cognition 132 (3): 324–34.Find this resource:

Debey, Evelyne, Bruno Verschuere, and Geert Crombez (2012). ‘Lying and executive control: An experimental investigation using ego depletion and goal neglect’, Acta Psychologica 140 (2): 133–41.Find this resource:

De Brabanter, Philippe and Patrick Dendale (2008). ‘Commitment: The Term and the Notions’, Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 1–14.Find this resource:

Defoe, Daniel (2008 [1719–20]). Robinson Crusoe. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press (first British ed. 1719–20).Find this resource:

Dell, Gary S. (1984). ‘The representation of serial order in speech: Evidence from phoneme effect in speech errors’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Memory & Cognition 10: 222–33.Find this resource:

Delorme, Arnaud and Scott Makeig (2004). ‘EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis’, Journal of Neuroscience Methods 134 (1): 9–21.Find this resource:

Demos, Raphael (1960). ‘Lying to oneself’, The Journal of Philosophy 57: 588–95.Find this resource:

Dennett, Daniel (2013). Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. London: Penguin Books.Find this resource:

DePaulo, Bella M. and Kathy L. Bell (1996). ‘Truth and Investment: Lies Are Told to Those Who Care’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 703–16.Find this resource:

DePaulo, Bella M. and Deborah A. Kashy (1998). ‘Everyday Lies in Close and Casual Relationships’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1): 63–79.Find this resource:

DePaulo, Bella M. and Susan E. Kirkendol (1989). ‘The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception’, in John C. Yuille (ed.), Credibility Assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 51–70.Find this resource:

DePaulo, Bella M. and Roger L. Pfeifer (1986). ‘On-the-Job Experience and Skill at Detecting Deception’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 16: 249–67.Find this resource:

DePaulo, Bella M., Miron Zuckerman, and Robert Rosenthal (1980). ‘Humans as lie detectors’, The Journal of Communication 30 (2): 129–39.Find this resource:

DePaulo, Bella M., Matthew E. Ansfield, Susan E. Kirkendol, and Joseph M. Boden (2004). ‘Serious Lies’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 26: 147–67.Find this resource:

DePaulo, Bella M., Deborah A. Kashy, Susan E. Kirkendol, Melissa M. Wyer, and Jennifer A. Epstein (1996). ‘Lying in everyday life’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (5): 979–95.Find this resource:

DePaulo, Bella M., James J. Lindsay, Brian E. Malone, Laura Muhlenbruck, Kelly Charlton, and Harris Cooper (2003). ‘Cues to deception,’ Psychological Bulletin 129 (1): 74–118.Find this resource:

DeRose, Keith (1991). ‘Epistemic possibilities’, The Philosophical Review 100 (4): 581–605.Find this resource:

DeRose, Keith (2002). ‘Assertion, Knowledge, and Context’, The Philosophical Review 111: 167–203.Find this resource:

DeRose, Keith (2009). The Case for Contextualism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

(p. 593) Descartes, René (1984). ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’, in John Cottingham (ed.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 12–65.Find this resource:

de Villiers, Jill G. and Peter A. de Villiers (2000). ‘Linguistic determinism and false belief’, in Peter Mitchell and Kevin J. Riggs (eds), Children’s Reasoning and the Mind. Hove: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

de Waal, Frans B. M. and Pier Francesco Ferrari (2010). ‘Towards a bottom-up perspective on animal and human cognition’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (5): 201–7.Find this resource:

Deweese-Boyd, Ian (2006). ‘Self-deception’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-deception//.

De Witt Huberts, Jessie C., Catharine Evers, and Denise T. D. De Ridder (2014). ‘ “Because I am worth it”: A theoretical framework and empirical review of a justification-based account of self-regulation failure’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 18: 119–38.Find this resource:

Dews, Shelly and Ellen Winner (1999). ‘Obligatory processing of the literal and nonliteral meanings of ironic utterances’, Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1579–99.Find this resource:

Dickhaut, John W., Kevin A. McCabe, and Arijit Mukherji (1995). ‘An experimental study of strategic information transmission’, Economic Theory 6: 389–403.Find this resource:

Dietrichson, Paul (1969). ‘Kant’s Criteria of Universalizability’, in Robert Paul Wolff (ed.), Kant: Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 163–207.Find this resource:

Dietz, Simone (2002). Der Wert der Lüge. Über das Verhältnis von Sprache und Moral. Paderborn: Mentis.Find this resource:

Dietz, Simone (2003). Die Kunst des Lügens. Eine sprachliche Fähigkeit und ihr moralischer Wert. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Find this resource:

Dilmon, Rakefet (2009). ‘Between Thinking and Speaking—Linguistic Tools for Detecting a Fabrication’, Journal of Pragmatics 41 (6): 1152–70.Find this resource:

Dirks, Paul H. G. M., Lee R. Berger, Eric M. Roberts, Jan D. Kramers, John Hawks, Patrick S. Randolph-Quinney, et al. (2015). ‘Geological and taphonomic context for the new hominin species Homo naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa’, eLife 4. Online. Available at https://elifesciences.org/articles/09561.

Doherty-Sneddon, Gwyneth, Vicki Bruce, Lesley Bonner, Sarah Longbotham, and Caroline Doyle (2002). ‘Development of gaze aversion as disengagement of visual information’, Developmental Psychology 38: 438–45.Find this resource:

Donagan, Alan (1977). The Theory of Morality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Dong, Guangheng, Yanbo Hu, Qilin Lu, and Haiyan Wu (2010). ‘The presentation order of cue and target matters in deception study’, Behavioral and Brain Functions 6: 1–9.Find this resource:

Doran, Ryan, Gregory Ward, Meredith Larson, Yaron McNabb, and Rachel E. Baker (2012). ‘A novel experimental paradigm for distinguishing between what is said and what is implicated’, Language 88 (1), 124–54.Find this resource:

Douglass, John G. (2007). ‘Can Prosecutors Bluff? Brady v. Maryland and Plea Bargaining’, Case Western Law Review 57: 581–92.Find this resource:

Dover, Kenneth J. (1974). Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Find this resource:

Dowe, Phil (2004). ‘Why Preventers and Omissions are Not Causes’, in Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 189–96.Find this resource:

Dreber, Anna and Magnus Johannesson (2008). ‘Gender differences in deception’, Economics Letters 99 (1): 197–99.Find this resource:

(p. 594) Du Bois, W. John (2014). ‘Towards a dialogic syntax’, Cognitive Linguistics, 25 (3): 359–410.Find this resource:

Dummett, Michael (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Dummett, Michael (1981). Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.Find this resource:

Duran, Nicholas D., Rick Dale, and Danielle S. McNamara (2010). ‘The action dynamics of overcoming the truth’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 17 (4): 486–91.Find this resource:

Duranti, Alessandro (1993). ‘Intentions, self, and responsibilities: an essay in Samoan Ethnopragmatics’, in Jane H. Hill and Judith T. Irvine (eds), Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 24–47.Find this resource:

Dyas, Julie Diane (2002). Linguistic Features of Lying under Oath: An Experimental Study of English and French. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2009). Humorous Garden-Paths: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2011a). ‘A Web of Deceit: A Neo-Gricean View on Types of Verbal Deception,’ International Review of Pragmatics 3 (2): 137–65.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2011b). ‘Joker in the Pack: Towards Determining the Status of Humorous Framing in Conversations’, in Marta Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217–41.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2011c). ‘‘You Talking to Me?’ The Viewer as a Ratified Listener to Film Discourse’, Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1628–44.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2012). ‘Garden-Paths, Red Lights and Crossroads: On Finding our Way to Understanding the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Jokes’, Israeli Journal of Humor Research: An International Journal 1: 6–28.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2013a). ‘Humorous Phenomena in Dramatic Discourse’, The European Journal of Humor Research 1: 22–60.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2013b). ‘Impoliteness as Disaffiliative Humour in Film Talk’, in Marta Dynel (ed.), Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105–44.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2013c). ‘When Does Irony Tickle the Hearer? Towards Capturing the Characteristics of Humorous Irony’, in Marta Dynel (ed.), Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 298–320.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2014). ‘Isn’t it Ironic? Defining the Scope of Humorous Irony’, HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 27: 619–39.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2015). ‘Intention to deceive, bald-faced lies, and deceptive implicature: Insights into Lying at the semantics-pragmatics interface’, Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (3): 309–32.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2016a). ‘Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness: On lying, deception, irony and metaphor’, Pragmatics & Cognition 23 (1): 174–208.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2016b). ‘Conceptualizing Conversational Humour as (Im)Politeness: The Case of Film Talk’, Journal of Politeness Research, 2/2: 117–47.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2018a). Irony, deception and humour. Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta (2018b). ‘No child’s play: A philosophical pragmatic view of overt pretence as a vehicle for conversational humour’, in Villy Tsakona and Jan Chovanec (eds), The Dynamics of Interactional Humour: Creating and Negotiating Humour in Everyday Encounters. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 205–28.Find this resource:

Dynel, Marta and Jörg Meibauer (2016). ‘Introduction: Everything you Always Wanted to Know about the Pragmatics of Deception but were Afraid to Test’, International Review of Pragmatics 8: 163–78.Find this resource:

(p. 595) Eckardt, Regine (2014). The Semantics of Free Indirect Speech. How Texts Let You Read Minds and Eavesdrop. Leiden: Brill.Find this resource:

Eelen, Gino (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Find this resource:

Egan, Andy and Brian Weatherson (eds) (2011). Epistemic Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Egan, Andy, John Hawthorne, and Brian Weatherson (2005). ‘Epistemic modals in context’, in Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter (eds), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning and Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–48.Find this resource:

Egré, Paul (2017). ‘Vague judgment: a probabilistic account’, Synthese 194 (10): 3837–65.Find this resource:

Egré, Paul and Florian Cova (2015). ‘Moral asymmetries and the semantics of many’, Semantics and Pragmatics 8 (13): 1–45.Find this resource:

Egré, Paul and Nathan Klinedinst (eds) (2011). Vagueness and Language Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

Eichelberger, Julie (2012). A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis of the Spanish Word Lie: Implications and Applications for the Second Language Learner. Master’s thesis. Baylor University.Find this resource:

Eisler, Frieda G. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York, NY: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Ekman, Paul (1997). ‘Deception, lying and demeanor’, in Diane F. Halpern and Alexander E. Voiskounsky (eds), States of Mind: American and Post-Soviet Perspectives on Contemporary Issues in Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 93–105.Find this resource:

Ekman, Paul (2009). Telling Lies. Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Find this resource:

Ekman, Paul and Maureen O’Sullivan (1991). ‘Who Can Catch a Liar?’, American Psychologist 46: 913–20.Find this resource:

Elaad, Eitan (1998). ‘The challenge of the concealed knowledge polygraph test’, Expert Evidence 6 (3): 161–87.Find this resource:

Ellsberg, Daniel (2003). Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers. London: Penguin.Find this resource:

Ellul, Jacques (1965). Propaganda: the Formation of Men’s Attitudes. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.Find this resource:

El Nakkouzi, Rania (2011). White Lies Telling in Lebanese Discourse. Master’s thesis. Lebanese American University.Find this resource:

Emerson, Peter Henry (1889). Naturalistic Photography for Students of the Art. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle and Rivington.Find this resource:

Ennis, Edel, Aldert Vrij, and Claire Chance (2008). ‘Individual Differences and Lying in Everyday Life’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 25: 105–18.Find this resource:

Erat, Sanjiv and Uri Gneezy, Uri (2012). ‘White lies’, Management Science 58 (4): 723–33.Find this resource:

Eriksson, John (2011). ‘Straight Talk: Conceptions of Sincerity in Speech’, Philosophical Studies 153 (2): 213–34.Find this resource:

Erman, Britt and Beatrice Warren (2000). ‘The idiom principle and the open choice principle’, Text 20 (1): 29–62.Find this resource:

Eslami, Zoreh R. (2005). ‘Invitations in Persian and English: ostensible or genuine?’, Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (4): 453–80.Find this resource:

Estrich, Susan (1986). ‘Rape’, Yale Law Journal 95: 1087–184.Find this resource:

Evans, Angela D. and Kang Lee (2011). ‘Verbal deceptions from late childhood to middle adolescence and its relation to executive functioning skills’, Developmental Psychology 47: 39–49.Find this resource:

(p. 596) Evans, Angela D. and Kang Lee (2013). ‘Emergence of lying in very young children’, Developmental Psychology 49: 1958–63.Find this resource:

Evans, Angela D., Fen Xu, and Kang Lee (2011). ‘When all signs point to you: Lies told in the face of evidence’, Developmental Psychology 47: 39–49Find this resource:

Fabiani, Monica, Demetrios Karis, and Emanuel Donchin (1986). ‘P300 and recall in an incidental memory paradigm’, Psychophysiology 23 (3): 298–308.Find this resource:

Fagin, Ronald, Joseph Halpern, Yoram Moses, and Moshe Vardi (1995). Reasoning About Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Oxford: Polity Press.Find this resource:

Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak (1997). ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, in Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258–84.Find this resource:

Falk, Dean, Charles Hildebolt, Kirk Smith, Michael J. Morwood, Thomas Sutikna, Peter Brown, et al. (2005). ‘The brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis’, Science 308 (5719): 242–5.Find this resource:

Falk, Dean, Charles Hildebolt, Kirk Smith, Michael J. Morwood, Thomas Sutikna, Jatmiko, et al. (2009). ‘LB1’s virtual endocast, microcephaly, and hominin brain evolution’, Journal of Human Evolution 57 (5): 597–607.Find this resource:

Falk, Patricia J. (1998). ‘Rape by Fraud and Rape by Coercion’, Brooklyn Law Review 64: 44–180.Find this resource:

Falkenberg, Gabriel (1980). ‘Lying and Truthfulness’, in Rudolf Haller and Wolfgang Grassl (eds), Language, Logic, and Philosophy. Proceedings of the fourth international Wittgenstein Symposium 1979, Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Temsky, 328–31.Find this resource:

Falkenberg, Gabriel (1982). Lügen. Grundzüge einer Theorie sprachlicher Täuschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Falkenberg, Gabriel (1988). ‘Insincerity and disloyalty’, Argumentation 2 (1): 89–97.Find this resource:

Falkenberg, Gabriel (1990). ‘Searle on sincerity’, in Armin Burkhardt (ed.), Speech Acts, Meaning and Intentions. Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of J. R. Searle. Berlin and New York, NY: De Gruyter, 129–46.Find this resource:

Fallis, Don (2009). ‘What is Lying?,’ The Journal of Philosophy 106 (1): 29–56.Find this resource:

Fallis, Don (2010a). ‘Lying and Deception’, Philosopher’s Imprint 10 (11): 1–22.Find this resource:

Fallis, Don (2010b). ‘What is Deceptive Lying?’, Paper presented at thePacific Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association. Online. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1702023.

