Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 18 November 2019

Abstract and Keywords

The definitions and key measures associated with group climate that underscore definitional confusion and overlap with other group process constructs (e.g., cohesion) are reviewed. Next, research associated with the Group Climate Questionnaire (GCQ), which has become the default definition of climate in the literature, is reviewed. More specifically, 83 studies examining the GCQ relationship with outcome, group development, and other process variables are summarized. Finally, findings from an international collaborative research project over the past decade are summarized to provide an alternative definition of group climate that encompasses other relationship variables (e.g., cohesion, therapeutic alliance, and empathy). We end with a set of questions that this model directly addresses as well as questions to be addressed by future research.

Keywords: group climate, group psychotherapy, group outcomes, group process, three-factor model of therapeutic relationships in group

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.