Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 08 December 2019

Abstract and Keywords

This article explains the discrepancy between well-being in philosophy and well-being in science, and discusses well-being variantism (WBV). It also describes development economics, gerontology, and the study of child well-being. The existence of a variety of measures of a country's well-being is not necessarily evidence of the existence of a variety of notions of well-being. The study of well-being across social and medical sciences does not present a unified front with similar definitions of constructs and measurement instruments. WBV does not imply that what well-being amounts to in a given situation is solely a matter of taste, opinion, or psychological makeup, whether of the judge or the subject. It needs not to maintain that for every existing notion of well-being, there is a context in which it applies. WBV need not to deny that sometimes several context-specific constructs of well-being are needed to combine into a more general notion.

Keywords: well-being variantism, philosophy, science, child well-being, development economics, gerontology

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.