Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 15 November 2019

Abstract and Keywords

Psycholinguistic studies bear on the grammar of ellipsis in many ways. They can shore up the empirical base of linguistics, through careful testing of multiple participants and items, and they permit testing of subtle judgments involving interactions. Processing evidence affords new types of arguments, e.g. based on syntactic indices being copied into an elided constituent despite semantic anomaly, and it highlights the fact that linguistic intuitions—judgments of acceptability—are not judgments of grammaticality, raising the possibility that the acceptability of certain ellipsis sentences may be best explained by (repair) operations of the parser, not by the grammar. Experimental results are brought to bear on the issues of the existence of syntactic structure in the ellipsis site, on the nature of the recoverability condition, and on licensing.

Keywords: ellipsis structure, syntactic matching, acceptable ungrammaticality, replacives, stripping, comparatives, gapping, verb phrase ellipsis, sluicing, fragment answers

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.