Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 19 February 2020

Abstract and Keywords

It seems that the medieval debate on universals has no direct relevance for current philosophical interests and that it must be seen, at best, as an intriguing patchwork of pre-modern curiosities. This article examines the matter, and defends the moderately “continuistic” idea that the appellation “the problem of universals” is not equivocal when applied to the set questions at issue under that name in medieval and in contemporary analytical philosophy. First, it presents the case for discontinuism, and then explains what might be the root of both the medieval and the contemporary “problem of universals.” The article also argues that the main dividing line with respect to this problem runs between realism and nominalism, taken in today's sense. Finally, it outlines one of the most salient medieval approaches to the problem of universals: William of Ockham's nominalism.

Keywords: problem of universals, nominalism, discontinuism, William of Ockham, realism

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.