Fallis, Don (2010c). Bayesians Don’t Tell Knowledge-Lies (and probably nobody else does either), ms. University of Arizona.Find this resource:

Fallis, Don (2011). ‘What liars can tell us about the knowledge norm of practical reasoning’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (4): 347–67.Find this resource:

Fallis, Don (2012). ‘Lying as a Violation of Grice’s First Maxim of Quality’, Dialectica 66 (4): 563–81.Find this resource:

Fallis, Don (2013a). ‘Privacy and Lack of Knowledge’, Episteme 10, Special Issue 2: 153–66.Find this resource:

Fallis, Don (2013b). ‘Davidson was Almost Right About Lying’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91: 337–53.Find this resource:

Fallis, Don (2015a). ‘Are Bald-Faced Lies Deceptive After All?’ Ratio 28: 81–96.Find this resource:

Fallis, Don (2015b). ‘Frankfurt wasn’t bullshitting!’, Southwest Philosophical Studies 37, 11–20.Find this resource:

Fara, Delia (2000). ‘Shifting Sands: an Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness’, Philosophical Topics 28 (1): 45–81. [Originally published under the name “Delia Graff”.]Find this resource:

Farah, Martha J., J. Benjamin Hutchinson, Elizabeth A. Phelps, and Anthony D. Wagner (2014). ‘Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges’, Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 15 (2): 123–31.Find this resource:

(p. 597) Farkas, Donka and Kim Bruce (2009). ‘On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions’, Journal of Semantics 27 (1): 81–118.Find this resource:

Farrell, Joseph (1993). ‘Meaning and Credibility in Cheap-Talk Games’, Games and Economic Behavior 5 (4): 514–31.Find this resource:

Farrell, Joseph and Matthew Rabin (1996). ‘Cheap Talk’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (3): 103–18.Find this resource:

Farrow, Tom F. D., Jenny Burgess, Iain D. Wilkinson, and Michael D. Hunter (2015). ‘Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management’, Neuropsychologia 67: 159–74.Find this resource:

Farrow, Tom F. D., Marie-Clare Hopwood, Randolph Parks, Michael D. Hunter, and Sean A. Spence (2010). ‘Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics’, The American Journal of Psychology 123 (4): 447–53.Find this resource:

Farwell, Lawrence A. and Emanuel Donchin (1991). ‘The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy (“lie detection”) with event-related brain potentials’, Psychophysiology 28 (5): 531–47.Find this resource:

Fauconnier, Gilles (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Faulkner, Paul (2007). ‘What is wrong with lying?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3): 535–57.Find this resource:

Faulkner, Paul (2013). ‘Lying and Deceit,’ in Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 3101–9.Find this resource:

Fawcett, Tom (2006). ‘An introduction to ROC analysis’, Pattern Recognition Letters 27: 861–74.Find this resource:

Fein, Ofer, Menahem Yeari, and Rachel Giora (2015). ‘On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of irony’, Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (1): 1–32.Find this resource:

Feldman, Richard and Earl Conee (2001). ‘Internalism Defended’, American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (1): 1–18.Find this resource:

Feldman, Robert S., James A. Forrest, and Benjamin R. Happ (2002). ‘Self-Presentation and Verbal Deception: Do Self-Presenters Lie More?’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 24: 163–70.Find this resource:

Ferenz, Volker (2008). Don’t Believe his Lies. The Unreliable Narrator in Contemporary American Cinema. Trier: WVT.Find this resource:

Ferguson, Heather J. and Richard Breheny (2011). ‘Eye movements reveal the time-course of anticipating behavior based on complex, conflicting desires’, Cognition 119 (2): 179–96.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Victor S. and Harold Pashler (2002). ‘Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (6): 1187.Find this resource:

Field, Hartry (1994). ‘Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content’, Mind 103 (411): 249–85.Find this resource:

Fielding, Nick and Ian Cobain (2011). ‘Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media’, The Guardian, 17 March.Find this resource:

Filik, Ruth and Linda M. Moxey (2010). ‘The on-line processing of written irony’, Cognition 116: 421–36.Find this resource:

Filik, Ruth, Hartmut Leuthold, Katie Wallington, and Jemma Page (2014). ‘Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40 (3): 811–28.Find this resource:

Fine, Kit (1975). ‘Vagueness, Truth, and Logic’, Synthese 30, 265–300.Find this resource:

Fingarette, Herbert (2000). Self-deception. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Finkenauer, Catrin, Peter Kerkhof, Francesca Righetti, and Susan Branje (2009). ‘Living Together Apart: Perceived Concealment as a Signal of Exclusion in Marital Relationships’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35: 1410–22.Find this resource:

(p. 598) Fintel, Kai von and Anthony Gillies (2008). ‘CIA leaks’, Philosophical Review 117(1): 77–98.Find this resource:

Fischbacher, Urs and Franziska Heusi (2008). ‘Lies in disguise: an experimental study on cheating’, Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (3): 525–47.Find this resource:

Fleck, Ludwik (1980): Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Find this resource:

Foley, Richard (2001). Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Foley, Richard (2005). ‘Universal Intellectual Trust’, Episteme 2 (1): 5–12.Find this resource:

Folstein, Jonathan R. and Cyma Van Petten (2008). ‘Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review’, Psychophysiology 45 (1): 152–70.Find this resource:

Forabosco, Giovannantonio (1992). ‘Cognitive Aspects of the Humour Process: The Concept of Incongruity’, Humor 5: 9–26.Find this resource:

Forabosco, Giovannantonio (2008). ‘Is the Concept of Incongruity Still a Useful Construct for the Advancement of Humor Research?’, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4: 45–62.Find this resource:

Foreign Policy (July 21, 2015) ‘There’s Still Hope for the Legacy of Tunisia’s Arab Spring’, by Paul Bonicelli. Available at https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com.

Fowler, Roger (1996). ‘On critical linguistics’, in Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard (eds), Texts and Practices. London: Routledge, 3–14.Find this resource:

Fox, Danny (2014). ‘Cancelling the Maxim of Quantity: Another challenge for a Gricean theory of scalar implicatures’, Semantics and Pragmatics 7 (5): 1–20.Find this resource:

Fox-Tree, Jean E. and Josef C. Schrock (1999). ‘Discourse markers in spontaneous speech: Oh what a difference an oh makes’, Journal of Memory and Language 40 (2): 280–95.Find this resource:

Frangipane, Nicholas (2016). ‘Lockwood the Liar: A Call to Reconsider “Wuthering Heights” as a Metafictional Work on the Limits of Narrative’, Brontë Studies: The Journal of the Brontë Society 41 (1): 29–38.Find this resource:

Franke Michael, Tikitu de Jager, and Robert van Rooij (2009). ‘Relevance in Cooperation and Conflict’, Journal of Logic and Computation 22 (1): 23–54.Find this resource:

Frankfurt, Harry G. (1986). ‘On Bullshit,’ Raritan 6 (1986): 81–100.Find this resource:

Frankfurt, Harry G. (1988). The Importance of What we Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Frankfurt, Harry G. (2002). ‘Reply to G.A. Cohen’, in Sarah Buss and Lee Overton (eds), Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 340–4.Find this resource:

Frankfurt, Harry G. (2005). On Bullshit. Princteon, NJ: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Frankish, Keith (2009). ‘Partial belief and flat-out belief’, in Franz Huber and Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds), Degrees of Belief. Berlin: Springer, 75–93.Find this resource:

Franklin, Benjamin (1789). ‘Letter to Jean-Baptiste Leroy’ (13/11/1789), in Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations, tenth edn (1919/2002), New York, NY: Bartleby.Find this resource:

Fraser, Bruce (1980). ‘Conversational mitigation’, Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341–50.Find this resource:

Fraser, Bruce (1994). ‘No Conversation without Misrepresentation’, in Herman Parret (ed.), Pretending to Communicate. New York, NY: De Gruyter, 143–53.Find this resource:

Frazee, Joey and David Beaver (2010). ‘Vagueness Is Rational under Uncertainty’, in Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager, and Katrin Schulz (eds), Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6042. Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York, NY: Springer, 153–62.Find this resource:

Frege, Gottlob (1892). ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100 (1): 25–50.Find this resource:

(p. 599) Frege, Gottlob (1997 [1918–19]). ‘Thought/Der Gedanke’, in Michael Beaney (ed.), The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 325–45.Find this resource:

Frege, Gottlob (1952). ‘On Sense and Reference’, in Peter Geach and Max Black (eds), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, 56–78.Find this resource:

Freud, Sigmund (1938). The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud (Modern Library Edition). New York, NY: Random House.Find this resource:

Fricker, Elizabeth (1994). ‘Against Gullibility’, in Bimal K. Matilal and Arindam Chakrabarti (eds), Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 125–61.Find this resource:

Fricker, Elizabeth (1995). ‘Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony’, Mind 104: 393–411.Find this resource:

Fricker, Elizabeth (2006). ‘Varieties of Anti-Reductionism About Testimony: A Reply to Goldberg and Henderson’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3): 618–28.Find this resource:

Fricker, Elizabeth (2012). ‘Stating and Insinuating’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 86: 61–94.Find this resource:

Fricker, Elizabeth (2014). ‘Epistemic Trust in Oneself and Others—An Argument from Analogy?’, in Laura Frances Goins and Timothy O’Connor (eds), Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 174–203.Find this resource:

Fricker, Elizabeth (2016a). ‘Doing what comes naturally: Zagzebski on rationality and epistemic self-trust’, Episteme 13 (2): 151–66.Find this resource:

Fricker, Elizabeth (2016b). ‘Unreliable Testimony’, in Brian McLaughlin and Hilary Kornblith (eds), Goldman and his Critics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 88–120.Find this resource:

Fried, Charles (1978). Right and Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Friedrich, Carl Joachim (1943). ‘Issues of Informational Strategy’, Public Opinion Quarterly 7 (1): 77–89.Find this resource:

Friend, Stacie (2007). ‘Fictional Characters’, Philosophy Compass 2 (2): 141–56.Find this resource:

Fu, Genyue, Angela D. Evans, Lingfeng Wang, and Kang Lee (2008). ‘Lying in the name of the collective good: A developmental study’, Developmental Science 11: 495–503.Find this resource:

Fu, Genyue, Kang Lee, Catherine Ann Cameron, and Fen Xu (2001). ‘Chinese and Canadian adults’ categorization and evaluation of lie- and truth-telling about prosocial and antisocial behaviours’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32 (6): 720–7.Find this resource:

Fu, Genyue, Fen Xu, Catherine A. Cameron, Gail Heyman, and Kang Lee (2007). ‘Cross-cultural differences in children’s choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies’, Developmental Psychology 43: 278–93.Find this resource:

Fullam, Rachael S., Shane McKie, and Mairead C. Dolan (2009). ‘Psychopathic traits and deception: functional magnetic resonance imaging study’, British Journal of Psychiatry 194 (3): 229–35.Find this resource:

Furedy, John J., Caroline Davis, and Maria Gurevich (1988). ‘Differentiation of deception as a psychological process: a psychophysiological approach’, Psychophysiology 25 (6): 683–8.Find this resource:

Furedy, John J., Francesca Gigliotti, and Gershon Ben-Shakhar (1994). ‘Electrodermal differentiation of deception: The effect of choice versus no choice of deceptive items’, International Journal of Psychophysiology 18 (1): 13–22.Find this resource:

Furedy, John J., Ruth T. Posner, and Alex Vincent (1991). ‘Electrodermal differentiation of deception: perceived accuracy and perceived memorial content manipulations’, International Journal of Psychophysiology 11 (1): 91–7.Find this resource:

Galanxhi, Holtjona and Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah (2007). ‘Deception in Cyberspace: A Comparison of Text-only vs. Avatar-supported Medium’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65: 770–83.Find this resource:

(p. 600) Galasiński, Dariusz (2000). The Language of Deception: A Discourse Analytical Study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Find this resource:

Galasiński, Dariusz (2004). ‘Restoring the order. Metalanguage in the press coverage of Princess Diana’s “Panorama” interview’, in Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasinski (eds), Metalanguage. Berlin: De Gruyter, 131–45.Find this resource:

Galasiński, Dariusz and Justyna Ziółkowska (2013). ‘Managing information. Misrepresentation in the patient’s notes’, Qualitative Inquiry 19: 589–99.Find this resource:

Gallant, Tricia Bertram (2008). ‘Revisiting the past: The historical context of academic integrity’, ASHE Higher Education Report 33: 13–31.Find this resource:

Gamer, Matthias (2011). ‘Detection of deception and concealed information using neuroimaging techniques’, in Bruno Verschuere, Gershon Ben-Shakhar, and Ewout H. Meijer (eds), Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press, 90–114.Find this resource:

Gamer, Matthias (2014). ‘Mind reading using neuroimaging. Is this the future of deception detection?’, European Psychologist 19 (3): 172–83.Find this resource:

Gamer, Matthias and Stefan Berti (2010). ‘Task relevance and recognition of concealed information have different influences on electrodermal activity and event-related brain potentials’, Psychophysiology 47 (2): 355–64.Find this resource:

Gamer, Matthias, Thomas Bauermann, Peter Stoeter, and Gerhard Vossel (2007). ‘Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information’, Human Brain Mapping 28: 1287–301.Find this resource:

Ganis, Giorgio (2015). ‘Deception detection using neuroimaging’, in Pär Anders Granhag, Aldert Vrij, and Bruno Verschuere (eds), Detecting Deception. New York, NY: John Wiley, 105–22.Find this resource:

Ganis, Giorgio and Pooja Patnaik (2009). ‘Detecting concealed knowledge using a novel attentional blink paradigm’, Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 34 (3): 189–96.Find this resource:

Ganis, Giorgio and Haline E. Schendan (2012). ‘Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6: 354.Find this resource:

Ganis, Giorgio, Robert R. Morris, and Stephen M. Kosslyn (2009). ‘Neural processes underlying self- and other-related lies: An individual difference approach using fMRI’, Social Neuroscience 4 (6): 539–53.Find this resource:

Ganis, Giorgio, J. Peter Rosenfeld, John Meixner, Rogier A. Kievit, and Haline E. Schendan (2011). ‘Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging’, NeuroImage 55 (1): 312–19.Find this resource:

Ganis, Giorgio, Stephen M. Kosslyn, S. Stose, William Lee Thompson, and Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd (2003). ‘Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation’, Cerebral Cortex 13 (8): 830–6.Find this resource:

Garber, Marjorie (1999). ‘ “ “ (Quotation Marks)’, Critical Inquiry 25: 653–64.Find this resource:

García-Carpintero, Manuel (2015). ‘Contexts as Shared Commitments’, Frontiers in Psychology 22 (6): 1932.Find this resource:

Gardiner, Patrick (1970). ‘Error, faith, and self-deception’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70: 221–43.Find this resource:

Gardner, Roy and Morris, Molly R. (1989). ‘The Evolution of Bluffing in Animal Contests: An ESS Approach, Journal of Theoretical Biology 137: 235–43.Find this resource:

Gaskett, Anne C. (2011). ‘Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives’, Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 86 (1): 33–75.Find this resource:

Gass, Robert H. and John S. Seiter (2014). Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining, 5th edn. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Find this resource:

(p. 601) Gass, Susan M. and Noel Houck (1999). Interlanguage Refusals. Berlin: De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Gehring, William J. and Robert T. Knight (2000). ‘Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring’, Nature Neuroscience 3 (5): 516–520.Find this resource:

Gehring, William J. and Adrian R. Willoughby (2002). ‘The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses’, Science 295 (5563): 2279–82.Find this resource:

Geis, Michael L. (1982). The Language of Television Advertising. New York, NY: Academic Press.Find this resource:

George, Joey F. and Alastair Robb (2008). ‘Deception and Computer-Mediated Communication in Daily Life’, Communication Reports 21: 92–103.Find this resource:

Gerhart, Barry and Meiyu Fang (2005). ‘National culture and human resource management: assumptions and evidence’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 16(6): 971–86.Find this resource:

Gerken, Mikkel (2013). ‘Internalism and Externalism in the Epistemology of Testimony’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (3): 532–57.Find this resource:

Gervais, Jean, Richard E. Tremblay, Lyse Desmarais-Gervais, and Frank Vitaro (2000). ‘Children’s persistent lying, gender differences, and disruptive behaviors: A longitudinal perspective’, International Journal of Behavioral Development 24 (2): 213–21.Find this resource:

Geuss, Raymond (2014). ‘A Note on Lying’, in Raymond Geuss, A World Without Why. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 135–43.Find this resource:

Geyer, Naomi (2010). ‘Teasing and Ambivalent Face in Japanese Multi-Party Discourse’, Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2120–30.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr (1980). ‘Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation’, Memory and Cognition 8: 449–56.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr (1981). ‘Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 431–44.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr (1986a). ‘Comprehension and memory for nonliteral utterances: The problem of sarcastic indirect requests’, Acta Psychologica 62: 41–57.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr (1986b). ‘On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115: 3–15.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr (1999). Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr (2002). ‘A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated’, Journal of Pragmatics 34: 457–86.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr and Herbert L. Colston (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gibson, Rhonda and Dolf Zillmann (1993). ‘The impact of quotation in news reports on issue Perception’, Journalism Quarterly 70: 793–800.Find this resource:

Gibson, Rajna, Carmen Tanner, and Alexander F. Wagner (2013). ‘Preferences for Truthfulness: Heterogeneity among and within Individuals’, American Economic Review 103 (1): 532–48.Find this resource:

Gil, Armande (2005). ‘Repressing distress in childhood: a defense against health-related stress’, Child Psychiatry and Human Development 36 (1): 27–52.Find this resource:

Gilbert, Daniel T. and Edward E. Jones (1986). ‘Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (2): 269–80.Find this resource:

Gilbert, Daniel T. and Patrick S. Malone (1995). ‘The correspondence bias’, Psychological Bulletin 117: 21–38.Find this resource:

(p. 602) Gilbert, Daniel T., Douglas S. Krull, and Patrick S. Malone (1990). ‘Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some Problems in the Rejection of False Information’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (4): 601–13.Find this resource:

Gilbert, Margaret (1989). On Social Facts. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Find this resource:

Giles, Howard and Tania Ogay (2007). ‘Communication accommodation theory’, in Bryan B. Whaley and Wendy Samter (eds), Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 293–310.Find this resource:

Gill, Christopher (1993). ‘Plato on Falsehood—not Fiction’, in Christopher Gill and T. P. Wiseman (eds), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 38–87.Find this resource:

Gillath, Omri, Amanda K. Sesko, Philip R. Shaver, and David S. Chun (2010). ‘Attachment, Authenticity, and Honesty: Dispositional and Experimentally Induced Security Can Reduce Self- and Other-Deception’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98: 841–55.Find this resource:

Gilovich, Thomas, Kenneth Savitsky, and Victoria H. Medvec (1998). ‘The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read our emotional states’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 332–46.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel (1994). ‘On the Political Message: Pretending to Communicate’, in Herman Parret (ed.), Pretending to Communicate. New York, NY: De Gruyter, 104–23.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel (1995). ‘On irony and negation’, Discourse Processes 19: 239–64.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel (1997). ‘Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis’, Cognitive Linguistics 7: 183–206.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel (1999). ‘On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language’ Journal of Pragmatics 31: 919–29.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel (2003). On our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel (2011). ‘Will anticipating irony facilitate it immediately?’, in Marta Dynel (ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 19–31.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel (2015). ‘Default nonliteral interpretations: The case of negation as a low-salience marker’, in Ewa Dąbrowska and Dagmar Divjak (eds), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 39), Berlin, Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton, 593–615.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel and Ofer Fein (1999b). ‘Irony: Context and salience’, Metaphor and Symbol 14: 241–57.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel and Inbal Gur (2003). ‘Irony in conversation: salience and context effects’, in Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman, and David Clarke (eds), Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meanings in Language and Mind. Berlin: De Gruyter, 297–316.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Ari Drucker, and Ofer Fein (2014). ‘Resonating with default nonsalient interpretations: A corpus-based study of negative sarcasm’, Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28: 3–18.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, and Tamir Schwartz (1998). ‘Irony: Graded salience and indirect negation’, Metaphor and Symbol 13: 83–101.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Shir Givoni, and Ofer Fein (2015). ‘Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm’, Metaphor and Symbol 30 (4): 290–313.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Ari Drucker, Ofer Fein, and Itamar Mendelson (2015). ‘Default sarcastic interpretations: On the priority of nonsalient interpretations’, Discourse Processes 52 (3): 173–200.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Moshe Raphaely, Ofer Fein, and Elad Livnat (2014). ‘Resonating with contextually inappropriate interpretations in production: The case of irony’, Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 443–55.Find this resource:

(p. 603) Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Ronie Kaufman, Dana Eisenberg, and Shani Erez (2009). ‘Does an “ironic situation” favor an ironic interpretation?’, in Geert Brône and Jeroen Vandaele (eds), Cognitive Poetics: Goal, Gain and Gaps. Berlin: De Gruyter, 383–99.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Nili Metuki, and Pnina Stern, P. (2010). ‘Negation as a metaphor-inducing operator’, in Laurence R. Horn (ed.), The Expression of Negation. Berlin and New York, NY: De Gruyter, 225–56.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Inbal Jaffe, Israela Becker, and Ofer Fein (2018). ‘Strongly attenuating highly positive concepts: The case of default sarcastic interpretations’, Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 6 (1): 19–47.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Eran Zaidel, Nachum Soroker, Gila Batori, and Asa Kasher (2000). ‘Differential Effect of Right and Left Hemispheric Damage on Understanding Sarcasm and Metaphor’, Metaphor and Symbol 15: 63–83.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Elad Livnat, Ofer Fein, Anat Barnea, Rakefet Zeiman, and Iddo Berger (2013). ‘Negation generates nonliteral interpretations by default’, Metaphor and Symbol 28: 89–115.Find this resource:

Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Dafna Laadan, Joe Wolfson, Michal Zeituny, Ran Kidron, et al. (2007). ‘Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects’, Metaphor and Symbol 22: 119–46.Find this resource:

Givoni, Shir, Rachel Giora, and Dafna Bergerbest (2013). ‘How speakers alert addressees to multiple meanings’, Journal of Pragmatics 48 (1): 29–40.Find this resource:

Glaser, Wilhelm R. and Franz-Josef Düngelhoff (1984). ‘The time course of picture-word interference’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 (5): 650–4.Find this resource:

Gneezy, Uri (2005). ‘Deception: The role of consequences’, American Economic Review 95 (1): 384–94.Find this resource:

Gneezy, Uri (ed.) (2013). ‘Special Issue: Deception, Incentives and Behavior’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 93: 196–413.Find this resource:

Gneezy, Uri, Bettina Rockenbach, and Marta Serra-Garcia (2013). ‘Measuring lying aversion’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 93: 293–300.Find this resource:

Gneezy, Uri, Silvia Saccardo, Marta Serra-Garcia, and Roel van Veldhuizen (2015). ‘Bribing the self’. Mimeo.Find this resource:

Goatly, Andrew (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Find this resource:

Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay in the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Sanford C. (2008). ‘Testimonial Knowledge in Early Childhood, Revisited’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1): 1–36.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Sanford C. (2011). ‘ “If That Were True I Would Have Heard about It by Now” ’, in Alvin Goldman and Dennis Whitcomb (eds), Social Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92–108.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Sanford C. (2015). Assertion. On the Philosophical Significance of Assertoric Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Goldman, Alvin I. (1979). ‘What Is Justified Belief?’, in George Sotiros Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Philosophical Studies Series, Vol 17. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–25.Find this resource:

Goldman-Eisler, Frieda (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Gombrich, Ernst H. (1968). Art and Illusion. London: Phaidon.Find this resource:

Gordon, Nathan J., William L. Felisher, and C. Donald Weinberg (2002). Effective Interviewing and Interrogation Techniques. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Gore, Al (1992). Earth in the Balance. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Find this resource:

(p. 604) Graham, Peter J. (2006). ‘Liberal Fundamentalism and Its Rivals’, in Jennifer Lackey and Ernest Sosa (eds), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 93–115.Find this resource:

Gramzow, Richard H. and Greg Willard (2006). ‘Exaggerating Current and Past Performance: Motivated Self-Enhancement Versus Reconstructive Memory’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32: 1114–25.Find this resource:

Granhag, Pär Anders, Franziska Clemens, and Leif A. Strömwall (2009). ‘The Usual and the Unusual Suspects: Level of Suspicion and Counter-Interrogation Tactics’, Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 6: 129–37.Find this resource:

Granhag, Pär Anders, Aldert Vrij, and Bruno Verschuere (eds) (2015). Detecting Deception. Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches. Chichester: Wiley.Find this resource:

Granhag, Pär Anders, Lars O. Andersson, Leif A. Strömwall, and Maria Hartwig (2004). ‘Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals’ beliefs about deception’, Legal and Criminological Psychology 9: 103–19.Find this resource:

Grant, Colin King (1958). ‘Pragmatic implication’, Philosophy 33 (127): 303–24.Find this resource:

Greely, Henry T., and Judy Illes (2007). ‘Neuroscience-based lie detection: The urgent need for regulation’, American Journal of Law and Medicine 33: 377–431.Find this resource:

Green, Stuart P. (2001). ‘Lying, Misleading, and Falsely Denying: How Moral Concepts Inform the Law of Perjury, Fraud, and False Statements’, Hastings Law Journal 53: 157–212.Find this resource:

Green, Stuart P. (2006). Lying, Cheating, and Stealing. A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Green, Stuart P. (2015). ‘Lies, Rape, and Statutory Rape’, in Austin Sarat (ed.), Law and Lies: Deception and Truth Telling in the American Legal System. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 194–253.Find this resource:

Greer, Kristen A. (2014). ‘Extensionality in natural language quantification: the case of many and few’, Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (4): 315–51.Find this resource:

Grice, H. Paul (1957). ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review 66: 377–88.Find this resource:

Grice, H. Paul (1975). ‘Logic and Conversation’, in Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York, NY: Academic Press, 41–58.Find this resource:

Grice, Paul (1989a). ‘Logic and Conversation’, in Paul Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 22–40.Find this resource:

Grice, Paul (1989b). ‘Further Notes on Logic and Conversation’, in Paul Grice, Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 41–57.Find this resource:

Grice, Paul (1989c). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Griffiths, Paul (2004). Lying: An Augustinian Theology of Duplicity. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.Find this resource:

Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof (1982). ‘Semantic analysis of wh-complements’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5(2): 175–233.Find this resource:

Gronau, Nurit, Gershon Ben-Shakhar, and Asher Cohen (2005). ‘Behavioral and physiological measures in the detection of concealed information’, Journal of Applied Psychology 90: 147–58.Find this resource:

Grotius, Hugo (1925 [1625]). On the Law of War and Peace (De jure belli ac pacis). Trans. Francis Kelsey. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Find this resource:

Gudykunst, William B. and Tsukasa Nishida (1983). ‘Social penetration in Japanese and American close friendships’, in Robert N. Bostrom (ed.), Communication Yearbook 7. New Brunswick, NJ: International Communication Association: 592–610.Find this resource:

Guidice, Rebecca M., G. Stoney Alder, and Steven E. Phelan (2009). ‘Competitive Bluffing: An Examination of a Common Practice and its Relationship with Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics 87: 535–53.Find this resource:

(p. 605) Guise, Kevin, Karen Kelly, Jennifer Romanowski, Kai Vogeley, Steven M. Platek, Elizabeth Murray, et al. (2007). ‘The Anatomical and Evolutionary Relationship between Self-awareness and Theory of Mind’, Human Nature 18 (2): 132–42.Find this resource:

Gupta, Swati, Kayo Sakamoto, and Andrew Ortony (2012). ‘Telling it like it isn’t: A comprehensive approach to analyzing verbal deception’, in Fabio Paglieri, Luca Tummolini, Rino Falcone, and Maria Miceli (eds), The Goals of Cognition: Essays in Honor of Cristiano Castelfranchi. London: College Publications, 579–610.Find this resource:

Gur, Ruben C. and Sackheim, Harold A. (1979). ‘Self-deception: A Concept in Search of a Phenomenon’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 147–69.Find this resource:

Hadar, Aviad A., Stergios Makris, and Kielan N. Yarrow (2012). ‘The truth-telling motor cortex: Response competition in M1 discloses deceptive behaviour’, Biological Psychology 89 (2): 495–502.Find this resource:

Haight, Mary Rowland (1980). A Study of Self-deception. Brighton: Harvester Press.Find this resource:

Hala, Suzanne and James Russell (2001). ‘Executive Control within Strategic Deception: A Window on Early Cognitive Development?’, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 80 (2): 112–41.Find this resource:

Hala, Suzanne, Michael Chandler, and Anna S. Fritz (1991). ‘Fledgling theories of mind: Deception as a marker of three-year-olds’ understanding of false belief’, Child Development 62 (1): 83–97.Find this resource:

Hall, Edward Twitchell (2000). ‘Context and meaning’, in Larry A. Samovar and Richard E. Porter (eds), Intercultural Communication, 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 34–43.Find this resource:

Hall, Granville Stanley (1891). ‘Children’s lies’, Pedagogical Seminary 1: 211–18.Find this resource:

Hall, Jeffrey A., Namkee Park, Hayeon Song, and Michael J. Cody (2010). ‘Strategic Misrepresentation in Online Dating: The Effects of Gender, Self-Monitoring, and Personality Traits’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 27: 117–35.Find this resource:

Hall, Stuart (1981). ‘Encoding/Decoding’, in Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis (eds), Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson, 128–38.Find this resource:

Hall, Stuart (1996). ‘The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees’, in David Morley and Kuan-Hsing Chen (eds), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge, 24–45.Find this resource:

Hall, Stuart (1997). ‘The Work of Representation’, in Stuart Hall (ed.), Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 13–74.Find this resource:

Hample, Dale (1980). ‘Purposes and effects of lying’, Southern Speech Communication Journal 46: 33–47.Find this resource:

Hancock, Jeffrey T. (2007). ‘Digital deception. Why, when and how people lie online’, in Adam Joinson, Katelyn McKenna, Tom Postmes, and Ulf-Dietrich Reips (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289–330.Find this resource:

Hancock, Jeffrey T. and Amy Gonzalez (2013). ‘Deception in computer-mediated communication’, in Susan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen (eds), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter, 363–85.Find this resource:

Hancock, Jeffrey T., Lauren E. Curry, Saurabh Goorha, and Michael Woodworth (2008). ‘On Lying and Being Lied To: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication’, Discourse Processes 45 (1): 1–23.Find this resource:

Hanna, Joy E., Michael K. Tanenhaus, and John C. Trueswell (2003). ‘The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation’, Journal of Memory and Language 49 (1): 43–61.Find this resource:

(p. 606) Hansson, Sten (2015). ‘Calculated overcommunication: Strategic uses of prolixity, irrelevance, and repetition in administrative language’, Journal of Pragmatics 84: 172–88.Find this resource:

Hardcastle, Gary L. and George A. Reisch (eds) (2006). Bullshit and Philosophy. Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Find this resource:

Hardin, Karol J. (2010). ‘The Spanish notion of Lie: Revisiting Coleman and Kay’, Journal of Pragmatics 42 (12): 3199–213.Find this resource:

Hare, Brian, Josep Call, and Michael Tomasello (2006). ‘Chimpanzees deceive a human competitor by hiding’, Cognition 101 (3): 495–514.Find this resource:

Harman, Gilbert H. (1973). Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Harnish, Robert M. (2005). ‘Commitment and speech act’, Philosophica 75: 11–41.Find this resource:

Harrington, Brooke (ed.) (2009). Deception. From Ancient Empires to Internet Dating. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

Harris, Joel Chandler (1902 [1880]). Uncle Remus. His Songs and His Sayings. New York, NY: Appleton (first American edn 1880).Find this resource:

Harris, Roy (2005). ‘Visual and verbal ambiguity, or why ceci was never a pipe’, Word & Image 21 (2): 182–7.Find this resource:

