Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 03 June 2020

(p. 511) References

(p. 511) References

Aarts, Bas (2007). Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Abbot-Smith, Kirsten, Dittmar, Miriam, and Tomasello, Michael (2007). “Graded Representations in the Acquisition of English and German Transitive Constructions.” Cognitive Development 23: 48–66.Find this resource:

Abbot-Smith, Kirsten, and Tomasello, Michael (2006). “Exemplar-learning and Schematization in a Usage-based Account of Syntactic Acquisition.” The Linguistic Review 23: 275–90.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “The Influence of Frequency and Semantic Similarity on How Children Learn Grammar.” First Language 30: 79–101.Find this resource:

Achard, Michel (2008). “Cognitive Pedagogical Grammar,” in Peter Robinson and Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 432–55.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Farrell, Blevins, James P., and Malouf, Robert (2009). “Parts and Wholes: Implicative Patterns in Inflectional Paradigms,” in James P. Blevins and Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 54–82.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Farrell, and Goldberg, Adele E. (1996). “Constraints on Adjectival Past Participles,” in Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 17–30.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Farrell, and Nikolaeva, Irina (2004). Comparative Grammar and Grammatical Theory: A Construction-Based Study of Morphosyntax. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Find this resource:

Ackerman, Farrell, and Stump, Gregory S. (2004). “Paradigms and Periphrastic Expression: A Study in Realization-based Lexicalism,” in Louisa Sadler and Andrew Spencer (eds.), Projecting Morphology. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 111–57.Find this resource:

Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos (2009). “Aspects of the Grammar of Close Apposition and the Structure of the Noun Phrase.” English Language and Linguistics 13: 453–81.Find this resource:

Adger, David (2006). “Combinatorial Variability.” Journal of Linguistics 42: 503–30.Find this resource:

Adger, David, and Trousdale, Graeme (2007). “Variation in English Syntax: Theoretical Implications.” English Language and Linguistics 11: 261–78.Find this resource:

Ahrens, Kathleen (1995). “The Mental Representation of Verbs.” UCSD dissertation.Find this resource:

Akthar, Nameera (1999). “Acquiring Basic Word Order: Evidence for Data-driven Learning of Syntactic Structure.” Journal of Child Language 26: 339–56.Find this resource:

Akthar, Nameera, and Tomasello, Michael (1997). “Young Children's Productivity with Word Order and Verb Morphology.” Developmental Psychology 33: 952–65.Find this resource:

Alario, Xavier, and Caramazza, Alfonso A. (2002). “The Production of Determiners: Evidence from French.” Cognition 82: 179–223.Find this resource:

Alishahi, Afra, and Stevenson, Suzanne (2008). “A Computational Model of Early Argument Structure Acquisition.” Cognitive Science 32: 789–834.Find this resource:

(p. 512) Allen, Cynthia. (2001). “The Development of a New Passive in English,” in Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Time over Matter: Diachronic Perspectives on Morphosyntax. Standford: CSLI Publications, 43–72.Find this resource:

Allen, Kachina, Pereira, Francisco, Botvinick, Matthew, and Goldberg, Adele E. (2012). “Distinguishing Grammatical Constructions with fMRI Pattern Analysis”. Brain and Language 123: 174–82.Find this resource:

Alsina, Alex, and Mchombo, Sam. A. (1990). “The Syntax of Applicatives in Chichewa: Problems for a Theta Theoretic Asymmetry.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 493–506.Find this resource:

Altmann, Gerry T. M., and Steedman, Mark J. (1988). “Interaction with Context during Human Sentence Processing.” Cognition 30/3: 191–238.Find this resource:

Ambridge, Ben, and Goldberg, Adele E. (2008). “The Island Status of Clausal Complements: Evidence in Favor of an Information Structure Explanation.” Cognitive Linguistics 19: 357–89.Find this resource:

Ambridge, Ben, and Lieven, Elena V. M. (2011). Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Ambridge, Ben, Theakston, Anna, Lieven, Elena V. M., and Tomasello, Michael (2006). “The Distributed Learning Effect for Children's Acquisition of an Abstract Grammatical Construction.” Cognitive Development 21: 174–93.Find this resource:

Andersen, Henning (1987). “From Auxiliary to Desinence,” in Martin Harris and Paolo Ramat (eds.), Historical Development of Auxiliaries. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–50.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (2001). Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Anderson, John R. (1989). “A Rational Analysis of Human Memory,” in Henry L. I. Roediger and Fergus I. M. Craik (eds.), Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel Tulving. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 195–210.Find this resource:

Anderson, John R., and Schooler, Lael J. (2000). “The Adaptive Nature of Memory,” in Endel Tulving and Fergus I. M. Craik (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 557–70.Find this resource:

Anderson, Lloyd B. (1982). “The ‘Perfect’ as a Universal and as a Language-particular Category,” in Paul Hopper (ed.), Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 227–64.Find this resource:

———. (1986). “Evidentials, Paths of Change and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries,” in Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Encoding of Epistemology. Norwood: Ablex, 273–312.Find this resource:

ARCHER (A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers). no website.Find this resource:

Arcodia, Giorgio F. (2011). “A Construction Morphology Account of Derivation in Mandarin Chinese.” Morphology 21: 89–130.Find this resource:

Aronoff, Mark (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (1983). “Potential Words, Actual Words, Productivity and Frequency.” Paper Presented to the Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguists, Oslo.Find this resource:

———. (1994). Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Asaka, T. (2002). “A Lexical Licensing Analysis of the Adjectival Noun Construction.” English Linguistics 19: 113–41.Find this resource:

(p. 513) Auer, Peter (ed.) (2009). Style and Social Identities: Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

———. (2011). “Online Syntax and Construction Grammar: A Perfect Match? Some Reflections on Elliptical Expansions.” Paper Presented at the Workshop on Grammar and Interaction Revisited, Helsinki, March 10–12, 2011.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald (1993). “On Frequency, Transparency and Productivity,” in Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 181–208.Find this resource:

———. (2003). “Probabilistic Approaches to Morphology,” in Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay, and Stefanie Jannedy (eds.), Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press, 229–87.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald, Burani, Christina, and Schreuder, Rob (1997). “Effects of Semantic Markedness in the Processing of Regular Nominal Singulars and Plurals in Italian,” in Geert Booij and Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1996. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 13–34.Find this resource:

Baayen, R. Harald, Levelt, Willem, and Haveman, Alette (1993). Research Reported in Annual Report of the Max-Planck Institut für Psycholinguistik, 6. Nijmegen: Max-Planck Institut.Find this resource:

Bailey, David (1997). “A Computational Model of Embodiment in the Acquisition of Action Verbs.” Doctoral dissertation, Computer Science Division, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Bailey, David, Feldman, Jerome, Narayanan, Srini, and Lakoff, George (1997). “Modelling Embodied Lexical Development,” in Michael G. Shafto and Pat Langley (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Cognitive Science Conference. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 84–89.Find this resource:

Baker, Collin F., Fillmore, Charles J., and Cronin, Beau (2003). “The Structure of the Framenet Database.” International Journal of Lexicography 16: 281–96.Find this resource:

Baker, Mark (1997). “Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure,” in Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Kluwer: Dordrecht, 73–137.Find this resource:

———. (2004). Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives: Their Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Ball, Catherine N. (1996). “A Diachronic Study of Relative Markers in Spoken and Written English.” Language Variation and Change 8: 227–58.Find this resource:

Bannard, Colin (2005). “Learning About the Meaning of Verb Particle Constructions from Corpora.” Journal of Computer Speech and Language 19/4: 467–78.Find this resource:

Bannard, Colin, Baldwin, Timothy, and Lascarides, Alex (2003). “A Statistical Approach to the Semantics of Verb-Particles.” Proceedings of the ACL-Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Analysis, Acquisition and Treatment, 65–72.Find this resource:

Bannard, Colin, and Matthews, Danielle (2008). “Stored Word Sequences in Language Learning: The Effect of Familiarity on Children's Repetition of Four-Word Combinations.” Psychological Science 19: 241–48.Find this resource:

Bao, Zhiming, and Wee, Lionel (1999). “The Passive in Singapore English.” World Englishes 18: 1–13.Find this resource:

Barðdal, Jóhanna (1999). “Case and Argument Structure of Some Loan Verbs in 15th Century Icelandic,” in Inger Haskå and Carin Sandqvist (eds.), Alla tiders språk: En Vänskrift till Gertrud Pettersson November 1999. Lundastudier i Nordisk språkvetenskap A 55. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, 9–23.Find this resource:

———. (2001). “The Perplexity of Dat-Nom Verbs in Icelandic.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.Find this resource:

(p. 514) ———. (2006). “Construction-specific Properties of Syntactic Subjects in Icelandic and German.” Cognitive Linguistics 17: 39–106.Find this resource:

———. (2008). Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “The Development of Case in Germanic,” in Jóhanna Barðdal and Shobhana Chelliah (eds.), The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123–59.Find this resource:

———. (2011a). “Lexical vs. Structural Case: A False Dichotomy.” Morphology 21/1: 619–54.Find this resource:

———. (2011b). “The Rise of Dative Substitution in the History of Icelandic: A Diachronic Construction Grammar Analysis.” Lingua 121/1: 60–79.Find this resource:

Barðdal, Jóhanna, Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður, Dahl, Eystein, Eythórsson, Thórhallur, Fedriani, Chiara, and Smitherman, Thomas (2011). “‘Woe to the Rich and the Sordid Fellows’: The Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure of ‘Woe’ in Indo-European.” Ms., University of Bergen. [Under revision for The Journal of Indo-European Studies].Find this resource:

Barðdal, Jóhanna, and Chelliah, Shobhana (eds.) (2009). The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Barðdal, Jóhanna, and Eythórsson, Thórhallur (2003). “The Change that Never Happened: The Story of Oblique Subjects.” Journal of Linguistics 39: 439–72.Find this resource:

———. (2012 a). “Reconstructing Syntax: Construction Grammar and the Comparative Method,” in Hans C. Boas and Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 261–312.Find this resource:

———. (2012 b). “‘Hungering and Lusting for Women and Fleshly Delicacies’: Reconstructing Grammatical Relations for Proto-Germanic.” Transactions of the Philological Society 110/3: 363–93.Find this resource:

Barðdal, Jóhanna, Kristoffersen, Kristian E., and Sveen, Andreas (2011). “West Scandinavian Ditransitives as a Family of Constructions: With a Special Attention to the Norwegian ‘V-REFL-NP’ Construction.” Linguistics 49/1: 53–104.Find this resource:

Barðdal, Jóhanna, and Molnár, Valéria (2003). “The Passive in Icelandic—Compared to Mainland Scandinavian,” in Jorunn Hetland and Valéria Molnár (eds.), Structures of Focus and Grammatical Relations. Linguistische Arbeiten 477. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 231–60.Find this resource:

Barðdal, Jóhanna, and Smitherman, Thomas (2013). “The Quest for Cognates: A Reconstruction of Oblique Subject Constructions in Proto-Indo-European.” Language Dynamics and Change 3/1.Find this resource:

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen (1987). “Markedness and Salience in Second-Language Acquisition.” Language Learning 37: 385–407.Find this resource:

———. (2000). Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Barkema, Henk (1994). “Determining the Syntactic Flexibility of Idioms,” in Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie, and Peter Schneider (eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 39–52.Find this resource:

Barlow, Horace, and Levick, William R. (1965). “The Mechanism of Directionally Selective Units in Rabbit's Retina.” Journal of Physiology 178: 477–504.Find this resource:

Barlow, Michael, and Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.) (2000). Usage Based Models of Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

(p. 515) Baron-Cohen, Simon, Leslie, Alan M., and Frith, Uta (1985). “Does the Autistic Child have a ‘Theory of Mind’?” Cognition 21: 37–46.Find this resource:

Barsalou, Lawrence W. (1999). “Perceptual Symbol Systems.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22/4: 577–609; discussion 610–50.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–45.Find this resource:

Basciano, Bianca (2010). Verbal Compounding and Causativity in Mandarin Chinese. Verona: Università degli Studi di Verona.Find this resource:

Bastiaansen, Marcel, and Hagoort, Peter (2006). “Oscillatory Neuronal Dynamics during Language Comprehension.” Progress in Brain Research 159: 179–96.Find this resource:

Bates, Elizabeth, and Devoscovi, Antonella (1989). “Crosslinguistic Studies of Sentence Production,” in Brian MacWhinney and Elizabeth Bates (eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 225–53.Find this resource:

Bates, Elizabeth, and MacWhinney, Brian (1982). “Functionalist Approaches to Grammar,” in Eric Wanner and Lila Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 173–218.Find this resource:

———. (1987). “Competition, Variation and Language Learning,” in Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 157–93.Find this resource:

———. (1989). “Functionalism and the Competition Model,” in Elizabeth Bates and Brian MacWhinney (eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–73.Find this resource:

Bauer, Laurie (2001). Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Typology of Compounds,” in Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 343–56.Find this resource:

Beck, Sigrid (1997). “On the Semantics of Comparative Conditionals.” Linguistics and Philosophy 20/3: 229–71.Find this resource:

Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morton H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., Holland, John, Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman, Diane, and Schoenemann, Thomas (2009). “Language is a Complex Adaptive System. Position Paper.” Language Learning 59, Supplement 1: 1–26.Find this resource:

Beckner, Clay, and Bybee, Joan (2009). “A Usage-based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis.” Language Learning 59, Supplement 1: 29–48.Find this resource:

Bell, Allan (1984). “Language Style as Audience Design.” Language in Society 13: 145–204.Find this resource:

Bencini, Giulia M. L., and Goldberg, Adele E. (2000). “The Contribution of Argument Structure Constructions to Sentence Meaning.” Journal of Memory and Language 43: 640–51.Find this resource:

Bencini, Giulia M. L., Pozzan, Lucia, Biundo, Roberta, McGeowan, William J., Venneri, Annalena, Valian, Virginia, and Semenza, Carlo (2011). “Language Specific Effects in Alzheimer's Disease: Subject Omission in Italian and English.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 24: 25–40.Find this resource:

Bencini, Giulia M. L., and Valian, Virginia (2008). “Abstract Sentence Representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from Comprehension and Production.” Journal of Memory and Language 59: 97–113.Find this resource:

(p. 516) Bergen, Benjamin K. (2007). “Experimental Methods for Simulation Semantics,” in Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, and Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 277–301.Find this resource:

———. (2012). Louder Than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin K., and Chang, Nancy (2005). “Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding,” in Jan-Ola Ostman and Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 147–90.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin K., Lindsay, Shane, Matlock, Teenie, and Narayanan, Srini (2007). “Spatial and Linguistic Aspects of Visual Imagery in Sentence Comprehension.” Cognitive Science 31: 733–64.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin K., and Plauché, Madelaine (2001). “Voilà Voilà: Extensions of Deictic Constructions in French,” in Alan Cienki, Barbara Luka, and Michael Smith (eds.), Conceptual and Discourse Factors in Linguistic Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 238–49.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin K., Ting-Ting Chan Lau, Narayan, Shweta, Stojanovic, Diana, and Wheeler, Kathryn (2010). “Body Part Representations in Verbal Semantics.” Memory and Cognition 38/7: 969–81.Find this resource:

Bergen, Benjamin K., and Wheeler, Kathryn (2005). “Sentence Understanding Engages Motor Processes.” Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Grammatical Aspect and Mental Simulation.” Brain and Language 112: 150–58.Find this resource:

Bergs, Alexander (2008). “ Shall and shan’t in Contemporary English,” in Graeme Trousdale and Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional Approaches to English Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 113–44.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Expressions of Futurity in Contemporary English: A Construction Grammar Perspective.” English Language and Linguistics 14/2: 217–38.Find this resource:

Bergs, Alexander, and Diewald, Gabriele (eds.) (2008). Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

———. (eds.) (2009). Contexts and Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Berkenfield, Catie (2001). “The Role of Frequency in the Realization of English that,” in Joan L. Bybee and Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 281–308.Find this resource:

Berko, Jean (1958). “The Child's Learning of English Morphology.” Word 14: 150–77.Find this resource:

Berlin, Brent, and Kay, Paul (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Berman, Ruth A., and Slobin, Dan I. (eds.) (1994). Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Berry-Rogghe, Godelieve L. M. (1974). “Automatic Identification of Phrasal Verbs,” in John L. Mitchell (ed.), Computers in the Humanities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 16–26.Find this resource:

Berthele, Raphael (2008). “A Nation is a Territory with One Culture and One Language: The Role of Metaphorical Folk Models in Language Policy Debates,” in Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 301–32.Find this resource:

Bever, Thomas G. (1970). “The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures,” in John R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and Development of Language. New York: Wiley, 279–352.Find this resource:

(p. 517) Bhatia, Vijay K. (1993). Analysing Genre—Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas (1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, and Finegan, Edward (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Bickel, Balthasar, Hildebrandt, Kristine A., and Schiering, René (2009). “The Distribution of Phonological Word Domains: A Probabilistic Typology,” in Bariş Kabak and Janet Grijzenhout (eds.), Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 47–75.Find this resource:

Binder, Jeffrey R., Westbury, Chris F., McKiernan, Kristen A., Possing, Edward T., and Medler, David A. (2005). “Distinct Brain Systems for Processing Concrete and Abstract Concepts.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 905–17.Find this resource:

Birner, Betty J., and Ward, Gregory (1998). Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bisang, Walter (1998). “Grammaticalization and Language Contact, Constructions and Positions,” in Anna Giacalone Ramat and Paul J. Hopper (eds.), The Limits of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–58.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Grammaticalization in Chinese: A Construction-based Account,” in Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language 90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 245–77.Find this resource:

Bjorvand, Harald, and Lindeman, Fredrik Otto (2000). Våre arveord: Etymologisk ordbok. [‘Our Inherited Vocabulary: An Etymological Dictionary.’] Oslo: Novus forlag.Find this resource:

Blevins, James P. (2001). “Realisation-based Lexicalism.” Journal of Linguistics 37: 355–65.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “Word-based Morphology.” Journal of Linguistics 42: 531–73.Find this resource:

Blom, Corrien (2004). “On the Diachrony of Complex Predicates in Dutch: Predicative and Non-predicative Preverbs.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 16: 1–75.Find this resource:

———. (2005 a). Complex Predicates in Dutch: Synchrony and Diachrony. Utrecht: LOT.Find this resource:

———. (2005 b). “The Demarcation of Morphology and Syntax: A Diachronic Perspective on Particle Verbs,” in Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, and Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its Demarcations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 53–66.Find this resource:

Blom, Corrien, and Booij, Geert (2003). “The Diachrony of Complex Predicates in Dutch: A Case Study in Grammaticalization.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50: 61–91.Find this resource:

Blust, Robert (1996). “The Neogrammarian Hypothesis and Pandemic Irregularity,” in Mark Durie and Malcolm Ross (eds.), The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 135–56.Find this resource:

BNC (The British National Corpus). http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/, http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/x.asp.

Boas, Hans C. (2003). A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

(p. 518) ———. (2004). “You Wanna Consider a Constructional Approach to Wanna-Contraction?” in Michael Achard and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, Culture and Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 471–91.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Determining the Productivity of Resultative Constructions: A Reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff.” Language 81/2: 448–64.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “A Frame-semantic Approach to Identifying Syntactically Relevant Elements of Meaning,” in Petra Steiner, Hans C. Boas, and Stefan Schierholz (eds.), Contrastive Studies and Valency: Studies in Honor of Hans Ulrich Boas. Frankfurt and New York: Peter Lang, 119–49.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Determining the Structure of Lexical Entries and Grammatical Constructions in Construction Grammar.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 113–44.Find this resource:

———. (2009 a). “Verb Meanings at the Crossroads between Higher-level and Lower-level Constructions.” Lingua 120: 22–34.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (2009 b). Multilingual FrameNets in Computational Lexicography: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (2010 a). Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

———. (2010 b). “The Syntax-lexicon Continuum in Construction Grammar: A Case Study of English Communication Verbs.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 24: 54–92.Find this resource:

———. (2011 a). “Zum Abstraktionsgrad von Resultativkonstruktionen,” in Stefan Engelberg, Anke Holler, and Kristel Proost (eds.), Sprachliches Wissen z wischen Lexikon und Grammatik. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 37–69.Find this resource:

———. (2011 b). “A Frame-semantic Approach to Syntactic Alternations with Build-verbs,” in Pilar Guerrero Medina (ed.), Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. London: Equinox, 207–34.Find this resource:

Boas, Hans C., and Sag, Ivan (eds.) (2012). Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Bochner, Harry (1993). Simplicity in Generative Morphology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bock, Kathryn (1982). “Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation.” Psychological Review 89: 1–47.Find this resource:

———. (1986 a). “Meaning, Sound and Syntax: Lexical Priming in Sentence Production.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12: 575–86.Find this resource:

———. (1986 b). “Syntactic Persistence in Language Production.” Cognitive Psychology 18: 355–87.Find this resource:

———. (1990). “Structure in Language: Creating Form in Talk.” American Psychologist 45: 1221–36.Find this resource:

———. (1995). “Sentence Production: From Mind to Mouth,” in Joanne L. Miller and Peter D. Eimas (eds.), Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Speech, Language and Communication. Vol. 11. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 181–216.Find this resource:

Bock, Kathryn, Dell, Gary, Chang, Franklin, and Onishi, Kristine (2007). “Persistent Structural Priming from Language Comprehension to Language Production.” Cognition 104: 437–58.Find this resource:

Bock, Kathryn, and Griffin, Zenzi (2000). “The Persistence of Structural Priming: Transient Activation or Implicit Learning?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 177–92.Find this resource:

(p. 519) Bock, Kathryn J., and Irwin, D. E. (1980). “Syntactic Effects of Information Availability in Sentence Production.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19: 467–84.Find this resource:

Bock, Kathryn, and Levelt, Wilhelm (1994). “Language Production: Grammatical Encoding,” in Morton Anne Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, 945–84.Find this resource:

Bock, Kathryn, and Loebell, Helga (1990). “Framing Sentences.” Cognition 35: 1–39.Find this resource:

Bock, Kathryn J., Loebell, Helga, and Morey, Randel (1992). “From Conceptual Roles to Structural Relations: Bridging the Syntactic Cleft.” Psychological Review 99: 150–71.Find this resource:

Bock, Kathryn, and Warren, Richard (1985). “Conceptual Accessibility and Syntactic Structure in Sentence Formulation.” Cognition 21: 57–67.Find this resource:

Bod, Rens (1998). Beyond Grammar: An Experience-based Theory of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Find this resource:

Boers, Frank, and Lindstromberg, Seth (eds.) (2008). Cognitive Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Bolinger, Dwight (1977). Meaning and Form. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Booij, Geert (2002). “Constructional Idioms, Morphology and the Dutch Lexicon.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 301–29.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Compounding and Derivation: Evidence for Construction Morphology,” in Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, and Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its Demarcations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 109–32.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Phrasal Names: A Constructionist Analysis.” Word Structure 3: 219–40.Find this resource:

———. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Borer, Hagit (1994). “The Projection of Arguments.” University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: 19–48.Find this resource:

Borsley, Robert D. (2006). “Syntactic and Lexical Approaches to Unbounded Dependencies.” Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 49: 31–57.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Hang on again! Are we ‘on the Right Track’? Martin Atkinson The Minimalist Muse.” Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 53: 43–70.Find this resource:

Botvinick, Matthew M., and Plaut, David C. (2006). “Short-term Memory for Serial Order: A Recurrent Neural Network Model.” Psychological Review 113/2: 201–33.Find this resource:

Boulenger, Véronique, Hauk, Olaf, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann (2009). “Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Semantic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension.” Cerebral Cortex 19/8: 1905–14.Find this resource:

Bourdieu, Pierre (1979). La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit.Find this resource:

Bowerman, Melissa (1973). Early Syntactic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1982 a). “Evaluating Competing Linguistic Models with Language Acquisition Data: Implications of Developmental Errors with Causative Verbs.” Quaderni di Semantica 3: 5–66.Find this resource:

———. (1982 b). “Reorganizational Processes in Lexical and Syntactic Development,” in Eric Wanner and Lila R. Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 319–46.Find this resource:

———. (1988). “The ‘No Negative Evidence’ Problem: How do Children Avoid Constructing an Overly General Grammar,” in John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining Language Universals. New York: Blackwell, 73–101.Find this resource:

(p. 520) Bowern, Claire (2008). “Syntactic Change and Syntactic Reconstruction in Generative Grammar,” in Gisella Ferraresi and Maria Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 187–216.Find this resource:

Boyd, Jeremy K., and Goldberg, Adele E. (2009). “Input Effects within a Constructionist Framework.” Modern Language Journal 93/2: 418–29.Find this resource:

———. (2011). “Learning What Not to Say: The Role of Statistical Preemption and Categorization in a-adjective Production.” Language 87/1: 55–83.Find this resource:

Braine, Martin D. S. (1976). “Children's First Word Combinations.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41/1: 1–104.Find this resource:

Braine, Martin D. S., and Brooks, Patricia (1995). “Verb-argument Structure and the Problem of Avoiding an Overgeneral Grammar,” in Michael Tomasello and William Merriman (eds.), Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 353–76.Find this resource:

Branigan, Holly, Pickering, Martin, Liversedge, Simon, Stewart, Andrew, and Urbach, Thomas (1995). “Syntactic Priming: Investigating the Mental Representation of Language.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24: 489–506.Find this resource:

Branigan, Holly, Pickering, Martin, and Tanaka, Mikihiro (2008). “Contributions of Animacy to Grammatical Function Assignment and Word Order during Production.” Lingua 118: 172–89.Find this resource:

Bratman, Michael (1992). “Shared Cooperative Activity.” Philosophical Review 101: 327–41.Find this resource:

———. (1993). “Shared Intention.” Ethics 104: 97–113.Find this resource:

———. (1997). “I Intend that we J,” in Raimo Tuomela and Ghita Holmstrom-Hintikka (eds.), Contemporary Action Theory. Vol. II. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 49–63.Find this resource:

Brems, Lieselotte (2007). “The Grammaticalization of Small Size Nouns: Reconsidering Frequency and Analogy.” Journal of English Linguistics 35: 294–324.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Size Noun Constructions as Collocationally Constrained Constructions: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses.” English Language and Linguistics 14: 83–109.Find this resource:

Brenier, Jason M., and Michaelis, Laura A. (2005). “Optimization via Syntactic Amalgam: Syntax-prosody Mismatch and Copula Doubling.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 45–88.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan (1982). The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (2001). Lexical Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana, and Baayen, R. Harald (2007). “Predicting the Dative Alternation,” in Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer, and Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 69–94.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Ford, Marilyn (2010). “Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English.” Language 86: 186–213.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Hay, Jennifer (2008). “Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of Give in New Zealand and American English.” Lingua 118: 245–59.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Kanerva, Jonni (1989). “Locative Inversion in Chichewa.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1–50.Find this resource:

Bresnan, Joan, and Kaplan, Ronald (1984). “Grammars as Mental Representations of Language,” in Walter Kintsch and Peter Polson (eds.), Methods and Tactics in Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 103–35.Find this resource:

Brinton, Laurel J., and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 521) Broccias, Cristiano (2011). “Motivating the Flexibility of Oriented –ly Adverbs,” in Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden (eds.), Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 71–88.Find this resource:

Broccias, Cristiano, and Hollmann, Willem B. (2007). “Do We Need Summary and Sequential Scanning in (Cognitive) Grammar?” Cognitive Linguistics 18: 487–522.Find this resource:

Brooks, Patricia, and Tomasello, Michael (1999 a). “Young Children Learn to Produce Passives with Nonce Verbs.” Developmental Psychology 35: 29–44.Find this resource:

———. (1999 b). “How Children Constrain their Argument Structure Constructions.” Language 75: 720–38.Find this resource:

———. (1999 c). “Learning the English Passive Construction,” in Barbara Fox, Dan Jurafsky, and Laura Michaelis (eds.), Cognition and Function in Language. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications, 84–98.Find this resource:

Brooks, Patricia, Tomasello, Michael, Dodson, Kelly, and Lewis, Lawrence B. (1999). “Young Children's Overgeneralizations with Fixed Transitivity Verbs.” Child Development 70: 1325–37.Find this resource:

BROWN (One million word corpus of American English). http://khnt.aksis.uib.no/icame/manuals/index.htm.

Brown, Amanda, and Gullberg, Marianne (2008). “Bidirectional Crosslinguistic Influence in L1-L2 Encoding of Manner in Speech and Gesture.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30: 225–51.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Changes in Encoding of Path of Motion after Acquisition of a Second Language.” Cognitive Linguistics 21: 263–86.Find this resource:

Brugman, Claudia (1988). The Story of “Over”: Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland.Find this resource:

Brunyé, Tad, Ditman, Tali, Mahoney, Caroline, Augustyn, Jason, and Taylor, Holly (2009). “When You and I Share Perspectives: Pronouns Modulate Perspective Taking During Narrative.” Psychological Science 20: 27–32.Find this resource:

Bryant, John (2004). “Scalable Construction Based Parsing and Semantic Analysis.” Proceedings of the Second International workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding, Boston, 33–44.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Best-Fit Constructional Analysis”. Ph.D. dissertation. Computer Science Department, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Budwig, Nancy, Narasimhan, Bhuvana, and Srivastava, Smita (2006). “Interim Solutions: The Acquisition of Early Verb Constructions in Hindi,” in Eve V. Clark and Barbara F. Kelly (eds.), Constructions in Acquisition. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 163–83.Find this resource:

Buzsáki, György (2010). “Neural Syntax: Cell Assemblies, Synapsembles and Readers.” Neuron 68/3: 362–85.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology: A Study into the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

———. (1988 a). “Morphology as Lexical Organization,” in Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical Morphology. San Diego: Academic Press, 119–41.Find this resource:

———. (1988 b). “Semantic Substance vs. Contrast in the Development of Grammatical Meaning.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 14: 247–64.Find this resource:

———. (2000). “The Phonology of the Lexicon: Evidence from Lexical Diffusion,” in Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 65–85.Find this resource:

———. (2001). Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 522) ———. (2002). “Sequentiality as the Basis of Constituent Structure,” in Talmy Givón and Bertram Malle (eds.), The Evolution of Language from Pre-Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 109–32.Find this resource:

———. (2003). “Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency,” in Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 602–23.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition.” Language 82: 711–33.Find this resource:

———. (2007). Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Usage-based Grammar and Second Language Acquisition,” in Peter Robinson and Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 216–36.Find this resource:

———. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Beckner, Clay (2009). “Usage-based Theory,” in Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine (eds.), Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 827–55.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Eddington, David (2006). “A Usage-based Approach to Spanish Verbs of ‘Becoming’.” Language 82: 323–55.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Hopper, Paul (eds.) (2001). Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Pagliuca, William (1987). “The Evolution of Future Meaning,” in Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, and Guiliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the VIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 109–22.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere, and Pagliuca, William (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Scheibman, Joanne (1999). “The Effect of Usage on Degrees of Constituency: The Reduction of don’t in English.” Linguistics 37: 575–96.Find this resource:

Bybee, Joan L., and Thompson, Sandra (2000). “Three Frequency Effects in Syntax.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 23: 65–85.Find this resource:

Cacciari, Cristina, and Glucksberg, Sam. (1991). “Understanding Idiomatic Expressions: The Contribution of Word Meanings,” in Greg Simpson (ed.), Understanding Word and Sentence. The Hague: North Holland, 217–40.Find this resource:

Cacciari, Cristina, and Tabossi, Patrizia. (eds.). (1995). Idioms: Processing, Structure and Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Find this resource:

Cadierno, Teresa (2008). “Learning to Talk about Motion in a Foreign Language,” in Peter Robinson and Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge. 239–75.Find this resource:

Canolty, Ryan T., Soltani, Maryam, Dalal, Sarang S., Edwards, Erik, Dronkers, Nina F., Nagarajan, Srikantan S., Kirsch, Heidi E., Barbaro, Nicholas M., and Knight, Robert T. (2007). “Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Word Processing in the Human Brain.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 1/1: 185–96.Find this resource:

Caplan, David (2006). “Aphasic Deficits in Syntactic Processing.” Cortex 42/6: 797–804.Find this resource:

Cappelle, Bert (2009). “Contextual Cues for Particle Placement: Multiplicity, Motivation, Modelling,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Contexts and Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 145–92.Find this resource:

(p. 523) ———. (2011). “The thethe…Construction: Meaning and Readings.” Journal of Pragmatics 43/1: 99–117.Find this resource:

Cappelle, Bert, Shtyrov, Yury, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann (2010). “ Heating up or Cooling up the Brain? MEG Evidence that Phrasal verbs are Lexical Units.” Brain and Language 115/3: 189–201.Find this resource:

Caramazza, Alfonso (1997). “How Many Levels of Processing are There in Lexical Access?” Cognitive Neuropsychology 14: 177–208.Find this resource:

Carlson, G. (2006). “The Meaningful Bounds of Incorporation,” in Svetlana Vogeleer and Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Non-definiteness and Plurality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 35–50.Find this resource:

Carpenter, Bob. (1992). The Logic of Typed Feature Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Casenhiser, Devin, and Goldberg, Adele E. (2005). “Fast Mapping between a Phrasal Form and Meaning.” Developmental Science 8: 500–508.Find this resource:

CEEC (Corpus of Early English Correspondence). http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/domains/CEEC.html.

Chafe, Wallace (1968). “Idiomaticity as an Anomaly in the Chomskyan Paradigm.” Foundations of Language 4/2: 109–27.Find this resource:

———. (1976). “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects and Topics,” in Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. London: Academic Press, 27–55.Find this resource:

———. (1977 a). “Creativity in Verbalization and its Implications for the Nature of Stored Knowledge,” in Roy Freedle (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 41–55.Find this resource:

———. (1977 b). “The Recall and Verbalization of Past Experience,” in Peter Cole (ed.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 215–46.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (1980). The Pear Stories. New York: Ablex.Find this resource:

———. (1987). “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow,” in Russell Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Typological Studies in Language, Vol. XI. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 21–52.Find this resource:

———. (1994). Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Chang, Franklin (2002). “Symbolically Speaking: A Connectionist Model of Sentence Production.” Cognitive Science 26: 609–51.Find this resource:

Chang, Franklin, Bock, J. Kathryn, and Goldberg, Adele E. (2003). “Can Thematic Roles Leave Traces of Their Places?” Cognition 90: 29–49.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “Becoming Syntactic.” Psychological Review 113/2: 232–72.Find this resource:

Chang, Franklin, Dell, Gary S., Bock, J. Kathryn and Griffin, Zenzi M. (2000). “Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29: 217–29.Find this resource:

Chang, Nancy (2008). “Constructing Grammar: A Computational Model of the Emergence of Early Constructions.” Ph.D. dissertation. Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley.Find this resource:

Chang, Nancy, Feldman, Jerome, Porzel, Robert, and Sanders, Keith (2002). “Scaling Cognitive Linguistics: Formalisms for Language Understanding,” in Proc. 1st International Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding. Heidelberg, Germany, 10–17.Find this resource:

Chang, Nancy, and Gurevich, Olya (2004). “Context-driven Construction Learning,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Chicago, IL, 204–9.Find this resource:

(p. 524) Chang, Nancy, and Mok, Eva. (2006). “A Structured Context Model for Grammar Learning,” in Proceedings of the 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Vancouver, BC, 1604–11.Find this resource:

Chao, Linda L., Haxby, James V., and Martin, Alex (1999). “Attribute-based Neural Substrates in Temporal Cortex for Perceiving and Knowing about Objects.” Nature Neuroscience 2/10: 913–19.Find this resource:

Chater, Nick, and Manning, Christopher D. (2006). “Probabilistic Models of Language Processing and Acquisition.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10/7: 335–44.Find this resource:

Chen, Jidong (2006). “The Acquisition of Verb Compounding in Mandarin,” in Eve V. Clark and Barbara F. Kelly (eds.), Constructions in Acquisition. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 111–35.Find this resource:

Chenu, Florence, and Jisa, Harriet (2006). “Caused Motion Constructions and Semantic Generality in Early Acquisition of French,” in Eve V. Clark and Barbara F. Kelly (eds.), Constructions in Acquisition. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 233–61.Find this resource:

Cheshire, Jenny, and Fox, Sue (2009). “ Was/were Variation: A Perspective from London.” Language Variation and Change 21: 1–23.Find this resource:

Childers, Jane B., and Tomasello, Michael (2001). “The Role of Pronouns in Young Children's Acquisition of the English Transitive Construction.” Developmental Psychology 37: 739–48.Find this resource:

Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Find this resource:

———. (1962). “The Logical Basis of Linguistic Theory,” in Morris Halle (ed.), Reprints of the Papers of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, August 27–31, 1962, 509–74.Find this resource:

———. (1963). “Formal Properties of Grammars,” in R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush, and Eugene Galanter (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. Vol. 2. New York and London: Wiley, 323–418.Find this resource:

———. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (1972). Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Princeton.Find this resource:

———. (1973). “Conditions on Transformations,” in Stephan Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 232–86.Find this resource:

———. (1977). “On WH-movement,” in Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 71–132.Find this resource:

———. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht. Foris.Find this resource:

———. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (1993). “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,” in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.Find this resource:

———. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (1999). “On the Nature, Use and Acquisition of language,” in William C. Ritchie and Tej K. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of Child Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–54.Find this resource:

———. (2000 a). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2000 b). “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework,” in Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.Find this resource:

(p. 525) Christiansen, Morton H., and Chater, Nick (eds.) (2001). Connectionist Psycholinguistics. Westport, CO: Ablex.Find this resource:

Church, Kenneth, Gale, William, Hanks, Patrick, and Hindle, Donald (1991). “Using Statistics in Lexical Analysis,” in Uri Zernik (ed.), Lexical Acquisition: Exploiting On-Line Resources to Build a Lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 115–64.Find this resource:

Clark, Eve V. (1978). “Discovering What Words can do,” in Donka Farkas, Wesley M. Jacobsen, and Karol W. Todrys (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, Chicago Linguistics Society April 14–15, 1978. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, 34–57.Find this resource:

———. (1987). “The Principle of Contrast: A Constraint on Language Acquisition,” in Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1–33.Find this resource:

———. (2003). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H. (1992). Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

———. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1999). “On the Origins of Conversation.” Verbum 21: 147–61.Find this resource:

Clark, Herbert H., and Malt, Barbara (1984). “Psychological Constraints on Language: A Commentary on Bresnan and Kaplan and on Givón,” in Walter Kintsch and Peter Polson, (eds.), Methods and Tactics in Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 191–214.Find this resource:

Clark, Lynn, and Trousdale, Graeme (2009). “The Role of Token Frequency in Phonological Change: Evidence from TH-fronting in East-central Scotland.” English Language and Linguistics 13: 33–56.Find this resource:

CLMET (Corpus of Late Modern English Texts). https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/.

Cobb, Tom (2007). The Compleat Lexical Tutor (v.4.5 03/06) for Data-driven Language Learning on the Web. http://132.208.224.131/.

Colleman, Timothy (2009 a). “The Semantic Range of the Dutch Double Object Construction: A Collostructional Perspective.” Constructions and Frames 1: 190–221.Find this resource:

———. (2009 b). “Verb Disposition in Argument Structure Alternations: A Corpus Study of the Dative Alternation in Dutch.” Language Sciences 31: 593–611.Find this resource:

Collins, Allan M., and Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1975). “The Spreading Activation Theory of Semantic Processing.” Psychological Review 82: 407–28.Find this resource:

Collins Cobuild Dictionary of Idioms (2002) (2nd edn.). London: Harper Collins.Find this resource:

Collins, Laura, and Ellis, Nick. C. (2009). “Input and Second Language Construction Learning: Frequency, Form and Function.” Modern Language Journal 93/2: 329–35.Find this resource:

Comrie, Bernard (1978). “Ergativity,” in Winfred Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology. Austin: University of Texas Press, 329–94.Find this resource:

Connell, Louise (2007). “Representing Object Colour in Language Comprehension.” Cognition 102: 476–85.Find this resource:

Copestake, Ann (2002). Implementing Typed Feature Structure Grammars. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Copestake, Ann, Flickinger, Daniel, Pollard, Carl J., and Sag, Ivan A. (2005). “Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction.” Research on Language and Computation 3: 281–332.Find this resource:

Corder, S. Pit (1973). Introducing Applied Linguistics. New York: Penguin.Find this resource:

(p. 526) Corrigan, Roberta, Moravcsik, Edith, Ouali, Hamid, and Wheatley, Kathleen (eds.) (2009). Formulaic Language. Typological Studies in Language 82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,Find this resource:

Coulson, Seana (2007). “Electrifying Results: ERP Data and Cognitive Linguistics,” in Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, and Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 400–23.Find this resource:

Coupland, Nikolas (1988). Styles of Discourse. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Coventry, Kenny R., and Garrod, Simon C. (2004). Saying, Seeing and Acting: The Psychological Semantics of Spatial Prepositions. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

Cowie, Anthony P. (ed.) (2001). Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Cowie, Anthony P., and Howarth, Peter. (1996). “Phraseology—A Select Bibliography.” International Journal of Lexicography 9/1: 38–51.Find this resource:

Cresswell, Tim (2004). Place—A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Cristofaro, Sonia (2003). Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Deconstructing Categories: Finiteness in a Functional-Typological Perspective,” in Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91–114.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “A Constructional Approach to Complementation: Evidence from Ancient Greek.” Linguistics 46: 571–606.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Grammatical Categories and Relations: Universality vs. Language-specificity and Construction-specificity.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3/1: 441–79.Find this resource:

———. (forthcoming). “Is Subordination a Syntactic Category of Particular Languages?” in Ilona Herlin, Jyrki Kalliokoski, and Laura Visapää (eds.), Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, Typological and Discourse Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Croft, William (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1998). “Linguistic Evidence and Mental Representations.” Cognitive Linguistics 9: 151–73.Find this resource:

———. (1999). “What (some) Functionalists can Learn from (some) Formalists,” in Michael Darnell, Edith Moravcsik, Frederick Newmeyer, Michael Noonan, and Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Vol. 1: General Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 85–108.Find this resource:

———. (2000). Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.Find this resource:

———. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2003 a). “Lexical Rules vs. Constructions: A False Dichotomy,” in Hubert Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, Rene Dirven, and Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in Language: Studies in Honour of Günter Radden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49–68.Find this resource:

———. (2003b). Typology and Universals (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2005 a). “Logical and Typological Arguments for Radical Construction Grammar,” in Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: (p. 527) Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 273–314.Find this resource:

———. (2005 b). “Word Classes, Parts of Speech and Syntactic Argumentation: Commentary on Evans and Osada, ‘Mundari: The Myth of a Language without Word Classes’.” Linguistic Typology 9: 431–41.Find this resource:

———. (2007 a). “Beyond Aristotle and Gradience: A Reply to Aarts.” Studies in Language 31: 409–30.Find this resource:

———. (2007 b). “The Origins of Grammar in the Verbalization of Experience.” Cognitive Linguistics 18: 339–82.Find this resource:

———. (2007c). “Intonation Units and Grammatical Structure in Wardaman and in Crosslinguistic Perspective.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 27: 1–39.Find this resource:

———. (2009 a). “Methods for Finding Language Universals in Syntax,” in Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni, and Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of Language Today. Berlin: Springer, 145–64.Find this resource:

———. (2009 b). “Toward a Social Cognitive Linguistics,” in Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 395–420.Find this resource:

———. (2009 c). “Connecting Frames and Constructions: A Case Study of eat and feed.” Constructions and Frames 1: 7–28.Find this resource:

———. (2010 a). “Pragmatic Function, Semantic Classes and Lexical Categories: Commentary on Smith, ‘Pragmatic Functions and Lexical Categories’.” Linguistics 48: 787–96.Find this resource:

———. (2010 b). “Ten Unwarranted Assumptions in Syntactic Argumentation,” in Kasper Bøye and Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds.), Language Usage and Language Structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 313–50.Find this resource:

———. (2010c). “Relativity, Linguistic Variation and Language Universals.” CogniTextes 4.303,http://cognitextes.revues.org/303/.

