Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 06 December 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This article illustrates “rhetoric” as a multivalent term, encompassing deliberate deception, false fluency, redundancy, and inflated self-emphasis. It is a deeply unstable term, with one writer's meat invariably being another one's poison. Defined as cliché, commonplace, and unoriginal, though, rhetoric becomes a sort of inescapable ground against which literary innovation struggles constantly and “impossibly.” Ezra Pound had defined “rhetoric” as “the use of cliché unconsciously,” thereby perhaps leaving room for his own late invention of a consciously commonplace language of ethical injunction derived from Confucianism. Pound would not have seen the point of today's conceptual writing, though in one sense Goldsmith's work, with its blunt rejection of originality might be read as a programmatic and perhaps inevitable embrace of a rhetoric that was, for modernism, both a threat and a temptation.

Keywords: deception, false fluency, redundancy, self-emphasis, literary innovation, Ezra Pound, Goldsmith

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.