Harry, Joseph C. (2014). ‘Journalistic quotation: Reported speech in newspapers from a semiotic-linguistic perspective’, Journalism 15: 1041–58.Find this resource:

Hartshorne, Hugh and Mark A. May (1928). Studies in the Nature of Character: Vol. I. Studies in Deceit. New York, NY: Macmillan.Find this resource:

Hartwig, Maria and Charles F. Bond, Jr (2011). ‘Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments’, Psychological Bulletin 137 (4): 643–59.Find this resource:

Hartwig, Maria, Pär Anders Granhag, and Leif A. Strӧmwall (2007). ‘Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations’, Psychology, Crime & Law 13: 213–27.Find this resource:

Haselton, Martie G., David M. Buss, Viktor Oubaid, and Alois Angleitner (2005). ‘Sex, Lies, and Strategic Interference: The Psychology of Deception between the Sexes’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 3–23.Find this resource:

Hasson, Uri, Joseph P. Simmons, and Alexander Todorov (2005). ‘Believe It or Not’, Psychological Science 16 (7): 566–71.Find this resource:

Haugh, Michael (2010). ‘Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face’, Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2106–19.Find this resource:

Haverkate, Henk (1990). ‘A Speech Act Analysis of Irony’, Journal of Pragmatics 14: 77–109.Find this resource:

Hawthorne, John (2004). Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hawthorne, John (2012). ‘Some Comments on Fricker’s ‘Stating and Insinuating’’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 86: 95–108.Find this resource:

Haxby, James V., M. Ida Gobbini, Maura L. Furey, Alumit Ishai, Jennifer L. Schouten, and Pietro Pietrini (2001). ‘Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex’, Science 293 (5539): 2425–30.Find this resource:

Hee, Sun Park and Ji Young Ahn (2007). ‘Cultural Differences in Judgment of Truthful and Deceptive Messages’, Journal of Western Communication 71 (4): 294–315.Find this resource:

Heller, Daphna H., Daniel Grodner, and Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). ‘The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference’, Cognition 108 (3): 831–6.Find this resource:

Hempfer, Klaus W. (2004). ‘Some Problems Concerning a Theory of Fiction(ality)’, Style 38 (3): 302–23.Find this resource:

Herf, Jeffrey (2006). The Jewish Enemy. Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 607) Herman, Barbara (1993). The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Herman, Edward S. and Noam Chomsky (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Find this resource:

Herring, Eric and Piers Robinson (2014). ‘Deception and Britain’s Road to War in Iraq’, International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies, 8 (2, 3): 213–32.Find this resource:

Herring, Eric and Piers Robinson (2014–15). ‘Report X Marks the Spot: The British Government’s Deceptive Dossier on Iraq and WMD’, Political Science Quarterly 129 (4): 551–84.Find this resource:

Herring, Jonathan (2005). ‘Mistaken Sex’, Criminal Law Review, 511–524. Online. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract =1287130.

Hersh, Richard H. (1997, March-April). ‘Intentions and perceptions: A national survey of public attitudes toward liberal arts education’, Change 29: 16–23.Find this resource:

Hesk, Jon (2000). Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Heyman, Gail D. and Kang Lee (2012). ‘Moral development: Revisiting Kohlberg’s stages’, in Paul C. Quinn and Alan Slater (eds), Developmental Psychology: Revisiting the Classic Studies. London: Sage, 164–75.Find this resource:

Hickey, Neil (1999). ‘Handling corrections’, Columbia Journalism Review 38 (2): 42–3.Find this resource:

Higgins, E. Tory (1997). ‘Beyond Pleasure and Pain’, American Psychologist 52 (12): 1280–300.Find this resource:

Hilbig, Benjamin E., Morten Moshagen, and Ingo Zettler (2015). ‘Truth Will Out: Linking Personality, Morality, and Honesty through Indirect Questioning’, Social Psychology and Personality Science 62: 140–7.Find this resource:

Hill, Thomas E. Jr (1984). ‘Autonomy and Benevolent Lies’, in Journal of Value Inquiry 18: 251–67.Find this resource:

Hillman, Jackie (2014). ‘How much does it hurt? Detecting deceptive motion using point light displays’, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Association of Psychology and Law, St. Petersburg, 25 June 2014.Find this resource:

Hirata, Satoshi (2009). ‘Chimpanzee social intelligence: Selfishness, altruism, and the mother-infant bond’, Primates 50 (1): 3–11.Find this resource:

Hirata, Satoshi and Tetsuro Matsuzawa (2001). ‘Tactics to obtain a hidden food item in chimpanzee pairs (Pan troglodytes)’, Animal Cognition 4 (3–4): 285–95.Find this resource:

Hirstein, William (2005). Brain Fiction. Self-Deception and the Riddle of Confabulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Hitler, Adolf (1939 [1924]). Mein Kampf. Trans. James Murphy. London: Hurst and Blackett.Find this resource:

Hitler, Adolf (1943). Mein Kampf. Trans. Ralph Manheim. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Find this resource:

Hockett, Charles (1972). ‘Jokes’, in M. Estellie Smith (ed.), Studies in Linguistics in Honor of George L. Trager. New York, NY: Mouton, 153–78.Find this resource:

Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress (1993). Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Hoffer, Peter (2007). Past Imperfect: Facts, Fictions, Fraud—American History from Bancroft and Parkman to Ambrose, Bellesiles, Ellis, and Goodwin. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.Find this resource:

Hofstede, Gerard Hendrik (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Find this resource:

Hofstede, Gerard Hendrik (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Find this resource:

Holmes, Janet (1984). ‘Modifying illocutionary force’, Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345–65.Find this resource:

(p. 608) Holmstrom, Bengt (1979). ‘Moral Hazard and Observability’, Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 74–91.Find this resource:

Hooker, Brad (2000). Ideal Code, Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hopper, Robert and Robert Bell (1984). ‘Broadening the Deception Construct’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (3): 288–302.Find this resource:

Horák, Vitezslav (2007). ‘On Lying with Pictures’, in Jochen Mecke (ed.), Cultures of Lying. Theories and Practice of Lying in Society, Literature, and Film. Berlin: Galda + Wilch, 351–60.Find this resource:

Horn, Laurence R. (1984). ‘A new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature’, in Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT ‘84). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 11–42.Find this resource:

Horn, Laurence R. (1985). ‘Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity’, Language 61(1): 121–74.Find this resource:

Horn, Laurence R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Horn, Laurence (2017a). ‘What lies beyond: Untangling the web’, in Rachel Giora and Michael Haugh (eds), Doing Pragmatics Interculturally: Cognitive, Philosophical and Sociopragmatic Perspectives on Language Use. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, 151–74.Find this resource:

Horn, Laurence R. (2017b). ‘Telling it slant: Toward a taxonomy of deception’, in Dieter Stein and Janet Giltrow (eds), The Pragmatic Turn. Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse. Berlin, Boston, MA: De Gruyter, 23–55.Find this resource:

Hornung, Melanie (2016). ‘Classifying Prosocial Lies. An Empirical Approach’, International Review of Pragmatics 8: 219–46.Find this resource:

Horton, William S. and Boaz Keysar (1996). ‘When do speakers take into account common ground?’, Cognition 59: 91–117.Find this resource:

Horwich, Paul (1998). Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Howard-Snyder, Frances (2011). ‘Doing vs. Allowing Harm’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu./entries/doing-allowing/.

Hoye, Leo (1997). Adverbs and Modality in English. London and New York, NY: Longman.Find this resource:

Hu, Xiaoqing, Angela Evans, Haiyan Wu, Kang Lee, and Genyue Fu (2013). ‘An interfering dot-probe task facilitates the detection of mock crime memory in a reaction time (RT)-based concealed information test’, Acta Psychologica 142 (2): 278–85.Find this resource:

Huang, Yan (2010). ‘Neo-Gricean pragmatic theory’, in Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 607–31.Find this resource:

Huang, Yan (ed.) (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hume, David (1902 [1777]). Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Hunter, Jim, Yvonne Freer, Albert Gatt, Ehud Reiter, Somayajulu Sripada, and Cindy Sykes (2012). ‘Automatic generation of natural language nursing shift summaries in neonatal intensive care: BT-Nurse’, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 56: 157–72.Find this resource:

Hurka, Thomas (2015). British Ethical Theorists from Sidgwick to Ewing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hyde, Dominic (1997). ‘From heaps and gaps to heaps of gluts’, Mind 106 (424): 641–60.Find this resource:

Iacono, William G. (2011). ‘Encouraging the use of the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT): what the GKT has to offer law enforcement’, in Bruno Verschuere, Gershon Ben-Shakharm Ewout Meijer (eds), Memory Detection: Theory and Application oft he Concealed Information Test. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 12–23.Find this resource:

(p. 609) Ikuenobe, Polycarp (2002). ‘The meta-ethical issue of the nature of lying: Implications for moral education’, Studies in Philosophy and Education 21: 37–63.Find this resource:

Indefrey, Peter and Willem J. M. Levelt (2000). ‘The neural correlates of language production’, in Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences, second edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 845–65.Find this resource:

Innes, Robert and Arnab Mitra (2013). ‘Is Dishonesty Contagious?’, Economic Inquiry 51 (1): 722–34.Find this resource:

Intachakra, Songthama (2011). ‘Politeness Motivated by the ‘Heart’ and ‘Binary Rationality’ in Thai Culture’, Journal of Pragmatics 44 (5): 619–35.Find this resource:

Isenberg, Arnold (1964). ‘Deontology and the Ethics of Lying,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (4): 463–80.Find this resource:

Ivanko, Stacey L. and Penny M. Pexman (2003). ‘Context incongruity and irony processing’, Discourse Processes 35: 241–79.Find this resource:

Izadi, Ahmad (2015). ‘Persian honorifics and im/politeness as social practice’, Journal of Pragmatics 85: 81–91.Find this resource:

Jackson, Elizabeth. forthcoming. Belief and Credence: Why the Attitude-Type Matters. Philosophical Studies.Find this resource:

Jackson, Jane (2014). Introducing Lnguage and Intercultural Communication. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Jaeger, Stephan (2015). ‘Unreliable Narration in Historical Studies’, in Vera Nünning (ed.) Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness. Berlin: De Gruyter, 371–94.Find this resource:

James, William (1975a [1907]). Pragmatism. A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. The Work of William James, I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

James, William (1975b [1909]). The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to’Pragmatism’. The Works of William James, II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Jamieson, Kathleen Hall (1992). Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Jang, Su Ahn, Sandi W. Smith, and Timothy R. Levine (2002). ‘To Stay or To Leave? The Role of Attachment Styles in Communication Patterns and Potential Termination of Romantic Relationships Following Discovery of Deception’, Communication Monographs 69: 236–52.Find this resource:

Jankélévitch, Vladimir (1942). ‘Du Mensonge’, in Vladimir Jankélévitch (1998), Philosophie morale, Paris: Flammarion, 213–88.Find this resource:

Jary, Mark (2010a). Assertion. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Find this resource:

Jary, Mark (2010b). ‘Assertion and false-belief attribution’, Pragmatics & Cognition 18: 17–39.Find this resource:

Jay, Martin (2010). The Virtues of Mendacity: On Lying in Politics. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Find this resource:

Jentzsch, Ines and Werner Sommer, W. (2002). ‘Functional localization and mechanisms of sequential effects in serial reaction time tasks’, Perception and Psychophysics, 64 (7): 1169–88.Find this resource:

Jersáková, Jana, Steven D. Johnson, and Pavel Kindlmann (2006). ‘Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids’, Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81 (2): 219–35.Find this resource:

John, Carolyn and Guy Dodgson (1994). ‘Inductive reasoning in delusional thought’, Journal of Mental Health 3: 31–49.Find this resource:

Johnson, Eric (2005). ‘WAR in the media: Metaphors, ideology, and the formation of language policy’, Bilingual Research Journal 29: 621–40.Find this resource:

(p. 610) Johnson, Ray, Jr, Jack Barnhardt, and John Zhu (2003). ‘The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity’, Biological Psychology 64 (3): 217–53.Find this resource:

Johnson, Ray, Jr, Jack Barnhardt, and John Zhu (2004). ‘The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding’, Neuropsychologia 42 (7): 878–901.Find this resource:

Johnson, Ray, Jr, Heather Henkell, Elizabeth Simon, and John Zhu (2008). ‘The self in conflict: The role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes’, NeuroImage 39 (1): 469–82.Find this resource:

Johnson, Zachary V., Hasse Walum, Yaseen A. Jamal, Yao Xiao, Alaine C. Keebaugh, Kiyoshi Inoue, et al. (2015). ‘Central oxytocin receptors mediate mating-induced partner preferences and enhance correlated activation across forebrain nuclei in male prairie voles’, Hormones and Behavior 79: 8–17.Find this resource:

Johnston, Mark (1988). ‘Self-deception and the Nature of Mind’, in Brian P. McLaughlin and Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds), Perspectives on Self-deception. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 63–91.Find this resource:

Johnston, Mark (1992). ‘How to Speak of the Colors’, Philosophical Studies 68: 221–63.Find this resource:

Jonason, Peter K., Minna Lyons, Holly M. Baughman, and Philip A. Vernon (2014). ‘What a Tangled Web We Weave: The Dark Triad Traits and Deception’, Personality and Individual Differences 70: 117–19.Find this resource:

Jones, Edward E. and Victor A. Harris (1967). ‘The attribution of attitudes’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3: 1–24.Find this resource:

Jongman, Suzanne R., Ardi Roelofs, and Antje S. Meyer (2015). ‘Sustained attention in language production: An individual differences investigation’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4): 710–30.Find this resource:

Jordan, August E. (2003). ‘Implications of academic dishonesty for teaching in psychology’, Psychology of Teaching 30: 216–19.Find this resource:

Jowett, Garth S. and Victoria J. O’Donnell (2014). Propaganda and Persuasion, 6th edn. London: Sage.Find this resource:

Judges, A. V. (1969). ‘The evolution of examinations’, in Joseph A. Lauwerys and David G. Scanlon (eds), Examinations. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, 18–31.Find this resource:

Kaakinen, Johanna K., Henri Olkoniemi, Taina Kinnari, and Jukka Hyönä (2014). ‘Processing of written irony: An eye movement study’, Discourse Processes, 51 (4): 287–311.Find this resource:

Kahn, Itamar, Yehezkel, Yeskurun, Pia Rotshtein, Itzak Fried, Dafna Ben-Bashat, and Talma Hendler (2002). ‘The role of the amygdala in signaling prospective outcome of choice’, Neuron 33 (6): 983–4.Find this resource:

Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979). ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, Econometrica 47 (2): 263–91.Find this resource:

Kalbfleisch, Pamela J. (1994). ‘The Language of Detecting Deceit’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13: 469–96.Find this resource:

Kamp, Hans (1975). ‘Two theories about adjectives’, in Edward Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kant, Immanuel (1949 [1797]). ‘On a supposed right to lie from altruistic motives’, in his Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy. Edited and translated by Lewis White Beck. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Kant, Immanuel (1993a). ‘On a Supposed Right to Tell Lies Because of Philanthropic Concerns’, in Immanuel Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. James Ellington, 3rd edn. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Find this resource:

(p. 611) Kant, Immanuel (1993b). Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. James Ellington, 3rd edn. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Find this resource:

Kant, Immanuel (1996a). Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kant, Immanuel (1996b). On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy, in his Practical Philosophy, ed. Mary J. Gregor and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 605–16.Find this resource:

Kant, Immanuel (1996c): The Metaphysics of Morals, in his Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 353–603.Find this resource:

Kant, Immanuel (1997). Lectures on Ethics, ed. Peter Heath and Jerome B. Schneewind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Kaplar, Mary E. and Anne K. Gordon (2004). ‘The Enigma of Altruistic Lying: Perspective Differences in What Motivates and Justifies Lie Telling within Romantic Relationships’, Personal Relationships 11: 489–507.Find this resource:

Kartik, Navin (2009). ‘Strategic Communication with Lying Costs’, Review of Economic Studies 76 (4): 1359–95.Find this resource:

Kartik, Navin, Marco Ottaviani, and Francesco Squintani (2007). ‘Credulity, Lies, and Costly Talk’, Journal of Economic Theory 134: 93–116.Find this resource:

Karton, Inga and Talis Bachmann (2011). ‘Effect of prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on spontaneous truth-telling’, Behavioural Brain Research 225 (1): 209–14.Find this resource:

Kashy, Deborah A. and Bella M. DePaulo (1996). ‘Who Lies?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 1037–51.Find this resource:

Kassin, Saul M. (2005). ‘On the Psychology of Confessions: Does Innocence Put Innocents at Risk?’, American Psychologist 60: 215–328.Find this resource:

Kassin, Saul M. and Katherine L. Kiechel (1996). ‘The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and Confabulation’, Psychological Science 7: 125–8.Find this resource:

Katz, Albert N. and Todd R. Ferretti (2003). ‘Reading proverbs in context: The role of explicit markers’, Discourse Processes 36 (1): 19–46.Find this resource:

Katz, Albert N., Dawn G. Blasko, and Victoria A. Kazmerski (2004). ‘Saying what you don’t mean: Social influences on sarcastic language processing’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 13: 186–9.Find this resource:

Kecskés, Istvan (1999). ‘The use of situation-bound utterances from an interlanguage perspective’, in Jef Verschueren (ed.), Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 2. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association, 299–310.Find this resource:

Kecskés, Istvan (2000). ‘A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances’, Journal of Pragmatics 32: 605–25.Find this resource:

Keefe, Rosanna (2000). Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Keenan, Julian P. (2002). The Face in the Mirror. New York, NY: HarperCollins Ecco.Find this resource:

Keenan, Julian P., Jennifer Rubio, Connie Racioppi, Amanda Johnson, and Allyson Barnacz (2005). ‘The right hemisphere and the dark side of consciousness’, Cortex. A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 41 (5): 695–704; discussion 731–4.Find this resource:

Keiser, Jessica (2016). ‘Bald-faced lies: how to make a move in a language game without making a move in a conversation’, Philosophical Studies 173 (2): 461–77.Find this resource:

Keller, Daniel (2009). The Development of Shakespeare’s Rhetoric. A Study of Nine Plays. Tübingen: Narr.Find this resource:

Kelley, Thomas M. (2014). ‘Paltering’, in Timothy R. Levine (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Deception. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 745–7.Find this resource:

(p. 612) Kelly, Anita E. and S. E. Maxwell (2016). Bolstering psychology’s capacity to advance scientific knowledge. Unpublished ms.Find this resource:

Keltner, Dacher, Randall Young, Erin Heerey, Carmen Oemig, and Natalie Monarch (1998). ‘Teasing in Hierarchical and Intimate Relations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 1231–47.Find this resource:

Kemp, Kenneth W. and Thomas Sullivan (1993). ‘Speaking Falsely and Telling Lies,’ Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 67: 151–70.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Christopher (2007). ‘Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives’, Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (1): 1–45.Find this resource:

Kennedy, Christopher (2013). ‘Two sources of subjectivity: Qualitative assessment and dimensional uncertainty’, Inquiry 56 (2–3): 258–77.Find this resource:

Kenyon, Tim (2003). ‘Cynical assertion: Convention, Pragmatics, and Saying ‘Uncle’,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (3): 241–8.Find this resource:

Kenyon, Tim (2010). ‘Assertion and Capitulation’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91: 352–68.Find this resource:

Kerchner, Kathy (2001). SoundBites: A Business Guide to Working with the Media. Indianapolis, IN: Savage Press.Find this resource:

Kessler, Greg (2010). ‘Virtual Business: An Enron Email Corpus Study’, Journal of Pragmatics 42 (1): 262–70.Find this resource:

Khan, Imtiaz, Kees van Deemter, and Graeme Ritchie (2012). ‘Managing ambiguity in reference generation: the role of surface structure’, Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2): 211–31.Find this resource:

Kim, Min-Sun (2002). Non-western Perspectives on Human Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Find this resource:

Kim, Min-Sun, Karadeen Y. Kam, William F. Sharkey, and Theodore M. Singelis (2008). ‘Deception: Moral transgression or social necessity?: Cultural-relativity of deception motivations and perceptions of deceptive communication’, Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 1 (1): 23–50.Find this resource:

Kim, Uichol (1994). ‘Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration’, in Uichol Kim, Harry Charalambos Triandis, Çigdem Kâğitçibaşi, Sang-Chin Choi, and Gene Yoon (eds), Individualism and Collectivism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 19–40.Find this resource:

Kimball, Bruce A. (1986). Orators & Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Find this resource:

Kimball, Bruce A. (1997). ‘Naming pragmatic liberal education’, in Robert Orrill (ed.), Education and Democracy: Re-Imagining Liberal Learning in America. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board, 45–67.Find this resource:

Kimbrough, Scott (2006). ‘On letting it slide’, in Gary Hardcastle and George Reich (eds), Bullshit and Philosophy. Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time. Chicago, IL: Open Court, 3–18.Find this resource:

King, David (1997). Stalins Retuschen. Foto- und Kunstmanipulationen in der Sowjetunion. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.Find this resource:

Kinjo, Hitomi (1987). ‘Oral refusals of invitations and request in English and Japanese’, Journal of Asian Culture 11: 83–106.Find this resource:

Kipp, David (1980). ‘On Self-deception’, The Philosophical Quarterly 30: 305–17.Find this resource:

Kircher, John C., Steven W. Horowitz, and David C. Raskin (1988). ‘Meta-analysis of mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique’, Law and Human Behavior 12 (1): 79–90.Find this resource:

(p. 613) Kitamura, Tasaku and Michio Imafuku (2015). ‘Behavioural mimicry in flight path of Batesian intraspecific polymorphic butterfly Papilio polytes’, Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 282 (1809): 20150483.Find this resource:

Kittredge, Richard and John Lehrberger (1982). Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic Domains. Berlin: De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Klein, Ewan (1980). ‘A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (1), 1–45.Find this resource:

Klein, Peter (1998). ‘Certainty’, in Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 264–7.Find this resource:

Klockars, Carl B. (1984). ‘Blue lies and police placebos: The moralities of police lying’, American Behavioral Scientist 27: 529–44.Find this resource:

Knapp, Mark L. and Mark E. Comadena (1979). ‘Telling it like it isn’t: A review of theory and research on deceptive communication’, Human Communication Research 5: 270–85.Find this resource:

Knapp, Mark L., Roderick P. Hart, and Harry S. Dennis (1974). ‘An Exploration of Deception as a Communication Construct’, Human Communication Research 1 (1): 15–29.Find this resource:

Koehn, Daryl (1997). ‘Business and Game-Playing: The False Analogy’, Journal of Business Ethics 16: 1447–552.Find this resource:

Koenig, Melissa A. and Paul L. Harris (2007). ‘The Basis of Epistemic Trust: Reliable Testimony or Reliable Sources?’, Episteme 4 (3): 264–84.Find this resource:

Koenig, Melissa A., Fabrice Clément, and Paul L. Harris (2004). ‘Trust in Testimony: Children’s Use of True and False Statements’, Psychological Science 15 (10): 694–8.Find this resource:

Kohlberg, Lawrence (1971). ‘Stages of moral development as a basis of moral education’, in Clive M. Beck, Brian S. Crittenden, and Edmund V. Sullivan (eds), Moral Education: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 23–92.Find this resource:

Kölbel, Max (2004). ‘Faultless disagreement’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series 104: 53–73.Find this resource:

Kondo, Aya (2007). Nihonjin to gaikokujin no bijinesu komyunikeshon ni kansuru jisho kenkyu [The analysis of problems among Japanese and foreign business-people: Aiming at new “business communication in Japanese”]. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Find this resource:

Korsgaard, Christine M. (1986). ‘The Right to Lie: Kant on Dealing with Evil’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 15: 325–49.Find this resource:

Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996a). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996b). ‘Two arguments against lying’, in Christine M. Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–62.Find this resource:

Korn, David (2003). The Lies of George W. Bush. New York, NY: Crown Books.Find this resource:

Kotthoff, Helga (2003). ‘Responding to irony in different contexts: cognition and conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1387–411.Find this resource:

Koutlaki, Sofia A. (1997). The Persian system of politeness and the Persian folk concept of face, with some reference to EFL teaching to Iranian native speakers. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Wales.Find this resource:

Kovach, Bill and Tom Rosenstiel (2007). The Elements of Journalism. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.Find this resource:

Kovaz, David, Roger J. Kreuz, and Monica A. Riordan (2013). ‘Distinguishing sarcasm from literal language: Evidence from books and blogging’, Discourse Processes 50 (8): 598–615.Find this resource:

(p. 614) Kozel, F. Andrew, Kevin A. Johnson, Qiwen Mu, Emily L. Grenesko, Steven J. Laken, and Mark S. George (2005). ‘Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging’, Biological Psychiatry 58 (8): 605–13.Find this resource:

Kozel, F. Andrew, Steven J. Laken, Kevin A. Johnson, Bryant Boren, Kimberly S. Mapes, Paul S. Morgan, et al. (2009). ‘Replication of Functional MRI Detection of Deception’, Open Forensic Science Journal 2: 6–11.Find this resource:

Kozel, F. Andrew, Kevin A. Johnson, Emily L. Grenesko, Steven J. Laken, Samet Kose, Xinghua Lu, et al. (2009). ‘Functional MRI detection of deception after committing a mock sabotage crime’, Journal of Forensic Sciences 54 (1): 220–31.Find this resource:

Kozel, F. Andrew, Letty J. Revell, Jeffrey P. Lorberbaum, Ananda Shastri, Jon D. Elhai, Michael D. Horner, et al. (2004). ‘A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men’, Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 16: 295–305.Find this resource:

Kratzer, Angelika (1981). ‘The notional category of modality’, in Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer and Hannes Rieser (eds), Worlds, Words, and Contexts. Berlin: De Gruyter, 38–74.Find this resource:

Krauss, Robert M. (1981). ‘Impression formation, impression management, and nonverbal behaviors’, in E. Tory Higgins, C. Peter Herman, and Mark P. Zanna (eds), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 323–41.Find this resource:

Krauss, Sam (2017). Lying, risk and accuracy. Analysis. 77 (4).Find this resource:

Kress, Gunther and Theo van Leeuwen (1996). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Kreuz, Roger J. and Gina M. Caucci (2007). ‘Lexical influences on the perception of sarcasm’, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language. Rochester, NY: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1–4.Find this resource:

Krifka, Manfred (2007). ‘Approximate interpretation of number words’, in Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer, and Joost Zwarts, J. (eds), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschapen, 111–26.Find this resource:

Kripke, Saul (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Kripke, Saul (2011). ‘Vacuous names and fictional entities’, in Saul A. Kripke, Philosophical Troubles. Collected Papers, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52–74.Find this resource:

Krishna, Daya (1961). ‘ “Lying” and the Compleat Robot’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (46): 146–9.Find this resource:

Kritsky, Gene (2008). ‘Entomological reactions to Darwin’s theory in the nineteenth century’, Annual Review of Entomology 53: 345–60.Find this resource:

Kucich, John (1994). The Power of Lies. Transgression, Class and Gender in Victorian Fiction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Find this resource:

Kümmerling-Meibauer, Bettina and Jörg Meibauer (2011). ʻLügengeschichten und Geschichten vom Lügenʼ, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik (LiLi) 162: 118–38.Find this resource:

Kümmerling-Meibauer, Bettina and Jörg Meibauer (2015). ‘Beware of the Fox! Emotion and Deception in “Fox” by Margaret Wild and Ron Brooks’, in Janet Evans (ed.), Challenging and Controversial Picturebooks: Creative and Critical Responses to Visual Texts. London: Routledge, 144–59.Find this resource:

Künne, Wolfgang (2003). Conceptions of Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Kupfer, Joseph (1982). ‘The Moral Presumption against Lying’, Review of Metaphysics 36 (1): 103–26.Find this resource:

Kutlak, Roman (2014). Generation of referring expressions for an unknown audience. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen.Find this resource:

(p. 615) Kwan, Virginia S. Y., Veronica Barrios, Giorgio Ganis, Jamie Gorman, Claudia Lange, Monisha Kumar, et al. (2007). ‘Assessing the neural correlates of self-enhancement bias: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study’, Experimental Brain Research 182 (3): 379–85.Find this resource:

Labinaz, Paolo and Marina Sbisà (2014). ‘Certainty and Uncertainty in Assertive Speech Acts’, in Ilaria Riccioni, Carla Canestrari, Andrzej Zuczkowski, and Ramona Bongelli (eds), Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 31–58.Find this resource:

Labov, William (1972). ‘Rules for ritual insults’, in Thomas Kochman (ed.), Rappin’ and Stylin’ Out: Communication in Urban Black America. Champaign-Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 265–314.Find this resource:

Labov, William (1984). ‘Intensity’, in Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 43–70.Find this resource:

Lackey, Jennifer (1999). ‘Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission’, The Philosophical Quarterly 49 (197): 471–90.Find this resource:

Lackey, Jennifer (2005). ‘Testimony and the Infant/Child Objection’, Philosophical Studies 126 (2): 163–90.Find this resource:

Lackey, Jennifer (2007a). ‘Norms of Assertion’, Noûs 41: 594–626.Find this resource:

Lackey, Jennifer (2007b). ‘Why We Don’t Deserve Credit for Everything We Know’, Synthese 158 (3): 345–61.Find this resource:

Lackey, Jennifer (2008). Learning from Words. Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Lackey, Jennifer (2013). ‘Lies and Deception: An Unhappy Divorce’, Analysis 73 (2): 236–48.Find this resource:

Lackey, Jennifer (2015). ‘Group Lies’, forthcoming in Andreas Stocke and Eliot Michaelson (eds), Lying: Language, Knowledge, Ethics, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

LaFeber, Walter (1989). The American Age. New York, NY: Norton.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George (1973). ‘Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts’, Journal of philosophical logic 2 (4): 458–508.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Lakoff, Robin T. (1982). ‘Persuasive Discourse and Ordinary Conversation, with Examples from Advertising’, in Deborah Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 25–42.Find this resource:

Lakoff, Robin T. (1973). Language and Woman’s Place. Language in Society 2: 45–80.Find this resource:

Lamers, Martijn J. and Ardi Roelofs (2011). ‘Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (6): 1056–81.Find this resource:

Landweer, Hilge (2001). ‘Selbsttäuschung’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 49 (2): 209–27.Find this resource:

Lane, Liane W., Michelle Groisman, and Victor S. Ferreira (2006). ‘Don’t talk about pink elephants! Speakers’ control over leaking private information during language production’, Psychological Science 17 (4): 273–7.Find this resource:

Lane, Melissa (1999). ‘Plato, Popper, Strauss, and Utopianism: Open Secrets’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 16: 119–42.Find this resource:

Langevoort, Donald C. (1999). ‘Half-Truths: Protecting Mistaken Inferences by Investors and Others’, Stanford Law Review 52: 87–125.Find this resource:

Langleben, Daniel D., James W. Loughead, Warren B. Bilker, Kosha Ruparel, Anna R. Childress, Samantha I. Busch, and Ruben C. Gur (2005). ‘Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI’, Human Brain Mapping 26 (4): 262–72.Find this resource:

(p. 616) Langleben, Daniel D., Lee F. Schroeder, Joseph A. Maldjian, Ruben C. Gur, S. McDonald, John D. Ragland, et al. (2002). ‘Brain Activity during Simulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study’, NeuroImage 15: 727–32.Find this resource:

Langton, Rae (1992). ‘Duty and Desolation’, Philosophy 67: 481–505.Find this resource:

Lappin, Shalom (2000). ‘An intensional parametric semantics for vague quantifiers’, Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (6): 599–620.Find this resource:

Larbalestier, Justine (2009). Liar. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Find this resource:

Larson, Jane E. (1993). ‘Women Understand So Little, They Call My Good Nature “Deceit”: A Feminist Rethinking of Seduction’, Columbia Law Review 93: 374–472.Find this resource:

Lasersohn, Peter (1999). ‘Pragmatic halos’, Language 75: 522–51.Find this resource:

Lashmar, Paul and James Oliver (1998). Britain’s Secret Propaganda War: Foreign Office and the Cold War, 1948-77. Stroud: Sutton Publishing.Find this resource:

Lassiter, Daniel (2011). ‘Vagueness as Probabilistic Linguistic Knowledge’, in Rick Nouwen, Uli Sauerland, Hans-Christian Schmitz, Robert van Rooij (eds), Vagueness in Communication. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 127–50.Find this resource:

Lassiter, Daniel and Noah D. Goodman (2017). ‘Adjectival vagueness in a Bayesian model of interpretation’, Synthese 194 (10): 3801–36.Find this resource:

Lasswell, Harold (1927). Propaganda Technique in the World War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lavoie, Jennifer, Karissa Leduc, Angela M. Crossman, and Victoria Talwar (2016). ‘Do as I say and not as I think: Parent socialization of lie-telling behaviour’, Children & Society 30 (4): 253–64.Find this resource:

Leal, Sharon, Aldert Vrij, Ronald P. Fisher, and Hannie van Hooff (2008). ‘The time of the crime: cognitively induced tonic arousal suppression when lying in a free recall context’, Acta Psychologica 129 (1): 1–7.Find this resource:

Leal, Sharon, Aldert Vrij, Lara Warmelink, Zarah Vernham, and Ronald P. Fisher (2015). ‘You cannot hide your telephone lies: providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls’, Legal and Criminological Psychology 20: 129–46.Find this resource:

Lebow, Richard Ned (2008). ‘The Ancient Greeks and Modern Realism: Ethics, Persuasion, and Power’, Philosophy and Social Science 9 (1): 2–16.Find this resource:

Lee, James and Steven Pinker (2010). ‘Rationales for indirect speech: the theory of strategic speaker’, Psychological Review 117(3): 785–807.Find this resource:

Lee, Kang (2013). ‘Little Liars. Development of Verbal Deception in Children,’ Child Development Perspectives 7 (2): 91–6.Find this resource:

Lee, Kang and Hollie J. Ross (1997). ‘The Concept of Lying in Adolescents and Young Adults: Testing Sweetser’s Folkloristic Model’, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 43 (2): 255–70.Find this resource:

Lee, Kang, Catherine Ann Cameron, Fen Xu, Genyao Fu, and Julie Board (1997). ‘Chinese and Canadian children’s evaluation of lying and truth telling: Similarities and differences in the context of pro- and antisocial behaviours’, Child Development 68 (5): 924–34.Find this resource:

Lee, Peter M. (2012). Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction. New York, NY: John Wiley.Find this resource:

Leech, Geoffrey (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Leech, Geoffrey (1981). Semantics: The Study of Meaning, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Leech, Geoffrey (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Leekam, Susan (1991). ‘Jokes and Lies: Children’s Understanding of Intentional Falsehood’, in Andrew Whiten (ed.), Natural Theories of Mind. Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading. Oxford: Blackwell, 159–74.Find this resource:

(p. 617) Lehrer, Adrienne (1989). ‘Between quotation marks’, Journalism Quarterly 66: 902–6.Find this resource:

Leland, Patrick R. (2015). ‘Rational responsibility and the assertoric character of bald-faced lies’, Analysis 75 (4): 550–4.Find this resource:

Lenartowicz, Agatha, Donald J. Kalar, Eliza Congdon, and Russel A. Poldrack (2010). ‘Towards an ontology of cognitive control’, Top Cogn Sci 2 (4): 678–92.Find this resource:

Levashina, Julia and Michael A. Campion (2009). ‘Expected Practices in Background Checking: Review of the Human Resource Management Literature’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 21: 231–49.Find this resource:

Levelt, Willem J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Levin, Nili (February 9, 2014). “Intelligence”: Smart it is not. (In Hebrew). http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4485714,00.html.

Levine, Emma and Maurice M. Schweitzer (2014). ‘Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty’, in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 53: 107–17.Find this resource:

Levine, Emma and Maurice M. Schweitzer (2015). ‘Prosocial lies. When deception breeds trust’, in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 126: 88–106.Find this resource:

Levine, Timothy R. (ed.) (2014). Encyclopedia of Deception. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Find this resource:

Levine, Timothy R., Kim B. Serota, Hillary Shulman, David D. Clare, Hee Sun Park, Allison S. Shaw, et al. (2011). ‘Sender Demeanor: Individual Differences in Sender Believability Have a Powerful Impact on Deception Detection Judgments’, Human Communication Research 37: 377–403.Find this resource:

Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lewicki, Roy J. and Robert J. Robinson (1998). ‘Ethical and Unethical Bargaining Tactics: An Empirical Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 17: 665–82.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1970). ‘General semantics’, Synthese 22 (1): 18–67.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1978). ‘Truth in fiction’, American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1): 37–46.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1979). ‘Score-keeping in a language game’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1): 339–59.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (1982). ‘Logic for equivocators’, Noûs 16: 431–41.Find this resource:

Lewis, David (2000). ‘Causation as Influence’, The Journal of Philosophy 97: 182–97.Find this resource:

Lewis, Michael, Catherine Stanger, and Margaret Sullivan (1989). ‘Deception in 3-year olds’, Developmental Psychology 25 (3): 439–43.Find this resource:

Li, Annie S., Elizabeth A. Kelley, Angela D. Evans, and Kang Lee (2011). ‘Exploring the ability to deceive in children with autism spectrum disorders’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 41 (2): 185–95.Find this resource:

Libet, Benjamin (1995). ‘Necessary brain’, Nature 375 (6527): 100.Find this resource:

Libet, Benjamin (2006). ‘Reflections on the interaction of the mind and brain’, Progress in Neurobiology 78 (3–5): 322–6.Find this resource:

Libet, Benjamin, Elwood W. Wright, and Curtis A. Gleason (1983). ‘Preparation- or intention-to-act, in relation to pre-event potentials recorded at the vertex’, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 56 (4): 367–72.Find this resource:

Lincoln, Abraham (1989). Abraham Lincoln: Speeches and Writings. New York, NY: The Library of America.Find this resource:

Lindgren, Astrid (2007). Pippi Longstocking, trans. Tiina Nunnally. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original Swedish edn: Pippi Långstrump, 1945.)Find this resource:

(p. 618) Lindley, Foster T. (1971). ‘Lying and Falsity,’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 (1971): 152–7.Find this resource:

Lippman, Walter (1922). Public Opinion. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.Find this resource:

Lisofsky, Nina, Philipp Kazzer, Hauke R. Heekeren, and Kristin Prehn (2014). ‘Investigating socio-cognitive processes in deception: a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies’, Neuropsychologia 61: 113–22.Find this resource:

Locke, John (1996). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Kenneth P. Winkler. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Find this resource:

Loewenstein, George, Elke U. Weber, Christopher K. Hsee, and Ned Welch (2001). ‘Risks As Feelings’, Psychological Bulletin 127 (2): 267–86.Find this resource:

Loftus, Elizabeth F. and John C. Palmer (1974). ‘Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 585–9.Find this resource:

Logothetis, Nikos K. and Brian A. Wandell (2004). ‘Interpreting the BOLD signal’, Annual Review of Physiology 66: 735–69.Find this resource:

Lohmann, Heidemarie and Michael Tomasello (2003). ‘The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study’, Child Development 74: 1130–44.Find this resource:

Löhrer, Guido (2012). ‘Ist es manchmal richtig, unaufrichtig zu sein? Zur moralischen Valenz der Lüge’, Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 37 (1): 5–22.Find this resource:

Lopez, Jason K. and Matthew Fuxjager (2012). ‘Self-deception’s adaptive value: effects of positive thinking and the winner effect’, Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1): 315–24.Find this resource:

Louise, Patty (2013). ‘Mistakes happen, but how do we tell readers?’, Gateway Journalism Review 43: 14–20.Find this resource:

Loveman, Kate (2008). Reading Fictions, 1660-1740: Deception in English Literary and Political Culture. New York, NY: Routledge.Find this resource:

Loving, Bill and Brady Teufel (2012). ‘False impressions: How digital editing is altering public discourse’, International Journal of Law and Social Sciences 2(1): 167–72.Find this resource:

Löw-Beer, Martin (1990). Selbsttäuschung. Philosophische Analyse eines psychischen Phänomens. Freiburg, Munich: Verlag Karl Alber.Find this resource:

Lucian (1905) The True History. Transl. H. W. Fowler. Oxford: Clarendon Press (original Greek edn 2nd century).Find this resource:

Luck, Steven J. (2014). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lundquist, Tobias, Tore Ellingsen, Erik Gribbe, and Magnus Johannesson (2009). ‘The Aversion to Lying’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 70: 81–92.Find this resource:

Lutz, William (1987). Doublespeak: From “Revenue Enhancement” to “Terminal Living”: How Government, Business, Advertisers, and Others Use Language to Deceive You. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Find this resource:

Lykken, David T. (1959). ‘The GSR in the detection of guilt’, Journal of Applied Psychology 43 (6): 385–8.Find this resource:

Lykken, David T. (1998). A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Find this resource:

Lynch, Michael (2004). True to Life: Why Truth Matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Lyons, John (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

MacFarlane, John (2011). ‘What Is Assertion?’ in Jessica Brown and Herman Cappelen (eds), Assertion. New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 76–96.Find this resource:

Machiavelli, Niccolo (2003 [1532]). The Prince. Trans. George Bull. London: Penguin.Find this resource:

(p. 619) MacIntyre, Alasdair (1995). ‘Truthfulness, Lies, and Moral Philosophers: What Can We Learn from Mill and Kant?’, in Grethe B. Peterson (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 16. Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah Press, 308–61.Find this resource:

Mackey, Alison and Susan M. Gass (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

MacLaren, Vance V. (2001). ‘A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test’, Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (4): 674–83.Find this resource:

Mahamood, Saad and Ehud Reiter (2011). ‘Generating Affective Natural Language for Parents of Neonatal Infants’, Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation(ENLG), Nancy, France: 12–21.Find this resource:

Mahon, James Edwin (2006). ‘Kant and Maria von Herbert: Reticence vs. Deception’, Philosophy 81: 417–44.Find this resource:

Mahon, James Edwin (2007). ‘A Definition of Deceiving’, International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21: 181–94.Find this resource:

Mahon, James Edwin (2008a). ‘The definition of lying and deception’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lying-definition/.Find this resource:

Mahon, James Edwin (2008b). ‘Two Definitions of Lying’, International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2): 211–30.Find this resource:

Mahon, James Edwin (2008c). ‘An Analysis of Lying’. Unpublished ms.Find this resource:

Mahon, James Edwin (2009). ‘The Truth about Kant on Lies,’ in Clancy Martin (ed.), The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–24.Find this resource:

Mahon, James Edwin (2014a). ‘Deception, Characteristics of’, in Timothy R. Levine (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Deception. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 246–50.Find this resource:

Mahon, James Edwin (2014b). ‘Saint Augustine’, in Timothy R. Levine (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Deception. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 827–9.Find this resource:

Mahon, James Edwin (2015). ‘The definition of lying and deception’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lying-definition/.

Mahon, James Edwin (in press). ‘Secrets vs. Lies: Is There A Moral Asymmetry?’, in Andreas Stokke and Eliot Michaelson (eds.), Lying: Language, Knowledge, Ethics, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Find this resource:

Maier, Emar (2017). ‘Fictional names in psychologistic semantics’, Theoretical Linguistics 43 (1–2): 1–42.Find this resource:

Makinson, David C. (1965). ‘The Paradox of the Preface’, Analysis 25: 205–7.Find this resource:

Malcicka, Miriama, T. Martijn Bezemer, Bertanne Visser, Mark Bloemberg, Charles J. P. Snart, Ian C. Hardy, et al. (2015). ‘Multi-trait mimicry of ants by a parasitoid wasp’, Scientific Reports 5: 8043.Find this resource:

Mallan, Kerry (2013). Secrets, Lies, and Children’s Fiction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Find this resource:

Malone, Brian E. and Bella M. DePaulo (2001). ‘Measuring Sensitivity to Deception’, in Judith A. Hall and Frank Bernieri (eds), Interpersonal Sensitivity: Theory, Measurement, and Application. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 103–24.Find this resource:

Mameli, Francesca, Simona Mrakic-Sposta, Maurizio Vergari, Manuela Fumagalli, Margherita Macis, Roberta Ferrucci, et al. (2010). ‘Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex specifically processes general—but not personal—knowledge deception: Multiple brain networks for lying’, Behavioural Brain Research 211 (2): 164–8.Find this resource:

(p. 620) Mann, Michael E., Raymond S. Bradley, and Malcolm K. Hughes (1998). ‘Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries’, Nature 392: 779–87.Find this resource:

Mann, Samantha, Aldert Vrij, and Ray Bull. (2002). ‘Suspects, lies, and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars’, Law and Human Behavior 36: 365–76.Find this resource:

Mann, Samantha, Aldert Vrij, and Ray Bull (2004). ‘Detecting True Lies: Police Officers’ Ability to Detect Suspects’ Lies’, Journal of Applied Psychology 89: 137–49.Find this resource:

Mann, Samantha, Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal, Pär Anders Granhag, Lara Warmelink, L., and Dave Forrester (2012). ‘Windows to the soul? Deliberate eye contact as a cue to deceit’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 36: 205–15.Find this resource:

Mann, Samantha, Aldert Vrij, Erika Nasholm, Lara Warmelink, Sharon Leal, and Dave Forrester (2012). ‘The direction of deception: Neuro-Linguistic Programming as a lie detection tool’, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 27: 160–6.Find this resource:

Mann, Samantha, Aldert Vrij, Dominic J. Shaw, Sharon Leal, Sarah Ewens, Jackie Hillman, et al. (2013). ‘Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception’, Legal and Criminological Psychology 18: 324–40.Find this resource:

Mannison, Don (1969). ‘Lying and Lies’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 47: 132–44.Find this resource:

Marelich, William D., Jessica Lundquist, Kimberly Painter, and Mindy B. Mechanic (2008). ‘Sexual Deception as a Social-Exchange Process: Development of a Behavior-Based Sexual Deception Scale’, Journal of Sex Research 45: 27–35.Find this resource:

Marsili, Neri (2014). ‘Lying as a scalar phenomenon: insincerity along the certainty-uncertainty continuum’, in Sibilla Cantarini, Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss (eds), Certainty-Uncertainty and the Attitudinal Space in Between. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 154–73.Find this resource:

Marsili, Neri (2016). Lying by Promising. International Review of Pragmatics 8(2). Brill: 271–313.Find this resource:

Martin, Clancy (ed.) (2009). The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Martin, L. John (1982). ‘Disinformation: An Instrumentality in the Propaganda Arsenal’, Political Communication 2 (1): 47–64.Find this resource:

Martin, Mike W. (1986). Self-deception and Morality. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Find this resource:

Martin, Rod (2007). The Psychology of Humor. An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Find this resource:

Martineau, Harriet (1989 [1838]). How to Observe Morals and Manners (Sesquicentennial edition). New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Find this resource:

Martinich, Al (2010). ‘The Total Content of What a Speaker Means’, in Klaus Petrus (ed.), Meaning and Analysis. New Essays on Grice. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 252–67.Find this resource:

Mas, Alexandre and Enrico Moretti (2009). ‘Peers at work’, American Economic Review 99 (1): 112–45.Find this resource:

Mascaro, Olivier and Dan Sperber (2009). ‘The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception’, Cognition 112: 367–80.Find this resource:

Mason, John E. (1935). Gentlefolk in the Making: Studies in the History of English Courtesy Literature and Related Topics from 1531 to 1774. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Find this resource:

Mateo, José and Francisco Yus (2013). ‘Towards a Cross-cultural Pragmatic Taxonomy of Insults’, Journal of Language Aggression & Conflict 1 (1): 87–114.Find this resource:

Mathiesen, Kay (2006). ‘The Epistemic Features of Group Belief’, Episteme 2 (3): 161–75.Find this resource:

Matsuda, Izumi, Hiroshi Nittono, and John J. B. Allen (2012). ‘The current and future status of the concealed information test for field use’, Frontiers in Psychology 3: 532.Find this resource:

(p. 621) Matsuda, Izumi, Hiroshi Nittono, and John J. B. Allen (2013). ‘Detection of concealed information by P3 and frontal EEG asymmetry’, Neuroscience Letters 537: 55–9.Find this resource:

Maunsell, John H., Gary Sclar, Tara A. Nealey, and Derryl D. DePriest (1991). ‘Extraretinal representations in area V4 in the macaque monkey’, Visual Neuroscience 7 (6): 561–73.Find this resource:

Mayer, Milton (1966). They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Mazar, Nina, On Amir, and Dan Ariely (2008). ‘The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance’, Journal of Marketing Research 45: 633–44.Find this resource:

McCarthy, Michael J. and Ronald A. Carter (2004). ‘‘There’s millions of them’: hyperbole in everyday conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics 36: 149–84.Find this resource:

McCloskey, Michael E. and Sam Glucksberg (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6(4), 462–72.Find this resource:

McCollam, Douglas (2010). ‘A distant echo’. Columbia Journalism Review, 48 (5): 55–7.Find this resource:

McCornack, Steven A. (1992). ‘Information manipulation theory’, Communication Monographs 59 (1): 1–16.Find this resource:

McCornack, Steven A. (1997). ‘The generation of deceptive messages: laying the groundwork for a viable theory of interpersonal deception’, in John O. Greene (ed.), Advances in Communication Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 91–126Find this resource:

McCornack, Steven A., Timothy R. Levine, Kathleen A. Solowczuk, Helen I. Torres, and Dedra M. Campbell (1992). ‘When the Alteration of Information is Viewed as Deceptive: An Empirical Test of Information Manipulation Theory’, Communication Monographs 59: 17–29.Find this resource:

McCornack, Steven A., Kelly Morrison, Jihyun E. Paik, Amy M. Wisner, and Xun Zhu (2014). ‘Information manipulation theory 2: A propositional theory of deceptive discourse production’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33 (4): 348–77.Find this resource:

McDonald, William F. (1985). Plea Bargaining: Critical Issues and Common Practices. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Find this resource:

McDonald, William F., James A. Cramer, and Henry H. Rossman (1980). ‘Prosecutorial Bluffing and the Case Against Plea Bargaining’, in William F. McDonald and James A. Cramer (eds), Plea Bargaining. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, ch. 1, 1–23.Find this resource:

McDonough, Kevin (1995). ‘The importance of examples for moral education: An Aristotelian perspective’, Studies in Philosophy and Education 14: 77–103.Find this resource:

McFadden, Charles (1967). Medical Ethics, 6th edn. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.Find this resource:

McGinn, Colin (2008). Mindfucking. A Critique of Mental Manipulation. Stocksfield: Acumen.Find this resource:

McGlone, Matthew S. (2005). ‘Quoted out of context: Contextomy and its consequences’, Journal of Communication 55: 330–46.Find this resource:

McGlone, Matthew S. (2010). ‘Deception by selective quotation’, in Matthew S. McGlone and Mark L. Knapp (eds), The Interplay of Truth and Deception. New York, NY: Routledge, 54–65.Find this resource:

McGlone, Matthew S. and Mark L. Knapp (eds) (2010). The Interplay of Truth and Deception. New Agendas in Communication. New York, NY: Routledge.Find this resource:

McGrath, Sarah (2005). ‘Causation by Omission: A Dilemma’, Philosophical Studies 123: 125–48.Find this resource:

McKinnon, Rachel (2015). The Norms of Assertion. Truth, Lies, and Warrant. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

McLeod, Beverly A. and Randy L. Genereux (2008). ‘Predicting the Acceptability and Likelihood of Lying’, Personality and Individual Differences 45: 591–6.Find this resource:

McNally, Louise and Isidora Stojanovic (2017). ‘Aesthetic adjectives’, in James O. Young, (ed.), The Semantics of Aesthetic Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–37.Find this resource:

(p. 622) McNaughton, David (1996). ‘An Unconnected Heap of Duties?’, The Philosophical Quarterly (46): 433–47.Find this resource:

McRae, Ken, Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton, and Michael K. Tanenhaus (1998). ‘Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension’, Journal of Memory and Language 38 (3): 283–312.Find this resource:

McStay, Andrew (2018). Emotional AI: The Rise of Empathic Media. London: Sage.Find this resource:

McSweeney, Brendan (2002). ‘Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—a failure of analysis’, Human Relations 55 (1): 89–118.Find this resource:

Mead, Nicole L., Roy F. Baumeister, Francesca Gino, Maurice E. Schweitzer, and Dan Ariely (2009). ‘Too Tired to Tell the Truth: Self-control Resource Depletion and Dishonesty’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45: 594–7.Find this resource:

Mealy, Marisa, Stephan Walter, and I. Carolina Urrutia (2007). ‘The Acceptability of Lies: A Comparison of Ecuadorians and Euro-Americans’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations 31: 689–702.Find this resource:

Mearsheimer, John (2011). Why Leaders Lie. The Truth about Lying in International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Mehlberg, Henry (1958). The Reach of Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Find this resource:

Meibauer, Jörg (2005). ‘Lying and falsely implicating’, Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1373–99.Find this resource:

Meibauer, Jörg (2011). ‘On lying: intentionality, implicature and imprecision’. Intercultural Pragmatics 8: 277–92.Find this resource:

Meibauer, Jörg (2014a). Lying at the Semantic-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Meibauer, Jörg (2014b). ‘Bald faced-lies as acts of verbal aggression’, Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 20 (1): 127–50.Find this resource:

Meibauer, Jörg (2014c). ‘A Truth that’s Told with Bad Intent: Lying and Implicit Content’, Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28: 97–118.Find this resource:

Meibauer, Jörg (2016a). ‘Understanding bald-faced lies. An empirical approach’, International Review of Pragmatics 8 (2): 247–70.Find this resource:

Meibauer, Jörg (2016b). ‘Aspects of a Theory of Bullshit’, Pragmatics & Cognition 23 (1): 69–92.Find this resource:

Meibauer, Jörg (2017). ‘ “Western” Grice? Lying in a cross-cultural dimension’, in Istvan Kecskes and Stavros Assimakopoulos (eds), Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins, 33–52.Find this resource:

Meibauer, Jörg (2018): ‘The Linguistics of Lying’, Annual Review of Linguistics 4: 357–75.Find this resource:

Meijer, Ewout H. and Bruno Verschuere (2015). ‘The Polygraph: Current Practice and New Approaches’, in Pär Anders Granhag, Aldert Vrij, and Bruno Verschuere (eds), Detecting Deception. Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches. Chichester: Wiley, 59–80.Find this resource:

Meijer, Ewout H., Nathalie Klein-Selle, Lotem Elber, and Gershon Ben-Shakhar (2014). ‘Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: A meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data’, Psychophysiology 51 (9): 879–904.Find this resource:

Meijer, Ewout H., Bruno Verschuere, Aldert Vrij, Harald Merckelbach, Fren Smulders, Sharon Leal, et al. (2009). ‘A call for evidence-based security tools’, Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology 1: 1–4.Find this resource:

Mele, Alfred R. (1987). Irrationality. An Essay on Akrasia, Self-deception, and Self-control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Mele, Alfred R. (1998). ‘Two Paradoxes of Self-deception’, in Jean-Pierre Dupuy (ed.), Self-deception and Paradoxes of Rationality. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 37–58.Find this resource:

(p. 623) Mele, Alfred R. (2001). Self-deception Unmasked. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Melzer, Arthur (2014). Philosophy Between the Lines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Menz, Florian (1989). ‘Manipulation Strategies in Newspapers: A program for Critical Linguistics’, in Ruth Wodak (ed.), Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 227–50.Find this resource:

Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (2015). https://merriam-webster.com.

Mey, Jacob (1985). Whose Language? A Study in Linguistic Pragmatics. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Michaelian, Kourken (2013). ‘The Evolution of Testimony: Receiver Vigilance, Speaker Honesty, and the Reliability of Communication’, Episteme 10 (1): 37–59.Find this resource:

Mill, John Stuart (1987 [1861]). ‘Utilitarianism’, in John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, Utilitarianism and other Essays, ed. Alan Ryan. London: Penguin.Find this resource:

Mill, John Stuart (2001). Utilitarianism, 2nd edn. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Find this resource:

Miller, Corey, Rachel D. Strong, Mark Vinson, and Claudia Brugman (2014). Ritualized indirectness: Explaining the language practice taarof as a reflection of Persian speakers’ cultural values. Technical Report. Center for Advanced Study of Language. University of Maryland.Find this resource:

Miller, David (2001). ‘Media Power and Class Power: Overplaying Ideology’, in Leo Panitch and Colin Leys (eds), Socialist Register 2002. London: Merlin Press.Find this resource:

Miller, David and William Dinan (2008). A Century of Spin: How Public Relations Became the Cutting Edge of Corporate Power. London: Pluto.Find this resource:

Miller, Gerald R. and James B. Stiff (1993). Deceptive Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.Find this resource:

Miller, Scott A. (2012). Theory of Mind: Beyond the Preschool Years. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

Millikan, Ruth G. (1987). Language, Thought, and Other Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Moeschler, Jacques (2013). ‘Is a speaker-based pragmatics possible? Or how can a hearer infer a speaker’s commitment?’, Journal of Pragmatics 48: 84–97.Find this resource:

Moloney, Kevin (2006). Rethinking Public Relations: PR Propaganda and Democracy, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Moncur, Wendy, Judith Masthoff, and Ehud Reiter (2009). ‘Facilitating Benign Deceit in Mediated Communication’, CHI EA ‘09, Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston: 3383–8.Find this resource:

Moncur, Wendy, Judith Masthoff, Ehud Reiter, Yvonne Freer, and Hien Nguyen (2013). ‘Providing Adaptive Health Updates Across the Personal Social Network’, Human Computer Interaction 29 (3): 256–309.Find this resource:

Montaigne, Michel (1595) (E). Essais. Verdun: P. Villey et Saulnier.Find this resource:

Monteleone, George T., K. Luan Phan, Howard C. Nusbaum, Daniel Fitzgerald, John-Stockton Irick, Stephen E. Fienberg, et al. (2009). ‘Detection of deception using fMRI: better than chance, but well below perfection’, Social Neuroscience 4 (6): 528–38.Find this resource:

Moore, George Edward (1962). Commonplace Book: 1919–1953. London: George Allen & Unwin.Find this resource:

Moore, George Edward (1965). Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Moore, Joseph G. (2000). ‘Did Clinton lie?’, Analysis 60 (267): 250–4.Find this resource:

Moran, Richard (2005). ‘Problems with sincerity’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 325–45.Find this resource:

(p. 624) Morency, Patrick, Steve Oswald, and Louis de Saussure (2008). ‘Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: A cognitive pragmatic approach’, Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 197–220.Find this resource:

Morgan, Charity J., Julia B. LeSage, and Stephen M. Kosslyn (2009). ‘Types of deception revealed by individual differences in cognitive abilities’, Social Neuroscience 4 (6): 554–69.Find this resource:

Morgenstern, Joe (2009). ‘Reaching for the sky, “Up” fails to soar’, Wall Street Journal, May 14, p. E4.Find this resource:

Morreall, John (1983). Taking Laughter Seriously. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Find this resource:

Morreall, John (1987). ‘Introduction’, in John Morreall (ed.), The Philosophy of Laughter and Humour. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Find this resource:

Morreall, John (1989). ‘Enjoying Incongruity’, Humor 2: 1–18.Find this resource:

Morreall, John (2009). Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Find this resource:

Morris, Benny (1997). Israel’s Border Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Morris, Benny (1999). Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist Arab Conflict, 1881-1999. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Find this resource:

Morris, Benny (2008). 1948. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Find this resource:

Morris, John (1976). ‘Can Computers Ever Lie?’, Philosophy Forum 14: 389–401.Find this resource:

Morris, Wendy L., R. Weylin Sternglanz, Matthew E. Ansfield, D. Eric Anderson, Jillian L. H. Snyder, and Bella M. DePaulo (2016). ‘A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Emotional Deception Detection Within New Same-Sex Friendships’, Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 42 (2): 204–18.Find this resource:

Morwood, Michael J., Radien P. Soejono, Richard G. Roberts, Thomas Sutikna, Chris S. M. Turney, Kira Westaway, et al. (2004). ‘Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia’, Nature 431 (7012): 1087–91.Find this resource:

Mullaney, Steven (1980). ‘Lying like truth: riddle, representation and treason in Renaissance England’, English Literary History, 47 (1): 32–47.Find this resource:

Müller, Gregor (1962). Die Wahrhaftigkeitspflicht und die Problematik der Lüge. Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder.Find this resource:

Nahari, Galit, Aldert Vrij, and Ronald P. Fisher (2014). ‘The verifiability approach: Countermeasures facilitate its ability to discriminate between truths and lies’, Applied Cognitive Psychology 28: 122–8.Find this resource:

Naquin, Charles E., Terri R. Kurtzberg, and Liuba Y. Belkin (2010). ‘The Finer Points of Lying Online: E-Mail Versus Pen and Paper’, Journal of Applied Psychology 95: 387–94.Find this resource:

National Research Council (2003). The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Find this resource:

Neale, Stephen (1992). ‘Paul Grice and the philosophy of language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 509–59.Find this resource:

Neu, Jerome (2008). Sticks and Stones. The Philosophy of Insults. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Neustupny, Jiří Václav (1982). Gaikokujin to no komyunikeshon [Communication with foreigners]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Find this resource:

Newey, Glen (1997). ‘Political Lying: A Defense,’ Public Affairs Quarterly 11: 93–116.Find this resource:

Newman, Matthew L., James W. Pennebaker, Diane S. Berry, and Jane M. Richards (2003). ‘Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (5): 665–75.Find this resource:

(p. 625) Newton, Paul, Vasudevi Reddy, and Ray Bull (2000). ‘Children’s everyday deception and performance on false-belief tasks’, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 18 (2): 297–317.Find this resource:

Ng, Sik Hung and James J. Bradac (1993). Power in Language. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Find this resource:

Nichols, Shaun and Stephen Stich (2000). ‘A Cognitive Theory of Pretense’, Cognition 74: 115–47.Find this resource:

Nisbett, Richard E. (2003). The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently… and Why. New York, NY: The Free Press.Find this resource:

Nishida, Tsukasa (2006). ‘Taijin komyunikeshon kodo no tokucho’ [The characteristics of behaviour in interpersonal communication], Studies in International Relations 27 (2): 139–61.Find this resource:

Nishimura, Fumiko (1997). ‘Koi toshite no uso: Hanashite no doki toiu kanten kara no Kosatsu’ [Lying as an action: Analysis from the speaker’s perspective], Bulletin of the Department of Teaching Japanese as Second Language, Hiroshima University 7: 165–71.Find this resource:

Nishimura, Fumiko (2005). ‘Nani wo uso to kanjiruka [what do you think a lie]’, in Sachiko Ide and Masako Hiraga (eds), Ibunka to komyumikeshon [Different cultures and communication], Tokyo: Hituzi shobo, 238–54.Find this resource:

Nishimura, Fumiko (2011). Lying: Strategies to manage undesirable communicative situations in Japan and New Zealand. Doctoral thesis. University of Waikato.Find this resource:

Norman, Laurence (2014). ‘EU moves to temper Putin “two weeks to Kiev” row; EU official says comments were made public out of context’, The Wall Street Journal, September 4. Avaialable at https://www.wsj.com/articles/eu-moves-to-temper-pution-two-weeks-to-kiev-row-1409831828.

Norton, Anne (2005). Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Find this resource:

Norton, Helen (2013). ‘Lies and the Constitution,’ Supreme Court Review 2012: 161–201.Find this resource:

Nose, Izuru, Jun’ichiro Murai, and Masato Taira (2009). ‘Disclosing concealed information on the basis of cortical activations’, NeuroImage 44 (4): 1380–6.Find this resource:

Nünning, Vera (ed.) (2015). Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness. Berlin: De Gruyter.Find this resource:

Nussbaum, Martha (1988). ‘Love’s Knowledge’, in Brian P. McLaughlin and Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds), Perspectives on Self-deception. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 487–514.Find this resource:

Nyberg, David (1993). The Varnished Truth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Oborne, Peter (2005). The Rise of Political Lying. London: Simon and Schuster, Free Press.Find this resource:

Ochs Keenan, Elinor (1976). ‘The Universality of Conversational Implicature’, Language in Society 5 (1): 67–80.Find this resource:

Onishi, Kristine H. and Renée Baillargeon (2005). ‘Do 15-month-old infants understand false-beliefs?’, Science 308: 255–8.Find this resource:

Orwell, George (1949). 1984. London: Warburg.Find this resource:

Osugi, Akemi (2011). ‘Daily application of the concealed information test: Japan’, in Bruno Verschuere, Gershon Ben-Shakhar, and Ewout H. Meijer (eds), Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 253–75.Find this resource:

Osvath, Mathias, and Elin Karvonen (2012). ‘Spontaneous innovation for future deception in a male chimpanzee’, PloS One 7 (5): e36782.Find this resource:

Page, Carl (1991). ‘The Truth about Lies in Plato’s Republic’, Ancient Philosophy 11: 1–33.Find this resource:

Pagin, Peter (2015). ‘Assertion’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2015 edition. Online. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/assertion/.

Pagin, Peter (2016). ‘Problems with Norms of Assertion’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (1): 178–207.Find this resource:

(p. 626) Paolazzi, Caterina (2013). ‘ “Do you really think it?”: Testing hypotheses on nonliteral default interpretations’, University of Trento, Italy. Unpublished ms.Find this resource:

Papafragou, Anna (2006). ‘Epistemic modality and truth conditions’, Lingua 116 (10): 1688–702.Find this resource:

Parikh, Rohit (1994). ‘Vagueness and utility: The semantics of common nouns’, Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (6): 521–35.Find this resource:

Parisi, Domenico and Castelfranchi, Cristiano (1977). ‘The discourse as a hierarchy of goals’, Signs of Change 1 (2): 31–67.Find this resource:

Parisi, Domenico and Castelfranchi, Cristiano (1981). ‘A Goal Analysis of Some Pragmatic Aspects of Language’, in Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà and Jef Verschueren (eds), Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino July 8-14, 1979. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 551–67.Find this resource:

Parkhurst, John L. (1825). Elements of Moral Philosophy. Concord, NH: J. B. Moore & J. W. Shepard.Find this resource:

Partee, Barbara (1989). ‘Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts’, in Caroline Wiltshire, Randolph Graczyk, and Bradley Music (eds), Papers from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 342–65.Find this resource:

Partington, Alan (2011). ‘Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation’, Journal of Pragmatics 43 (6): 1786–800.Find this resource:

Paton, Herbert James (1954). ‘An Alleged Right to Lie: A Problem in Kantian Ethics’, Kant-Studien 45: 190–203.Find this resource:

Patrick, Christopher J. and William G. Iacono (1989). ‘Psychopathy, threat, and polygraph test accuracy’, Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (2): 347–55.Find this resource:

Pavlidis, Ioannis, Norman L. Eberhardt, and James A. Levine (2002). ‘Seeing through the face of deception’, Nature 415 (6867): 35.Find this resource:

Pears, David (1984). Motivated Irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Find this resource:

Pears, David (1986). ‘The goals and strategies of self-deception’, in Jon Elster (ed.), The multiple self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 59–77.Find this resource:

Pecorari, Diane (2008). Academic Writing and Plagiarism: A Linguistic Analysis. New York, NY: Continuum Books.Find this resource:

Peirce, Charles S. (1902). ‘Vague’, in James Mark Baldwin (ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. New York, NY, London: Macmillan.Find this resource:

Peirce, Charles S. (1958 [1931–5]): Collected Papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Penn, Derek C. and Daniel J. Povinelli (2007). ‘On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a “theory of mind” ’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 362 (1480): 731–44.Find this resource:

Penn, Derek C., Keith J. Holyoak, and Daniel J. Povinelli (2012). ‘So, are we the massively lucky species?’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4): 236–7.Find this resource:

Pennebaker, James W., Martha E. Francis, and Roger J. Booth (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC 2001 Manual. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Pennesi, Karen (2013). ‘Predictions as Lies in Ceará, Brazil: The Intersection of Two Cultural Models’, Anthropological Quarterly 86 (3): 759–89.Find this resource:

Pepp, Jessica (Forthcoming): ‘Assertion, Lying and Falsely Implicating’, in: Sanford C. Goldberg (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Assertion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Perillo, Jennifer Torkildson and Saul M. Kassin (2011). ‘Inside Interrogation: The Lie, the Bluff, and False Confessions’, Law and Human Behavior 35: 327–37.Find this resource:

Perkins, Serena A. and Elliot Turiel (2007). ‘To lie or not to lie: To whom and under what circumstances’, Child Development 78 (2): 609–21.Find this resource:

(p. 627) Perner, Josef and Heinz Wimmer (1985). ‘‘John thinks that Mary thinks that … ’: Attribution of second-order false beliefs by 5- to 10-year old children’, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39 (3): 437–71.Find this resource:

Perner, Josef, Sandra Stummer, Manuel Sprung, and Martin J. Doherty (2002). ‘Theory of mind finds its Piagetian perspective: why alternative naming comes with understanding belief’, Cognitive Development 17: 1451–72.Find this resource:

Peskin, Joan (1992). ‘Ruse and representations: On children’s ability to conceal information.’ Developmental Psychology 28: 84–9.Find this resource:

Petersen, Steven E., Peter T. Fox, Michael I. Posner, Mark A. Mintun, and Marcus E. Raichle (1988). ‘Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing’, Nature 331 (6157): 585–9.Find this resource:

Peterson, Candida C. (1995). ‘The role of perceived intention to deceive in children’s and adults’ concepts of lying’, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 13 (3): 237–60.Find this resource:

Peterson, Candida C., James L. Peterson, and Diane Seeto (1983). ‘Developmental changes in ideas about lying’, Child Development 54 (6): 1529–35.Find this resource:

Peth, Judith, Tobias Sommer, Martin N. Hebart, Gerhard Vossel, Christian Buchel, and Matthias Gamer (2015). ‘Memory detection using fMRI—Does the encoding context matter?’, NeuroImage 113: 164–74.Find this resource:

Petrie, H. (1987). ‘The psycholinguistics of speaking’, in John Lyons, Richard Coates, Margaret Deuchar, and Gerald Gazdar (eds), New Horizons in Linguistics 2. London, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 336–66.Find this resource:

Pexman, Penny M., Todd Ferretti, and Albert N. Katz (2000). ‘Discourse factors that influence on-line reading of metaphor and irony’, Discourse Processes 29: 201–22.Find this resource:

Pfennig, David W. and Sean P. Mullen (2010). ‘Mimics without models: causes and consequences of allopatry in Batesian mimicry complexes’, Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 277 (1694): 2577–85.Find this resource:

Piaget, Jean (1965 [1932]). The moral judgment of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.Find this resource:

Pickel, Kerri L. (2004). ‘When a Lie Becomes the Truth: The Effects of Self-generated Misinformation on Eyewitness Memory’, Memory 12: 14–26.Find this resource:

Picornell, Isabel (2013). Cues to deception in a textual narrative context. PhD thesis. Aston University. [http://eprints.aston.ac.uk/19316/1/Studentthesis-2013.pdf] Accessed 12.08.2015.

Pinkal, Manfred (1995). Logic and Lexicon: The Semantics of the indefinite. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven (1994). The Language Instinct. New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven (2011). ‘Indirect speech, politeness, deniability, and relationship negotiation: Comment on Marina Terkourafi’s “The puzzle of indirect speech” ’, Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2866–8.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven, Martin Nowak, and James Lee (2008). ‘The logic of indirect speech’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (3): 833–8.Find this resource:

Plantiga, Alvin (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Plato (360 bc) The Republic, trans. B. Jowett, The InternetClassics Archive.Find this resource:

Plato (1997). ‘Theaetetus’, in John M. Cooper (ed.) Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 137–234.Find this resource:

Plato (2002). Five Dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo, trans. G. M. A. Grube, rev. John Cooper. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Find this resource:

Plato (2006). The Republic, trans. R. E. Allen. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 628) Plessner, Helmuth (1999 [1924]). The Limits of Community: A Critique of Social Radicalism. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Find this resource:

Poggi, Isabella, Francesca D’Errico, and Laura Vincze (2011). ‘Discrediting moves in Political Debates’, in Francesco Ricci et al. (eds), Proceedings of Second International Workshop on User Models for Motivational Systems: The Affective and the Rational Routes to Persuasion (UMMS 2011) (Girona), LNCS. Heidelberg: Springer, 84–99.Find this resource:

Polak, Alan and Paul L. Harris (1999). ‘Deception by young children following noncompliance’, Developmental Psychology 35 (2): 561–8.Find this resource:

Poldrack, Russell A. (2011). ‘Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding’, Neuron 72 (5): 692–7.Find this resource:

Poole, Steven (2006). Unspeak: How Words Become Weapons, How Weapons Become a Message, and How that Message Becomes Reality. London: Little Brown.Find this resource:

Popper, Karl R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Find this resource:

Popper, Karl R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York, NY: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Popper, Karl R. (1971). The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. I: The Spell of Plato. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Porat, Ariel and Omri Yadlin (2014). ‘Valuable Lies’, Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Working Paper 706/Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper 491. University of Chicago. [http://ssrn.com/abstract=2506309]

Porat, Ariel and Omri Yadlin (2016). ‘A Welfarist Perspective on Lies’, Indiana Law Journal 91(3), Article 1.Find this resource:

Porter, Joseph A. (1991). ‘Complement Extern: Iago’s Speech Acts’, in Virginia M. Vaughan and Ken Cartwright (eds), Othello. New Perspectives. Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 74–88.Find this resource:

Porter, Stephen, Naomi L. Doucette, Michael Woodworth, Jeff Earle, and Bonnie MacNeil (2008). ‘Halfe the world knows not how the other halfe lies: Investigation of verbal and non-verbal signs of deception exhibited by criminal offenders and non-offenders’, Legal and Criminological Psychology 13: 27–38.Find this resource:

Portet, Francois, Ehud Reiter, Albert Gatt, Jim Hunter, Somayajulu Sripada, Yvonne Freer, et al. (2009). ‘Automatic Generation of Textual Summaries from Neonatal Intensive Care Data’, Artificial Intelligence 173: 789–816.Find this resource:

Povinelli, Daniel J. (1993). ‘Reconstructing the evolution of mind’, The American Psychologist 48 (5): 493–509.Find this resource:

Povinelli, Daniel J. and D. Richard Davis (1994). ‘Differences between chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens) in the resting state of the index finger: implications for pointing’, Journal of Comparative Psychology 108 (2): 134–9.Find this resource:

Powell, Scott, Kleber Del-Claro, Rodrigo M. Feitosa, and Carlos R. F. Brandão (2014). ‘Mimicry and eavesdropping enable a new form of social parasitism in ants’, The American Naturalist 184 (4): 500–9.Find this resource:

Premack, David and Guy Woodruff (1978). ‘Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4): 515–26.Find this resource:

Primoratz, Igor (1984). ‘Lying and “The Methods of Ethics” ’, International Studies in Philosophy 16 (1): 35–57.Find this resource:

Prince, Ellen F. (1981). ‘Topicalization, focus-movement, and Yiddish-movement: A pragmatic differentiation’, Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 7: 249–64.Find this resource:

(p. 629) Priori, Alberto, F. Mameli, Filippo Cogiamanian, Sara Marceglia, Marco Tiriticco, S. Mrakic-Sposta, et al. (2008). ‘Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception’, Cerebral Cortex 18 (2): 451–5.Find this resource:

Pritchard, Duncan (2005). Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Pritchard, Duncan (2008). ‘Sensitivity, Safety, and Anti-Luck Epistemology’, in John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 437–55.Find this resource:

Pruss, Alexander (2012). ‘Sincerely asserting what you do not believe,’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90: 541–6.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Max Garagnani, and Thomas Wennekers (2014). ‘Thinking in circuits: toward neurobiological explanation in cognitive neuroscience’, Biological Cybernetics 108 (5): 573–93.Find this resource:

Putnam, Hilary (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Quine, Willard V.O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Quintilianus, Marcus Fabius (95 AD/1953ff). The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian, ed./trans. H. E. Butler, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library).Find this resource:

Raatzsch, Richard (2009). The Apologetics of Evil: The Case of Iago. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Find this resource:

Rabab’ah, Ghaleb and Ali M. Al-Qarni (2012). ‘Euphemism in Saudi Arabic and British English’, Journal of Pragmatics 44: 730–43.Find this resource:

Radford, Colin (1975). ‘How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49: 67–93.Find this resource:

Raffman, Diana (2013). Unruly words: a study of vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Ramsey, Frank (1927). ‘Facts and Propositions’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 7: 153–70.Find this resource:

Ramsay, Maureen (2000a). ‘Justifications for Lying in Politics’, in Lionel Cliffe, Maureen Ramsay, and Dave Bartlett (eds), The Politics of Lying. London: Macmillan, 3–26.Find this resource:

Ramsay, Maureen (2000b). ‘Democratic Dirty Hands’, in Lionel Cliffe, Maureen Ramsay, and Dave Bartlett (eds). The Politics of Lying. London: Macmillan, 27–42.Find this resource:

Ransom, Keith, Wouter Voorspoels, Amy Perfors, and Daniel J. Navarro (2017). ‘A cognitive analysis of deception without lying’, in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 992–7.Find this resource:

Raskin, David C. and Charles R. Honts, C. (2002). ‘The comparison question test’, in Murray Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1–47.Find this resource:

Raskin, David C., Charles R. Honts, and John C. Kircher (2014). Credibility Assessment. Oxford: Academic Press.Find this resource: