Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 23 February 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article notes that some aspects of what constitutes good argumentation were seen as deriving from formal considerations. These aspects were treated by the medievals as falling under a concept of logical form, but there were at least two notions of logical form. In one sense, form is contrasted with matter in the context of Aristotelian hylomorphic theory. In another sense, form contrasts with matter, that which it is about (id de quo). In this second sense, the matter that is opposed to form is subject matter, or content. Both these notions of form can be traced back to Aristotle, the hylomorphic concept to his physical and metaphysical works, the notion of form as opposed to content to some of his logical works.

Keywords: argumentation, hylomorphic theory, Aristotle, metaphysics, logical form

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.