Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 25 February 2020

Abstract and Keywords

Medieval philosophers saw that sceptical arguments need to be taken seriously and paid close attention to their consequences. Yet, they also realized that these arguments are to be discussed in a metaphysical context and attempted to dissolve skeptical arguments by showing that they are in conflict with a number of basic metaphysical principles. This article discusses this close connection between epistemological and metaphysical issues by presenting two case studies, namely Thomas Aquinas's analysis of the demon hypothesis and John Buridan's reaction to the argument appealing to divine omnipotence. It suggests that one cannot understand how and why radical doubts were rejected or neutralized by medieval authors unless one pays attention to their explicit and implicit assumptions about the nature of knowledge claims and the methods for evaluating them.

Keywords: medieval scepticism, Thomas Aquinas, John Buridan, demon hypothesis, divine omnipotence

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.