Show Summary Details

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 04 August 2020

Abstract and Keywords

This article argues that the doubleness or ambivalence which is discernible in the signifying practices of much modernist aesthetics as self-reflexivity and symbolic instability derives from the fact that modernity is the form of appearance, the concrete realization, of capitalist systematicity. The question of how to represent such simultaneity has, of course, dominated both the aesthetic theory and practice of modernism for well over a century. Modernity also entails the related forces of urbanization, industrialization, and bureaucratization, all sustained by the logic of rationalization. Inevitably, these forces materialize in distinct ways, depending on the cultural infrastructures into which they are inserted. The discussion explores these issues in relation to modernity and modernism in South Africa. As everywhere else in the world, cinema constituted a signal medium of modern industrial culture in South Africa.

Keywords: modernist aesthetics, modernity, symbolic instability, capitalism, South African modernism

Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us.