———. (2010 d). “The Origins of Grammaticalization in the Verbalization of Experience.” Linguistics 48: 1–48.Find this resource:

———. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. In preparation. Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World's Languages.Find this resource:

Croft, William, Barðdal, Jóhanna, Hollmann, Willem, Sotirova, Violeta, and Taoka, Chiaki (2010). “Revising Talmy's Typological Classification of Complex Events,” in Hans Boas (ed.), Contrastive Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 201–35.Find this resource:

Croft, William, and Cruse, D. Alan (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Croft, William, and Poole, Keith T. (2008). “Inferring Universals from Grammatical Variation: Multidimensional Scaling for Typological Analysis.” Theoretical Linguistics 34: 1–37.Find this resource:

Croft, William, Shyldkrot, Hava Bat-Zeev, and Kemmer, Suzanne (1987). “Diachronic Semantic Processes in the Middle Voice,” in Anna Giacolone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, and Guiliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 179–92.Find this resource:

Culicover, Peter W. (1972). “OM-sentences.” Foundations of Language 8: 199–236.Find this resource:

———. (1999). Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory and Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Culicover, Peter W., and Jackendoff, Ray (1995). “Something Else for the Binding Theory.” Linguistic Inquiry 26: 249–75.Find this resource:

(p. 528) ———. (1997). “Semantic Subordination Despite Syntactic Coordination.” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 195–217.Find this resource:

———. (1999). “The View from the Periphery: The English Comparative Correlative.” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 543–71.Find this resource:

———. (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2012). “Same-Except: A Domain-general Cognitive Relation and How Language Expresses It.” Language 88: 305–40.Find this resource:

Culioli, Antoine (1990). Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Vol. 1: Opérations et représentations. Paris: Ophrys.Find this resource:

Cutting, J. Cooper, and Ferreira, Victor S. (1999). “Semantic and Phonological Information Flow in the Production Lexicon.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25/2: 318–44.Find this resource:

Cuyckens, Hubert, Berg, Thomas, Dirven, René, and Panther, Klaus-Uwe (eds.) (2003). Motivation in Language: Studies in Honor of Günther Radden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Dąbrowska, Eva (2000). “From Formula to Schema: The Acquisition of English Questions.” Cognitive Linguistics 11: 83–102.Find this resource:

———. (2004). Language, Mind and Brain: Some Psychological and Neurological Constraints on Theories of Grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Questions with Long Distance Dependencies: A Usage-based Perspective.” Cognitive Linguistics 19: 391–425.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Words as Constructions,” in Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 201–23.Find this resource:

Dąbrowska, Eva, and Lieven, Elena (2005). “Towards a Lexically Specific Grammar of Children's Question Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 16: 437–74.Find this resource:

Dąbrowska, Eva, Rowland, Caroline, and Theakston, Anna (2009). “The Acquisition of Questions with Long-Distance Dependencies.” Cognitive Linguistics 20: 571–98.Find this resource:

Dahaene, Stanislaus (2009). Reading in the Brain. New York: Penguin.Find this resource:

Dahl, Östen (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Dalrymple, Mary, Kaplan, Ron, Maxwell, John, and Zaenen, Anne (1995). Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Dancygier, Barbara, and Sweetser, Eve (1997). “ Then in Conditional Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 8: 109–36.Find this resource:

———. (2005). Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Daneš, František (1964). “A Three Level Approach to Syntax,” in František Daneš (ed.), Travaux de Linguistique de Prague. Vol. 1. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 225–40.Find this resource:

Davies, Mark (2004−). BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus. http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc.

Davies, Mark (2008−). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ Million Words, 1990-present. http://www.americancorpus.org.

Deacon, Terrance (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. London: Penguin.Find this resource:

Deane, Paul (1991). “Limits to Attention: A Cognitive Theory of Island Phenomena.” Cognitive Linguistics 2: 1–63.Find this resource:

De Clerck, Bernard, and Colleman, Timothey (forthcoming). “ From noun to intensifier: massa and massa's in Flemish varieties of Dutch.” Language Sciences.Find this resource:

(p. 529) Delbrück, Berthold (1893–1900). Vergleichende Syntax der Indogermanischen Sprachen. Strasbourg: Trübner.Find this resource:

Dell, Garry S. (1986). “A Spreading-activation Theory of Retrieval in Sentence Production.” Psychological Review 93: 283–321.Find this resource:

Den Dikken, Marcel. (2005). “Comparative Correlatives Comparatively.” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 497–532.Find this resource:

De Rooij, Jaap (1991). “Regionale Variatie in het Gebruik van er III.” Taal en Tongval 43: 113–36.Find this resource:

de Saussure, Ferdinand (1916). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Find this resource:

———. (2006). Course in General Linguistics. Ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. Trans. Roy Harris. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Find this resource:

De Swart, Henriëtte (1998). “Aspect Shift and Coercion.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 347–85.Find this resource:

Deuchar, Margaret, and Vihman, Marilyn (2005). “A Radical Approach to Early Mixed Utterances.” International Journal of Bilingualism 9: 137–57.Find this resource:

Deulofeu, Henri-José, and Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie (2009). “Constructions and Context: When a Construction Constructs the Context,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Contexts and Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43–62.Find this resource:

De Vogelaer, Gunther (2008). “(De)grammaticalization as a Source for New Constructions: The Case of Subject Doubling in Dutch,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 229–57.Find this resource:

Diessel, Holger (2004). The Acquisition of Complex Sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Competing Motivations for the Ordering of Main and Adverbial clauses.” Linguistics 43: 449–70.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition, Language Use, and Diachronic Change.” New Ideas in Psychology 25: 108–27.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “On the Role of Frequency and Similarity in the Acquisition of Subject and Non-subject Relative Clauses,” in Talmy Givón and Masayoshi Shibatani (eds.), Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 251–76.Find this resource:

Diessel, Holger, and Tomasello, Michael (1999). “Why Complement Clauses do not Include a that-Complementizer in Early Child Language.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 25: 86–97.Find this resource:

———. (2000). “The Development of Relative Clauses in English.” Cognitive Linguistics 11: 131–51.Find this resource:

———. (2001). “The Acquisition of Finite Complement Clauses in English: A Corpus-based Analysis.” Cognitive Linguistics 12: 1–45.Find this resource:

———. (2005 a). “A New Look at the Acquisition of Relative Clauses.” Language 81: 1–25.Find this resource:

———. (2005 b). “Particle Placement in Early Child Language: A Multifactorial Analysis.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 89–112.Find this resource:

Dietrich, Rainer, Klein, Wolfgang, and Noyau, Colette (eds.) (1995). The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Diewald, Gabriele (2006). “Context Types in Grammaticalization as Constructions.” Constructions SV1–9/2006. http://www.elanguage.net/journals/index.php/constructions/index.

(p. 530) ———. (2007). “Konstruktionen in der Diachronen Sprachwissenschaft,” in Kerstin Fischer and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 79–104.Find this resource:

DiSciullo, Anna Maria, and Williams, Edwin (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Dodge, Ellen (2010). “Constructional and Conceptual Composition.” Ph.D. dissertation, Linguistics Department, University of California at Berkeley.Find this resource:

Dominey, Peter (2006). “From Holophrases to Abstract Grammatical Constructions: Insights from Simulation Studies,” in Eve V. Clark and Barbara F. Kelly (eds.), Constructions in Acquisition. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 137–61.Find this resource:

Dominey, Peter, and Hoen, Michael (2006). “Structure Mapping and Semantic Integration in a Construction-based Neurolinguistic Model of Sentence Processing.” Cortex 42: 476–79.Find this resource:

Dominey, Peter, Hoen, Michael, Blanc, Jean-Marc, and Lelekov-Boissard, Taïssia (2003). “Neurological Basis of Language and Sequential Cognition: Evidence from Simulation, Aphasia and ERP Studies.” Brain and Language 8/2: 207–25.Find this resource:

Donchin, Emanuel (1981). “Surprise!…Surprise?” Psychophysiology 18: 493–513.Find this resource:

Dong, Quang Phuc (1971). “The Applicability of Transformation to Idioms.” Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 198–205.Find this resource:

Doughty, Cathy, and Williams, Jennifer (eds.) (1998). Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Dowty, David (1991). “Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection.” Language 67: 547–619.Find this resource:

Dryer, Matthew S. (1997). “Are Grammatical Relations Universal?” in Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 115–43.Find this resource:

Eckert, Penelope, and Rickford, John R. (eds.) (2002). Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Eckhoff, Hanne Partine (2006). “Old Russian Possessive Constructions: A Construction Grammar Account.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oslo. http://folk.uio.no/hanneme/EckhoffDissertation.pdf.Find this resource:

Eddington, David (2000). “Stress Assignment in Spanish within the Analogical Modeling of Language.” Language 76: 92–109.Find this resource:

Edelman, Shimon (2007). “Bridging Language with the Rest of Cognition,” in Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, and Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 424–45.Find this resource:

Ehrsson, Henrik H., Geyer, Stefan, and Naito, Eiichi (2003). “Imagery of Voluntary Movement of Fingers, Toes and Tongue Activates Corresponding Body-part Specific Motor Representations.” Journal of Neurophysiology 90: 3304–16.Find this resource:

Elio, Renee, and Anderson, John R. (1981). “The Effects of Category Generalizations and Instance Similarity on Schema Abstraction.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7/6: 397–417.Find this resource:

———. (1984). “The Effects of Information Order and Learning Mode on Schema Abstraction.” Memory and Cognition 12/1: 20–30.Find this resource:

Ellis, Nick C. (1996). “Sequencing in SLA: Phonological Memory, Chunking and Points of Order.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18/1: 91–126.Find this resource:

———. (1998). “Emergentism, Connectionism and Language Learning.” Language Learning 48/4: 631–64.Find this resource:

(p. 531) ———. (2001). “Memory for Language,” in Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–68.Find this resource:

———. (2002). “Frequency Effects in Language Processing: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24/2: 143–88.Find this resource:

———. (2003). “Constructions, Chunking and Connectionism: The Emergence of Second Language Structure,” in Catherine Doughty and Michael H. Long (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, 63–103.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “At the Interface: Dynamic Interactions of Explicit and Implicit Language Knowledge.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 305–52.Find this resource:

———. (2006 a). “Cognitive Perspectives on SLA: The Associative Cognitive CREED.” AILA Review 19: 100–121.Find this resource:

———. (2006 b). “Language Acquisition as Rational Contingency Learning.” Applied Linguistics 27/1: 1–24.Find this resource:

———. (2006 c). “Selective Attention and Transfer Phenomena in SLA: Contingency, Cue Competition, Salience, Interference, Overshadowing, Blocking and Perceptual Learning.” Applied Linguistics 27/2: 1–31.Find this resource:

———. (2008 a). “The Dynamics of Language Use, Language Change and First and Second Language Acquisition.” Modern Language Journal 41/3: 232–49.Find this resource:

———. (2008 b). “Usage-based and Form-focused Language Acquisition: The Associative Learning of Constructions, Learned-attention and the Limited L2 Endstate,” in Peter Robinson and Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 372–405.Find this resource:

Ellis, Nick C., and Cadierno, Teresa (2009). “Constructing a Second language.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7 (special section): 111–39.Find this resource:

Ellis, Nick C., and Ferreira, Fernando, Jr. (2009 a). “Construction Learning as a Function of Frequency, Frequency Distribution and Function.” Modern Language Journal 93: 370–86.Find this resource:

———. (2009 b). “Constructions and their Acquisition: Islands and the Distinctiveness of their Occupancy.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 187–220.Find this resource:

Ellis, Nick C., and Laporte, Nadine (1997). “Contexts of Acquisition: Effects of Formal Instruction and Naturalistic Exposure on Second Language Acquisition,” in Annette M. De Groot and Judith F. Kroll (eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 53–83.Find this resource:

Ellis, Nick C., and Larsen Freeman, Diane (eds.) (2006a). “Language Emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics.” Applied Linguistics 27/4 (whole issue).Find this resource:

———. (2006 b). “Language Emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Applied Linguistics 27/4: 558–89.Find this resource:

———. (2009 a). “Constructing a Second language: Analyses and Computational Simulations of the Emergence of Linguistic Constructions from Usage.” Language Learning 59, Supplement 1: 93–128.Find this resource:

———. (eds.) (2009b). “Language as a Complex Adaptive System.” Language Learning 59, Supplement 1.Find this resource:

Ellis, Nick C., and Sagarra, Nuria (2010 a). “Learned Attention Effects in L2 Temporal Reference: The First Hour and the Next Eight Semesters.” Language Learning 60, Supplement 2: 85–108.Find this resource:

———. (2010 b). “The Bounds of Adult Language Acquisition: Blocking and Learned Attention.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32/4: 553–80.Find this resource:

(p. 532) ———. (2011). “Learned Attention in Adult Language Acquisition: A Replication and Generalization Study and Meta-analysis.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33/4: 589–624.Find this resource:

Ellis, Rod (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2001). “Introduction: Investigating Form-focused Instruction.” Language Learning 51, Supplement 1: 1–46.Find this resource:

Elman, Jeffrey L. (2004). “An Alternative View of the Mental Lexicon.” Trends in Cognitive Science 8: 301–6.Find this resource:

Elman, Jeffrey L., and Bates, Elizabeth (1997). “Response to Letters.” Science 276: 1180.Find this resource:

Elman, Jeffrey L., Bates, Elizabeth, Johnson, Mark H., Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domencio, and Plunckett, Kim (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.Find this resource:

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi (1979). “Discourse Constraints on Dative Movement,” in Talmy Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 441–67.Find this resource:

———. (1998). “The Syntax-Focus Structure Interface,” in Peter Culicover and Louise McNally (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 29: The Limits of Syntax. New York: Academic Press. 211–40.Find this resource:

———. (2007). Information Structure: The Syntax–Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas (2007). “Insubordination and its Uses,” in Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 366–431.Find this resource:

Evans, Nicholas, and Levinson, Stephen (2009). “The Myth of Language Universals.” Brain and Behavioral Sciences 32: 429–92.Find this resource:

Evans, Vyvyan, and Green, Melanie (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Eythórsson, Thórhallur, and Barðdal, Jóhanna (2005). “Oblique Subjects: A Common Germanic Inheritance.” Language 81/4: 824–81.Find this resource:

———. (2011). “Die Konstruktionsgrammatik und die komparative Methode,” in Thomas Krisch and Thomas Lindner (eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 148–56.Find this resource:

Family, Neiloufar (2006). “Exploration of Semantic Space: The Case of Light Verb Constructions in Persian.” Ph.D. dissertation, EHESS, Paris.Find this resource:

Fauconnier, Gilles (1975). “Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure.” Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353–75.Find this resource:

———. (1985). Mental Spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Feldman, Jerome (2006). From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Feldman, Jerome, and L. Gilardi, Luca (forthcoming). “Extending ECG to Communities, Mental Spaces and Maps,” in Hans C. Boas (ed.), Computational Approaches to Embodied Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Feldman, Jerome, and Narayanan, Srinivas (2004). “Embodied Meaning in a Neural Theory of Language.” Brain and Language 89/2: 385–92.Find this resource:

Fernando, Chitra (1996). Idioms and Idiomaticity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 533) Ferraresi, Gisella, and Goldbach, Maria (eds.) (2008). Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Fernanda (1991). “Effects of Length and Syntactic Complexity on Initiation Times for Prepared Utterances.” Journal of Memory and Language 30: 210–33.Find this resource:

———. (2000). “Syntax in Language Production: An Approach Using Tree-adjoining Grammars,” in Linda Wheeldon (ed.), Aspects of Language Production. London: Psychology Press, 291–330.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Fernanda, and Engelhardt, Paul (2006). “Syntax in Production,” in Mathew Traxler and Morton Ann Gernsbacher (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, 61–91.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Fernanda, and Henderson, John (1988). “Linearization Strategies during Language Production.” Memory and Cognition 26: 88–96.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Fernanda, and Swets, Benjamin (2002). “How Incremental is Language Production? Evidence from the Production of Utterances Requiring the Computation of Arithmetic Sums.” Journal of Memory and Language 46: 57–84.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Victor (1996). “Is it Better to Give or to Donate? Syntactic Flexibility in Language Production.” Journal of Memory and Language 35: 724–55.Find this resource:

———. (2000). “Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production.” Cognitive Psychology 40: 296–340.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Victor, and Dell, Gary S. (2000). “Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production.” Cognitive Psychology 40: 296–340.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Victor, and Humphreys, Karin (2001). “Syntactic Influences on Lexical and Morphological Processing in Language Production.” Journal of Memory and Language 44: 52–80.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Victor, and Slevc, Robert (2007). “Grammatical Encoding,” in Gareth Gaskell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 453–69.Find this resource:

Ferreira, Victor, and Yoshita, Hiromi (2003). “Given-new Ordering Effects on the Production of Scrambled Sentences in Japanese.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32: 669–92.Find this resource:

Fiksdal, Susan (2008). “Metaphorically Speaking: Gender and Classroom Discourse,” in Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 419–48.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J. (1968). “The Case for Case,” in Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1–88.Find this resource:

———. ([1974] 1981). “Pragmatics and the Description of Discourse,” in Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 143–66. [Reprint of Berkeley Studies in Syntax and Semantics, 1974, Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley].Find this resource:

———. (1975). “An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 1: 123–31.Find this resource:

———. (1977 a). “The Case for Case Reopened,” in Peter Cole (ed.), Grammatical Relations. Syntax and Semantics 8. New York: Academic Press, 59–81.Find this resource:

———. (1977 b). “Topics in Lexical Semantics,” in Roger Cole (ed.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 76–138.Find this resource:

———. (1982) “Frame Semantics,” in Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 111–38.Find this resource:

(p. 534) ———. (1985 a). “Syntactic Intrusions and the Notion of Grammatical Construction.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 11: 73–86.Find this resource:

———.. (1985b) “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quadernie di Semantica 6/2: 222–54.Find this resource:

———. (1986). “Varieties of Conditional Sentences,” in Fred Marshall, Ann Miller, and Zheng-Sheng Zhang (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Department of Linguistics, 163–82.Find this resource:

———. (1988). “The Mechanisms of ‘Construction Grammar’.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 14: 35–55.Find this resource:

———. (1989). “Grammatical Construction Theory and the Familiar Dichotomies,” in Rainer Dietrich and Carl F. Graumann (eds.), Language Processing in Social Context. North Holland: Elsevier Publishers, 17–38.Find this resource:

———. (1992). “Corpus Linguistics vs. Computer-aided Armchair Linguistics,” in Jan Svartvik (ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 35–60.Find this resource:

———. (1997). Construction Grammar Lecture Notes. Ms. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/bcg/lec02.html.

———. (1999). “Inversion and Constructional Inheritance,” in Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koenig, and Andras Kathol (eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 113–28.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., and Baker, Colin (2010). “A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis,” in Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 313–40.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., Johnson, Christopher R., and Petruck, Miriam R. L. (2003). “Background to FrameNet.” International Journal of Lexicography 16/3: 235–50.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., and Kay, Paul (1993). “Construction Grammar Coursebook.” Ms. University of California at Berkeley Department of Linguistics.Find this resource:

———. (1995). “Construction Grammar.” Ms., Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

———. (forthcoming). Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul, and O’Connor, Mary C. (1988). “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone.” Language 64/3: 501–38.Find this resource:

Fillmore, Charles J., Lee-Goldman, Russell, and Rhomieux, Russell (2012). “The FrameNet Constructicon,” in Ivan A. Sag and Hans C. Boas (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 283–99.Find this resource:

Finkel, Raphael, and Stump, Gregory S. (2007). “Principal Parts and Morphological Typology.” Morphology 17: 39–75.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Principal Parts and Degrees of Paradigmatic Transparency,” in James P. Blevins and Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–53.Find this resource:

Firbas, Jan (1962). “Notes on the Function of the Sentence in the Act of Communication.” Journal of Studies of the Philosophical Faculty of Brno. Series A 10: 133–48.Find this resource:

———. (1964). “On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis,” in František Daneš (ed.), Travaux de Linguistique de Prague. Vol. 1. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 267–80.Find this resource:

(p. 535) Fischer, Olga (2007). Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fisher, Cynthia, Hall, David G., Rakowitz, Susan, and Gleitman, Lila (1994). “When It Is Better to Receive Than to Give—Syntactic and Conceptual Constraints on Vocabulary Growth.” Lingua 92: 333–75.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerold A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Fodor, Jerold A., and Pylyshyn, Zenon (1988). “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis.” Cognition 28: 3–71.Find this resource:

Forrest, Linda B. (1994). “The De-transitive Clauses in Bella Coola: Passive vs. Inverse,” in Talmy Givón (ed.), Voice and Inversion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 147–68.Find this resource:

Fortuin, Egbert, and Boogaart, Ronny (2009). “Imperative as Conditional: From Constructional to Compositional Semantics.” Cognitive Linguistics 20/4: 641–73.Find this resource:

Fox, Anthony (1995). Linguistic Reconstruction: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Fraser, Bruce. (1970). “Idioms within a Transformational Grammar.” Foundations of Language 6/1: 22–42.Find this resource:

Fried, Mirjam (2003). “Word Order,” in Jan-Ola Östman and Jan Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–13.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “Agent Back-grounding as a Functional Domain: Reflexivization and Passivization in Czech and Russian,” in Benjamin Lyngfelt and Torgrim Solstad (eds.), Demoting the Agent: Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 83–109.Find this resource:

———. (2007a). “A Frame Semantic Account of Morphosemantic Change: The Case of Old Czech věřící,” in Dagmar Divjak and Agata Kochanska (eds.), Cognitive Paths into the Slavic Domain. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 283–315.Find this resource:

———. (2007 b). “Constructing Grammatical Meaning: Isomorphism and Polysemy in Czech Reflexivization.” Studies in Language 31/4: 721–64.Find this resource:

———. (2008).”Constructions and Constructs: Mapping a Shift between Predication and Attribution,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 47–79.Find this resource:

———. (2009a). “Representing Contextual Factors in Language Change: Between Frames and Constructions,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Contexts and Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 63–94.Find this resource:

———. (2009 b). “Construction Grammar as a Tool for Diachronic Analysis.” Constructions and Frames 1/2: 261–91.Find this resource:

———. (2009 c). “Plain vs. Situated Possession in a Network of Grammatical Constructions,” in William McGregor (ed.), Expression of Possession. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 213–48.Find this resource:

———. (2010 a). “Grammaticalization and Lexicalization Effects in Participial Morphology: A Construction Grammar Approach to Language Change,” in An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete, and Kristin Davidse (eds.), Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research. Typological Studies in Language 94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 191–224.Find this resource:

———. (2010 b). “Grammar and Interaction: New Directions in Constructional Research.” Constructions and Frames 2/2: 125–33.Find this resource:

(p. 536) ———. (forthcoming). “Construction Grammar,” in Artemis Alexiadou and Tibor Kiss (eds.), Handbook of Syntax (2nd edn.) Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Fried, Mirjam, and Östman, Jan-Ola (2004 a). “Construction Grammar: A Thumbnail Sketch,” in Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–86.Find this resource:

———. (eds.) (2004 b). Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Construction Grammar and Spoken Language: The Case of Pragmatic Particles.” Journal of Pragmatics 37/11: 1752–78.Find this resource:

Friederici, Angela D. (2002). “Towards a Neural Basis of Auditory Sentence Processing.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6/2: 78–84.Find this resource:

Friederici, Angela D., Pfeifer, Erdmut, and Hahne, Anja (1993). “Event-related Brain Potentials during Natural Speech Processing: Effects of Semantic, Morphological and Syntactic Violations.” Cognitive Brain Research 1/3: 183–92.Find this resource:

Friederici, Angela D., Wang, Yunhua, Herrmann, Christoph S., Maess, Burkhard, and Oertel, Ulrich (2000). “Localization of Early Syntactic Processes in Frontal and Temporal Cortical Areas: A Magnetoencephalographic Study.” Human Brain Mapping 11/1: 1–11.Find this resource:

Fries, Charles C. (1952). The Structure of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Find this resource:

Fries, Charles C., Lado, Robert, and the Staff of the Michigan English Language Institute (1958). English Pattern Practices: Establishing the Patterns as Habits. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Find this resource:

Fujii, Seiko (2004). “Lexically (Un)filled Constructional Schemes and Construction Types: The Case of Japanese Modal Conditional Constructions,” in Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121–56.Find this resource:

Gallese, Vittorio, Faddiga, Luciano, Fogassi, Leonardo, and Rizzolatti, Giacomo (1996). “Action Recognition in the Premotor Cortex.” Brain 119: 593–609.Find this resource:

Garagnani, Max, Shtyrov, Yury, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann (2009). “Effects of Attention on What is Known and What is not: MEG Evidence for Functionally Discrete Memory Circuits.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3/10: 1–12.Find this resource:

Garnsey, Susan M., Pearlmutter, Neal J., Myers, Elizabeth, and Lotocky, Melanie A. (1997). “The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences.” Journal of Memory and Language 37: 58–93.Find this resource:

Garrett, Merrill (1975). “The Analysis of Sentence Production,” in Gordon H. Bower (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press, 133–77.Find this resource:

———. (1980). “Levels of Processing in Sentence Production,” in Brian Butterworth (ed.), Language Production. Vol. 1. London: Academic Press, 177–220.Find this resource:

Gass, Susan, and Selinker, Larry (eds.) (1983). Language Transfer in Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Find this resource:

Gawron, Jean Mark (1986). “Situations and Prepositions.” Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 327–82.Find this resource:

Gazdar, Gerald, Klein, Ewan, Pullum, Geoffrey, and Sag, Ivan A. (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

Geeraerts, Dirk, Grondelaers, Stefan, and Bakema, Peter (1994). The Structure of Lexical Variation: Meaning, Naming and Context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

(p. 537) Geeraerts, Dirk, Grondelaers, Stefan, and Speelman, Dirk (1999). Convergentie en Divergentie in de Nederlandse Woordenschat: Een Onderzoek naar Kleding- en Voetbaltermen. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Find this resource:

Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer (2008). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. 2nd printing with corrections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Gertner, Yael, Fisher, Cynthia, and Eisengart, Julie (2006). “Learning Words and Rules: Abstract Knowledge of Word Order in Early Sentence Comprehension.” Psychological Science 17/8: 684–91.Find this resource:

Ghomeshi, Jila, Jackendoff, Ray, Rosen, Nicole, and Russell, Kevin (2004). “Contrastive Focus Reduplication in English (the salad-salad Paper).” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 307–57.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W., and Nayak, Nandini. (1989). “Psycholinguistic Studies on the Syntactic Behavior of Idioms.” Cognitive Psychology 21/1: 100–38.Find this resource:

Gibbs, Raymond W., Nayak, Nandini, Bolton, John, and Keppel, Melissa (1989). “Speakers’ Assumptions about the Lexical Flexibility of Idioms.” Memory and Cognition 17/1: 58–68.Find this resource:

Gildea, Spike (1997). “Evolution of Grammatical Relations in Cariban: How Functional Motivation Precedes Syntactic Change,” in Talmy Givón (ed.), Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 155–98.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (1998). On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2000). “On the Genesis of the Verb Phrase in Cariban Languages: Diversity through Reanalysis,” in Spike Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65–105.Find this resource:

Giles, Howard, Mulac, Anthony, Bradac, James J., and Johnson, Patricia (1987). “Speech Accommodation Theory: The First Decade and Beyond,” in Margaret L. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication Yearbook 10. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 13–48.Find this resource:

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle (2006). “The Verb Slot in Causative Constructions. Finding the Best Fit.” Constructions SV 1–3/2006. http://www.elanguage.net/journals/index.php/constructions/index.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Gries, Stefan Th. (2009). “Corpora and Experimental Methods: A State-of-the-art Review.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5: 1–26.Find this resource:

Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Sag, Ivan A. (2000). Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Givón, Talmy (1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York and San Francisco: Academic Press.Find this resource:

———. (1991). “Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code: Cognitive and Biological Considerations.” Studies in Language 1: 85–114.Find this resource:

Gleitman, Lila (1994). “The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings,” in Paul Bloom (ed.), Language Acquisition: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 174–221.Find this resource:

Gleitman, Lila, January, David, Nappa, Rebecca, and Trueswell, John (2007). “On the Give and Take between Event Apprehension and Utterance Formulation.” Journal of Memory and Language 57: 544–69.Find this resource:

Glenberg, Arthur M., and Kaschak, Michael P. (2002). “Grounding Language in Action.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9/3: 558–65.Find this resource:

(p. 538) Glenberg, Arthur M., and Robertson, David (2000). “Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning.” Journal of Memory and Language 43/3: 379–401.Find this resource:

Glenberg, Arthur M., Sato, Marc, and Cattaneo, Luigi (2008). “Use-induced Motor Plasticity Affects the Processing of Abstract and Concrete Language.” Current Biology 18/7: R290–91.Find this resource:

Glucksberg, Sam. (1993). “Idiom Meanings and Allusional Content,” in Cristina Cacciari and Patrizia Tabossi (eds.), Idioms: Processing, Structure and Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 3–26.Find this resource:

Goddard, Cliff (2000). “A Problem of Definition,” in Yael Ravin and Claudia Leacock (eds.), Polysemy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129–51.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E. (1989). “A Unified Account of the Semantics of the Ditransitive.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 15: 79–90.Find this resource:

———. (1992). “The Inherent Semantics of Argument Structure: The Case of the English Ditransitive Construction.” Cognitive Linguistics 3: 37–74.Find this resource:

———. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

———. (1996). “Jackendoff and Construction-Based Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 7: 3–20.Find this resource:

———. (1997). “Relationships between Verb and Construction,” in Marjolijn Verspoor and Eve Sweetser (eds.), Lexicon and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 383–98.Find this resource:

———. (1999). “The Emergence of the Semantics of Argument Structure Constructions,” in Brian MacWhinney (ed.), The Emergence of Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 197–212.Find this resource:

———. (2000). “Patient Arguments of Causative Verbs can be Omitted: The Role of Information Structure in Argument Distribution.” Language Sciences 34: 503–24.Find this resource:

———. (2002). “Surface Generalizations: An Alternative to Alternations.” Cognitive Linguistics 13: 327–56.Find this resource:

———. (2003). “Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7/5: 219–24.Find this resource:

———. (2004 a). “Argument Realization: The Role of Constructions, Lexical Semantics and Discourse Factors,” in Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–44.Find this resource:

———. (2004 b). “But do we Need Universal Grammar? Comment on Lidz et al. (2003).” Cognition 94: 77–84.Find this resource:

———. (2006 a). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2006 b). “Learning Linguistic Patterns,” in Arthur Markman and Brian Ross (eds.), Categories in Use. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 47. San Diego: Academic Press/Elsevier, 33–63.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Verbs, Frames and Constructions”. In Malka R. Hovav, Edit Doron, and Ivy Sichel (eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2011 a). “Corpus Evidence of the Viability of Statistical Preemption.” Cognitive Linguistics 22/1: 131–54.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (2011b). Cognitive Linguistics, Vols. I–V. Oxford: Routledge.Find this resource:

(p. 539) Goldberg, Adele E., and Bencini, Giulia (2005). “Support from Processing for a Constructional Approach to Grammar,” in Andrea Tyler, Mari Takada, Yiyoung Kim, and Diana Marinova (eds.), Language in Use: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives on Language and Language Learning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 3–18.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E., and Casenhiser, Devin (2006). “English Constructions,” in Bas Aarts and April McMahon (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 343–55.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E., Casenhiser, Devin, and Sethuraman, Nitya (2004). “Learning Argument Structure Generalizations.” Cognitive Linguistics 15: 289–316.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “The Role of Prediction in Construction-learning.” Journal of Child Language 32: 407–26.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E., and Del Giudice, Alex (2005). “Subject-auxiliary Inversion: A Natural Category.” Linguistic Review 22: 411–28.Find this resource:

Goldberg, Adele E., and Jackendoff, Ray (2004). “The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions.” Language 80: 532–68.Find this resource:

Goldschneider, Jennifer M., and DeKeyser, Robert (2001). “Explaining the ‘Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition’ in English: A Meta-analysis of Multiple Determinants.” Language Learning 51: 1–50.Find this resource:

Goldwater, Micah B., and Markman, Arthur B. (2009). “Constructional Sources of Implicit Agents in Sentence Comprehension.” Cognitive Linguistics 20: 675–702.Find this resource:

González, Julio, Barros-Loscertales, Alfonso, Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Meseguer, Vanessa, Sanjuán, Ana, Belloch, Vicente, and Ávila, César (2006). “Reading Cinnamon Activates Olfactory Brain Regions.” Neuroimage 32/2: 906–12.Find this resource:

Gonzalez-Marquez, Mónica, Mittleberg, Irene, Coulson, Seana, and Spivey, Michael (eds.) (2007). Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco (2006). “Passives Without Actives: Evidence from Verbless Complement Clauses in Spanish.” Constructions SV1–5/2006. http://www.elanguage.net/journals/index.php/constructions/index.

———. (2010). “Contrasting Constructions in English and Spanish: The Influence of Semantic, Pragmatic and Discourse factors,” in Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43–86.Find this resource:

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco, and Butler, Chris (2006). “Mapping Cognitive-functional Space.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4: 39–96.Find this resource:

Goschler, Juliana, and Stefanowitsch, Anatol (2010). “Pfad und Bewegung im Gesprochenen Deutsch: Ein Kollostruktionaler Ansatz,” in Thomas Stolz, Esther Ruigendijk, and Jürgen Trabant (eds.), Linguistik im Nordwesten. Bochum: Brockmeyer, 103–15.Find this resource:

Granger, Sylvianne, and Meunier, Fanny (eds.) (2008). Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Gras, Pedro (2010). “Non Prototypical Sentence-level Constructions: Construction Grammar Meets Insubordination.” Talk given at the 6th International Conference of Construction Grammar ICCG6, Charles University, Prague, September 3–5, 2010.Find this resource:

Green, Georgia M. (1974). Semantics and Syntactic Regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Find this resource:

Greenberg, Joseph H. (1990). “Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements,” in Keith Denning and Suzanne (p. 540) Kemmer (eds.), On Language: Selected Writings of Joseph H. Greenberg. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 40–70.Find this resource:

Grewe, Tanja, Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Wiese, Richard, von Cramon, D. Yves, and Schlesewsky, Matthias (2006). “Linguistic Prominence and Broca's Area: The Influence of Animacy as a Linearization Principle.” Neuroimage 32/3: 1395–402.Find this resource:

Gries, Stefan Th. (1999). “Particle Movement: A Cognitive and Functional approach.” Cognitive Linguistics 10: 105–45.Find this resource:

———. (2001). “A Multifactorial Analysis of Syntactic Variation: Particle Movement Revisited.” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 8: 33–50.Find this resource:

———. (2002). “The Influence of Processing on Grammatical Variation: Particle Placement in English,” in Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre, and Silke Urban (eds.), Verb-particle Explorations. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 269–88.Find this resource:

———. (2003 a). Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London and New York: Continuum Press.Find this resource:

———. (2003 b). “Towards a Corpus-based Identification of Prototypical Instances of Constructions.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1: 1–27.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34/4: 365–99.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Coll.analysis 3.2a. R Script to Compute Collostructional Strengths.” http://tinyurl.com/collostructions.

Gries, Stefan Th., Hampe, Beate, and Schönefeld, Doris (2005). “Converging Evidence: Bringing Together Experimental and Corpus Data on the Association of Verbs and Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 16/4: 635–76.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Converging Evidence II: More on the Association of Verbs and Constructions,” in John Newman and Sally Rice (eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 59–72.Find this resource:

Gries, Stefan Th., and Hilpert, Martin (2008). “The Identification of Stages in Diachronic Data: Variability-based Neighbour Clustering.” Corpora 3/1: 59–81.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Modeling Diachronic Change in the Third Person Singular: A Multifactorial, Verb- and Author-specific Exploratory Approach.” English Language and Linguistics 14/3: 293–320.Find this resource:

Gries, Stefan Th., and Stefanowitsch, Anatol (2004 a). “Extending Collostructional Analysis: A Corpus-based Perspective on ‘Alternations’.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9/1: 97–129.Find this resource:

———. (2004 b). “Co-varying Collexemes in the Into-causative,” in Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, Culture and Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 225–36.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Cluster Analysis and the Identification of Collexeme Classes,” in John Newman and Sally Rice (eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 73–90.Find this resource:

Gries, Stefan Th., and Wulff, Stefanie (2005). “Do Foreign Language Learners Also Have Constructions? Evidence from Priming, Sorting and Corpora.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 182–200.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Psycholinguistic and Corpus-linguistic Evidence for L2 constructions.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7/1: 163–86.Find this resource:

Grimshaw, Jane. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Find this resource:

Grodzinsky, Yosef, and Friederici, Angela D. (2006). “Neuroimaging of Syntax and Syntactic Processing.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16/2: 240–46.Find this resource:

(p. 541) Grondelaers, Stefan (2000). “De Distributie van Niet Anaforisch er Buiten de Eerste Zinplaats: Sociolexicologische, Functionele en Psycholinguïstische Aspected van er's Status als Presentatief Signaal.” Ph.D. dissertation, Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Find this resource:

Grondelaers, Stefan, van Aken, Hilde, Speelman, Dirk, and Geeraerts, Dirk (2001). “Inhoudswoorden en Preposities als Standaardiserings-indicatoren. De Diachrone em Synchrone Status van het Belgische Nederlands.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 6: 179–202.Find this resource:

Grondelaers, Stefan, and Brysbaert, Marc (1996). “De Distributie van het Presentatieve er Buiten de Eerste Zinsplaats.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 1: 280–305.Find this resource:

Grondelaers, Stefan, Speelman, Dirk, and Geeraerts, Dirk (2007). “A Case for a Cognitive Corpus Linguistics,” in Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson, and Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 149–69.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “National Variation in the Use of er ‘there’. Regional and Diachronic Constraints on Cognitive Explanations,” in Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 153–203.Find this resource:

Gundel, Jeanette, and Fretheim, Thorstein (2009). “Information Structure,” in Frank Brisard, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verscheuren (eds.), Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 146–60.Find this resource:

Günthner, Susanne (2008). “Die ‘die Sache/das Ding ist’-Konstruktion im Gesprochenen Deutsch—eine Interaktionale Perspektive auf Konstruktionen im Gebrauch,” in Anatol Stefanowitsch and Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik II—Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 157–78.Find this resource:

Günthner, Susanne, and Imo, Wolfgang (eds.) (2007). Konstruktionen in der Interaktion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Gurevich, Olga (2006). “Constructional Morphology: The Georgian Version.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Find this resource:

Gurevich, Olga, Johnson, Matt and Goldberg, Adele E. (2010). “Incidental Verbatim Memory for Language”. Language and Cognition 2/1: 45–78.Find this resource:

Guy, Gregory R., and Bayley, Robert (1995). “On the Choice of Relative Pronouns in English.” American Speech 70: 148–62.Find this resource:

Haberzettl, Stefanie (2007). “Konstruktionen im Zweitspracherwerb,” in Kerstin Fischer and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 55–78.Find this resource:

Haegeman, Liliane. (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Find this resource:

Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, de Rooij, Jaap, and van der Toorn, Maarten C. (1977). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (2nd edn.). Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff Uitgevers/Wolters Plantyn.Find this resource:

Hagoort, Peter (2005). “On Broca, Brain and Binding: A New Framework.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9/9: 416–23.Find this resource:

Hagoort, Peter, Brown, Colin, and Groothusen, Jolanda (1993). “The Syntactic Positive Shift (SPS) as an ERP-Measure of Syntactic Processing.” Language and Cognitive Processes 8/4: 439–83.Find this resource:

Haiman, John. (1980). “Dictionaries and Encyclopedias.” Lingua 50: 329–57.Find this resource:

———. (1983). “Iconic and Economic Motivation.” Language 59: 781–819.Find this resource:

———. (1985 a). Iconicity in Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

(p. 542) ———. (1985 b). Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hakuta, Kenji (1974). “Prefabricated Patterns and the Emergence of Structure in Second Language Acquisition.” Language Learning 24: 287–98.Find this resource:

Hale, Ken, and Keyser, Jay (1997). “On the Complex Nature of Simple Predicators,” in Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan, and Peter Sells (eds.), Complex Predicates. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 29–65.Find this resource:

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2.” Journal of Linguistics 3: 199–244.Find this resource:

Hampe, Beate, and Schönefeld, Doris (2006). “Syntactic Leaps or Lexical Variation?—More on ‘Creative Syntax’,” in Stefan Th. Gries and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 127–58.Find this resource:

Happé, Francesca (1994). Autism: An Introduction to Psychological Theory. London: UCL Press.Find this resource:

Hare, Mary L., and Goldberg, Adele E. (1999). “Structural Priming: Purely Syntactic?” in Martin Hahn and Scott C. Stones (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 208–11.Find this resource:

Hare, Mary L., McRae, Ken, and Elman, Jeffrey L. (2003). “Sense and Structure: Meaning as a Determinant of Verb Subcategorization Preferences.” Journal of Memory and Language 48: 281–303.Find this resource:

Harley, Trevor (2001). The Psychology of Language: From Data to Theory (2nd edn.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Find this resource:

Harris, Alice C. (2003). “Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Syntactic Change,” in Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 529–51.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Reconstruction in Syntax: Reconstruction of Patterns,” in Gisella Ferraresi and Maria Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73–95.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Exuberant Exponence in Batsbi.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 267–303.Find this resource:

Harris, Alice C., and Campbell, Lyle (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Harrison, S. P. (2003). “On the Limits of the Comparative Method,” in Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 343–68.Find this resource:

Hasegawa, Yoko, Lee-Goldman, Russell, Ohara Hirose, Kyoko, Fujii, Seiko, and Fillmore, Charles J. (2010). “On Expressing Measurement and Comparison in English and Japanese,” in Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 169–200.Find this resource:

Haspelmath, Martin (1997). Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2003). “The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning: Semantic Maps and Cross-linguistic Comparison,” in Michael Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language. Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 211–42.Find this resource:

———. (2004). “Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description?” Studies in Language 28/3: 554–79.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “Explaining Alienability Contrasts in Adnominal Possession: Economy vs. Iconicity.” Paper presented at the 2nd Conference on the Syntax of (p. 543) the World's Languages, Lancaster University. Handout available http://email.eva.mpg.de/~haspelmt/2006swl.pdf, accessed March 12, 2010.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Pre-established Categories Don’t Exist: Consequences for Language Description and Typology.” Linguistic Typology 11: 119–32.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Parametric versus Functional Explanation of Syntactic Universals,” in Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 75–107.Find this resource:

———. (2010 a). “Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies.” Language 86/3: 663–87.Find this resource:

———. (2010 b). “Framework-free Grammatical Theory,” in Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 341–65.Find this resource:

———. (2011). “The Indeterminacy of Word Segmentation and the Nature of Morphology and Syntax.” Folia Linguistica 45: 31–80.Find this resource:

Hauser, Mark D., Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh (2002). “The Faculty of Language: What is it, Who has it and How did it Evolve?” Science 298: 1569–79.Find this resource:

Hawkins, John A. (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1999). “Processing Complexity and Filler-gap Dependencies across Grammars.” Language 75: 245–85.Find this resource:

———. (2004). Efficiency and Complexity of Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Hay, Jennifer (2001). “Lexical Frequency in Morphology: Is Everything Relative?” Linguistics 39: 1041–70.Find this resource:

Hay, Jennifer, and Baayen, R. Harald (2005). “Shifting Paradigms: Gradient Structure in Morphology.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 342–48.Find this resource:

Hay, Jennifer, and Bresnan, Joan (2006). “Spoken Syntax: The Phonetics of Giving a Hand in New Zealand English.” Linguistic Review 23: 321–49.Find this resource:

Hayon, Gaby, Abeles, Moshe, and Lehmann, Daniel (2005). “A Model for Representing the Dynamics of a System of Synfire Chains.” Journal of Computational Neuroscience 18/1: 41–53.Find this resource:

Heath, Jeffrey (1977). “Choctaw Cases.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 3: 204–13.Find this resource:

Heine, Bernd (1992). “Grammaticalization Chains.” Studies in Language 16: 335–68.Find this resource:

Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, and Hünnemeyer, Friederieke (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Heine, Bernd, and Kuteva, Tania (2002). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Helbig, Gerhard (1992). Probleme der Valenz- und Kasustheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Find this resource:

Helbig, Gerhard, and Schenkel, Wolfgang (1971). Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution Deutscher Verben (2nd edn.). Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.Find this resource:

HELSINKI (The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts/now part of the PPCME/PPCEME corpora). http://khnt.aksis.uib.no/icame/manuals/HC/INDEX.HTM.

Herbst, Thomas, and Kötz-Votteler, Karin (2007). Valency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Hewson, John, and Bubenik, Vit (2006). From Case to Adposition: The Development of Configurational Syntax in Indo-European Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

(p. 544) Heylen, Kris, Tummers, José, and Geeraerts, Dirk (2008). “Methodological Issues in Corpus-based Cognitive Linguistics,” in Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 91–128.Find this resource:

Hickok, Gregory, and Poeppel, David (2000). “Towards a Functional Neuroanatomy of Speech Perception.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4/4: 131–38.Find this resource:

Hillis, Argie, and Caramazza, Alfonso (1995). “Representation of Grammatical Knowledge in the Brain.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7: 396–407.Find this resource:

Hilpert, Martin (2006 a). “Distinctive Collexeme Analysis and Diachrony.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2/2: 243–57.Find this resource:

———. (2006 b). “A Synchronic Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Swedish Future Constructions.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 29: 151–72.Find this resource:

———. (2008). Germanic Future Constructions. A Usage-based Approach to Language Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “The German mit-predicative Construction.” Constructions and Frames 1: 29–55.Find this resource:

Hilpert, Martin, and Gries, Stefan Th. (2009). “Assessing Frequency Changes in Multi-stage Diachronic Corpora: Applications for Historical Corpus Linguistics and the Study of Language Acquisition.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 24/4: 385–401.Find this resource:

Hilpert, Martin, and Koops, Christian (2008). “A Quantitative Approach to the Development of Complex Predicates: The Case of Swedish Pseudo-Coordination with sitta ‘sit’.” Diachronica 25/2: 242–61.Find this resource:

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (2004). “Lexicalization or Grammaticization: Opposite or Orthogonal?” in Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, and Björn Wiemer (eds.), What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 21–42.Find this resource:

Höche, Silke (2009). “A Corpus-based Investigation of Cognate Object Constructions,” in Ute Römer and Rainer Schulze (eds.), Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–209.Find this resource:

Hoenigswald, Henry M. (1987). “The Annus Mirabilis 1876 and Posterity.” Transactions of the Philological Society 76/1: 17–35.Find this resource:

Hoffmann, Sebastian (2004). “Are Low-frequency Complex Prepositions Grammaticalized? On the Limits of Corpus Data—and the Importance of Intuition,” in Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 171–210.Find this resource:

———. (2005). Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions: A Corpus-Based Study. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Hoffmann, Thomas (2006). “Corpora and Introspection as Corroborating Evidence: The Case of Preposition Placement in English Relative Clauses.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2: 165–95.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “English Relative Clauses and Construction Grammar: A Topic which Preposition Placement can Shed Light on?” in Graeme Trousdale and Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional Approaches to English Grammar. Topics in English Linguistics 57. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–112.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “The More Data, the Better: A Usage-based Account of the English Comparative Correlative Construction.” Talk given at the 6th International Conference of Construction Grammar ICCG6, Charles University, Prague, September 3–5, 2010.Find this resource:

(p. 545) ———. (2011). Preposition Placement in English: A Usage-based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hoffmann, Thomas, and Trousdale, Graeme (2011). “Variation, Change and Constructions in English.” Cognitive Linguistics 22/1: 1–24.Find this resource:

Hofmeister, Philip, and Sag, Ivan (2010). “Cognitive Constraints and Island Effects.” Language 86: 366–415.Find this resource:

Hollmann, Willem (2007). “From Language-specific Constraints to Implicational Universals: A Cognitive-typological View of the Dative Alternation.” Functions of Language 14: 57–78.Find this resource:

———. (forthcoming). “Word Classes: Towards a More Comprehensive Usage-based Account.” Studies in Language.Find this resource:

Hollmann, Willem, and Siewierska, Anna (2006). “Corpora and (the Need for) other Methods in a Study of Lancashire Dialect.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik and Amerikanistik 54: 203–16.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “A Construction Grammar Account of Possessive Constructions in Lancashire Dialect: Some Advantages and Challenges.” English Language and Linguistics 11: 407–24.Find this resource:

———. (2011). “The Status of Frequency, Schemas and Identity in Cognitive Sociolinguistics: A Case Study on Definite Article Reduction.” Cognitive Linguistics 22: 25–54.Find this resource:

Holme, Randal (2009). Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

Holmes, Jasper, and Hudson, Richard (2005). “Constructions in Word Grammar,” in Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 253–72.Find this resource:

Honeybone, Patrick (2011). “Variation and Linguistic Theory,” in Warren Maguire and April McMahon (eds.), Analyzing Variation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–77.Find this resource:

Hook, Peter Edwin, and Chauhan, Mohabhat Singh Man Singh (1988). “The Perfective Adverb in Bhitrauti.” Word 39: 177–86.Find this resource:

Hopper, Paul J. (1987). “Emergent Grammar.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–57.Find this resource:

———. (1991). “On Some Principles of Grammaticalization,” in Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–35.Find this resource:

———. (1998). “Emergent Grammar,” in Michael Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 155–76.Find this resource:

Hopper, Paul J., and Thompson, Sandra A. (1980). “Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse.” Language 56: 251–99.Find this resource:

———. (1984). “The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar.” Language 60: 703–52.Find this resource:

Hopper, Paul J., and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Hostetter, Autumn B., and Alibali, Martha W. (2008). “Visible Embodiment: Gestures as Simulated Action.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15/3: 495–514.Find this resource:

Hovav, Malka Rappaport, and Levin, Beth (1998). “Building Verb Meaning,” in Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The Projection of Arguments, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 97–134.Find this resource:

———. (2001). “An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives.” Language 77: 766–97.Find this resource:

(p. 546) ———. (2005). “Are Dative Verbs Polysemous?” Paper Presented to the Linguistics Colloquium, Princeton University, February 17, 2005.Find this resource:

Hubel, David H. (1995). Eye, Brain and Vision. Scientific American Library No. 22. New York: WH Freeman.Find this resource:

Hudson, Richard A. (1990). English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

———. (1996). Sociolinguistics (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1997). “Inherent Variability.” Cognitive Linguistics 8: 73–108.Find this resource:

———. (2000). English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

———. (2007 a). “English Dialect Syntax in Word Grammar.” English Language and Linguistics 11: 383–405.Find this resource:

———. (2007 b). Language Networks: The New Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2007 c). “Inherent Variability and Modularity: A Comment on Adger's ‘Combinatorial Variability’.” Journal of Linguistics 43: 683–94.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Word Grammar and Construction Grammar,” in Graeme Trousdale and Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional Approaches to English Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 257–302.Find this resource:

Hughes, Arthur, and Trudgill, Peter (1996). English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles (3rd edn.). London: Arnold.Find this resource:

Hulstijn, Jan, and DeKeyser, Robert (eds.) (1997). “Testing SLA Theory in the Research Laboratory.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19/2 (special issue).Find this resource:

Humboldt, Wilhelm von (1825). Űber das Entstehen der Grammatikalischen Formen und ihren Einfluβauf die Ideenentwicklung. Abhandlungen der Kőniglichen Akademie der Wisseschaften zu Berlin, 401–30.Find this resource:

Hundt, Marianne (2004). “The Passival and the Progressive Passive—a Case Study of Layering in the English Aspect and Voice Systems,” in Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalisation in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–120.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “ The committee has/have decided… On Concord Patterns with Collective Nouns in Inner and Outer Circle Varieties of English.” Journal of English Linguistics 34: 206–32.Find this resource:

Hunston, Susan, and Francis, Gillian (1996). Pattern Grammar: A Corpus Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

———. (1999). Pattern Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Huttenlocher, Janellen, Vasilyeva, Marina, and Shimpi, Priya (2004). “Syntactic Priming in Young Children.” Journal of Memory and Language 50: 182–95.Find this resource:

Hymes, Dell (1962). “The Ethnography of Speaking,” in Thomas Gladwin and William C. Sturtevant (eds.), Anthropology and Human Behavior. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington, 13–53.Find this resource:

Ibbotson, Paul, Theakston, Anna L., Lieven, Elena V. M., and Tomasello, Michael (2012). “Semantics of the Transitive Construction: Prototype Effects and Developmental Comparisons.” Cognitive Science 36: 1–21.Find this resource:

IDS (Various German Corpora). http://www.ids-mannheim.de/cosmas2/.

Israel, Michael (1996). “The Way Constructions Grow,” in Adele Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 217–30.Find this resource:

Iwata, Seizi (2006). “Argument Resultatives and Adjunct Resulatives in a Lexical Constructional Account: The Case of Resultatives with Adjectival Result Phrases.” Language Sciences 28: 449–96.Find this resource:

(p. 547) ———. (2008). Locative Alternation: A Lexical-constructional Approach. Constructional Approaches to Language 6. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray (1975). “Semantic and Morphological Regularities in the Lexicon.” Language 51: 639–71.Find this resource:

———. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (1984). “On the Phrase the phrase ‘the phrase.’” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 25–37.Find this resource:

———. (1987). “On Beyond Zebra: The Relation of Linguistic and Visual Information.” Cognition 26: 89–114.Find this resource:

———. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (1991). “Mme. Tussaud Meets the Binding Theory.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 1–31.Find this resource:

———. (1997 a). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (1997 b). “Twistin’ the Night Away.” Language 73: 532–59.Find this resource:

———. (2002 a). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2002 b). “English Particle Constructions, the Lexicon and the Autonomy of Syntax,” in Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre, and Silke Urban (eds.), Verb-Particle Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 67–94.Find this resource:

———. (2004). “Categorization, Fuzziness and Family Resemblances,” in Bas Aarts, David Denison, Evelien Keizer, and Gergana Popova (eds.), Fuzzy Grammar: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–29.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The State of the Art.” Linguistic Review 24: 347–401.Find this resource:

———. (2008 a). “Alternative Minimalist Visions of Language.” Chicago Linguistic Society 41 (The panels): 189–226.Find this resource:

———. (2008 b). “Construction after Construction and its Theoretical Challenges.” Language 84: 8–28.Find this resource:

———. (2010). Meaning and the Lexicon: The Parallel Architecture 1975–2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2011). “What is the Human Language Faculty? Two Views.” Language 87/3: 586–624.Find this resource:

Jackendoff, Ray, and Pinker, Steven (2005). “The Nature of the Language Faculty and its Implications for Evolution of Language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser and Chomsky).” Cognition 97/2: 211–25.Find this resource:

Jakobson, Roman (1971). “Shifters, Verbal Categories and the Russian Verb,” reprinted in Roman Jakobson, Selected Writings II. Mouton: The Hague, 130–47.Find this resource:

James, Carl (1980). Contrastive Analysis. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Janda, Richard D., and Joseph, Brian D. (2003). “Introduction: On Language, Change and Language Change—or, of History, Linguistics and Historical Linguistics,” in Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 3–180.Find this resource:

Janicki, Karol (2008). “How Cognitive Linguists can Help Solve Political Problems,” in Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 517–42.Find this resource:

Janssen, Niels, and Caramazza, Alfonso (2009). “Grammatical and Phonological Influences on Word Order.” Psychological Science 20: 1262–68.Find this resource:

Jeffers, Robert J. (1976). “Syntactic Change and Syntactic Reconstruction,” in William M. Christie, Jr. (ed.), Current Progress in Historical Linguistics: Proceedings of the (p. 548) Second International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1–15.Find this resource:

Johnson, Marc (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Johnson, Matthew A., and Goldberg, Adele E. (2012). “Evidence for Automatic Accessing of Constructional Meaning: Jabberwocky sentences prime associated verbs.” Language and Cognitive Processes: 1–14.Find this resource:

Johnstone, Barbara, and Kiesling, Scott E. (2008). “Indexicality and Experience: Exploring the Meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12: 5–33.Find this resource:

Jones, Mark (1999). “The Phonology of Definite Article Reduction.” Leeds Studies in English 30: 103–21.Find this resource:

———. (2002). “The Origin of Definite Article Reduction in Northern English Dialects: Evidence from Dialect Allomorphy.” English Language and Linguistics 6: 325–45.Find this resource:

Jurafsky, Daniel (1992). “An On-line Computational Model of Human Sentence Interpretation,” in American Association for Artificial Intelligence (eds.), Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-92), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 302–8.Find this resource:

Just, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A., Keller, Timothy A., Eddy, William F., and Thulborn, Keith R. (1996). “Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension.” Science 274/5284: 114–16.Find this resource:

Justeson, John S., and Katz, Slava M. (1991). “Co-occurrences of Antonymous Adjectives and their Contexts.” Computational Linguistics 17/1: 1–19.Find this resource:

———. (1995). “Technical Terminology: Some Linguistic Properties and an Algorithm for Identification in Text.” Natural Language Engineering 1: 9–27.Find this resource:

Kageyama, Taro (1982). “Word Formation in Japanese.” Lingua 57: 215–58.Find this resource:

———. (1999). “Word Formation,” in Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 297–325.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Isolate: Japanese,” in Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 512–26.Find this resource:

Kaschak, Michael P., and Glenberg, Arthur M. (2000). “Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical Constructions in Sentence Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 43: 508–29.Find this resource:

Kathol, Andreas (1999). “Agreement and the Syntax-morphology Interface in HPSG,” in Robert Levine and Georgia Green (eds.), Studies in Current Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 223–74.Find this resource:

Katis, Demetra, and Stampouliadou, Chrysoula (2009). “The Development of Sentential Complement Constructions in Greek: Evidence from a Case Study.” Constructions and Frames 1/2: 222–61.Find this resource:

Kay, Martin (1986). “Parsing in Functional Unification Grammar,” in Barbara Grosz, Karin Spark Jones, and Barbara Webber (eds.), Readings in Natural Language Processing. Los Angeles: Morgan Kaufmann, 251–78.Find this resource:

Kay, Paul (1990). “EVEN.” Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 59–111.Find this resource:

———. (1996). “Argument Structure: Causative ABC-Constructions.” Ms. University of California at Berkeley.Find this resource:

———. (2000). “Comprehension Deficits of Broca's Aphasics Provide no Evidence for Traces.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23/1: 37–38.Find this resource:

———. (2002 a). “English Subjectless Tagged Sentences.” Language 78: 453–81.Find this resource:

(p. 549) ———. (2002 b). “An Informal Sketch of a Formal Architecture for Construction Grammar.” Grammars 5: 1–19.Find this resource:

———. (2004 a). “Pragmatic Aspects of Constructions,” in Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 675–700.Find this resource:

———. (2004 b). “Null Complementation Constructions.” Ms., University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Argument Structure Constructions and the Argument-adjunct Distinction,” in Mirjam Fried and Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 71–100.Find this resource:

Kay, Paul, and Fillmore, Charles J. (1999). “Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What's X Doing Y? Construction.” Language 75: 1–34.Find this resource:

Kay, Paul, and Michaelis, Laura A. (forthcoming). “Constructions and Compositionality,” in Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. HSK Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science Series, 23: Semantics and Computer Science. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Kay, Paul, and Sag, Ivan A. (2009). “How Hard a Problem Would This be to Solve?” in Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG09 Conference. Department of Linguistics, Stanford University. CSLI Publications, 171–91. http://csli-publications.stanford.edu.Find this resource:

———. (2012). “Discontinuous Dependencies and Complex Determiners,” in Hans C. Boas and Ivan. A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 217–46.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward L. (2003). “An Historical Explanation of Some Binding Theoretic Facts in English,” in John Moore and Maria Polinsky (eds.), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 153–89.Find this resource:

Keenan, Edward L., and Comrie, Bernard (1977). “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Find this resource:

———. (1979). “Data on the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy.” Language 55: 333–51.Find this resource:

Keller, Frank (2000). “Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and ComputationalAspects of Degrees of Grammaticality.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Edinburgh.Find this resource:

Keller, Rudi (1994). On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Kemmer, Suzanne (1993). The Middle Voice. Typological Studies in Language 23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Kemmer, Suzanne, and Barlow, Michael (2000). “Introduction: A Usage-based Conception of Language,” in Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, vii–xxviii.Find this resource:

Kemmer, Suzanne, and Verhagen, Arie (1994). “The Grammar of Causatives and the Conceptual Structure of Events.” Cognitive Linguistics 5: 115–56.Find this resource:

Kempen, Gerard, and Harbusch, Karin (2003). “Word Order Scrambling as a Consequence of Incremental Sentence Production,” in Holden Härtl and Heike Tappe (eds.), Mediating between Concepts and Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 141–64.Find this resource:

Kempen, Gerard, and Huijbers, Pieter (1983). “The Lexicalization Process in Sentence Production and Naming: Indirect Elicitation of Words.” Cognition 14: 185–209.Find this resource:

Kerswill, Paul, and Williams, Ann (2002). “‘Salience’ as an Explanatory Factor in Language Change: Evidence from Dialect Levelling in Urban England,” in Mari C. (p. 550) Jones and Edith Esch (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 81–110.Find this resource:

Kidd, Evan, Lieven, Elena V. M., and Tomasello, Michael (2010). “Lexical Frequency and Exemplar-based Learning Effects in Language Acquisition: Evidence from Sentential Complements.” Language Sciences 32: 132–42.Find this resource:

Kiefer, Ferenc, and Honti, László(2003). “Verbal ‘Prefixation’ in the Uralic Languages.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50: 137–53.Find this resource:

Kiefer, Markus, Sim, Eun-Jin., Herrnberger, Bärberl, Grothe, Jo, and Hoenig, Klaus (2008). “The Sound of Concepts: Four Markers for a Link between Auditory and Conceptual Brain Systems.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 28/47: 12224–30.Find this resource:

Kikusawa, Ritsuko (2003). “The Development of Some Indonesian Pronominal Systems,” in Barry J. Blake, Kate Burridge, and Jo Taylor (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 237–68.Find this resource:

Kikuta, Chiharu Uda (1998). “A Multiple Inheritance Analysis of the Internally-Headed Relative Clause in Japanese.” Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC12), 18–20 Feb, 1998, 82–93.Find this resource:

———. (2002). “Clausal Complement or Adverbial Clause?: Toward an Integral Account of the Japanese Internally-Headed Relative Clauses,” in Frank van Eynde, Lars Hellan, and Dorothee Beermann (eds.), Proceedings of the 8 th International HPSG Conference, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. CSLI Publications. http://csli-publications.stanford.edu.Find this resource:

Kinno, Ryuta, Kawamura, Mitsuru, Shioda, Seiji, and Sakai, Kuniyoshi L. (2008). “Neural Correlates of Noncanonical Syntactic Processing Revealed by a Picture-sentence Matching Task.” Human Brain Mapping 29/9: 1015–27.Find this resource:

Kiparsky, Paul, and Kiparsky, Carol (1971). “Fact,” in Danny D. Steinberg and Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 345–69.Find this resource:

Kirk, John (1985). “Linguistic Atlases and Grammar: The Investigation and Description of Regional Variation in English Syntax,” in John Kirk, Stewart Sanderson, and John D. A. Widdowson (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Geography. London: Croom Helm, 130–56.Find this resource:

Klein, Jared S. (2010). “Review of Principles of Reconstruction, ed. by Gisela Ferraresi and Maria Goldbach (2008).” Language 86: 720–26.Find this resource:

Klima, Edward S., and Bellugi, Ursula (1966). “Syntactic Regularities in the Speech of Children,” in John Lyons and Richard J. Wales (eds.), Psycholinguistic Papers. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 183–208.Find this resource:

Kluender, Robert (1992). “Deriving Island Constraints from Principles of Predication,” in Helen Goodluck and Michael Rochemont (eds.), Island Constraints: Theory, Acquisition and Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 241–79.Find this resource:

———. (1998). “On the Distinction between Strong and Weak islands: A Processing Perspective.” Syntax and Semantics 29: 241–79.Find this resource:

Kluge, Friedrich (2002). Etymologisches Wörterbuch der Deutschen Sprache (24th edn.). Berlin: Gruyter.Find this resource:

Knight, Robert T. (2007). “Neuroscience: Neural Networks Debunk Phrenology.” Science 316/5831: 1578–79.Find this resource:

Knoblauch, Andreas, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann (2005). “Sequence Detector Networks and Associative Learning of Grammatical Categories,” in Stefan (p. 551) Wermter, Günther Palm, and Mark Elshaw (eds.), Biomimetic Neural Learning for Intelligent Robots. Berlin: Springer, 31–53.Find this resource:

Kolehmainen, Leena, and Larjavaara, Meri (2004). “The ‘Bizarre’ Valency Behaviour of Finnish Verbs: How a Specific Context Gives Rise to Valency Alternation Patterns.” Constructions 1/2004. http://www.elanguage.net/journals/index.php/constructions/index.

Koller, Veronika (2008). “Corporate Brands as Socio-cognitive Representations,” in Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 389–418.Find this resource:

Konopka, Agnieszka E., and Bock, Kathryn (2008). “Lexical or Syntactic Control of Sentence Formulation? Structural Generalizations from Idiom Production.” Cognitive Psychology 58: 68–101.Find this resource:

Koopman, Willem F., and van der Wurff, Wim (2000). “Two Word Order Patterns in the History of English: Stability, Variation and Change,” in Rosanna Sornicola, Erich Poppe, and Ariel Shisha-Halevy (eds.), Stability, Variation and Change in Word Order Patterns over Time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 259–84.Find this resource:

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (1993). Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Kosslyn, Stephen M., Ganis, Giorgio, and Thompson, William L. (2001). “Neural Foundations of Imagery.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2: 635–42.Find this resource:

Kristiansen, Gitte, and Dirven, René (2008). “Introduction. Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Rationale, Methods and Scope,” in Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–17.Find this resource:

Kruschke, John K., and Johansen, Mark K. (1999). “A Model of Probabilistic Category Learning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25/5: 1083–119.Find this resource:

Kuningas, Johanna (2007). Structure Informationelle et Constructions du Kabyle: Etude de Trois Types de Phrase dans le Cadre de la Grammaire Constructionelle. Publications, vol. 42. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Department of General Linguistics.Find this resource:

Kuningas, Johanna, and Leino, Jaakko (2006). “Word Orders and Construction Grammars,” in Mickael Suominen, Antti Arppe, Anu Airola, Orvokki Heinämäki, Matti Miestamo, Urho Määttä, Jussi Niemi, Kari K. Pitkänen, and Kaius Sinnemäki (eds.), A Man of Measure: Festschrift in Honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th Birthday. A special supplement to SKY Journal of Linguistics 19: 301–9.Find this resource:

Kuperberg, Gina R. (2007). “Neural Mechanisms of Language Comprehension: Challenges to Syntax.” Brain Research 1146: 23–49.Find this resource:

Kutas, Marta, and Hillyard, Steven A. (1984). “Brain Potentials during Reading Reflect Word Expectancy and Semantic Association.” Nature 307: 161–63.Find this resource:

Labov, William (1963). “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change.” Word 19: 273–309.Find this resource:

———. (1969). “Contraction, Deletion and Inherent Variability of the English Copula.” Language 45: 715–62.Find this resource:

———. (1972a). Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Find this resource:

———. (1972b). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Find this resource:

(p. 552) ———. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Find this resource:

———. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

———. (2010). Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Lado, Robert (1957). Linguistics Across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Find this resource:

———. (1964). Language Teaching: A Scientific Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George (1970). Irregularity in Syntax. New York,: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Find this resource:

———. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1990). “The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-schemas?” Cognitive Linguistics 1: 39–74.Find this resource:

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark H. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

———. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. London: Harper Collins.Find this resource:

Lambrecht, Knud (1981). Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-standard French. Pragmatics and Beyond II 6. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

———. (1984). “Formulaicity, Frame Semantics and Pragmatics in German Binominal Expressions.” Language 60/3: 753–96.Find this resource:

———. (1987). “Sentence Focus, Information Structure and the Thetic–categorial Distinction.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 366–82.Find this resource:

———. (1988). “There Was a Farmer Had a Dog: Syntactic Amalgams Revisited.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 14: 319–39.Find this resource:

———. (1990). “‘What me Worry?’ Mad Magazine Sentences Revisited.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 16: 215–28.Find this resource:

———. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1997). “French Relative Clauses as Secondary Predicates,” in Ralph C. Blight and Michelle J. Moosally (eds.), The Syntax and Semantics of Predication. Proceedings of the 1997 Texas Linguistics Society Conference. Austin, Texas: Department of Linguistics, UT Austin, 205–21.Find this resource:

———. (2000). “Prédication Seconde et Structure Informationnelle: La Relative de Perception comme Construction Présentative.” Langue Française 127: 49–66.Find this resource:

———. (2001). “Dislocation,” in Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1056–78.Find this resource:

———. (2002). “Topic, Focus and Secondary Predication: The French Presentational Relative Construction,” in Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen, and Paola Monachesi (eds.), Proceedings of Going Romance 2000. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 171–212.Find this resource:

———. (2004). “On the Interaction of Information Structure and Formal Structure in Constructions: The Case of French Right-detached comme-N,” in Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective. Constructional Approaches to Language 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 157–99.Find this resource:

(p. 553) Lambrecht, Knud, and Lemoine, Kevin (2005). “Definite Null Objects in (spoken) French: A Construction-Grammar Account,” in Mirjam Fried and Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–56.Find this resource:

Lambrecht, Knud, and Michaelis, Laura A. (1998). “Sentence Accent in Information Questions.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21/5: 477–544.Find this resource:

Langacker, Ronald W. (1986). “An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar.” Cognitive Science 10: 1–40.Find this resource:

———. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1988 a). “An Overview of Cognitive Grammar,” in Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49–90.Find this resource:

———. (1988 b). “Usage-Based Model,” in Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–61.Find this resource:

———. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1993). “Reference Point Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1–38.Find this resource:

———. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

———. (2000a). Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar (2nd edn.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

———. (2000 b). “A Dynamic Usage-based Model,” in Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1–63.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Construction Grammars: Cognitive, Radical and Less So,” in Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 101–59.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Cognitive Grammar,” in Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 421–62.Find this resource:

———. (2008 a). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2008 b). “Sequential and Summary Scanning: A Reply.” Cognitive Linguistics 19: 571–84.Find this resource:

———. (2009 a). Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

———. (2009 b). “Constructions and Constructional Meaning,” in Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 225–67.Find this resource:

———. (2009 c). “Cognitive (Construction) Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 20: 167–76.Find this resource:

LaPolla, Randy, Kratochvíl, František, and Coupe, Alexander R. (2011). “On Transitivity.” Studies in Language 35/3: 469–91.Find this resource:

Laudan, Larry (1977). Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Find this resource:

Lehmann, Christian (1985). “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change.” Lingua e Stile 20: 303–18.Find this resource:

———. (1995). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Find this resource:

Leino, Jaakko (ed.) (2008). Constructional Reorganization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

(p. 554) ———. (2010). “Results, Cases and Constructions: Argument Structure Constructions in English and Finnish,” in Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 103–36.Find this resource:

Leino, Jaakko, and Kuningas, Johanna (2005). “Structure Informationnelle et l’ordre des Mots avec les Exemples du Français, Kabyle et du Finnois,” in Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest (ed.), Les Langues Ouraliennes Aujourd’hui—The Uralic Languages Today. Bibliothèque de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes. Paris: Editions Honoré Champion, 587–98.Find this resource:

Leino, Jaakko, and Östman, Jan-Ola (2005). “Constructions and Variability,” in Mirjam Fried and Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 191–213.Find this resource:

Leino, Pentti, and Östman, Jan-Ola (2008). “Language Change, Variability and Functional Load: Finnish Genericity from a Constructional Point of View,” in Jaakko Leino (ed.), Constructional Reorganization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 37–54.Find this resource:

Levelt, Willem (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Levelt, Willem, Roelofs, Ardie, and Meyer, Antje (1999). “A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 1–75.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth, and Hovav, Malka Rappaport (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Levin, Beth, and Rapoport, Tova R. (1988). “Lexical Subordination.” Chicago Linguistic Society 24: 275–89.Find this resource:

Levinson, Stephen A. (1997.) “Yélî Dnye and the Theory of Basic Color Terms.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10: 3–55.Find this resource:

Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Levinson, Stephen C., Meira, Sérgio, and the Language and Cognition Group (2003). “‘Natural Concepts’ in the Spatial Topological Domain—Adpositional Meanings in Crosslinguistic Perspective: An Exercise in Semantic Typology.” Language 79/3: 485–516.Find this resource:

Lewis, Michael (1993). The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and the Way Forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.Find this resource:

Li, Charles N. (1976). Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.Find this resource:

Lichtenberk, František (1991). “On the Gradualness of Grammaticalization,” in Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 37–80.Find this resource:

Lichtheim, Ludwig (1885). “On Aphasia.” Brain 7: 433–84.Find this resource:

Lidz, Jeffrey, Gleitman, Henry, and Gleitman, Lila (2003). “Understanding How Input Matters: Verb Learning and the Footprint of Universal Grammar.” Cognition 87: 151–78.Find this resource:

Lieber, Rochelle (2009). “IE, Germanic: English,” in Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 357–69.Find this resource:

Lieven, Elena V. M., Behrens, Heike, Speakers, Jennifer, and Tomasello, Michael (2003). “Early Syntactic Creativity: A Usage-based Approach.” Journal of Child Language 30: 333–70.Find this resource:

(p. 555) Lieven, Elena V. M., Pine, Julian M., and Baldwin, Gillian (1997). “Lexically-based Learning and Early Grammatical Development.” Journal of Child Language 24: 187–219.Find this resource:

Lieven, Elena V. M., Salomon, Dorothé, and Michael Tomasello (2009). “Two-year old Children's Production of Multiword Utterances: A Usage-based Analysis.” Cognitive Linguistics 20/3: 481–507.Find this resource:

Lightbown, Patsy M., Spada, Nina, and White, Lydia (1993). “The Role of Instruction in Second Language Acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15/2: 143–45.Find this resource:

Lightfoot, David W. (1979). Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2002). “Myths and the Prehistory of Grammars.” Journal of Linguistics 38/1: 113–36.Find this resource:

———. (2006). How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lin, Dekang (1999). “Automatic Identification of Noncompositional Phrases.” Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the ACL, College Park, USA, 317–24.Find this resource:

Lindstromberg, Seth, and Boers, Frank (2008). “The Mnemonic Effect of Noticing Alliteration in Lexical Chunks.” Applied Linguistics 29: 200–222.Find this resource:

Linell, Per (2009). “Grammatical Constructions in Dialogue,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Contexts and Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 97–110.Find this resource:

Littlemore, Jeannette (2009) . Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Find this resource:

Long, Michael. H. (1991). “Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology,” in Kees d. Bot, Ralph B. Ginsberg, and Claire Kramsch (eds.), Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–52.Find this resource:

López-Couso, Maria José(2010). “Subjectification and Intersubjectification,” in Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 127–63.Find this resource:

Los, Bettelou, Blom, Corrien, Booij, Geert, Elenbaas, Marion, and Van Kemenade, Ans (2012). Morpho-syntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Lüdeling, Anke, and Kytö, Merja (eds.) (2008). Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Luraghi, Silvia (2010). “The Rise (and Possible Downfall) of Configurationality,” in Silvia Luraghi and Vit Bubenik (eds.), A Companion to Historical Linguistics. London: Continuum Books, 212–29.Find this resource:

MacDonald, Maryellen, Perlmutter, Neal, and Seidenberg, Mark (1994). “The Lexical Nature of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution.” Psychological Review 101: 676–703.Find this resource:

MacWhinney, Brian (1987 a). “Applying the Competition Model to Bilingualism.” Applied Psycholinguistics 8/4: 315–27.Find this resource:

———. (1987 b). “The Competition Model,” in Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 249–308.Find this resource:

———. (1997). “Second Language Acquisition and the Competition Model,” in Annette M. B. De Groot and Judith F. Kroll (eds.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 113–42.Find this resource:

———. (1998). “Models of the Emergence of Language.” Annual Review of Psychology 49: 199–227.Find this resource:

(p. 556) ———. (2001). “The Competition Model: The Input, the Context and the Brain,” in Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69–90.Find this resource:

MacWhinney, Brian, and Bates, Elizabeth (1978). “Sentential Devices for Conveying Givenness and Newness: A Cross-cultural Developmental Study.” Journal of Communication Disorders 17: 539–58.Find this resource:

Madden, Carol J., and Zwaan, Rolf A. (2003). “How Does Verb Aspect Constrain Event Representations?” Memory and Cognition 31: 663–72.Find this resource:

Mair, Christian (2004). “Corpus Linguistics and Grammaticalisation Theory: Statistics, Frequencies and Beyond,” in Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalisation in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121–50.Find this resource:

———. (2006). Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Makkai, Adam (1972). Idiom Structure in English. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Mallory, James P., and Adams, Douglas Q. (2006). The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Mann, William C.. and Thompson, Sandra A. (1988). “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8: 243–81.Find this resource:

Manning, Christopher, and Carpenter, Bob (1997). “Probabilistic Parsing Using Left-corner Language Models,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Parsing Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 147–58.Find this resource:

Marandin, Jean-Marie (2006). “Contours as Constructions.” Constructions SV1–10. http://www.elanguage.net/journals/index.php/constructions/index.

Marantz, Alec (1997). “No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon.” Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. 4/2: 201–25.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “Generative Linguistics with the Cognitive Neuroscience of Language.” Linguistic Review 22: 429–45.Find this resource:

Margerie, Hélène (2008). “A Historical and Collexeme Analysis of the Development of the Compromiser fairly.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9/2: 288–314.Find this resource:

Marr, David (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Find this resource:

Martin, Alex (2007). “The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain.” Annual Review of Psychology 58: 25–45.Find this resource:

Masson, Michael E. J., Bub, Daniel N., and Warren, Christopher M. (2008). “Kicking Calculators: Contribution of Embodied Representations to Sentence Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 59: 256–65.Find this resource:

Mathieu, Eric (2006). “Quirky Subjects in Old French.” Studia Linguistica 60/3: 282–312.Find this resource:

Matlock, Teenie (2004). “Fictive Motion as Cognitive Simulation.” Memory and Cognition 32: 1389–400.Find this resource:

Matsumoto, Yo (2007). “Typological Split in Linguistic Expressions for Motion Events: Motion, Caused Motion, and Fictive Caused Motion.” Presentation at the 3rd Seoul International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics. Korea University.Find this resource:

McCarthy, Diana, Keller, Bill, and Carroll, John (2003). “Detecting a Continuum of Compositionality in Phrasal Verbs,” in Association for Computational Linguistics (p. 557) (eds.), Proceedings of the ACL-Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Analysis, Acquisition and Treatment. Stroudsburg, PA: ACL Press, 73–80.Find this resource:

McCarthy, John (1982). “Prosodic Structure and Expletive Infixation.” Language 58: 574–90.Find this resource:

McCawley, James D. [Đông, Quang Phúc] (1971). “English Sentences without Overt Grammatical Subject.” http://douglemoine.com.

———. (1988 a). The Syntactic Phenomena of English. 2 vols. (2nd edn. 1998). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

———. (1988 b). “The Comparative Conditional Construction in English, German and Mandarin Chinese.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 176–87.Find this resource:

McClelland, James L., and Patterson, Karalyn (2002). “Rules or Connections in Past-tense Inflections: What does the Evidence Rule out?” Trends in Cognitive Science 6/11: 465–72.Find this resource:

McDonough, Kim (2006). “Interaction and Syntactic Priming: English L2 speakers’ Production of Dative Constructions.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 179–207.Find this resource:

McDonough, Kim, and Mackey, Alison (2006). “Responses to Recasts: Repetitions, Primed Production and Linguistic Development.” Language Learning 56: 693–720.Find this resource:

McDonough, Kim, and Trofimovich, Pavel (2008). Using Priming Methods in Second Language Research. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

McEnery, Tony, and Wilson, Andrew (2001). Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction (2nd edn.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

McGlone, Matthew S., Glucksberg, Sam, and Cacciari, Cristina (1994). “Semantic Productivity and Idiom Comprehension.” Discourse Processes 17/2: 176–90.Find this resource:

McLaughlin, Barry (1995). “Fostering Second Language Development in Young Children: Principles and Practices. http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/miscpubs/ncrcdsll/epr14.htm.

McRae, Ken, Hare, Mary, Elman, Jeffrey L., and Ferretti, Todd (2006). “A Basis for Generating Expectancies for Verbs from Nouns.” Memory and Cognition 33: 1174–84.Find this resource:

Meisel, Jürgen M. (1994). “Parameters in Acquisition,” in Paul Fletcher and Brain MacWhinney (eds.), Handbook of Child Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 9–35.Find this resource:

Melinger, Alissa, and Dobel, Christian (2005). “Lexically-driven Syntactic Priming.” Cognition 98: B11–B20.Find this resource:

Mettouchi, Amina (2003) “Contrastive Focalization on Clefts in Taqbaylit Berber.” Proceedings of IP2003 Interfaces Prosodiques, Nantes, 27–29 Mars 2003, 143–48.Find this resource:

———. (2008) “Case-marking, Syntactic Domains and Information Structure in Kabyle (Berber),” in Zygmund Frajzyngier and Erin Shay (eds.), Interaction of Morphology and Syntax: Case Studies in Afroasiatic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–40.Find this resource:

Michaelis, Laura A. (1994). “A Case of Constructional Polysemy in Latin.” Studies in Language 18: 45–70.Find this resource:

———. (2001). “Exclamative Constructions,” in Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Österreicher, and Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Universals and Language Typology: An International Handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1038–50.Find this resource:

———. (2004). “Type Shifting in Construction Grammar: An Integrated Approach to Aspectual Coercion.” Cognitive Linguistics 15/1: 1–67.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Sign-Based Construction Grammar,” in Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 155–76.Find this resource:

(p. 558) ———. (2012). “Making the Case for Construction Grammar,” in Hans Boas and Ivan Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1–38.Find this resource:

Michaelis, Laura A., and Lambrecht, Knud (1994). “On Nominal Extraposition: A Constructional Analysis.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 20: 262–73.Find this resource:

———. (1996). “Toward a Construction-Based Model of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition.” Language 72: 215–47.Find this resource:

Michaelis, Laura A., and Ruppenhofer, Josef (2001). Beyond Alternations: A Constructional Model of the German Applicative Pattern. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Minkova, Donka (2003). Alliteration and Sound Change in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Mintz, Toben H., Newport, Elissa L., and Bever, Thomas G. (2002). “The Distributional Structure of Grammatical Categories in the Speech to Young Children.” Cognitive Science 26: 393–424.Find this resource:

Mithun, Mariane (2008). “Borrowed Rhetorical Constructions as Starting Points for Grammaticalization,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 195–230.Find this resource:

Mok, Eva (2008). “Contextual Bootstrapping for Grammar Learning.” Ph.D. dissertation. Computer Science Department, University of California, Berkeley.Find this resource:

Mok, Eva, and Bryant, John (2006). “A Best-Fit Approach to Productive Omission of Arguments.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 32: 1–10.Find this resource:

Mok, Eva, Bryant, John, and Feldman, Jerome (2004). “Scaling Understanding up to Mental Spaces.” Proceedings of the Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding. Boston, MA, 41–8.Find this resource:

Moon, Rosamund (1998). Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Find this resource:

Morgan, Pamela S. (1997). “Figuring out figure out: Metaphor and the Semantics of the English Verb-particle Construction.” Cognitive Linguistics 8: 327–58.Find this resource:

Mos, Maria (2010). Complex Lexical Items. Utrecht: LOT.Find this resource:

Moscoso Del Prado Martín, Fermin, Hauk, Olaf, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann (2006). “Category Specificity in the Processing of Color-related and Form-related words: An ERP Study.” Neuroimage 29/1: 29–37.Find this resource:

Mukherjee, Joybrato (2001). Form and Function of Parasyntactic Presentation Structures: A Corpus-based Study of Talk Units in Spoken English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Find this resource:

Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Gries, Stefan Th. (2009). “Collostructional Nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction Associations in the International Corpus of English.” English World-Wide 30/1: 27–51.Find this resource:

Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Hoffmann, Sebastian (2006). “Describing Verb-complementational Profiles of New Englishes: A Pilot Study of Indian English.” English World-Wide 27: 147–73.Find this resource:

Müller, Stefan (2006). “Phrasal or Lexical Constructions?” Language 82/4: 850–83.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “Persian Complex Predicates and the Limits of Inheritance-based Analyses.” Journal of Linguistics 46: 601–55.Find this resource:

Murphy, Gregory (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Näätänen, Risto, Gaillard, Anthony W., and Mäntysalo, Sirkka (1978). “Early Selective-attention Effect on Evoked Potential Reinterpreted.” Acta Psychologica 42: 313–29.Find this resource:

(p. 559) Näätänen, Risto, Paavilainen, Petri, Rinne, Teemu, and Alho, Kimmo (2007). “The Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in Basic Research of Central Auditory Processing: A Review [Dec].” Clinical Neurophysiology 118: 2544–90.Find this resource:

Näätänen, Risto, Tervaniemi, Mari, Sussman, Elyse, Paavilainen, Petri, and Winkler, István (2001). “‘Primitive Intelligence’ in the Auditory Cortex.” Trends in Neurosciences 24/5: 283–88.Find this resource:

Nader, Karim, Schafe, Glenn E., and le Doux, Joseph E. (2000). “Fear Memories Require Protein Synthesis in the Amygdale for Reconsolidation after Retrieval.” Nature 406: 722–26.Find this resource:

Naigles, Letitia (1990). “Children Use Syntax to Learn Verb Meanings.” Journal of Child Language 17: 357–74.Find this resource:

Naigles, Letitia, Bavin, Edith, and Smith, Melissa (2005). “Toddlers Recognize Verbs in Novel Situations and Sentences.” Developmental Science 8: 424–31.Find this resource:

Narayanan, Srini (1997). “Knowledge-based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect (KARMA).” Ph.D. dissertation, Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley.Find this resource:

Nattinger, James R. (1980). “A Lexical Phrase Grammar for ESL.” TESOL Quarterly 14: 337–44.Find this resource:

Nattinger, Jeanette R., and DeCarrico, Jeanette S. (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean, and Aarts, Bas (2002). Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Nemoto, Noriko (1998). “On the Polysemy of Ditransitive save: The Role of Frame Semantics in Construction Grammar.” English Linguistics 15: 219–42.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Verbal Polysemy and Frame Semantics in Construction Grammar,” in Mirjam Fried and Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 118–36.Find this resource:

Nesset, Tore (2008). Abstract Phonology in a Concrete Model: Cognitive Linguistics and the Morphology-Phonology Interface. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Nevalainen, Terttu, and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena (2003). Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Pearson Education.Find this resource:

Neville, Helen, Nicol, Janet L., Barss, Andrew, Forster, Kenneth I., and Garrett, Merrill F. (1991). “Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3: 151–65.Find this resource:

Newell, Allen (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Newmeyer, Frederick J. (2000). Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Nicolas, Tim (1995). “Semantics of Idiom Modification,” in Martin Everaert, Erik-Jan van der Linden, Andre Schenk, and Rob Schreuder (eds.), Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 233–52.Find this resource:

Nichols, Johanna (1986). “Head-Marking and Dependent-Marking Grammar.” Language 62: 56–119.Find this resource:

———. (1988). “On Alienable and Inalienable Possession,” in William Shipley (ed.), In Honor of Mary Haas: From the Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 557–609.Find this resource:

———. (1992). Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

(p. 560) ———. (2003). “Diversity and Stability in Language,” in Brian Joseph and Richard Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 283–311.Find this resource:

Nikiforidou, Kiki, and Cacoullos, Rena Torres (2010). “Variably Future-marked Conditionals in Greek: Integrating Discourse and Grammar.” Constructions and Frames 2: 90–123.Find this resource:

Ninio, Anat (1999). “Pathbreaking Verbs in Syntactic Development and the Question of Prototypical Transitivity.” Journal of Child Language 26: 619–53.Find this resource:

———. (2006). Language and the Learning Curve: A New Theory of Syntactic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Nir, Bracha (2008). “Clause Packages as Constructions in Developing Narrative Discourse.” Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Find this resource:

Nir, Bracha, and Berman, Ruth A. (2010 a). “Parts of Speech Constructions: The Case of Hebrew ‘Adverbs’.” Constructions and Frames 2/2: 242–74.Find this resource:

———. (2010 b). “Complex Syntax as a Window on Contrastive Rhetoric.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 744–65.Find this resource:

Noël, Dirk (2007 a). “Diachronic Construction Grammar and Grammaticalization Theory.” Functions of Language 14/2: 177–202.Find this resource:

———. (2007 b). “Verb Valency Patterns, Constructions and Grammaticalization,” in Thomas Herbst and Karin Kötz-Votteler (eds.), Valency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues. Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 67–83.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “The Nominative and Infinitive in Late Modern English: A Diachronic Constructionist Approach.” Journal of English Linguistics 36/4: 314–40.Find this resource:

Noël, Dirk, and Colleman, Timothy (2009). “The Nominative and Infinitive in English and Dutch: An Exercise in Contrastive Diachronic Construction Grammar.” Languages in Contrast 9: 144–81.Find this resource:

Noël, Dirk, and van der Auwera, Johan (2009). “Revisiting <be supposed to> from a Diachronic Constructionist Perspective.” English Studies 90/5: 599–623.Find this resource:

Noonan, Michael (1998). “Non-structuralist Syntax,” in Michael Darnell, Edith Moravcsik, Frederick Newmeyer, Michael Noonan, and Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics. Studies in Language Companion Series 41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–31.Find this resource:

Nooteboom, Sieb, Weerman, Fred, and Wijnen, Frank (eds.) (2002). Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Norde, Muriel (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Norris, John, and Ortega, Lourdes (2000). “Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-analysis.” Language Learning 50: 417–528.Find this resource:

Nosofsky, Robert M. (1988). “Similarity, Frequency and Category Representations.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14: 54–65.Find this resource:

Nübling, Damaris (2005). “Von in dieüber in’n und ins bis im: Die Klitisierung von Präposition und Artikel als ‘Grammatikalisierungsbaustelle’,” in Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans, and Sarah De Groodt (eds.), Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 105–31.Find this resource:

Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A., and Wasow, Thomas (1994). “Idioms.” Language 70: 491–538.Find this resource:

Nuyts, Jan (2007). “Cognitive Linguistics and Functional Linguistics,” in Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 421–62.Find this resource:

(p. 561) Nyberg, Lars, Petersson, Karl Magnus, Nilsson, Lars-Göran, Sandblom, Johan, Åberg, Carola, and Ingvar, Martin (2001). “Reactivation of Motor Brain Areas during Explicit Memory for Actions.” NeuroImage 14: 521–28.Find this resource:

Odlin, Terence (1989). Language Transfer. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Conceptual Transfer and Meaning Extensions,” in Peter Robinson and Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 306–40.Find this resource:

O’Donnell, Matt, and Ellis, Nick C. (2010). “Towards an Inventory of English Verb Argument Constructions.” Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles, June 1–6, 2010, 9–16.Find this resource:

OED (The Oxford English Dictionary). http://www.oed.com/.

O’Grady, William (1997). Syntactic Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Ohala, John (1989). “Sound Change is Drawn from a Pool of Synchronic Variation,” in Leiv Egil Breivik and Ernst Håkon Jahr (eds.), Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 173–98.Find this resource:

Ohara, Kyoko Hirose (1994). “An Event-reporting Relative Construction in Japanese.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 20: 260–72.Find this resource:

———. (1996). “A Constructional Approach to Japanese Internally-Headed Relativization.” Ph.D. dissertation, U.C. Berkeley.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “From Relativization to Clause-linkage: Evidence from Modern Japanese,” in Mirjam Fried and Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57–70.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Frame-based Contrastive Lexical Semantics in Japanese FrameNet: The Case of risk and kakeru,” in Hans C. Boas (ed.), Multilingual FrameNets in Computational Lexicography: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 163–82.Find this resource:

———. (2011). “Full Text Annotations in Japanese FrameNet: Annotating BCCWJ with Semantic Frames,” (in Japanese.) In Association for Natural Language Processing (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Association for Natural Language Processing. Tokyo: Nakanishi Printing Company, 703–4.Find this resource:

Ohori, Toshio (2005). “Construction Grammar as a Conceptual Framework for Linguistic Typology: A Case from Reference Tracking,” in Mirjam Fried and Hans C. Boas (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 215–37.Find this resource:

Onishi, Kristine, Murphy, Gregory, and Bock, Kathryn (2008). “Prototypicality in Sentence Production.” Cognitive Psychology 56: 103–41.Find this resource:

Ooi, Vincent B. Y. (1998). Computer Corpus Lexicography. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Find this resource:

Oosterhof, Albert, and Coussé, Evie (2010). “Form, Meaning and Use of Participial Imperatives in Dutch: A Constructional Perspective.” Paper given at the 6th International Conference of Construction Grammar ICCG6, Charles University, Prague, September 3–5, 2010.Find this resource:

Ortega, Lourdes, and Iberri-Shea, Gina (2005). “Longitudinal Research in Second Language Acquisition: Recent Trends and Future Directions.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25: 26–45.Find this resource:

Osterhout, Lee, and Hagoort, Peter (1999). “A Superficial Resemblance does not Necessarily Mean you are Part of the Family: Counterarguments to Coulson, King and (p. 562) Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 Debate.” Language and Cognitive Processes 14: 1–14.Find this resource:

Osterhout, Lee, and Holcomb, Phillip J. (1992). “Event-related Brain Potentials Elicited by Syntactic Anomaly.” Journal of Memory and Language 31: 785–806.Find this resource:

Östman, Jan-Ola (1999). “Coherence through Understanding through Discourse Patterns: Focus on News Reports,” in Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk, and Eija Ventola (eds.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 77–100.Find this resource:

———. (2002). “Sulvan Kansan Wellerismit Konstruktiona,” in Ilona Herlin et al. (eds.), Äidinkielen Merkitykset. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society 869, 75–97.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Construction Discourse: A Prolegomenon,” in Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121–44.Find this resource:

Östman, Jan-Ola, and Virtanen, Tuija (1999). “Theme, Comment and Newness as Figures in Information Structuring,” in Karen van Hoek, Andrej A. Kibrik, and Leo Noordman (eds.), Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 91–110.Find this resource:

Oxford English Dictionary (1989). http://www.oed.com.

Page, Mike P. A. (2006). “What Can’t Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Cognitive Psychologist?” Cortex 42/3: 428–43.Find this resource:

Palancar, Enrique (1999). “What do We Give in Spanish When We Hit? A Constructionist Account of Hitting Expressions.” Cognitive Linguistics 10: 57–91.Find this resource:

Patten, Amanda (2010). “Grammaticalization and the it-cleft Construction,” in Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 221–43.Find this resource:

Patterson, Karalyn, Nestor, Peter J., and Rogers, Timothy T. (2007). “Where do You Know What You Know? The Representation of Semantic Knowledge in the Human Brain.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 976–87.Find this resource:

Paul, Hermann (1886). “On Sound Change,” in Philip Baldi and Ronald N. Werth (eds.), Readings in Historical Phonology: Chapters in the Theory of Sound Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 3–22.Find this resource:

Pawley, Andrew, and Syder, Frances (1983). “Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency,” in Jack C. Richards and Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and Communication. London: Longman, 191–226.Find this resource:

Pedersen, Inge Lise (2010). “The Role of Social Factors in the Shaping of Language Attitudes—with an Evaluation of the Concept of Life Style.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204: 129–50.Find this resource:

Pedersen, Johan (2005). “The Spanish Impersonal se-constructions: Constructional Variation and Change.” Constructions 1/2005. http://www.constructions-online.de/articles/145.

Pedersen, Ted (1996). “Fishing for Exactness.” Proceedings of the South Central SAS User Group Conference, Austin, TX: South Central SAS User Group, 188–200.Find this resource:

Perdue, Clive (1993). Adult Language Acquisition. 2 vols. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Perfors, Amy, Kemp, Charles, Tenenbaum, Josh, and Wonnacott, Elizabeth (2007). “Learning Inductive Constraints: The Acquisition of Verb Argument Constructions.” Paper given at the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 1836.Find this resource:

(p. 563) Perner Josef, Frith, Uta, Leslie, Alan M., and Leekam, Susan R. (1989). “Exploration of the Autistic Child's Theory of Mind: Knowledge, Belief and Communication.” Child Development 60: 688–700.Find this resource:

Pesetsky, David (1999). “Linguistic Universals and Universal Grammar,” in Robert A. Wilson and Frank G. Keil (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 476–78.Find this resource:

Peterson, Robert R., and Burgess, Curt (1993). “Syntactic and Semantic Processing during Idiom Comprehension: Neurolinguistic and Psycholinguistic Dissociations,” in Cristina Cacciari and Patrizia Tabossi (eds.), Idioms: Processing, Structure and Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 201–25.Find this resource:

Petré, Peter, and Cuyckens, Hubert (2008). “Bedusted, yet not Beheaded: The Role of be-“s Constructional Properties in its Conservation,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 133–70.Find this resource:

Petruck, Miriam R. L. (1996). “Frame Semantics,” in Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics 1996. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–11.Find this resource:

Pickering, Martin J. (2006). “The Dance of Dialogue.” The Psychologist 19: 734–37.Find this resource:

Pickering, Martin J., and Branigan, Holly (1998). “The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Persistence in Written Language Production.” Journal of Memory and Language 39: 633–51.Find this resource:

Pickering, Martin J., Branigan, Holly, Cleland, Alexandra, and Stewart, Andrew (2000). “Activation of Syntactic Information during Language Production.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29: 205–16.Find this resource:

Pickering, Martin J., Branigan, Holly, and McLean, Janet (2002). “Constituent Structure is Formulated in One Stage.” Journal of Memory and Language 46: 586–605.Find this resource:

Pickering, Martin J., and Garrod, Simon (2004). “Toward a Mechanistic Theory of Dialogue.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 169–226.Find this resource:

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2001). “Exemplar Dynamics: Word Frequency, Lenition and Contrast,” in Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137–57.Find this resource:

Pine, Julian M., and Lieven, Elena V. M. (1993). “Reanalyzing Rote-learned Phrases: Individual Differences in the Transition to Multi-word speech.” Journal of Child Language 20: 551–71.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1989) Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (1999). Words and Rules. New York: Basic Books.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven, and Jackendoff, Ray (2005). “The Faculty of Language: What's Special about it?” Cognition 95: 201–36.Find this resource:

Pinker, Steven, Lebeaux, David S., and Frost, Loren Ann (1987). “Productivity and Constraints in the Acquisition of the Passive.” Cognition 26: 195–267.Find this resource:

Pires, Acrisio, and Thomason, Sarah G. (2008). “How Much Syntactic Reconstruction is Possible?,” in Gisella Ferraresi and Maria Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27–72.Find this resource:

(p. 564) Polinsky, Maria (1998). “A Non-Syntactic Account of some Asymmetries in the Double Object Construction,” in Jean-Paul Koenig (ed.), Conceptual Structure and Language: Bridging the Gap. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 403–23.Find this resource:

Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan A. (1987). Information-based Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 1: Fundamentals. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

———. (1994). Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Find this resource:

Posner, Michael I., and Keele, Steven W. (1970). “Retention of Abstract Ideas.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 83: 304–8.Find this resource:

PPCEME (The Penn Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English). http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/.

PPCME2 (The Penn Parsed Corpus of Middle English). http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/.

Prat-Sala, Mercè, and Branigan, Holly (2000). “Discourse Constraints on Syntactic Processing in Language Production: A Cross-linguistic Study in English and Spanish.” Journal of Memory and Language 42: 168–82.Find this resource:

Prince, Ellen F. (1978). “A Comparison of WH-clefts and It-clefts in Discourse.” Language 54/4: 883–906.Find this resource:

———. (1981). “Toward a Taxonomy of Given–new Information,” in Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223–55.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann (1993). “On Connecting Syntax and the Brain,” in Ad Aertsen (ed.), Brain Theory—Spatio-temporal Aspects of Brain Function. New York: Elsevier, 131–45.Find this resource:

———. (1999). “Words in the Brain's Language.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 253–336.Find this resource:

———. (2003a). The Neuroscience of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2003b). “Sequence Detectors as a Basis of Grammar in the Brain.” Theory in Biosciences 122: 87–103.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Brain Mechanisms Linking Language and Action.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6/7: 576–82.Find this resource:

———. (2010 a). “Brain Embodiment of Syntax and Grammar: Discrete Combinatorial Mechanisms Spelt out in Neuronal Circuits.” Brain and Language 112/3: 167–79.Find this resource:

———. (2010 b). “Brain Language Research: Where is the Progress?.” Biolinguistics 4/2–3: 255–88.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, and Assadollahi, Ramin (2007). “Grammar or Serial Order?: Discrete Combinatorial Brain Mechanisms Reflected by the Syntactic Mismatch Negativity.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19/6: 971–80.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Birbaumer, Niels, Lutzenberger, Werner, and Mohr, Bettina (1997). “High-frequency Brain Activity: Its Possible Role in Attention, Perception and Language Processing.” Progress in Neurobiology 52/5: 427–45.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, and Fadiga, Luciano (2010). “Active Perception: Sensorimotor Circuits as a Cortical Basis for Language.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11/5: 351–60.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Hauk, Olaf, Nikulin, Vadim, and Ilmoniemi, Risto J. (2005). “Functional Links between Motor and Language Systems.” European Journal of Neuroscience 21/3: 793–97.Find this resource:

(p. 565) Pulvermüller, Friedemann, and Hauk, Olaf (2006). “Category-specific Processing of Color and Form Words in Left Fronto-temporal Cortex.” Cerebral Cortex 16/8: 1193–201.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Hummel, Friedhelm, and Härle, Markus (2001). “Walking or Talking?: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing.” Brain and Language 78/2: 143–68.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, and Knoblauch, Andreas (2009). “Discrete Combinatorial Circuits Emerging in Neural Networks: A Mechanism for Rules of Grammar in the Human Brain?” Neural Networks 22/2: 161–72.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Kujala, Teija, Shtyrov, Yury, Simola, Jaana, Tiitinen, Hannu, Alku, Paavo, Alku, Kimmo, Martinkauppi, Sami, Ilmoniemi, Risto, and Näätänen, Risto (2001). “Memory Traces for Words as Revealed by the Mismatch Negativity.” Neuroimage 14/3: 607–16.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, and Shtyrov, Yury (2006). “Language outside the Focus of Attention: The Mismatch Negativity as a Tool for Studying Higher Cognitive Processes.” Progress in Neurobiology 79/1: 49–71.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Shtyrov, Yury, Hasting, Anna, and Carlyon, Robert P. (2008). “Syntax as a Reflex: Neurophysiological Evidence for Early Automaticity of Grammatical Processing.” Brain and Language 104/1: 244–53.Find this resource:

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Shtyrov, Yury, and Hauk, Olaf (2009). “Understanding in an Instant: Neurophysiological Evidence for Mechanistic Language Circuits in the Brain.” Brain and Language 110/2: 81–94.Find this resource:

Pustejovsky, James (1995). The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffr, and Svartvik, Jan (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Find this resource:

Radden, Günter, and Panther, Klaus-Uwe (2004). Studies in Linguistic Motivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Radford, Andrew (1990). Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Rapp, Brenda, and Caramazza, Alfonso (2002). “Selective Difficulties with Spoken Nouns and Written Verbs: A Single Case Study.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 15: 373–402.Find this resource:

Rapp, Brenda, and Goldrick, Matthew (2000). “Discreteness and Interactivity in Spoken Word Production.” Psychological Review 107: 460–99.Find this resource:

Reali, Florencia, and Christensen, Morten H. (2005). “Uncovering the Richness of the Stimulus: Structure Dependence and Indirect Statistical Evidence.” Cognitive Science 29: 1007–28.Find this resource:

Reddy, Michael J. (1979). “The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in our Language about Language,” in Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 284–324.Find this resource:

Redington, Martin, Chater, Nick, and Finch, Steven (1998). “Distributional Information: A Powerful Cue for Acquiring Syntactic Categories.” Cognitive Science 22: 425–69.Find this resource:

Regier, Terry, and Carlson, Laura (2002). “Spatial Language: Perceptual Constraints and Linguistic Variation,” in Nancy Stein, Patricia Bauer, and Mitchell Rabinowitz (eds.), Representation, Memory and Development: Essays in Honor of Jean Mandler. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 199–222.Find this resource:

Reichardt, Werner, and Varjú, Dezso (1959). “Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen.” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 14b: 674–89.Find this resource:

(p. 566) Rescorla, Robert A. 1968. “Probability of Shock in the Presence and Absence of CS in Fear Conditioning.” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 66:1–5.Find this resource:

Rescorla, Robert A., and Wagner, Allen R. (1972). “A Theory of Pavlovian Conditioning: Variations in the Effectiveness of Reinforcement and Nonreinforcement,” in Abraham H. Black and William F. Prokasy (eds.), Classical Conditioning II: Current Theory and Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 64–99.Find this resource:

Roberts, Paul (1956). Patterns of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Find this resource:

Robinson, Peter (ed.) (2001). Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Robinson, Peter, and Ellis, Nick C. (2008 a). “Conclusion: Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and L2 Instruction—Issues for Research,” in Peter Robinson and Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 489–528.Find this resource:

———. (eds.) (2008 b). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.Find this resource:

Roelofs, Ardi (1998). “Rightward Incrementality in Encoding Simple Phrasal Forms in Speech Production: Verb–participle Combinations.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 94: 904–21.Find this resource:

Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur (1995). “Old Icelandic: A Non-Configurational Language?” North Western European Language Evolution 26: 3–29.Find this resource:

Römer, Ute (2008). “Corpora and Language Teaching,” in Anke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö. (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 112–30.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “The Inseparability of Lexis and Grammar: Corpus Linguistic Perspectives.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 141–63.Find this resource:

Rosch, Eleanor (1973). “Natural Categories.” Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–50.Find this resource:

———. (1978). “Principles of Categorization,” in Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 27–48.Find this resource:

Rosch, Eleanor, and Mervis, Carolyn B. (1975 a). “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories.” Cognitive Psychology7: 573–605.Find this resource:

———. (1975 b). “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104: 192–233.Find this resource:

Rosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B., Gray, Wayne D., Johnson, David M., and Boyes-Braem, Penny (1976). “Basic Objects in Natural Categories.” Cognitive Psychology 8: 382–439.Find this resource:

Rosenbach, Anette (2002). “The English s-genitive: A Case of Degrammaticalization?” in Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and Down the Cline—The Nature of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73–96.Find this resource:

Ross, Brian H., and Makin, Valerie S. (1999). “Prototype versus Exemplar Models,” in Robert J. Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 205–41.Find this resource:

Ross, John R. (1986). Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Find this resource:

Ross, Malcolm (2008). “Negative Verbal Clause Constructions in Puyuma: Exploring Constructional Disharmony,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 171–93.Find this resource:

Rowland, Caroline F. (2007). “Explaining Errors in Children's Questions: Auxiliary DO and Modal Auxiliaries.” Cognition 104: 106–34.Find this resource:

(p. 567) Rowland, Caroline F., and Pine, Julian M. (2000). “Subject-auxiliary Inversion Errors and Wh-question Acquisition: What Children do Know?” Journal of Child Language 27: 157–81.Find this resource:

Rumelhardt, David, and McClelland, James (1986). “On Learning the Past Tenses of English Verbs,” in James McClelland and David Rumelhardt (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing. Vol. 2: Psychological and Biological Models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 216–71.Find this resource:

Sadler, Louisa, and Spencer, Andrew (2001). “Syntax as an Exponent of Morphological Features,” in Geert Booij and Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 71–96.Find this resource:

Sadock, Jerrold (1991). Autolexical Syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Find this resource:

Saffran, Jenny R. (2001). “The Use of Predictive Dependencies in Language Learning.” Journal of Memory and Language 44: 493–515.Find this resource:

———. (2002). “Constraints on Statistical Language Learning.” Journal of Memory and Language 47: 172–96.Find this resource:

Sag, Ivan A. (1997). “English Relative Clause Constructions.” Journal of Linguistics 33: 431–84.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Remarks on Locality,” in Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG07 Conference, Stanford University. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 394–414.Find this resource:

———. (2010). “English Filler-gap Constructions.” Language 86/3: 486–545.Find this resource:

———. (2012). “Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis,” in Hans C. Boas and Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 39–170.Find this resource:

Sag, Ivan A., Hofmeister, Philip, and Snider, Neal (2007). “Processing Complexity in Subjacency Violations: The Complex Noun Phrase Constraint.” Chicago Linguistics Society 43/1: 215–29.Find this resource:

Sag, Ivan A., Wasow, Thomas, and Bender, Emily M. (2003). Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali, and Smith, Eric (2005). Goldvarb X: A Variable Rule Application for Macintosh and Windows. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto. http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/Goldvarb/GV_index.htm.Find this resource:

Santelmann, Lynn, Berk, Stephanie, Austin, Jennifer, Somashekar, Shamitha and Lust, Barbara (2002). “Continuity and Development in the Acquisition of Inversion in Yes/No Questions: Dissociating Movement and Inflection.” Journal of Child Language 29: 813–42.Find this resource:

Sarangi, Srikant (2010). “Reconfiguring Self/Identity/Status/Role: The Case of Professional Role Performance in Healthcare Encounters,” in Giuliana Garzone and James Archibald (eds.), Discourse, Identities and Roles in Specialized Communication. Bern: Peter Lang: 33–57.Find this resource:

Sato, Manami (2010). “Message in the ‘Body’: Effects of Simulation in Sentence Production.” Ph.D. dissertation. Linguistics Department, University of Hawaii, Manoa.Find this resource:

Savage, Ceri, Lieven, Elena, Theakston, Anna and Tomasello, Michael (2003). “Testing the Abstractness of Children's Linguistic Representations: Lexical and Structural Priming of Syntactic Constructions.” Developmental Science 6: 557–67.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “Structural Priming as Implicit Learning in Language Acquisition: The Persistence of Lexical and Structural Priming in 4-year-olds.” Language Learning and Development 2: 27–49.Find this resource:

(p. 568) Schiering, René, Bickel, Balthasar, and Hildebrandt, Kristine A. (2010). “The Prosodic Word is not Universal.” Journal of Linguistics 46: 657–709.Find this resource:

Schmid, Hans-Jörg (2010). “Does Frequency in Text Instantiate Entrenchment in the Cognitive System?” in Dylan Glynn and Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 101–34.Find this resource:

Schmidt, Richard (1990). “The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning.” Applied Linguistics 11: 129–58.Find this resource:

———. (2001). “Attention,” in Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–32.Find this resource:

Schmied, Josef (2004). “East African English Phonology,” in Bernd Kortmann, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar W. Schneider, and Clive Upton (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 918–30.Find this resource:

Schmitt, Norbert (ed.) (2004). Formulaic Sequences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Schneider, Edgar W. (2003). “How to Trace Structural Nativization: Particle Verbs in World Englishes.” World Englishes 23: 227–49.Find this resource:

———. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Schneider, Nathan (2010). “Computational Cognitive Morphosemantics: Modeling Morphological Compositionality in Hebrew Verbs with Embodied Construction Grammar.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 36.Find this resource:

Schone, Patrick, and Jurafsky, Daniel (2001). “Is Knowledge-free Induction of Multiword Unit Dictionary Headwords a Solved Problem?” Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: 100’8. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W01/#0500.Find this resource:

Schönefeld, Doris (2006). “From Conceptualization to Linguistic Expression: Where Languages Diversify,” in Stefan Th. Gries and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: The Syntax-Lexis Interface. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 297–344.Find this resource:

Schuchardt, Hugo (1885). Über die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: R. Oppenheim.Find this resource:

Segerståhl, Sinikka (2011). Vaggvisor i Kvevlax: Språkliga Strukturer och Konstruktioner. Helsinki: Nordica Helsingiensia 24.Find this resource:

Sereno, Sara C., Rayner, Keith, and Posner, Michael I., 1998. “Establishing a Time-line of Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements and Event-related Potentials.” NeuroReport 9: 2195–200.Find this resource:

Shanks, David R. (1995). The Psychology of Associative Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Shieber, Stuart (1986). An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Find this resource:

Shimpi, Priya, Gámez, Perla B., Huttenlocher, Janellen, and Vasilyeva, Marina. (2007). “Using Syntactic Priming to Track Emerging Linguistic Representations of Transitive and Dative Constructions.” Developmental Psychology 43/6: 1334–46.Find this resource:

Shtyrov, Yury, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann (2002). “Neurophysiological Evidence of Memory Traces for Words in the Human Brain.” Neuroreport 13: 521–25.Find this resource:

Shtyrov, Yury, Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Näätänen, Risto, and Ilmoniemi, Risto J. (2003). “Grammar Processing outside the Focus of Attention: An MEG Study.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15/8: 1195–206.Find this resource:

(p. 569) Siewierska, Anna (1988). Word Order Rules. London: Croom Helm.Find this resource:

Siewierska, Anna, and Hollmann, Willem (2007). “Ditransitive Clauses in English, with Special Reference to Lancashire English,” in Michael Hannay and Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Structural-functional Studies in English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 83–102.Find this resource:

Simmons, W. Kyle, Ramjee, Vimal, Beauchamp, Michael S., McRae, Ken, Martin, Alex, and Barsalou, Lawrence W. (2007). “A Common Neural Substrate for Perceiving and Knowing About Color.” Neuropsychologia 45/12: 2802–10.Find this resource:

Simpson, Jane (1983). “Resultatives,” in Lori Levin, Malka Rappaport, and Annie Zaenen (eds.), Papers in Lexical-functional Grammar. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 143–57.Find this resource:

Sinclair, John (ed.) (1987). Looking up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing. London: HarperCollins.Find this resource:

———. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (1996 a). How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

———. (1996 b). “The Search for Units of Meaning.” Textus 9: 75–106.Find this resource:

Sinha, Chris (1999). “Grounding, Mapping and Acts of Meaning,” in Theo Janssen and Gisela Redeker (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope and Methodology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 223–55.Find this resource:

———. (2004). “The Evolution of Language: From Signals to Symbols to System,” in D. Kimbrough Oller and Ulrike Griebel (eds.), Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 217–35.Find this resource:

Skousen, Royal (1989). Analogical Modeling of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Find this resource:

Slobin, Dan I. (1993). “Adult Language Acquisition: A View from Child Language Study,” in Clive Perdue (ed.), Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 239–52.Find this resource:

———. (1996). “From “Thought and Language” to “Thinking for Speaking”,” in John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 70–96.Find this resource:

———. (1997). “The Origins of Grammaticizable Notions: Beyond the Individual Mind,” in Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 265–323.Find this resource:

Slobin, Dan I., and Bever, Thomas G. (1982). “Children Use Canonical Sentence Schemas: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Word Order and Inflection.” Cognition 12: 229–65.Find this resource:

Smith, K. Aaron, and Nordquist, Dawn (2012). “A Critical and Historical Investigation into Semantic Prosody.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13/2: 291–312.Find this resource:

Smith, Michael B. (1994). “Agreement and Iconicity in Russian Impersonal Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 5: 5–56.Find this resource:

Smitherman, Thomas, and Barðdal, Jóhanna (2009). “Typological Changes in the Evolution of Indo-European Syntax?” Diachronica 26/2: 253–73.Find this resource:

Smolensky, Paul (1999). “Grammar-based Connectionist Approaches to Language.” Cognitive Science 23/4: 589–613.Find this resource:

Sneddon, James M. (1996). Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London and New York: Routledge.Find this resource:

Spada, Nina (1997). “Form-focused Instruction and Second Language Acquisition: A Review of Classroom and Laboratory Research.” Language Teaching Research 30: 73–87.Find this resource:

(p. 570) Speelman, Dirk, Grondelaers, Stefan, and Geeraerts, Dirk (2008). “Variation in the Choice of Adjectives in the Varieties of Dutch,” in Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 205–33.Find this resource:

Speelman, Dirk, Tummers, Jose, and Geeraerts, Dirk (2009). “Lexical Patterning in a Construction Grammar: The Effect of Lexical Co-occurrence Patterns on the Inflectional Variation in Dutch Attributive Adjectives.” Constructions and Frames 1/1: 87–118.Find this resource:

Spencer, Andrew (2001). “The Paradigm-Based Model of Morphosyntax.” Transactions of the Philological Society 99/2: 279–314.Find this resource:

———. (2004). “Morphology—An Overview of Central Concepts,” in Louisa Sadler and Andrew Spencer (eds.), Projecting Morphology. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 67–109.Find this resource:

Spivey, Michael (2006). The Continuity of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

SPRÅKBANKEN (various Swedish corpora). http://spraakbanken.gu.se/.

Spranger, Michael, and Loetzsch, Martin (2011). “Syntactic Indeterminacy and Semantic Ambiguity: A Case Study for German Spatial Phrases.” in Luc Steels (ed.), Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 265–98.Find this resource:

Stallings, Lynne M., MacDonald, Maryellen C., and O'seaghdha, Padraig (1998). “Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift.” Journal of Memory and Language 39: 392–417.Find this resource:

Stanfield, Robert A., and Zwaan, Rolf A. (2001). “The Effect of Implied Orientation Derived from Verbal Context on Picture Recognition.” Psychological Science 12: 153–56.Find this resource:

Stassen, Leon (1985). Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

———. (1997). Intransitive Predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2009). Predicative Possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Steels, Luc (1998). “The Origins of Syntax in Visually Grounded Robotic Agents.” Artificial Intelligence 103: 133–56.Find this resource:

———. (2004). “Constructivist Development of Grounded Construction Grammars,” in Donia Scott, Walter Daelemans, and Marilyn Walker (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference, 9–16. Barcelona: ACL. http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/P/P04/.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “The Recruitment Theory of Language Origins,” in Caroline Lyon, Chrystopher Nehaniv, and Angelo Cangelosi (eds.), The Emergence of Communication and Language. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 129–51.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (2011a) . Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (2011 b). Computational Issues in Fluid Construction Grammar. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Find this resource:

———. (2012). “Introduction: Self-organization and Selection in Language Evolution,” in Luc Steels (ed.), Experiments in Language Evolution. Advances in Interaction Studies 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Steels, Luc, and De Beule, Joachim (2006). “Unify and Merge in Fluid Construction Grammar,” in Paul Vogt, Yuuga Sugita, Elio Tuci, and Chrystopher Nehaniv (eds.), Symbol Grounding and Beyond: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on the Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Communication, LNAI 4211. Berlin: Springer, 197–223.Find this resource:

Stefanowitsch, Anatol (2003). “The English Imperative: A Construction-based Approach.” Ms., Universität Bremen.Find this resource:

(p. 571) ———. (2005). “The Function of Metaphor: Developing a Corpus-based Perspective.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10/2: 161–98.Find this resource:

———. (2006 a). “Negative Evidence and the Raw Frequency Fallacy.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2/1: 61–77.Find this resource:

———. (2006 b). “Konstruktionsgrammatik und Korpuslinguistik,” in Kerstin Fischer and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 151–76.Find this resource:

———. (2006 c). “Distinctive Collexeme Analysis and Diachrony: A Comment.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2/2: 257–62.Find this resource:

———. (2008 a). “Negative Evidence and Preemption: A Constructional Approach to Ungrammaticality.” Cognitive Linguistics 19/3: 513–31.Find this resource:

———. (2008 b). “Negative Entrenchment: A Usage-based Approach to Negative Evidence.” Cognitive Linguistics 19: 513–31.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Bedeutung und Gebrauch in der Konstruktionsgrammatik: Wie Kompositionell sind Modale Infinitive im Deutschen?.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 37/3: 565–92.Find this resource:

———. (2011 a). “Constructional Preemption by Contextual Mismatch: A Corpus-linguistic Investigation.” Cognitive Linguistics 22/1: 107–30.Find this resource:

———. (2011 b). “Cognitive Linguistics Meets the Corpus,” in Mario Brdar, MilenaŽic Fuchs, and Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), Expanding Cognitive Linguistic Horizons. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257–90.Find this resource:

Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Gries, Stefan Th. (2003). “Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8/2: 209–43.Find this resource:

———. (2005). “Co-varying Collexemes.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1/1: 1–43.Find this resource:

———. (2008). “Channel and Constructional Meaning: A Collostructional Case Study,” in Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 129–52.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Corpora and Grammar,” in Anke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö(eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 933–52.Find this resource:

Street, Richard L., Jr., and Giles, Howard (1982). “Speech Accommodation Theory: A Social Cognitive Approach to Language and Speech Behavior,” in Michael E. Roloff and Charles R. Berger (eds.), Social Cognition and Communication. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 193–226.Find this resource:

Stubbs, Michael (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Find this resource:

Suttle, Laura, and Goldberg, Adele E. (2011). “The Partial Productivity of Constructions as Induction.” Linguistics 49/6: 1237–69.Find this resource:

Swales, John M. (1990). Genre Analysis—English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt (2005). “Language Users as Creatures of Habit: A Corpus-based Analysis of Persistence in Spoken English.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistics Theory 1/1: 113–49.Find this resource:

Szymanek, Bogdan (2009). “IE, Slavonic: Polish,” in Rochelle Lieber and Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 464–77.Find this resource:

Tagliamonte, Sali (2004). “Have to, gotta, must. Grammaticalisation, Variation and Specialization in English Deontic Modality,” in Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair (eds.), (p. 572) Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalisation in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 33–55.Find this resource:

———. (2006). Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Tagliamonte, Sali, Poplack, Shana, and Eze, Ejike (1997). “Pluralization Patterns in Nigerian Pidgin English.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 12: 103–29.Find this resource:

Tagliamonte, Sali, and Roeder, Rebecca V. (2009). “Variation in the English Definite Article: Socio-historical Linguistics in t'speech Community.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13: 435–71.Find this resource:

Takahashi, Hidemitsu (2004). “The English Imperative: A Cognitive and Functional Analysis.” Hokaido: Hokaido University dissertation.Find this resource:

Talmy, Leonard (1976). “Semantic Causative Types,” in Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions. New York: Academic Press, 43–116.Find this resource:

———. (1988). “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12: 49–100.Find this resource:

———. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Vol. 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Foreword,” in and Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, xi–xxi.Find this resource:

Taylor, John R. (1995). Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1996). Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Find this resource:

———. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “Polysemy and the Lexicon,” in Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven, and Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds. ), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 51–80.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “Cognitive Linguistics and Autonomous Linguistics,” in Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 421–62.Find this resource:

Tesnière, Lucien (1959). Éléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Find this resource:

Thakerar, Jitendra N., Giles, Howard, and Cheshire, Jenny (1982). “Psychological and Linguistic Parameters of Speech Accommodation Theory,” in Colin Fraser and Klaus R. Scherer (eds.), Advances in the Social Psychology of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press, 205–55.Find this resource:

Thompson, Sandra A., and Koide, Yuka (1987). “Iconicity and ‘Indirect Objects’ in English.” Journal of Pragmatics 11/3: 399–406.Find this resource:

Timberlake, Alan (1977). “Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change,” in Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin: University of Texas Press, 141–80.Find this resource:

TIME (The Time Magazine –from the 1920s to the 2000s). http://corpus.byu.edu/time/.

Timyam, Napasri, and Bergen, Benjamin (2010). “A Contrastive Study of the Caused-motion and Ditransitive Constructions in English and Thai: Semantic and Pragmatic Constraints,” in Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137–68.Find this resource:

Titone, Debra A., and Connine, Cynthia M. (1994). “The Comprehension of Idiomatic Expressions: Effects of Predictability and Literality.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20/5: 1126–38.Find this resource:

(p. 573) Tomasello, Michael (1992). First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

———. (1998 a). “Cognitive Linguistics,” in William Bechtel and George Graham (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Oxford: Blackwell, 477–87.Find this resource:

———. (ed.) (1998 b). The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Find this resource:

———. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition: An Essay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2000 a). “The Item-based Nature of Children's Early Syntactic Development.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 156–63.Find this resource:

———. (2000 b). “Do Young Children have Adult Syntactic Competence?” Cognition 74: 209–53.Find this resource:

———. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Find this resource:

———. (2006). “Construction Grammar for Kids.” Constructions Special Volume 2006/1. http://elanguage.net/journals/index.php/constructions.

———. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Find this resource:

Tomasello, Michael, Aktar, Nameera, Dodson, Kelly, and Rekau, Laura (1997). “Differential Productivity in Young Children's Use of Nouns and Verbs.” Journal of Child Language 24: 373–87.Find this resource:

Tomasello, Michael, and Brooks, Patricia (1998). “Young Children's Earliest Transitive and Intransitive Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 9: 379–95.Find this resource:

Tomlin, Russell S., Forrest, Linda, Pu, Ming Ming, and Kim, Myung-Hee (1997). “Discourse Semantics,” in Teun A. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage, 63–111.Find this resource:

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1982). “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization,” in Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 245–71.Find this resource:

———. (1988). “Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 14: 406–16.Find this resource:

———. (1989). “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 65: 31–55.Find this resource:

———. (2003 a). “Constructions in Grammaticalization,” in Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 624–47.Find this resource:

———. (2003 b). “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification,” in Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 124–39.Find this resource:

———. (2007). “The Concepts of Constructional Mismatch and Type-shifting from the Perspective of Grammaticalization.” Cognitive Linguistics 18: 523–57.Find this resource:

———. (2008 a). “The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 23–45.Find this resource:

———. (2008 b). “‘All That he Endeavoured to Prove was…’: On the Emergence of Grammatical Constructions in Dialogual Contexts,” in Ruth Kempson and Robin Cooper (eds.), Language Change and Evolution. London: Kings College Publications, 143–77.Find this resource:

(p. 574) ———. (2008 c). “Grammaticalization, Constructions and the Incremental Development of Language: Suggestions from the Development of Degree Modifiers in English,” in Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger, and Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Variation, Selection, Development: Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 219–50.Find this resource:

———. (2008 d). “Grammatikalisierung, Emergente Konstruktionen und der Begriff der ‘Neuheit’,” in Anatol Stefanowitsch and Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik II: Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 5–32.Find this resource:

———. (2010 a). “Contexts and Grammatical Constructionalization.” Plenary lecture presented at the Sixth International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG-6), Prague, September 2010.Find this resource:

———. (2010 b). “(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment,” in Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Contexts and Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 145–92.Find this resource:

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Dasher, Richard B. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Trousdale, Graeme (2010). “Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization: How do They Intersect?,” in Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language 90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 19–44.Find this resource:

Trotta, Joe (2000). Wh-clauses in English: Aspects of Theory and Description. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Rodopi.Find this resource:

Trousdale, Graeme (2008a). “Words and Constructions in Grammaticalization: The End of the English Impersonal Construction,” in Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Donka Minkova (eds.) Studies in the History of the English Language IV: Empirical and Analytical Advances in the Study of English Language Change. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 301–26.Find this resource:

———. (2008 b). “A Constructional Approach to Lexicalization Processes in the History of English: Evidence from Possessive Constructions.” Word Structure 1: 156–77.Find this resource:

———. (2008 c). “Constructions in Grammaticalization and Lexicalization: Evidence from the History of a Composite Predicate Construction in the History of English,” in Graeme Trousdale and Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional Approaches to English Grammar. Topics in English Linguistics 57. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 33–67.Find this resource:

Trousdale, Graeme, and Gisborne, Nikolas (eds.) (2008). Constructional Approaches to English Grammar. Topics in English Linguistics 57. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Trudgill, Peter (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Tummers, Jose, Heylen, Kris, and Geeraerts, Dirk (2005). “Usage-based Approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A Technical State of the Art.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1/2: 225–61.Find this resource:

Tyler, Andrea (2008). “Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Instruction,” in Peter Robinson and N. C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 456–88.Find this resource:

Ullman, Michael T. (2001). “A Neurocognitive Perspective on Language: The Declarative/Procedural Model.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2/10: 717–26.Find this resource:

(p. 575) van Canegem-Ardijns, Ingrid (2006). “The Extraposition of Prepositional Objects of Adjectives in Dutch.” Linguistics 44: 425–57.Find this resource:

van der Auwera, Johan (1985). “Relative that—a Centennial Dispute.” Journal of Linguistics 21: 149–79.Find this resource:

van der Auwera, Johan, and Malchukov, Andrej (2005). “A Semantic Map for Depictive Adjectivals,” in Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Eva F. Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 393–421.Find this resource:

van der Auwera, Johan, and Plungian, Vladimir A. (1998). “Modality's Semantic Map.” Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.Find this resource:

Van der Leek, Frederike (2000). “Caused-motion and the ‘Bottom-up’ Role of Grammar,” in Ad Foolen and Frederike van der Leek (eds.), Constructions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 301–31.Find this resource:

Van Goethem, Kristel (2008). “ Oud-leerling versus ancienélève: A Comparative Study of Adjectives Grammaticalizing into Prefixes in Dutch and French.” Morphology 18: 27–49.Find this resource:

Van Nice, Kathy Y., and Dietrich, Rainer. (2003). “Task-sensitivity of Animacy Effects: Evidence from German Picture Descriptions.” Linguistics 41/5: 825–49.Find this resource:

Van Patten, Bill (2006). “Input Processing in Adult Second Language Acquisition,” in Bill Van Patten and Jessica Williams (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 115–35.Find this resource:

Van Trijp, Remi (2011). “Feature Matrices and Agreement,” in Luc Steels (ed.), Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 205–36.Find this resource:

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. (1980). “On the Distribution of Passive and Antipassive Constructions in Universal Grammar.” Lingua 50: 303–27.Find this resource:

———. (1998). “The Acquisition of Wh-Questions and the Mechanisms of Language Acquisition,” in Michael Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 221–49.Find this resource:

Van Valin, Robert D., Jr., and LaPolla, Randy (1997). Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Find this resource:

Varjú, Dezsö, and Reichardt, Werner (1967). “Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen II.” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 22b: 1343–51.Find this resource:

Verhagen, Arie (2002). “From Parts to Wholes and Back Again.” Cognitive Linguistics 13: 403–39.Find this resource:

———. (2005). Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Find this resource:

Vihman, Marilyn, and Croft, William (2007). “Phonological Development: Toward a ‘Radical’ Templatic Phonology.” Linguistics 45: 683–725.Find this resource:

Voegtlin, Thomas, and Dominey, Peter F. (2005). “Linear Recursive Distributed Representations.” Neural Networks 18/7: 878–95.Find this resource:

Vogt, Paul, and Lieven, Elena V. M. (2010). “Verifying Theories of Language Acquisition Using Computer Models of Language Evolution.” Adaptive Behavior 18: 21–35.Find this resource:

von Mengden, Ferdinand (2008). “Reconstructing Complex Structures: A Typological Perspective,” in Gisella Ferraresi and Maria Goldbach (eds.), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 97–119.Find this resource:

(p. 576) Wardlow Lane, Liane, and Ferreira, Victor S. (2010). “Abstract Syntax in Sentence Production: Evidence from Stem-exchange Errors.” Journal of Memory and Language 62: 151–65.Find this resource:

Watkins, Calvert (1964). “Preliminaries to the Reconstruction of Indo-European Sentence Structure,” in Horace G. Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the IX International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton, 1035–45.Find this resource:

Webelhuth, Gert, and Holler, Anke (2010). “Relative Clause Constructions.” Paper given at the 6th International Conference of Construction Grammar ICCG6, Charles University, Prague, September 3–5, 2010.Find this resource:

Wechsler, Stephen (1997). “Resultative Predicates and Control,” in Ralph Blight and Michelle Moosally (eds.), Texas Linguistic Forum 38: The Syntax and Semantics of Predication. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Department of Linguistics, 307–21.Find this resource:

Weiss, Sabine, Mueller, Horst M., Schack, Baerbel, King, Jonathan W., Kutas, Martha, and Rappelsberger, Peter (2005). “Increased Neuronal Communication Accompanying Sentence Comprehension.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 57/2: 129–41.Find this resource:

Welke, Klaus (1988). Einführung in die Valenz- und Kasustheorie. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut Tübingen: Francke.Find this resource:

———. (2009). “Konstruktionsvererbung, Valenzvererbung und die Reichweite von Konstruktionen.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 37: 514–43.Find this resource:

Wellens, Pieter, and De Beule, Joachim (2010). “Priming through Constructional Dependencies: A Case Study in Fluid Construction Grammar,” in Andrew Smith, Marieke Schouwstra, Bart de Boer, and Kenny Smith (eds.), The Evolution of Language (EVOLANG8). New York: World Scientific, 344–51.Find this resource:

Wennekers, Thomas, Garagnani, Max, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann (2006). “Language Models Based on Hebbian Cell Assemblies.” Journal of Physiology Paris 100: 16–30.Find this resource:

Werlich, Egon (1976). A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.Find this resource:

Wernicke, Carl (1874). Der Aphasische Symptomencomplex: Eine Psychologische Studie auf Anatomischer Basis. Breslau: Kohn und Weigert.Find this resource:

Wide, Camilla (2009). “Interactional Construction Grammar: Contextual Features of Determination in Dialectal Swedish,” in Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Contexts and Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 111–41.Find this resource:

Wiechmann, Daniel (2008a). “On the Computation of Collostruction Strength.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 4/2: 253–90.Find this resource:

———. (2008 b). “Initial Parsing Decisions and Lexical Bias: Corpus Evidence from Local NP/S-Ambiguities.” Cognitive Linguistics 19/3: 447–63.Find this resource:

Wiemer, Björn, and Bisang, Walter (eds.) (2004). What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Find this resource:

Wierzbicka, Anna (1987). “Boys will Be Boys.” Language 63/1: 95–114.Find this resource:

———. (1988). The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Find this resource:

Wilcock, Graham (1999). “Lexicalization of Context,” in Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre König, and Andreas Kathol (eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society, 373–87.Find this resource:

Williams, Edwin (1994). “Remarks on Lexical Knowledge.” Lingua 92: 7–34.Find this resource:

Wilson, Damián Vergara (2009). “From ‘Remaining’ to ‘Becoming’ in Spanish: The Role of Prefabs in the Development of the Construction quedar(se) + ADJECTIVE,” in Roberta Corrigan, Edith Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali, and Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), (p. 577) Formulaic Language. Vol. 1. Typological Studies in language 82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 273–95.Find this resource: